Cefepime-taniborbactam and CERTAIN-1: Can we treat carbapenem-resistant infections?

Wagenlehner and colleagues1 demonstrated non-inferiority and superiority with respect to a primary endpoint of composite success (microbiological plus clinical) of cefepime/taniborbactam vs. meropenem in treating complicated urinary tract infections and acute pyelonephritis caused by carbapenem-susceptible gram-negative bacteria in adults. A major area of interest in real-world application of cefepime/taniborbactam is its potential role in treating carbapenem-resistant infections, which deserves further investigation.

Antimicrobial activity of cefepime-tazobactam combination against extended spectrum beta-lactamase and/or AmpC beta-lactamase- producing gram-negative bacilli.

BACKGROUND: The problem of resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, which is caused by ESBL and AmpC ß-lactamases, is getting worse globally. Infections caused by bacterial isolates harboring these enzymes are difficult to treat with carbapenems being the sole effective treatment option for such infections. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of ESBLs and AmpC-producing Gram-negative bacilli isolated from clinical specimens and to evaluate the sensitivity of cefepime-tazobactam combination against them. METHODS: This is an observational cross-sectional study carried out on 100 Gram-negative bacilli at Theodor Bilharz Research Institute Hospital during the period from February 2015 to January 2016. ESBL production was screened by using the disc diffusion test followed by confirmation by the combined disc confirmatory test, the screening for AmpC production was conducted using the cefoxitin disc test, which was subsequently confirmed by the AmpC disc test. Isolates confirmed positive for ESBL and/ or AmpC production were investigated for their susceptibility to antibiotics. RESULTS: Among 100 Gram-negative bacilli, 44 isolates were confirmed as ESBL producers by the combined disc confirmatory test out of 56 isolates that tested positive for ESBL production through the disc diffusion test. The presence of AmpC production was assessed using the cefoxitin disc test, 32 isolates were screened to be AmpC producers, and the AmpC disc test confirmed AmpC production in 9 isolates of them. Using the Mast® D68C set, 32 isolates were ESBL producers, 3 were AmpC producers, and 4 isolates were ESBL/AmpC co-producers. The highest sensitivity was to cefepime-tazobactam (91.48%) followed by the carbapenems. CONCLUSION: Cefepime-tazobactam showed remarkable activity against ESBL and/or AmpC-producing Gram-negative bacilli and may be considered as a therapeutic alternative to carbapenems.

Activity of cefiderocol and innovative ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations against isogenic strains of Escherichia coli expressing single and double ß-lactamases under high and low permeability conditions.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the impact of the most clinically relevant ß-lactamases and their interplay with low outer membrane permeability on the activity of cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/enmetazobactam, cefepime/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, meropenem/xeruborbactam and meropenem/nacubactam against recombinant Escherichia coli strains. METHODS: We constructed 82 E. coli laboratory transformants expressing the main ß-lactamases circulating in Enterobacterales (70 expressing single ß-lactamase and 12 producing double carbapenemase) under high (E. coli TG1) and low (E. coli HB4) permeability conditions. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was determined by reference broth microdilution. RESULTS: Aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/zidebactam, cefiderocol, meropenem/xeruborbactam and meropenem/nacubactam were active against all E. coli TG1 transformants. Imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, cefepime/taniborbactam and cefepime/enmetazobactam were also highly active, but unstable against most of MBL-producing transformants. Combination of ß-lactamases with porin deficiency (E. coli HB4) did not significantly affect the activity of aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/zidebactam, cefiderocol or meropenem/nacubactam, but limited the effectiveness of the rest of carbapenem- and cefepime-based combinations. Double-carbapenemase production resulted in the loss of activity of most of the compounds tested, an effect particularly evident for those E. coli HB4 transformants in which MBLs were present. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the promising activity that cefiderocol and new ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors have against recombinant E. coli strains expressing widespread ß-lactamases, including when these are combined with low permeability or other enzymes. Aztreonam/avibactam, cefiderocol, cefepime/zidebactam and meropenem/nacubactam will help to mitigate to some extent the urgency of new compounds able to resist MBL action, although NDM enzymes represent a growing challenge against which drug development efforts are still needed.

In vitro development of resistance against antipseudomonal agents: comparison of novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations and other ß-lactam agents.

We subjected seven P. aeruginosa isolates to a 10-day serial passaging against five antipseudomonal agents to evaluate resistance levels post-exposure and putative resistance mechanisms in terminal mutants were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing analysis. Meropenem (mean, 38-fold increase), cefepime (14.4-fold), and piperacillin-tazobactam (52.9-fold) terminal mutants displayed high minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values compared to those obtained after exposure to ceftolozane-tazobactam (11.4-fold) and ceftazidime-avibactam (5.7-fold). Fewer isolates developed elevated MIC values for other ß-lactams and agents belonging to other classes when exposed to meropenem in comparison to other agents. Alterations in nalC and nalD, involved in the upregulation of the efflux pump system MexAB-OprM, were common and observed more frequently in isolates exposed to ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem. These alterations, along with ones in mexR and amrR, provided resistance to most ß-lactams and levofloxacin but not imipenem. The second most common gene altered was mpl, which is involved in the recycling of the cell wall peptidoglycan. These alterations were mainly noted in isolates exposed to ceftolozane-tazobactam and piperacillin-tazobactam but also in one cefepime-exposed isolate. Alterations in other genes known to be involved in ß-lactam resistance (ftsI, oprD, phoP, pepA, and cplA) and multiple genes involved in lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis were also present. The data generated here suggest that there is a difference in the mechanisms selected for high-level resistance between newer ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations and older agents. Nevertheless, the isolates exposed to all agents displayed elevated MIC values for other ß-lactams (except imipenem) and quinolones tested mainly due to alterations in the MexAB-OprM regulators that extrude these agents.

Effect of modification of penicillin-binding protein 3 on susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, and cefiderocol of Escherichia coli strains producing broad-spectrum ß-lactamases.

The impact of penicillin-binding protein 3 (PBP3) modifications that may be identified in Escherichia coli was evaluated with respect to susceptibility to ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations including ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, and to cefiderocol. A large series of E. coli recombinant strains producing broad-spectrum ß-lactamases was evaluated. While imipenem-relebactam showed a similar activity regardless of the PBP3 background, susceptibility to other molecules tested was affected at various levels. This was particularly the case for ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam, and cefepime-taniborbactam.

Deciphering mechanisms affecting cefepime-taniborbactam in vitro activity in carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas spp. isolates recovered during a surveillance study in Spain.

PURPOSE: To characterize the resistance mechanisms affecting the cefepime-taniborbactam combination in a collection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas spp. (predominantly P. aeruginosa; CRPA) clinical isolates. METHODS: CPE (n = 247) and CRPA (n = 170) isolates were prospectively collected from patients admitted to 8 Spanish hospitals. Susceptibility to cefepime-taniborbactam and comparators was determined by broth microdilution. Cefepime-taniborbactam was the most active agent, inhibiting 97.6% of CPE and 67.1% of CRPA (MICs ≤ 8/4 mg/L). All isolates with cefepime-taniborbactam MIC > 8/4 mg/L (5 CPE and 52 CRPA) and a subset with MIC ≤ 8/4 mg/L (23 CPE and 24 CRPA) were characterized by whole genome sequencing. RESULTS: A reduced cefepime-taniborbactam activity was found in two KPC-ST307-Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates with altered porins [KPC-62-K. pneumoniae (OmpA, OmpR/EnvZ), KPC-150-K. pneumoniae (OmpK35, OmpK36)] and one each ST133-VIM-1-Enterobacter hormaechei with altered OmpD, OmpR, and OmpC; IMP-8-ST24-Enterobacter asburiae; and NDM-5-Escherichia coli with an YRIN-inserted PBP3 and a mutated PBP2. Among the P. aeruginosa (68/76), elevated cefepime-taniborbactam MICs were mostly associated with GES-5-ST235, OXA-2+VIM-2-ST235, and OXA-2+VIM-20-ST175 isolates also carrying mutations in PBP3, efflux pump (mexR, mexZ) and AmpC (mpl) regulators, and non-carbapenemase-ST175 isolates with AmpD-T139M and PBP3-R504C mutations. Overall, accumulation of these mutations was frequently detected among non-carbapenemase producers. CONCLUSIONS: The reduced cefepime-taniborbactam activity among the minority of isolates with elevated cefepime-taniborbactam MICs is not only due to IMP carbapenemases but also to the accumulation of multiple resistance mechanisms, including PBP and porin mutations in CPE and chromosomal mutations leading to efflux pumps up-regulation, AmpC overexpression, and PBP modifications in P. aeruginosa.

Rapid AMR prediction in Pseudomonas aeruginosa combining MALDI-TOF MS with DNN model.

BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a significant clinical pathogen that poses a substantial threat due to its extensive drug resistance. The rapid and precise identification of this resistance is crucial for effective clinical treatment. Although matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has been used for antibiotic susceptibility differentiation of some bacteria in recent years, the genetic diversity of P. aeruginosa complicates population analysis. Rapid identification of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in P. aeruginosa based on a large amount of MALDI-TOF-MS data has not yet been reported. In this study, we employed publicly available datasets for P. aeruginosa, which contain data on bacterial resistance and MALDI-TOF-MS spectra. We introduced a deep neural network model, synergized with a strategic sampling approach (SMOTEENN) to construct a predictive framework for AMR of three widely used antibiotics. RESULTS: The framework achieved area under the curve values of 90%, 85%, and 77% for Tobramycin, Cefepime, and Meropenem, respectively, surpassing conventional classifiers. Notably, random forest algorithm was used to assess the significance of features and post-hoc analysis was conducted on the top 10 features using Cohen's d. This analysis revealed moderate effect sizes (d = 0.5-0.8) in Tobramycin and Cefepime models. Finally, putative AMR biomarkers were identified in this study. CONCLUSIONS: This work presented an AMR prediction tool specifically designed for P. aeruginosa, which offers a hopeful pathway for clinical decision-making.

Antibiotic therapy for nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli infections: future perspectives.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Serious infections caused by nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NF-GNB) pose a significant challenge for clinicians due to the limited treatment options available, which are frequently associated with issues of toxicity and unfavourable pharmacokinetic profiles. The aim of this review is to provide a brief overview of the existing data concerning the ongoing development of antiinfective agents targeting NF-GNB. RECENT FINDINGS: Several agents exhibiting efficacy against NF-GNB are under clinical investigation. Durlobactam-sulbactam and cefepime-taniborbactam emerge as promising therapeutic avenues against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanii . Cefepime-zidebactam may serve as a suitable treatment option for urinary tract infections caused by a wide range of NF-GNB. Cefepime-enmetazobactam demonstrates potent in vitro activity against various NF-GNB strains; however, its role as an anti- Pseudomonal agent is inadequately substantiated by available data. Xeruborbactam is a wide ß-lactamase inhibitor that can be associated with a range of agents, enhancing in-vitro activity of these against many NF-GNB, including those resistant to newer, broader spectrum options. Lastly, murepavadin appears to be a potential pathogen-specific solution for severe Pseudomonas infections; however, additional investigation is necessary to establish the safety profile of this compound. SUMMARY: Each of the novel molecules reviewed possesses an interesting range of in-vitro activity against NF-GNB. In addition, some of them have already been proved effective in vivo, underscoring their potential as future treatment options.

In vitro synergy of the combination of sulbactam-durlobactam and cefepime at clinically relevant concentrations against A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales.

BACKGROUND: Sulbactam-durlobactam is a potent combination active against Acinetobacter baumannii; however, it lacks activity against other nosocomial pathogens. Cefepime is a common first-line therapy for hospital/ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by Gram-negative pathogens including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales. With increasing resistance to cefepime, and the significant proportion of polymicrobial nosocomial infections, effective therapy for infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii, P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales is needed. This study investigated the in vitro synergy of sulbactam-durlobactam plus cefepime against relevant pathogens. METHODS: Static time-kills assays were performed in duplicate against 14 cefepime-resistant isolates (A. baumannii, n = 4; P. aeruginosa, n = 4; Escherichia coli, n = 3; Klebsiella pneumoniae, n = 3). One WT K. pneumoniae isolate was included. Antibiotic concentrations simulated the free-steady state average concentration of clinically administered doses in patients. RESULTS: Sulbactam-durlobactam alone showed significant activity against A. baumannii consistent with the MIC values. Sulbactam-durlobactam plus cefepime showed synergy against one A. baumannii isolate with an elevated MIC to sulbactam-durlobactam (32 mg/L). Against all P. aeruginosa isolates, synergy was observed with sulbactam-durlobactam plus cefepime. For the Enterobacterales, one E. coli isolate demonstrated synergy while the others were indifferent due to significant kill from sulbactam-durlobactam alone. The combination of sulbactam-durlobactam plus cefepime showed synergy against one of the K. pneumoniae and additive effects against the other two K. pneumoniae tested. No antagonism was observed in any isolates including the WT strain. CONCLUSIONS: Synergy and no antagonism was observed with a combination of sulbactam-durlobactam and cefepime; further in vivo pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics data and clinical correlation are necessary to support our findings.

In vivo Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis of the Efficacy of the Cefepime/Nacubactam Combination Against ß-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales based on the Instantaneous MIC Concept.

PURPOSE: Nacubactam (NAC) is a novel diazabicyclooctane ß-lactamase inhibitor used in combination with cefepime (CFPM). In this study, we aimed to determine the target pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) values of CFPM/NAC in mice infected with ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, such as the carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales. METHODS: Three strains of ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, Klebsiella pneumoniae MSC 21444, Escherichia coli MSC 20662, and K. pneumoniae ATCC BAA-1898, were used for checkerboard assays and fractionation studies and dose-range studies. A PK study was performed in neutropenic mice. Additionally, PK/PD analysis was performed based on the instantaneous minimum inhibitory concentration (MICi) concept. RESULTS: Checkerboard measurements revealed that higher NAC concentrations decreased the CFPM MIC in a concentration-dependent manner. In all tested strains, fT > MICi calculated from the PK experiments showed a high correlation with the mean change in the bacterial count of thigh-infected mice in the in vivo PD study, suggesting that fT > MICi is an optimal PK/PD parameter for monitoring the CFPM/NAC combination. The target fT > MICi values for CFPM/NAC to achieve a bacteriostatic effect, 1-log10-kill, and 2-log10-kill values were 30, 49, and 94%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that fT > MICi is a PK/PD parameter is suitable for monitoring the CFPM/NAC combination. The minimum target value for achieving a static effect against ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales is 30%.

Examining the activity of cefepime-taniborbactam against Burkholderia cepacia complex and Burkholderia gladioli isolated from cystic fibrosis patients in the United States.

The novel clinical-stage ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combination, cefepime-taniborbactam, demonstrates promising activity toward many Gram-negative bacteria producing class A, B, C, and/or D ß-lactamases. We tested this combination against a panel of 150 Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) and Burkholderia gladioli strains. The addition of taniborbactam to cefepime shifted cefepime minimum inhibitory concentrations toward the provisionally susceptible range in 59% of the isolates tested. Therefore, cefepime-taniborbactam possessed similar activity as first-line agents, ceftazidime and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, supporting further development.

Effects of antimicrobial therapy duration and class on risk of antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacillus bloodstream infection in patients with AML.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (ARGNB) bloodstream infection (BSI) has been associated with prior antibiotic exposure among hematologic malignancy patients. The relationships between days of therapy (DOT), antimicrobial class, and ARGNB BSI risk are poorly understood. METHODS: This is a single-center, case-control study of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients including 115 cases with ARGNB BSI and 230 matched controls with non-ARGNB BSI between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2018. Fixed- and mixed-effects logistic regression was used to examine relationships between antibiotic DOT and risk of ARGNB BSI. Admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) within 7 days, 30-day mortality, and Pitt Bacteremia Score (PBS) were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Prior isolation of a antimicrobial-resistant organism (ARO) (OR 4.45 95% CI 1.46, 13.54), surgery within 90 days (OR 3.71, 95% CI 1.57, 8.73), aminoglycoside DOT (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.05, 1.23), cefepime DOT (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05, 1.13), and carbapenem DOT (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05, 1.16) were associated with increased odds of ARGNB BSI. Days since last antibiotic administration (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97, 0.99) and inpatient days within 90 days (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.93, 0.98) showed reduced odds of ARGNB BSI. Total antimicrobial DOT regardless of class was not associated with ARGNB BSI. ARGNB BSI was associated with increased 30-day mortality (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.57, 5.22) CONCLUSIONS: Among AML patients with GNB BSI, greater DOT of aminoglycosides, cefepime, and carbapenems in the 90 days prior to BSI were associated with increased odds of ARGNB BSI.

Compassionate use of a novel ß-lactam enhancer-based investigational antibiotic cefepime/zidebactam (WCK 5222) for the treatment of extensively-drug-resistant NDM-expressing Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in an intra-abdominal infection-induced sepsis patient: a case report.

Infections in critically-ill patients caused by extensively-drug-resistant (XDR)-Pseudomonas aeruginosa are challenging to manage due to paucity of effective treatment options. Cefepime/zidebactam, which is currently in global Phase 3 clinical development (Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT04979806, registered on July 28, 2021) is a novel mechanism of action based ß-lactam/ ß-lactam-enhancer combination with a promising activity against a broad-range of Gram-negative pathogens including XDR P. aeruginosa. We present a case report of an intra-abdominal infection-induced sepsis patient infected with XDR P. aeruginosa and successfully treated with cefepime/zidebactam under compassionate use. The 50 year old female patient with past-history of bariatric surgery and recent elective abdominoplasty and liposuction developed secondary pneumonia and failed a prolonged course of polymyxins. The organism repeatedly isolated from the patient was a New-Delhi metallo ß-lactamase-producing XDR P. aeruginosa resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam, susceptible only to cefepime/zidebactam. As polymyxins failed to rescue the patient, cefepime/zidebactam was administered under compassionate grounds leading to discharge of patient in stable condition. The present case highlights the prevailing precarious scenario of antimicrobial resistance and the need for novel antibiotics to tackle infections caused by XDR phenotype pathogens.

Antimicrobial activity and pathogen mutation prevention of originator and generics of cefepime, linezolid and piperacillin/tazobactam against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.

OBJECTIVES: Although generic medicinal products are required to have the same qualitative and quantitative composition of the active substance as their reference originator product, patients and health care professionals express concerns about their interchangeability and safety. Therefore, the present study investigated the antimicrobial activity and pathogen mutation prevention of original and generic cefepime, linezolid and piperacillin/tazobactam against Staphylococcus aureus. METHODS: Two generic formulations of cefepime, linezolid and piperacillin/tazobactam were tested against their respective originator products. Susceptibility testing was performed with twenty-one clinical isolates of S. aureus and ATCC-29213 using broth microdilution. Time kill curves (TKC) were performed with ATCC-29213 at drug concentrations above and below the respective minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC). Mutation prevention concentration was determined for each drug formulation against ATCC-29213. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Mutant colonies from mutation prevention concentration (MPC) experiments were genotypically tested by sequence analysis. RESULTS: MIC ratios between contiguous originator and generic drugs were similar for each isolate. No visual differences were observed in TKCs between originator and generic substances. The MPC did not differ between different formulations of the same substance. Although sequence analysis of mutant colonies revealed genomic differences compared with the original ATCC-29213, no differences in mutation frequencies were observed between clinical isolates and ATCC-29213 treated with originator or generic substances. CONCLUSIONS: Similar antimicrobial activity and pathogen mutation prevention was observed between contiguous substances. These results support the interchangeability of generic and originator drug formulations with the same active ingredient.

Determination of potential combination of non-ß-lactam, ß-lactam, and ß-lactamase inhibitors/ß-lactam enhancer against class D oxacillinases producing Acinetobacter baumannii: Evidence from in-vitro, molecular docking and dynamics simulation.

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, a predominant nosocomial pathogen in hospitals of intensive care units, is associated with bacteremia and ventilator-associated pneumonia with a high-risk mortality rate. To increase the effectiveness of the ß-lactam (BL) antibiotics, the use of ß-lactamase inhibitors (BLI) acts as a booster when given in combination with BL antibiotics. To this aspect, we selected BL antibiotics of cefiderocol, cefepime, non-BL antibiotic eravacycline, BLI of durlobactam, avibactam, and a ß-lactam enhancer (BLE) of zidebactam. To prove our hypothesis, we determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of various BL or non-BL/BLI or BLE combinations using broth microdilution method followed by in silico analysis of molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, and molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM-PBSA) identifies the potential combination. In MIC testing, eravacycline, cefepime/zidebactam, cefiderocol/zidebactam, and eravacycline in combination with zidebactam or durlobactam were found to be effective against oxacillinases (OXAs) (OXA-23/24/58 like) expressing A. baumannii isolates. The docking results of the selected ligands toward OXA-23, OXA-24, and OXA-58 had an excellent binding score ranging from -5.8 to -9.3 kcal/mol. Further, the docked complexes were subjected and evaluated using gromacs for molecular dynamics simulation of 50 ns toward selected class D OXAs. The binding energies obtained from MM-PBSA shed light on the binding efficiencies of each non-BL, BL, and BLI/BLE, thereby helping us to propose the drug combinations. Based on the MD trajectories scoring acquired, we propose using eravacycline, cefepime/zidebactam, cefiderocol/zidebactam, and eravacycline in combination with durlobactam or zidebactam would be promising for treating OXA-23, OXA-24, and OXA-58 like expressing A. baumannii infections.

Impact of Acquired Broad Spectrum ß-Lactamases on Susceptibility to Novel Combinations Made of ß-Lactams (Aztreonam, Cefepime, Meropenem, and Imipenem) and Novel ß-Lactamase Inhibitors in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

The impact of broad-spectrum ß-lactamases on the susceptibility to novel ß-lactamase/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations was evaluated both in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli using isogenic backgrounds. Cefepime-zidebactam displayed low MICs, mainly due to the significant intrinsic antibacterial activity of zidebactam. Cefepime-taniborbactam showed excellent activity against recombinant E. coli strains, including metallo-ß-lactamase producers, whereas aztreonam-avibactam remained the best therapeutic option against class B ß-lactamase-producing P. aeruginosa.

Molecular characterization of cefepime and aztreonam nonsusceptibility in Haemophilus influenzae.

BACKGROUND: Cefepime and aztreonam are highly efficacious against H. influenzae, and resistant strains are rare. In this study, we isolated cefepime- and aztreonam-nonsusceptible H. influenzae strains and addressed the molecular basis of their resistance to cefepime and aztreonam. METHODS: Two hundred and 28 specimens containing H. influenzae were screened, of which 32 isolates were enrolled and applied to antimicrobial susceptibility testing and whole-genome sequencing. Genetic variations that were detected in all nonsusceptible isolates with statistical significance by Fisher's exact tests were identified as cefepime or aztreonam nonsusceptibility related. Functional complementation assays were conducted to assess the in vitro effects of proteins with sequence substitutions on drug susceptibility. RESULTS: Three H. influenzae isolates were nonsusceptible to cefepime, one of which was also nonsusceptible to aztreonam. Genes encoding TEM, SHV and CTX-M extended-spectrum ß-lactamases were not detected in the cefepime- and aztreonam-nonsusceptible isolates. Five genetic variations in four genes and 10 genetic variations in five genes were associated with cefepime and aztreonam nonsusceptibility, respectively. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that changes in FtsI were correlated strongly with the MIC of cefepime and moderately with aztreonam. FtsI Thr532Ser-Tyr557His cosubstitution linked to cefepime nonsusceptibility and Asn305Lys-Ser385Asn-Glu416Asp cosubstitution to aztreonam nonsusceptibility. Functional complementation assays revealed that these cosubstitutions increased MICs of cefepime and aztreonam in susceptible H. influenzae isolates, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic variations relevant to resistant phenotypes of cefepime and aztreonam nonsusceptibility in H. influenzae were identified. Moreover, the effects of FtsI cosubstitutions on increasing MICs of cefepime and aztreonam in H. influenzae were demonstrated.

In vitro activity of cefepime/zidebactam and cefepime/taniborbactam against aztreonam/avibactam-resistant NDM-like-producing Escherichia coli clinical isolates.

BACKGROUND: Aztreonam/avibactam is one of the last therapeutic options for treating infections caused by NDM-like-producing Enterobacterales. However, PBP3-modified and NDM-producing Escherichia coli strains that co-produce CMY-42 have been shown to be resistant to this drug combination. The aim of our study was to assess the in vitro activity of cefepime/taniborbactam and cefepime/zidebactam against such aztreonam/avibactam-resistant E. coli strains. METHODS: MIC values of aztreonam, aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime, cefepime/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam and zidebactam alone were determined for 28 clinical aztreonam/avibactam-resistant E. coli isolates. Those isolates produced either NDM-5 (n = 24), NDM-4 (n = 2) or NDM-1 (n = 2), and they all co-produced CMY-42 (n = 28). They all harboured a four amino acid insertion in PBP-3 (Tyr-Arg-Ile-Asn or Tyr-Arg-Ile-Lys). RESULTS: All strains were resistant to aztreonam/avibactam and cefepime, as expected. The resistance rate to cefepime/taniborbactam was 100%, with MIC50 and MIC90 being at 16 mg/L and 64 mg/L, respectively. Conversely, all strains were susceptible to cefepime/zidebactam, with both MIC50 and MIC90 at 0.25 mg/L. Notably, all strains showed low MICs for zidebactam alone, with MIC50 and MIC90 at 0.5 mg/L and 1 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Our data highlighted the excellent in vitro performance of the newly developed ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination cefepime/zidebactam against aztreonam/avibactam-resistant E. coli strains, suggesting that this combination could be considered as an efficient therapeutic option in this context. Our study also highlights the cross-resistance between acquired resistance to aztreonam/avibactam and the cefepime/taniborbactam combination.

Effect of 2-chloro-N-(4-fluoro-3-nitrophenyl)acetamide in combination with antibacterial drugs against Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a species of Gram-negative bacteria related to a wide range of infections and high rates of drug resistance. The combined use of antibacterial agents is one of the strategies that has been analyzed in recent years as part of the alternatives in the treatment of drug-resistant infections. Recently, the antibacterial activity of of 2-chloro-N-(4-fluoro-3-nitrophenyl)acetamide has been demonstrated against K. pneumoniae, also indicating that this acetamide did not show significant cytotoxic potential in preliminary tests. Thus, it becomes an interesting substance for future studies that explore its antimicrobial capacity, including investigating its association with antibacterial drugs. Based on this, this research aimed to analyze the effects of the association of 2-chloro-N-(4-fluoro-3-nitrophenyl)acetamide (CFA) with ciprofloxacin, cefepime, ceftazidime, meropenem and imipenem against K. pneumoniae strains. The results showed additivity when the substance was combined with ciprofloxacin and cefepime, indifference when associated with ceftazidime and synergistic effect when combined with meropenem and imipenem. Thus, the acetamide was able to optimize the effects of antibacterial drugs, reducing the concentrations necessary to cause bacterial death. These data indicate a potential future clinical use of these combinations, and further studies are needed to analyze this viability.