The Photon-Counting CT Enters the Field of Cochlear Implantation: Comparison to Angiography DynaCT and Conventional Multislice CT.

INTRODUCTION: Cochlear duct length (CDL) measurement plays a role in the context of individualized cochlear implant (CI) surgery regarding an individualized selection and implantation of the CI electrode carrier and an efficient postoperative anatomy-based fitting process. The level of detail of the preoperative temporal bone CT scan depends on the imaging modality with major impact on CDL measurements and CI electrode contact position determination. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of perioperative CDL measurements and electrode contact determination in photon-counting CT (PCCT). METHODS: Ten human fresh-frozen petrous bone specimens were examined with a first-generation PCCT. A clinically applicable radiation dose of 27.1 mGy was used. Scans were acquired before and after CI insertion. Postoperative measurement of the CDL was conducted using an otological planning software and 3D-curved multiplanar reconstruction. Investigation of electrode contact position was performed by two respective observers. Measurements were compared with a conventional multislice CT and to a high-resolution flat-panel volume CT with secondary reconstructions. RESULTS: Pre- and postoperative CDL measurements in PCCT images showed no significant difference to high-resolution flat-panel volume CT. Postoperative CI electrode contact determination was also as precise as the flat-panel CT-based assessment. PCCT and flat-panel volume CT were equivalent concerning interobserver variability. CONCLUSION: CDL measurement with PCCT was equivalent to flat-panel volume CT with secondary reconstructions. PCCT enabled highly precise postoperative CI electrode contact determination with substantial advantages over conventional multislice CT scanners.

Comprehension of Cochlear Duct Length for Incomplete Partition Types.

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative assessment of the cochlear duct length (CDL) and cochlear dimensions allows the selection of optimized implants. We aimed to evaluate the CDL measurements in incomplete partition (IP) defect patients and to create a reference to the literature. METHODS: Forty-one patients with IP (13 IP I, 23 IP II, and 5 IP III) and 30 controls were included in the study. The standardized cochlear image showing the basal turn in the most expansive plane was reconstructed from temporal high-resolution computed tomography images. Cochlear duct length measured manually (CDL-M) was measured by points placed consecutively on the lateral wall of the cochlea. The defined equations for estimating CDL (CDL measured according to Schurzig et al formula [CDL-Ɵ], CDL measured according to Escudé et al formula [CDL-E], CDL measured according to Alexiades et al formula [CDL-A]) were calculated from the same images. Cochlear duct length mean values obtained by each method were compared for each IP type. RESULTS: The longest CDL value was found in the control group, irrespective of the calculation method. Incomplete partition II cases had the most extended mean CDL among IP types. Incomplete partition III had the shortest CDL among all groups' CDL-M values. However, the mean CDL-M values of IP types I and III showed close results. There was no significant difference between the CDL-E and CDL-M values of the control group. Similarly, no significant difference was found between CDL-Ɵ and CDL-M values in IP type III cases. However, the results of other estimating formulations of all groups differed significantly from CDL-M values. CONCLUSION: Cochlear duct length differences were detected between the control group and IP subtypes. These differences should be considered when choosing the appropriate electrode length. Because the results of formulas estimating CDL may differ from CDL-M in both control and IP cases, it would be more appropriate to use manual measurements in clinical practice.

Fully Automated Measurement of Cochlear Duct Length From Clinical Temporal Bone Computed Tomography.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To present and validate a novel fully automated method to measure cochlear dimensions, including cochlear duct length (CDL). STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: The computational method combined 1) a deep learning (DL) algorithm to segment the cochlea and otic capsule and 2) geometric analysis to measure anti-modiolar distances from the round window to the apex. The algorithm was trained using 165 manually segmented clinical computed tomography (CT). A Testing group of 159 CTs were then measured for cochlear diameter and width (A- and B-values) and CDL using the automated system and compared against manual measurements. The results were also compared with existing approaches and historical data. In addition, pre- and post-implantation scans from 27 cochlear implant recipients were studied to compare predicted versus actual array insertion depth. RESULTS: Measurements were successfully obtained in 98.1% of scans. The mean CDL to 900° was 35.52 mm (SD, 2.06; range, [30.91-40.50]), the mean A-value was 8.88 mm (0.47; [7.67-10.49]), and mean B-value was 6.38 mm (0.42; [5.16-7.38]). The R2 fit of the automated to manual measurements was 0.87 for A-value, 0.70 for B-value, and 0.71 for CDL. For anti-modiolar arrays, the distance between the imaged and predicted array tip location was 0.57 mm (1.25; [0.13-5.28]). CONCLUSION: Our method provides a fully automated means of cochlear analysis from clinical CTs. The distribution of CDL, dimensions, and cochlear quadrant lengths is similar to those from historical data. This approach requires no radiographic experience and is free from user-related variation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:449-458, 2022.

Direct measurement of cochlear parameters for automatic calculation of the cochlear duct length.

BACKGROUND: Cochlear morphology and cochlear duct length (CDL) play important roles in the selection of appropriate electrodes. Cochlear parameters such as diameter (A value) and width (B value) are used as inputs for calculating the CDL. Current measurements of these parameters are inefficient and time consuming. Recently developed otological planning software (OTOPLAN) allows surgeons to directly measure these parameters and then automatically calculate the CDL. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to validate this new software for measuring the cochlear parameters and CDL. The secondary aim was to investigate the correlation between each cochlear parameter with the calculated CDL. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTINGS: Ear specialist hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The measurement of cochlear diameter (A value) was chosen as the validation parameter. To do this, the A value was measured by a neurotologist on the new OTOPLAN planning software and was validated to the one measured on the currently used DICOM viewer. Upon the validation of the OTOPLAN software, the other two cochlear parameters, namely width (B value) and height (H value) were measured, and CDL was automatically calculated. Finally, the correlation of all parameters with the CDL was statistically analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Validation of OTOPLAN and CDL estimation. SAMPLE SIZE: 88 ears. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the A-value measured on the DICOM viewing software and that on the new planning software by the two independent neurotologists (P=.27). Both A-and B-values showed a high positive correlation to the CDL. However, the B-value showed a stronger correlation to the CDL than the A-value (r=0.63 for A, and r=0.96 for B). CONCLUSION: The direct measurement of cochlea parameters and automatic calculation of the CDL could improve the efficiency of clinical workflow and make otology surgeons more independent. Moreover, the cochlear width (B) has a strong correlation to the CDL. Thus, we suggest using the combination of A and B to accurately estimate the CDL rather than using only one. LIMITATIONS: Single center and small sample size. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None. No relationship with manufacturers.

Characterization of the human helicotrema: implications for cochlear duct length and frequency mapping.

BACKGROUND: Despite significant anatomical variation amongst patients, cochlear implant frequency-mapping has traditionally followed a patient-independent approach. Basilar membrane (BM) length is required for patient-specific frequency-mapping, however cochlear duct length (CDL) measurements generally extend to the apical tip of the entire cochlea or have no clearly defined end-point. By characterizing the length between the end of the BM and the apical tip of the entire cochlea (helicotrema length), current CDL models can be corrected to obtain the appropriate BM length. Synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging has made this analysis possible due to the soft-tissue contrast through the entire cochlear apex. METHODS: Helicotrema linear length and helicotrema angular length measurements were performed on synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging data of 14 cadaveric human cochleae. On a sub-set of six samples, the CDL to the apical tip of the entire cochlea (CDLTIP) and the BM length (CDLBM) were determined. Regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between CDLTIP and CDLBM. RESULTS: The mean helicotrema linear length and helicotrema angular length values were 1.6 ± 0.9 mm and 67.8 ± 37.9 degrees, respectively. Regression analysis revealed the following relationship between CDLTIP and CDLBM: CDLBM = 0.88(CDLTIP) + 3.71 (R2 = 0.995). CONCLUSION: This is the first known study to characterize the length of the helicotrema in the context of CDL measurements. It was determined that the distance between the end of the BM and the tip of the entire cochlea is clinically consequential. A relationship was determined that can predict the BM length of an individual patient based on their respective CDL measured to the apical tip of the cochlea.

Evaluation of Cochlear Duct Length Measurements From a 3D Analytical Cochlear Model Using Synchrotron Radiation Phase-Contrast Imaging.

HYPOTHESIS: Evaluating the accuracy of cochlear duct length (CDL) measurements from a published three-dimensional (3D) analytical cochlear model using Synchrotron Radiation Phase-Contrast Imaging (SR-PCI) data will help determine its clinical applicability and allow for model adjustments to increase accuracy. BACKGROUND: Accurate CDL determination can aid in cochlear implant sizing for full coverage and frequency map programming, which has the potential to improve hearing outcomes in patients. To overcome problems with the currently available techniques for CDL determination, a novel 3D analytical cochlear model, dependent on four basal turn distances, was proposed in the literature. METHODS: SR-PCI data from 11 cadaveric human cochleae were used to obtain reference measurements. CDL values generated by the analytical cochlear model were evaluated in two conditions: when the number of cochlear turns (NCT) were automatically predicted based on the four input distances, and when the NCT were manually specified based on SR-PCI data. RESULTS: When the analytical cochlear model automatically predicted the NCT, the mean absolute error was 2.6 ±â€Š1.6 mm, with only 27% (3/11) of the samples having an error in the clinically acceptable range of ±1.5 mm. When the NCT were manually specified based on SR-PCI data, the mean absolute error was reduced to 1.0 ±â€Š0.6 mm, with 73% (8/11) of the samples having a clinically acceptable error. CONCLUSION: The 3D analytical cochlear model introduced in the literature is effective at modeling the 3D geometry of individual cochleae, however tuning in the NCT estimation is required.

CT-scan contouring technique allows for direct and reliable measurements of the cochlear duct length: implication in cochlear implantation with straight electrode-arrays.

OBJECTIVES: The advent of hybrid electro-acoustic implants requires precise positioning of the electrode-array (EA) within the cochlea. The cochlea size, that is, the length of the cochlear scala tympani, is often indirectly estimated from distance A by Escudé's method. This technique has been confirmed by anatomical studies, in a bunch of cadaveric specimens, but it is not yet widely established in the field of computed tomography (CT). We compared cochlear duct length obtained by Escudé's method to those directly acquired on CT images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The lengths of cochlear scala tympani were directly measured on CT scans by contouring the external cochlear wall (contouring technique-CoT). In fifteen patients implanted with a straight EA, the length of the EA and the measured length of the cochlea by the CoT were compared, to check the reliability of the CoT. Then, in 200 CT-scans, the length of the cochlear duct was measured by the CoT then compared to Escudé's method. RESULTS: In the 200 CT-scans which served for cochlear length measurements, a significant variability between the cochleae were observed, as expected. At 360°, the correlation between the measurements of the length of the cochlear scala tympani between the two techniques differed, with a difference of 0.2 ± 0.7 mm at 360° (extreme: 2 mm; p < 0.001) and 2.2 ± 1.2 mm at 540° (extreme: 5.6 mm; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The CoT can predict with accuracy the length of EA-insertion depth, more precisely than estimation methods such as Escudé's.

Use of MRI to determine cochlear duct length in patients undergoing cochlear implantation.

OBJECTIVES: It is recognised that CT can be used to determine the cochlear duct length (CDL) when selecting an electrode for cochlear implantation. It is the practice of our institution to routinely use MRI as the sole modality of pre-operative imaging in the assessment of children referred for consideration of cochlear implantation. We therefore wanted to determine whether MRI could be reliably used to determine cochlear duct length. METHODS: An analysis of 40 ears that had undergone MRI and CT of the temporal bones was undertaken. The diameter of the basal turn was independently measured for each ear using the two modalities, and CDL was then calculated. RESULTS: The mean error of measurement was 0.26 mm (range 0-0.8 mm), leading to a difference in calculated CDL of 0.96 mm (range 0-2.92 mm). CDL did not predict full insertion of 28 mm cochlear implant electrodes in 30 ears. CONCLUSIONS: MRI can be used to reliably determine cochlear duct length.

Selection of the appropriate cochlear electrode array using a specifically developed research software application.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness and reliability of a research software application for the estimation of an individual's cochlear duct length as a basis for electrode selection. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 21 consecutive patients (23 ears) implanted with a cochlear electrode were investigated. The study comprised 19 children (2 bilateral) and 2 adults. RESULTS: The measured 'A' distances (the largest distance from the round window to the contralateral wall) corresponded to cochlear duct lengths of 28.5-36.4 mm. The mean cochlear duct length was 34.05 ± 1.72 mm (33.60 ± 2.27 mm in females and 34.35 ± 1.27 mm in males). Full insertion was achieved in all but two cases. No misplaced electrode array or electrode fold-over was detected. In all but three ears, the electrode was chosen based on the research software application's indication. CONCLUSION: The results show a good correlation between the pre-operatively predicted insertion depths using the software application and those post-operatively measured using X-ray. The insertion length predicted by the software was always longer than that measured via X-ray.

Comparison of cochlear duct length between the Saudi and non-Saudi populations.

BACKGROUND: There are no data on cochlear duct lengths (CDL) among Middle East populations. OBJECTIVES: The main aims of this study were to estimate the average CDL in the Saudi population and to compare it with the reported CDL in other regions/ethnic groups outside the Middle East. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary otolaryngology head and neck surgery center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Temporal bone CT scans were reviewed to determine CDL. We excluded any CT scan of an ear with a congenital inner ear anomaly or acquired pathology. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CDL. SAMPLE SIZE: 441 temporal bone CT scans. RESULTS: The overall CDL mean was 31.9 mm (range 20.3-37.7 mm). The cochleae of males was significantly longer than of females and cochleae from the left side were significantly longer than of the right side. No significant difference was found between children and adults. Inter-study comparison revealed a significant difference in CDL between the Saudi population in our study and European and Australian studies, but not between the present study and North American studies. CONCLUSIONS: The CDL differed significantly according to side of the cochlea and sex, but not by age. Geographically and ethnically, the mean CDL for Saudis was significantly different from the CDL of subjects of some ethnic backgrounds, but not others. Due to this diversity, we recommend that the CDL be measured before cochlear implant surgery. LIMITATIONS: All the measurements were done by one person, and the subjects' physical measurements, such as height or head circumference, were not included. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

On the accuracy of cochlear duct length measurement in computed tomographic images.

PURPOSE: Patient specific selection of cochlear implants would benefit from pre-operative knowledge of cochlear length. Several methods for its measurement or estimation have been described in literature. This study focused on the achievable accuracy in clinically available imaging. METHODS: Five simplified cochlea models milled into porcine bone were scanned in water using clinical cone beam computed tomography. Due to their well-known dimensions these phantoms served as gold standard for the length measurements. Each phantom was measured ten times using the custom software Comet. In addition, cochleae in ten image datasets taken indiscriminately from clinical routine were measured ten times each to test the precision under realistic conditions. The results were also compared to estimations based on the diameter of the basal turn (A value) as described in literature. RESULTS: Measurement accuracy of the phantoms' lengths was high (average error: - 0.2 mm; standard deviation: 0.3 mm). The pooled standard deviation for the measurements in clinical datasets was 0.6 mm. Errors resulted mainly from problems locating the helicotrema. The estimations differed on average - 1.7 to + 0.4 mm from the manual measurements and had standard deviations between 0.5 and 0.6 mm depending on the algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: The program Comet was successfully used to accurately measure the length of the cochlea models in clinically available imaging. The lower image quality of patient scans reduced the precision of the measurement. Estimations using the A value are a quicker alternative for averagely sized cochleae in cases where the lack of accuracy is tolerable.

Measuring cochlear duct length in Asian population: worth giving a thought!

INTRODUCTION: The anatomy of the cochlea forms the basis for a successful cochlear implantation. Cochlear duct length (CDL) is defined as the length of the scala media as measured from the middle of the round window to helicotrema. Preoperative measurement of CDL is particularly important when precise intracochlear electrode array placement is desired. It can be done both histologically and radiologically. Preoperative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan which forms an integral part of cochlear implant workup is a useful tool to calculate CDL using 3D reconstructions. METHOD: This study was done in SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, India, which is a tertiary care hospital and referral centre for cochlear implants. HRCT temporal bones of all children less than 6 years of age, with congenital bilateral severe-to-profound SNHL who were being worked up for cochlear implant were studied and analysed. 124 patients (56 females and 68 males) with hearing loss were evaluated for cochlear implantation. HRCT temporal bone of these patients was analysed and a variable A was measured which is defined as the linear measurement from the round window to the farthest point on the opposite wall of the cochlea on a reformatted CT scan slice. RESULTS: Mean of distance A for right ear of these patients was 8.10 mm (range 7.7-9.2 mm). Mean for the same in left ear of these patients was 8.14 mm (range 7.7-9.0 mm), giving an overall average of 8.12 mm. Using the formula, CDL = 4.16A-3.98, we calculated the length of cochlear duct. Mean cochlear duct length was 29.8 mm with a range from 28 to 34.3 mm. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first large sample study of cochlear length in population of this part of the world. A smaller cochlear length in this part of the world as compared to the Caucasian cochlear duct is a significant finding in understanding of the cochlear anatomy and physiology. It would also have great implications on the insertion depth in cochlear implantation.

An automated A-value measurement tool for accurate cochlear duct length estimation.

BACKGROUND: There has been renewed interest in the cochlear duct length (CDL) for preoperative cochlear implant electrode selection and postoperative generation of patient-specific frequency maps. The CDL can be estimated by measuring the A-value, which is defined as the length between the round window and the furthest point on the basal turn. Unfortunately, there is significant intra- and inter-observer variability when these measurements are made clinically. The objective of this study was to develop an automated A-value measurement algorithm to improve accuracy and eliminate observer variability. METHOD: Clinical and micro-CT images of 20 cadaveric cochleae specimens were acquired. The micro-CT of one sample was chosen as the atlas, and A-value fiducials were placed onto that image. Image registration (rigid affine and non-rigid B-spline) was applied between the atlas and the 19 remaining clinical CT images. The registration transform was applied to the A-value fiducials, and the A-value was then automatically calculated for each specimen. High resolution micro-CT images of the same 19 specimens were used to measure the gold standard A-values for comparison against the manual and automated methods. RESULTS: The registration algorithm had excellent qualitative overlap between the atlas and target images. The automated method eliminated the observer variability and the systematic underestimation by experts. Manual measurement of the A-value on clinical CT had a mean error of 9.5 ± 4.3% compared to micro-CT, and this improved to an error of 2.7 ± 2.1% using the automated algorithm. Both the automated and manual methods correlated significantly with the gold standard micro-CT A-values (r = 0.70, p < 0.01 and r = 0.69, p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: An automated A-value measurement tool using atlas-based registration methods was successfully developed and validated. The automated method eliminated the observer variability and improved accuracy as compared to manual measurements by experts. This open-source tool has the potential to benefit cochlear implant recipients in the future.

Cochlear volume as a predictive factor for residual-hearing preservation after conventional cochlear implantation.

OBJECTIVE: The preservation of residual hearing after conventional cochlear implantation (CI) is frequently observed when atraumatic soft surgery is adopted. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the predictive factors for residual hearing preservation after atraumatic CI. PATIENTS: This study included 46 patients who underwent CI based on an atraumatic technique using a standard-length flexible electrode implant through a round window approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cochlear volume was measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Cochlear duct length (CDL) was taken as the length of the scala media measured using computed tomography (CT). The association between residual hearing preservation and cochlear volume/CDL was then examined. RESULT: Cochlear volume and CDL were significantly larger in patients with complete hearing preservation than in those with hearing loss. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that cochlear volume was a significant predictive factor for residual hearing preservation. CONCLUSION: Residual hearing preservation after conventional CI was observed in patients with a larger cochlear volume and longer CDL. Cochlear volume could be a predictive factor for residual hearing preservation after conventional CI.

Variations in cochlear duct shape revealed on clinical CT images with an automatic tracing method.

Cochlear size and morphology vary greatly and may influence the course of a cochlear implant electrode array during insertion and its final intra-cochlear position. Detailed insight into these variations is valuable for characterizing each cochlea and offers the opportunity to study possible correlations with surgical or speech perception outcomes. This study presents an automatic tracing method to assess individual cochlear duct shapes from clinical CT images. On pre-operative CT scans of 479 inner ears the cochlear walls were discriminated by interpolating voxel intensities along radial and perpendicular lines within multiplanar reconstructions at 1 degree intervals from the round window. In all 479 cochleas, the outer wall could be traced automatically up to 720 degrees. The inner wall and floor of the scala tympani in 192 cochleas. The shape of the cochlear walls were modelled using a logarithmic spiral function including an offset value. The vertical trajectories of the scala tympani exhibited a non-monotonous spiral slope with specific regions at risk for CI-related insertion trauma, and three slope categories could be distinguished. This presented automatic tracing method allows the detailed description of cochlear morphology and can be used for both individual and large cohort evaluation of cochlear implant patients.

Evaluation of Cochlear Duct Length Computations Using Synchrotron Radiation Phase-Contrast Imaging.

HYPOTHESIS: Evaluation of cochlear duct length (CDL) using novel imaging techniques will help improve the accuracy of existing CDL equations. BACKGROUND: Various relationships relating A value measured from a patient's computed tomography scan and CDL have been proposed to aid in preoperative electrode selection and frequency mapping. METHODS: Ten cadaveric temporal bones were scanned using synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging. Reference CDL values were calculated by placing points representing the organ of Corti (OC), lateral wall (LW), and electrode location (I) on the synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging slices along the length of the cochlea. The CDL estimates from the existing three equations (OC, LW, I) in addition to two newly proposed equations (OC and LW) were compared with reference CDL values at each respective location. RESULTS: When compared with reference CDL values, the new OC equation improved the CDL estimates from a 6.2% error to a 5.1% error while the new LW equation improved the CDL estimate error from 3.9 to 3.6%. Bland-Altman plots revealed both new equations increased similarity to reference values and brought more samples to within clinically significant ranges. Validation of the original electrode location equation to the reference values showed a 4.6% difference. CONCLUSION: The newly proposed equations for LW and OC provided an improvement over past equations for determining CDL from the A value by showing improved agreement with reference values. Therefore, these equations can provide quick and accurate preoperative estimates of CDL for improving customized frequency mapping.

Intra- and Interobserver Variability of Cochlear Length Measurements in Clinical CT.

HYPOTHESIS: The cochlear A-value measurement exhibits significant inter- and intraobserver variability, and its accuracy is dependent on the visualization method in clinical computed tomography (CT) images of the cochlea. BACKGROUND: An accurate estimate of the cochlear duct length (CDL) can be used to determine electrode choice, and frequency map the cochlea based on the Greenwood equation. Studies have described estimating the CDL using a single A-value measurement, however the observer variability has not been assessed. METHODS: Clinical and micro-CT images of 20 cadaveric cochleae were acquired. Four specialists measured A-values on clinical CT images using both standard views and multiplanar reconstructed (MPR) views. Measurements were repeated to assess for intraobserver variability. Observer variabilities were evaluated using intra-class correlation and absolute differences. Accuracy was evaluated by comparison to the gold standard micro-CT images of the same specimens. RESULTS: Interobserver variability was good (average absolute difference: 0.77 ±â€Š0.42 mm) using standard views and fair (average absolute difference: 0.90 ±â€Š0.31 mm) using MPR views. Intraobserver variability had an average absolute difference of 0.31 ±â€Š0.09 mm for the standard views and 0.38 ±â€Š0.17 mm for the MPR views. MPR view measurements were more accurate than standard views, with average relative errors of 9.5 and 14.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was significant observer variability in A-value measurements using both the standard and MPR views. Creating the MPR views increased variability between experts, however MPR views yielded more accurate results. Automated A-value measurement algorithms may help to reduce variability and increase accuracy in the future.

Measuring Cochlear Duct Length - a historical analysis of methods and results.

BACKGROUND: Cochlear Duct Length (CDL) has been an important measure for the development and advancement of cochlear implants. Emerging literature has shown CDL can be used in preoperative settings to select the proper sized electrode and develop customized frequency maps. In order to improve post-operative outcomes, and develop new electrode technologies, methods of measuring CDL must be validated to allow usage in the clinic. PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to assess the various techniques used to calculate CDL and provide the reader with enough information to make an informed decision on how to conduct future studies measuring the CDL. RESULTS: The methods to measure CDL, the modality used to capture images, and the location of the measurement have all changed as technology evolved. With recent popularity and advancement in computed tomography (CT) imaging in place of histologic sections, measurements of CDL have been focused at the lateral wall (LW) instead of the organ of Corti (OC), due to the inability of CT to view intracochlear structures. After analyzing results from methods such as directly measuring CDL from histology, indirectly reconstructing the shape of the cochlea, and determining CDL based on spiral coefficients, it was determined the three dimensional (3D) reconstruction method is the most reliable method to measure CDL. 3D reconstruction provides excellent visualization of the cochlea and avoids errors evident in other methods. Due to the number of varying methods with varying accuracies, certain guidelines must be followed in the future to allow direct comparison of CDL values between studies. CONCLUSION: After summarizing and analyzing the interesting history of CDL measurements, the use of standardized guidelines and the importance of CDL for future cochlear implant developments is emphasized for future studies.

Automatic Cochlear Duct Length Estimation for Selection of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays.

HYPOTHESIS: Cochlear duct length (CDL) can be automatically measured for custom selection of cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays. BACKGROUND: CI electrode array selection can be influenced by measuring the CDL, which is estimated based on the length of the line that connects the round window and the lateral wall of the cochlea when passing through the modiolus. CDL measurement remains time consuming and inter-observer variability has not been studied. METHODS: We evaluate an automatic approach to directly measure the two-turn (2T) CDL using existing algorithms for localizing cochlear anatomy in computed tomography (CT). Pre-op CT images of 309 ears were evaluated. Two fellowship-trained neurotologists manually and independently measured CDL. Inter-observer variability between measurements across expert and automatic observers is assessed. Inter-observer differences for choice of electrode type are also investigated. RESULTS: Manual measurement of CDL by experts tends to underestimate cochlea size and has high inter-observer variability, with mean absolute differences between expert CDL estimations of 1.15 mm. Our results show that this can lead to a large number of cochleae for which a different electrode array type would be selected by different observers, depending on the specific threshold value of CDL used to decide between array type. CONCLUSION: Choosing the best CI electrode array is an important task for optimizing hearing outcomes. Manual cochleae length measurements are user-dependent, and errors impact upon the CI electrode array choice for certain patients. Measuring cochlea length automatically is less time consuming and generates more repeatable results. Our automatic approach could make use of CDL for patient-customized treatment more clinically adoptable.

Method to estimate the complete and two-turn cochlear duct length.

HYPOTHESIS: Using a linear measurement of the cochlea on a single radiographic image can reliably estimate the complete and two-turn cochlear duct length (CDL) in a normal human temporal bone. BACKGROUND: CDL is measured from the middle of the round window to the helicotrema. Histologic studies have shown the length of the organ of Corti (OC) to range from 25 to 35 mm. CDL measurements, performed either radiographically or histologically, are quite tedious and time-consuming. We propose equations that can reliably estimate both two-turn and complete CDL using a single computed tomography (CT) image. METHODS: Prior studies of CDL, measured either histologically or radiographically, were reviewed, which yielded distributions of CDL measured at the OC and the lateral wall of the cochlea. Using Escudé's third equation as a basis, we were able to extrapolate complete and two-turn CDL based on a CT scan measurement of the diameter of the basal turn (A). RESULTS: Using measurement A, the relationship of two-turn CDL measured at the OC is 2TL(oc) = 3.65(A-1) and for 2TL(i) = 3.65(A-0.7). The equation for estimation of complete CDL is CDL(oc) = 4.16A - 4 and for CDL(i) = 4.16A - 2.7. CONCLUSION: Using a single linear measurement from a CT scan image can reliably estimate the two-turn and complete CDLs in human temporal bones. The two-turn length represents the best compromise of cochlear coverage while minimizing intracochlear trauma for electrode insertions.