Postmastectomy radiation therapy technique and cardiopulmonary sparing: A dosimetric comparative analysis between photons and protons with free breathing versus deep inspiration breath hold.

PURPOSE: Dosimetric studies have suggested greater cardiopulmonary sparing with protons over photons for left-sided postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). Modern techniques such as deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) can help spare the heart. This analysis compares photon and proton delivery with and without DIBH. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten women with left breast cancer referred for PMRT on a prospective clinical trial with unfavorable cardiac anatomy underwent free breathing (FB) and DIBH computed tomography simulation. A partially wide tangent photon (PWTF) during DIBH, passively scattered proton during FB, pencil-beam scanning (PBS) proton during FB, and PBS proton during DIBH plan was completed for each patient. Plans were designed to achieve 95% prescription dose coverage to 95% of chest wall and regional lymphatics while maximally sparing heart and lungs. RESULTS: All techniques resulted in similar target coverage, although protons improved homogeneity indices and cardiopulmonary sparing (omnibus P < .0001 for each metric). Heart/lung metrics for PWTF with DIBH, scattered protons with FB, PBS protons with FB, and PBS protons with DIBH, respectively, were as follows: mean heart dose (2.09, 0.39, 0.98, 0.71 Gy relative biological effectiveness [RBE]), mean left ventricle dose (3.72, 0.08, 0.19, 0.21 GyRBE), V20 left ventricle (2.73, 0.03, 0, 0%), maximum left anterior descending artery dose (46.14, 8.28, 4.58, 4.63 GyRBE), mean lung dose (13.30, 5.74, 7.63, 7.49 GyRBE), and V20 lung (26.04, 12.04, 15.18, 14.43 %). Pairwise testing confirmed an improvement in each metric with all proton plans compared with PWTF with DIBH; there were no differences in homogeneity indices or cardiopulmonary sparing between passively scattered and PBS protons, regardless of addition of DIBH. CONCLUSIONS: For left-sided PMRT, passively scattered or PBS protons with or without DIBH improves homogeneity and cardiopulmonary sparing without compromise in target coverage compared with PWTF photons with DIBH. Furthermore, the addition of DIBH to proton therapy did not provide a significant dosimetric benefit.

A dosimetric analysis of cardiac dose with or without active breath coordinator moderate deep inspiratory breath hold in left sided breast cancer radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Cardiac toxicity is a major concern for left breast tangential field irradiation. The left ventricle and left anterior descending (LAD) artery are suggested to be radiosensitive and radiation to these structures leads to late lethal cardiotoxicity. Moderate deep inspiration breath hold (mDIBH) during radiation treatment delivery helps in reducing the cardiac dose. This study compares dosimetric parameters of heart with and without active breath coordinator (ABC) mDIBH during tangential field breast cancer radiation. STUDY TYPE: This is a dosimetric comparative study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients with left-sided breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant tangential field and radiotherapy with ABC mDIBH between November 2013 and September 2015 in our center were analyzed in this study. The ABC device was used for respiratory control and patients who could hold their breath for 20-30 s were considered for radiation with ABC mDIBH. Simulation scans of both free breathing (FB) and ABC mDIBH were done. Tangent field treatment plans with a dose prescription of 40 Gy/15 Fr were generated for each patient, in both scans. Target coverage, dose to the heart, LAD, and the left lung were documented with dose-volume histograms. RESULTS: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 20 software, was used for analysis and the level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Mean heart dose was 308.5cGy with FB and 159cGy with ABC (P < 0.0001). Mean dose to the LAD was reduced by 53.81% (1320.64 cGy vs. 606.56 cGy, P < 0.001). Target coverage was equal in both the plans. CONCLUSION: We report that the use of ABC mDIBH technique resulted in a significant reduction in cardiac dose and hence can be considered as a promising tool for cardiac sparing.

Geometrical uncertainty of heart position in deep-inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the geometrical uncertainty of the position of the heart with daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) during deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) treatment of the left breast. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A visually guided optical respiratory monitoring system was used in DIBH treatment of 15 breast cancer patients. Heart position was determined in relation to the planning target volume (PTV) in 225 fractions in which daily low-dose CBCT images were compared with planning CT images. In addition, the position of the left lung apex and diaphragm was measured to evaluate the success of the DIBH. RESULTS: The median shift of the heart was 1 mm to the left, 1 mm superiorly and 0 mm in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction during the treatment course when compared to the PTV position in planning CT. Based on these movements, an AP margin of 4 mm, a lateral (LR) margin of 3 mm, and a superior-inferior (SI) margin of 5 mm should be added to the heart contour to ensure avoiding the heart when planning treatment. The distance between the left lung apex and diaphragm, applied as a surrogate for lung volume, was 2mm (median) smaller during the CBCT acquisitions than during the planning CT acquisition. The correlation coefficient between the surrogate of lung volume and the distance between the heart and PTV was r = .46 in the AP, r = .72 in the LR and r = .79 in the SI directions. CONCLUSION: Residual variation was observed in the position of the heart in comparison to PTV, even with a visually guided DIBH technique. These geometrical uncertainties should be taken into account when planning radiotherapy treatment. The success of DIBH may make a major contribution to the variation of the heart position during treatment.

Left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy with and without breath-hold: does IMRT reduce the cardiac dose even further?

PURPOSE: In radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer, Active Breathing Control enables a decrease of cardiac and Left Anterior Descending (LAD) coronary artery dose. We compared 3D-Conformal (3D-CRT) to Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans based on free-breathing (FB) and breath-hold (BH). We investigated whether IMRT enables an additional decrease of cardiac dose in radiotherapy plans with and without BH. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients referred for whole breast irradiation were included. The whole breast, heart and LAD-region were contoured. Four treatment plans were generated: FB_3D-CRT; FB_IMRT; BH_3D-CRT; BH_IMRT. Several doses were obtained from Dose Volume Histograms and compared. Results were compared statistically using the Wilcoxin Signed Rank Test. For heart and LAD-region, a significant dose reduction was found in BH (p<0.01). For both BH and FB, a significant dose reduction was found using IMRT (p<0.01). By using IMRT an average reduction of 5% was noted in the LAD-region for the volume receiving 20Gy. In 5 cases, the LAD-region remained situated in the vicinity of the radiation portals even in BH. Nevertheless, with IMRT the LAD dose was reduced in these cases. CONCLUSION: IMRT results in a significant additional decrease of dose in the heart and LAD-region in both breath-hold and free-breathing.

The UK HeartSpare Study: randomised evaluation of voluntary deep-inspiratory breath-hold in women undergoing breast radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To determine whether voluntary deep-inspiratory breath-hold (v_DIBH) and deep-inspiratory breath-hold with the active breathing coordinator™ (ABC_DIBH) in patients undergoing left breast radiotherapy are comparable in terms of normal-tissue sparing, positional reproducibility and feasibility of delivery. METHODS: Following surgery for early breast cancer, patients underwent planning-CT scans in v_DIBH and ABC_DIBH. Patients were randomised to receive one technique for fractions 1-7 and the second technique for fractions 8-15 (40 Gy/15 fractions total). Daily electronic portal imaging (EPI) was performed and matched to digitally-reconstructed radiographs. Cone-beam CT (CBCT) images were acquired for 6/15 fractions and matched to planning-CT data. Population systematic (Σ) and random errors (σ) were estimated. Heart, left-anterior-descending coronary artery, and lung doses were calculated. Patient comfort, radiographer satisfaction and scanning/treatment times were recorded. Within-patient comparisons between the two techniques used the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were recruited. All completed treatment with both techniques. EPI-derived Σ were ≤ 1.8mm (v_DIBH) and ≤ 2.0mm (ABC_DIBH) and σ ≤ 2.5mm (v_DIBH) and ≤ 2.2mm (ABC_DIBH) (all p non-significant). CBCT-derived Σ were ≤ 3.9 mm (v_DIBH) and ≤ 4.9 mm (ABC_DIBH) and σ ≤ 4.1mm (v_DIBH) and ≤ 3.8mm (ABC_DIBH). There was no significant difference between techniques in terms of normal-tissue doses (all p non-significant). Patients and radiographers preferred v_DIBH (p=0.007, p=0.03, respectively). Scanning/treatment setup times were shorter for v_DIBH (p=0.02, p=0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: v_DIBH and ABC_DIBH are comparable in terms of positional reproducibility and normal tissue sparing. v_DIBH is preferred by patients and radiographers, takes less time to deliver, and is cheaper than ABC_DIBH.

Effects of GSM 900 MHz on middle cerebral artery blood flow assessed by transcranial Doppler sonography.

Mobile phone use has increased worldwide but its possible effects on the brain remain unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of acute exposure to a radio frequency electromagnetic field (RF EMF) generated by a mobile phone operating in the Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM) 900 MHz on cerebral blood flow. Twenty-nine volunteers attended two experimental sessions: a sham exposure session and a real exposure session in a cross-over double-blind study in which a mobile phone was positioned on the left side of the head. In one session, the mobile phone was operated without RF radiation (sham phone) and in the other study it was operated with RF radiation (real phone) for 20 min. Thus, each subject served as its own control. Middle cerebral artery blood flow was monitored noninvasively by transcranial Doppler sonography to measure middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity. Pulsatility index and resistance index were also evaluated. A voluntary breath holding physiological test was carried out as a positive control for testing cerebral vasoreactivity. Hemodynamic variables were recorded and analyzed before, during and after mobile phone exposure. No significant changes were detected in studied variables in middle cerebral arteries during sham or real exposure. In the exposed side the cerebral blood flow velocity, the pulsatility index and the resistance index during sham and real exposure were respectively: [61.9 ± 1.3, 61.7 ± 1.3 cm/s (P = 0.89)]; [0.93 ± 0.03, 0.90 ± 0.02 (P = 0.84)] and [0.58 ± 0.01, 0.58 ± 0.01 (P = 0.96)] at baseline; and [60.6 ± 1.3, 62 ± 1.6 cm/s (P = 0.40)]; [0.91 ± 0.03, 0.87 ± 0.03 (P = 0.97)]; [0.57 ± 0.01, 0.56 ± 0.01 (P = 0.82)] after 20 min of exposure. Twenty minutes of RF exposure to a mobile phone does not seem to affect the cerebral circulation.