Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 116
Filtrar
1.
Glob Health Action ; 13(1): 1829827, 2020 12 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33076795

RESUMEN

Background: Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) is a concept of human rights applied to sexuality and reproduction. Suboptimal access to SRHR services in many low-income countries results in poor health outcomes. Sustainable development goals (3.7 and 5.6) give a new impetus to the aspiration of universal access to high-quality SRHR services. Indispensable stakeholders in this process are healthcare practitioners who, through their actions or inactions, determine a population's health choices. Often times, healthcare practitioners' SRHR decisions are rooted in religious and cultural influences. We seek to understand whether religious and cultural influences differ significantly according to individuals' characteristics and work environment. Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the role of healthcare practitioners' individual characteristics and their work environment in predicting normative SRHR attitudes and behaviours (practices). We hypothesized that religion and culture could be significant predictors of SRHR attitudes and practices. Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional study of 115 participants from ten low-income countries attending a capacity-building programme at Lund University Sweden was conducted. Linear regression models were used to assess for the predictive values of different individual characteristics and workplace environment factors for normative SRHR attitudes and SRHR practices. Results: Self-rated SRHR knowledge was the strongest predictor for both normative SRHR attitudes and normative SRHR practices. However, when adjusted for other individual characteristics, self-rated knowledge lost its significant association with SRHR practices, instead normative SRHR attitudes and active knowledge-seeking behaviour independently predicted normative SRHR practices. Contrary to our hypothesis, importance of religion or culture in an individual's life was not correlated with the measured SRHR attitudes and practices. Conclusion: Healthcare practitioners' cultural and religious beliefs, which are often depicted as barriers for implementing full coverage of SRHR services, seem to be modified by active knowledge-seeking behaviour and accumulated working experience with SRHR over time.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Países en Desarrollo , Servicios de Salud Reproductiva/organización & administración , Salud Reproductiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/psicología , Salud Sexual/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Creación de Capacidad , Estudios Transversales , Características Culturales , Ambiente , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Reproductiva/etnología , Servicios de Salud Reproductiva/normas , Salud Sexual/etnología , Normas Sociales
2.
Sex Reprod Health Matters ; 28(2): 1778610, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32530386

RESUMEN

WHO's normative guidance on self-care interventions for sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) promotes comprehensive, integrated and people-centred approaches to health service delivery. Implementation of self-care interventions within the context of human rights, gender equality, and a life course approach, offers an underused opportunity to improve universal health coverage (UHC) for all. Results from an online global values and preferences survey provided lay persons' and healthcare providers' perspectives on access, acceptability, and implementation considerations. This analysis examines 326 qualitative responses to open-ended questions from healthcare providers (n = 242) and lay persons (n = 70) from 77 countries. Participants were mostly women (66.9%) and were from the Africa (34.5%), America (32.5%), South-East Asia (5.6%), European (19.8%), Eastern Mediterranean (4.8%), and Western Pacific regions (2.8%). Participants perceived multiple benefits of self-care interventions for SRHR, including: reduced exposure to stigma, discrimination and access barriers, increased confidentiality, empowerment, self-confidence, and informed decision-making. Concerns include insufficient knowledge, affordability, and possible side-effects. Implementation considerations highlighted the innovative approaches to linkages with health services. Introduction of self-care interventions is a paradigm shift in health care delivery bridging people and communities through primary health care to reach UHC. Self-care interventions can be leveraged by countries as gateways for reaching more people with quality, accessible and equitable services that is critical for achieving UHC. The survey results underscored the urgent need to reduce stigma and discrimination, increase access to and improve knowledge of self-care interventions for SRHR for laypersons and healthcare providers to advance SRHR.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Personal de Salud/psicología , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Servicios de Salud Reproductiva , Autocuidado/psicología , Participación de la Comunidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Reproductiva , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/psicología , Salud Sexual , Estigma Social , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud
3.
Sex Reprod Health Matters ; 28(2): 1772654, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32449504

RESUMEN

The 2030 Sustainable Development Goals committed to "Leave No One Behind" regardless of social identity. While access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services has improved globally, people with disabilities continue to face enormous barriers to SRH, infringing on their SRH rights (SRHR). Uganda adopted pro-disability legislation to promote the rights of people with disabilities. Despite these legal instruments, SRHR of people with disabilities continue to be violated and denied. To address this, we sought to understand and document how people with disabilities perceive the relationships between their use of SRH services, legislation, and health policy in three districts of the post-conflict Northern region of Uganda. Through an intersectionality-informed analysis, we interviewed 32 women and men with different types of impairments (physical, sensory and mental) and conducted two focus groups with 12 hearing and non-hearing disabled people as well as non-participant observations at seven health facilities. We found that disabled people's access to SHR services is shaped by the intersections of gender, disability, and violence, and that individuals with disabilities experienced discrimination across both private-not-for-profit and public health facilities. They also encountered numerous physical, attitudinal, and communication accessibility barriers. Despite policy implementation challenges, people with disabilities expected to exercise their rights and made concrete multi-level recommendations to redress situations of inequity and disadvantages in SRH service utilisation. Intersectionality revealed blind spots in policy implementation and service utilisation gaps. Universal health coverage can be operationalised in actionable measures where its universality meets with social justice.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad/psicología , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/psicología , Estigma Social , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Salud Reproductiva , Salud Sexual , Uganda , Violencia/psicología
4.
BMC Womens Health ; 20(1): 19, 2020 02 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32013966

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Women's empowerment is a process wherein females are afforded power over their own lives as well as their participation in the communities and larger societies to which they belong. An important aspect of such empowerment is the right to make decisions regarding fertility-an entitlement affected by the social health determinants that contribute to the social conditions under which humans live and work throughout their lives. As one such determinant, psychosocial factors play an essential role in the development of women's empowerment. Correspondingly, this study conducted a structural equation modeling of these determinants to examine the empowerment of Iranian women in reproductive decision making. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved 400 women who were referred to clinical centers of the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran, Iran. Data were collected using six questionnaires, namely, demographic, socioeconomic, and social support questionnaires, the Rosenberg self-esteem scale, a marital satisfaction questionnaire, and an empowerment survey. The data were analyzed using SPSS software version 17, and the structural equation modeling was carried out using EQS software version 6.1. RESULTS: The Iranian women had an average level of empowerment with respect to reproductive decision making, and such empowerment was related to all the psychosocial factors examined (p = 0.001). The final model appropriately fit the data (comparative fit index = 0.92, root mean square error of approximation = 0.06). The psychosocial factors served as intermediate social determinants of the women's empowerment in reproductive decision making (ß = 0.78, p = 0.001). This empowerment was indirectly affected by socioeconomic situation as a structural factor (ß = 0.44, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic factors, through the mechanism of psychosocial determinants, may significantly affect women's empowerment in making decisions regarding reproductive health. Conditions associated with these factors should be improved to ensure that women claim and exercise their right to have mastery over their reproductive health.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Empoderamiento , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/psicología , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Derechos de la Mujer , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Irán , Análisis de Clases Latentes , Matrimonio/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Reproductiva , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
5.
Bioethics ; 34(1): 123-134, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31617217

RESUMEN

In vitro gametogenesis (IVG) might offer numerous research and clinical benefits. Some potential clinical applications of IVG, such as allowing opposite-sex couples experiencing infertility to have genetically related children, have attracted support. Others, such as enabling same-sex reproduction and solo reproduction, have attracted significantly more criticism. In this paper, we examine how different ethical principles might help us to draw lines and distinguish between ethically desirable and undesirable uses of IVG. We discuss the alleged distinction between therapeutic and non-therapeutic uses of assisted reproduction in the context of IVG, and show how it is both problematic to apply in practice and theoretically dubious. We then discuss how the ethical principles of reproductive justice and beneficence apply to IVG for opposite-sex reproduction, same-sex reproduction, and solo reproduction. We suggest that these principles generate strong reasons for the use of IVG for opposite-sex and same-sex reproduction, but not for solo reproduction.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Ético , Gametogénesis , Técnicas In Vitro/ética , Técnicas In Vitro/métodos , Padres , Ética Basada en Principios , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/ética , Beneficencia , Familia/psicología , Femenino , Reducción del Daño/ética , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/ética , Humanos , Masculino , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/ética , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/psicología , Riesgo
6.
Int J Law Psychiatry ; 66: 101501, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31706406

RESUMEN

This article explores the vulnerability that is created when legal capacity is denied to women and disabled women. It argues that vulnerability is largely contingent on social constructs - as opposed to being an inherent quality of disability or gender. It discusses barriers to the exercise of legal capacity that women and disabled women experience - such as limitations on reproductive choice, higher rates of substituted decision-making, and unique experiences with forced mental health treatment. It then explores evidence that such barriers are disempowering and can leave women and disabled women vulnerable to abuse and marginalisation. It explores financial, physical and sexual abuse that can occur as a result of this vulnerability. Finally, it concludes that autonomy and power are inextricably linked and can be essential for minimising vulnerability.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Personas con Discapacidad/psicología , Competencia Mental/psicología , Personas con Discapacidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Femenino , Humanos , Competencia Mental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Autonomía Personal , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/psicología , Poblaciones Vulnerables/legislación & jurisprudencia , Poblaciones Vulnerables/psicología
7.
Int J Law Psychiatry ; 66: 101488, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31706408

RESUMEN

Respect for the sexual, reproductive, and relational choices of women with learning disabilities remains unrealised to date, despite the autonomy-based focus of mental capacity law in England and Wales as well as the UN Convention for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Instead, such women appear trapped within a triple-bind - where they not only act in ways that might reinforce oppressive norms around gender and disability, but they are mentally incapable of even making such self-subjugating choices. The triple-bind emerges for two reasons: first, learning disability is understood as an essentialist property that determines action; second, the normative logic of feminism and the social model of disability is bound to the binary between emancipation - subjugation, which excludes the nuanced and ambiguous agency of women with learning disabilities as a result. What is needed instead is an alternative framework of female agency that can accommodate a mode of ambivalence, indifference, inhabitation, and at times, complicity - in other words, instances where women make choices that appear contrary to their emancipation from disabling, patriarchal norms or relationships. Women with learning disabilities navigate a complex nexus of norms, power relations, and relational connections, some of which are coercive and oppressive, yet simultaneously subjectively affirming and enabling. I argue for an alternative analytical framework of female agency in order to accommodate how women with learning disabilities undertake the complex negotiation of power and social norms, as well as render visible their agency in their sexual, relational, and reproductive choices.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Discapacidades para el Aprendizaje , Competencia Mental , Autonomía Personal , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Personas con Discapacidad/psicología , Inglaterra , Femenino , Humanos , Discapacidades para el Aprendizaje/psicología , Competencia Mental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Competencia Mental/psicología , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/psicología , Naciones Unidas , Gales , Salud de la Mujer
8.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 17(1): 154, 2019 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31615524

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although Jordan has made progress in meeting Family Planning (FP) needs in last decades, recently the use of FP methods has declined significantly. Women's personal experiences, knowledge, and perceptions of how a FP method might impact their quality of life (QoL) can influence FP decisions. However, a lack of comprehensive understanding of the impact of modern FP methods on women's QoL continues to exist among Jordanian couples. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between the use of common modern FP methods and QoL among Jordanian women. METHODS: Using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire along with other questions, non-pregnant women of reproductive age were interviewed at their homes through face-to-face structured interviews. Women who visited the obstetrics and gynecology clinic of King Abdullah University Hospital for contraceptive advice and follow-up consultations were also included. RESULTS: A total of 548 women aged between 18 and 49 participated in the study. Based on the WHOQOL-BREF scale, the overall mean (SD) scores of the four domains were found to be average. Our findings show that women who used Intra Uterine Devices (IUDs) and women whose husbands used condoms had better QoL in the four domains (physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment) than those who used Oral Contraceptives (OCs). Women who used implant and injectable hormonal contraceptives had better QoL in terms of the physical health and social relationships domains. In contrast, women who had undergone permanent sterilization had lower QoL scores in all of the four domains. Further analysis revealed that women who had undergone tubal sterilization were less satisfied overall and more likely to experience side effects than women who used OCs. CONCLUSION: The choice to use contraceptives and decide freely whether and when to have children is regarded as a fundamental reproductive health right and is strongly linked to women's health and QoL. Women who use OCs and women who have undergone permanent sterilization are likely to have lower QoL than women who use IUDs or implant and injectable hormones and those whose husbands use condoms.


Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción/psicología , Servicios de Planificación Familiar/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticoncepción/métodos , Anticoncepción/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Servicios de Planificación Familiar/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Jordania , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/psicología , Autoinforme , Salud de la Mujer , Adulto Joven
9.
Sex Reprod Health Matters ; 27(2): 1669338, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31609191

RESUMEN

This article discusses political setbacks related to sexual and reproductive health and rights that have occurred in Brazil in the last 5 years (2014-2018) resulting from the significant role played by Christian (Evangelical and Catholic) parliamentarians in the legislative branch. Political initiatives aimed at prohibiting the affirmation of sexual and reproductive rights, while also curtailing debate about sexuality and gender in schools and universities, have raised "moral panic" within some elements of Brazilian society. The discursive strategies used around so-called "gender ideology" stimulated the formation of civil organisations which promote morality based on right-wing political positions. For this study, we looked at official documents and bibliographic material to examine how issues related to abortion rights, health care in cases of sexual violence, the prevention of sexually transmitted infections and homosexual citizenship are currently being suppressed, compromising the defence and advancement of the sexual and reproductive rights of women and the LGBTI+ population. The results point to the steady weakening of public policies that had become law in the 1980s, a time of Brazilian re-democratisation after two decades of military dictatorship. A wide range of civil, political and social rights, which saw significant growth and consolidation over the last 20 years, were rolled back after the resurgence of the extreme right wing in the federal legislature, culminating in the election of the current president in October 2018. However, social movements have increased in strength in the last few decades, especially the black feminist and LGBTI+ rights movements. These movements continue to provide political resistance, striving to affirm and protect all sexual and reproductive rights achieved to date.


Asunto(s)
Catolicismo/psicología , Principios Morales , Política , Salud Reproductiva/ética , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/ética , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/psicología , Sexualidad/psicología , Adulto , Brasil , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Salud Reproductiva/legislación & jurisprudencia , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/legislación & jurisprudencia
10.
Reprod Health ; 16(1): 155, 2019 Oct 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31665037

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Women's decision-making power regarding reproductive health and rights (RHR) was the central component to achieve reproductive well-being. Literatures agree that a women having higher domestic decision-making power regarding their health care were more likely to utilize health services. More than 80% of women in Ethiopia reside in rural areas where they considered as the subordinates of their husbands. This would restrict women to fully exercise their RHR. Thus, this study aims to determine the factors influencing the women's decision-making power regarding RHR in Mettu rural district, South West Ethiopia. METHODS: A community based cross-sectional study was done among 415 by using randomly selected married women of reproductive age from March to April 2017. Data was entered by using Epi-data manger 1.4 and analyzed by SPSS version 21. Descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out. RESULT: One hundred sixty-eight (41.5%) of the women had greater decision-making power regarding RHR. Woman's primary education AOR 2.62[95% C. I 1.15, 5.97], secondary (9+) education AOR 3.18[95% C. I 1.16, 8.73] and husband's primary education AOR 4.0[95% C. I 1.53, 10.42], secondary (9+) education AOR 3.95 [95% C. I 1.38, 11.26], being knowledgeable about RHR AOR 3.57 [95% C. I 1.58, 8.09], marriage duration of more than 10 years AOR 2.95 [95% C. I 1.19, 7.26], access to micro-credit enterprises AOR 4.26[95% C. I 2.06, 8.80], having gender equitable attitude AOR 6.38 [95% C. I 2.52, 12.45] and good qualities of spousal relation AOR 2.95 [95% C. I 1.30, 6.64] were positively influencing women's decision-making power regarding RHR. CONCLUSION: More than four in ten rural women had greater decision-making power regarding RHR. External pressures (qualities of spousal relation, gender equitable attitude) and knowledge about RHR were found to influence women's decision-making power. Public health interventions targeting women's RHR should take into account strengthening rural micro-credit enterprises, qualities of spousal relations and priority should be given to women with no formal education of husband or herself and marriage duration of < 5 years.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Autonomía Personal , Salud Reproductiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Esposos/psicología , Derechos de la Mujer/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Etiopía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/psicología , Población Rural , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto Joven
11.
Int J Health Policy Manag ; 8(8): 480-487, 2019 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31441288

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Persons living with HIV often face discrimination in safe sex and reproductive choices, especially in lowresource settings. This study assessed fertility desires and intentions, risk perception and correlates of ever use of at least one safer conception method among HIV-infected women attending a tertiary health facility in Kano, Nigeria. METHODS: Structured questionnaires were administered to a cross section of 328 of 427 eligible HIV-infected women. Fertility desires and intentions, risk perception and safer conception practice were analyzed. Logistic regression was employed to assess for predictors. RESULTS: Of the 328 respondents, 150 respondents (45.7%) wanted more children. The proportions of respondents aware of their transmission risk during pregnancy, delivery, and breastfeeding were 69.5%, 75.3%, and 78.9%, respectively. Further, 68.9% of respondents were aware of the prospects of bearing HIV-negative children without infecting their partners. About 64.8% of women were aware of at least one safer conception method. Safer conception methods everused by the participants include: antiretroviral therapy (ART) (36.7%), timed unprotected intercourse with (10.9%), and without pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) (17.2%), intravaginal insemination (7.3%) and intrauterine insemination (4.7%). Safer conception practice was predicted by marital status (married versus single, adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=1.50, 95% CI =1.10-3.55), parity (2-4 versus 0, AOR=12.1, 95% CI=3.7-39.8), occupation (civil servants versus traders, AOR=0.37, 95% CI=0.16-0.86), husband's serostatus (seroconcordant versus serodiscordant) (AOR=1.51, 95% CI=1.13-4.64), couple contraceptive use (users versus non-users) (AOR=1.62, 95% CI=1.16-5.83) and transmission risk perception (high risk versus low/no risk) (AOR=2.14, 95% CI=1.18-3.90). CONCLUSION: We found high levels of fertility desires and intentions and moderate risk perception among a cohort of HIV-infected women in urban Kano, Nigeria. The use of safer conception practices was not common. Our findings underscore the need for healthcare provider capacity building to enhance safer conception counseling and service delivery.


Asunto(s)
Fertilización , Infecciones por VIH/psicología , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/psicología , Parejas Sexuales/psicología , Estigma Social , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Consejo , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/terapia , Heterosexualidad/psicología , Humanos , Nigeria , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición
12.
Rev Esc Enferm USP ; 53: e03464, 2019 Aug 19.
Artículo en Español, Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31433011

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore the social construction of obstetric violence developed by Tenek and Nahuatl women in Mexico. METHOD: Qualitative, socio-critical study conducted through focal groups in which were deepened the childbirth experiences lived in the period 2015-2016. RESULTS: Participation of 57 women. Through discourse analysis, it was identified that participants do not have enough information about obstetric violence and/or sexual and reproductive rights. This makes the association of their negative experiences with the legal term "obstetric violence" impossible. Most of their speeches correspond to the legal denomination of "obstetric violence". Experiences like prolonged fasting or the use of technologies for invading their privacy were narrated like situations they perceive as violent, but have not been incorporated within the legal term. CONCLUSION: Multiple actions against women's human rights take place within delivery rooms. Most remain unidentified by users, since they have not socially constructed the image of obstetric violence. However, that fact does not make them less susceptible to feel attacked and denigrated during their childbirth experiences.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/psicología , Indígenas Norteamericanos/psicología , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Violencia/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Derechos Humanos/psicología , Humanos , México , Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas/etnología , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/psicología , Terminología como Asunto , Violencia/etnología , Adulto Joven
13.
BMC Womens Health ; 19(1): 76, 2019 06 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31200696

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rape, unintended pregnancy, and abortion are among the most controversial and stigmatized topics facing sexual and reproductive health researchers, advocates, and the public today. Over the past three decades, public health practicioners and human rights advocates have made great strides to advance our understanding of sexual and reproductive rights and how they should be protected. The overall aim of the study was to understand young women's personal experiences of unintended pregnancy in the context of Nicaragua's repressive legal and sociocultural landscape. Ten in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted with women ages 16-23 in a city in North Central Nicaragua, from June to July 2014. CASE PRESENTATION: This case study focuses on the story of a 19-year-old Nicaraguan woman who was raped, became pregnant, and almost died from complications resulting from an unsafe abortion. Her case, detailed under the pseudonym Ana Maria, presents unique challenges related to the fulfillment of sexual and reproductive rights due to the restrictive social norms related to sexual health, ubiquitous violence against women (VAW) and the total ban on abortion in Nicaragua. The case also provides a useful lens through which to examine individual sexual and reproductive health (SRH) experiences, particularly those of rape, unintended pregnancy, and unsafe abortion; this in-depth analysis identifies the contextual risk factors that contributed to Ana Maria's experience. CONCLUSIONS: Far too many women experience their sexuality in the context of individual and structural violence. Ana Maria's case provides several important lessons for the realization of sexual and reproductive health and rights in countries with restrictive legal policies and conservative cultural norms around sexuality. Ana Maria's experience demonstrates that an individual's health decisions are not made in isolation, free from the influence of social norms and national laws. We present an overview of the key risk and contextual factors that contributed to Ana Maria's experience of violence, unintended pregnancy, and unsafe abortion.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido/psicología , Violación/psicología , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/psicología , Derechos de la Mujer , Femenino , Humanos , Nicaragua , Embarazo , Embarazo no Planeado/psicología , Salud Reproductiva , Factores de Riesgo , Salud Sexual , Adulto Joven
14.
Med Clin North Am ; 103(4): 751-766, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31078205

RESUMEN

Reproductive rights are essential to the recognition/treatment of women as full-fledged human beings/citizens. Barriers to reproductive rights pose a grave danger to women's well-being. This article explores the origins of these barriers, their nature, and their impact on mental health. The most controversial relationship is between induced abortion and mental health. Barriers, misinformation, and coercion affecting contraceptive, abortion, and pregnancy care are an ongoing danger to women's mental health and the well-being of their families. Mental health professionals are best qualified, and have an obligation, to know the facts, apply them, and provide accurate information to protect women's health.


Asunto(s)
Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud de la Mujer/estadística & datos numéricos , Derechos de la Mujer/estadística & datos numéricos , Aborto Inducido/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Salud Mental , Defensa del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/psicología
15.
Int Health ; 11(6): 536-544, 2019 11 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31028377

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The restriction of reproductive rights of HIV-positive couples in low-resource settings could be related to the attitudes and skills of health workers. We assessed health workers' knowledge of safer conception and their attitudes toward the reproductive rights of HIV-positive couples in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. METHODS: A cross-section of health workers (n=294) was interviewed using structured questionnaires. Knowledge and attitude scores were analyzed. Logistic regression was employed to generate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for predictors of attitude. RESULTS: Safer conception methods mentioned by respondents included timed unprotected intercourse with (27.9%) and without antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (37.4%), in vitro fertilization plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (26.5%), and sperm washing and intrauterine insemination (24.8%). The majority (94.2%) of health workers acknowledged the reproductive rights of HIV-infected persons, although (64.6%) strongly felt that HIV-infected couples should have fewer children. Health workers reported always/nearly always counseling their patients on HIV transmission risks (64.1%) and safer conception (59.2% and 48.3% for females and males, respectively) (p<0.05). Among health workers, being older (30-39 vs <30 y) (AOR=1.33, 95% CI=1.13-2.47), married (AOR=2.15, 95% CI=1.17-5.58) and having a larger HIV-positive daily caseload (20-49 vs <20) (AOR=1.98, 95% CI=1.07-3.64) predicted positive attitude towards reproductive rights of HIV-affected couples. CONCLUSIONS: Health workers had limited knowledge of safer conception methods, but were supportive of the reproductive rights of HIV-positive couples. Health workers in Nigeria require training to effectively counsel couples on their reproductive rights, risks and options.


Asunto(s)
Fertilización , Infecciones por VIH/terapia , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Personal de Hospital/psicología , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/psicología , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Nigeria/epidemiología , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguridad , Centros de Atención Terciaria
16.
Actual. psicol. (Impr.) ; 32(125): 79-93, Jul.-Dez. 2018. graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS, Index Psicología - Revistas, SaludCR | ID: biblio-1088566

RESUMEN

Abstract. Objective. To analyze commercial sex work's social representations among Brazilian women who identify as transvestite or transsexual. Methods: A qualitative study with a descriptive and analytical approach based on the Theoretical Paradigm of Social Representation with a structural approach. The sample group was formed by 100 women who defined themselves as transvestite and transsexual in Santa Catarina, Brazil. The data was gathered from September to December 2016 via a questionnaire using the technique of free association of words, as well as semi-directed interviews. Results: Through both prototypical and content analysis, it was confirmed that the most likely elements that formed the core of the social representation were: violence, drugs, risk, work, sadness, prejudice, and danger. In the objectification/objectivation process of commercial sex work, the image shows a mix between daily activities in the streets - which they consider to be their battlefield - and their own feelings and experiences of vulnerability in other areas of society, starting with families, churches, schools and the like. Conclusions: By experiencing commercial sex work, female transvestite and transsexual individuals reveal how the elements that form the social representation are of paramount importance in the legitimation, legalization, and simplification of their identities.


Resumen. Objetivo:Analizar las representaciones sociales del comercio sexual entre mujeres auto-identificadas como travestis y transexuales en Brasil. Métodos: Estudio cualitativo de naturaleza descriptivo-analítico que, utilizó el Paradigma Teórico de las Representaciones Sociales con abordaje estructural como Referencial Teórico. La muestra fue constituida por 100 mujeres auto-identificadas como travestis y transexuales en Santa Catarina/Brasil. Los datos fueron recolectados de septiembre a diciembre de 2016, por medio de la utilización de un cuestionario auto-administrado que utilizó la técnica de asociación libre de palabras y, por medio de entrevistas semi-directivas. Resultados: A partir del análisis prototípico y de contenido se verificó que los elementos probables que formaron el núcleo central de la representación social fueron: violencia, drogas, riesgo, trabajo, tristeza, prejuicios y peligro. En el proceso de objetificación/objetivación de la prostitución, la imagen refleja un compaso entre sus itinerarios cotidianos en el campo de batalla y los sentimientos y vivencias de vulnerabilidad en los otros espacios institucionales de la sociedad. Conclusiones: la experiencia del comercio sexual de mujeres travestis y transexuales reveló cómo los elementos formadores de la representación social son cruciales en el proceso de legitimación, normatización y simplificación de sus identidades.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Trabajo Sexual/psicología , Conducta Sexual/psicología , Transexualidad/psicología , Travestismo/psicología , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/psicología , Personas Transgénero/psicología , Brasil
17.
Med Anthropol ; 37(8): 688-702, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29693428

RESUMEN

Feminist health care providers have debated the efficacy of the decriminalization of abortion in Mexico City. Luisa, a counselor in a private clinic, suggested that while the law has expanded the visibility of, and access to safe abortion, it has also called forth "other ghosts." In this article, I take Luisa's critical perspective as a starting point for examining ongoing criminalization and moral stigma as forms of haunting that arise in the wake of the Mexico City abortion policy. Drawing on ethnographic research, I explore how Luisa's ghosts materialize in the embodied- affective relations between patients in new legal clinics. Women who attend public clinics negotiate moral stigma along with religious and familial pressures in the ways they suffer, as well as normalize abortion as a painful experience. Rather than approach pain as purely a sign of victimization, I suggest that its expression constitutes an effervescent collectivity between women in the clinic, making explicit, while at the same time dissipating, an intractable moral-affective knot that might otherwise be ignored.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Emociones , Embarazo , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos , Estigma Social , Aborto Inducido/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aborto Inducido/psicología , Antropología Médica , Femenino , Humanos , México/etnología , Principios Morales , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/psicología
18.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 25(6): 974-979, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29501812

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether reproductive endocrinologists and minimally invasive surgeons support uterine transplantation as a treatment option for absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI). DESIGN: A cross-sectional study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: A Web-based survey. PATIENTS: Physician members of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) and the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL). INTERVENTIONS: A Web-based questionnaire administered between January and February 2017. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Support for (strongly agree or agree) or opposition to (strongly disagree or disagree) various aspects of uterine transplantation were described using descriptive statistics and analyzed using chi-square tests. A total of 414 physicians (ASRM: 49.5%, AAGL: 50.5%) responded to the Web-based survey; 43.7% were female, 52.4% were between the ages of 45 and 65 years, and 73.4% were white. Nearly fifty-six percent supported women being allowed to donate or receive a transplanted uterus. Fifty-four percent strongly agreed or agreed that uterine transplantation carried an acceptable risk for donors, 28.0% for the recipient and 21.0% for the infant. Forty-two percent agreed that uterine transplantation should be considered a therapeutic option for women with AUFI, whereas 19.6% felt it should be covered by insurance. Nearly 45% of respondents felt uterine transplantation to be ethical. The most common ethical concerns regarding uterine transplantation were related to medical or surgical complications to the recipient (48.8%). CONCLUSION: Just under half of the reproductive endocrinologists and minimally invasive surgeons surveyed find uterine transplantation to be an ethical option for patients with AUFI. Important concerns remain regarding the risk to donors, recipients, and resulting infants, all contributing to only a minority currently recommending it as a therapeutic option.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Trasplante de Órganos/psicología , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/psicología , Útero/trasplante , Adulto , Anciano , Actitud , Estudios Transversales , Endocrinólogos/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante de Órganos/ética , Percepción , Medicina Reproductiva , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/ética , Cirujanos/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
19.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 25(6): 980-985, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29524724

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the opinions and attitudes of the general public regarding uterine transplantation (UTx) in the United States. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: A Web-based survey. PATIENTS: A nationally representative sample of adult US residents by age and sex. INTERVENTIONS: A Web-based questionnaire administered in November 2016. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Respondents who supported UTx were compared with those who were opposed using log binomial regression to calculate relative risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Of the 1444 respondents recruited, 1337 (93%) completed the survey. Ninety respondents (6%) disagreed with the use of in vitro fertilization for any indication and were excluded. Of the remaining 1247 respondents, 977 (78%) supported and 48 (4%) opposed allowing women to undergo UTx. Respondents with higher yearly incomes and education level were more likely to agree that "taking the uterus from one person and putting it into another person is ethical." Respondents who answered that UTx is safe for the donor, recipient, and baby were more likely to believe that UTx is an acceptable, ethical alternative to a gestational carrier. Forty-five percent of respondents believed that UTx should be covered by insurance, whereas 24% did not. CONCLUSION: The majority of respondents in a sample of US residents support UTx, find it ethical, and believe that it is an acceptable alternative to a gestational carrier although support varies. These findings suggest that the US public is in favor of uterine transplantation as a treatment for uterine factor infertility.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Órganos/psicología , Opinión Pública , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/psicología , Útero/trasplante , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante de Órganos/ética , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/ética , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
20.
Reprod Health Matters ; 26(54): 61-71, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31309870

RESUMEN

This paper explores sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) among young people, identifying intersecting factors that create inequities in access to services, health-seeking behaviour, and ultimately health outcomes. Based on qualitative interviews with young people in the Maldives, it demonstrates how these intersectional experiences are contrary to what is often assumed in official data, policies, and services. Three factors were found to shape young people's experiences: marital status, gender, and urban/rural differences. Non-marital sexual activity is illegal in the Maldives, but it is somewhat expected of unmarried men, while unmarried women are stigmatised for being sexually active. Although access to SRH services is restricted for all unmarried people, young women face additional difficulties, as the risk of being exposed is much greater in small island communities. Maldivian island communities are extremely small and characterised by an inward-looking culture that exerts considerable social pressure, particularly on unmarried women. For an unmarried woman, being known to be sexually active, or worse, pregnant outside of marriage, has severe social consequences including stigma and isolation from the community, and their own family. This concern is more prevalent among rural young women, as they live in smaller communities where stigma is inescapable. The need to avoid public scrutiny and humiliation contributes to making unsafe abortion a common solution for many unintended pregnancies. Failure to acknowledge these intersecting factors in SRHR experience and access has led to inequities among an already overlooked population, shaping their experiences, knowledge, health-seeking behaviour, and health outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Estado Civil/etnología , Salud Reproductiva/etnología , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/psicología , Conducta Sexual/etnología , Adolescente , Femenino , Política de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Islas del Oceano Índico , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Características de la Residencia , Factores Sexuales , Salud Sexual/etnología , Estigma Social , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...