Can open cholecystectomy be taught by cadaveric simulation?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the current standard of treatment for surgical gallbladder removal as it has an overall improved post-operative recovery compared to Open Cholecystectomy (OC). This has resulted in the loss of exposure to surgical trainees and the associated technical skills and decision-making required to convert to OC. The aim of this study is to provide construct validity to the proposition that cadaveric simulation can be used successfully to teach and learn open cholecystectomy. METHODS: Participants (n = 25) were surveyed on a 9-point questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale to determine their opinion on cadaveric simulation as a tool for teaching OC. RESULTS: Overall respondents deemed the tool as highly translatable. There was no significant correlation in the responses between candidates versus tutors (P = 0.05, r = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of the survey revealed that participants agreed that cadaveric simulation is a positive learning tool to aid in OC.

Structured feedback and operative video debriefing with critical view of safety annotation in training of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The learning curve in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is lengthened compared to open surgery. It has been reported that structured feedback and training in teams of two trainees improves MIS training and MIS performance. Annotation of surgical images and videos may prove beneficial for surgical training. This study investigated whether structured feedback and video debriefing, including annotation of critical view of safety (CVS), have beneficial learning effects in a predefined, multi-modal MIS training curriculum in teams of two trainees. METHODS: This randomized-controlled single-center study included medical students without MIS experience (n = 80). The participants first completed a standardized and structured multi-modal MIS training curriculum. They were then randomly divided into two groups (n = 40 each), and four laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCs) were performed on ex-vivo porcine livers each. Students in the intervention group received structured feedback after each LC, consisting of LC performance evaluations through tutor-trainee joint video debriefing and CVS video annotation. Performance was evaluated using global and LC-specific Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills (OSATS) and Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) scores. RESULTS: The participants in the intervention group had higher global and LC-specific OSATS as well as global and LC-specific GOALS scores than the participants in the control group (25.5 ± 7.3 vs. 23.4 ± 5.1, p = 0.003; 47.6 ± 12.9 vs. 36 ± 12.8, p < 0.001; 17.5 ± 4.4 vs. 16 ± 3.8, p < 0.001; 6.6 ± 2.3 vs. 5.9 ± 2.1, p = 0.005). The intervention group achieved CVS more often than the control group (1. LC: 20 vs. 10 participants, p = 0.037, 2. LC: 24 vs. 8, p = 0.001, 3. LC: 31 vs. 8, p < 0.001, 4. LC: 31 vs. 10, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Structured feedback and video debriefing with CVS annotation improves CVS achievement and ex-vivo porcine LC training performance based on OSATS and GOALS scores.

Optimizing the consent process for emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy using an interactive digital education platform: a randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND: Informed consent is essential for any surgery. The use of digital education platforms (DEPs) can enhance patient understanding of the consent discussion and is a method to standardize the consent process in elective, ambulatory settings. The use of DEP as an adjunct to standard verbal consent (SVC) has not been studied in an acute care setting. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized control trial with patients presenting to the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital with acute biliary pathology requiring a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) between August 2021 and April 2023. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either a DEP module with SVC or SVC alone. Baseline procedure-specific knowledge and self-reported understanding of risks and benefits of LC were collected using a questionnaire. Primary outcome was immediate post-intervention knowledge assessed using a 21-question multiple choice questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were delayed procedure-specific knowledge and participants' satisfaction with the consent discussion. RESULTS: We recruited 79 participants and randomized them 1:1 into the intervention group (DEP + SVC, n = 40) and the control group (SVC, n = 39). Baseline demographics and baseline procedure-specific knowledge were similar between groups. The immediate post-intervention knowledge was significantly higher for participants in the intervention versus the control group with a Cohen's d effect size of 0.68 (85.2(10.6)% vs. 78.2(9.9)%; p = 0.004). Similarly, self-reported understanding of risks and benefits of LC was significantly greater for participants in the intervention versus the control group with a Cohen's effect size of 0.76 (68.5(16.4)% vs. 55.1(18.8)%; p = 0.001). For participants who completed the delayed post-intervention assessment (n = 29), there continued to be significantly higher retention of acquired knowledge in the intervention group with a Cohen's effect size of 0.61 (86.5(8.5)% vs. 79.8 (13.1)%; p = 0.024). There was no difference in participants' self-reported satisfaction with the consent discussion between groups (69.5(6.7)% vs. 67.2(7.7)%; p = 0.149). CONCLUSION: The addition of digital education platform to standard verbal consent significantly improves patient's early and delayed understanding of risks and benefits of LC in an acute care setting.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy critical view of safety (LC-CVS): a multi-national validation study of an objective, procedure-specific assessment using video-based assessment (VBA).

BACKGROUND: A novel 6-item objective, procedure-specific assessment for laparoscopic cholecystectomy incorporating the critical view of safety (LC-CVS OPSA) was developed to support trainee formative and summative assessments. The LC-CVS OPSA included two retraction items (fundus and infundibulum retraction) and four CVS items (hepatocystic triangle visualization, gallbladder-liver separation, cystic artery identification, and cystic duct identification). The scoring rubric for retraction consisted of poor (frequently outside of defined range), adequate (minimally outside of defined range) and excellent (consistently inside defined range) and for CVS items were "poor-unsafe", "adequate-safe", or "excellent-safe". METHODS: A multi-national consortium of 12 expert LC surgeons applied the OPSA-LC CVS to 35 unique LC videos and one duplicate video. Primary outcome measure was inter-rater reliability as measured by Gwet's AC2, a weighted measure that adjusts for scales with high probability of random agreement. Analysis of the inter-rater reliability was conducted on a collapsed dichotomous scoring rubric of "poor-unsafe" vs. "adequate/excellent-safe". RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was high for all six items ranging from 0.76 (hepatocystic triangle visualization) to 0.86 (cystic duct identification). Intra-rater reliability for the single duplicate video was substantially higher across the six items ranging from 0.91 to 1.00. CONCLUSIONS: The novel 6-item OPSA LC CVS demonstrated high inter-rater reliability when tested with a multi-national consortium of LC expert surgeons. This brief instrument focused on safe surgical practice was designed to support the implementation of entrustable professional activities into busy surgical training programs. Instrument use coupled with video-based assessments creates novel datasets with the potential for artificial intelligence development including computer vision to drive assessment automation.

Effect of video-based self-reflection on intraoperative skills: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The value of video-based self-assessment in enhancing surgical skills is uncertain. This study investigates the feasibility and estimates sample size for a full-scale randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of video-based self-assessment to improve surgical performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in trainees. METHODS: This parallel pilot randomized controlled trial included general surgery trainees performing supervised laparoscopic cholecystectomy randomized 1:1 to control (traditional intraoperative teaching) or intervention group (traditional teaching plus video-based self-assessment). Operative performance was measured by the attending surgeon blinded to group assignment at the time of surgery using standardized assessment tools (Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills and Operative Performance Rating System). The intervention group had access to their video recordings on a web-based platform for review and self-assessment using the same instruments. The primary outcome for the estimation of sample size was the difference in faculty-assessed final operative performance (third submitted case). Feasibility criteria included >85% participation, >85% adherence to case submission and >85% completion of self-assessment. RESULTS: Of 37 eligible trainees approached, 32 consented and were randomized (86%). There were 16 in the intervention group, 15 in the control group (55% male, 55% junior trainees), and 1 was excluded for protocol violation. Twenty-four (75%) of participants submitted 3 cases. Thirteen trainees (81%) accessed the platform and completed 26 (63.2%) case self-assessments. Fifty-five trainees per arm will be needed to power a full-scale laparoscopic cholecystectomy with Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills and 130 trainees per arm with Operative Performance Rating System as the assessment tool. CONCLUSION: This pilot study contributes important data to inform the design of an adequately powered randomized controlled trial of video-based self-assessment to improve trainee performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Although a priori trial feasibility criteria were not achieved, automated video capture and storage could significantly improve adherence in future trials.

Telestration with augmented reality improves the performance of the first ten ex vivo porcine laparoscopic cholecystectomies: a randomized controlled study.

INTRODUCTION: The learning curve in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is steep compared to open surgery. One of the reasons is that training in the operating room in MIS is mainly limited to verbal instructions. The iSurgeon telestration device with augmented reality (AR) enables visual instructions, guidance, and feedback during MIS. This study aims to compare the effects of the iSurgeon on the training of novices performing repeated laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) on a porcine liver compared to traditional verbal instruction methods. METHODS: Forty medical students were randomized into the iSurgeon and the control group. The iSurgeon group performed 10 LCs receiving interactive visual guidance. The control group performed 10 LCs receiving conventional verbal guidance. The performance assessment using Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills (OSATS) and Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) scores, the total operating time, and complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The iSurgeon group performed LCs significantly better (global GOALS 17.3 ± 2.6 vs. 16 ± 2.6, p ≤ 0.001, LC specific GOALS 7 ± 2 vs. 5.9 ± 2.1, p ≤ 0.001, global OSATS 25.3 ± 4.3 vs. 23.5 ± 3.9, p ≤ 0.001, LC specific OSATS scores 50.8 ± 11.1 vs. 41.2 ± 9.4, p ≤ 0.001) compared to the control group. The iSurgeon group had significantly fewer intraoperative complications in total (2.7 ± 2.0 vs. 3.6 ± 2.0, p ≤ 0.001) than the control group. There was no difference in operating time (79.6 ± 25.7 vs. 84.5 ± 33.2 min, p = 0.087). CONCLUSION: Visual guidance using the telestration device with AR, iSurgeon, improves performance and lowers the complication rates in LCs in novices compared to conventional verbal expert guidance.

What are trainees watching? Assessing the educational quality of online laparoscopic cholecystectomy training videos using the LAP-VEGaS guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most common laparoscopic procedure performed in the US and a key component of general surgery training. Surgical trainees frequently access YouTube for educational walkthroughs of surgical procedures. This study aims to evaluate the educational quality of YouTube video walkthroughs on laparoscopic cholecystectomy by using the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool. METHODS: A YouTube search was conducted using "laparoscopic cholecystectomy." Results were sorted by relevance, and the top 100 videos were gathered. Videos with patient education or concomitant procedures were excluded. Included videos were categorized as Physician (produced by an individual physician), Academic (produced by a university or medical school), Commercial (produced by a surgical company), and Society (produced by a professional surgical society) and were rated by 3 investigators using the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool (0-18). RESULTS: In all, 33 videos met the selection criteria. The average LAP-VEGaS score was 7.96 ± 3.95, and inter-rater reliability was .86. Academic videos demonstrated a significantly higher mean LAP-VEGaS score than Commercial (10.69 ± 3.54 vs 5.25 ± 2.38, P = .033). Most academic videos failed to provide formal case presentations (63%), patient positioning (50%), intraoperative findings (50%), graphic aids (63%), and operative time (75%). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the quality of YouTube video walkthroughs on LC using the LAP-VEGaS tool. Despite demonstrating higher LAP-VEGaS scores than other categories, video walkthroughs provided by academic institutions still lack several essential educational criteria for this procedure, highlighting areas of improvement for educators.

SAGES SAFE CHOLE program changes surgeons practice in France-results of the FCVD implementation of SAFE CHOLE in France.

BACKGROUND: With the Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons supervision, the Safe Cholecystectomy Task Force (SAFE CHOLE) was translated into French by the the Federation of Visceral and Digestive Surgery (FCVD) and adopted to run on its national e-learning platform for surgical continuing medical education (CME). The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the SAFE CHOLE (SF) program on the knowledge and practice of French surgeons performing cholecystectomy and participating in the FCVD lead CME activity. METHODS: To obtain CME certification, each participant must fill out three FCVD validated questionnaires regarding (1) the participants' routine practice for cholecystectomy, (2) the participants' knowledge and practice after successful completion of the program, and (3) the educational value of the SC program. RESULTS: From 2021 to 2022, 481 surgeons completed the program. The overall satisfaction rate for the program was 81%, and 53% of the surgeons were practicing routine cholangiography before the SC program. Eighty percent declared having acquired new knowledge. Fifty-six percent reported a change in their practice of cholecystectomy. Of those, 46% started routinely using the critical view of safety, 12% used a time-out prior transection of vital structures, and 11% adopted routine intraoperative cholangiography. Sixty-seven percent reported performing a sub-total cholecystectomy in case the CVS was unobtainable. If faced with BDI, 45% would transfer to a higher level of care, 33% would seek help from a colleague, and 10% would proceed with a repair. Ninety percent recommended adoption of SC by all general surgeons and 98% reported improvement of patient safety. CONCLUSIONS: Large-scale implementation of the SC program in France is feasible within a broad group of diverse specialty surgeons and appears to have a significant impact on their practice. These data should encourage other surgeons and health systems to engage in this program.

Automated analysis of intraoperative phase in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A comparison of one attending surgeon and their residents.

OBJECTIVE: This study compares the intraoperative phase times in laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by an attending surgeon and supervised residents over 10-years to assess operative times as a marker of performance and any impact of case severity on times. DESIGN: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos were uploaded to Touch Surgery™ Enterprise, a combined software and hardware solution for securely recording, storing, and analysing surgical videos, which provide analytics of intraoperative phase times. Case severity and visualisation of the critical view of safety (CVS) were manually assessed using modified 10-point intraoperative gallbladder scoring system (mG10) and CVS scores, respectively. Attending and residents' times were compared unmatched and matched by mG10. SETTING: Secondary analysis of anonymized laparoscopic cholecystectomy video, recorded as standard of care. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy a single UK hospital. Cases were performed by one attending and their residents. RESULTS: 159 (attending=96, resident=63) laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos and intraoperative phase times were reviewed on Touch Surgery™ Enterprise and analyzed. Attending cases were more challenging (p=0.037). Residents achieved higher CVS scores (p=0.034) and showed longer dissection of hepatocystic triangle (HCT) times (p=0.012) in more challenging cases. Residents' total operative time (p=0.001) and dissection of HCT (p=0.002) times exceeded the attending's in low-severity matched cases (mG10=1). Residents' total operative times (p<0.001), port insertion/gallbladder exposure (p=0.032), and dissection of HCT (p<0.001) exceeded the attending's in matched cases (mG10=2). Residents' total operative (p<0.001), dissection of HCT (p<0.001), and gallbladder dissection (p=0.010) times exceeded the attendings in unmatched cases. CONCLUSIONS: Residents' total operative and dissection of HCT times significantly exceeded the attending's unmatched cases and low-severity matched cases which could suggest training need, however, also reflects an expected assessment of competence, and validates time as a marker of performance.

SurgSmart: an artificial intelligent system for quality control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: The rate of bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) continues to be high due to low critical view of safety (CVS) achievement and the absence of an effective quality control system. The development of an intelligent system enables the automatic quality control of LC surgery and, eventually, the mitigation of bile duct injury. This study aims to develop an intelligent surgical quality control system for LC and using the system to evaluate LC videos and investigate factors associated with CVS achievement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SurgSmart, an intelligent system capable of recognizing surgical phases, disease severity, critical division action, and CVS automatically, was developed using training datasets. SurgSmart was also applied in another multicenter dataset to validate its application and investigate factors associated with CVS achievement. RESULTS: SurgSmart performed well in all models, with the critical division action model achieving the highest overall accuracy (98.49%), followed by the disease severity model (95.45%) and surgical phases model (88.61%). CVSI, CVSII, and CVSIII had an accuracy of 80.64, 97.62, and 78.87%, respectively. CVS was achieved in 4.33% in the system application dataset. In addition, the analysis indicated that surgeons at a higher hospital level had a higher CVS achievement rate. However, there was still considerable variation in CVS achievement among surgeons in the same hospital. CONCLUSIONS: SurgSmart, the surgical quality control system, performed admirably in our study. In addition, the system's initial application demonstrated its broad potential for use in surgical quality control.

Real-Time Augmented Reality Annotation for Surgical Education during Laparoscopic Surgery: Results from a Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial and Future Aspects.

BACKGROUND: We developed an interactive augmented reality tool (HoloPointer) that enables real-time annotation on a laparoscopy monitor for intraoperative guidance. This application operates exclusively via verbal commands and head movements to ensure a sterile workflow. STUDY DESIGN: Purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the integration of this new technology into the operating room. This prospective single-center study included 32 elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies (29 surgical teams, 15 trainees, and 13 trainers). The primary objective and assessment measure was the HoloPointer's influence on surgical performance (subjective assessment, global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills [GOALS] and critical view of safety [CVS]). The secondary objectives and outcome variables were its influence on operation time, quality of assistance (5-point Likert scale), and user-friendliness (system usability scale, 0 to 100 points). RESULTS: Gestural corrections were reduced by 59.4% (4.6 SD 8.1 vs 1.9 SD 4.7, p > 0.05) and verbal corrections by 36.1% (17.8 SD 12.9 vs 11.4 SD 8.1, p > 0.05). Subjective surgical performance could be improved by 84.6% of participants. No statistically significant differences were observed for objective parameters GOALS, CVS, and operation time. In the system usability scale, the application achieved an average score of 72.5 SD 16.3 (good user-friendliness). Of the participants, 69.2% wanted to use the HoloPointer more frequently. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of trainees improved their surgical performance using the HoloPointer in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies, and the rate of classic but potentially misleading corrections was noticeably reduced. The HoloPointer has the potential to improve education in minimally invasive surgery.

Video-based training of situation awareness enhances minimally invasive surgical performance: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Many training curricula were introduced to deal with the challenges that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) presents to the surgeon. Situational awareness (SA) is the ability to process information effectively. It depends on general cognitive abilities and can be divided into three steps: perceiving cues, linking cues to knowledge and understanding their relevance, and predicting possible outcomes. Good SA is crucial to predict and avoid complications and respond efficiently. This study aimed to introduce the concept of SA into laparoscopic training. METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled study conducted at the MIS Training Center of Heidelberg University Hospital. Video sessions showing the steps of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) were used for cognitive training. The intervention group trained SA with interposed questions inserted into the video clips. The identical video clips, without questions, were presented to the control group. Performance was assessed with validated scores such as the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) during LC. RESULTS: 72 participants were enrolled of which 61 were included in the statistical analysis. The SA-group performed LC significantly better (OSATS-Score SA: 67.0 ± 11.5 versus control: 59.1 ± 14.0, p value = 0.034) and with less errors (error score SA: 3.5 ± 1.9 versus control: 4.7 ± 2.0, p value = 0.027). No difference in the time taken to complete the procedure was found. The benefit assessment analysis showed no difference between the groups in terms of perceived learning effect, concentration, or expediency. However, most of the control group indicated retrospectively that they believed they would have benefitted from the intervention. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that video-based SA training for laparoscopic novices has a positive impact on performance and error rate. SA training should thus be included as one aspect besides simulation and real cases in a multimodal curriculum to improve the efficiency of laparoscopic surgical skills training.

Telestration with augmented reality improves surgical performance through gaze guidance.

BACKGROUND: In minimally invasive surgery (MIS), trainees need to learn how to interpret the operative field displayed on the laparoscopic screen. Experts currently guide trainees mainly verbally during laparoscopic procedures. A newly developed telestration system with augmented reality (iSurgeon) allows the instructor to display hand gestures in real-time on the laparoscopic screen in augmented reality to provide visual expert guidance (telestration). This study analysed the effect of telestration guided instructions on gaze behaviour during MIS training. METHODS: In a randomized-controlled crossover study, 40 MIS naive medical students performed 8 laparoscopic tasks with telestration or with verbal instructions only. Pupil Core eye-tracking glasses were used to capture the instructor's and trainees' gazes. Gaze behaviour measures for tasks 1-7 were gaze latency, gaze convergence and collaborative gaze convergence. Performance measures included the number of errors in tasks 1-7 and trainee's ratings in structured and standardized performance scores in task 8 (ex vivo porcine laparoscopic cholecystectomy). RESULTS: There was a significant improvement 1-7 on gaze latency [F(1,39) = 762.5, p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.95], gaze convergence [F(1,39) = 482.8, p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.93] and collaborative gaze convergence [F(1,39) = 408.4, p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.91] upon instruction with iSurgeon. The number of errors was significantly lower in tasks 1-7 (0.18 ± 0.56 vs. 1.94 ± 1.80, p < 0.01) and the score ratings for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were significantly higher with telestration (global OSATS: 29 ± 2.5 vs. 25 ± 5.5, p < 0.01; task-specific OSATS: 60 ± 3 vs. 50 ± 6, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Telestration with augmented reality successfully improved surgical performance. The trainee's gaze behaviour was improved by reducing the time from instruction to fixation on targets and leading to a higher convergence of the instructor's and the trainee's gazes. Also, the convergence of trainee's gaze and target areas increased with telestration. This confirms augmented reality-based telestration works by means of gaze guidance in MIS and could be used to improve training outcomes.

Resident performance in simulation module is associated with operating room performance for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Simulation is an important tool in surgical training. However, the transferability of skills obtained in the simulation setting to the operating room (OR) is uncertain. This study explores the association between resident simulation performance and OR performance in a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) simulation module. METHODS: A simulation module focused on LC utilizing a virtual reality simulator was completed by general surgery residents. Simulation performance was evaluated using the validated Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) and Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS), as well as a LC-specific simulation assessment form (LC-SIM). Resident subsequent OR performances of LC were measured by the Surgical Training and Assessment Tool (STAT), an online mobile-based evaluation completed by attending surgeons. RESULTS: Twenty-one residents who completed the simulation module and also with STAT data on LC from 2016 to 2020 were included. Higher scores on incision/port placement on LC-SIM is associated with better tissue handling (coefficient 0.20, p = 0.048) and better time & economy of motion on STAT (coefficient 0.22, p = 0.037). However, higher scores on time and motion on OSATS are associated with worse tissue handling (- 0.28, p = 0.046), worse time & economy of motion (- 0.37, p = 0.009), and worse overall grade (- 0.21, p = 0.044). Higher scores on overall performance on OSATS is associated with worse time & economy of motion (- 0.80, p = 0.008). Higher scores on depth perception on GOALS are associated with worse tissue handling (- 0.28, p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: We found significant positive and negative associations between resident simulation performance and OR performance, particularly in tissue handling and economy of motion. This could suggest that simulation performance does not reliably predict OR performance. However, this could highlight the concept of excessive caution in the real OR environment and longer operative time which could be interpreted as worse time and economy of motion by the attending surgeons.

Telestration with augmented reality for visual presentation of intraoperative target structures in minimally invasive surgery: a randomized controlled study.

AIMS: In minimally invasive surgery (MIS), intraoperative guidance has been limited to verbal communication without direct visual guidance. Communication issues and mistaken instructions in training procedures can hinder correct identification of anatomical structures on the MIS screen. The iSurgeon system was developed to provide visual guidance in the operating room by telestration with augmented reality (AR). METHODS: Laparoscopic novices (n = 60) were randomized in two groups in a cross-over design: group 1 trained only with verbal guidance first and then with additional telestration with AR on the operative screen and vice versa for group 2. Training consisted of laparoscopic basic training and subsequently a specifically designed training course, including a porcine laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Outcome included time needed for training, performance with Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS), and Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) score for LC, complications, and subjective workload (NASA-TLX questionnaire). RESULTS: Telestration with AR led to significantly faster total training time (1163 ± 275 vs. 1658 ± 375 s, p < 0.001) and reduced error rates. LC on a porcine liver was performed significantly better (GOALS 21 ± 5 vs. 18 ± 4, p < 0.007 and OSATS 67 ± 11 vs. 61 ± 8, p < 0.015) and with less complications (13.3% vs. 40%, p < 0.020) with AR. Subjective workload and stress were significantly reduced during training with AR (33.6 ± 12.0 vs. 30.6 ± 12.9, p < 0.022). CONCLUSION: Telestration with AR improves training success and safety in MIS. The next step will be the clinical application of telestration with AR and the development of a mobile version for remote guidance.

Subjective vs. objective assessment of simulation performance on laparoscopic cholecystectomy: are we evaluating the right things?

BACKGROUND: Simulation using virtual reality (VR) simulators is an important tool in surgical training. VR laparoscopic simulators can provide immediate objective performance assessment without observer evaluation. This study aims to explore the correlation between subjective observer evaluation and VR laparoscopic simulator performance metrics in a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) simulation module. METHODS: A LC simulation module using a VR laparoscopic simulator was completed by PGY2-3 general surgery residents at a single institution. Simulation performance was recorded and evaluated by a trained evaluator using the validated Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) form, the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) form, and a LC-specific simulation assessment form (LC-SIM). Objective performance metrics were also obtained from the simulator system. Performance before the curriculum (pre-test) and after the curriculum (post-test) were compared. RESULTS: Fourteen residents were included in the study. There were significant improvements from pre-test to post-test on each component of GOALS, OSATS, and LC-SIM scores (all p values < 0.05). In terms of objective simulator metrics, significant improvements were noted in time to extract gallbladder (481 ± 221 vs 909 ± 366 min, p = 0.019), total number of movements (475 ± 264 vs 839 ± 324 min, p = 0.012), and total path length (955 ± 475 vs 1775 ± 632 cm, p = 0.012) from pre-test to post-test. While number of movements and total path lengths of both hands decreased, speed of right instrument also decreased from 4.1 + 2.7 to 3.0 ± 0.7 cm/sec (p = 0.007). Average speed of left instrument was associated with respect for tissue (r = 0.60, p < 0.05) and depth perception (r = 0.68, p < 0.05) on post-test evaluations. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated significant improvement in technical skills based on subjective evaluator assessment as well as objective simulator metrics after simulation. The few correlations identified between the subjective evaluator and the objective simulator assessments suggest the two evaluation modalities were measuring different aspects of the technical skills and should both be considered in the evaluation process.

Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as an Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA) for General Surgical Trainees in Australia.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the operation time and surgical outcomes of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by surgical trainees at different levels of training at Eastern health and hence, to establish the efficacy and safety of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy as an Entrustable Professional Activity for surgical trainees in general surgery. OBJECTIVE: Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed at our institution between January 2018 and January 2019 were included. Analyses were divided among three groups - consultants (C), fellows (F) and registrars (R). Standard technique with critical view of safety was used. RESULTS: A total of 592 patients was included, with a mean age of 54 ± 63 years old. The average operation time was 84 ± 51 minutes. Surgical education and training (SET) 2 trainees took significantly longer when compared to their SET3 and above counterparts as a primary operator (SET2: 131 ± 32 min, Reference; SET3: 78 ± 21 min, p = 0.003; SET4: 80 ± 33 min, p = 0.004; SET5: 77 ± 28 min, p = 0.003; F: 93 ± 77 min, p = 0.036; C: 85 ± 59 min; p = 0.007). Consultant primary operators took an average of 15 minutes longer to complete the operation when assisted by a SET trainee compared to the non-SET registrars (p = 0.03). The overall complication rate was 3.2% and was not significantly different among all three groups (p = 0.17). No death was recorded during the study period. The readmission and return to theatre rates were 7.8% and 0.8% respectively and were not significantly different among the groups (p-values = 0.61 and 0.69). All conversion to open were performed by the consultant primary operator. CONCLUSIONS: Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed by surgical trainees at all SET levels when under appropriate supervision, although junior surgical trainees that is SET 2 took longer to complete the procedure. This operation seems to have a steep, but relatively short, learning curve and it may be broken down into various components. These components, with the addition of time, may be suitable as an Entrustable Professional Activity tool for assessing the competency of early SET trainees.

Long-term retention after structured curriculum on attainment of critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Obtaining a clear Critical View of Safety helps prevent bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which can be improved with a structured Safe Critical View of Safety curriculum. We aimed to determine whether the improvement in obtaining Critical View of Safety postcurriculum is retained long-term. METHODS: A safe Critical View of Safety curriculum was previously implemented for all surgeons who perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a regional health system. Recordings of laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases were collected 1 year after completion of the curriculum, deidentified and randomly ordered, and then graded by 2 blinded expert surgeons using a 6-point Critical View of Safety assessment tool. RESULTS: A total of 12 surgeons with average experience of 17.9 ± 6.3 years in practice participated in the study. The majority (83%) had performed >700 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, and 4 surgeons (33%) reported 2 or more bile duct injuries in their career. Controlling for gallbladder pathology, Critical View of Safety scores improved from 1.7 ± 0.4 to 4.0 ± 0.4 (P < .001) immediately after completion of the curriculum. However, there was a small decrease in Critical View of Safety score after 1 year (3.2 ± 0.3 from 4.0 ± 0.4, P = .055), while still significantly higher compared to precurriculum (3.2 ± 0.3 vs 1.7 ± 0.4, P < .001). Acute care surgeons had lower Critical View of Safety retention scores compared to general surgeons (1.8 ± 0.5 vs 3.3 ± 0.4, P = .01) and minimally invasive surgeons (1.8 ± 0.5 vs 3.8 ± 0.5, P < .01). CONCLUSION: A structured curriculum helped improve practicing surgeons' attainment of obtaining the Critical View of Safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, this improvement decreased after 1 year, suggesting some decay in knowledge retention over time. Therefore, continued educational interventions on Critical View of Safety and safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be needed to enhance long-term retention.

Open Cholecystectomy for the New Learner-Obstacles and Challenges.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy has become the standard of care in most general surgery procedures. This has led to a decrease in the number of open surgical procedures for surgical training, particularly as senior surgeons retire. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of retiring senior surgeons on our residents' operative experience. METHODS: Cholecystectomies performed between Jan 2010 and Dec 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Surgeons training residents were divided into two groups based on their training experience. Group 1 were trained in the prelaparoscopic era, and group 2 were trained during the age of laparoscopy. We then evaluated the impact of retirement on the number of open cholecystectomies performed. RESULTS: There were 4555 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed at our institution over a 7-year period. Overall conversion rate was 1.5% (66/4555). Conversion rates were higher in group 1 as compared to group 2. The analysis of the number of open cases performed by each graduating resident showed reduction in the number of open cholecystectomies performed over time. CONCLUSION: The decline in the number of open cholecystectomies creates a challenge for the training of general surgery residents. To compensate, we have employed simulation curriculum with the use of cadaveric surgical anatomy courses. Additionally, with transplant curriculum, open cholecystectomy experience has increased with liver transplant exposure. Continued laparoscopic experience has also shown that advanced laparoscopic techniques such as top down dissection laparoscopically have decreased the need for conversion to open and are skills that graduating residents possess.

Helping the Surgeon Recover: Peer-to-Peer Coaching after Bile Duct Injury.

BACKGROUND: Bile duct injury sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and can be a devastating complication for a general surgeon. We introduce a novel, individualized surgical coaching program for surgeons who recently injured a bile duct in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We aim to explore the perception of coaching among these surgeons and to assess surgeons' experiences in the coaching program. STUDY DESIGN: Six general surgeons who injured a bile duct at an emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy participated in a 1-on-1 coaching session with a hepatopancreatobiliary surgeon. The session focused on debriefing the index case with video feedback, and discussion of strategies for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The pilot program ran from March to November 2020. Exit interviews were then conducted. Themes covering perception of surgical training, perception of complications, and experience in the coaching program were explored. RESULTS: Surgeons were generally accepting of the coaching program, especially when the goals aligned with their self-identified areas of development. One-on-1 sessions with a local expert in the area, and the use of video feedback created a unique and interactive coaching opportunity. Peer coaching was identified as a valuable resource in helping surgeons regain confidence and maintain well-being after a bile duct injury. Maintaining a collegial, nonjudgmental relationship is critical in establishing positive coaching experiences. CONCLUSIONS: An individualized surgical coaching program creates a unique opportunity for professional development and may help promote safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy.