Risk factors analysis and multidisciplinary team first-aid simulation training for umbilical cord prolapse can improve neonatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we sought to identify risk factors for umbilical cord prolapse (UCP) and adapt the multidisciplinary team (MDT) first-aid simulation training for UCP patients. We evaluated the usefulness of the MDT first-aid simulation by comparing delivery outcomes for UCP patients before and after its implementation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on 149 UCP cases (48 overt and 101 occult) and 298 control deliveries that occurred at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 1998 to December 2022. Patient data were compared between the groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for means comparison, and the chi-square test was used for categorical data. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors significantly associated with UCP. RESULTS: Overt UCP was strongly associated with all adverse delivery outcomes. Both univariate and multivariate analyses identified multiparity, breech presentation, polyhydramnios, and low birth weight as independent risk factors for overt UCP (all odds ratios [OR] > 1; all p < 0.05). Preterm labor and abnormal placental cord insertion were identified as independent risk factors for occult UCP (all OR > 1; all p < 0.05). After 2014, when obstetrical staff received MDT first-aid simulation training, patients with overt UCP experienced shorter decision-to-delivery intervals due to more timely cesarean sections. They also had higher Apgar scores at 1, 5, and 10 min, and lower admission rates to the neonatal intensive care unit compared to patients before 2014 (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: MDT first-aid simulation training for overt UCP can improve neonatal outcomes. However, medical simulation training efforts should initially focus on the early identification of risk factors for both overt and occult UCP.

Overt umbilical cord prolapse (UCP) is an obstetric emergency that can lead to adverse delivery outcomes. Early identification of risk factors for both overt and occult UCP is beneficial for facilitating early interventions. Multidisciplinary team first-aid simulation training specifically for overt UCP has been shown to effectively improve neonatal outcomes.

Is water delivery a good idea to prevent obstetric anal sphincter injuries in low risk primiparae? An exploratory study in a Swiss public teaching hospital.

OBJECTIVE: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries are feared perineal injuries that are associated with increased pelvic floor disorders. The knowledge of influencing factors as the mode of delivery is therefore important. The aim of this study is to compare the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in primiparae after water and bed deliveries. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study 3907 primiparae gave birth in water or on a bed in a Swiss teaching hospital. The diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries was confirmed by a consultant of obstetrics and gynecology and treated by them. The rates of these injuries after water and bed births were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed to detect possible associative factors, such as birth weight, episiotomy, use of oxytocin in first and second stage of labor. RESULTS: 1844 (47.2 %) of the primiparae had a water delivery and 2063 (52.8 %) a bed delivery. 193 (4.94 %) were diagnosed with obstetric anal sphincter injuries, of which 68 (3.7 %) had a water delivery and 125 (6.1 %) a bed delivery, p < 0.001. Subgroup analysis revealed that, in the first and second stage of labor, the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries with oxytocin was significantly lower in water than in bed deliveries; p = 0.025, p < 0.017, respectively. The rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in the birth weight or episiotomy subgroups did not reach significance. CONCLUSIONS: In a teaching hospital setting with standardized labor management, primiparae with a water delivery have the lowest risk for obstetric anal sphincter injuries.

[Evolution of the rate of episiotomies and obstetric anal sphincter injuries since the last recommendations of 2018]. / Évolution du taux d'épisiotomies et des lésions obstétricales du sphincter de l'anus depuis les recommandations de 2018.

OBJECTIVES: There is a progressive reduction in the rate of episiotomies since the recommendations of the French college of gynaecologists. Our objective was to study the evolution of the rate of episiotomies and Obstetric Anus Sphincter Injury (OASI) since the restriction of episiotomies in our department. METHODS: Observational monocentric retrospective study performed at the Rouen University Hospital. The inclusion criteria were monofetal pregnancies, delivery at a term greater than or equal to 37 weeks of amenorrhea of a living, viable child and by cephalic presentation. We compared two periods corresponding to before and after the 2018 recommendations. We used logistic regression modelling to identify factors associated with the risk of episiotomies and of obstetrical anal injuries, overall and in case of instrumental delivery. RESULTS: We included 3329 patients for the 1st period and 3492 for the 2nd period, and the rate of instrumental deliveries were respectively of 16.4% (n=547) and 17.9% (n=626). Multivariate analysis showed a significant decrease in the rate of episiotomies in the 2nd period (OR 0.14, CI 95% [0.12; 0.16], P<0.0001). Main factors associated with the risk of OASI were primiparity (OR 6.21, CI 95% [3.19; 12.11]) and the use of forceps (OR 4.23, CI 95% [2.17; 8.27]) overall; and instrumental delivery using forceps (OR 3.25, CI 95% [1.69; 6.22]) and delivery during the 2nd period (OR 1.98, CI 95% [1.01; 3.88]) in case of instrumental delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that the voluntary reduction in the episiotomy rate does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of OASI, overall and in case of instrumental delivery. However, we show an increase in the rate of OASI in case of instrumental delivery since the latest recommendations.

The prevention of perineal trauma during vaginal birth.

Perineal trauma after vaginal birth is common, with approximately 9 of 10 women being affected. Second-degree perineal tears are twice as likely to occur in primiparous births, with a incidence of 40%. The incidence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury is approximately 3%, with a significantly higher rate in primiparous than in multiparous women (6% vs 2%). Obstetrical anal sphincter injury is a significant risk factor for the development of anal incontinence, with approximately 10% of women developing symptoms within a year following vaginal birth. Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries have significant medicolegal implications and contribute greatly to healthcare costs. For example, in 2013 and 2014, the economic burden of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries in the United Kingdom ranged between £3.7 million (with assisted vaginal birth) and £9.8 million (with spontaneous vaginal birth). In the United States, complications associated with trauma to the perineum incurred costs of approximately $83 million between 2007 and 2011. It is therefore crucial to focus on improvements in clinical care to reduce this risk and minimize the development of perineal trauma, particularly obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. Identification of risk factors allows modification of obstetrical practice with the aim of reducing the rate of perineal trauma and its attendant associated morbidity. Risk factors associated with second-degree perineal trauma include increased fetal birthweight, operative vaginal birth, prolonged second stage of labor, maternal birth position, and advanced maternal age. With obstetrical anal sphincter injury, risk factors include induction of labor, augmentation of labor, epidural, increased fetal birthweight, fetal malposition (occiput posterior), midline episiotomy, operative vaginal birth, Asian ethnicity, and primiparity. Obstetrical practice can be modified both antenatally and intrapartum. The evidence suggests that in the antenatal period, perineal massage can be commenced in the third trimester of pregnancy to increase muscle elasticity and allow stretching of the perineum during birth, thereby reducing the risk of tearing or need for episiotomy. With regard to the intrapartum period, there is a growing body of evidence from the United Kingdom, Norway, and Denmark suggesting that the implementation of quality improvement initiatives including the training of clinicians in manual perineal protection and mediolateral episiotomy can reduce the incidence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury. With episiotomy, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics recommends restrictive rather than routine use of episiotomy. This is particularly the case with unassisted vaginal births. However, there is a role for episiotomy, specifically mediolateral or lateral, with assisted vaginal births. This is specifically the case with nulliparous vacuum and forceps births, given that the use of mediolateral or lateral episiotomy has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury in these groups by 43% and 68%, respectively. However, the complications associated with episiotomy including perineal pain, dyspareunia, and sexual dysfunction should be acknowledged. Despite considerable research, interventions for reducing the risk of perineal trauma remain a subject of controversy. In this review article, we present the available data on the prevention of perineal trauma by describing the risk factors associated with perineal trauma and interventions that can be implemented to prevent perineal trauma, in particular obstetrical anal sphincter injury.

Cervical Lacerations: A Review of Risks.

Cervical laceration (CL), although infrequent, is an often-unrecognized complication of vaginal birth and can cause significant blood loss in the immediate postpartum period. The rate of clinically significant CL ranges from 0.14% to 0.2% of births. Nulliparity, operative vaginal birth, occiput posterior position of the fetus, induction of labor, and episiotomy have been cited as possible risk factors. Much of the available literature regarding CL, however, is dated or anecdotal, and there are varying and inconsistent risk associations with its occurrence. Given this unpredictability, CL should be considered in all women with immediate postpartum hemorrhage when there is difficulty obtaining hemostasis. Although midwives receive training about CLs, the low incidence may lead to delay in diagnosis and management. This Clinical Rounds case presents a composite case of postpartum hemorrhage caused by a CL. Risk factors, diagnosis and midwifery management are discussed.

Predelivery sonographic predictors of obstetric anal sphincter injury among nulliparous women.

OBJECTIVE: Data available at admission to delivery of nulliparous has rarely been investigated for prediction of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). The aim of the present study was to study risk factors for OASI in nulliparous based on information available at admission. METHODS: A retrospective study of all nulliparous women undergoing labor, during March 2011 to January 2021 was performed. We compared women with OASI following delivery to those without by univariate and multivariable regression. RESULTS: A total of 30 262 deliveries were included and 4181 (13.4%) of those were delivered by an emergent cesarean delivery. OASI followed 453 (1.5%) deliveries. Women in the OASI group were younger 29 ± 4.4 versus 30 ± 4.8, P = 0.001. In a multivariable regression analysis, higher sonographic estimated fetal weight was positively associated with OASI occurrence (aOR, 95% CI: 1.13 [1.00-1.29]). Maternal age was inversely associated with OASI occurrence (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95 [0.92-0.97]). CONCLUSION: Sonographic fetal weight estimation is an independent risk factor for OASI occurrence that may be available at admission for delivery among nulliparous women.

A systematic review and a meta-analysis on the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries during vaginal delivery.

AIM: The incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) has increased in the past two decades despite improved awareness of the risk factors. This study aimed to define the incidence of OASIS in women with different features (instrumental delivery or other variables). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted on articles reporting the incidence of OASIS. This review aims to examine the association of instrumentation and OASIS by performing a formal systematic review of the published literature. Databases used for the research were MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and 'Maternity and infant care' databases. RESULTS: Two independent reviewers screened the selected articles. 2326 duplicates were removed from the total of 4907 articles. The remaining 2581 articles were screened for title and abstract. 1913 articles were excluded due to irrelevance. The remaining 300 were screened as full text. Primiparity associated with the use of forceps were the features associated with the highest incidence of OASIS in the selected articles (19.4%). OASIS in all women had an overall incidence of 3.8%. The incidence of OASIS in all women by geographical region was the highest (6.5%) in North America. CONCLUSIONS: There are various factors that impact on the incidence of OASIS and the combination of some of these, such as the use of forceps in primiparas, resulted in the highest incidence of OASIS. The lack of international consensus is limiting the improvements that can be done to reduce OASIS rates and improve best clinical practice.

Knowledge of obstetric danger signs and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care services at Thai community hospital.

BACKGROUND: To decrease preventable maternal mortality, providing health education to all parties is mandatory. Good knowledge, including awareness of pregnant women regarding obstetric danger signs (ODS), leads to appropriate practices and services. The knowledge of ODS varies among countries and regions. Since the data in rural regions of Thailand remains unavailable, this study aimed to identify the prevalence of good ODS knowledge and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal services at a Thai community hospital. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional, analytical study in 415 singleton pregnant women who visited the antenatal clinic at Wang Saphung Hospital, Loei, Thailand. A well-trained research assistant interviewed all participants using the data record form containing twenty items on the demographic and obstetric data and sixteen items on ODS knowledge. An ODS score of at least 75% (12 points) was considered a good level of knowledge. RESULTS: A total of 275 participants (66.27%) had good knowledge of ODS. The most recognized ODS was vaginal bleeding whereas the least recognized ODS during pregnancy was convulsion; the least recognized ODS during labor and delivery was retained placenta. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the predictive factors of good OBS knowledge included a higher education level, maternal age of at least 20 years, and having medical personnel as a source of knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: In a rural setting of Thailand, two-thirds of pregnant women had good ODS knowledge. Identifying those at risk for fair and poor ODS knowledge and prompt management for the vulnerable subgroups might help decrease maternal mortality.

Is an episiotomy always necessary during an operative vaginal delivery with vacuum? A longitudinal study.

Objective: The use of episiotomy during operative vaginal birth (OVB) is rather debated among operators and in literature. It is also important to evaluate the indications for which episiotomy is performed. In fact, the consequences of an episiotomy can be invalidating for patients with long-lasting results. The aim of this study is the evaluation of the role of episiotomy during OVB with the vacuum extractor and its correlation with Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIs).Methods: On of 9165 vaginal births, a total of 498 OVB (5.4%) were enrolled in a longitudinal prospective observational study. The incidence of OASIs was evaluated in our population after OVB performed with the vacuum extractor, during which the execution of episiotomy was performed indicated by clinician in charge.Results: OASIs occurred in 4% of the patients (n = 20). Episiotomy was performed in 39% of them (n = 181). OASIs incidence was 6% (n = 17) in the No Episiotomy and 1.8% (n = 3) in Episiotomy group (p<.001). Performance of episiotomy during OVB determined a protective effect against OASIs (p = 0.025 in full cohort and p = 0.013 in the primiparous group). An expulsive phase under one hour was an almost significant protective factor (p = 0.052).Conclusions: The use of episiotomy during OVB was associated with much lower OASIs rates in nulliparous women with a vacuum extraction; OR 0.23 (CI 95% 0.07-0.81) p = 0.037 in nulliparous women and the number necessary to treat was 18 among nulliparous women to prevent 1 OASIs. A further risk factor that emerged from the analysis is a prolonged expulsive period, whereas fundal pressure does not seem to have a statistically significant influence.

Assessment of Organ Dysfunction and Underlying Causes in Maternal Near-miss Cases at Health Care Facilities in Doiwala Block of District Dehradun - A Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: The extent of maternal morbidity is a good gauge of a nation's maternal health care system. Maternal near-miss (MNM) cases need to be reviewed because they can indirectly contribute significantly to reducing the maternal mortality ratio in India. MNM cases can provide useful information in this context. Such women who survive these life-threatening conditions arising from complications during pregnancy, childbirth and post partum (42 days) share many commonalities with those who die because of such complications. AIM: To assess the organ dysfunction and the underlying causes, associated/contributory factors associated with "maternal near-miss" cases in pregnant, in labor, post-partum women (upto42 days) in the health care facilities of Doiwala block, district Dehradun. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was conducted over a period of 6 months under the Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh. The cross-sectional study included the medical record files of all pregnant women attending the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, in the selected healthcare facilities of Doiwala block, district Dehradun. This study was conducted as per the WHO criteria for "near-miss" by using convenience sampling for the selection of healthcare facilities. The medical record files of all women who were pregnant, in labor, or who had delivered or aborted up to 42 days were included from a period of 01.06.2021 - 31.05.2022. RESULTS: It was found that Out of the women with maternal near-miss (n=91), the majority of women had coagulation /hematological dysfunction (n=45, 49.4%), followed by neurologic dysfunction (n=15, 16.4%), cardio-vascular dysfunction (n=11, 12%). Out of the total women with a maternal near-miss (n = 91), 10 women underwent multiple organ dysfunctions. Of the total 91 maternal near-miss cases, the underlying cause of near-miss was obstetric hemorrhage in almost half the participants (n=45, 49.5%) followed by hypertensive disorders (n=36, 39.5%). Eleven women had a pregnancy with abortive outcomes (12%) and 7 women had pregnancy-related infection. It was also seen that, out of 91 near-miss women, the leading contributory /associated cause was Anemia (n=89, 97.8%) followed by women having a history of previous cesarean section (n=63, 69.2%). Sixteen women had prolonged /obstructed labor (n = 16, 17.58%). CONCLUSION: Pregnancy should be a positive experience for every woman of childbearing age. A better understanding of pregnancy-related conditions enables early detection of complications and prevents the conversion of mild to moderate maternal morbidity outcomes to severe maternal outcomes with long-term health implications or death. There are already effective measures in place to reduce maternal and newborn mortality and morbidity.

Risk indicators for obstetrical anal sphincter injury in vaginal birth after caesarean section compared to first vaginal delivery.

OBJECTIVES: Comparison of the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) between women having their first vaginal birth after caesarean section (CS) and true nulliparous women with a vaginal delivery. Assessment of risk indicators for OASI in women with vaginal birth after one CS (VBAC). STUDY DESIGN: 28 535 women with their first VBAC and a cohort of 275 439 nulliparous women with a vaginal delivery of a liveborn infant in a cephalic position from the Dutch perinatal registry were analyzed. We compared the OASI rate with univariate and multivariate analysis. In women with VBAC possible risk indicators for OASI were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The rate of OASI was 5.2% in women with vaginal birth after CS and 4.0% in women with a first vaginal delivery. The adjusted OR (aOR) for vaginal birth after an elective CS was higher (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.23-1.47) compared to vaginal birth after an emergency CS (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08-1.25). In women with vaginal birth after emergency CS, the aOR for the indication non-progressive labor was 1.18 (95% CI 1.08-1.29), whereas CS for suspected fetal distress was not significantly associated with obstetric anal sphincter injury in VBAC. In the 28 535 women with a VBAC, mediolateral episiotomy (MLE), birth weight < 3000 g and maternal age < 25 years were associated with a significantly lower rate of OASI. A gestational age of 42 weeks, birth weight ≥ 3500 g, operative vaginal delivery and duration of the 2nd stage of labour of ≥ 60 min were associated with a significantly higher rate of OASI. CONCLUSIONS: Women with a VBAC have a higher rate of OASI in comparison with women with a first vaginal delivery, with the exception of women with a vaginal birth after an emergency CS for suspected fetal distress. Factors associated with a significantly lower rate for OASI were MLE, maternal age < 25 and birth weight < 3000 g. A gestational age of 42 weeks, birth weight between 3500 and 4000 g and ≥ 4000 g, operative vaginal delivery and duration of the 2nd stage of delivery longer dan 60 min were associated with a significantly higher rate of OASI.

Re-evaluation of modifiable risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury in a real-world setting.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to identify modifiable risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) in primiparous women. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of primiparous women with a singleton vaginal delivery. Main outcome measures were incidence of OASI and odds ratios for possible risk factors: maternal age, body mass index and height, fetal birthweight and head circumference, gestational age, epidural analgesia, mediolateral episiotomy, and instrumental deliveries. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed using forward methods for variable selection. RESULTS: Of 19,786 primiparous women with a singleton vaginal delivery, 369 sustained an OASI (1.9%). Risk factors were identified: vacuum extraction (adjusted OR 2.06, 95% CI, 1.59-2.65, p < 0.001), increased fetal weight (aOR 1.06, 95% CI, 1.02-1.11, p = 0.002, per 100-g increments); head circumference (aOR 1.24, 95% CI, 1.13-1.35, p < 0.001, per 1-cm increments); gestational week (aOR 1.11, 95% CI, 1.02-1.2, p = 0.012, per week). Protective factors: mediolateral episiotomy (aOR 0.75, 95% CI, 0.59-0.94, p = 0.013) particularly in vacuum deliveries (aOR 0.50, 95% CI, 0.29-0.97, p = 0.040); epidural analgesia (aOR 0.64, 95% CI, 0.48-0.84, p = 0.001); maternal height ≥157 cm (aOR 0.97, 95% CI, 0.96-0.98, p = 0.006, risk decreases by 2.6% per 1 cm increase in height). CONCLUSIONS: Mediolateral episiotomy was protective against OASI in both spontaneous and instrumental deliveries of primiparae. Increased fetal weight and large fetal head circumference, particularly in short women, were significant risk factors. These findings support the performance of ultrasound to acquire updated fetal measures before admission to the labor ward.

The influence of the attending midwife on the occurrence of episiotomy: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Episiotomy at the time of vaginal birth can result in short- and long-term complications for women. Therefore, it is important to study factors that influence the occurrence of episiotomy. AIM: To examine to what extent the individual factors of clinical midwives in the same working conditions contribute to variations in episiotomy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed at a secondary care hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, using data from women who were assisted by a clinical midwife during birth in 2016. The clinical midwives filled out a questionnaire to determine individual factors. The predictive value of the individual factors of the clinical midwives was examined in a multiple logistic regression model on episiotomy. RESULTS: A total of 1302 births attended by 27 midwives were included. The mean episiotomy rate was 12.7%, with a range from 3.2% to 30.8% among midwives (p = 0.001). When stratified for parity, within the primipara group there was a significant variation in episiotomy among midwives with a range from 7.9% to 47.8% (p = 0.006). No significant variation was found in the occurrence of third/fourth degree tears or intact perineum. There was a significant difference in episiotomy for maternal indication among midwives (p = 0.041). Predictors for an episiotomy were number of years since graduation and place of bachelor education of the clinical midwife. CONCLUSION: This study shows that individual factors of clinical midwives influence the rate of episiotomy. Predictors for an episiotomy were the number of years since graduation and place of bachelor education. This shows that continuous training of clinical midwives could contribute to reducing the number of unnecessary episiotomies. Since suspected fetal distress is the only evidence based indication to perform an episiotomy, there is room for improvement given the variation in the number of episiotomies performed for maternal indication.

Predictive factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to perform a systematic review of predictive factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) occurrence at first vaginal delivery, with the diagnosis made by ultrasound (US-OASI). The secondary objective was to report on incidence rates of sonographic anal sphincter (AS) trauma, including trauma that was not clinically reported at childbirth, among the studies providing data for our primary objective. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Both observational cohort studies and interventional trials were eligible for inclusion. Study eligibility was assessed independently by two authors. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to pool effect estimates from studies reporting on similar predictive factors. Summary odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) is reported with 95% CI. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. RESULTS: A total of 2805 records were screened and 21 met the inclusion criteria (16 prospective cohort studies, three retrospective cohort studies and two interventional non-randomized trials). Increasing gestational age at delivery (MD, 0.34 (95% CI, 0.04-0.64) weeks), shorter antepartum perineal body length (MD, -0.60 (95% CI, -1.09 to -0.11) cm), labor augmentation (OR, 1.81 (95% CI, 1.21-2.71)), instrumental delivery (OR, 2.13 (95% CI, 1.13-4.01)), in particular forceps extraction (OR, 3.56 (95% CI, 1.31-9.67)), shoulder dystocia (OR, 12.07 (95% CI, 1.06-137.60)), episiotomy use (OR, 1.85 (95% CI, 1.11-3.06)) and shorter episiotomy length (MD, -0.40 (95% CI, -0.75 to -0.05) cm) were associated with US-OASI. When pooling incidence rates, 26% (95% CI, 20-32%) of women who had a first vaginal delivery had US-OASI (20 studies; I2 = 88%). In studies reporting on both clinical and US-OASI rates, 20% (95% CI, 14-28%) of women had AS trauma on ultrasound that was not reported clinically at childbirth (16 studies; I2 = 90%). No differences were found in maternal age, body mass index, weight, subpubic arch angle, induction of labor, epidural analgesia, episiotomy angle, duration of first/second/active-second stages of labor, vacuum extraction, neonatal birth weight or head circumference between cases with and those without US-OASI. Antenatal perineal massage and use of an intrapartum pelvic floor muscle dilator did not affect the odds of US-OASI. Most (81%) studies were judged to be at high risk of bias in at least one domain and only four (19%) studies had an overall low risk of bias. CONCLUSION: Given the ultrasound evidence of structural damage to the AS in 26% of women following a first vaginal delivery, clinicians should have a low threshold of suspicion for the condition. This systematic review identified several predictive factors for this. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Trends in obstetric anal sphincter injury in spontaneous vaginal delivery versus operative vaginal delivery over a 10-year period: Lessons learned.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends in the incidence of women with obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) over a 10-year period comparing spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) and operative vaginal delivery (OVD). METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in which all women who underwent vaginal delivery over a 10-year period (n = 86 242, 2009-2018) at the Rotunda Hospital were reviewed. The overall incidence of OASIS was compared with incidence rates stratified by parity and type of vaginal birth. RESULTS: The 10-year vaginal delivery rate was 69% (n = 59 187) where 24 580 women (42%) were primiparous and 34 607 women (58%) were multiparous. SVD rate was 74% and OVD rate was 26%. The overall incidence of OASIS was 2.9%. The incidence of OASIS in OVD was 5.5% and the incidence in SVD was 2%. Of 498 multipara who sustained OASIS, 366 (73%) had an SVD without episiotomy compared with 14 (3%) who had an episiotomy. There was a significant reduction of OASIS over the 10-year period in primipara who had an OVD but no reduction in the other groups. CONCLUSION: The primiparous OVD group had a significant reduction of OASIS. Continued education around perineal protection and episiotomy at SVD could positively impact further reduction in OASIS, particularly in the SVD groups.

Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries following breech compared to cephalic vaginal births.

INTRODUCTION: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) at the time of childbirth can lead to serious consequences including anal incontinence, dyspareunia, pain and rectovaginal fistula. These types of lesions and their incidence have been well studied after cephalic presentation deliveries, but no publications have specifically addressed this issue in the context of vaginal breech delivery. The goal of our study was to evaluate the incidence of OASIs following breech deliveries and compare it with cephalic presentation births. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study involving 670 women. Of these, 224 and 446 had a vaginal birth of a fetus in the breech (breech group) and cephalic (cephalic group) presentations respectively. Both groups were matched for birthweight (± 200 g), date of delivery (± 2 years) and vaginal parity. Main outcome of interest was to evaluate the incidence of OASIs following breech vaginal birth compared to cephalic vaginal births. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of intact perineum or first-degree tear, second-degree perineal tear and rates of episiotomies in each group. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in OASIs incidence between the breech and cephalic groups (0.9% vs. 1.1%; RR 0.802 (0.157; 4.101); p = 0.31). There were more episiotomies in the breech group (12.5% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.0012) and the rate of intact or first-degree perineum was similar in both groups (74.1% vs. 75.3%, p = 0.7291). A sub-analysis excluding patients with episiotomy and history of OASIs did not show any statistically significant difference either. CONCLUSION: We did not demonstrate a significant difference in the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries between women who had a breech vaginal birth compared to cephalic.

Correlation of anorectal symptoms and endoanal ultrasound findings after obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

INTRODUCTION: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) predispose to development of anorectal symptoms that affect women's quality of life. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted for all women with singleton vaginal deliveries who had a primary OASIS repair and attended the Postpartum Perineal Clinic between July 1st 2017 and December 31st 2020. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Board. The purpose of this study was (1) to determine correlation between endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) findings and anorectal symptoms quantified by the St. Mark's Incontinence Score (SMIS), (2) to determine the incidence of residual anal sphincter defects, and (3) to determine the rate of clinical overdiagnosis of OASIS. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation between anorectal symptoms and EAUS findings. RESULTS: A total of 247 participants with clinical diagnosis of OASIS met the inclusion criteria. A 3rd-degree tear was identified in 126 (51.0%) and 4th-degree tear was identified in 30 (12.1%) participants. In participants with sonographic evidence of OASIS, there was a statistically significant weak positive correlation between the size of residual defect and SMIS for both external anal sphincter (EAS) (r = .3723, p < .0001) and internal anal sphincter (IAS) (r = .3122, p = .0180). Residual defect in the anorectal sphincter of greater than 1 hour (> 30°) in width was present in 64.3% participants with 3rd-degree tear and 86.7% participants with 4th-degree tear. The rate of overdiagnosis was 36.8%. CONCLUSION: The size of residual defect of EAS and IAS has a weak positive correlation with anorectal symptoms, emphasizing the importance of EAUS for counselling regarding mode of subsequent delivery.

Establishing the Ethiopian Obstetric Surveillance System for Monitoring Maternal Outcomes in Eastern Ethiopia: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Although the majority of maternal deaths and complications occur in low-resource settings, almost all existing strong registration and confidential enquiry systems are found in high-resource settings. We developed and piloted the Ethiopian Obstetric Surveillance System (EthOSS), based on the successful United Kingdom Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS) methodology, in 3 regions in Ethiopia to improve ongoing surveillance and tracking of maternal morbidities and deaths, as well as confidential enquiry, compared to the currently used maternal death surveillance and response program in Ethiopia. METHODS: We launched the EthOSS monthly case notification system in 13 hospitals in eastern Ethiopia in April 2021. Study participants included women admitted to the hospitals from April to September 2021 with major adverse obstetric conditions during pregnancy, childbirth, or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy. Designated clinicians at the hospitals used a simple online system to report the number of cases and maternal deaths monthly to the EthOSS team. We present findings on the incidence and case fatality rates for adverse conditions included in the EthOSS. RESULTS: Over the 6-month pilot period, 904 women with at least 1 EthOSS condition were included in the study, of whom 10 died (case fatality rate, 1.1%). Almost half (46.6%, 421/904) sustained major obstetric hemorrhage, 38.7% (350/904) severe anemia, 29.5% (267/904) eclampsia, 8.8% (80/904) sepsis, and 2.2% (20/904) uterine rupture. To enable care improvement alongside surveillance, the local committee received training on confidential enquiry into maternal deaths from internal and external experts. CONCLUSIONS: In this facility-based project, data on severe adverse obstetric conditions were captured through voluntary reporting by clinicians. Further analysis is essential to assess the robustness of these data, and confidential enquiry into maternal deaths for specific cases is planned to investigate the appropriateness of care.