Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.193
Filtrar
1.
N Z Med J ; 137(1594): 31-42, 2024 May 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696830

RESUMEN

AIM: Our antimicrobial guidelines (AGs) were changed in 2021 to recommend once-daily ceftriaxone in place of three-times-daily cefuroxime as preferred cephalosporin. This analysis sought to assess the effects of this on incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCR-E) and resource utilisation. METHOD: Before and after analysis of 30-day CDI and 3GCR-E incidence following receipt of cefuroxime/ceftriaxone pre- and post-AG change. Total nursing time and waste production relating to cefuroxime/ceftriaxone delivery were calculated pre- and post-change. RESULTS: CDI incidence was 0.6% pre- and 1.0% post-change (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.44, p=0.07) and 3GCR-E incidence 3.5% and 3.1% (aOR 0.90, p=0.33). Mean per-quarter estimated nursing administration time decreased from 2,065 to 1,163 hours (902 nurse-hour reduction) and antibiotic-related waste generation from 1,131kg to 748kg (383kg reduction). Overall days of therapy per-quarter of cefuroxime/ceftriaxone were unchanged between periods. CONCLUSION: This simplification of our AG from a three-times-daily to a once-daily antibiotic resulted in considerable savings for our hospital (roughly 1.7 full-time equivalent nurses and over a tonne of waste yearly), with no significant increases in CDI or 3GCR-E. The impact of dosing schedules on non-antibiotic-spectrum factors, such as nursing time and resource usage, is worthy of consideration when designing AGs.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Ceftriaxona , Cefuroxima , Humanos , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Cefuroxima/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Ceftriaxona/uso terapéutico , Ceftriaxona/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Infecciones por Clostridium/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Incidencia , Anciano , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Esquema de Medicación
2.
Helicobacter ; 29(2): e13073, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38601987

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection and its associated diseases represent a significant global health concern. Patients who cannot use amoxicillin pose a therapeutic challenge and necessitate alternative medications. Preliminary research indicates that cefuroxime demonstrates promising potential for eradicating H. pylori infection, and there is a lack of comprehensive review articles on the use of cefuroxime. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study conducts a thorough systematic literature review and synthesis. A comprehensive systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biology Medicine disc, and Wanfang Data up to January 13, 2024. The search strategy utilized the following keywords: (Cefuroxime) AND (Helicobacter pylori OR Helicobacter nemestrinae OR Campylobacter pylori OR Campylobacter pylori subsp. pylori OR Campylobacter pyloridis OR H. pylori OR Hp) for both English and Chinese language publications. Sixteen studies from five different countries or regions were included in final literature review. RESULTS: Analysis results indicate that H. pylori is sensitive to cefuroxime, with resistance rates similar to amoxicillin being relatively low. Regimens containing cefuroxime have shown favorable eradication rates, which were comparable to those of the regimens containing amoxicillin. Regarding safety, the incidence of adverse reactions in cefuroxime-containing eradication regimens was comparable to that of amoxicillin-containing regimens or other bismuth quadruple regimens, with no significant increase in allergic reactions in penicillin-allergic patients. Regarding compliance, studies consistently report high compliance rates for regimens containing cefuroxime. CONCLUSION: Cefuroxime can serve as an alternative to amoxicillin for the patients allergic to penicillin with satisfactory efficacies, safety, and compliance.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Humanos , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Bismuto/efectos adversos , Penicilinas/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico
3.
Spine J ; 24(6): 961-968, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38301900

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Surgical site infections (SSI) are one of the common complications following spinal fusion surgery. Unfortunately, several studies had shown conflicting results regarding optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) administration. Due to limitations in population homogeneity and sample size, these studies have not provided significant statistical correlations or clear practical recommendations. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the impact of timing of cefuroxime SAP on the risk of SSI in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery, and to determine the optimal timing of administration. DESIGN: Retrospective nested case-control study. PATIENT SAMPLE: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery at our institution between October 2011 and October 2021. OUTCOME MEASURE: In the current study, the primary outcome measure was SSI. METHODS: This was a retrospective nested case-control study. All consecutive patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery at our institution between October 2011 and October 2021 formed a retrospective cohort. For each SSI case, 2 controls free of SSI at the time of the index date of their corresponding case were selected, matched by age, sex, and calendar year. Electronic record and radiographic data were reviewed retrospectively in electronic database. SAP related data included timing of administration, preoperative dose, intraoperative second dose, and postoperative use. To examine the effects of mismatched variables, we further adjusted for possible confounding factors using conditional logistic regression models. Subsequently, subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the statistical associations. RESULTS: According to the preplanned statistical scheme and matching factors, we matched 236 controls for these SSI cases, and the subsequent statistical analysis was performed on these 354 patients. After adjusting for confounding factors, the results indicated that the risk of SSI was 70% higher in the group receiving SAP 31 to 60 minutes before incision compared to the group receiving SAP 0 to 30 minutes before incision (OR=1.732, 95%CI 1.031-2.910, p=.038). Additionally, the risk of SSI was 150% higher in the group receiving SAP 61 to 120 minutes before incision compared to the group receiving SAP 0 to 30 minutes before incision (OR=2.532, 95%CI 1.250-5.128, p=.010). In subgroup analysis, this statistical trend persisted for both deformity surgeries and different SSI classifications. CONCLUSION: Administering cefuroxime SAP within 30 minutes before skin incision significantly reduces the risk of SSI, whether they are deep or superficial, in spinal fusion surgery. This pattern remains consistent among spinal deformity patients.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica , Cefuroxima , Fusión Vertebral , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Cefuroxima/administración & dosificación , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Factores de Tiempo
5.
Georgian Med News ; (342): 113-121, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37991965

RESUMEN

Urinary tract infection in pregnancy is a common microbial infection. Antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens is becoming a major health problem worldwide. The antimicrobial agents used to manage urinary tract infections during pregnancy should be carefully chosen. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the bacterial profile, antibiotic susceptibility pattern, and factors associated with urinary tract infection among pregnant women at Hosanna town public health facilities. A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March to August 2022 on a total of 312 pregnant women who attended antenatal care at Hosanna Town public health facilities. Sociodemographic, clinical data, and related information were collected by using a pre-tested questionnaire. In addition, mid-stream urine specimens were collected from study participants. Bacterial pathogens were identified by standard bacteriological techniques. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by using the Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method. The data were analyzed by using SPSS version 25. Chi-square and odds ratios were calculated and a P-value≤0.05 at a 95% confidence interval was considered statistically significant. The results were presented with words and tables. Of a total of pregnant women, 59/312(18.9%) (95% CI: 14.7-23.7) were found to have significant bacteriuria. The predominant isolates were Escherichia coli (E. coli) 22(34.4%), followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) 10(15.6%), Staphylococci aureus (S. aureus) 7(10.9%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) 6(9.4%). Overall, 78.1% of these isolates were multidrug-resistant (MDR). Gram-negative bacteria were susceptible to meropenem (97.6%), gentamicin (85.7%), nitrofurantoin (82.1%), ciprofloxacin (73.8%), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (73.8%) and ceftriaxone (71.8%), but highly resistant to ampicillin (95.5%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (74.4%), doxycycline (71.8%), cefuroxime (69.2%), and cephalexin (69.2%). The gram-positive bacteria were susceptible to gentamicin (86.4%), erythromycin (81.8%), and nitrofurantoin (77.3%): whereas they showed a high level of resistance to penicillin (72.7%), doxycycline (54.5%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (52.9%), and cefoxitin (52.9%). No formal education for the participant (AOR: 2.86, 95% CI: 1.03-7.98, p=0.044), family monthly income <1500 birr (AOR: 3.19, 95% CI: 1.48-6.89, p=0.003), and previous history of UTI (AOR: 4.52, 95% CI: 2.04-10.03, p=0.001) were significantly associated with bacteriuria. This study revealed a high prevalence of bacterial urinary tract infection among pregnant women and low susceptibility to ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, cefuroxime, and cephalexin. Therefore, regularly, culture-based bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing should be performed. Alternatively, empiric antibiotic therapy should consider the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant uropathogens and the factor that may increase the urinary tract infection occurrence due to multi-drug resistant uropathogens.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriuria , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Infecciones Urinarias , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriuria/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriuria/epidemiología , Bacteriuria/microbiología , Nitrofurantoína/uso terapéutico , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/uso terapéutico , Mujeres Embarazadas , Escherichia coli , Staphylococcus aureus , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Doxiciclina/uso terapéutico , Etiopía/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Bacterias , Ampicilina/uso terapéutico , Gentamicinas/uso terapéutico , Cefalexina/uso terapéutico
6.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 18031, 2023 10 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37865682

RESUMEN

Our purpose was to compare postoperative infectious endophthalmitis rates before and after the introduction of antibiotic prophylaxis via intracameral with cefuroxime (ATB-P IC) in a high-volume cataract surgery service. Retrospective cohort study considering patients who underwent cataract surgery at Ophthal Hospital Especializado, São Paulo, Brazil, from January/2011 to December/2019. Patients operated from 2013 to 2019 comprised the ATB-P IC group while those operated from 2011 to 2013 formed the control group without the ATB-P IC protocol. A total of 23,184 cataract surgeries were included, with 6,207 in the Control Group and 16,977 in the ATB-P Group. A significantly higher rate of endophthalmitis was observed in the control group (0.0967%) when compared to the ATB-P group (0.0177%) (p = 0.014). Surgeries performed with ATB-P showed 80% less chance of reported endophthalmitis (OR = 0.20; 95% CI 0.05-0.72; p = 0.014) than those without ATB-P. Of the six cases confirmed by culture in the control group, all tested positive for Pseudomonas aeroginosa and the only case confirmed by culture in the ATB-P group was positive for Staphylococcus epidermidis. Our findings strongly support the use of intracameral antibiotic prophylaxis with cefuroxime to reduce postoperative infectious endophthalmitis rates, and we recommend its incorporation into cataract surgery protocols.


Asunto(s)
Extracción de Catarata , Catarata , Endoftalmitis , Humanos , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Brasil , Extracción de Catarata/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Endoftalmitis/epidemiología , Endoftalmitis/etiología , Endoftalmitis/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Cámara Anterior
7.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 12(1): 106, 2023 09 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37749585

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the association between post-appendectomy SSI rates and the two most commonly used regimens for perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in Swiss children. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, analysing data from the Swiss national SSI surveillance database with a study period from 2014 to 2018. All hospitals undertaking paediatric appendectomies in Switzerland participate in the surveillance. We compared the cumulative incidence and odds of post-appendectomy SSI within 30 days of surgery in children ≤ 16 years of age undergoing appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis and receiving perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis with cefuroxime plus metronidazole or with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid using multivariable adjusted logistic regression and propensity-score matching. RESULTS: A total of 6207 cases were recorded in the study time frame. Overall SSI cumulative incidence was 1.9% (n = 119). 4256 children (54.9% male, median (IQR) age 12 [10, 14] years) received either cefuroxime plus metronidazole (n = 2348, 53.8% male) or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (n = 1491, 57.0% male). SSI cumulative incidence was 1.1% (25/2348) among children receiving cefuroxime plus metronidazole and 2.8% (42/1491, p < 0.001) when receiving amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. The administration of cefuroxime plus metronidazole was associated with statistically significantly lower SSI odds compared to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (aOR 0.35, 95%CI [0.20, 0.61], p < 0.001), and this was confirmed upon propensity-score matching. CONCLUSION: We found lower odds of post-appendectomy SSI in children receiving cefuroxime plus metronidazole compared to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Treating amoxicillin/clavulanic acid as the baseline, only 55 children need to receive cefuroxime plus metronidazole perioperative prophylaxis to avert one SSI. Existing guidelines recommending amoxicillin/clavulanic acid may need to be revised. Trial registration ISRCTN47727811, registered retrospectively.


Asunto(s)
Metronidazol , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Niño , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Suiza/epidemiología , Combinación Amoxicilina-Clavulanato de Potasio/uso terapéutico
8.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 12(1): 105, 2023 09 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37726838

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare intravenous (IV) amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (A/CA) to IV cefuroxime plus metronidazole (C + M) for preventing surgical site infections (SSI) in colorectal surgery. BACKGROUND: Given their spectra that include most Enterobacterales and anaerobes, C + M is commonly recommended as prophylaxis of SSI in colorectal surgery. A/CA offers good coverage of Enterobacterales and anaerobes as well, but, in contrast to C + M, it also includes Enterococcus faecalis which is also isolated from patients with SSI and could trigger anastomotic leakage. METHODS: Data from a Swiss SSI surveillance program were used to compare SSI rates after class II (clean contaminated) colorectal surgery between patients who received C + M and those who received A/CA. We employed multivariable logistic regression to adjust for potential confounders, along with propensity score matching to adjust for group imbalance. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2018, 27,922 patients from 127 hospitals were included. SSI was diagnosed in 3132 (11.2%): 278/1835 (15.1%) in those who received A/CA and 2854/26,087 (10.9%) in those who received C + M (p < 0.001). The crude OR for SSI in the A/CA group as compared to C + M was 1.45 [CI 95% 1.21-1.75]. The adjusted OR was 1.49 [1.24-1.78]. This finding persisted in a 1:1 propensity score matched cohort of 1835 patients pairs with an OR of 1.60 [1.28-2.00]. Other factors independently associated with SSI were an ASA score > 2, a longer duration of operation, and a reoperation for a non-infectious complication. Protective factors were female sex, older age, antibiotic prophylaxis received 60 to 30 min before surgery, elective operation, and endoscopic approach. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its activity against enterococci, A/CA was less effective than C + M for preventing SSI, suggesting that it should not be a first choice antibiotic prophylaxis for colorectal surgery.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Cirugía Colorrectal , Gammaproteobacteria , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Cirugía Colorrectal/efectos adversos , Combinación Amoxicilina-Clavulanato de Potasio/uso terapéutico
9.
Cir Pediatr ; 36(3): 122-127, 2023 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37417216

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the results of a clinical guideline for the treatment and early discharge of patients with complicated acute appendicitis in terms of infectious complications and hospital stay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A guideline for appendicitis treatment according to severity was created. Complicated appendicitis cases were treated with ceftriaxone-metronidazole for 48h, with discharge being approved if certain clinical and blood test criteria were met. A retrospective analytical study comparing the incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) and surgical site infection (SSI) in patients under 14 years of age to whom the new guideline was applied (Group A) vs. the historical cohort (Group B, treated with gentamicin-metronidazole for 5 days) was carried out. A prospective cohort study to assess which antibiotic therapy (amoxicillin-clavulanic acid or cefuroxime-metronidazole) proved more effective in patients meeting early discharge criteria was also conducted. RESULTS: 205 patients under 14 years of age were included in Group A, whereas 109 patients were included in Group B. IAA was present in 14.3% of patients from Group A vs. 13.8% from Group B (p= 0.83), while SSI was present in 1.9% of patients from Group A vs. 8.25% from Group B (p= 0.008). Early discharge criteria were met by 62.7% of patients from Group A. Median hospital stay decreased from 6 to 3 days. At discharge, 57% of patients received amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, whereas 43% received cefuroxime-metronidazole, with no differences being found in terms of SSI (p= 0.24) or IAA (p= 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Early discharge reduces hospital stay without increasing the risk of postoperative infectious complications. Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid is a safe option for at-home oral antibiotic therapy.


OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar los resultados en términos de complicaciones infecciosas y estancia hospitalaria de la instauración de una guía clínica para el tratamiento y alta precoz en pacientes con apendicitis aguda complicada. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Se elaboró una guía para el tratamiento de las apendicitis en función de su grado de severidad. Las complicadas se trataron con ceftriaxona-metronidazol durante 48 h, siendo alta si cumplen ciertos criterios clínicos y analíticos. Se realizó un estudio analítico retrospectivo comparando la incidencia de abscesos intraabdominales postquirúrgicos (AIA) e infección del sitio quirúrgico (ISQ) en pacientes menores de 14 años sometidos a la nueva guía (Grupo A), respecto a una cohorte histórica (Grupo B), en la que la pauta de tratamiento era gentamicina-metronidazol 5 días. Además, se realizó un estudio de cohortes prospectivas para evaluar qué antibioterapia (amocilina-clavulánico o cefuroxima-metronidazol) es más eficaz en los pacientes que cumplen criterios de alta precoz. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 205 pacientes menores de 14 años en el Grupo A y 109 en el Grupo B. Presentaron AIA un 14,3% en el grupo A, frente al 13,8% en el B (p=  0,83); e ISQ un 1,9% y un 8,25% respectivamente (p=  0,008). Cumplieron criterios de alta precoz el 62,7% de los pacientes del Grupo A. La mediana de estancia disminuyó a de 6 a 3 días. Al alta, el 57% recibieron amoxicilina-clavulánico y el 43% cefuroxima-metronidazol, sin hallarse diferencias en términos de ISQ (p=  0,24) ni de AIA (p=  0,12). CONCLUSIONES: El alta precoz disminuye la estancia hospitalaria sin aumentar el riesgo de complicaciones infecciosas postquirúrgicas. La amoxicilina-clavulánico es una opción segura para la antibioterapia oral domiciliaria.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , Metronidazol , Humanos , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Apendicitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Apendicitis/cirugía , Combinación Amoxicilina-Clavulanato de Potasio/uso terapéutico , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Antibacterianos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Apendicectomía/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 9405, 2023 06 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37296185

RESUMEN

It has been revealed that the administration of an antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP) reduces the rate of surgical site (SSI) following colorectal cancer surgery. Nevertheless, the optimal timing of this medication remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine more precisely the optimal time for administering antibiotics and to see if this could reduce the number of possible surgical site infections. The files of individuals who underwent colorectal cancer surgery at the University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel (Germany) between 2009 and 2017 were analyzed. Piperacillin/tazobactam, cefuroxime/metronidazole and mezlocillin/sulbactam were administered as AP regimens. Timing of AP was obtained. The primary objective was the rate of SSIs based on CDC criteria. Multivariate analysis took place to identify risk factors for SSIs. A total of 326 patients (61.4%) received an AP within 30 min, 166 (31.3%) between 30 and 60 min, 22 (4.1%) more than 1 h before surgery, and 15 (2.8%) after surgery. In 19 cases (3.6%) a SSI occurred during hospital stay. A multivariate analysis did not identify AP timing as a risk factor for the occurrence of SSIs. With significance, more surgical site occurrences (SSO) were diagnosed when cefuroxime/metronidazole was given. Our results suggest that AP with cefuroxime/metronidazole is less effective in reducing SSO compared with mezlocillin/sulbactam and tazobactam/piperacillin. We assume that the timing of this AP regimen of < 30 min or 30-60 min prior to colorectal surgery does not impact the SSI rate.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Humanos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Metronidazol , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sulbactam/uso terapéutico , Mezlocilina , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperacilina , Tazobactam
11.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(6): e2317370, 2023 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37289455

RESUMEN

Importance: World Health Organization guidelines recommend administering surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP), including cefuroxime, within 120 minutes prior to incision. However, data from clinical settings supporting this long interval is limited. Objective: To assess whether earlier vs later timing of administration of cefuroxime SAP is associated with the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSI). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included adult patients who underwent 1 of 11 major surgical procedures with cefuroxime SAP, documented by the Swissnoso SSI surveillance system between January 2009 and December 2020 at 158 Swiss hospitals. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to April 2023. Exposures: Timing of cefuroxime SAP administration before incision was divided into 3 groups: 61 to 120 minutes before incision, 31 to 60 minutes before incision, and 0 to 30 minutes before incision. In addition, a subgroup analysis was performed with time windows of 30 to 55 minutes and 10 to 25 minutes as a surrogate marker for administration in the preoperating room vs in the operating room, respectively. The timing of SAP administration was defined as the start of the infusion obtained from the anesthesia protocol. Main Outcomes and Measures: Occurrence of SSI according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions. Mixed-effects logistic regression models adjusted for institutional, patient, and perioperative variables were applied. Results: Of 538 967 surveilled patients, 222 439 (104 047 men [46.8%]; median [IQR] age, 65.7 [53.9-74.2] years), fulfilled inclusion criteria. SSI was identified in 5355 patients (2.4%). Cefuroxime SAP was administered 61 to 120 minutes prior to incision in 27 207 patients (12.2%), 31 to 60 minutes prior to incision in 118 004 patients (53.1%), and 0 to 30 minutes prior to incision in 77 228 patients (34.7%). SAP administration at 0 to 30 minutes was significantly associated with a lower SSI rate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93; P < .001), as was SAP administration 31 to 60 minutes prior to incision (aOR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.98; P = .01) compared with administration 61 to 120 minutes prior to incision. Administration 10 to 25 minutes prior to incision in 45 448 patients (20.4%) was significantly associated with a lower SSI rate (aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97; P = .009) vs administration within 30 to 55 minutes prior to incision in 117 348 patients (52.8%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, administration of cefuroxime SAP closer to the incision time was associated with significantly lower odds of SSI, suggesting that cefuroxime SAP should be administrated within 60 minutes prior to incision, and ideally within 10 to 25 minutes.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Cefuroxima , Estados Unidos , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Anciano , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico
12.
Braz J Microbiol ; 54(2): 1287-1294, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37079272

RESUMEN

Nocardia are ubiquitous, saprophytic and opportunistic bacteria. They cause a set of pyogenic clinical infections in animals and humans, particularly immunocompromised patients, mostly affecting the skin and respiratory tract, with refractoriness to conventional therapy. The most descriptions of nocardial infections in companion animals involve case reports, and there are scarce case series studies focused on canine and feline nocardiosis in which diagnosis has been based on molecular techniques. We investigated epidemiological aspects, clinical findings, in vitro susceptibility profile, and molecular identification of Nocardia using PCR-based method targeted 16S rRNA gene in twelve dogs and two cats. Among dogs were observed cutaneous lesions (8/12 = 67%), pneumonia (3/12 = 25%), and encephalitis (2/12 = 17%), whereas cats developed cutaneous lesions and osteomyelitis. Nocardia and canine morbillivirus coinfection was described in six dogs (6/12 = 50%). A high mortality rate (6/8 = 75%) was seen among dogs. Three dogs (3/4 = 75%) and one cat (1/2 = 50%) with systemic signs (pneumonia, encephalitis, osteomyelitis), and 83% (5/6) of dogs with a history of concomitant morbillivirus infection died. N. nova (5/12 = 42%), N. cyriacigeorgica (3/12 = 25%), N. farcinica (2/12 = 17%), N. veterana (1/12 = 8%), and N. asteroides (1/12 = 8%) species were identified in dogs, whereas N. africana and N. veterana in cats. Among the isolates from dogs, cefuroxime (12/12 = 100%), amikacin (10/12 = 83%), gentamycin (10/12 = 83%), and imipenem (10/12 = 83%) were the most effective antimicrobials, whereas cefuroxime, cephalexin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, imipenem, and gentamycin were efficient against isolates from cats. Multidrug resistance was observed in 36% (5/14) of isolates. We describe a variety of Nocardia species infecting dogs and cats, multidrug-resistant ones, and a high mortality rate, highlighting a poor prognosis of nocardiosis in companion animals, particularly among animals systemically compromised or coinfected by canine morbillivirus. Our study contributes to species identification, in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility profile, clinical-epidemiological aspects, and outcome of natural Nocardia-acquired infections in dogs and cats.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Enfermedades de los Gatos , Enfermedades de los Perros , Nocardiosis , Nocardia , Osteomielitis , Gatos , Animales , Perros , Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades de los Gatos/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de los Gatos/microbiología , Cefuroxima/farmacología , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Enfermedades de los Perros/microbiología , Nocardiosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Nocardiosis/veterinaria , Nocardiosis/microbiología , Antiinfecciosos/farmacología , Osteomielitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Imipenem/farmacología , Imipenem/uso terapéutico , Gentamicinas/farmacología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana
13.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 23(1): 175, 2023 Apr 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37095479

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Management of pterygium is dependent on the grading of pterygium and its clinical presentation (inflamed or quiescent), and surgical excision is the final choice of treatment for the pterygium extending beyond the limbus. Infectious keratitis is one of the most commonly reported complications in recent years. To the best of our knowledge, Klebsiella keratitis after pterygium surgery has not been described in the current literature. Here, we report a patient with corneal ulcer formation following pterygium surgical excision. CASE PRESENTATION: A 62-year-old woman presented with complaints of pain, blurred vision, photophobia and redness in her left eye for a month. She had a history of pterygium surgical excision two months ago. Slit-lamp examination showed conjunctival congestion, a central whitish corneal ulcer with a central epithelial defect, and hypopyon. Corneal scraped sample revealed multidrug resistant (MDR) Klebsiella pneumonia and the strain was found to be sensitive to cefoxitin and ciprofloxacin. Intracameral cefuroxime (1 mg/0.1 mL) injection, fortified cefuroxime ophthalmic suspension (50 mg/mL) and moxifloxacin ophthalmic suspension (0.5%) were successfully administered to control the infection. Since residual central stromal opacification remained persistent, final visual acuity did not improve beyond finger counting at two meters. CONCLUSIONS: Klebsiella keratitis is a rare and sight-threatening complication following pterygium excision. This report emphasizes the importance of close follow-up examination following pterygium surgeries.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera de la Córnea , Queratitis , Pterigion , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera de la Córnea/tratamiento farmacológico , Pterigion/cirugía , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Klebsiella , Trastornos de la Visión
14.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 78(5): 1175-1181, 2023 05 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36897327

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Standard once-daily dosing of ceftriaxone may not lead to adequate antibiotic exposure in all cases of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB). Therefore, we compared clinical effectiveness of empirical antibiotic treatment with flucloxacillin, cefuroxime and ceftriaxone in adult patients with MSSA bacteraemia. METHODS: We analysed data from the Improved Diagnostic Strategies in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (IDISA) study, a multicentre prospective cohort study of adult patients with MSSA bacteraemia. Duration of bacteraemia and 30 day SAB-related mortality were compared between the three groups using multivariable mixed-effects Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: In total, 268 patients with MSSA bacteraemia were included in the analyses. Median duration of empirical antibiotic therapy was 3 (IQR 2-3) days in the total study population. Median duration of bacteraemia was 1.0 (IQR 1.0-3.0) day in the flucloxacillin, cefuroxime and ceftriaxone groups. In multivariable analyses, neither ceftriaxone nor cefuroxime was associated with increased duration of bacteraemia compared with flucloxacillin (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.73-1.60 and HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.88-1.71). In multivariable analysis, neither cefuroxime nor ceftriaxone was associated with higher 30 day SAB-related mortality compared with flucloxacillin [subdistribution HR (sHR) 1.37, 95% CI 0.42-4.52 and sHR 1.93, 95% CI 0.67-5.60]. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we could not demonstrate a difference in duration of bacteraemia and 30 day SAB-related mortality between patients with SAB empirically treated with flucloxacillin, cefuroxime or ceftriaxone. Since sample size was limited, it is possible the study was underpowered to find a clinically relevant effect.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Adulto , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus , Meticilina/uso terapéutico , beta-Lactamas/uso terapéutico , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Floxacilina/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Ceftriaxona/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico
15.
Helicobacter ; 28(2): e12956, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36752304

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication in penicillin-allergic patients is challenging. The effective regimen is lacking in areas with high antibiotic resistance and tetracycline unavailable. Minocycline, cefuroxime, and full-dose metronidazole are promising drugs. AIMS: To compare the eradication rate, safety, and compliance among three new bismuth quadruple therapies for first-line H. pylori eradication in penicillin-allergic patients. METHODS: This randomized trial was conducted on 450 naive patients with H. pylori infection and penicillin allergy. The 14-day minocycline-metronidazole-containing (minocycline 100 mg twice daily and metronidazole 400 mg four times/day), minocycline-cefuroxime-containing (minocycline 100 mg twice daily and cefuroxime 500 mg twice daily), and cefuroxime-metronidazole-containing (cefuroxime 500 mg twice daily and metronidazole 400 mg four times/day) bismuth quadruple therapies were randomly assigned to the participants. Safety and compliance were assessed within 3 days after eradication. Urea breath test was performed 4-8 weeks after eradication to evaluate outcome. RESULTS: The differences of eradication rates in either intention-to-treat (84.0%, 82.7%, and 23 82.0%, p = .896) or per-protocol (91.7%, 90.9%, and 88.2%, p = .599) analysis among minocycline-metronidazole, minocycline-cefuroxime, and cefuroxime-metronidazole-containing bismuth quadruple therapies were statistically insignificant. The incidence of adverse events (35.1%, 22.6%, and 28.9%) and compliance (90.5%, 91.8%, and 91.9%) were similar. Taste distortion, nausea, and anorexia were more common in metronidazole-containing regimens, and dizziness was more common in minocycline-containing regimens. The allergy was rare (~3%). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacies of three bismuth quadruple therapies containing minocycline, cefuroxime, and full-dose metronidazole (pairwise) for first-line H. pylori eradication in penicillin-allergic patients were similarly satisfactory with relatively good safety and compliance. The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registration (ChiCTR1900023702).


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Hipersensibilidad , Humanos , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Penicilinas/efectos adversos , Bismuto/uso terapéutico , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Cefuroxima/farmacología , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Minociclina/farmacología , Minociclina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Tetraciclina/uso terapéutico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Resultado del Tratamiento , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico
16.
J Neurosurg Pediatr ; 31(1): 43-51, 2023 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36308474

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative infections in pediatric spinal surgery commonly occur and necessitate reoperation(s). However, pediatric-specific infection prophylaxis guidelines are not available. This network meta-analysis compares perioperative prophylaxis methods including Betadine irrigation, saline irrigation, intrawound vancomycin powder, combination therapy (Betadine, vancomycin, gentamicin, and cefuroxime), Betadine irrigation plus vancomycin powder, and no intervention to determine the most efficacious prevention method. METHODS: A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed, EBSCO, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for peer-reviewed articles published prior to February 2022 comparing two or more infection prophylaxis methods in patients younger than 22 years of age. Data were extracted for treatment modalities, patient demographics, and patient outcomes such as total number of infections, surgical site infections, deep infections, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, follow-up time, and postoperative complications. Quality and risk of bias was assessed using National Institutes of Health tools. A network meta-analysis was performed with reduction of infections as the primary outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 10 studies consisting of 5164 procedures were included. There was no significant difference between prophylactic treatment options in reduction of infection. However, three treatment options showed significant reduction in total infection compared with no prophylactic treatment: Betadine plus vancomycin (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.09-0.54), vancomycin (OR 3.26, 95% CI 1.96-5.44), and a combination therapy (Betadine, vancomycin, gentamicin, and cefuroxime) (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.75). P-Score hierarchical ranking estimated Betadine plus vancomycin to be the superior treatment to prevent total infections, deep infections, and surgical site infections (P-score 0.7876, 0.7175, and 0.7291, respectively). No prophylaxis treatment-related complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this network meta-analysis show the strongest support for Betadine plus vancomycin as a method to reduce infections following pediatric spinal surgery. There was heterogeneity among studies and inconsistent outcome reporting; however, three effective treatment options are identified.


Asunto(s)
Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Vancomicina , Humanos , Niño , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Povidona Yodada/uso terapéutico , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Polvos/uso terapéutico , Metaanálisis en Red , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Gentamicinas/uso terapéutico
17.
Int Wound J ; 20(5): 1376-1383, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36346142

RESUMEN

To assess the impact of cefuroxime injection of intracameral prophylaxis antibiotic on after endophthalmitis operative wound following surgery of cataract, we conducted a meta-analysis. A thorough review of the literature up to July 2022 revealed that there were 1 167 197 participants with surgery of cataract at the start of the research; 1 004 425 of these subjects received an injection of intracameral of cefuroxime, while 162 772 did not get an antibiotic as a control. Using dichotomous approaches and a random or fixed-effect model, odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to evaluate the impact of cefuroxime injection of intracameral prophylaxis antibiotic on after endophthalmitis operative wound following surgery of cataract. When comparing no antibiotic in participants who had surgery of cataract, the cefuroxime injection of intracameral significantly reduced the after endophthalmitis operative wound (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.07-0.29, P = 0.001) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 95%). When comparing participants who received no antibiotic after surgery of cataract, the after endophthalmitis operative wound from the cefuroxime injection of intracameral was considerably lower. Although none of the 22 studies encompassed in the meta-analysis had a study with a small sample size, it is nevertheless advisable to proceed with caution when analysing the results.


Asunto(s)
Catarata , Endoftalmitis , Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Catarata/tratamiento farmacológico , Endoftalmitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Endoftalmitis/prevención & control
18.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 17416, 2022 10 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36258003

RESUMEN

To reveal optimal antibiotic prophylactic regimen for postoperative endophthalmitis (POE), we conducted systematic review and network meta-analysis. A total of 51 eligible original articles, including two randomized controlled trials, were identified. In total, 4502 POE cases occurred in 6,809,732 eyes (0.066%). Intracameral injection of vancomycin had the best preventive effect (odds ratio [OR] 0.03, 99.6% confidence interval [CI] 0.00-0.53, corrected P-value = 0.006, P-score = 0.945) followed by intracameral injection of cefazoline (OR 0.09, 99.6% CI 0.02-0.42, corrected P-value < 0.001, P-score = 0.821), cefuroxime (OR 0.18, 99.6% CI 0.09-0.35, corrected P-value < 0.001, P-score = 0.660), and moxifloxacin (OR 0.36, 99.6% CI 0.16-0.79, corrected P-value = 0.003, P-score = 0.455). While one randomized controlled trial supported each of intracameral cefuroxime and moxifloxacin, no randomized controlled trial evaluated vancomycin and cefazoline. Sensitivity analysis focusing on the administration route revealed that only intracameral injection (OR 0.19, 99.4% CI 0.12-0.30, corrected P-value < 0.001, P-score = 0.726) significantly decreased the risk of postoperative endophthalmitis. In conclusion, intracameral injection of either vancomycin, cefazoline, cefuroxime, or moxifloxacin prevented POE.


Asunto(s)
Extracción de Catarata , Endoftalmitis , Humanos , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Vancomicina , Moxifloxacino/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Metaanálisis en Red , Extracción de Catarata/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Endoftalmitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Endoftalmitis/etiología , Endoftalmitis/prevención & control , Cámara Anterior , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico
19.
BMC Womens Health ; 22(1): 276, 2022 07 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35794560

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the differences in clinical features of patients with mastitis following Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii infection, and most focused on the bacterial antimicrobial susceptibility, detection methods and therapy. METHODOLOGY: There were 133 patients with mastitis infected by C. kroppenstedtii between August 2016 and September 2019. C. kroppenstedtii was identified using mass spectrometry. The demographics, clinical diagnosis, laboratory test results of different types of mastitis combined with bacillus infection, and the effects of different treatments in reducing recurrence were compared. RESULTS: The incidence of pus following C. kroppenstedtii infection was higher in patients with non-granulomatous lobular mastitis (NGLM; 56.6%) than in those with granulomatous lobular mastitis (GLM; 33.3%; χ2 = 7.072, p = 0.008). While C-reactive protein (CRP) was higher in the GLM group (12.50 mg/L) than in the NGLM group (6.05 mg/L; Z = - 2.187, p = 0.029). Treatment with local lavage (triamcinolone acetonide) and antibiotics (cefuroxime) showed a recurrent rate of 25.9% in C. kroppenstedtii infection. CONCLUSION: Increased pus, large masses, and an elevated CRP level may occur in patients with mastitis infected by C.kroppenstedtii. These clinical features may guide the determination of the bacterial infection in patients with mastitis. Combining an antibiotic with a triamcinolone acetonide lavage, preferably cefuroxime, may reduce the recurrence.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Corynebacterium , Mastitis Granulomatosa , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Corynebacterium , Infecciones por Corynebacterium/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Corynebacterium/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Corynebacterium/microbiología , Femenino , Mastitis Granulomatosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Supuración/tratamiento farmacológico , Triamcinolona Acetonida/uso terapéutico
20.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 22(10): 1465-1471, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35839791

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The benefit of antibiotic prophylaxis is uncertain when performing transperineal prostate biopsies. Judicious use of antibiotics is required as antimicrobial resistance increases worldwide. We aimed to assess whether antibiotic prophylaxis can be omitted when performing transperineal prostate biopsies under local anaesthesia as an outpatient procedure. METHODS: In this randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial, we aimed to enrol all patients with a suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing transperineal prostate biopsies at two hospitals in Norway and Germany. Patients with a high risk of infection or ongoing infection were excluded. Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive intramuscular (in Norway) or intravenous (in Germany) 1·5 g cefuroxime antibiotic prophylaxis or not. Follow-up assessments were done after 2 weeks and 2 months. The primary outcome was rate of sepsis or urinary tract infections requiring hospitalisation within 2 months. The secondary outcome was the rate of urinary tract infections not requiring hospitalisation. These outcomes were assessed in all eligible randomly allocated participants with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 4%. Biopsies were performed using an MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion transperineal technique under local anaesthesia. Patients with a positive MRI underwent 2-4 biopsies per target; in addition, 8-12 systematic biopsies were performed in biopsy naive and MRI-negative patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04146142. FINDINGS: Between Nov 11, 2019, and Feb 23, 2021, 792 patients were referred for biopsy, of whom 555 (70%) were randomly allocated to treatment groups. 277 (50%) patients received antibiotic prophylaxis and 276 (50%) did not; two (<1%) patients were excluded after randomisation because of unknown allergy to study drug. Sepsis or urinary tract infections requiring hospitalisation occurred in no patients given antibiotic prophylaxis (0%, 95% CI 0 to 1·37) or not given antibiotic prophylaxis (0%, 0 to 1·37; difference 0% [95% CI -1·37 to 1·37]). Urinary tract infections not requiring hospitalisation occurred in one patient given antibiotic prophylaxis (0·36%, 95% CI 0·01 to 2·00) and three patients not given antibiotic prophylaxis (1·09%, 0·37 to 3·15; difference 0·73% [95% CI -1·08 to 2·81]). The number needed to treat with antibiotic prophylaxis to avoid one infection was 137. INTERPRETATION: The non-inferiority margin of 4% was not exceeded, suggesting rates of infections were not higher in patients not receiving antibiotic prophylaxis before transperineal prostate biopsy than in those receiving it. Therefore, antibiotic prophylaxis might be omitted in this population. FUNDING: Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway and Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, Berlin, Germany.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Infecciones Urinarias , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Biopsia/efectos adversos , Biopsia/métodos , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Próstata , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...