Conciliação medicamentosa na admissão de pacientes transplantados renais em um hospital universitário / Medication reconciliation in the admission of kidney transplant patients to a university hospital

Introdução:O presente estudo considerou conciliações medicamentosas realizadas na admissão hospitalar de pacientes transplantados renais e intervenções farmacêuticas decorrentes desse processo.Métodos:Trata-se de um estudo transversal realizado no período de julho de 2018 a julho de 2019 no Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Foram coletadas as características dos pacientes, as conciliações medicamentosas realizadas pelo farmacêutico clínico, as discrepâncias identificadas pelo mesmo (intencionais e não intencionais) e o resultado das intervenções. Os medicamentos foram classificados de acordo com a Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical (ATC).Resultados:Dos 719 pacientes acompanhados pelo farmacêutico clínico, 175 tiveram a conciliação medicamentosa de admissão realizada, desses, 56 apresentaram discrepâncias não intencionais. Encontramos a média de 2,2 medicamentos omissos por prescrição com desvio padrão de 1,3 medicamentos. No total, foram realizadas 122 intervenções farmacêuticas, sendo que em 61,5% houve adesão por parte da equipe médica. A classe terapêutica com maior ocorrência (43,4%) de discrepâncias não intencionais foi a que atuava sobre o aparelho cardiovascular. As variáveis observadas foram sexo, número de medicamentos nas intervenções (ambas com associação significativa com a adesão médica), idade, tempo de internação, número de medicamentos na internação e número de medicamentos de uso prévio (estas últimas sem associação significativa com a adesão médica). Conclusões:A conciliação medicamentosa previne possíveis erros de medicação, uma vez que a identificação das discrepâncias não intencionais na prescrição médica gera sinalizações que são levadas pelo farmacêutico clínico à equipe assistente, a fim garantir o uso seguro e correto dos medicamentos durante a internação hospitalar.

Introduction:This study considered medication reconciliations performed on hospital admission of kidney transplant patients and pharmaceutical interventions resulting from this process.Methods:This is a cross-sectional study carried out from July 2018 to July 2019 at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. The characteristics of the patients, the medication reconciliations performed by the clinical pharmacist, the discrepancies identified by the same (intentional and unintentional) and the result of the interventions were collected. The drugs were classified according to the Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical (ATC). Results:Of the 719 patients monitored by the clinical pharmacist, 175 had medication reconciliation on admission performed, of which 56 had unintentional discrepancies. We found an average of 2.2 missing medications per prescription with a standard deviation of 1.3 medications. In total, 122 pharmaceutical interventions were performed, and in 61.5% there was adherence by the medical team. The therapeutic class with the highest occurrence (43.4%) of unintentional discrepancies was that which acted on the cardiovascular system. The variables observed were gender, number of medications in interventions (both with a significant association with medical adherence), age, length of stay, number of medications in hospitalization and number of medications previously used (the latter without a significant association with medical adherence).Conclusions:Medication reconciliation prevents possible medication errors, since the identification of unintentional discrepancies in the medical prescription generates signals that are taken by the clinical pharmacist to the assistant team, in order to guarantee the safe and correct use of medications during hospitalization.

Effect of Medication Reconciliation at Hospital Admission on 30-Day Returns to Hospital: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: According to international recommendations, hospitals should use medication reconciliation to prevent medication errors and improve patient safety. Objective: To assess the impact of medication reconciliation at hospital admission on patient-centered health care outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This parallel group, open-label randomized controlled trial used centralized randomization to the intervention group (ie, individuals with medication reconciliation) or control group (ie, individuals with only standard, physician-acquired medication history). Outcome assessors and data analysts were blinded to group allocation. Participants included 1702 patients aged 85 years or older, with more than 10 medications at hospital admission, or meeting both conditions at 2 regional secondary teaching hospitals in southern Switzerland. Study duration was 14.5 months, from November 1, 2018, to January 15, 2020. Data were analyzed from December 2018 through March 2020. Interventions: Medication reconciliation was performed at hospital admission in 3 steps: (1) the pharmacy assistant obtained the list of the patient's current medications (ie, the best possible medication history [BPMH]); (2) the clinical pharmacist led reconciliation of the BPMH with the list of home medications recorded at hospital admission by the attending physician (according to the hospital standard procedure); and (3) medication discrepancies were communicated to the attending physician, and, when necessary, medications prescribed at admission were adapted. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite postdischarge health care use variable quantified as the proportion of patients with unplanned all-cause hospital visits (including visits to the emergency department and hospital readmissions) within 30 days after discharge from the hospital when medication reconciliation took place. A time-to-event analysis was performed. Results: Among 1702 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 86.0 [79.0-89.0] years; 720 [42.3%] men), 866 patients (50.9%) were allocated to the intervention group and 836 patients (49.1%) to the control group. The primary outcome occurred among 340 participants (39.3%) in the intervention group and 330 participants (39.5%) in the control group (P = .93). In time-to-event analyses at study closeout, unplanned all-cause hospital visits to the emergency department (log-rank P = .08) and unplanned all-cause hospital readmissions (log-rank P = .10) occurred similarly in the intervention and control groups. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that medication reconciliation at hospital admission has no impact on postdischarge health care outcomes among patients aged 85 years or older, with more than 10 medications at hospital admission, or meeting both conditions. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03654963.

High occurrence of postintensive care syndrome identified in surgical ICU survivors after implementation of a multidisciplinary clinic.

BACKGROUND: Postintensive care syndrome (PICS) has been identified in a large proportion of medical intensive care unit survivors; however, the occurrence surgical intensive care unit (SICU) survivors is unknown. We implemented a multidisciplinary critical care outpatient clinic (CCOC) to identify the occurrence of PICS in SICU survivors. METHODS: Seventy acute care surgery and trauma patients, 18 years or older, who remained in the SICU for 72 hours or longer at a Level I trauma center were seen in CCOC at 2 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after hospital discharge. The CCOC staffing included a nurse coordinator, social worker, critical care pharmacist, physical therapist, and acute care surgeon who identified PICS sequelae in their respective specialties by clinical criteria and screening questionnaires. RESULTS: Of 82 eligible patients, 70 (85.4%) were seen at least once for 116 total visits. Forty-three (61.4%) patients suffered traumatic injuries and 27 (38.6%) underwent emergent general surgery. Sixty-seven (95.7%) demonstrated at least one PICS criterion. Over all visits, 26 (37.1%) patients presented with one PICS criterion, 24 (34.3%) patients with two, and 17 (24.3%) with three. Cognitive impairment was observed in 29 (41.4%) patients, psychiatric in 30 (42.9%), and physical symptoms in 65 (92.9%). Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care scores improved from severe impairment at admission to full function by 12 weeks postdischarge, yet 6 Minute Walk Test scores remained below age-matched references through all visits. Patients expressed mild to moderate depression based on Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores. A medication reconciliation was completed at 96.5% (112/116) of the visits with 116 total medication recommendations. By 24 weeks following discharge, only 26.4% (14/53) of previously employed patients had resumed work. CONCLUSION: Through the successful implementation of a multidisciplinary CCOC, this study identifies an exorbitant rate of PICS among SICU survivors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/epidemiological, level III.

Impact of an integrated medication reconciliation model led by a hospital clinical pharmacist on the reduction of post-discharge unintentional discrepancies.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: There is no optimal standardized model in the transfer of care between hospitals and primary healthcare facilities. Transfer of care is a critical point during which unintentional discrepancies, that can jeopardize pharmacotherapy outcomes, can occur. The objective was to determine the effect that an integrated medication reconciliation model has on the reduction of the number of post-discharge unintentional discrepancies. METHODS: A randomized controlled study was conducted on an elderly patient population. The intervention group of patients received a medication reconciliation model, led entirely by a hospital clinical pharmacist (medication reconciliation at admission, review and optimization of pharmacotherapy during hospitalization, patient education and counselling, medication reconciliation at discharge, medication reconciliation as part of primary health care in collaboration with a primary care physician and a community pharmacist). Unintentional discrepancies were identified by comparing the medications listed on the discharge summary with the first list of medications prescribed and issued at primary care level, immediately after discharge. The main outcome measures were incidence, type and potential severity of post-discharge unintentional discrepancies. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 353 patients were analysed (182 in the intervention and 171 in the control group). The medication reconciliation model, led by a hospital clinical pharmacist, significantly reduced the number of patients with unintentional discrepancies by 57.1% (p < 0.001). The intervention reduced the number of patients with unintentional discrepancies associated with a potential moderate harm by 58.6% (p < 0.001) and those associated with a potential severe harm by 68.6% (p = 0.039). The most common discrepancies were incorrect dosage, drug omission and drug commission. Cardiovascular medications were most commonly involved in unintentional discrepancies. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The integrated medication reconciliation model, led by a hospital clinical pharmacist in collaboration with all health professionals involved in the patient's pharmacotherapy and treatment, significantly reduced unintentional discrepancies in the transfer of care.

Conciliación de la medicación al ingreso en el servicio de cirugía ortopédica y traumatológica / Medication reconciliation at admission to The Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department

INTRODUCCIÓN: Identificar las discrepancias existentes entre la medicación prescrita al ingreso en el servicio de traumatología y la medicación habitual de los pacientes, determinar la prevalencia de errores de conciliación y analizar el grado de aceptación de las intervenciones farmacéuticas realizadas para su resolución. MÉTODO: Estudio prospectivo de dos años de duración en un hospital comarcal público de España donde se seleccionaron los pacientes ingresados en traumatología con algún medicación domiciliario prescrito. Tras 24-48 horas del ingreso, el farmacéutico realizó la conciliación de la medicación, comparando la orden médica prescrita al ingreso con el tratamiento domiciliario. Se identificaron las discrepancias comunicándose al médico y se analizó el grado de aceptación de las recomendaciones. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 756 pacientes, con un total de 834 episodios de hospitalización; 66,1% mujeres, edad media: 72 ± 12,3 años, media de medicamentos domiciliarios por paciente: 8,1 ± 4,3. Se analizaron 8422 prescripciones, identificándose un 57,5% de discrepancias. La mayoría de las discrepancias no justificadas se debieron a omisión de medicamento (75%) seguido de la modificación de la posología o vía de un medicamento (19,1%). En el 87,4% de los episodios se encontró al menos una discrepancia. Las recomendaciones propuestas por el farmacéutico fueron aceptadas en el 69,9% de los casos. CONCLUSIONES: Existe un alta prevalencia de errores de conciliación al ingreso en el servicio de traumatología. Esta metodología ha permitido la coordinación del farmacéutico con el resto de profesionales implicados en la conciliación de la medicación, con el fin de detectar y resolver las discrepancias de medicación y reducir así los errores

INTRODUCTION: We aim to describe a method that would ensure continuity of patient care as regards drug therapy at admission to the orthopaedic surgery and traumatology department, identify the reconciliation discrepancies, determine the prevalence of reconciliation errors and analyse the acceptance of the pharmacist interventions. METHODS: Prospective observational study was conducted for two years in a regional public hospital in Spain. The study included patients hospitalized in the Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department with chronic medi¬cation prescribed. At 24-48 hours after hospital admission, the pharmacist compared the pre-admission pharmaco¬logical treatment of patients with the medication received in hospital to identify and reconciliation discrepancies. They were communicated and we analysed the acceptance of the pharmacist interventions. RESULTS: The study included 756 patients, with a total of 834 hospitalization episodes, 66,1% of whom were women, mean age: 72±12,3 years and a mean of 8,1±4,3 drugs. We analysed 8422 prescriptions, 57,5% reconciliation discrep¬ancies. The most frequent unjustified discrepancies were drug omission (75,2%), following by modification of the dose or route of administration (19,1%). There was at least one medication reconciliation discrepancy in 87,4% of hospitalization episodes. Pharmacist recommendations were accepted in 69,9% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: There was a high prevalence of reconciliation errors among patients admitted to the Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department. This methodology has allowed a workflow to be established that facilitates coordination between the pharmacist and others healthcare providers, to identify and resolve medication discrepancies to reduce medication errors

Acompanhamento clínico farmacêutico no cuidado ao paciente adulto-cirúrgico em um hospital universitário de Porto Alegre / Clinical pharmacist follow-up in adult surgical patient care in a university hospital of Porto Alegre

Introdução: O farmacêutico clínico já está bem estabelecido em algumas instituições e muitos serviços de saúde contam com este profissional em suas equipes, entretanto, poucos conseguem sistematizar o seu trabalho e mapear os dados das atividades desenvolvidas, demonstrando a relevância do profissional na equipe de saúde. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o acompanhamento clínico-farmacêutico em uma unidade de internação adulto-cirúrgica em um hospital universitário de Porto Alegre. Métodos: Estudo descritivo retrospectivo que quantificou as principais atividades do farmacêutico clínico em uma unidade de internação adulto-cirúrgica no período de janeiro a maio de 2019. Este projeto foi aprovado no Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa da referida instituição. Resultados: 859 pacientes foram admitidos na unidade cirúrgica avaliada, dos quais 490 foram revisados pelo farmacêutico na admissão hospitalar, correspondendo à taxa média de 57,27%. A taxa média de conciliação medicamentosa realizada foi de 14,83%, totalizando 73 pacientes conciliados por entrevista. 361 intervenções farmacêuticas foram realizadas no período estudado, sendo 54 relacionadas a conciliação medicamentosa, com o número total de adesões de 232. As principais especialidades cirúrgicas que internam pacientes na unidade em questão foram a Ortopedia, Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo, Urologia e Cirurgia Vascular. Conclusões: Foi possível avaliar o acompanhamento clínico farmacêutico em uma unidade de internação adulto-cirúrgica em um hospital universitário de Porto Alegre, através da quantificação das taxas de pacientes revisados e de conciliação medicamentosa, do número de intervenções farmacêuticas e suas adesões, além de caracterizar as principais especialidades médicas cirúrgicas envolvidas. (AU)

Introduction: Clinical pharmacists are already well established in some institutions, and many health services have these professionals in their teams. However, few are able to systematize their work and map data from the developed activities, demonstrating the relevance of these professionals in the health team. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical pharmacist follow-up in an adult surgical inpatient unit in a university hospital in Porto Alegre. Methods: This is a retrospective, descriptive study that quantified the main activities of the clinical pharmacist in an adult surgical inpatient unit from January to May 2019. This project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the institution. Results: Of 859 patients admitted to the s rgical unit, 490 were reviewed by the pharmacist on hospital admission, corresponding to an average rate of 57.27%. The average medication reconciliation rate was 14.83%, totaling 73 patients reconciled per interview. Of 361 pharmaceutical interventions performed during the study period, 54 were related to medication reconciliation, and the total number of adhesions was 232. The main surgical specialties associated with admission to the study unit were Orthopedics, Digestive System Surgery, Urology, and Vascular Surgery. Conclusions: It was possible to evaluate the clinical pharmacist follow-up in an adult surgical inpatient unit in a university hospital in Porto Alegre by quantifying the rates of reviewed patients and medication reconciliations as well as the number of pharmaceutical interventions and their adherences, in addition to characterizing the main medical-surgical specialties involved. (AU)

The accuracy, completeness and timeliness of discharge medication information and implementing medication reconciliation: A cross-sectional survey of general practitioners.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: General practitioners (GPs) require accurate medication information to care for recently discharged hospital patients. Pre-discharge medication reconciliation improves the accuracy of patient medication lists that GPs receive. This study aimed to explore GPs' perceptions of the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of hospital discharge medication information, and how they undertake medication reconciliation. METHOD: Using a cross-sectional online survey, quantitative and qualitative data were collected from a convenience sample of GPs practising across the Gold Coast, Australia. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. RESULTS: Twelve GPs were recruited. Patient hospital discharge medication information was mostly accurate and complete, but delays in receiving this information affected the ability of GPs to undertake medication reconciliation. DISCUSSION: Receiving accurate and timely patient discharge medication information can reduce errors. Optimising the communication of medication information to GPs may improve patient safety.

[How complete is the Germany-wide standardised medication list ("Bundeseinheitlicher Medikationsplan")? An analysis at hospital admission.] / Wie vollständig ist der Bundeseinheitliche Medikationsplan? Eine Analyse bei Krankenhausaufnahme.

BACKGROUND: At inpatient admission, the timeliness and completeness of the Germany-wide standardised medication list ("Bundeseinheitlicher Medikationsplan") often seems inappropriate. It is also unclear which characteristics of the lists increase the probability of discrepancies. METHODS: A total of 100 medication lists of elective patients of a surgical clinic were retrospectively evaluated with regard to potential discrepancies compared to the standardised medication reconciliation. The discprepancies were assigned to 7 categories: drug taken is missing on the list, drug on the list is no longer taken, strength or dosage is missing at the list or is incorrect, or the documented dosage form is different. Advice on patient safety, involved drugs and dosage forms were also recorded. Multivariate analyses were used to investigate the influence of the timeliness, number of drugs and issuing medical specialty of the lists on the type and number of discrepancies. RESULTS: Compared to the medication reconciliation, 78 % (78/100) of the lists showed discrepancies. A total of 226 deviations (2.3 ±â€Š0.6 deviations/list) were documented. Most often, a drug was missing from the list (n = 103). Of all recommendations, 64 % (83/177) concerned the perioperative management of anticoagulants (n = 55) and antidiabetics (n = 28), corresponding to 62 % (62/100) of the lists. In the multivariate analysis, only the risk of incorrect information on strength and dosage increased significantly with the age of the lists (p = 0.047) and was more than twice as high when the list was more than one month old. CONCLUSIONS: The timeliness, completeness and aspects of patient safety must be comprehensively validated. Medication lists that are older than 1 month should be checked particularly critically with regard to information on strength and dosage and the plan should be updated accordingly at regular intervals.

Impact of collaborative clinician visits on postdischarge total cost of care in a polypharmacy population.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of a collaborative intervention by pharmacists and primary care clinicians on total cost of care, including costs of inpatient readmissions, emergency department visits, and outpatient care, at 30, 60, and 180 days after hospital discharge in a population of patients at high risk for readmission due to polypharmacy. METHODS: A retrospective study of cost outcomes in a cohort of adult patients discharged from a single institution from July 1, 2013 to March 25, 2016, was conducted. All patients had at least 10 medications listed on their discharge list, including at least 1 drug frequently associated with adverse events leading to hospital readmission. About half of the cohort (n = 496) attended a postdischarge visit involving both a pharmacist and a primary care clinician (a physician, physician assistant, or licensed nurse practitioner); this was designated the pharmacist/clinician collaborative (PCC) group. The remainder of the cohort (n = 500) attended a visit without pharmacist involvement; this was designated as the usual care (UC) group. Costs were compared using a quantile regression to assess the potential heterogeneous impacts of the PCC intervention across different parts of the cost distribution. All outcomes were adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics. RESULTS: At 30 days post index discharge, there was a significant decrease in total costs in the 10th and 90th cost quantiles in the PCC cohort vs the UC cohort, without a statistically significant decrease in the 25th, 50th or 75th quantiles. The difference was significant in the 75th and 90th quantiles at 60 days and in the 25th, 50th, and 75th quantiles at 180 days. There was a nonsignificant cost reduction in all other quantiles. CONCLUSION: Medically complex patients had a significantly lower total cost of care in approximately half of the adjusted cost quantiles at 30, 60, and 180 days after hospital discharge when they had a PCC visit. PCC visits can improve patient clinical outcomes while improving cost metrics.

Simplifying Medication Regimens for People Receiving Community-Based Home Care Services: Outcomes of a Non-Randomized Pilot and Feasibility Study.

PURPOSE: Being able to manage a complex medication regimen is key to older people continuing to live at home. This study determined the feasibility of a multi-component intervention to simplify medication regimens for people receiving community-based home care services. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Research nurses recruited people receiving community-based home care services to participate in this non-randomized pilot and feasibility study (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618001130257). Participants received a one-off clinical pharmacist intervention comprising medication reconciliation, assessment of capacity to self-manage medications, and application of a structured 5-step tool to identify medication simplification opportunities. A mixed-methods feasibility assessment with an explanatory design was undertaken to assess recruitment, protocol adherence and stakeholder acceptability. Data from interviews with 12 stakeholders were thematically analyzed. Secondary outcome measures, including medication discrepancies, and changes in number of medication administration times per day, quality of life, medication adherence and health service utilization, were determined over a 4-month follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-five out of the target 50 participants were recruited. Initial recruitment was impacted by apparent uncertain role responsibilities in medication management, with some clients who declined to participate perceiving they would be unlikely to benefit or being reluctant to change regimens. However, with few exceptions, participants who received intervention did so with a high degree of protocol adherence and acceptability. Stakeholders valued the intervention and supported wider implementation. Discrepancies between the baseline medication history from the general medical practitioner and the pharmacist-compiled "best possible medication history" were identified for all participants' regimens (median of 6 per participant), with one-third resolved at follow-up. Simplification was possible for 14 participants (56%) and implemented for 7 (50%) at follow-up. No significant changes in other secondary outcomes were observed. CONCLUSION: The intervention was delivered as planned, and valued by stakeholders. Recruitment barriers should be addressed before wider implementation.

Evaluation of the completeness of information sources used to prepare the best possible medication histories at a tertiary teaching hospital in Jordan.

OBJECTIVES: In this study we aimed to evaluate the completeness of three different medication information sources that are commonly used to collect and obtain the Best Possible Medication History (BPMH). METHODS: This is an observational study which was held at Jordan University Hospital. After identifying eligible patients, the BPMH was obtained from three different sources separately. These sources include medical file, pharmacy database, and patients' interview. Information from all of these sources was compiled to create the BPMH. The BPMH was used as the standard against which every other information source was compared and given a "completeness score" according to a systematic scoring system. RESULTS: Among the 196 participating patients who were included in the study, 113 (57.7%) were recruited from internal medicine and 83 (42.3%) from surgical department. Patients' interview showed the highest median completeness score (71.4%) among the three used sources followed by pharmacy database (35.3%), and medical files (28.2%). The median completeness score for the compiled BPMH obtained by the pharmacist was 93.0%. The compiled BPMH completeness score was inversely proportional to the numbers of medications in the compiled BPMH (R = -.392, P value < .001). Moreover, patients with lower income showed better median BPMH completeness score compared with those with higher income (95.2% (IQR = 16.7%) vs 88.9% (IQR = 15.7%), respectively, P value = .042). CONCLUSION: The results show that pharmacist's interview with the patients scored the highest percentage of completeness compared with hospital pharmacy database and medical file and is, therefore, considered more comprehensive in obtaining the BPMH.

Tele-transitions of care (TTOC): a 12-month, randomized controlled trial evaluating the use of Telehealth to achieve triple aim objectives.

BACKGROUND: Poor transitions of care leads to increased health costs, over-utilization of emergency room departments, increased re-hospitalizations and causes poor patient experiences and outcomes. This study evaluated Telehealth feasibility in improving transitions of care. METHODS: This is a 12-month randomized controlled trial, evaluating the use of telehealth (remote patient monitoring and video visits) versus standard transitions of care with the primary outcomes of hospital readmission and emergency department utilization and secondary outcomes of access to care, medication management and adherence and patient engagement. Electronic Medical Record data, Health Information Exchange data and phone survey data was collected. Multi-variable logistic regression models were created to evaluate the effect of Telehealth on hospital readmission, emergency department utilization, medication adherence. Chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare the percentages of categorical variables between the Telehealth and control groups. T tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compared means and medians between the two randomized groups. RESULTS: The study conducted between June 2017 and 2018, included 102 patients. Compared with the standard of care, Telehealth patients were more likely to have medicine reconciliation (p = 0.013) and were 7 times more likely to adhere to medication than the control group (p = 0.03). Telehealth patients exhibited enthusiasm (p = 0.0001), and confidence that Telehealth could improve their healthcare (p = 0.0001). Telehealth showed no statistical significance on emergency department utilization (p = 0.691) nor for readmissions (p = 0.31). 100% of Telehealth patients found the intervention to be valuable, 98% if given the opportunity, reported they would continue using telehealth to manage their healthcare needs, and 94% reported that the remote patient monitoring technology was useful. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth can improve transitions of care after hospital discharge improving patient engagement and adherence to medications. Although this study was unable to show the effect of Telehealth on reduced healthcare utilization, more research needs to be done in order to understand the true impact of Telehealth on preventing avoidable hospital readmission and emergency department visits. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov ID: NCT03528850 Date Registered (Retrospective): 5/18/2018. Status: Completed. IRB #: 970227.

Medication Discrepancies in Older Veterans Receiving Home Healthcare.

In a prospective cohort study of Veterans and community health nurses, we enrolled hospitalized older Veterans referred to home care for skilled nursing and/or physical or occupational therapy for posthospitalization care. We assessed preadmission activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living, health literacy, numeracy, and cognition. Postdischarge phone calls identified medication errors and medication reconciliation efforts by home healthcare clinicians. Veterans Administration-based community health nurses completed surveys about content and timing of postdischarge interactions with home healthcare clinicians. We determined the types and frequency of medication errors among older Veterans receiving home healthcare, patient-provider communication patterns in this setting, and patient characteristics affecting medication error rates. Most Veterans (24/30, 80%) had at least one discordant medication, and only one noted that errors were identified and resolved. Veterans were asked about medications in the home healthcare setting, but far fewer were questioned about medication-taking details, adherence, and as-needed or nonoral medications. Higher numeracy was associated with fewer errors. Veterans Administration community health nurses reported contact by home healthcare clinicians in 41% of cases (7/17). Given the high rate of medication errors discovered, future work should focus on implementing best practices for medication review in this setting, as well as documenting barriers/facilitators of patient-provider communication.

Brown Bag Medication Review: Using AHRQ's Brown Bag Medication Tool.

BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence has been linked to health literacy and poor patient outcomes. The Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit addresses both issues. PURPOSE: A brown bag medication review was implemented to identify medication nonadherence in a Midwestern clinic. METHODS: Adult patients were instructed to bring all prescribed and over-the-counter medication to office visits. A reviewer transcribed administration directions and the patient's verbal instruction of how the medication is taken. RESULTS: The study found 58% (n = 28) of 48 participants were nonadherent for at least 1 medication; 26% (n = 72) of all medications were nonadherent; and mental health drugs were the highest nonadherence category at 38% (n = 11). The majority of medication nonadherence was due to lack of access. CONCLUSIONS: This drug utilization review was found helpful in identification of causes for medication nonadherence, assisting prescribers, and improving patient education.

Impact of Pharmacist Involvement in Heart Failure Transition of Care.

Background: Heart failure (HF) transition of care (TOC) programs may improve continuity of care and coordination and decrease hospital readmissions. Objective: This study evaluated the impact of pharmacy-led HF TOC on HF readmission rate. Methods: This was a single-center, pre-post quasi-experimental study. Pharmacy TOC comprised admission and discharge medication reconciliations and patient education. Patients were included if they had a primary HF diagnosis. Patients were excluded if they were admitted for a non-HF diagnosis, admitted for <24 hours, had a stage IV cancer or dementia diagnosis, or were transferred to hospice care. The primary outcome was HF 30-day readmission rate. Results: A total of 663 patients were included in the study: 330 in the control group and 333 in the intervention group. The average age for both groups was 67 ± 16 years; 48.1% were female; 56.9% were African American; and 51.4% of patients had an ejection fraction ≤40%. In the control group, 57 (17.3%) patients had a HF 30-day readmission compared with 35 (10.5%) patients in the intervention group. After adjusting for age, the intervention group continued to show a difference in readmission (odds ratio = 0.578; 95% CI = 0.367-0.911; P = 0.018). The most common interventions were medication addition (11%), dose titration (7.5%), medication discontinuation (6.6%), and duplication avoidance (2.7%). Conclusion and Relevance: Pharmacy-led HF TOC, as a component of a targeted hospital-based initiative, significantly decreased HF 30-day readmission rate. Results from this study warrant further research to explore which interventions in TOC are most effective.

Community pharmacy medication review, death and re-admission after hospital discharge: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In-hospital medication review has been linked to improved outcomes after discharge, yet there is little evidence to support the use of community pharmacy-based interventions as part of transitional care. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether receipt of a postdischarge community pharmacy-based medication reconciliation and adherence review is associated with a reduced risk of death or re-admission. DESIGN: Propensity score-matched cohort study. SETTING: Ontario, Canada PARTICIPANTS: Patients over age 66 years discharged home from an acute care hospital from 1 April 2007 to 16 September 2016. EXPOSURE: MedsCheck, a publicly funded medication reconciliation and adherence review provided by community pharmacists. MAIN OUTCOME: The primary outcome was time to death or re-admission (defined as an emergency department visit or urgent rehospitalisation) up to 30 days. Secondary outcomes were the 30-day count of outpatient physician visits and time to adverse drug event. RESULTS: MedsCheck recipients had a lower risk of 30-day death or re-admission (23.4% vs 23.9%, HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.00, p=0.02), driven by a decreased risk of death (1.7% vs 2.1%, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.86) and rehospitalisation (11.0% vs 11.4%, HR 0.96, 95% 0.93-0.99). In a post hoc sensitivity analysis with pharmacy random effects added to the propensity score model, these results were substantially attenuated. There was no significant difference in 30-day return to the emergency department (22.5% vs 22.8%, HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.01) or adverse drug events (1.5% vs 1.5%, HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.12). MedsCheck recipients had more outpatient visits (mean 2.11 vs 2.09, RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.02, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among older adults, receipt of a community pharmacy-based medication reconciliation and adherence review was associated with a small reduced risk of short-term death or re-admission. Due to the possibility of unmeasured confounding, experimental studies are needed to clarify the relationship between postdischarge community pharmacy-based medication review and patient outcomes.

Description of a transitions of care and telemedicine simulation lab activity.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Transitions of Care (ToC) is an important clinical practice area requiring trained health care professionals, but there is limited literature describing ToC in the didactic curriculum. The purpose of this study was to describe and evaluate a ToC telemedicine simulation activity in a doctor of pharmacy curriculum. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: A one-hour lecture and simulation activity was incorporated into a second-year course. Student teams participated in discharge and telemedicine encounters with standardized patients (SPs). Six medication-related problems (MRPs) were incorporated into the activity. Activity documents were collected to identify student competency. FINDINGS: Fifty-nine student pharmacists in 16 teams participated. All teams accurately identified five of the six MRPs. Fourteen teams (87.5%) accurately identified the sixth MRP after completion of the telemedicine encounter. Six teams (62.5%) completed the discharge medication list accurately and completely. All teams provided medication education, and 93.8% (n = 15) of teams identified follow-up was needed. Ten teams utilized effective interview sequence and structure during both encounters. Activity challenges included resources, financial support and SP training. SUMMARY: Case-based learning and the use of simulation has good evidence supporting its use in education. Utilizing these techniques to reinforce concepts may be a beneficial way for students to be trained effectively to deliver impactful ToC services.

Pharmacy students' medication history taking competency: Simulation and feedback learning intervention.

INTRODUCTION: Obtaining accurate patient medication histories and performing medication reconciliation are core pharmacy practice skills that optimize patient safety at transitions of care. Competency-based learning and assessment of medication reconciliation skills are essential methods in undergraduate pharmacy education. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of an in-classroom simulation- and feedback-driven training activity on pharmacy students' medication reconciliation skills, self-perceived confidence, and overall student satisfaction. METHODS: Over a three-day learning activity in 2016, pharmacy students from a private university in Jordan were assessed by roleplay on their ability to conduct a simulated patient medication interview, obtain the Best Possible Medication History, reconcile the history against a hospital medication chart, identify discrepancies, and document findings. Students received immediate feedback and observed peers undergo the assessment process. Pre- and post-simulation questionnaires and supplementary focus groups enabled collection of quantitative and qualitative data pertaining to student self-perceived confidence, perceptions, experiences, and usefulness of the course. RESULTS: Assessment-based competency scores demonstrated significant improvement in student performance during the activity. Self-perceived confidence scores significantly improved after the medication reconciliation training intervention. Focus group content analysis yielded positive responses such as students valuing receiving feedback on performance and recommendations for future training. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation with feedback was a useful tool to teach pharmacy students medication reconciliation in Jordan. Subsequent to the study, medication reconciliation and interactive teaching methods were added to curriculum to supplement traditional teaching modalities.

Impact of discharge medication bedside delivery service on hospital reutilization.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of a medication to bedside delivery (meds-to-beds) service on hospital reutilization in an adult population. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study was conducted within a regional academic medical center from January 2017 to July 2017. Adult patients discharged from an internal medicine unit with at least one maintenance medication were evaluated. The primary outcome was the incidence of 30-day hospital reutilization between two groups: discharged patients who received meds-to-beds versus those who did not. Additionally, the incidence of 30-day hospital reutilization between the two groups was compared within predefined subgroup patient populations: polypharmacy, high-risk medication use, and patients with a principal discharge diagnosis meeting the criteria set by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 30-day risk standardized readmission measures. RESULTS: A total of 600 patients were included in the study (300 patients in the meds-to-beds group and 300 patients in the control group). The 30-day hospital reutilization (emergency department visits and/or hospital readmissions) related to the index visit was lower in the meds-to-beds group, but the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups (8.0% in the meds-to-beds group versus 10.0% in the control group; odds ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-1.37). There was no significant difference in the 30-day hospital reutilization related to the index visit between the control and meds-to-beds groups within the three subgroups analyzed. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in 30-day hospital reutilization related to the index visit with the implementation of meds-to-beds service in the absence of other transitions-of-care interventions.