Metabolomics 2023 workshop report: moving toward consensus on best QA/QC practices in LC-MS-based untargeted metabolomics.

INTRODUCTION: During the Metabolomics 2023 conference, the Metabolomics Quality Assurance and Quality Control Consortium (mQACC) presented a QA/QC workshop for LC-MS-based untargeted metabolomics. OBJECTIVES: The Best Practices Working Group disseminated recent findings from community forums and discussed aspects to include in a living guidance document. METHODS: Presentations focused on reference materials, data quality review, metabolite identification/annotation and quality assurance. RESULTS: Live polling results and follow-up discussions offered a broad international perspective on QA/QC practices. CONCLUSIONS: Community input gathered from this workshop series is being used to shape the living guidance document, a continually evolving QA/QC best practices resource for metabolomics researchers.

Essential components of an effective transition from paediatric to adult neurologist care for adolescents with Duchenne muscular dystrophy; a consensus derived using the Delphi methodology in Eastern Europe, Greece and Israel.

PURPOSE: An increasing number of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) now have access to improved standard of care and disease modifying treatments, which improve the clinical course of DMD and extend life expectancy beyond 30 years of age. A key issue for adolescent DMD patients is the transition from paediatric- to adult-oriented healthcare. Adolescents and adults with DMD have unique but highly complex healthcare needs associated with long-term steroid use, orthopaedic, respiratory, cardiac, psychological, and gastrointestinal problems meaning that a comprehensive transition process is required. A sub-optimal transition into adult care can have disruptive and deleterious consequences for a patient's long-term care. This paper details the results of a consensus amongst clinicians on transitioning adolescent DMD patients from paediatric to adult neurologists that can act as a guide to best practice to ensure patients have continuous comprehensive care at every stage of their journey. METHODS: The consensus was derived using the Delphi methodology. Fifty-three statements were developed by a Steering Group (the authors of this paper) covering seven topics: Define the goals of transition, Preparing the patient, carers/parents and the adult centre, The transition process at the paediatric centre, The multidisciplinary transition summary - Principles, The multidisciplinary transition summary - Content, First visit in the adult centre, Evaluation of transition. The statements were shared with paediatric and adult neurologists across Central Eastern Europe (CEE) as a survey requesting their level of agreement with each statement. RESULTS: Data from 60 responders (54 full responses and six partial responses) were included in the data set analysis. A consensus was agreed across 100% of the statements. CONCLUSIONS: It is hoped that the findings of this survey which sets out agreed best practice statements, and the transfer template documents developed, will be widely used and so facilitate an effective transition from paediatric to adult care for adolescents with DMD.

Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.

PURPOSE: Although comprehensive and widespread guidelines on how to conduct systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) exist, for example from the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) initiative, key information is often missing in published reports. This article describes the development of an extension of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guideline: PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024. METHODS: The development process followed the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) guidelines and included a literature search, expert consultations, a Delphi study, a hybrid workgroup meeting, pilot testing, and an end-of-project meeting, with integrated patient/public involvement. RESULTS: From the literature and expert consultation, 49 potentially relevant reporting items were identified. Round 1 of the Delphi study was completed by 103 panelists, whereas round 2 and 3 were completed by 78 panelists. After 3 rounds, agreement (≥67%) on inclusion and wording was reached for 44 items. Eleven items without consensus for inclusion and/or wording were discussed at a workgroup meeting attended by 24 participants. Agreement was reached for the inclusion and wording of 10 items, and the deletion of 1 item. Pilot testing with 65 authors of OMI systematic reviews further improved the guideline through minor changes in wording and structure, finalized during the end-of-project meeting. The final checklist to facilitate the reporting of full systematic review reports contains 54 (sub)items addressing the review's title, abstract, plain language summary, open science, introduction, methods, results, and discussion. Thirteen items pertaining to the title and abstract are also included in a separate abstract checklist, guiding authors in reporting for example conference abstracts. CONCLUSION: PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 consists of two checklists (full reports; abstracts), their corresponding explanation and elaboration documents detailing the rationale and examples for each item, and a data flow diagram. PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 can improve the reporting of systematic reviews of OMIs, fostering their reproducibility and allowing end-users to appraise the quality of OMIs and select the most appropriate OMI for a specific application. NOTE: In order to encourage its wide dissemination this article is freely accessible on the web sites of the journals: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes; Journal of Clinical Epidemiology; Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes; Quality of Life Research.

Blockchain technology and raft consensus for secure physician prescriptions and improved diagnoses in electronic healthcare systems.

With electronic healthcare systems undergoing rapid change, optimizing the crucial process of recording physician prescriptions is a task with major implications for patient care. The power of blockchain technology and the precision of the Raft consensus algorithm are combined in this article to create a revolutionary solution for this problem. In addition to addressing these issues, the proposed framework, by focusing on the challenges associated with physician prescriptions, is a breakthrough in a new era of security and dependability for the healthcare sector. The Raft algorithm is a cornerstone that improves the diagnostic decision-making process, increases confidence in patients, and sets a new standard for robust healthcare systems. In the proposed consensus algorithm, a weighted sum of two influencing factors including the physician acceptability and inter-physicians' reliability is used for selecting the participating physicians. An investigation is conducted to see how well the Raft algorithm performs in overcoming prescription-related roadblocks that support a compelling argument for improved patient care. Apart from its technological benefits, the proposed approach seeks to revolutionize the healthcare system by fostering trust between patients and providers. Raft's ability to communicate presents the proposed solution as an effective way to deal with healthcare issues and ensure security.

Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.

PURPOSE: Although comprehensive and widespread guidelines on how to conduct systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) exist, for example from the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) initiative, key information is often missing in published reports. This article describes the development of an extension of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guideline: PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024. METHODS: The development process followed the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) guidelines and included a literature search, expert consultations, a Delphi study, a hybrid workgroup meeting, pilot testing, and an end-of-project meeting, with integrated patient/public involvement. RESULTS: From the literature and expert consultation, 49 potentially relevant reporting items were identified. Round 1 of the Delphi study was completed by 103 panelists, whereas round 2 and 3 were completed by 78 panelists. After 3 rounds, agreement (≥ 67%) on inclusion and wording was reached for 44 items. Eleven items without consensus for inclusion and/or wording were discussed at a workgroup meeting attended by 24 participants. Agreement was reached for the inclusion and wording of 10 items, and the deletion of 1 item. Pilot testing with 65 authors of OMI systematic reviews further improved the guideline through minor changes in wording and structure, finalized during the end-of-project meeting. The final checklist to facilitate the reporting of full systematic review reports contains 54 (sub)items addressing the review's title, abstract, plain language summary, open science, introduction, methods, results, and discussion. Thirteen items pertaining to the title and abstract are also included in a separate abstract checklist, guiding authors in reporting for example conference abstracts. CONCLUSION: PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 consists of two checklists (full reports; abstracts), their corresponding explanation and elaboration documents detailing the rationale and examples for each item, and a data flow diagram. PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 can improve the reporting of systematic reviews of OMIs, fostering their reproducibility and allowing end-users to appraise the quality of OMIs and select the most appropriate OMI for a specific application. NOTE: In order to encourage its wide dissemination this article is freely accessible on the web sites of the journals: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes; Journal of Clinical Epidemiology; Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes; Quality of Life Research.

Mature B, T and NK-cell, plasma cell and histiocytic/dendritic cell neoplasms: classification according to the World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification.

In 2022, two updated classification systems for lymphoid neoplasms were published by the World Health Organization (WHO Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours, 5th edition, referred to hereafter as WHO-HAEM5) and the International Consensus Conference (ICC) (Alaggio et al. in Leukemia 36(7):1720-1748, 2022; Campo et al. in Blood 140(11):1229-1253, 2022). Both classifications were conceived by both pathologists and clinicians with expertise in the field. The reasons for this have been reviewed previously (Arber et al. in Virchows Arch 482(1):1-9, 2023; Cree in Leukemia 36(7):1701-1702, 2022, Leukemia 36(11):2750, 2022). Given that both groups were using data-driven processes and consensus and used the revised 4th edition of the WHO Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours (WHO-HAEM4R) as a starting point, it is not entirely surprising that the resulting classifications are quite similar. However, they are not identical and reflect preferences or approaches for certain unsettled areas as well as preferred terminology. In this review, we will compare nomenclature of the WHO-HAEM5 and ICC classifications, focusing on lymphoid neoplasms and lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs).

[Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].

The prevalence of pulmonary aspergillosis is increasing in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and can manifest in different forms such as invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). With the variations of individual conditions such as immune status, these forms of the disease may transform into each other or even overlap. Moreover, the atypical clinical manifestations and the limited use of invasive sampling techniques have posed a challenge to the diagnosis and treatment of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with COPD. To provide recommendations for the management of pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with COPD and to construct a clinical workflow, the consensus panel reviewed the evidence and critically appraised the existing studies. As the majority of the recommendations were supported by low levels of evidence, the evidence levels were not listed in the consensus and the strong and weak recommendations were expressed as "recommend" and "suggest", respectively.Recommendations for COPD with IPA: The Panel recommends that high-resolution chest computed tomography (HRCT) be performed in patients suspected with IPA. If IPA cannot be excluded by CT scanning, mycological examination of sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) is recommended. Bronchoscopy and BALF Aspergillus-related examination are recommended in COPD patients with respiratory symptoms such as dyspnea despite the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and systemic glucocorticoids and pulmonary infiltrates observed on chest CT. If the diagnosis is in doubt in patients with probable IPA, histopathological examination is recommended. In COPD patients with an acute infection of more than 10 days' duration, the Panel recommended the detection of Aspergillus-specific IgG antibodies in peripheral blood to aid in the diagnosis of IPA, especially in those who cannot obtain BALF. It is not recommended to initiate antifungal therapy based on clinical symptoms such as cough, fever, and dyspnea empirically in COPD patients. In critically ill patients (such as those admitted to ICU and those with respiratory failure) who are unresponsive to broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment and have imaging findings consistent with IPA, patients with HRCT or bronchoscopy findings consistent with airway invasive aspergillosis, patients with a history of oral or intravenous glucocorticoid use in the past 3 months, or patients with a history of airway Aspergillus infection or colonization, empirical antifungal therapy may be initiated after a comprehensive evaluation of Aspergillus infection risk, and at the same time, pathogen examination should be started as early as possible. Voriconazole, isavuconazole, and posaconazole are recommended as the first-line treatments for COPD with IPA. Echinocandins and amphotericin B may be used as alternative options. Antifungal treatment for COPD with IPA should be continued for at least 6-12 weeks. The duration of antifungal therapy should be determined based on clinical symptoms, pulmonary imaging, and microbiological test results. Significant lesion absorption and stabilization, as well as the elimination of related risk factors, are important references for discontinuation of treatment.Recommendations on COPD with CPA: Chest CT scan and dynamic observation are recommended for COPD with suspected CPA. Peripheral blood Aspergillus-specific IgG antibody testing is recommended in COPD patients with suspected CPA. For those who are difficult to diagnose by routine methods or need further differential diagnosis, pulmonary tissue histopathological examination is recommended. Oral itraconazole solution or voriconazole tablets are recommended as the first-line treatment options for COPD with CPA. Oral isavuconazole capsules or enteric-coated posaconazole tablets can be used as an alternative. Intravenous administration of echinocandins or amphotericin B (deoxycholate or lipid formulations) are suggested as a second-line treatment options in cases of triazole treatment failure, resistance, or intolerance. Antifungal treatment for COPD with CPA should be continued for at least 6 months, and for patients with CCPA for at least 9 months. In those with cavities communicating with the bronchial lumen, if systemic antifungal therapy is ineffective or cannot be tolerated due to adverse reactions, and surgery is also not feasible, the Panel suggests considering nebulized inhalation of amphotericin B and intracavitary injection of amphotericin B or azoles (voriconazole, itraconazole) to control recurrent hemoptysis.Recommendations on COPD with Aspergillus sensitization: When COPD patients present with refractory wheezing and/or rapid decline in lung function, it is recommended that an assessment for Aspergillus sensitization be performed, including Aspergillus-specific IgE, skin Aspergillus antigen test, Aspergillus-specific IgG, total IgE, blood eosinophil count, and sputum examination. The Panel recommends that antifungal therapy should not be routinely initiated in COPD patients with Aspergillus sensitization. For those who meet the diagnostic criteria for ABPA, antifungal therapy is suggested. The most commonly used medication is oral itraconazole solution, but other azoles such as voriconazole, isavuconazole and posaconazole enteric-coated tablets can also be chosen. The general course of antifungal therapy is 3-6 months.Recommendations on the use of glucocorticoids in COPD with pulmonary aspergillosis: In exacerbating COPD patients with secondary IPA or subacute invasive aspergillosis, the Panel suggests that the use of glucocorticoids should be controlled. For COPD patients with concomitant CPA who experience exacerbations with predominantly wheezing, it is suggested that short-term, low-dose glucocorticoids be considered on the basis of antifungal treatment to control symptoms. Glucocorticoid use for COPD exacerbations is suggested to be guided by peripheral blood eosinophil count. It is recommended to avoid systemic glucocorticoids and long-term or high-dose inhaled glucocorticoids (ICS) in stable COPD patients with concomitant CPA. In patients with concomitant Aspergillus sensitization and persistent wheezing despite standardized COPD treatment or patients with ABPA, the Panel recommends systemic glucocorticoids in combination with antifungal therapy and consideration of the use of ICS to reduce the dose of systemic glucocorticoids. Close monitoring for progression to IPA or subacute invasive aspergillosis is essential during treatment.

[Expert consensus on the operating procedures for pulmonary angiography].

Pulmonary angiography is an important invasive diagnostic technique for pulmonary vascular diseases. With the development of pulmonary vascular interventions, pulmonary angiography has been applied more frequently. We focused on the history of pulmonary angiography, anatomy of pulmonary artery, the indications and contraindications of pulmonary angiography, preoperative preparation, operating procedures, the interpretation of pulmonary angiography results and the prevention and management of complications, with the aim of standardizing the operating procedures of pulmonary angiography and improving the diagnosis of pulmonary vascular diseases.Recommendation 1:Given the complexity of pulmonary artery anatomy, pulmonary angiography should be performed in a variety of positions to clearly visualise the morphology of pulmonary artery lesions.Recommendation 2:Pulmonary angiography, as an invasive vascular procedure, should only be performed after the indications have been clearly established, the risks and benefits have been weighed, and informed consent has been obtained.Recommendation 3:Secondary hypertonic or isotonic iodinated contrast agents with iodine concentrations>300 mg/ml are recommended for pulmonary angiography.Recommendation 4:Pulmonary angiography may be performed using the digital subtraction angiography (DSA) mode or cine radiography mode, depending on the patient's cooperation in breath-holding and the needs of the interventional procedure.Recommendation 5:Pulmonary Flow Grade is recommended to depict the blood flow status of pulmonary artery.Recommendation 6:Following pulmonary angiography, the vital signs, oxygenation status and the condition of the puncture site should be closely monitored.

Novel Textbook Outcomes following emergency laparotomy: Delphi exercise.

BACKGROUND: Textbook outcomes are composite outcome measures that reflect the ideal overall experience for patients. There are many of these in the elective surgery literature but no textbook outcomes have been proposed for patients following emergency laparotomy. The aim was to achieve international consensus amongst experts and patients for the best Textbook Outcomes for non-trauma and trauma emergency laparotomy. METHODS: A modified Delphi exercise was undertaken with three planned rounds to achieve consensus regarding the best Textbook Outcomes based on the category, number and importance (Likert scale of 1-5) of individual outcome measures. There were separate questions for non-trauma and trauma. A patient engagement exercise was undertaken after round 2 to inform the final round. RESULTS: A total of 337 participants from 53 countries participated in all three rounds of the exercise. The final Textbook Outcomes were divided into 'early' and 'longer-term'. For non-trauma patients the proposed early Textbook Outcome was 'Discharged from hospital without serious postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade III; including intra-abdominal sepsis, organ failure, unplanned re-operation or death). For trauma patients it was 'Discharged from hospital without unexpected transfusion after haemostasis, and no serious postoperative complications (adapted Clavien-Dindo for trauma ≥ grade III; including intra-abdominal sepsis, organ failure, unplanned re-operation on or death)'. The longer-term Textbook Outcome for both non-trauma and trauma was 'Achieved the early Textbook Outcome, and restoration of baseline quality of life at 1 year'. CONCLUSION: Early and longer-term Textbook Outcomes have been agreed by an international consensus of experts for non-trauma and trauma emergency laparotomy. These now require clinical validation with patient data.

[Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and management of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (2024)].

The general population in China is aging, and thus the number of older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) will continue to increase. Individualized treatment is required to maximize therapeutic potential while minimizing the risk of toxicity. To improve the diagnosis and treatment of DLBCL in older people in China, the Lymphocyte Disease Group of the Hematology Division of the Chinese Medical Association and Lymphoma Expert Commitee of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) have organized relevant experts to formulate this consensus.

[Chinese expert consensus on the technical and clinical practice specifications of artificial intelligence assisted morphology examination of blood cells (2024)].

Blood cell morphological examination is a crucial method for the diagnosis of blood diseases, but traditional manual microscopy is characterized by low efficiency and susceptibility to subjective biases. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has improved the efficiency and quality of blood cell examinations and facilitated the standardization of test results. Currently, a variety of AI devices are either in clinical use or under research, with diverse technical requirements and configurations. The Experimental Diagnostic Study Group of the Hematology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association has organized a panel of experts to formulate this consensus. The consensus covers term definitions, scope of application, technical requirements, clinical application, data management, and information security. It emphasizes the importance of specimen preparation, image acquisition, image segmentation algorithms, and cell feature extraction and classification, and sets forth basic requirements for the cell recognition spectrum. Moreover, it provides detailed explanations regarding the fine classification of pathological cells, requirements for cell training and testing, quality control standards, and assistance in issuing diagnostic reports by humans. Additionally, the consensus underscores the significance of data management and information security to ensure the safety of patient information and the accuracy of data.

[Chinese expert consensus on the application of flow cytometry for the detectin of circulating plasma cells in plasma cell disorders (2024)].

Flow cytometry plays an important role in the diagnosis and treatment of plasma cell diseases, particularly in the detection of circulating plasma cells (CPCs) in the peripheral blood. A consensus about the normalized use of flow cytometry in detection of CPCs in peripheral blood in clinical practice has been achieved. This consensus is founded on evidence-based principles, which elucidates the timing and value of flow cytometry for the detection of CPCs in the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, smoldering myeloma, multiple myeloma, and plasma cell leukemia and standardizes flow cytometry in the detection of CPCs in plasma cell diseases.

[Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of insomnia disorder in primary medical institutions].

Insomnia disorder is the most common sleep disorder. It not only increases the risk of multiple somatic and mental disorders, but also carries a heavy social health economic burden. Currently, there is a lack of diagnosis and treatment standards for insomnia disorder in primary medical institutions at home and abroad. To this end, the Chinese Sleep Research Society organized domestic sleep medical experts in sleep medicine to develop this consensus based on the latest research on insomnia disorder. The current consensus elaborates on the pathophysiological mechanism, epidemiology, diagnosis, screening assessment, prevention and control measures and basic management, and has established a total of 15 recommendations. These recommendations aim to provide comprehensive and standardized references and guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of insomnia disorder.

[Chinese expert consensus on off-label use of Tocilizumab in rheumatic diseases].

The interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway plays a crucial role in various rheumatic diseases. Tocilizumab, a biologic targeting IL-6 receptor, has been widely used in clinical practice, though it's officially approved in China for only three indications. To address clinical challenges associated with the off-label use of tocilizumab in treating rheumatic diseases, the Committee of Chinese Primary Health Care Foundation for Rheumatologists and Immunologists engaged multidisciplinary experts and highlight 12 related clinical issues. We aggregated the drug specifications, the guidelines for clinical management of rheumatic diseases and the evidence from clinical research. Recommendations were formed through voting with the consensus conference method incorporating the Oxford evidence-based medicine criteria to evaluate the strength of evidence and recommendations. We have formulated 10 recommendations for off-label use of tocilizumab related to giant cell arteritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, Takayasu arteritis, systemic sclerosis, adult-onset Still's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis. This consensus aims to provide references for the rational use of tocilizumab in clinical practice and enhance pharmacovigilance monitoring.

European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Consensus Statement on the Use of Non-invasive Biomarkers for Cardiothoracic Transplant Rejection Surveillance.

While allograft rejection (AR) continues to threaten the success of cardiothoracic transplantation, lack of accurate and repeatable surveillance tools to diagnose AR is a major unmet need in the clinical management of cardiothoracic transplant recipients. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and transbronchial biopsy (TBBx) have been the cornerstone of rejection monitoring since the field's incipience, but both suffer from significant limitations, including poor concordance of biopsy interpretation among pathologists. In recent years, novel molecular tools for AR monitoring have emerged and their performance characteristics have been evaluated in multiple studies. An international working group convened by ESOT has reviewed the existing literature and provides a series of recommendations to guide the use of these biomarkers in clinical practice. While acknowledging some caveats, the group recognized that Gene-expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) may be used to rule out rejection in heart transplant recipients, but they are not recommended for cardiac allograft vasculopathy screening. Other traditional biomarkers (NT-proBNP, BNP or troponin) do not have sufficient evidence to support their use to diagnose AR. Regarding lung transplant, dd-cfDNA could be used to rule out clinical rejection and infection, but its use to monitor treatment response is not recommended.

The Development of Principles for Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Preclinical Spinal Cord Research: A Modified Delphi Study.

INTRODUCTION: There is currently limited guidance for researchers on Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) for preclinical spinal cord research, leading to uncertainty about design and implementation. This study aimed to develop evidence-informed principles to support preclinical spinal cord researchers to incorporate PPI into their research. METHODS: This study used a modified Delphi method with the aim of establishing consensus on a set of principles for PPI in spinal cord research. Thirty-eight stakeholders including researchers, clinicians and people living with spinal cord injury took part in the expert panel. Participants were asked to rate their agreement with a series of statements relating to PPI in preclinical spinal cord research over two rounds. As part of Round 2, they were also asked to rate statements as essential or desirable. RESULTS: Thirty-eight statements were included in Round 1, after which five statements were amended and two additional statements were added. After Round 2, consensus (> 75% agreement) was reached for a total of 27 principles, with 13 rated as essential and 14 rated as desirable. The principles with highest agreement related to diversity in representation among PPI contributors, clarity of the purpose of PPI and effective communication. CONCLUSION: This research developed a previously unavailable set of evidence-informed principles to inform PPI in preclinical spinal cord research. These principles provide guidance for researchers seeking to conduct PPI in preclinical spinal cord research and may also inform PPI in other preclinical disciplines. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT STATEMENT: This study was conducted as part of a project aiming to develop PPI in preclinical spinal cord injury research associated with an ongoing research collaboration funded by the Irish Rugby Football Union Charitable Trust (IRFU CT) and the Science Foundation Ireland Centre for Advanced Materials and BioEngineering Research (SFI AMBER), with research conducted by the Tissue Engineering Research Group (TERG) at the RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences. The project aims to develop an advanced biomaterials platform for spinal cord repair and includes a PPI Advisory Panel comprising researchers, clinicians and seriously injured rugby players to oversee the work of the project. PPI is included in this study through the involvement of members of the PPI Advisory Panel in the conceptualisation of this research, review of findings, identification of key points for discussion and preparation of the study manuscript as co-authors.