Venlafaxine-Associated Rhabdomyolysis: A Literature Review.

PURPOSE: This systematic review aimed to investigate the clinical manifestations and characteristics of venlafaxine-associated rhabdomyolysis. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Elsevier, Science Direct, Embase, Springer Link, Wiley Online Library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases from the date of database inception to January 2023. Previously reported cases of venlafaxine-associated rhabdomyolysis were identified, and relevant data from these cases were collected for descriptive statistical analysis. Cases that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated to determine the correlation between adverse reactions and venlafaxine. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients with venlafaxine-associated rhabdomyolysis were included. None of these patients had a history of muscle pain or discomfort. Of the 12 patients, 5 patients received venlafaxine at doses of ≤225 mg/d, whereas the remaining 7 patients received doses exceeding 225 mg/d. The main clinical symptoms included myalgia, muscle weakness, and renal injury. All 12 patients discontinued venlafaxine and received symptomatic care. CONCLUSIONS: Venlafaxine, used either as a monotherapy or in combination with other drugs, may be associated with rhabdomyolysis. Creatine kinase levels may normalize or significantly decrease after discontinuation of venlafaxine and symptomatic treatment.

Venlafaxine aggravating interstitial pneumonia: A case report.

A 70-year-old male taking venlafaxine for depression developed interstitial pneumonia and was admitted with shortness of breath and dyspnea. A computed tomography (CT) chest scan showed diffuse multiple lung lesions in both lungs, suggesting interstitial changes with inflammation or exudation. Compared with the CT chest scan 1 month earlier, there were significant progresses and new findings. The clinical diagnosis was interstitial pneumonia with pulmonary infection. The patient had been treated with fluvoxamine 100 mg/day, duloxetine 60 mg/day, venlafaxine 75 mg/day for depression over the past 4 months. The exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia was suspected to be related to venlafaxine. Wheezing improved slightly after discontinuation of venlafaxine and treatment in the respiratory ICU. However, the patient could not tolerate the ICU environment, therefore became agitated, irritable, and anxious. Finally the patient gave up treatment and was discharged. Three months after discharge, the patient died of a sudden of interstitial pneumonia. A Naranjo assessment score of 3 was obtained, indicating a possible correlation between the patient's adverse drug reaction and the suspect drug.

Adherence, acceptability and tolerability of venlafaxine extended release at dose of 300 mg/day in patients with major depressive disorder.

Adherence to antidepressants is essential for good outcomes when treating depressive disorders.

Adverse drug events associated with nortriptyline compared with paroxetine and alternative medications in an older adult population: a retrospective cohort study in Southern California.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate risk for falls, fractures and syncope in older adult patients treated with nortriptyline compared with paroxetine and alternative medications. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The electronic medical record and prescription drug database of a large integrated healthcare system in Southern California. PARTICIPANTS: Ambulatory patients, age ≥65 years diagnosed with depression, anxiety disorder or peripheral neuropathy, dispensed one or more of ten study medications between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2018. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: HR for falls, fractures and syncope with exposure to study medications adjusted for patient demographic variables and comorbidities. RESULTS: Among 195 207 subjects, 19 305 falls, 15 088 fractures and 11 313 episodes of syncope were observed during the study period. Compared with the reference medication, nortriptyline, the adjusted HRs (aHRs) for falls were statistically significantly greater for: paroxetine (aHR 1.48, 95% CI 1.39 to 1.57), amitriptyline (1.20, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.33), venlafaxine (1.44, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.56), duloxetine (1.25, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.40), fluoxetine (1.51, 95% CI 1.44 to 1.59), sertraline (1.53, 95% CI 1.44 to 1.62), citalopram (1.61, 95% CI 1.52 to 1.71) and escitalopram (1.37, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.54), but not gabapentin (0.95, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.02). For fractures, compared with nortriptyline, aHRs were significantly greater for: paroxetine, venlafaxine, duloxetine, fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram and gabapentin, with aHRs ranging from 1.30 for gabapentin to 1.82 for escitalopram; risk was statistically similar for amitriptyline. For syncope, the aHRs were significantly greater for: paroxetine, venlafaxine, fluoxetine, sertraline and citalopram, with aHRs ranging from 1.19 for fluoxetine and paroxetine up to 1.30 for citalopram and sertraline; risk was similar for amitriptyline, duloxetine, escitalopram and gabapentin. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with therapeutic alternatives, nortriptyline was found to represent a lower risk for falls, fractures and syncope, versus comparator medications, except for a few instances that had equivalent risk. The risk for these adverse events from paroxetine was comparable to the alternative medications.

Status Cataplecticus Induced by an Abrupt Duloxetine Withdrawal-A Case Report.

ABSTRACT: In persons with narcolepsy type 1, sudden withdrawal of antidepressants can cause status cataplecticus. We describe a 77-year-old female patient with long-standing history of narcolepsy type 1 complaining of recurrent short sudden episodes of whole-body paralysis, with preserved consciousness and memory. Episodes started an hour after her family invited her to celebrate Mother's Day. One week prior, patient had abruptly discontinued duloxetine. Cataplectic episodes resolved within 24 hours after resumption of duloxetine and treatment of hypokalemia. Status cataplecticus has been reported after withdrawal of venlafaxine, fluoxetine, and clomipramine. This is the first report of status cataplecticus due to duloxetine withdrawal. We review the pathophysiology of antidepressant withdrawal-induced status cataplecticus. In persons with narcolepsy type 1, physicians discontinuing any antidepressant should counsel on adverse effects of antidepressant withdrawal and reduce the dose in tapering manner.

Evaluation and Comparison of Citalopram and Venlafaxine for Management of Hot Flashes in Women with Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Premature menopause and hot flashes are the main complications of breast cancer treatments. About 40 to 50 percent of breast cancer women who undergo chemotherapy are experiencing premature menopause symptoms, including hot flashes. Some endocrine therapies such as tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors are associated with induction or aggravating hot flashes. Hot flashes are often debilitating and significantly impair daily functions. Therefore many therapeutic options have been studied so far for the management of this adverse effect. However, there are still some clinical challenges in managing hot flashes in patients with breast cancer. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of venlafaxine and citalopram on hot flashes in breast cancer women receiving tamoxifen. DESIGN: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in forty-one, 35 to 65 years old female patients. The study lasted for four weeks, and the follow-up was for two months. Venlafaxine and citalopram treatments started with doses of 37.5 mg or 10 mg, respectively. Venlafaxine and citalopram dosages were increased in the second week to 75 and 20 mg, respectively. The study was conducted during the year 2017. KEY RESULTS: The results indicated that the total efficacy was significantly different in groups receiving citalopram, venlafaxine, and placebo. Total efficacy in the placebo group, venlafaxine, and citalopram was 14.3, 53.8, and 64.3%, respectively (p=0.02). During the second week, the efficacy in groups receiving citalopram, venlafaxine, and placebo was 57.1, 53.8, and 14.3%, respectively (p=0.04). Generally, both citalopram and venlafaxine were well tolerated. The associated adverse effects were mild to moderate in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although citalopram was associated with more adverse effects, including constipation, it was more effective in reducing the frequency of hot flashes when compared to venlafaxine or placebo.

Anxiety exacerbation in a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia receiving dasatinib and venlafaxine.

INTRODUCTION: Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) use leads to near-normal life expectancy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML); unfortunately for some patients, adverse drug effects (ADEs) and medication burden associated with TKI therapy can lead to decreased quality of life. Additionally, TKIs have drug interactions that may negatively impact patients' management of co-morbidities or lead to increased ADEs. CASE REPORT: A 65-year-old female with a history of anxiety treated and controlled with venlafaxine experienced increased and resistant anxiety and insomnia after starting dasatinib for CML. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: On dasatinib, the patient experienced worsening anxiety and insomnia. The stress of a new leukemia diagnosis, drug interactions, and ADEs from dasatinib were considered possible causes. Dose adjustments to dasatinib and venlafaxine were made to control the patient's symptoms. However, the patient's symptoms did not resolve. After being on dasatinib for 2.5 years, the patient discontinued TKI therapy due to being in a deep molecular remission and given ongoing challenges managing anxiety. Within 4 months of stopping dasatinib, the patient reported an improvement in anxiety and overall emotional wellbeing. She continues to feel better and remains in a complete molecular remission 20 months off treatment. DISCUSSION: This case demonstrates a possible previously unknown drug interaction with dasatinib as well as a possible rarely reported ADE of dasatinib. Additionally, it highlights the difficulties patients with psychiatric disorders may face on TKI therapy and challenges providers may have in identifying rare psychiatric ADEs, thus emphasizing the need for documentation of these types of cases.

Venlafaxine deprescribing and thyroid function.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This report highlights the effects of discontinuing venlafaxine on thyroid function in an older adult with previously well-managed Hashimoto thyroiditis and sleep apnea. DESIGN: Concurrent intervention. CASE STUDY: Setting Community-based psychiatry practice Patient - 66 year old female Intervention Over 8 months, a 66-year-old patient slowly reduced the venlafaxine dose. She was treated simultaneously for sleep apnea. Measurements Clinical data including venlafaxine and levothyroxine dosing, thyroid hormone laboratory values, subjective complaints, and objective electrocardiographic (ECG) findings were aggregated and analyzed. MAIN RESULTS: As venlafaxine dose was decreased over time, the patient complained of bounding heart palpitations shown to be premature ventricular contractions, and wide and narrow complex ventricular tachycardia on ECG. Thyroid-stimulating hormone decreased from a baseline value of 0.791 uIU/mL to a nadir of 0.18 uIU/mL during venlafaxine dosage reduction from 225 mg/day to 155 mg/day. Cardiac symptoms subsided following levothyroxine dosage reduction. CONCLUSIONS: There was a direct relationship between antidepressant dosage reduction and levothyroxine dosage requirements. Cautious monitoring is recommended during venlafaxine deprescribing in patients with pre-existing thyroid disease.

The risks of adverse events with venlafaxine and mirtazapine versus 'active placebo', placebo, or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder: a protocol for two separate systematic reviews with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder causes a great burden on patients and societies. Venlafaxine and mirtazapine are commonly prescribed as second-line treatment for patients with major depressive disorder worldwide. Previous systematic reviews have concluded that venlafaxine and mirtazapine reduce depressive symptoms, but the effects seem small and may not be important to the average patient. Moreover, previous reviews have not systematically assessed the occurrence of adverse events. Therefore, we aim to investigate the risks of adverse events with venlafaxine or mirtazapine versus 'active placebo', placebo, or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder in two separate systematic reviews. METHODS: This is a protocol for two systematic reviews with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. The assessments of the effects of venlafaxine or mirtazapine will be reported in two separate reviews. The protocol is reported as recommended by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols, risk of bias will be assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool version 2, clinical significance will be assessed using our eight-step procedure, and the certainty of the evidence will be assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. We will search for published and unpublished trials in major medical databases and trial registers. Two review authors will independently screen the results from the literature searches, extract data, and assess risk of bias. We will include published or unpublished randomised clinical trial comparing venlafaxine or mirtazapine with 'active placebo', placebo, or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder. The primary outcomes will be suicides or suicide attempts, serious adverse events, and non-serious adverse events. Exploratory outcomes will include depressive symptoms, quality of life, and individual adverse events. If feasible, we will assess the intervention effects using random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses. DISCUSSION: Venlafaxine and mirtazapine are frequently used as second-line treatment of major depressive disorder worldwide. There is a need for a thorough systematic review to provide the necessary background for weighing the benefits against the harms. This review will ultimately inform best practice in the treatment of major depressive disorder. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022315395.

Efficacy of Prophylactic High-Dose Gabapentin and Venlafaxine on Reducing Oral Mucositis Pain Among Patients Treated With Chemoradiation for Head and Neck Cancer: A Single-Institution, Phase 2, Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Given the paucity of level 1 evidence, the optimal regimen to control oral mucositis pain remains unclear. Although national guidelines allow consideration of prophylactic gabapentin, prior trials showed improved pain control with venlafaxine among patients with diabetic neuropathy. We sought to investigate the role of prophylactic high-dose gabapentin with venlafaxine to reduce oral mucositis pain among patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a single-institution, phase 2 randomized trial on nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with chemoradiation. Patients were randomized to either prophylactic gabapentin (3600 mg daily) with or without venlafaxine (150 mg daily). Primary endpoint was differences in pain levels at the end of chemoradiation. Secondary endpoint was toxicity profiles, quality of life changes, opioid use, and feeding tube placement. Differences between the 2 arms at multiple time points were evaluated using a generalized linear mixed regression model with Sidak correction. RESULTS: Between May 2018 and March 2021, a total of 62 patients were enrolled and evaluable for analysis (n = 32 for the gabapentin alone arm, n = 30 for the gabapentin + venlafaxine arm). Over 90% of patients tolerated gabapentin well. Head and neck pain level showed a mean value of 45 (standard deviation, 23) and 43 (standard deviation, 21) for the gabapentin alone and the gabapentin + venlafaxine arms, respectively (P = .65). No statistically significant differences were observed in adverse events, opioid use, feeding tube placement, or quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of venlafaxine to prophylactic gabapentin did not result in improvements in pain control and quality of life among patients with head and neck cancer.

Are all antidepressants the same? The consumer has a point.

BACKGROUND: Although a large variety of antidepressants agents (AD) with different mechanisms of action are available, no significant differences in efficacy and safety have been shown. However, there have been few attempts to incorporate data on subjective experiences under different AD. METHOD: We conducted a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the posts from the website www.askapatient.com from different AD. We reviewed a random sample of 1000 posts. RESULT: After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we included a final sample of 450 posts, 50 on each of the most used AD: sertraline, citalopram, paroxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, venlafaxine, duloxetine, mirtazapine, and bupropion. Bupropion, citalopram, and venlafaxine had the higher overall satisfaction ratings. Sertraline, paroxetine, and fluoxetine had high reports of emotional blunting, while bupropion very few. Overall satisfaction with AD treatment was inversely associated with the presence of the following side-effects: suicidality, irritability, emotional blunting, cognitive disturbances, and withdrawal symptoms. After adjusting for confounders, only emotional blunting was shown to be more frequently reported by users of serotonergic agents, as compared to non-serotoninergic agents. CONCLUSION: This research points out that the subjective experience of patients under treatment should be taken into consideration when selecting an AD as differences between agents were evident. In contrast to the more frequent treatment decisions, users might prefer receiving a non-serotoninergic agent over a serotonergic one due to their lower propensity to produce emotional blunting.

Venlafaxine-related galactorrhea in an adolescent female: A case report.

Hyperprolactinemia with galactorrhea is a well-documented adverse effect of some psychotropic medications. While advanced practice psychiatric nurses are likely familiar with hyperprolactinemia with galactorrhea as an adverse effect of antipsychotics, they may be less familiar with hyperprolactinemia with galactorrhea associated with antidepressants, an adverse effect that is far less common. Advanced practice psychiatric nurses must be able to identify hyperprolactinemia and galactorrhea in patients and must be able to evaluate and manage antidepressant-related hyperprolactinemia with galactorrhea. Thus, this case report describes hyperprolactinemia with galactorrhea in a teenage female prescribed venlafaxine for the treatment of major depressive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder. To our knowledge, this is the first case report that describes galactorrhea related to a reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) in an adolescent.

A case of mood disorder with severe side effects of antidepressants in association with resistance to thyroid hormone beta with a THRB mutation.

BACKGROUND: Although resistance to thyroid hormone beta (RTHß) is associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, there are few reports of other concomitant mood disorders in individuals with RTHß. CASE PRESENTATION: A 67-year-old woman who had been previously diagnosed with RTHß (Refetoff syndrome) came to our department as a depressed patient. She was hospitalized twice for depression and treated with antidepressants both times. Paroxetine (37.5 mg/day) treatment during the first hospitalization did not cause any side effects, but treatment with mirtazapine (15 mg/day) and venlafaxine (150 mg/day) during the second hospitalization caused clonus and disturbance of consciousness, and these adverse effects resulted in a prolonged period of hospitalization. Finally, the patient's symptoms were controlled with quetiapine (75 mg/day). CONCLUSION: Poor tolerability to antidepressants was observed, which may be related to thyroid hormone intolerance. Low doses of quetiapine may contribute to improvements in depression.

Asymptomatic syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) following duloxetine treatment for pain with depression: Two case reports.

BACKGROUND: Syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) is a common side effect in patients treated with SSRIs and venlafaxine, while there is little information on SIADH in the treatment of duloxetine for pain. CASE PRESENTATION: The patients were an 83-year-old Japanese male and a 71-year-old Japanese female. Several years earlier, they complained of pain. Accidentally, blood tests revealed hyponatremia of 110 mmol/L and 108 mmol/L 35 days and 40 days after initiating duloxetine 20 mg/day, respectively. The hyponatremia of both patients recovered after switching from duloxetine to mianserin. CONCLUSION: We conclude that asymptomatic SIADH was induced by use of duloxetine. Psychiatrists should be aware of this syndrome.