Evaluation of the effect of voxelotor and darbepoetin alfa on hemoglobin levels in patients with sickle cell disease.

BACKGROUND: To date, there is limited evidence on patients utilizing both voxelotor and darbepoetin alfa and its impact on hemoglobin levels. The objective is to evaluate the effect of voxelotor and darbepoetin alfa on hemoglobin levels in patients with SCD. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review study that assessed the primary independent variable as the utilization of either voxelotor alone, darbepoetin alfa alone, or the concurrent administration of voxelotor and darbepoetin alfa. Descriptive statistics were utilized to obtain the mean standard deviation for numerical variables and proportions for categorical variables. RESULTS: A total of 23 participants were included in this study. When comparing baseline to 2 months and 3 months, participants on voxelotor alone experienced a 3% decrease and a 6.6% increase in hemoglobin, darbepoetin alfa alone group a 4.3% decrease and a 0.6% increase in hemoglobin and voxelotor and darbepoetin group a 4.4% decrease and a 0.5% decrease in hemoglobin levels. Fifty percent of the participants in the voxelotor group and 6 (66.7%) participants in the voxelotor plus darbepoetin alfa group experienced adverse drug events. CONCLUSIONS: Voxelotor resulted in a clinically significant difference in the percent change of hemoglobin from baseline to 3 months.

Comparative Safety of Long-Acting vs. Short-Acting Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents Among Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis.

Both short-acting (epoetin alfa or beta) and long-acting (darbepoetin alfa or PEG-epoetin) erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are commonly prescribed for patients with kidney failure undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. We compared the risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and of all-cause mortality associated with receipt of short- vs. long-acting ESAs. This retrospective cohort analysis included Medicare hemodialysis beneficiaries aged ≥ 18 years in the United States Renal Data System from January 2015 to December 2017. We included adults who survived > 90 days after initiating hemodialysis and received either short- or long-acting ESAs. Outcomes were MACE (first occurrence of stroke, acute myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular-related mortality) and all-cause mortality. After stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting, Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome. Of 68,607 patients (mean age: 65 years, 45% females), 33,658 (49%) received long-acting ESAs and 34,949 (51%) received short-acting ESAs. There was no difference in the risk of MACE associated with receipt of short- vs. long-acting ESAs (HR: 1.02 (95% CI: 0.98-1.08)). However, long-acting (vs. short-acting) ESA receipt was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.96)). Compared with short-acting ESAs, long-acting ESAs were associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality, with no difference in the risk of MACE. Future studies with a longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.

El modelo de control de anemia: ¿ayuda al nefrólogo en la decisión terapéutica para el manejo de la anemia? / The anaemia control model: Does it help nephrologists in therapeutic decision-making in the management of anaemia?

INTRODUCCIÓN: La anemia es frecuente en los pacientes en hemodiálisis, y su tratamiento con estimulantes de la eritropoyesis (AEE) resulta complejo debido a múltiples factores. OBJETIVOS: Valorar la utilidad del modelo de control de anemia (MCA) en el tratamiento de la anemia en hemodiálisis. MÉTODOS: El MCA es un software que predice la dosis óptima de darbepoetina y hierro sacarosa para alcanzar niveles de hemoglobina (Hb) y ferritina deseados, emitiendo sugerencias de prescripción. Estudio realizado en clínicas de diálisis de 18 meses de duración en dos fases de intervención (FI) con MCA (FI1, n: 213; FI2, n: 218) separadas por una fase de control (FC, n: 219). El resultado primario fue el porcentaje de Hb en rango y la mediana de dosis de AEE y los resultados secundarios fueron las transfusiones, las hospitalizaciones o los acontecimientos cardiovasculares. Análisis a nivel de clínica y de pacientes valorando la variabilidad de la Hb mediante la desviación estándar (DE) de esta. También se analizaron pacientes con la mayoría de sugerencias confirmadas (grupo MCA cumplidores) RESULTADOS: El MCA aumentó el porcentaje de Hb en rango: 80,9% FI2 frente a 72,7% en FC, y redujo el consumo de darbepoetina (FI1: 20 [70]; FC 30 [80] μg, p = 0,032) con menor fluctuación de la Hb (0,91 ± 0,49 en FC a 0,82 ± 0,37g/dl en FI2; p < 0,05) mejorando en el grupo MCA cumplidores. En cuanto a los resultados secundarios, descendieron con el uso del MCA. CONCLUSIONES: El MCA ayuda a obtener mejores resultados de anemia en los pacientes en hemodiálisis, minimizando los riesgos del tratamiento con AEE y reduciendo costes

INTRODUCTION: Anaemia is common in haemodialysis patients and treating it with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) is complex due to many factors. OBJECTIVES: To assess the usefulness of the Anaemia Control Model (ACM) in the treatment of anaemia in haemodialysis. METHODS: ACM is a software that predicts the optimal dose of darbepoetin and iron sucrose to achieve target haemoglobin (Hb) and ferritin levels, and makes prescription suggestions. Study conducted in dialysis clinics lasting 18months with two intervention phases (IPs) with ACM (IP1, n:213; IP2, n:218) separated by a control phase (CP, n:219). The primary outcome was the percentage of Hb in range and the median dose of ESAs, and the secondary outcomes were transfusion, hospitalisation and cardiovascular events. Clinical and patient analyses were performed. Hb variability was assessed by the standard deviation (SD) of the Hb. We also analysed the patients with most of the suggestions confirmed (ACM compliant group). RESULTS: ACM increased the percentage of Hb in range: 80.9% in IP2, compared with 72.7% in the CP and reduced the intake of darbepoetin (IP1: 20 [70]; CP 30 [80] μg P = 0.032) with less Hb fluctuation (0.91 ± 0.49 in the CP to 0.82 ± 0.37 g/dl in IP2, P < 0.05), improving in the ACM compliant group. The secondary outcomes decreased with the use of ACM. CONCLUSIONS: ACM helps to obtain better anaemia results in haemodialysis patients, minimising the risks of treatment with ESAs and red

Protective effects of Tadalafil and darbepoetin against ischemia - reperfusion injury in a rat testicular torsion model

ABSTRACT Objectives: To evaluate protective effects of darbepoetin and tadalafil against ischemia-reperfusion injury in ipsilateral and contralateral testicle. Materials and Methods: Thirty 3-month-old adult male Wistar-Albino rats were randomly divided into 5 groups (A-E). Sham operation was performed in the first group. In Group B, rats did not received any medication after creating 720 degrees torsion of the left testis. The rats in Group C, D and E received darbepoetin, tadalafil, and darbepoetin/tadalafil combination 30 minutes after creating 720 degrees torsion of the left testis, respectively. The testes of rats in these three groups were detorsioned at 90 minutes after drug administration. Both testes were removed at 30 minutes after detorsion. Results: There were significant differences between the groups in terms of the degree of histopathological damage, Johnsen score, fibrosis score and caspase-3 immunoreactivity in the torsioned testes (p: 0.000). The results for each parameter in the left testes were significantly better in the darbepoetin / tadalafil combination group. Similarly, there were also significant differences in the contralateral testes (p: 0.000). Conclusion: The active substances darbepoetin and tadalafil that were used as a combination had protective effects on both testes and produced out better results in preserving testicular histology. Especially in cases where it is not possible to rescue the torsioned testis, this result was more noticeable in the contralateral testis.