Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 108
Filtrar
1.
Can Rev Sociol ; 61(2): 110-130, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38535618

RESUMEN

This paper provides a longitudinal social network and content analysis of Canadian think tanks affiliated with the Atlas network, analyzing their efforts to obstruct climate action over the last two decades. Network analysis reveals extensive and deepening board interlocks and joint memberships between these think tanks and the fossil fuel industry, other policy-planning organizations within and beyond Canada, and academic institutions. Consistent with and rooted in network ties, Atlas members produce a large and growing volume of climate-related content, including content that denies the reality and impacts of climate change, promotes and defends the fossil fuel sector, and opposes climate policy and action. Atlas affiliates are argued to be at the core of a reactionary segment of Canada's elite policy-planning network opposed to virtually all forms of climate action, while the frames and campaigns they deploy are seen as a force obstructing progress on climate change.


Cet article propose une analyse longitudinale des réseaux sociaux et du contenu des groupes de réflexion canadiens affiliés au réseau Atlas, en analysant leurs efforts d'obstruction à l'action climatique au cours des deux dernières décennies. L'analyse des réseaux révèle des liens étendus et de plus en plus profonds entre les conseils d'administration et les membres conjoints de ces groupes de réflexion et l'industrie des combustibles fossiles, d'autres organisations de planification politique au Canada et à l'étranger, ainsi que des institutions universitaires. En accord avec les liens du réseau et enracinés dans ceux­ci, les membres de l'Atlas produisent un volume important et croissant de contenus liés au climat, y compris des contenus qui nient la réalité et les impacts du changement climatique, promeuvent et défendent le secteur des combustibles fossiles et s'opposent aux politiques et actions climatiques. Les affiliés d'Atlas sont considérés comme étant au cœur d'un segment réactionnaire du réseau d'élite de planification politique du Canada opposé à pratiquement toutes les formes d'action climatique, tandis que les cadres et les campagnes qu'ils déploient sont perçus comme une force qui entrave les progrès en matière de changement climatique.


Asunto(s)
Cambio Climático , Canadá , Cambio Climático/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Combustibles Fósiles/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Am J Hum Biol ; 33(4): e23579, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33629785

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The dual crises of climate change and chronic, or non-communicable, disease (NCD) have emerged worldwide as the global economy has industrialized over the past two centuries. AIMS: In this synthesis I examine humans' dependence on external (non-metabolic) energy expenditure (e.g., fire, fossil fuels) as a common, root cause in these modern crises. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using fossil, archeological, and historical evidence I show that the human lineage has been dependent on external energy sources since the control of fire in the Paleolithic. This reliance has grown with the development of agriculture, the use of wind- and water-power, and the most recently with industrialization and the transition to fossil fuels. To place industrialization in context I develop a Rule of 50, whereby individuals in industrialized economies consume roughly 50-times more external energy and manufacture roughly 50-times more material than do hunter-gatherers. RESULTS: Industrialization and mechanization, powered by fossil fuels, have promoted centralization and processing in food production, reduced physical activity, and increased air pollution (including greenhouse gas emissions). These developments have led in turn to NCD and climate change. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Climate change and NCD are connected both to one another and to our species' deep evolutionary dependence on external energy. Transitioning to carbon-free energy is essential to reduce the existential risks of climate change, but will likely have only modest effects on NCD. With the impending exhaustion of oil, coal, and natural gas reserves, developing replacements for fossil fuels is also critical to maintaining our species' external energy portfolio.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Crónica/prevención & control , Cambio Climático , Combustibles Fósiles/estadística & datos numéricos , Calor/efectos adversos , Desarrollo Industrial/tendencias , Humanos
3.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 118(7)2021 02 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33558224

RESUMEN

Socioeconomic development in low- and middle-income countries has been accompanied by increased emissions of air pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides [NOx: nitrogen dioxide (NO2) + nitric oxide (NO)], which affect human health. In sub-Saharan Africa, fossil fuel combustion has nearly doubled since 2000. At the same time, landscape biomass burning-another important NOx source-has declined in north equatorial Africa, attributed to changes in climate and anthropogenic fire management. Here, we use satellite observations of tropospheric NO2 vertical column densities (VCDs) and burned area to identify NO2 trends and drivers over Africa. Across the northern ecosystems where biomass burning occurs-home to hundreds of millions of people-mean annual tropospheric NO2 VCDs decreased by 4.5% from 2005 through 2017 during the dry season of November through February. Reductions in burned area explained the majority of variation in NO2 VCDs, though changes in fossil fuel emissions also explained some variation. Over Africa's biomass burning regions, raising mean GDP density (USD⋅km-2) above its lowest levels is associated with lower NO2 VCDs during the dry season, suggesting that economic development mitigates net NO2 emissions during these highly polluted months. In contrast to the traditional notion that socioeconomic development increases air pollutant concentrations in low- and middle-income nations, our results suggest that countries in Africa's northern biomass-burning region are following a different pathway during the fire season, resulting in potential air quality benefits. However, these benefits may be lost with increasing fossil fuel use and are absent during the rainy season.


Asunto(s)
Atmósfera/química , Combustibles Fósiles/estadística & datos numéricos , Óxido Nítrico/análisis , África Central , Contaminación del Aire/estadística & datos numéricos , Biomasa , Combustibles Fósiles/efectos adversos , Óxido Nítrico/química
4.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 18688, 2020 10 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33122844

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic caused drastic reductions in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, but due to its large atmospheric reservoir and long lifetime, no detectable signal has been observed in the atmospheric CO2 growth rate. Using the variabilities in CO2 (ΔCO2) and methane (ΔCH4) observed at Hateruma Island, Japan during 1997-2020, we show a traceable CO2 emission reduction in China during February-March 2020. The monitoring station at Hateruma Island observes the outflow of Chinese emissions during winter and spring. A systematic increase in the ΔCO2/ΔCH4 ratio, governed by synoptic wind variability, well corroborated the increase in China's fossil-fuel CO2 (FFCO2) emissions during 1997-2019. However, the ΔCO2/ΔCH4 ratios showed significant decreases of 29 ± 11 and 16 ± 11 mol mol-1 in February and March 2020, respectively, relative to the 2011-2019 average of 131 ± 11 mol mol-1. By projecting these observed ΔCO2/ΔCH4 ratios on transport model simulations, we estimated reductions of 32 ± 12% and 19 ± 15% in the FFCO2 emissions in China for February and March 2020, respectively, compared to the expected emissions. Our data are consistent with the abrupt decrease in the economic activity in February, a slight recovery in March, and return to normal in April, which was calculated based on the COVID-19 lockdowns and mobility restriction datasets.


Asunto(s)
Dióxido de Carbono/análisis , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Combustibles Fósiles/estadística & datos numéricos , Efecto Invernadero/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Atmósfera/química , COVID-19 , China , Infecciones por Coronavirus/economía , Humanos , Japón , Metano/análisis , Pandemias/economía , Neumonía Viral/economía
5.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31671848

RESUMEN

Most authors apply the Granger causality-VECM (vector error correction model), and Toda-Yamamoto procedures to investigate the relationships among fossil fuel consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth, though they ignore the group joint effects and nonlinear behaviour among the variables. In order to circumvent the limitations and bridge the gap in the literature, this paper combines cointegration and linear and nonlinear Granger causality in multivariate settings to investigate the long-run equilibrium, short-run impact, and dynamic causality relationships among economic growth, CO2 emissions, and fossil fuel consumption in China from 1965-2016. Using the combination of the newly developed econometric techniques, we obtain many novel empirical findings that are useful for policy makers. For example, cointegration and causality analysis imply that increasing CO2 emissions not only leads to immediate economic growth, but also future economic growth, both linearly and nonlinearly. In addition, the findings from cointegration and causality analysis in multivariate settings do not support the argument that reducing CO2 emissions and/or fossil fuel consumption does not lead to a slowdown in economic growth in China. The novel empirical findings are useful for policy makers in relation to fossil fuel consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth. Using the novel findings, governments can make better decisions regarding energy conservation and emission reductions policies without undermining the pace of economic growth in the long run.


Asunto(s)
Dióxido de Carbono/análisis , Desarrollo Económico/estadística & datos numéricos , Desarrollo Económico/tendencias , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Combustibles Fósiles/estadística & datos numéricos , Emisiones de Vehículos , China , Predicción , Modelos Estadísticos
6.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31771259

RESUMEN

Public health issues are a global focus, but recent research on the links between fossil energy consumption, pollutant emissions, and public health in different regions have presented inconsistent conclusions. In order to quantify the effect of fossil energy use and pollutant emissions on public health from the global perspective, this paper investigates 33 countries with high GDP and fossil energy consumption from 1995 to 2015 using a fixed effect model. Further, this paper utilizes heterogeneity analysis to characterize the disparity of countries with different features. Empirical results indicate that total fossil energy consumption is beneficial to the life expectancy of the population (LEP), but pollutant emissions (PM10 concentration and greenhouse gas scale) have a negative effect on LEP. Moreover, the heterogeneity test indicates that pollutant emissions lowers LEP in net energy importers more than in net energy exporters, and the effect of such emissions in low- and middle-income countries on public health is more harmful than that in high-income countries. These findings suggest that it is a greater priority for governments to strengthen the control of pollutant emissions through enhancing the efficiency of energy consumption, rather than by reducing its scale of use in low- and middle-income, and net energy importing countries. Additionally, governments also need to focus on the volatility of pollutant emissions in high-income countries with necessary control measures.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Combustibles Fósiles/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Pública/estadística & datos numéricos
8.
PLoS One ; 13(11): e0206822, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30458001

RESUMEN

Nearly half the world's population burns solid fuel for cooking, heating, and lighting. The incomplete combustion of these fuels is associated with detrimental health and environmental effects. The design and distribution of improved cookstoves that increase combustion efficiency and reduce indoor air pollution are a global priority. However, promoting exclusive and sustainable use of the improved stoves has proved challenging. In 2012, we conducted a survey in a community in rural Senegal to describe stove ownership and preferences for different stove technologies. This report aims to describe local stove and fuel use, to identify household preferences related to stove features and function, and to elicit the community perceptions of cleaner-burning stove alternatives with a focus on liquid propane gas. Similar to many resource-limited settings, biomass fuel use was ubiquitous and multiple stoves were used, even when cleaner burning alternatives were available; less than 1% of households that owned a liquid propane stove used it as the primary cooking device. Despite nearly universal use of the traditional open fire (92% of households), women did not prefer this stove when presented with other options. Propane gas, solar, and improved cookstoves were all viewed as more desirable when compared to the traditional open fire, however first-hand experience and knowledge of these stoves was limited. The stove features of greatest value were, in order: large cooking capacity, minimal smoke production, and rapid heating. Despite the low desirability and smoke emisions from the traditional open fire, its pervasive use, even in the presence of alternative stove options, may be related to its ability to satisfy the practical needs of the surveyed cooks, namely large cooking capacity and rapid, intense heat generation. Our data suggest women in this community want alternative stove options that reduce smoke exposure, however currently available stoves, including liquid propane gas, do not address all of the cooks' preferences.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior/prevención & control , Comportamiento del Consumidor/estadística & datos numéricos , Culinaria/instrumentación , Artículos Domésticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Contaminación del Aire Interior/efectos adversos , Culinaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Composición Familiar , Femenino , Incendios/estadística & datos numéricos , Combustibles Fósiles/efectos adversos , Combustibles Fósiles/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Senegal , Humo/efectos adversos , Humo/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo
9.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 25(23): 23170-23194, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29862476

RESUMEN

A large number of studies have examined the linkage between income inequality and environmental quality at the individual country levels. This study attempts to examine the linkage between the two factors for the individual BRICS economies from a comparative perspective, which is scarce in the literature. It examines the selected countries (Brazil, India, China and South Africa) by endogenising the patterns of primary energy consumption (coal use and petroleum use), total primary energy consumption, economic growth, and urbanisation as key determining factors in CO2 emission function. The long-run results based on ARDL bounds testing revealed that income inequality leads to increase in CO2 emissions for Brazil, India and China, while the same factor leads to reduction in CO2 emissions for South Africa. However, it observes that while coal use increases CO2 emissions for India, China and South Africa, it has no effect for Brazil. In contrast, the use of petroleum products contributes to CO2 emissions in Brazil, while the use of the same surprisingly results in reduction of carbon emissions in South Africa, India and China. The findings suggest that given the significance of income inequality in environmental pollution, the policy makers in these emerging economies have to take into consideration the role of income inequality, while designing the energy policy to achieve environmental sustainability.


Asunto(s)
Dióxido de Carbono , Contaminación Ambiental , Combustibles Fósiles/estadística & datos numéricos , Renta , Brasil , China , Cambio Climático , Carbón Mineral , Desarrollo Económico , Política Ambiental , India , Modelos Teóricos , Centrales Eléctricas , Política Pública , Factores Socioeconómicos , Sudáfrica , Urbanización
10.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 25(22): 21701-21712, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29790046

RESUMEN

This study explores the impact of fossil fuels consumption, solid fuels consumption for cooking purposes, economic growth, and carbon emissions on human health, with a key emphasis on the occurrence of tuberculosis and the high mortality rate in Sub-Saharan Africa. For its practical insights, the study develops a system Generalized Method of Moment (GMM) for a panel of 34 middle- and lower-middle-income countries from 1995 to 2015. The study adopts a flexible methodology to tackle endogeneity in the variables. The robust results report that the use of solid fuels (charcoal, peat, wood, wood pellets, crop residues) for cooking purposes and the consumption of fossil fuels (oil, coal, gas) are significantly increasing the occurrence of tuberculosis. In addition, the results highlight that the consumption of both solid fuels and fossil fuels has adverse affects on life expectancy by increasing the mortality rate in Sub-Saharan African countries. Results report that renewable energy sources like sun, wind, and water (all with potential to prevent households from direct exposure to particulate matters and harmful gases) as well as a rise in economic growth serve as helping factors to control the occurrence of tuberculosis and to decrease the mortality rate. Moreover, the use of renewable energy sources is serving to lessen emissions of carbon dioxide, nitrogen dioxides, and particulate matters, which can ultimately decrease the mortality rate and extend the life expectancy in Sub-Saharan Africa.


Asunto(s)
Culinaria/métodos , Mortalidad , África del Sur del Sahara/epidemiología , Dióxido de Carbono/análisis , Carbón Mineral , Desarrollo Económico/estadística & datos numéricos , Combustibles Fósiles/estadística & datos numéricos , Hábitos , Humanos , Renta , Esperanza de Vida/tendencias , Energía Renovable , Tuberculosis/epidemiología , Urbanización/tendencias , Madera/química
12.
PLoS One ; 13(3): e0192364, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29513672

RESUMEN

Ancient civilisations depended heavily on natural fuel resources for a wide array of activities, and this had an impact on such resources that can be traced in the archaeological record. At its urban apex, the populations of the Indus Civilisation (2600-1900 BC) produced a wide range of objects and crafts, several of which involved highly specialised pyrotechnology. In the wake of increasing aridity and a period of weakened monsoon rainfall that affected South Asia from 2100 BC, these activities potentially put pressure on the natural resource base that may have had to be counterbalanced by differentiation in fuel use. The combined analysis of archaeobotanical and geoarchaeological remains from four Indus urban phase archaeological sites, has enable an assessment of the mechanisms through which people exploited wood, and diversified their fuel resources to adapt to the arid to semi-arid environments in which they lived. The combined use of local wood species with alternative fuels, such as dung and crop-processing leftovers, are evidence for resilient socio-ecological practices during the 700 years of Indus urbanism and perhaps beyond.


Asunto(s)
Civilización , Combustibles Fósiles/estadística & datos numéricos , Urbanización , Madera , Arqueología/métodos , Asia , Carbón Orgánico/análisis , Geografía , Humanos , Lluvia , Ríos , Estaciones del Año , Hollín/análisis , Factores de Tiempo
14.
Nature ; 554(7691): 229-233, 2018 02 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29420477

RESUMEN

Hopes are high that removing fossil fuel subsidies could help to mitigate climate change by discouraging inefficient energy consumption and levelling the playing field for renewable energy. In September 2016, the G20 countries re-affirmed their 2009 commitment (at the G20 Leaders' Summit) to phase out fossil fuel subsidies and many national governments are using today's low oil prices as an opportunity to do so. In practical terms, this means abandoning policies that decrease the price of fossil fuels and electricity generated from fossil fuels to below normal market prices. However, whether the removal of subsidies, even if implemented worldwide, would have a large impact on climate change mitigation has not been systematically explored. Here we show that removing fossil fuel subsidies would have an unexpectedly small impact on global energy demand and carbon dioxide emissions and would not increase renewable energy use by 2030. Subsidy removal would reduce the carbon price necessary to stabilize greenhouse gas concentration at 550 parts per million by only 2-12 per cent under low oil prices. Removing subsidies in most regions would deliver smaller emission reductions than the Paris Agreement (2015) climate pledges and in some regions global subsidy removal may actually lead to an increase in emissions, owing to either coal replacing subsidized oil and natural gas or natural-gas use shifting from subsidizing, energy-exporting regions to non-subsidizing, importing regions. Our results show that subsidy removal would result in the largest CO2 emission reductions in high-income oil- and gas-exporting regions, where the reductions would exceed the climate pledges of these regions and where subsidy removal would affect fewer people living below the poverty line than in lower-income regions.


Asunto(s)
Comercio/economía , Comercio/estadística & datos numéricos , Financiación Gubernamental/economía , Financiación Gubernamental/tendencias , Combustibles Fósiles/economía , Combustibles Fósiles/estadística & datos numéricos , Calentamiento Global/prevención & control , Dióxido de Carbono/análisis , Electricidad , Financiación Gubernamental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Calentamiento Global/legislación & jurisprudencia , Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , Cooperación Internacional , Pobreza/economía , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos
17.
Integr Environ Assess Manag ; 12(3): 429-36, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26551582

RESUMEN

Energy use is a common impact category in life cycle assessment (LCA). Many different energy use indicators are used in LCA studies, accounting for energy use in different ways. Often, however, the choice behind which energy use indicator is applied is poorly described and motivated. To contribute to a more purposeful selection of energy use indicators and to ensure consistent and transparent reporting of energy use in LCA, a general framework for energy use indicator construction and reporting in LCA studies will be presented in this article. The framework differentiates between 1) renewable and nonrenewable energies, 2) primary and secondary energies, and 3) energy intended for energy purposes versus energy intended for material purposes. This framework is described both graphically and mathematically. Furthermore, the framework is illustrated through application to a number of energy use indicators that are frequently used in LCA studies: cumulative energy demand (CED), nonrenewable cumulative energy demand (NRCED), fossil energy use (FEU), primary fossil energy use (PFEU), and secondary energy use (SEU). To illustrate how the application of different energy use indicators may lead to different results, cradle-to-gate energy use of the bionanomaterial cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) is assessed using 5 different indicators and showing a factor of 3 differences between the highest and lowest results. The relevance of different energy use indicators to different actors and contexts will be discussed, and further developments of the framework are then suggested. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2016;12:429-436. © 2015 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo del Ambiente/normas , Conservación de los Recursos Energéticos/métodos , Conservación de los Recursos Energéticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Combustibles Fósiles/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración de Residuos/estadística & datos numéricos
20.
Nature ; 524(7565): 335-8, 2015 Aug 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26289204

RESUMEN

Nearly three-quarters of the growth in global carbon emissions from the burning of fossil fuels and cement production between 2010 and 2012 occurred in China. Yet estimates of Chinese emissions remain subject to large uncertainty; inventories of China's total fossil fuel carbon emissions in 2008 differ by 0.3 gigatonnes of carbon, or 15 per cent. The primary sources of this uncertainty are conflicting estimates of energy consumption and emission factors, the latter being uncertain because of very few actual measurements representative of the mix of Chinese fuels. Here we re-evaluate China's carbon emissions using updated and harmonized energy consumption and clinker production data and two new and comprehensive sets of measured emission factors for Chinese coal. We find that total energy consumption in China was 10 per cent higher in 2000-2012 than the value reported by China's national statistics, that emission factors for Chinese coal are on average 40 per cent lower than the default values recommended by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and that emissions from China's cement production are 45 per cent less than recent estimates. Altogether, our revised estimate of China's CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion and cement production is 2.49 gigatonnes of carbon (2 standard deviations = ±7.3 per cent) in 2013, which is 14 per cent lower than the emissions reported by other prominent inventories. Over the full period 2000 to 2013, our revised estimates are 2.9 gigatonnes of carbon less than previous estimates of China's cumulative carbon emissions. Our findings suggest that overestimation of China's emissions in 2000-2013 may be larger than China's estimated total forest sink in 1990-2007 (2.66 gigatonnes of carbon) or China's land carbon sink in 2000-2009 (2.6 gigatonnes of carbon).


Asunto(s)
Carbono/análisis , Materiales de Construcción/provisión & distribución , Combustibles Fósiles/estadística & datos numéricos , Dióxido de Carbono/análisis , Secuestro de Carbono , China , Cambio Climático , Carbón Mineral/estadística & datos numéricos , Árboles/metabolismo , Incertidumbre
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...