Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 9.313
Filtrar
2.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 45(3): 186-194, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755777

RESUMEN

Background: Concern of metal sensitization in pre- and postsurgical evaluation is growing, with the recent guidelines remaining the criterion standard for consideration of patch testing. Information remains scarce on surgical screening in the groups of patients who reported a history of metal sensitivity versus those with no reported history. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the utility of patch testing in surgical candidates based on reported metal allergy history. The secondary objective was to evaluate the utility and outcomes in postsurgical patch testing. Methods: Nine hundred and thirty-one patient charts of patients with the diagnosis of "contact dermatitis" who underwent an evaluation at a single allergy clinic site between January 2013 and December 2022 were identified and reviewed as part of a retrospective chart review study. Patients were included in subgroups based on the time of patch testing and history of reported metal allergy. Results: In all, 67 patients underwent patch testing, 10 (14.9%) of whom were surgical candidates without a history of metal sensitivity, 31 (46.2%) of whom were surgical candidates with a history of metal sensitivity, and 26 (38.8%) of whom were postsurgical patients. Twenty-nine (43.3%) of patients had positive patch testing results, with only one (10%) in the presurgical group, 17 (54.8%) in the presurgical with a history of metal sensitivity, and 11 (42.3%) in the postsurgical group. Zero patients in our cohort without metal sensitivity who were undergoing the Nuss procedure had positive reactions on patch testing, whereas two of four (50%) with reported metal sensitivity who were undergoing the Nuss procedure had positive relevant metal reactions. Conclusion: Ambiguity in the utility of patch testing for surgical decision making remains, despite common utilization. Recent guidelines along with coordination of care among the surgeon, allergist, and patient remains the criterion standard of care.


Asunto(s)
Metales , Pruebas del Parche , Prótesis e Implantes , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Metales/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prótesis e Implantes/efectos adversos , Adulto , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Anciano , Alérgenos/inmunología
3.
J Nepal Health Res Counc ; 21(3): 467-471, 2024 Mar 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38615219

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis is one of the most common forms of skin diseases that require medical intervention. Appropriate detection of allergens by patch test and accurate avoidance of them is the key to management. The objective of this study is to determine the types and frequency of allergens responsible for Allergic contact dermatitis in a tertiary hospital of Nepal. METHODS: Altogether 120 patients with Allergic contact dermatitis were enrolled in the study. Patch test was performed to find out the most common inciting allergen, utilizing the Indian Standard Series of allergens approved by The Contact and Occupational Dermatoses Forum of India. Results were read at 48 and 96 hours. Grading of the reactions was done based on the criteria of the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Pattern of reactivity of different allergens was assessed. RESULTS: Of all the patients, 63 (53%) showed positivity to at least one allergen. Nickel sulfate was the most frequent sensitizing agent in 22 (18%) cases, followed by Fragrance mix in 11(9%) and Paraphenylenediamine in 7 (6%) cases. Out of all positive results, Grade 1 positivity was seen in 44 (51%), Grade 2 positivity in 41(47%) and only 2 (2%) cases showed Grade 3 positivity. Mercaptobenzothiazole, Balsam of Peru, Nitrofurazone and Wool Alcohol did not show positive results in any of our patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patch testing helps in the treatment, long term remission, and patient counseling for prevention. Larger scale studies are required to know the sensitivity to allergens in Nepalese population.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Humanos , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Nepal/epidemiología , Pruebas del Parche , Personas del Sur de Asia
4.
Toxicol Ind Health ; 40(6): 306-311, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38575135

RESUMEN

Rinse-off cosmetic products, primarily shampoos, are frequently implicated in the onset of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) caused by alkyl glucosides (AGs). AGs are increasingly popular surfactants and known contact allergens. Glucoside-induced ACD was most frequently observed with shampoos and skin-cleansing products in both consumer and occupational settings. Thereby, studies have shown that atopic individuals are the most susceptible to ACD. Also, several investigations have indicated that individuals with sensitive skin might be more prone to skin allergies. This is why the presence of AGs was investigated in shampoos and body cleansers marketed as hypoallergenic or for sensitive skin. For this purpose, the website of Amazon.com was surveyed. Four groups of cosmetics were obtained by using the following keywords: "hypoallergenic shampoo for adults," "sensitive skin shampoo for adults," "hypoallergenic body cleanser for adults," and "sensitive skin body cleanser for adults." The first 30 best-selling cosmetics in each group were investigated for the presence of AGs, by analyzing the product information pages. The results showed that as much as 56.7% of hypoallergenic shampoos contained AGs, as ingredients, whereas the percentage was somewhat lower for other product categories. Even though decyl and lauryl glucoside were nearly ubiquitously used AGs in cosmetics over the past decade, the most commonly present AG in our analysis was coco-glucoside. The results of this study indicated a necessity to include coco-glucoside in the baseline series of patch testing allergens. Industry, regulators, and healthcare providers should be made aware of the frequent presence of AGs in rinse-off cosmetic products marketed as hypoallergenic or for sensitive skin to ensure the safety and well-being of consumers and patients.


Asunto(s)
Cosméticos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Glucósidos , Glucósidos/análisis , Humanos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Cosméticos/efectos adversos , Cosméticos/química , Alérgenos/análisis , Preparaciones para el Cabello/efectos adversos , Preparaciones para el Cabello/química , Piel/efectos de los fármacos
5.
Cutis ; 113(3): 119-122, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38648590

RESUMEN

Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is an increasingly common diagnosis, especially in middle-aged women, and has garnered growing attention in the scientific literature. This variant of lichen planopilaris (LPP) is recognized as a progressive scarring alopecia affecting the frontal and temporal regions of the scalp as well as the eyebrows and occasionally other sites. Although its precise etiology remains elusive, various factors such as genetics, medications, hormonal influences, and environmental exposures-including specific chemicals present in sunscreens-have been implicated in its pathogenesis but without evidence of causality. The potential relationship between contact allergy and FFA has been explored, with some suggesting an increased prevalence of contact allergy among patients diagnosed with FFA. This article aims to explore the potential association between contact allergy and FFA, focusing on the current published literature and implicated allergens.


Asunto(s)
Alopecia , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Liquen Plano , Humanos , Alopecia/etiología , Alopecia/diagnóstico , Alopecia/patología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Liquen Plano/diagnóstico , Liquen Plano/etiología , Femenino
6.
Arch Toxicol ; 98(5): 1253-1269, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38483583

RESUMEN

Since the 1940s, patch tests in healthy volunteers (Human Predictive Patch Tests, HPPTs) have been used to identify chemicals that cause skin sensitization in humans. Recently, we reported the results of a major curation effort to support the development of OECD Guideline 497 on Defined Approaches (DAs) for skin sensitization (OECD in Guideline No. 497: Defined Approaches on Skin Sensitisation, 2021a. https://doi.org/10.1787/b92879a4-en ). In the course of this work, we compiled and published a database of 2277 HPPT results for 1366 unique test substances (Strickland et al. in Arch Toxicol 97:2825-2837, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-023-03530-3 ). Here we report a detailed analysis of the value of HPPT data for classification of chemicals as skin sensitizers under the United Nations' Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). As a result, we propose the dose per skin area (DSA) used for classification by the GHS to be replaced by or complemented with a dose descriptor that may better reflect sensitization incidence [e.g., the DSA causing induction of sensitization in one individual (DSA1+) or the DSA leading to an incidence of induction in 5% of the tested individuals (DSA05)]. We also propose standardized concepts and workflows for assessing individual HPPT results, for integrating multiple HPPT results and for using them in concert with Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) data in a weight of evidence (WoE) assessment. Overall, our findings show that HPPT results are often not sufficient for deriving unambiguous classifications on their own. However, where they are, the resulting classifications are reliable and reproducible and can be integrated well with those from other skin sensitization data, such as the LLNA.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Humanos , Pruebas del Parche , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Alérgenos/toxicidad , Piel , Ensayo del Nódulo Linfático Local
9.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 104: adv19676, 2024 Mar 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551376

RESUMEN

Allergic contact dermatitis is reported among individuals using continuous glucose monitoring systems and insulin pumps. The aim of this study was to describe contact allergy patterns for allergens in the Swedish baseline series and medical device-related allergens among users. Contact allergy to baseline series allergens and isobornyl acrylate was compared between diabetes patients and dermatitis patients patch-tested at the Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology during 2017 to 2020. Fifty- four diabetes patients and 2,567 dermatitis patients were included. The prevalence of contact allergy to fragrance mix II and sesquiterpene lactone mix was significantly higher in diabetes patients compared with dermatitis patients. Of the diabetes patients 13.0% and of the dermatitis patients 0.5% tested positive to sesquiterpene lactone mix (p < 0.001). Of the diabetes patients 7.4% and of the dermatitis patients 2.3% tested positive to fragrance mix II (p = 0.041). Of the diabetes patients 70.4% tested positive to medical device-related allergens. Of the diabetes patients 63.0% and of the dermatitis patients 0.2% were allergic to isobornyl acrylate (p < 0.001). In conclusion, not only medical device-related contact allergies, but also contact allergy to baseline series allergens (fragrance mix II and sesquiterpene lactone mix), is overrepresented in diabetes patients who use medical devices.


Asunto(s)
Acrilatos , Canfanos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Diabetes Mellitus , Sesquiterpenos , Humanos , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Suecia/epidemiología , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Glucemia , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Pruebas del Parche , Lactonas
14.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(6): 574-584, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38501375

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Professional ice hockey players may contract irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. AIMS: To investigate the presence of contact allergy (CA) in professional ice hockey players in Sweden. METHODS: Ten teams from the two top leagues were assessed for potential occupational exposure to sensitizers. Exactly 107 players were patch tested with an extended baseline series and a working series, in total 74 test preparations. The CA rates were compared between the ice hockey players and controls from the general population and dermatitis patients. RESULTS: One out of 4 players had at least one contact allergy. The most common sensitizers were Amerchol L 101, nickel and oxidized limonene. CA was as common in the ice hockey players as in dermatitis patients and significantly more common than in the general population. Fragrances and combined sensitizers in cosmetic products (fragrances + preservatives + emulsifier) were significantly more common in ice hockey players compared with the general population. CONCLUSION: The possible relationship between CA to fragrances and cosmetic products on the one hand and the presence of dermatitis on the other should be explored further.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Hockey , Pruebas del Parche , Humanos , Suecia/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Adulto , Masculino , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Níquel/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Cosméticos/efectos adversos , Perfumes/efectos adversos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Persona de Mediana Edad , Limoneno/efectos adversos
15.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 149: 105597, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38460723

RESUMEN

Development of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) capable of providing a No Expected Sensitization Induction Level (NESIL) value remains a high priority for the fragrance industry for conducting a Quantitative Risk Assesment (QRA) to evaluate dermal sensitization. The in vitro GARDskin assay was recently adopted by the OECD (TG 442E) for the hazard identification of skin sensitizers. Continuous potency predictions are derived using a modified protocol that incorporates dose-response measurements. Linear regression models have been developed to predict human NESIL values. The aim of the study was to evaluate the precision and reproducibility of the continuous potency predictions from the GARDskin Dose-Response (DR) assay and its application in conducting QRA for fragrance materials using a Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA) framework. Results indicated that the GARDskin Dose-Response model predicted human NESIL values with a good degree of concordance with published NESIL values, which were also reproducible in 3 separate experiments. Using Isocyclocitral as an example, a QRA was conducted to determine its safe use levels in different consumer product types using a NGRA framework. This study represents a major step towards the establishment of the assay to derive NESIL values for conducting QRA evaluations for fragrance materials using a NGRA framework.


Asunto(s)
Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Perfumes , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Humanos , Perfumes/toxicidad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Animales , Bioensayo/métodos
16.
Cutis ; 113(1): 35-42, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38478935

RESUMEN

The differential diagnosis of dermatoses in the axillae is broad. Contact dermatitis-both irritant and allergic-represents common etiologies. Axillary contact dermatitis can develop following exposure to a variety of irritants and/or allergens. Frequently implicated sources include deodorants, antiperspirants, detergents, soaps, and clothing. Fragrance, a ubiquitous ingredient within these products, as well as metals and dyes, are common causes of contact dermatitis. Clinical assessment, bedside diagnostic techniques, histopathology, and patch testing can aid in the diagnosis and help inform management directions.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Irritante , Humanos , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/terapia , Pruebas del Parche , Dermatitis Irritante/etiología , Diagnóstico Diferencial
17.
Cutis ; 113(1): E11-E14, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38478942

RESUMEN

"Leaves of three, leave it be" serves as an apt caution for avoiding poison ivy (Toxicodendron species) and its dermatitis-inducing sap. Toxicodendron contact dermatitis (TCD) poses a notable burden to the American health care system by accounting for half a million reported cases of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) annually. Identifying and avoiding physical contact with the western poison ivy (Toxicodendron rydbergii) plant prevails as the chief method of preventing TCD. This article discusses common features of T rydbergii as well as clinical manifestations and treatment options following exposure to this allergenic plant.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis por Toxicodendron , Toxicodendron , Humanos , Dermatitis por Toxicodendron/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Alérgenos
18.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 115(4): T331-T340, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38331170

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The epidemiological surveillance of contact dermatitis is one of the objectives of the Spanish Registry of Research in Contact Dermatitis and Cutaneous Allergy. Knowing whether the prevalence of positive tests to the different allergens changes over time is important for this monitoring process. OBJECTIVES: To describe the various temporary trends in allergen positivity in the GEIDAC standard series from 2018 through December 31, 2022. METHODS: This was a multicenter, observational trial of consecutive patients analyzed via patch tests as part of the study of possible allergic contact dermatitises collected prospectively within the Spanish Registry of Research in Contact Dermatitis and Cutaneous Allergy. The data was analyzed using 2 statistical tests: one homogeneity test (to describe the changes seen over time) and one trend test (to see whether the changes described followed a linear trend). RESULTS: A total of 11327 patients were included in the study. Overall, the allergens associated with a highest sensitization were nickel sulfate, methylisothiazolinone, cobalt chloride, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone, and fragrance mix i. A statistically significant decrease was found in the percentage of methylisothiazolinone positive tests across the study years with an orderly trend. CONCLUSIONS: Although various changes were seen in the sensitizations trends to several allergens of the standard testing, it became obvious that a high sensitization to nickel, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone and fragrances mix i remained. Only a significant downward trend was seen for methylisothiazolinone.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Atópica , Humanos , Alérgenos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Pruebas del Parche , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tiazoles
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...