Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 134
Filtrar
1.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 11906, 2021 06 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34099826

RESUMEN

Radioactive radon inhalation is a leading cause of lung cancer and underlies an ongoing public health crisis. Radon exposure prevention strategies typically begin by informing populations about health effects, and their initial efficacy is measured by how well and how fast information convinces individuals to test properties. This communication process is rarely individualized, and there is little understanding if messages impact diverse demographics equally. Here, we explored how 2,390 people interested in radon testing differed in their reaction to radon's public health information and their subsequent decision to test. Only 20% were prompted to radon test after 1 encounter with awareness information, while 65% required 2-5 encounters over several months, and 15% needed 6 to > 10 encounters over many years. People who most delayed testing were more likely to be men or involved in engineering, architecture, real estate and/or physical science-related professions. Social pressures were not a major factor influencing radon testing. People who were the least worried about radon health risks were older and/or men, while negative emotional responses to awareness information were reported more by younger people, women and/or parents. This highlights the importance of developing targeted demographic messaging to create effective radon exposure prevention strategies.


Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Intercambio de Información en Salud , Difusión de la Información/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Salud Pública/métodos , Radón/envenenamiento , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Concienciación , Carcinógenos Ambientales/envenenamiento , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/prevención & control , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
2.
PLoS One ; 14(4): e0215504, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31009485

RESUMEN

Inorganic arsenic is an environmental human carcinogen of several organs including the urinary tract. RWPE-1 cells are immortalized, non-tumorigenic, human prostate epithelia that become malignantly transformed into the CAsE-PE line after continuous in vitro exposure to 5µM arsenite over a period of months. For insight into in vitro arsenite transformation, we performed RNA-seq for differential gene expression and targeted sequencing of KRAS. We report >7,000 differentially expressed transcripts in CAsE-PE cells compared to RWPE-1 cells at >2-fold change, q<0.05 by RNA-seq. Notably, KRAS expression was highly elevated in CAsE-PE cells, with pathway analysis supporting increased cell proliferation, cell motility, survival and cancer pathways. Targeted DNA sequencing of KRAS revealed a mutant specific allelic imbalance, 'MASI', frequently found in primary clinical tumors. We found high expression of a mutated KRAS transcript carrying oncogenic mutations at codons 12 and 59 and many silent mutations, accompanied by lower expression of a wild-type allele. Parallel cultures of RWPE-1 cells retained a wild-type KRAS genotype. Copy number analysis and sequencing showed amplification of the mutant KRAS allele. KRAS is expressed as two splice variants, KRAS4a and KRAS4b, where variant 4b is more prevalent in normal cells compared to greater levels of variant 4a seen in tumor cells. 454 Roche sequencing measured KRAS variants in each cell type. We found KRAS4a as the predominant transcript variant in CAsE-PE cells compared to KRAS4b, the variant expressed primarily in RWPE-1 cells and in normal prostate, early passage, primary epithelial cells. Overall, gene expression data were consistent with KRAS-driven proliferation pathways found in spontaneous tumors and malignantly transformed cell lines. Arsenite is recognized as an important environmental carcinogen, but it is not a direct mutagen. Further investigations into this in vitro transformation model will focus on genomic events that cause arsenite-mediated mutation and overexpression of KRAS in CAsE-PE cells.


Asunto(s)
Arsenitos/envenenamiento , Transformación Celular Neoplásica/efectos de los fármacos , Células Epiteliales/efectos de los fármacos , Amplificación de Genes/efectos de los fármacos , Mutación , Próstata/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/genética , Carcinógenos Ambientales/envenenamiento , Línea Celular , Transformación Celular Neoplásica/genética , Células Epiteliales/metabolismo , Exones/genética , Amplificación de Genes/genética , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Redes Reguladoras de Genes , Humanos , Masculino , Próstata/patología
3.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 14(12): 1284-1296, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27892658

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Though scientifically undisputed, cutaneous syncarcinogenesis is not reflected in German occupational disease (OD) regulations, which tend to be guided by the tenet of monocausality. Recognition of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and its precursor lesions as OD requires individual assessment as to whether the requirements pursuant to either OD 5103 (occupational exposure to natural UV radiation) or OD 5102 (occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) are fulfilled. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 28 patients (median age 72.5 years) with NMSC and respective precursor lesions who had been occupationally exposed to natural UV radiation and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. All cases had undergone expert medical assessment between September 2012 and September 2015. RESULTS: According to our assessments, all 28 cases met the occupational requirements pursuant to OD 5103 and 5102. In 26 cases (93 %), we recommended recognition of skin cancer as occupational disease pursuant to both OD 5103 and OD 5102. The competent occupational insurance association (BG) followed our recommendation in four cases. In eight cases, recognition was solely based on OD 5103; in ten cases, only on OD 5102. Four cases were denied recognition. CONCLUSIONS: Following adequate cumulative occupational exposure to natural UV light as well as occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, NMSC or its precursor lesions arising in UV-exposed areas should be reported to the competent occupational insurance association as "OD 5103 and 5102 in terms of syncarcinogenesis". Apart from the fact that the ensuing recognition proceedings will be able to more adequately reflect real-life workplace conditions, filing a report pursuant to both ODs also allows for recognition of basal cell carcinoma as occupational disease. According to current regulations, this would not be possible, if the assessment were solely based on OD 5103.


Asunto(s)
Carcinógenos Ambientales/envenenamiento , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Hidrocarburos Policíclicos Aromáticos/envenenamiento , Lesiones Precancerosas/etiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/etiología , Luz Solar/efectos adversos , Anciano , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Lesiones Precancerosas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico
4.
Pneumologie ; 70(8): 510-3, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27512930

RESUMEN

Lung cancer is one of the most frequently encountered cancer types. According to the latest WHO data, about 10 % of this disease are due to occupational exposure to cancerogens. Asbestos is still the number one carcinogen. Further frequent causes include quarz and ionizing radiation (uranium mining). Probable causes of the disease can be identified only with the help of detailed occupational history taken by a medical specialist and qualified exposure assessment. Without clarifying the cause of the disease, there is neither a correct insurance procedure nor compensation for the victim, and furthermore, required preventive measures cannot be initiated.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Pulmonares/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Carcinógenos Ambientales/envenenamiento , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo
7.
Toxicol Pathol ; 43(1): 107-14, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25351923

RESUMEN

Lung cancer is the number one cause of cancer-related deaths in humans worldwide. Environmental factors play an important role in the epidemiology of these cancers. Rodents are the most common experimental model to study human lung cancers and are frequently used in bioassays to identify environmental exposure hazards associated with lung cancer. Lung tumors in rodents are common, particularly in certain strains of mice. Rodent lung tumors are predominantly bronchioloalveolar carcinomas and usually follow a progressive continuum of hyperplasia to adenoma to carcinoma. Human lung cancers are phenotypically more diverse and broadly constitute 2 types: small cell lung cancers and nonsmall cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Rodent lung tumors resulting from exposure to environmental agents are comparable with certain adenocarcinomas that are a subset of human NSCLCs. Human pulmonary carcinomas differ from rodent lung tumors by exhibiting greater morphologic heterogeneity (encompassing squamous cell, neuroendocrine, mucinous, sarcomatoid, and multiple cell combinations), higher metastatic rate, higher stromal response, aggressive clinical behavior, and lack of a clear continuum of proliferative lesions. In spite of these differences, rodent lung tumors recapitulate several fundamental aspects of human lung tumor biology at the morphologic and molecular level, especially in lung cancers resulting from exposure to environmental carcinogens.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/inducido químicamente , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Animales , Pruebas de Carcinogenicidad , Carcinógenos Ambientales/envenenamiento , Carcinógenos Ambientales/toxicidad , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Humanos , Pulmón/patología
8.
Pharmacol Ther ; 141(1): 55-68, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23973663

RESUMEN

The chlorinated solvent trichloroethylene (TCE) is a ubiquitous environmental pollutant. The carcinogenic hazard of TCE was the subject of a 2012 evaluation by a Working Group of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Information on exposures, relevant data from epidemiologic studies, bioassays in experimental animals, and toxicity and mechanism of action studies was used to conclude that TCE is carcinogenic to humans (Group 1). This article summarizes the key evidence forming the scientific bases for the IARC classification. Exposure to TCE from environmental sources (including hazardous waste sites and contaminated water) is common throughout the world. While workplace use of TCE has been declining, occupational exposures remain of concern, especially in developing countries. The strongest human evidence is from studies of occupational TCE exposure and kidney cancer. Positive, although less consistent, associations were reported for liver cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. TCE is carcinogenic at multiple sites in multiple species and strains of experimental animals. The mechanistic evidence includes extensive data on the toxicokinetics and genotoxicity of TCE and its metabolites. Together, available evidence provided a cohesive database supporting the human cancer hazard of TCE, particularly in the kidney. For other target sites of carcinogenicity, mechanistic and other data were found to be more limited. Important sources of susceptibility to TCE toxicity and carcinogenicity were also reviewed by the Working Group. In all, consideration of the multiple evidence streams presented herein informed the IARC conclusions regarding the carcinogenicity of TCE.


Asunto(s)
Carcinógenos Ambientales/toxicidad , Neoplasias/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Solventes/toxicidad , Tricloroetileno/toxicidad , Animales , Carcinógenos Ambientales/farmacocinética , Carcinógenos Ambientales/envenenamiento , Humanos , Mutágenos/farmacocinética , Mutágenos/envenenamiento , Mutágenos/toxicidad , Factores de Riesgo , Solventes/farmacocinética , Solventes/envenenamiento , Tricloroetileno/farmacocinética , Tricloroetileno/envenenamiento
9.
Metallomics ; 4(5): 463-72, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22522219

RESUMEN

One hundred chromate production workers chronically exposed to low-level of hexavalent chromium [Cr(vi)] and eighty healthy individuals free from Cr exposure were recruited to the study. Personal sampling of airborne Cr was conducted and Cr content was quantified by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (FAAS). At the end of the sampling shift, blood samples were collected and element concentrations were measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for Cr, Cd, Cu, Mo and Se and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) for Ca, Fe, Mg and Zn. According to our results, 90% of the chromate production workers were exposed to airborne Cr in a concentration lower than 50 µg m(-3), which is the threshold limit value recommended by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists and Chinese Ministry of Health. After Cr(vi) exposure, a significant increase in blood Cr, Cd, Fe, Mg, Mo, Se and Zn concentrations was observed, as well as a significant decrease in Ca concentration. A decrease in blood Cu was only observed among female workers. Blood Cr concentrations of the exposed workers (median = 15.68 ng mL(-1)) was four times higher than that of the controls (median = 3.03 ng mL(-1)), and significantly correlated with airborne Cr (r = 0.568, P<0.001). In addition, the inter-element correlations exhibited significant differences between the two groups. Our findings of the related health effects suggested that the underlying mechanisms of chronic Cr(vi) exposure on blood element homeostasis might be partly explained by oxidative stress in the body, dysfunction of Fe metabolism and renal injury.


Asunto(s)
Cromo/sangre , Metales Pesados/sangre , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Calcio/sangre , Carcinógenos Ambientales/metabolismo , Carcinógenos Ambientales/envenenamiento , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Cromo/envenenamiento , Femenino , Intoxicación por Metales Pesados , Homeostasis/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Espectrometría de Masas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Selenio/sangre , Espectrofotometría Atómica , Estadísticas no Paramétricas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA