[Diagnostic Value of Locally Produced Tumor Markers and Blood Brain Barrier
Integrity in Lung Cancer Patients with Leptomeningeal Metastasis].

BACKGROUND: Tumor markers (TM) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are useful for diagnosing leptomeningeal metastasis (LM). It has not been fully exploited the diagnostic possibilities of the CSF levels since the basic fact that the TM concentration of CSF depends strongly upon the serum levels as well as upon the condition of the blood brain barrier (BBB). To analyze the intrathecal TM synthesis and evaluate the integrity of BBB can be helpful for the definitive diagnosis of LM. Therefore, the aim of this study was to further explore the clinical value of intrathecal TM synthesis and BBB in the diagnosis for the lung cancer patients with LM. METHODS: Twenty-five lung cancer patients with LM and 57 patients with nonmalignant neurological diseases (NMNDs) admitted to Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from December 2016 to March 2020 were included. We compared the integrity of BBB and intrathecal TM synthesis between two groups, analyzed the correlation of CSF TM between the detection and intrathecal synthesis, and evaluated serial CSF cytology, the integrity of BBB and intrathecal TM synthesis when intrathecal chemotherapy for one patient. RESULTS: Ninety-four percent LM patients showed the dysfunction of BBB, and all LM patients showed at least one intrathecal synthesized TM in CSF. In one patient, the CSF cytology was negative for the first time, but LM was eventually diagnosed based on the the intrathecal TM synthesis and positive CSF cytology of repeated lumbar puncture. In LM group, no correlation was observed between the detection and intrathecal synthesized TM in CSF. In the control group, only 3.5% (2/57) NMNDs patients had the dysfunction of BBB and no patients had intrathecal TM synthesis, both the differences of which were statistically significant (P<0.05). Finally, evaluating the CSF cytology, integrity of BBB and intrathecal TM synthesis can be used to assess the intracranial treatment effect. Moreover, intrathecal TM synthesis changes earlier than cytology. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of intrathecal TM synthesis and integrity of BBB are novel clinical diagnostic tools. In addition, serial measurement of intrathecal synthesized TM may play an important role in monitoring efficacy of lung cancer patients with LM, which is worthy of further promotion and clinical application.

[Auxiliary Diagnostic Value of Tumor Markers in the Cerebrospinal Fluid and Blood for Leptomeningeal Metastasis from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].

BACKGROUND: Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is one of the most common causes of death in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which is defined as malignant cells spreading to meninges and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Therefore, early diagnosis and timely treatment are essential. CSF cytology is the gold standard for LM diagnosis, however, it has a low sensitivity for diagnosis and can't be used to evaluate the treatment effect. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical value of serum and CSF tumor markers (TM) in the diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC patients with LM. METHODS: Nineteen patients with NSCLC-LM and 27 patients with nonmalignant neurological diseases (NMNDs) were included. We tested the levels and positive rates of carbohydrate antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen-125 (CA125), cytokeratin 19 fragments (CYFRA21-1) and neurone specific enolase (NSE) in CSF and serum, compared the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of LM between different groups, and analyzed the correlation of detection between serum and CSF. Finally, we measured serum and CSF TM dynamically in 2 patients with NSCLC developing LM in an attempt to correlate these with the treatment response of extracranial and intracranial, respectively. RESULTS: The levels and positive rates of TM in CSF and serum in LM group were higher than those in NMNDs (P<0.05). In LM group, the levels of CEA, CYFRA21-1 and CEA were significantly higher in CSF than that in the serum (P<0.05), whereas, there was no statistical significance in positive rates of TM between CSF and serum (P>0.05). In CSF, CYFRA21-1 has the highest sensitivity (88.2%) and CEA has the best specificity (92.3%) to distinguish patients between LM and NMNDs. For combined detection of CEA, CA125, CYFRA 21-1 and NSE in CSF, when at least CEA or NSE was positive in patients with LM, the sensitivity and negative predictive value were 100.0%, and the specificity was 74.1%. When both CYFRA21-1 and NSE were positive, the specificity and positive predictive value were 100.0%, and the sensitivity was 78.9%. Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed that the detection rates of TM in CSF cytology positive population was higher than that in typical abnormalities magnetic resonance imaging population, but there was no statistical difference (P>0.05). The detection of TM between serum and CSF in LM patients had no significant correlation. Moreover, biochemical properties of CSF from ventricle and lumbar puncture are similar, therefore evaluating the levels of TM in serum and CSF dynamically can be used to assess the extracranial and intracranial treatment effect, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that Serum and CSF TM can work as an auxiliary clinical diagnostic tool, which has a potential value in early diagnosis of NSCLC patients with LM. Serial measurement of TM may play an important role in the clinical management of NSCLC patients with LM, which is worthy of further promotion and clinical application.

Cerebrospinal fluid ferritin--unspecific and unsuitable for disease monitoring.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Subarachnoid hemorrhage is sometimes difficult to diagnose radiologically. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) ferritin has been proposed to be highly specific and sensitive to detect hemorrhagic central nervous system (CNS) disease. We analyzed here the specificity of CSF ferritin in a large series of various CNS diseases and the influence of serum ferritin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CSF ferritin, lactate, protein and total cell count were analyzed in 141 samples: neoplastic meningitis (n=62), subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=20), pyogenic infection (n=10), viral infection (n=10), multiple sclerosis (n=10), borreliosis (n=5) and normal controls (n=24). Cerebrospinal fluid ferritin was measured with a microparticle immunoassay. In addition, serum and CSF ferritin were compared in 18 samples of bacterial and neoplastic meningitis. RESULTS: In CNS hemorrhage, median ferritin was 51.55µg/L (sensitivity: 90%) after the second lumbar puncture. In neoplastic meningitis, the median CSF ferritin was 16.3µg/L (sensitivity: 45%). Interestingly, ferritin was higher in solid tumors than that in hematological neoplasms. In 90% of pyogenic inflammation, ferritin was elevated with a median of 53.35µg/L, while only 50% of patients with viral infection had elevated CSF ferritin. In ventricular CSF, median ferritin was 163µg/L, but only 20.6µg/L in lumbar CSF. Ferritin was normal in multiple sclerosis and borreliosis. CONCLUSIONS: Ferritin was elevated not only in hemorrhagic disease, but also in neoplastic and infectious meningitis. Ferritin was not a reliable marker of the course of disease. The influence of serum ferritin on CSF ferritin is negligible. We conclude that elevated CSF ferritin reliably, but unspecifically indicates severe CNS disease.