Cost-effectiveness of craniotomy versus decompressive craniectomy for UK patients with traumatic acute subdural haematoma.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of craniotomy, compared with decompressive craniectomy (DC) in UK patients undergoing evacuation of acute subdural haematoma (ASDH). DESIGN: Economic evaluation undertaken using health resource use and outcome data from the 12-month multicentre, pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised, Randomised Evaluation of Surgery with Craniectomy for Patients Undergoing Evacuation-ASDH trial. SETTING: UK secondary care. PARTICIPANTS: 248 UK patients undergoing surgery for traumatic ASDH were randomised to craniotomy (N=126) or DC (N=122). INTERVENTIONS: Surgical evacuation via craniotomy (bone flap replaced) or DC (bone flap left out with a view to replace later: cranioplasty surgery). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In the base-case analysis, costs were estimated from a National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective. Outcomes were assessed via the quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) derived from the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (cost-utility analysis) and the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) (cost-effectiveness analysis). Multiple imputation and regression analyses were conducted to estimate the mean incremental cost and effect of craniotomy compared with DC. The most cost-effective option was selected, irrespective of the level of statistical significance as is argued by economists. RESULTS: In the cost-utility analysis, the mean incremental cost of craniotomy compared with DC was estimated to be -£5520 (95% CI -£18 060 to £7020) with a mean QALY gain of 0.093 (95% CI 0.029 to 0.156). In the cost-effectiveness analysis, the mean incremental cost was estimated to be -£4536 (95% CI -£17 374 to £8301) with an OR of 1.682 (95% CI 0.995 to 2.842) for a favourable outcome on the GOSE. CONCLUSIONS: In a UK population with traumatic ASDH, craniotomy was estimated to be cost-effective compared with DC: craniotomy was estimated to have a lower mean cost, higher mean QALY gain and higher probability of a more favourable outcome on the GOSE (though not all estimated differences between the two approaches were statistically significant). ETHICS: Ethical approval for the trial was obtained from the North West-Haydock Research Ethics Committee in the UK on 17 July 2014 (14/NW/1076). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN87370545.

Decompressive Craniectomy for Hemispheric Infarction in a Low-Income Population.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a worldwide leading cause of mortality and disability, and there are substantial economic costs for poststroke care. Disadvantaged populations show increased incidence, severity, and unfavorable outcomes. This study aimed to report the survival, functional outcome, and caregiver satisfaction of low-income patients diagnosed with a large hemispheric infarction (LHI) who underwent decompressive craniectomy (DC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted in consecutive adult patients with an LHI who underwent DC at a single center between October 2015 and September 2019. Demographic, clinical, and radiologic data were reviewed. The primary outcomes were 1-year survival and favorable functional outcome. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included; those <60 years of age showed a higher proportion of favorable functional outcomes (76% vs. 33%; P = 0.031) but similar survival (52% vs. 56%; P = 0.645) than older patients, respectively. Performing the craniectomy in <48 hours from stroke onset compared with ≥48 hours showed no statistically significant differences in survival (59% vs. 46%; P = 0.352) and favorable functional outcomes (56% vs. 70%; P = 0.683), respectively. In retrospective thinking, 79% of caregivers would decide to perform the surgery again. CONCLUSIONS: Age group and time from stroke onset to craniectomy were not associated with survival; notwithstanding, a higher proportion of patients <60 years of age were associated with a favorable functional outcome compared with older patients. Additionally, if given the option, most caregivers would decide to perform the surgery again, independently of the grade of disability of the patient.

A Safe Transitions Pathway for post-craniotomy neurological surgery patients: high-value care that bypasses the intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: High-value medical care is described as care that leads to excellent patient outcomes, high patient satisfaction, and efficient costs. Neurosurgical care in particular can be expensive for the hospital, as substantial costs are accrued during the operation and throughout the postoperative stay. The authors developed a "Safe Transitions Pathway" (STP) model in which select patients went to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and then the neuro-transitional care unit (NTCU) rather than being directly admitted to the neurosciences intensive care unit (ICU) following a craniotomy. They sought to evaluate the clinical and financial outcomes as well as the impact on the patient experience for patients who participated in the STP and bypassed the ICU level of care. METHODS: Patients were enrolled during the 2018 fiscal year (FY18; July 1, 2017, through June 30, 2018). The electronic medical record was reviewed for clinical information and the hospital cost accounting record was reviewed for financial information. Nurses and patients were given a satisfaction survey to assess their respective impressions of the hospital stay and of the recovery pathway. RESULTS: No patients who proceeded to the NTCU postoperatively were upgraded to the ICU level of care postoperatively. There were no deaths in the STP group, and no patients required a return to the operating room during their hospitalization (95% CI 0%-3.9%). There was a trend toward fewer 30-day readmissions in the STP patients than in the standard pathway patients (1.2% [95% CI 0.0%-6.8%] vs 5.1% [95% CI 2.5%-9.1%], p = 0.058). The mean number of ICU days saved per case was 1.20. The average postprocedure length of stay was reduced by 0.25 days for STP patients. Actual FY18 direct cost savings from 94 patients who went through the STP was $422,128. CONCLUSIONS: Length of stay, direct cost per case, and ICU days were significantly less after the adoption of the STP, and ICU bed utilization was freed for acute admissions and transfers. There were no substantial complications or adverse patient outcomes in the STP group.

Inverse National Trends in Decompressive Craniectomy versus Endovascular Thrombectomy for Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular thrombectomy (ET) for acute large vessel occlusion reduces infarct size, and it should hypothetically decrease the incidence of major ischemic strokes requiring decompressive craniectomy (DC). The aim of this retrospective cohort study is to determine trends in the utilization of ET versus DC for stroke in the United States over a 10-year span. METHODS: We extracted data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample using International Classification of Diseases-9/10 codes from 2006-2016. Patients with a primary diagnosis of stroke were included. Baseline demographics, outcomes, and hospital charges were analyzed. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 14,578,654 patients diagnosed with stroke. During the study period, DC and ET were performed in 124,718 and 62,637 patients, respectively. The number of stroke patients who underwent either ET or DC increased by 266% from 2006 to 2016. During that time period, the ET utilization rate increased (0.19% in 2006 to 14.07% in 2016, P < 0.0004), whereas the DC utilization rate decreased (7.07% in 2006 to 6.43% in 2016, P < 0.0001). In 2015, the utilization rate of ET (9.73%) exceeded that of DC (9.67%). ET-treated patients had shorter hospitalization durations (mean 8.8 vs. 16.8 days, P < 0.0001), lower mortality (16.2% vs. 19.3%), higher likelihood of discharge home (27.1% vs. 24.1%, P < 0.0001), and reduced hospital charges (mean $189,724 vs. $261,314, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We identified an inverse relationship between national trends in rising ET and diminishing DC utilization for stroke treatment over a recent decade. Although direct causation cannot be inferred, our findings suggest that ET curtails the necessity for DC.

Analysis of direct costs of decompressive craniectomy in victims of traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Decompressive craniectomy is a procedure required in some cases of traumatic brain injury (TBI). This manuscript evaluates the direct costs and outcomes of decompressive craniectomy for TBI in a developing country and describes the epidemiological profile. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed using a five-year neurosurgical database, taking a sample of patients with TBI who underwent decompressive craniectomy. Several variables were considered and a formula was developed for calculating the total cost. RESULTS: Most patients had multiple brain lesions and the majority (69.0%) developed an infectious complication. The general mortality index was 68.8%. The total cost was R$ 2,116,960.22 (US$ 661,550.06) and the mean patient cost was R$ 66,155.00 (US$ 20,673.44). CONCLUSIONS: Decompressive craniectomy for TBI is an expensive procedure that is also associated with high morbidity and mortality. This was the first study performed in a developing country that aimed to evaluate the direct costs. Prevention measures should be a priority.

Analysis of direct costs of decompressive craniectomy in victims of traumatic brain injury / Análise dos custos diretos da craniectomia descompressiva em vítimas de traumatismo cranioencefálico

ABSTRACT Background: Decompressive craniectomy is a procedure required in some cases of traumatic brain injury (TBI). This manuscript evaluates the direct costs and outcomes of decompressive craniectomy for TBI in a developing country and describes the epidemiological profile. Methods: A retrospective study was performed using a five-year neurosurgical database, taking a sample of patients with TBI who underwent decompressive craniectomy. Several variables were considered and a formula was developed for calculating the total cost. Results: Most patients had multiple brain lesions and the majority (69.0%) developed an infectious complication. The general mortality index was 68.8%. The total cost was R$ 2,116,960.22 (US$ 661,550.06) and the mean patient cost was R$ 66,155.00 (US$ 20,673.44). Conclusions: Decompressive craniectomy for TBI is an expensive procedure that is also associated with high morbidity and mortality. This was the first study performed in a developing country that aimed to evaluate the direct costs. Prevention measures should be a priority.

RESUMO Introdução: A craniectomia descompressiva (CD) é procedimento necessário em alguns casos de trauma cranioencefálico (TCE). Este manuscrito objetiva avaliar os custos diretos e desfechos da CD no TCE em um país em desenvolvimento e descrever o perfil epidemiológico. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo foi realizado usando banco de dados neurocirúrgico de cinco anos, considerando amostra de pacientes com TCE que realizaram CD. Algumas variáveis foram analisadas e foi desenvolvida uma fórmula para cálculo do custo total. Resultados: A maioria dos pacientes teve múltiplas lesões intracranianas, sendo que 69.0% evoluíram com algum tipo de complicação infecciosa. A taxa de mortalidade foi de 68,8%. O custo total foi R$ 2.116.960,22 (US$ 653,216.00) e o custo médio por paciente foi R$ 66.155,00 (US$ 20,415.00). Conclusões: CD no TCE é um procedimento caro e associado á alta morbidade e mortalidade. Este foi o primeiro estudo realizado em um país em desenvolvimento com o objetivo de avaliar os custos diretos. Medidas de prevenção devem ser priorizadas.

Bone flap resorption following cranioplasty in a cost-constrained scenario.

Bone flap resorption is an infrequently reported yet significant late complication of autologous bone cranioplasty. It requires serial imaging both to pick up and to monitor progression. Custom-made implants avoid this complication, but are expensive. In a resource-limited situation, when bone flaps placed in the abdomen undergo demineralisation and sutures are used to fix the flap as opposed to plates, where artificial cranial flap substitutes are prohibitively expensive and frequent postoperative imaging may not be feasible, prevention and management of this complication will continue to remain a problem.

Clinical and Radiologic Outcome of a Less Invasive, Low-Cost Surgical Technique of Osteoplastic Decompressive Craniectomy.

BACKGROUND: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) has many technical details with significant constraining logistic/economic considerations in low-resource practice areas. We present a less invasive, cost-saving, and evidence-based technique of DC evolving in our practice. METHODS: Earlier, we reported a technique of hinge decompressive craniectomy (hDC), in which the frontotemporoparietal skull flap is hinged on the temporal muscle. In this article we describe further refinements of this temporal muscle hDC : The scalp flap is raised in a galeal-skeletonizing plane preserving the subgaleal fascia on the pericranium, ready for use for duraplasty after durotomy. We performed a descriptive analysis of the clinical outcome of this surgical technique in a prospective consecutive cohort of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The primary and secondary clinical outcome measures were in-hospital mortality and survival, respectively, and the immediate as well as long-term surgical wound issues. RESULTS: There were 40 cases, 38 men (95%) and 2 women over a 40-month period with a mild (n = 8), moderate (n = 17), or severe TBI (n = 15). As assessed by the computed tomography Rotterdam score, life-threatening significant brain injury was present in 90%. Poor clinical outcome occurred in about a third of cases (32.5%) mainly in the severe TBI group (77% of poor outcome) and not in the mild TBI group. Surgical site complications occurred in four patients (10%) CONCLUSIONS: The presented modified temporal muscle hDC technique offers significant economic advantages over the traditional surgical method of DC without added complications. Analysis of the clinical data in a consecutive prospective cohort of patients with potentially fatal TBI who underwent this surgical procedure showed a good outcome in at least two thirds.

Economic evaluation of decompressive craniectomy versus barbiturate coma for refractory intracranial hypertension following traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVES: Decompressive craniectomy and barbiturate coma are often used as second-tier strategies when intracranial hypertension following severe traumatic brain injury is refractory to first-line treatments. Uncertainty surrounds the decision to choose either treatment option. We investigated which strategy is more economically attractive in this context. DESIGN: We performed a cost-utility analysis. A Markov Monte Carlo microsimulation model with a life-long time horizon was created to compare quality-adjusted survival and cost of the two treatment strategies, from the perspective of healthcare payer. Model parameters were estimated from the literature. Two-dimensional simulation was used to incorporate parameter uncertainty into the model. Value of information analysis was conducted to identify major drivers of decision uncertainty and focus future research. SETTING: Trauma centers in the United States. SUBJECTS: Base case was a population of patients (mean age = 25 yr) who developed refractory intracranial hypertension following traumatic brain injury. INTERVENTIONS: We compared two treatment strategies: decompressive craniectomy and barbiturate coma. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Decompressive craniectomy was associated with an average gain of 1.5 quality-adjusted life years relative to barbiturate coma, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $9,565/quality-adjusted life year gained. Decompressive craniectomy resulted in a greater quality-adjusted life expectancy 86% of the time and was more cost-effective than barbiturate coma in 78% of cases if our willingness-to-pay threshold is $50,000/quality-adjusted life year and 82% of cases at a threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life year. At older age, decompressive craniectomy continued to increase survival but at higher cost (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio = $197,906/quality-adjusted life year at mean age = 85 yr). CONCLUSIONS: Based on available evidence, decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of refractory intracranial hypertension following traumatic brain injury provides better value in terms of costs and health gains than barbiturate coma. However, decompressive craniectomy might be less economically attractive for older patients. Further research, particularly on natural history of severe traumatic brain injury patients, is needed to make more informed treatment decisions.

Autologous bone flap versus hydroxyapatite prosthesis in first intention in secondary cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a French medico-economical study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Decompressive craniectomy is the most common justification for cranioplasty. A medico-economial study based on the effective cost of the hydroxyapatite prosthesis, the percentage of autologous bone graft's loss due to bacterial contamination and the healthcare reimbursment, will allow us to define the best strategy in term of Healthcare economy management for the cranioplasties. A comparison was made between the two groups of patients, autologous bone flap versus custom-made prosthesis in first intention, based on the clinical experience of our department of neurosurgery. RESULTS: No differences was shown between the two groups of patients, in terms of lenght of in-hospital stay and population's characteristics or medical codification. The mean cost of a cranioplasty using the autologous bone graft in first intention was €4045, while the use of hydroxyapatite prosthesis led to a cost of €8000 per cranioplasty. CONCLUSION: In term of Healthcare expenses, autologous bone flap should be used in first intention for cranioplasties, unless the flap is contaminated or in specific indications, when the 3D custom-made hydroxyapatite prosthesis should be privilegied.

Cost-effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy as a lifesaving rescue procedure for patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Decompressive craniectomy has been traditionally used as a lifesaving rescue procedure for patients with refractory intracranial hypertension after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), but its cost-effectiveness remains uncertain. METHODS: Using data on length of stay in hospital, rehabilitation facility, procedural costs, and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) up to 18 months after surgery, the average total hospital costs per life-year and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) were calculated for patients who had decompressive craniectomy for TBI between 2004 and 2010 in Western Australia. The Corticosteroid Randomisation After Significant Head Injury prediction model was used to quantify the severity of TBI. RESULTS: Of the 168 patients who had 18-month follow-up data available after the procedure, 70 (42%) achieved a good outcome (GOS-5), 27 (16%) had moderate disability (GOS-4), 34 (20%) had severe disability (GOS-3), 5 (3%) were in vegetative state (GOS-2), and 32 (19%) died (GOS-1). The hospital costs increased with the severity of TBI and peaked when the predicted risk of an unfavorable outcome was about 80%. The average cost per life-year gained (US$671,000 per life-year) and QALY (US$682,000 per QALY) increased substantially and became much more than the usual acceptable cost-effective limit (US$100,000 per QALY) when the predicted risk of an unfavorable outcome was >80%. Changing different underlying assumptions of the analysis did not change the results significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Severity of TBI had an important effect on cost-effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy. As a lifesaving procedure, decompressive craniectomy was not cost-effective for patients with extremely severe TBI.

Neurotrauma and the rule of rescue.

The rule of rescue describes the powerful human proclivity to rescue identified endangered lives, regardless of cost or risk. Deciding whether or not to perform a decompressive craniectomy as a life-saving or 'rescue' procedure for a young person with a severe traumatic brain injury provides a good example of the ethical tensions that occur in these situations. Unfortunately, there comes a point when the primary brain injury is so severe that if the patient survives they are likely to remain severely disabled and fully dependent. The health resource implications of this outcome are significant. By using a web-based outcome prediction model this study compares the long-term outcome and designation of two groups of patients. One group had a very severe injury as adjudged by the model and the other group a less severe injury. At 18 month follow-up there were significant differences in outcome and healthcare requirements. This raises important ethical issues when considering life-saving but non-restorative surgical intervention. The discussion about realistic outcome cannot be dichotomised into simply life or death so that the outcome for the patient must enter the equation. As in other 'rescue situations', the utility of the procedure cannot be rationalised on a mere cost-benefit analysis. A compromise has to be reached to determine at what point either the likely outcome would be unacceptable to the person on whom the procedure is being performed or the social utility gained from the rule of rescue intervention fails to justify the utilitarian value and justice of equitable resource allocation.

Cost-effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injuries.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is used regularly in traumatic brain injury (TBI). There are, however, no cost-effectiveness studies of the procedure. METHODS: We evaluated the outcomes and treatment costs of all decompressive craniectomies performed between the 2000 and 2006 in a single institution to lower intractable intracranial pressure after TBI. The health-related quality of life was evaluated on the Euroqol (EQ-5D) questionnaire and on the visual-analogue scale (VAS), and cost of a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was calculated. RESULTS: In this study of 54 patients, the median follow-up time was 5.6 years. Overall mortality rate was 41%. Of the 22 non-survivors, 73% died within 30 days. For 32 survivors, the median EQ-5D index value was 0.85, which is equal to the normal population. The median VAS value was 73, whilst normal population's value is 80. Of the survivors, 81% (26/32) were able to live at home and 31% (10/32) returned to work. The cost of neurosurgical treatment for one QALY was 2400 €. Estimation for all medical costs, including rehabilitation and anticipated future costs, resulted cost of a QALY 17,900 €. CONCLUSION: Mortality after severe TBI leading to DC was high, but amongst the survivors, the health-related quality of life was equal to normal population. Most survivors were able to live at home and were almost as satisfied with their health as in general people are. Cost of neurosurgical treatment was low, and also including all evaluated costs, cost of a QALY gained was acceptable.

Cost-effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy in non-traumatic neurological emergencies.

BACKGROUND: Decompressive craniectomy is used regularly in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. Its benefits for other causes of non-traumatic brain swelling, if any, are unclear, especially after a devastating primary event. METHODS: We evaluated the outcomes as well as treatment costs of all emergency decompressive craniectomies performed between the 2000 and 2006 in a single institution to lower intractable intracranial pressure, excluding the standard indications TBI and malignant middle cerebral infarction. The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was evaluated on the Euroqol (EQ-5D) scale, and cost of a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) calculated. RESULTS: The overall 3-year mortality rate was 62% for subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH, 29 patients) and 31% for other neurological emergencies (13 patients). Patients with SAH were on average 13 years older than the other indications mean. Of the non-survivors, 45% died within a month and 95% within 1 year. Median EQ-5D index values were poor (0.15 for SAH and 0.62 for the other emergencies, versus 0.85 for the normal population), but of the survivors, 73% and 89% were able to live at home. The cost of neurosurgical treatment for one QALY was 11,000 € for SAH and 2000 € for other emergencies. CONCLUSION: Mortality after non-traumatic neurological emergencies leading to decompressive craniectomy was high, and the HRQoL index of the survivors was poor. Most survivors were, however, able to live at home, and the cost of neurosurgical treatment for a QALY gained was acceptable.