Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 33
Filtrar
1.
Sci Total Environ ; 931: 172855, 2024 Jun 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692324

RESUMEN

Understanding how human actions and environmental change affect water resources is crucial for addressing complex water management issues. The scientific tools that can produce the necessary information are ecological indicators, referring to measurable properties of the ecosystem state; environmental monitoring, the data collection process that is required to evaluate the progress towards reaching water management goals; mathematical models, linking human disturbances with the ecosystem state to predict environmental impacts; and scenarios, assisting in long-term management and policy implementation. Paradoxically, despite the rapid generation of data, evolving scientific understanding, and recent advancements in systems modeling, there is a striking imbalance between knowledge production and knowledge utilization in decision-making. In this paper, we examine the role and potential capacity of scientific tools in guiding governmental decision-making processes and identify the most critical disparities between water management, policy, law, and science. We demonstrate how the complex, uncertain, and gradually evolving nature of scientific knowledge might not always fit aptly to the legislative and policy processes and structures. We contend that the solution towards increased understanding of socio-ecological systems and reduced uncertainty lies in strengthening the connections between water management theory and practice, among the scientific tools themselves, among different stakeholders, and among the social, economic, and ecological facets of water quality management, law, and policy. We conclude by tying in three knowledge-exchange strategies, namely - adaptive management, Driver-Pressure-Status-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework, and participatory modeling - that offer complementary perspectives to bridge the gap between science and policy.


Asunto(s)
Política Ambiental , Incertidumbre , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/métodos , Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Toma de Decisiones , Calidad del Agua , Ecosistema , Abastecimiento de Agua/legislación & jurisprudencia
11.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci ; 375(1814): 20190460, 2020 12 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33131444

RESUMEN

Despite their limited area relative to the global ocean, coastal zones-the regions where land meets the sea-play a disproportionately important role in generating ecosystem services. However, coastal ecosystems are under increasing pressure from human populations. In particular, urban stormwater is an increasingly important threat to the integrity of coastal systems. Urban catchments exhibit altered flow regimes that impact ecosystem processes and coastal foodwebs. In addition, urban stormwater contains complex and unpredictable mixtures of chemicals that result in a multitude of lethal and sublethal impacts on species in coastal systems. Along the western coast of the United States, we estimate that hundreds of billions of kilograms of suspended solids flow off land surfaces and enter the Northern California Current each year. However, 70% of this pollution could be addressed by treating only 1.35% of the land area. Determining how to prioritize treatment of stormwater in this region requires a clear articulation of objectives-spatial distribution of appropriate management actions is dependent on the life histories of species, and management schemes optimized for one species may not achieve desired objectives for other species. In particular, we highlight that the scale of stormwater interventions must match the ecological scale relevant to species targeted by management. In many cases, management and policy will require mechanisms in order to ensure that local actions scale-up to efficiently and effectively achieve management objectives. In the face of rapid urbanization of coastal zones, failure to consider the match of management and ecological scales will result in the continued decline of coastal ecosystems and the species they support. This article is part of the theme issue 'Integrative research perspectives on marine conservation'.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/métodos , Ecosistema , Inundaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Urbanización , California , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/métodos , Océano Pacífico , Contaminación del Agua/análisis
12.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf ; 187: 109839, 2020 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31670240

RESUMEN

The impact of marine litter, particularly plastic waste, is widely acknowledged as a growing global concern. Marine litter is an understudied issue in the Regional Organisation for Protection of the Marine Environment (ROPME) Sea Area where rapid economic growth has already placed considerable stress on infrastructure and coastal ecosystems. This paper outlines some of the drivers for waste generation in region and reviews the available literature to summarise the current state of knowledge on the environmental fate, behaviour and impact of marine litter within the ROPME Sea Area. While data is limited, those studies conducted demonstrate marine litter is posing a clear and growing threat to the environmental and socioeconomic prosperity of the ROPME Sea Area. The development of regional and national marine litter reduction plans are clearly a priority to focus and coordinate activity across multiple stakeholders. Discussion of the potential environmental impacts arising as a result of marine litter are presented together with a roadmap for establishing and implementing a ROPME Sea Area Marine Litter and Single-Use Plastic Action Plan.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/métodos , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Plásticos/análisis , Residuos/análisis , Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Ecosistema , Ambiente , Océano Índico , Control Social Formal
13.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 26(32): 32759-32763, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31586314

RESUMEN

The Water Framework Directive (WFD) currently supports chemical and ecological monitoring programmes in order to achieve the good water surface status. Although chemical and ecological assessments are necessary, they have some limitations. Chemical approaches focus on certain substances identified as priorities, but they do not take into account other potentially harmful substances and also ignore the hazards related to contaminant cocktails. On the other hand, while ecological approaches provide holistic information on the impairment of biological communities in ecosystems, they do not distinguish the role of contaminants in these alterations, and consequently do not allow the establishment of contaminant impact reduction plans. Consequently, ecotoxicologists suggest the use of effect-based tools such as biomarkers. Biomarkers highlight the effect of potentially harmful substances (or a cocktail), and their specificity towards the chemicals makes it possible to properly discriminate the role of toxicants within biological community impairments. Thus, the integration of such tools (besides existing chemical and ecological tools) in the WFD could considerably improve its biomonitoring strategy. The B n' B project (Biomarkers and Biodiversity) exposes key objectives that will allow to (i) establish an inventory of the biomarkers developed by French laboratories; (ii) determine their methodological advancement and limits and, on this basis, formulate recommendations for biomonitoring use and future research needs; (iii) discuss the biomarkers' ecological significance, specificity to contaminants and interpretation capacity; (iv) establish, in fine, a selection of valuable biomarkers to enter the WFD; and (iv) propose integrative tools to facilitate the decision-taking by stakeholders.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/métodos , Biomarcadores Ambientales , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Biodiversidad , Biomarcadores , Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Ecología , Ecosistema , Sustancias Peligrosas , Agua , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/análisis , Contaminación del Agua , Recursos Hídricos/provisión & distribución
14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31370177

RESUMEN

Land subsidence was once a major geo-hazard in the city of Shanghai, China. From 1921 to 1965, the maximum cumulative land subsidence in the urban areas of China reached 2.6 m. This large subsidence has resulted in high economic losses for Shanghai. The Regulation of Prevention and Control of Land Subsidence of Shanghai Municipality was published in 2013 (simply cited as the 2013-regulation in the following context). The characteristics of the 2013-regulation included the combination of the subsidence monitoring network and the groundwater detection network due to both the effects of groundwater withdrawal and construction. In addition, the setting up of a supervision system was also incorporated in the 2013-regulation. To control the land subsidence, Shanghai demarcated three land subsidence control zones, where special measures have been implemented. From a strategic environmental assessment (SEA) point of view, the 2013-regulation attains a high total score, indicating that the control of groundwater withdrawal and recharge is effective. The observed land subsidence over the past six years also confirms the effectiveness of the 2013-regulation with the most consideration of SEA for sustainable environment protection in Shanghai. However, more effort should be made in the implementation of SEA in land subsidence control in the future.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Monitoreo del Ambiente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política Ambiental , China , Ciudades , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/métodos , Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/métodos , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Regulación Gubernamental , Agua Subterránea
15.
Mar Pollut Bull ; 136: 84-91, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30509845

RESUMEN

Many shipwreck events occur in the neighboring areas of Taiwan due to the volume of maritime traffic and geographical conditions around Taiwan. The oil spills from such events can be devastating for the surrounding sea and coastal areas. The government realized the importance of marine pollution prevention and enforced the Marine Pollution Control Act and the Major Marine Oil Pollution Emergency Response Plan to mitigate the impact of oil spill pollution. The T.S. Taipei shipwreck highlighted the effectiveness of the national marine pollution prevention system. Inter-departmental cooperation and collaboration with private sectors are the keys for effective response. This article is the first detailed documentation of an oil spill response for a maritime incident from the beginning to the final termination of shipwreck removal. It shows the people in Taiwan intend to collaborate with other states to make a significant contribution to marine environment conservation and sustainability.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/métodos , Planificación en Desastres/legislación & jurisprudencia , Contaminación por Petróleo/prevención & control , Navíos , Contaminación del Agua/prevención & control , Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Planificación en Desastres/organización & administración , Regulación Gubernamental , Cooperación Internacional , Océanos y Mares , Contaminación por Petróleo/análisis , Contaminación por Petróleo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Taiwán , Contaminación del Agua/análisis , Contaminación del Agua/legislación & jurisprudencia
16.
PLoS One ; 13(12): e0207717, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30550603

RESUMEN

We determined the number of permits for oil and gas activities in 14 coastal Louisiana parishes from 1900 to 2017, compared them to land loss on this coast, and estimated their restoration potential. A total of 76,247 oil and gas recovery wells were permitted, of which 35,163 (46%) were on land (as of 2010) and 27,483 of which are officially abandoned. There is a direct spatial and temporal relationship between the number of these permits and land loss, attributable to the above and belowground changes in hydrology resulting from the dredged material levees placed parallel to the canal (spoil banks). These hydrologic modifications cause various direct and indirect compromises to plants and soils resulting in wetland collapse. Although oil and gas recovery beneath southern Louisiana wetlands has dramatically declined since its peak in the early 1960s, it has left behind spoil banks with a total length sufficient to cross coastal Louisiana 79 times from east to west. Dragging down the remaining material in the spoil bank back into the canal is a successful restoration technique that is rarely applied in Louisiana, but could be a dramatically cost-effective and proven long-term strategy if political will prevails. The absence of a State or Federal backfilling program is a huge missed opportunity to: 1) conduct cost-effective restoration at a relatively low cost, and, 2) conduct systematic restoration monitoring and hypothesis testing that advances knowledge and improves the efficacy of future attempts. The price of backfilling all canals is about $335 million dollars, or 0.67% of the State's Master Plan for restoration and a pittance of the economic value gained from extracting the oil and gas beneath over the last 100 years.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/métodos , Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/métodos , Humedales , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/economía , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/economía , Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Ecosistema , Sedimentos Geológicos , Hidrología , Concesión de Licencias , Louisiana , Industria del Petróleo y Gas/economía , Industria del Petróleo y Gas/legislación & jurisprudencia
17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30463192

RESUMEN

Water resources are fundamental for the social and economic development of a country and sustainability is the best approach to treat water-related problems. Therefore, sustainability studies of water resources are deemed urgent. Sustainability analysis methods should enable space-temporal monitoring, decision-making, and development of policies necessary for water governance. Furthermore, sustainability analysis methods should also integrate environment and socioeconomic variables into a single system. In this context, this study aimed to assess the water sustainability conditions of the River Grande Basin (BHRG), Brazil, before the implementation of the Integrated Water Resources Plan (IWRP), using the Barometer of Sustainability tool (BS). The River Grande basin was in an "almost unsustainable" condition and under high environmental stress. A significant imbalance between environmental and human well-being in the system was also observed. To achieve an acceptable sustainability condition, it is thus necessary to improve the environmental quality of the area. Among the priority thematic area, native vegetation recovery was the most urgent. Overall, the sustainability study based on the BS not only facilitates comprehension regarding environment and human interrelationships, but also provide references for policy formulations and water management.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Ríos , Brasil , Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política Ambiental , Contaminación del Agua/legislación & jurisprudencia , Calidad del Agua/normas , Abastecimiento de Agua/legislación & jurisprudencia , Abastecimiento de Agua/normas
18.
Environ Manage ; 62(6): 1048-1059, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30242528

RESUMEN

The collaborative approach for sustainable management of watersheds is built on engagement of diverse stakeholders. Climate variability and anthropogenic activities increasingly impose challenges to successful management, as do contrasts in stakeholder perceptions about those processes. To assess differences in perceptions about watershed issues, we conducted a focus group meeting of expert stakeholder groups from research institutions, and state and federal agencies in the management of Cimarron River Watershed, Oklahoma. We employed the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOTs) approach to identify important issues, and the analytic hierarchy process to rank the perceptions of these groups. We found incongruity between these two groups over internal factors (SW) and external factors (OT) risking sustainable watershed management. External threats such as climate change dominated the research group perceptions, whereas internally prevalent weaknesses such as inability to track water use and lack of a common platform to share scientific data, dominated the government group perceptions. Despite these differences, both groups identified the negative aspect (W + T) as dominant over the positive aspect (S + O), which suggests a pessimistic watershed management future, with risks prevailing over the opportunities. We see this particular congruity of these two stakeholders as an opportunity to initiate a collaborative approach to watershed management in Oklahoma. We also note that the most important factor from each group corresponds to a relatively modest importance from the other group, and therefore suggests the possibility of cooperation rather than conflict in management goals should collaborative watershed management become established in the watershed.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos , Investigación/organización & administración , Ríos/química , Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Bosques , Agencias Gubernamentales , Humanos , Oklahoma , Percepción , Formulación de Políticas , Competencia Profesional , Investigación/legislación & jurisprudencia
19.
Environ Manage ; 62(2): 334-351, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29637277

RESUMEN

Water abstraction from rivers and aquifers has considerable potential to alter flow regimes, thereby influencing the physical, chemical, and ecological well-being of freshwater ecosystems. The economic and social benefits of abstraction need to be balanced against its potentially deleterious consequences for hydrologically-driven ecological functions, ecosystem services, cultural values, and recreation. In New Zealand, recent legislation states that limits for the use of water resources should be set for all waterbodies to manage the potential cumulative impacts of abstraction and reduce allocation of the hydrological resource in over-allocated catchments. These limits must comprise at least a predefined minimum flow (the flow at which all abstraction must cease) and a total allocation (the maximum rate of abstraction summed across upstream abstractions). Over-allocation occurs when the sum of all upstream abstractions exceeds the total allocation. A national database describing consents to abstract water was collated. A replicable, transferable, and objective method was applied to calculate total allocation at the national, catchment, and reach scales across the entire country. Total allocation for each catchment was expressed by mapping Weighted Allocation Impact; an index that integrates magnitude and spread of water resource allocation across entire catchments. Results show that existing consents have caused over-allocation in several catchments, prompting questions about how to reduce abstraction in these locations.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/métodos , Agua Dulce/análisis , Regulación Gubernamental , Movimientos del Agua , Abastecimiento de Agua/legislación & jurisprudencia , Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Ecología , Ecosistema , Hidrología , Nueva Zelanda
20.
Mar Pollut Bull ; 127: 463-477, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29475687

RESUMEN

Estuaries are amongst the most socio-economically and ecologically important environments however, due to competing and conflicting demands, management is often challenging with a complex legislative framework managed by multiple agencies. To facilitate the understanding of this legislative framework, we have developed a GISbased Estuarine Planning Support System tool. The tool integrates the requirements of the relevant legislation and provides a basis for assessing the current environmental state of an estuary as well as informing and assessing new plans to ensure a healthy estuarine state. The tool ensures that the information is easily accessible for regulators, managers, developers and the public. The tool is intended to be adaptable, but is assessed using the Humber Estuary, United Kingdom as a case study area. The successful application of the tool for complex socio-economic and environmental systems demonstrates that the tool can efficiently guide users through the complex requirements needed to support sustainable development.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/métodos , Ecosistema , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Estuarios , Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/economía , Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Toma de Decisiones , Monitoreo del Ambiente/economía , Monitoreo del Ambiente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estuarios/economía , Regulación Gubernamental , Factores Socioeconómicos , Reino Unido
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...