Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 113
Filtrar
1.
Psychol Addict Behav ; 37(7): 977-984, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36107640

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Substance use is the leading cause of preventable deaths in the U.S. Chronic pain is associated with risky substance use. Black individuals experience substantial disparities in pain and substance use outcomes and treatment. Maladaptive psychological reactions to chronic pain, such as pain catastrophizing and pain anxiety, can increase substance use among White individuals. However, no research to date has tested this among Black individuals. This study is the first to test the relationships between pain catastrophizing, pain anxiety, and substance use among Black individuals with chronic pain who use opioid medications. METHOD: Black adults with chronic pain who use opioids (N = 401) completed online measures of pain catastrophizing (Brief Pain Catastrophizing Scale); pain anxiety (Pain Anxiety Symptom Scale Short Form-20); risky use of alcohol, tobacco, e-cigarettes, cannabis and opioids (Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test); and opioid dependence (Severity of Dependence Scale). We conducted zero-inflated and hierarchical regressions to test associations between pain catastrophizing, pain anxiety and substance use (risky use; general use vs. nonuse) above that of demographics, pain intensity and pain interference. RESULTS: Pain catastrophizing was uniquely associated with risky use of all substances (ßs = .03-.09, ps < .001-.02), opioid dependence (ß = .13, SE = .05, p = .01), and use (vs. nonuse) of tobacco, alcohol and opioids (ßs = .07-.11, ps < .001-.02). Pain anxiety was uniquely associated with tobacco use (vs. nonuse; ß = -.02, SE = .01, p = .04) and severity of opioid dependence (ß = .21, SE = .01, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Pain catastrophizing and, to a lesser degree, pain anxiety may be useful intervention targets for this underserved and understudied population. Addressing them may help reduce additional health complications and costs associated with substance use-related risk and dependence. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Adulto , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Depresión/psicología , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Catastrofización/epidemiología , Catastrofización/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/psicología
2.
J Pain ; 23(7): 1196-1207, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35151872

RESUMEN

The Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ) assesses the degree to which chronic pain sufferers perceive injustice in relation to their pain. The aim of the current study was to assess the prevalence and relevance of the IEQ and its association to perceived recovery and deterioration in a naturalistic pain clinic population. Data was obtained from the Oslo University Hospital's Pain Registry. Among 2,950 patients, the prevalence of low (<19), medium (19-29) and high (30+) IEQ was 39%, 32% and 29% respectively. High levels of injustice were positively associated with a wide range of adverse health outcomes. Differences between those with high vs low levels of IEQ were clinically significant for most health outcomes. A Venn diagram analysis showed considerable, but not complete, overlap between IEQ, pain catastrophizing, psychological distress and severe pain intensity. High IEQ was associated with reduced clinical recovery (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9) and deterioration (OR 3.6, 95% CI 2.1-6.2) at 12-months follow-up, however, not when controlling for pain-related disability and pain intensity. We conclude that perceived injustice is a prevalent and clinically relevant phenomenon in a chronic pain clinic population, and that more knowledge is needed regarding its role as indicator of poor prognosis and target for tailored treatment. PERSPECTIVE: This article shows that pain-related injustice is both prevalent and relevant in a large naturalistic pain clinic population. Higher levels of injustice were consistently associated with adverse pain outcomes. Injustice could as such be a viable target for treatment of chronic pain, with potential indirect effects on pain and disability.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Catastrofización/epidemiología , Catastrofización/psicología , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Humanos , Dimensión del Dolor , Prevalencia , Psicometría , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Int J Rheum Dis ; 24(12): 1520-1529, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34698449

RESUMEN

AIM: This study aimed to assess the relationship between pain catastrophizing and achievement of 28-joint Disease Activity Score-defined remission of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), considering the presence or absence of systemic inflammation, and to evaluate associated factors for pain catastrophizing. METHOD: This cross-sectional study included 421 RA outpatients. The relationship between pain catastrophizing and remission was analyzed by adjusting several confounding factors. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the relationship between pain catastrophizing and RA-related factors, comorbidities, and lifestyle habits. RESULTS: The prevalence of pain catastrophizing was 26%. Pain catastrophizing was negatively associated with remission (odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.38-1.00, P = .048). A multinomial logistic analysis showed that the presence of pain catastrophizing was an independent factor that was negatively correlated with the achievement of remission in the absence of systemic inflammation (odds ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.93, P = .029). Factors associated with elevated ratings on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale were a history of falls within the past year, a Health Assessment Questionnaire score >0.5, and smoking habit. Further, patients' subjective symptoms, including patient global assessment minus evaluator global assessment values ≥20 and high tender joint count minus swollen joint counts, were associated with elevated pain catastrophizing. CONCLUSION: Pain catastrophizing is a major obstacle to achieving remission in RA patients with normal C-reactive protein levels. Advanced physical disability, smoking habit, and history of falls were associated with pain catastrophizing, in addition to patients' subjective symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/psicología , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Catastrofización/psicología , Dolor/psicología , Anciano , Artritis Reumatoide/sangre , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Sedimentación Sanguínea , Catastrofización/epidemiología , Catastrofización/etiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/etiología , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Prevalencia , Inducción de Remisión , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
4.
J Pain ; 22(8): 879-891, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33581324

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to analyze the cross-sectional and longitudinal association between pain catastrophizing and opioid misuse, opioid use, and opioid dose in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain. For this systematic review, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, manual searches, and grey literature were searched from inception to May 2020. Observational studies were included if they evaluated the association between pain catastrophizing and opioid dose, opioid use, and/or opioid misuse in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Two reviewers independently performed the study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and the certainty of the evidence judgment. Seven observational studies (all cross-sectional designs) satisfied the eligibility criteria, with a total sample of 2,160 participants. Pain catastrophizing was associated with opioid misuse. The results were inconsistent regarding the association between pain catastrophizing and opioid use. A lack of association was found considering pain catastrophizing and the opioid dose. However, the presence of risk of bias and imprecision was serious across the included studies, and therefore, the overall certainty of the evidence was judged as very low for all the outcome measures. This report concludes that pain catastrophizing seem to be associated with opioid misuse in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain. However, the very low certainty of the current evidence confers to interpret the finding of this review as exclusively informative. PERSPECTIVE: This article shows that pain catastrophizing seem to be associated with opioid misuse in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The overall certainty of the evidence was judged to be very low, thus, these results should be interpreted with caution.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Catastrofización/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Dolor Musculoesquelético/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Musculoesquelético/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Humanos
5.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 19(1): 49, 2021 Feb 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33563291

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to predict the quality of life (QOL) in patients with Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN) based on pain severity, pain catastrophizing, pain acceptance, depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbance. Also, this study was aimed to assess the prevalence of psychiatric symptoms in Iranian patients with PDN. METHOD: 1120 patients (mean age, 53.6 ± 12.6 years) participated in the research. Data were collected by the Quality of life questionnaire (NeuroQoL); Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, the visual analog scale for pain severity, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Finally, the data were analyzed using SPSS-26 by multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: The results showed the regression models' significance, and the dependent variables predicted 42% of total changes in the QOL. The most significant predicting factors were depression, pain catastrophizing, pain acceptance, pain severity, sleep disturbance, and anxiety in order. In patients with PDN, the prevalence of sleep disturbances, depression, and anxiety were 85.5%, 68.2%, and 62.1%, respectively. Also, comorbid depression and anxiety were found in 47% of patients. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrated a significant relationship between pain-related and psychiatric dimensions with QOL. Thus, it is suggested to design more specific psychological-based rehabilitation interventions in which these variables are considered. They should focus on more significant variables (such as depression and pain catastrophizing) to reach better treatment outcomes. Furthermore, this research shows a high level of anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance in Iranian patients with PDN. Thus, experts and clinicians are suggested to focus on reducing these psychiatric symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Catastrofización/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Neuropatías Diabéticas/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Neuropatías Diabéticas/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Irán/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Prevalencia , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
Urology ; 150: 146-150, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32668289

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the relationship between catastrophization and pelvic pain symptomatology in chronic pelvic pain (CPP) patients using standardized questionnaires. METHODS: CPP patients completed standardized questionnaires which included: genitourinary pain index, patient health questionnaire for anxiety and depression, interstitial cystitis symptom index, and pelvic floor distress inventory. Scores and number of comorbidities were compared to Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) by linear regression. Patients categorized as "extreme catastrophizing" (PCS score ≥30), traditionally associated with worse outcomes in the pain literature [10-11], were also analyzed separately. RESULTS: 184 patients were included (mean age 42 years, N = 23 male). Higher number of pain comorbidities was correlated to PCS (P < .001) as well as higher scores on all standardized questionnaires (P < .001). Forty-four percent of patients (81/184) were extreme catastrophizers and scored significantly worse on all standardized measures when compared to nonextreme catastrophizers. Mean scores for nonextreme vs extreme catastrophizers were: genitourinary pain index (25.7 ± 6.8 vs 32.7 ± 6.5, P < .001), interstitial cystitis symptom index (6.5 ± 4.7 vs 9.4 ± 5.8, P < .001), pelvic floor distress inventory (88.8 ± 52 vs 121.1 ± 62.8, P < .001), patient health questionnaire anxiety (1.7 ± 2.0 vs 3.6 ± 2.1, P < .001), and depression (1.4 ± 1.6 vs 3.3 ± 2.0, P < .001). Number of comorbidities was not significant predictor of extreme catastrophizing (3.5 vs 3.7 P = .22). CONCLUSION: Higher scores on standardized questionnaires and more comorbidities was associated with more catastrophizing in CPP patients. This study highlights the significance of standardized questionnaires, including the PCS, to predict which patients may be extreme catastrophizers and thus subject to worse outcomes. Future studies are needed to look at catastrophization as a potentially modifiable and treatable risk factor.


Asunto(s)
Catastrofización/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Dimensión del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor Pélvico/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Catastrofización/epidemiología , Catastrofización/psicología , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuestionario de Salud del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor Pélvico/diagnóstico , Dolor Pélvico/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto Joven
7.
Pain Pract ; 21(3): 366-380, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33131210

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the overall effect of therapeutic pain neuroscience education (TPNE) on chronic musculoskeletal pain and to further assess whether such an effect differs by TPNE dosage as well as other treatment format components. Dosage included the number of TPNE sessions provided as well as the amount of time per TPNE session. Structural components included TPNE provided alone as treatment or combined with other pain management modalities, as well as the inclusion of group-based treatment sessions. METHODS: Electronic databases were utilized to search for randomized controlled trials that included TPNE. The overall effectiveness of TPNE was estimated on 4 pain outcome measures, including kinesiophobia, pain intensity, pain disability, and pain catastrophizing. The differential effectiveness of TPNE was examined using a mixed-methods moderator analysis on various study-level characteristics to identify potential moderators affecting the overall results. RESULTS: Significant effects of TPNE were found on all the outcome measures. The only moderator that displayed a significant effect was group-based treatment on kinesiophobia (z = -2.23, P < 0.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.70 to -0.20). Between-group analysis revealed that only interventions that included group sessions were found to be statistically significant (z = 2.20, P < 0.05) and displayed a large effect size (d = 0.80, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.50). DISCUSSION: Therapeutic pain neuroscience education had a statistically significant impact on all the explored pain outcome measures. However, when investigating the treatment dosage and format moderator variables, they appeared to not have a statistically significant effect except for group-based interventions on kinesiophobia levels. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis examined the efficacy of TPNE for patients with chronic pain. It assessed various pain outcome measures following intervention. In addition, this research identified that various moderator variables do not have and do have an impact on the treatment modality of TPNE.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/terapia , Neurociencias/educación , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Catastrofización/epidemiología , Catastrofización/etiología , Catastrofización/prevención & control , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Modificador del Efecto Epidemiológico , Humanos , Dolor Musculoesquelético/epidemiología , Dolor Musculoesquelético/terapia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Manejo del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
8.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 147(1): 66e-75e, 2021 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33370055

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Depression and pain catastrophizing are aspects of the patient's mindset that have been shown to be important in relation to the outcome of carpal tunnel release. However, other factors of the patient's mindset have been understudied, such as treatment expectations and illness perceptions. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of these mindset aspects on outcome of carpal tunnel release, in addition to psychological distress and pain catastrophizing. METHODS: A total of 307 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome who visited outpatient hand surgery clinics and who completed online questionnaires regarding demographic and psychosocial characteristics and carpal tunnel syndrome severity were included. The patient mindset was measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-4, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire, and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire. Hierarchical linear regression models were used to examine the relation between self-reported severity 6 months after carpal tunnel release, as measured with the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, and psychosocial aspects of mindset, adjusting for preoperative Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire score, patient characteristics, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Independent associations with better self-reported outcome were found for higher treatment expectations (ß = -0.202; p < 0.001) and illness comprehensibility (ß = -0.223; p < 0.001). The additional explained variance in Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire scores by the patient's mindset was 13.2 percent (psychological distress and pain catastrophizing together, 2.1 percent; treatment expectations and illness perceptions together, 11.1 percent). CONCLUSION: Treatment outcome expectations and comprehensibility of illness are both independently associated with the outcome of carpal tunnel release, showing the importance of these aspects of the patient's mindset for the outcome of carpal tunnel release. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano/cirugía , Catastrofización/epidemiología , Descompresión Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Depresión/epidemiología , Dolor/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano/complicaciones , Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano/psicología , Catastrofización/diagnóstico , Catastrofización/etiología , Catastrofización/psicología , Descompresión Quirúrgica/psicología , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/etiología , Depresión/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/diagnóstico , Dolor/etiología , Dolor/psicología , Dimensión del Dolor , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Autoinforme/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Pain Manag ; 11(2): 159-172, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33183132

RESUMEN

Aim: To provide a detailed profile of Veteran and community patients with chronic pain who completed preprocedural psychological evaluations for implantable pain devices. Patients & methods: A total of 157 candidates completed a preimplantable pain device evaluation between June 2018 and October 2019 with a pain psychologist that included a structured interview, elicitation of patient-centered goals for the implantable device, and psychometric testing. Results: Candidates demonstrated moderate to high rates of sleep impairment (73%), depressive symptoms (62%), anxiety symptoms (61%), pain catastrophizing (37%), cognitive impairment screen (30%) and somatic symptoms (24%). Conclusion: Candidates for implantable pain devices report high rates of mood, sleep and cognitive impairment, reinforcing the value of preprocedural psychological evaluations.


Asunto(s)
Catastrofización/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Depresión/diagnóstico , Neuroestimuladores Implantables/psicología , Entrevista Psicológica/normas , Síntomas sin Explicación Médica , Psicometría/normas , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/diagnóstico , Estimulación de la Médula Espinal/psicología , Adulto , Catastrofización/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/epidemiología , Veteranos
10.
Pain Res Manag ; 2020: 9629526, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33193926

RESUMEN

Purpose: Pain catastrophizing may contribute to the altered trunk muscle activity in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP). It is unclear if pain catastrophizing influences static postural control in patients with NSCLBP. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between pain catastrophizing and static postural control in NSCLBP patients. Methods: Sixty-eight participants with NSCLBP and 40 healthy participants were recruited. Postural control was assessed by the sway area and the sway length of the center of pressure (COP) during balance tests. Pain catastrophizing in participants with NSCLBP was assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Bilateral transversus abdominis (TrA) activation was evaluated by ultrasound imaging-measured percent change in muscle thickness. Associations between COP parameter and PCS/subscales of PCS were examined by multiple linear regression (MLR). Results: Our results observed a larger COP sway area in NSCLBP group under eyes-closed condition (p < 0.001) and a lower level of voluntary activation of the bilateral TrA (p < 0.001), compared with the healthy control group. The MLR analyses revealed that the COP area sway under eyes-closed condition was significantly associated with the PCS score/helplessness score of PCS, voluntary activation of the left TrA, and age in participants with NSCLBP (ß = 0.222/0.236, 0.341/0.344, and 0.328/0.325; p=0.045/0.033, 0.002, and 0.004, resp.). Conclusions: Static postural control was associated with pain catastrophizing, voluntary activation of TrA, and age in participants with NSCLBP. This indicated that pain catastrophizing may affect postural control and should be considered when interpreting balance test results and managing NSCLBP.


Asunto(s)
Músculos Abdominales/diagnóstico por imagen , Músculos Abdominales/fisiología , Catastrofización/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico por imagen , Equilibrio Postural/fisiología , Adulto , Catastrofización/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
11.
Pain Res Manag ; 2020: 8814290, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33204378

RESUMEN

Osteoporotic fractures are common among older people, and hip fractures (HF) can be devastating. Surgery is indicated for most cases of HF, and chronic persistent postoperative pain is likely to occur. This study investigated the multifaceted factors related to persistent pain occurring during the acute phase and subacute phase of recovery after HF surgery. We conducted a prospective 8-week study of older HF patients after surgery. We evaluated pain intensity, depression symptoms, the fear of falling, pain catastrophizing, cognition and attention, the ability to perform activities of daily living, and the physical performance at 2 weeks (acute phase) and at 4 weeks (subacute phase) after surgery. Patients were divided into the light group (Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) score ≤1) and severe group (VRS score ≥2) according to pain intensity at 8 weeks (recovery phase) after surgery. Factors affecting persistent postoperative pain during recovery were examined using logistic regression analysis. Seventy-two patients were analyzed: 50 in the light group and 22 in the severe group. In the severe group, pain with movement and Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores were higher than those of the light group at 2 weeks and at 4 weeks after surgery. The regression analysis showed that pain with movement at 2 weeks and at 4 weeks after surgery and pain catastrophizing at 4 weeks after surgery were related to persistent postoperative pain. HF patients may have persistent pain if they continue to experience pain and catastrophize their pain during the acute phase and subacute phase after surgery.


Asunto(s)
Catastrofización/diagnóstico , Catastrofización/psicología , Fracturas de Cadera/psicología , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/psicología , Accidentes por Caídas , Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Catastrofización/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Miedo/psicología , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos
12.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 146(6): 1307-1316, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33234961

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is unclear which factors predict acute postoperative pain in patients surgically treated for thumb base osteoarthritis. The authors investigated the influence of type of surgery, preoperative sociodemographics, preoperative patient-reported outcome measures, psychological characteristics, and postoperative opioid use on acute postoperative pain 24 hours postoperatively following surgery for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. In addition, preoperative and acute postoperative pain were compared. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 215 patients surgically treated for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis were included. Data were collected in 16 clinics for hand surgery and therapy in The Netherlands. Hierarchical regression was used to identify whether type of surgery, preoperative sociodemographics, preoperative patient-reported outcome measures, psychological characteristics (including treatment credibility and expectations, illness perception, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression), and postoperative opioid use predicted acute postoperative pain 24 hours postoperatively, measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (range, 0 to 10). RESULTS: Female sex, opioid use, higher preoperative satisfaction with hand, and higher self-reported consequences and coherence predicted greater postoperative pain, with 31 percent explained variance in the final model including psychological factors. Mean postoperative Numeric Pain Rating Scale score was lower (5.1 ± 2.4) than preoperative pain, measured using visual analogue scales (during the past week, 6.7 ± 1.7; physical load, 7.5 ± 1.7) and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (6.4 ± 1.4; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Psychological factors, female sex, and opioid use enhance the prediction of acute postoperative pain beyond surgery type, preoperative sociodemographics, and patient-reported outcome measures. Female sex and opioid use were the strongest predictors, even after controlling for psychological factors. Future studies may investigate sex-based approaches and patient education for reducing acute postoperative pain. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.


Asunto(s)
Articulaciones Carpometacarpianas/cirugía , Osteoartritis/cirugía , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Articulaciones Carpometacarpianas/patología , Catastrofización/epidemiología , Catastrofización/psicología , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis/patología , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Dimensión del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Autoinforme/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Sexuales , Pulgar/cirugía
13.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 20(1): 623, 2020 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33059638

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The perinatal period is a time of immense change, which can be a period of stress and vulnerability for mental health difficulties. Mindfulness-based interventions have shown promise for reducing distress, but further research is needed to identify long-term effects and moderators of mindfulness training in the perinatal period. METHODS: The current study used data from a pilot randomized control trial (RCT) comparing a condensed mindfulness-based childbirth preparation program-the Mind in Labor (MIL)-to treatment as usual (TAU) to examine whether prenatal mindfulness training results in lower distress across the perinatal period, and whether the degree of benefit depends on child-bearers' initial levels of risk (i.e., depression and anxiety symptoms) and protective (i.e., mindfulness) characteristics. Child-bearers (N = 30) in their third trimester were randomized to MIL or TAU and completed assessments of distress-perceived stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms-at pre-intervention, post-intervention, six-weeks post-birth, and one-year postpartum. RESULTS: Multilevel modeling of distress trajectories revealed greater decreases from pre-intervention to 12-months postpartum for those in MIL compared to TAU, especially among child-bearers who were higher in anxiety and/or lower in dispositional mindfulness at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The current study offers preliminary evidence for durable perinatal mental health benefits following a brief mindfulness-based program and suggests further investigation of these effects in larger samples is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The ClinicalTrials.gov identifier for the study is: NCT02327559 . The study was retrospectively registered on June 23, 2014.


Asunto(s)
Atención Plena , Madres/psicología , Atención Perinatal/métodos , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Educación Prenatal/métodos , Distrés Psicológico , Adulto , Animales , Catastrofización/epidemiología , Catastrofización/etiología , Catastrofización/prevención & control , Catastrofización/psicología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Trabajo de Parto/psicología , Masculino , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor/etiología , Dolor/psicología , Percepción del Dolor , Periodo Posparto/psicología , Embarazo , Autoeficacia , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & control , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
14.
PLoS One ; 15(8): e0236111, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32790685

RESUMEN

A relationship between chronic pain and frailty has been reported. The early detection and prevention of frailty are recommended, in part because community-dwelling older adults in a pre-frailty state may return to a healthy state. The relationship between chronic pain and pre-frailty is not known. Toward the goal of promoting a reversible return to health from pre-frailty, we investigated the relationship between chronic pain and pre-frailty among community-dwelling older adults. We assessed the frailty and chronic pain of 107 older adults who were participating in community health checks. The status of physical frailty was based on the five components described by Fried (2001): muscle weakness shown by handgrip strength, slowness of gait speed, weight loss, low physical activity, and exhaustion. Chronic pain was assessed based on pain intensity, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Japanese version of the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15), and the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). The prevalence of chronic pain with pre-frailty was 40.2%. A hierarchical analysis revealed that PCS-measured helplessness (odds ratio [OR]: 0.88) and the CSI (OR: 0.87) were significant factors associated with the presence of chronic pain with pre-frailty. The prevalence of chronic pain with pre-frailty was high, and chronic pain and pre-frailty were strongly related. New intervention or prevention programs that take into account both chronic pain and pre-frailty must be created as soon as possible.


Asunto(s)
Catastrofización/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Fragilidad/prevención & control , Vida Independiente , Debilidad Muscular/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Catastrofización/psicología , Dolor Crónico/complicaciones , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Anciano Frágil/psicología , Anciano Frágil/estadística & datos numéricos , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Fragilidad/etiología , Evaluación Geriátrica , Fuerza de la Mano , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Debilidad Muscular/diagnóstico , Debilidad Muscular/etiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Prevalencia
15.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 101(10): 1754-1762, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32445848

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate pain catastrophizing presentations up to 6 months postoperatively and subsequent changes in pain intensity and physical function. DESIGN: Prospective observational multisite study. SETTING: Two tertiary care facilities between 2016 and 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients (N=348) undergoing a mastectomy, thoracic surgery, total knee or hip arthroplasty, spinal fusion, or major abdominal surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores, Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale, average pain intensity, and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function. RESULTS: Four pain catastrophizing trajectories were identified in 348 surgical patients during the 6 months of postoperative recovery: stable, remitting, worsening, and unremitting. Linear mixed-effects models found that the unremitting trajectory was associated with higher pain intensity over time. The average pain intensity of participants in the remitting trajectory was estimated to decrease at a faster rate over the 6 months after surgery than pain of other trajectories, despite participants reporting high preoperative Pain Catastrophizing Scale and pain scores. Worsening and unremitting trajectories were associated with reduced physical function. Preoperative average pain intensity scores were not associated with postoperative physical function scores, nor were participants' preoperative physical function scores associated with average pain intensity scores postoperatively. Prolonged hospitalization, smoking, and preoperative opioid prescriptions were associated with the unremitting trajectory. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that preoperative pain catastrophizing scores alone may not be adequate for estimating long-term patient-reported outcomes during postoperative rehabilitation. Pain catastrophizing has a dynamic presentation and is associated with changes in pain intensity and physical function up to 6 months postoperatively. Routine assessments can inform the delivery of early interventions to surgical patients at risk of experiencing a pain catastrophizing trajectory associated with suboptimal outcomes during rehabilitation.


Asunto(s)
Catastrofización/epidemiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Catastrofización/fisiopatología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/fisiopatología , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Rendimiento Físico Funcional , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
16.
Scand J Pain ; 20(3): 635-646, 2020 07 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32383692

RESUMEN

Background and aims Psychological traits such as pain catastrophizing may play a role in the development of chronic pelvic pain (CPP). Pain catastrophizing is the tendency to amplify negative cognitive and emotional pain processes. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) assesses elements of pain catastrophizing divided into three subgroups of factors (rumination, helplessness and magnification). Previous studies have shown associations between CPP and increased pain sensitivity, widespread generalized hyperalgesia, and decreased pain thresholds, but the relation between pain catastrophizing and specific pain thresholds has not yet been widely examined in this patient group. The aims of this study were (a) to determine if catastrophizing is increased in women with CPP compared with pain-free women, (b) to assess the importance of pain catastrophizing, psychological distress variables, and subjective pain sensitivity for pain thresholds of heat, cold and pressure in these two groups, and (c) to determine whether psychological variables or pain thresholds best contribute to the differentiation between CPP and controls. Methods Thirty-seven women with chronic pelvic pain who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy on the suspicion of endometriosis participated along with 55 healthy and pain-free controls. All underwent quantitative sensory testing on six locations on the body to determine heat (HPT), cold (CPT) and pressure (PPT) pain thresholds. The PCS, the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ), the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, (HADS) demographics and clinical data were collected prospectively. Principal component analysis and orthogonal partial least square regressions were used to assess the associations between PCS scores and pain thresholds. Results The women with CPP scored significantly higher on PCS than the healthy controls. PCS-helplessness, PCS-rumination and HADS-depression were significantly associated with pain thresholds for the whole group. In the CPP group, PCS-rumination, body mass index and PSQ were significant regressors for HPT and CPT. The PCS and the HADS subscales were strongly intercorrelated in women with CPP and were stronger regressors of group membership than the three pain thresholds. In the group of healthy control women, no relationships were found to be significant. The psychological variables were somewhat stronger significant regressors than pain thresholds (also significant) for group membership. Conclusions Women with CPP have significantly higher pain catastrophizing scores than women without CPP. The pain catastrophizing rumination factor is significantly associated with pain thresholds of heat and cold in CPP women. PCS and HADS are strongly intercorrelated and PSQ correlates positively with these variables. It seems that the psychological variables are important for group differentiation. Implications The results clearly indicate the need for a multimodal assessment (bio-psycho-social) of CPP patients including psychological symptoms such as catastrophizing, anxiety and depression. The registration of semi-objective pain thresholds captures both specific pain sensitivity information (mechanical pressure, cold or heat) and the degree of wide spread pain hypersensitivity. There is a need for future larger studies investigating whether certain profiles in the clinical presentations (including pain thresholds and psychological variables) are associated with outcomes after different types of interventions.


Asunto(s)
Catastrofización/psicología , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Umbral del Dolor/psicología , Dolor Pélvico/psicología , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Catastrofización/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Frío , Femenino , Calor , Humanos , Dolor Pélvico/epidemiología , Presión , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
17.
Pain Physician ; 23(2): 209-218, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32214303

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Physical modalities have been safely used for decades for pain relief and for reducing physical disability in the conservative treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, patients' response to treatment is highly variable, which may be related to certain patient-related factors such as pain catastrophizing and depression. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of pain catastrophizing and depression on physical therapy outcomes and to identify the baseline factors predictive of poor outcomes in patients with knee OA. STUDY DESIGN: This research used a prospective, cohort, observational study design. SETTING: The research took place in an outpatient physical therapy unit within a tertiary hospital in Ankara, Turkey. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with knee OA underwent 10 sessions of physical therapy. At baseline, depression and pain catastrophizing were evaluated using the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). The therapeutic efficacy of physical therapy was assessed based on the level of pain and disability using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Changes in the VAS score and WOMAC were evaluated at 2 and 6 weeks following physical therapy. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the predictors of poor outcomes. RESULTS: Patients with low pain-catastrophizing and low depression scores tended to demonstrate better improvement at weeks 2 and 6. The results of a multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the significant outcome predictor for both pain and function at week 6 was the baseline PCS score. The baseline depression score was not an independent predictor of a clinically poor outcome. LIMITATIONS: This study is limited owing to the combined use of several physical therapy modalities and short follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the baseline PCS score is a predictive factor of poor response to physical therapy in patients with knee OA. Considering this factor before therapy and taking the necessary precautions may improve the outcomes of physical therapy. KEY WORDS: Catastrophization, central nervous system sensitization, depression, disability evaluation, knee osteoarthritis, pain, physical therapy modalities, transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation.


Asunto(s)
Catastrofización/psicología , Depresión/psicología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/psicología , Manejo del Dolor/psicología , Dolor/psicología , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Catastrofización/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Depresión/epidemiología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/epidemiología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/terapia , Dolor/epidemiología , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Turquía/epidemiología
18.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 101(5): 750-761, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32004517

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of chronic pain self-management support with pain science education and exercise (COMMENCE) on improving function, pain interference, work status, pain intensity, fatigue, psychological factors associated with pain, health care visits, satisfaction, and perceived change compared with usual care. DESIGN: Parallel group randomized controlled trial with 1- and 12-week follow-ups. SETTING: Community health center. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=102) with chronic noncancer pain referred for self-management support. Eighty of 102 participants completed 12-week follow-up assessments. No participants withdrew with adverse events. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to COMMENCE or usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: Function measured using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment-Dysfunction Index. Secondary: Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment-Bother Index, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference, work status, numeric pain, and fatigue rating scales, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Pain Self-Efficacy Scale, Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire, number of health care visits, satisfaction, and global rating of change. RESULTS: COMMENCE resulted in greater improvements in function (mean difference [MD] at 12-wk follow-up=-8.0; 95% CI, -14.7 to -1.3), bother with functional difficulties (MD, -12.0; 95% CI, -20.8 to -3.2), pain intensity (MD, -1.0; 95% CI, -2.1 to -0.1), catastrophizing (MD , -8.2; 95% CI, -14.5 to -2.0), self-efficacy (MD, 7.0; 95% CI, 0.8-13.2), knowledge (MD, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.6-3.9), satisfaction (MD, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.7-1.8), and perceived change (MD, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.8-2.1). There were no significant between-group differences in pain interference, work, fatigue, depressive symptoms, or health care visits. CONCLUSION: COMMENCE is more effective than usual care at improving function, pain, catastrophic thinking, self-efficacy, pain knowledge, satisfaction, and perceived change but not pain interference, work status, fatigue, depressive symptoms, or health care visits.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/rehabilitación , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Terapia por Ejercicio , Automanejo , Catastrofización/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Fatiga/epidemiología , Femenino , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Multimorbilidad , Ontario/epidemiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Satisfacción del Paciente , Autoeficacia
19.
Pain Med ; 21(4): 814-821, 2020 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32040150

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP) is the unexplained pain along the territory of the trigeminal nerve, including nonorganic tooth pain called atypical odontalgia (AO). Though PIFP is debilitating to patients' livelihood and well-being, its pathophysiology remains poorly understood. Although neurovascular compression (NVC) of the trigeminal nerve is known to be associated with trigeminal neuralgia (TN), the relationship between NVC and other orofacial pains has not been fully elucidated. METHODS: In this study, we investigated the differences in the characteristics of PIFP (primarily AO) patients in the presence or absence of NVC. A retrospective analysis was performed on data from 121 consecutive patients who had been diagnosed with unilateral PIFP according to the criteria of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD)-3 and underwent magnetic resonance imaging scans of the head. RESULTS: In the group without NVC, characteristic findings were significant for psychiatric morbidity, somatization, and pain disability, when compared with the group with NVC. Furthermore, the group without NVC exhibited significant headache, noncardiac chest pain, shortness of breath, and pain catastrophizing. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that PIFP patients can be divided into two groups: one consistent with a neuropathic pain phenotype when NVC is present and a functional somatic symptom phenotype when presenting without NVC. Our findings may enable a more precise understanding of pathophysiology of PIFP and lead to better treatment strategies.


Asunto(s)
Neuralgia Facial/fisiopatología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Síndromes de Compresión Nerviosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Odontalgia/fisiopatología , Nervio Trigémino/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Trastorno Bipolar/epidemiología , Trastorno Bipolar/psicología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Catastrofización/epidemiología , Catastrofización/psicología , Dolor en el Pecho/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Disnea/epidemiología , Neuralgia Facial/complicaciones , Neuralgia Facial/epidemiología , Neuralgia Facial/psicología , Femenino , Cefalea/epidemiología , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndromes de Compresión Nerviosa/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos Somatomorfos/epidemiología , Trastornos Somatomorfos/psicología , Odontalgia/epidemiología , Odontalgia/psicología
20.
Pain Pract ; 20(5): 471-479, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31999892

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: (1) To investigate the prevalence of poor sleep quality and (2) to explore the associations between clinical, cognitive, and emotional factors and quality of sleep in patients with chronic widespread pain (CWP) receiving multidisciplinary treatment. METHOD: Baseline data were used from 163 patients with CWP referred for multidisciplinary treatment. Linear regression models were used to assess the relationship of clinical (pain, fatigue, pain interference, and disability), emotional (anxiety, depression, and psychological distress), and cognitive factors (catastrophizing, acceptance, self-efficacy, kinesiophobia and illness beliefs) with sleep quality, as measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. RESULTS: Poor sleep quality was found in 92% of the patients. The multivariable model showed that a higher level of fatigue (b = 1.77, standard error [SE] = 0.62, ß = 0.21, t = 2.87, P < 0.01), psychological distress (b = 0.02, SE = 0.01, ß = 0.27, t = 3.50, P < 0.01), and more concerns about the illness (b = 0.46, SE = 0.18, ß = 0.20, t = 2.57, P = 0.01) were independently associated with poorer quality of sleep. The overall linear regression model explains 27.9% of sleep quality. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of poor sleep quality in patients with CWP referred for multidisciplinary treatment emphasizes the need to target sleep during treatment. Further research is needed to disentangle the cause-effect relationship between fatigue, psychological distress, and concerns about the illness and poor sleep (note: this abstract has been published before [Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:A1788]).


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/complicaciones , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Sueño , Adulto , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Catastrofización/epidemiología , Fatiga/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...