Efficacy and safety of narrowband ultraviolet B versus combined ultraviolet A/narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy in the treatment of chronic atopic dermatitis: A randomised double-blind study.

Phototherapy is a useful treatment modality for atopic dermatitis (AD). This is a prospective randomised double-blind study comparing the clinical efficacy of combined ultraviolet-A (UVA)/narrowband ultraviolet-B (NBUVB) versus NBUVB phototherapy in the treatment of chronic AD. Patients with moderate-to-severe AD were randomised to receive either UVA/NBUVB or NBUVB phototherapy twice weekly over 12 weeks. At baseline, weeks 6 and 12, Eczema Area And Severity Index (EASI), itch score and adverse effects were assessed. At baseline and week 12, disease-related quality of life was evaluated using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Nine patients were randomised to receive UVA/NBUVB and 10 received NBUVB. At week 12, both groups showed significant improvement in EASI and itch scores (p < 0.05). Significant improvement in DLQI was seen in the UVA/NBUVB arm (p = 0.009) with a trend towards improvement in the NBUVB arm (p = 0.11). The efficacy of both modalities were comparable, as were reported adverse effects aside from skin dryness which was higher in the NBUVB arm (40% vs. 0%, p = 0.033). Combined UVA/NBUVB and NBUVB phototherapy have comparable clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of chronic AD. NBUVB may induce greater skin dryness.

Narrowband-ultraviolet B vs Broadband-ultraviolet B in Treatment of Chronic Pruritus: A Randomized, Single-blinded, Non-inferiority Study.

Narrowband-ultraviolet B has shown increased efficacy over broadband-ultraviolet B in pruritic skin diseases, such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. In patients with chronic pruritus, e.g. in end-stage renal disease, broadband-ultraviolet B is recommended, but narrowband-ultraviolet B has also shown efficacy in reducing pruritus. This randomized, single blinded, non-inferiority study investigated the effects of narrowband-ultraviolet B compared with broadband-ultraviolet B. Patients with chronic pruritus were treated with either broadband- or narrowband-UVB 3 times a week for 6 weeks and clinical response was monitored. Pruritus, sleep disturbance, and the patients' subjective overall response to treatment were evaluated by the patients on a visual analogue scale (0-10). Skin excoriations were evaluated by investigators on a 4-point scale (0-3). Both phototherapeutic modalities showed significant antipruritic activity (itch reduction 48% and 66.4%, respectively) by broadband-ultraviolet B and narrowband-ultraviolet B. Narrowband-ultraviolet B proved to be not inferior to broadband-ultraviolet B in treating pruritus in patients with chronic pruritus, assuming a 20% non-inferiority margin.

Ultraviolet B phototherapy does not increase the risk of skin cancer among patients with atopic dermatitis: A population-based retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: UV-B phototherapy is a common treatment modality for patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), but its long-term safety in terms of cutaneous carcinogenic risk has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk of skin cancer among patients with AD receiving UV-B phototherapy. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study from 2001 to 2018 to estimate the risk of UV-B phototherapy for skin cancer, nonmelanoma skin cancer, and cutaneous melanoma in patients with AD. RESULTS: Among 6205 patients with AD, the risks of skin cancer (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.35-2.35), nonmelanoma skin cancer (adjusted HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.29-2.26), and cutaneous melanoma (adjusted HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.08-7.64) did not increase among patients with AD treated with UV-B phototherapy, compared with those who did not receive UV-B phototherapy. Additionally, the number of UV-B phototherapy sessions was not associated with an increased risk of skin cancer (adjusted HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.96-1.02), nonmelanoma skin cancer (adjusted HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.96-1.03), or cutaneous melanoma (adjusted HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.77-1.15). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study. CONCLUSION: Neither UV-B phototherapy nor the number of UV-B phototherapy sessions was associated with an increased risk of skin cancers among patients with AD.

Systematic review and estimated cost-efficacy of biologics compared with narrowband ultraviolet B light for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis and atopic dermatitis.

Psoriasis and atopic dermatitis are chronic inflammatory skin conditions, each affecting about 2-3% of the United States adult population. Phototherapy, such as narrowband ultraviolet-B (NB-UVB) therapy have been employed for the treatment of both psoriasis and atopic dermatitis for decades. More recently, systemic biologics have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), representing a great advancement in dermatology. No comprehensive study to date has compared the cost efficacy of phototherapy compared to FDA-approved biologics for the treatment of psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. We pursued a systematic review of the literature for studies assessing efficacy of NB-UVB or biologics with endpoints including the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI). Thirty-four studies including 55 treatment regimens and 5,123 patients were included in the analysis. Phototherapy costs were estimated with Medicare fee schedules for phototherapy-related current procedural terminology code (CPT), and biologic costs were estimated with wholesale acquisition cost (WAC). Total costs to achieve PASI 75 or EASI 75 in each study were standardized to a single month, the "adjusted cost," and exploited to a year, the "effective yearly cost," allowing direct cost-efficacy comparison despite different durations of treatment described in studies. The psoriasis analysis found NB-UVB to be the most cost-effective therapy, with an adjusted monthly cost of $1714.00 per PASI 75. Infliximab was the least expensive biologic, with an adjusted monthly cost of $2076.00 to $2502.00 per PASI 75. For atopic dermatitis, no NB-UVB studies utilized EASI 75 as their outcome measure, hindering the ability to directly compare cost effectiveness for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. However, all NB-UVB studies depicted a reduced treatment cost per treatment period compared to studies assessing biologics, although this comparison does not account for efficacy. The results depict NB-UVB to be the most cost effective for the treatment of psoriasis and the least expensive per treatment period for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. However, certain factors need to be taken into account. Biologics may be more effective for more severe disease, do not require multiple weekly clinic visits, and the ease for patient compliance may lead some to favor biologic therapy. This study is necessary to allow physicians, patients, and health systems to make informed decisions regarding cost-efficacy for a variety of treatment options.

[Narrow-band medium-wave ultraviolet therapy in patients with atopic dermatitis: efficacy and safety]. / Uzkopolosnaya srednevolnovaya ul'trafioletovaya terapiya bol'nykh atopicheskim dermatitom: effektivnost' i bezopasnost'.

For the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis of moderate and heavy severity level, narrow-band medium-wave ultraviolet therapy (narrow-band phototherapy) can be used. An analysis of the results of studies of the efficacy and safety of narrow-band medium-wavelength ultraviolet therapy in patients with atopic dermatitis is presented, and a characteristic of the regimens of the phototherapy carried out is given. It has been shown that narrow-band phototherapy is an effective and safe method of treating patients with atopic dermatitis, but its effectiveness varies widely. Data were obtained on the absence of an increase in the effect during therapy with higher doses of radiation, about the higher efficiency of narrow-band phototherapy with concurrent medication, with an increase in the number of irradiation procedures, as well as in patients with a higher minimum erythemal dose, which indicates the possible existence of factors characterizing the individual characteristics of the response of patients to narrow-band phototherapy.

Long-Term Narrowband UV-B Efficacy in Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Narrowband (NB) UV-B is known as an effective and safe treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD). However, there is a lack of studies regarding prognostic factors for favorable response and its duration. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of NB-UV-B for AD, in a large cohort and "real-life" setting. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study based on the medical records of patients with moderate to severe AD treated with NB-UV-B therapy between 2000 and 2017 with a long-term follow-up (≥3 years) after completing therapy. RESULTS: A total of 390 of 555 AD patients who were scheduled for NB-UV-B were included; among them, 55.4% responded well to treatment. Facial involvement, presence of adverse effects, lower number of treatments, and pretreatment immunoglobulin E levels greater than 4000 were related to poorer response. There was an overall median response duration of 12 months with a greater relapse rate among the patients younger than 18 years. CONCLUSIONS: Narrowband UV-B phototherapy shows high and long-lasting efficacy in AD. Patients with facial involvement and patients with high immunoglobulin E levels respond less to treatment. Response duration seems to be shorter for patients younger than 18 years.

Phototherapy for atopic dermatitis: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Phototherapies could represent an efficient option for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD), but the evidences available for clinical choices were contradictory. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different phototherapies on AD. METHODS: This systematic review and network meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through searching keywords from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library. We summarized different phototherapy types and scoring systems. Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) absolute score changes were estimated by mean differences (MDs) and standard deviations (SDs) and then included in the network meta-analysis. The effect sizes of comparison of different phototherapies were presented as MDs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Egger's test was used to evaluate publication bias. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs were included in the systematic review and 4 studies in the network meta-analysis. Based on the pooled estimates, medium-dose ultraviolet A1 (UVA1) cold light was superior to medium-dose UVA1 (MD 8.92; 95% CI: 5.60-12.24) but no significant difference between high-dose (UVA1) and medium-dose UVA1 cold light (MD 0.66; 95% CI: -5.57 to 6.90). Publication bias was not supported by Egger's test (P = .168). CONCLUSIONS: Due to possible long-term adverse effects of high-dose UVA1, medium-dose UVA1 cold light appears to be the superior form for AD.

Shifts in the Skin Microbiota after UVB Treatment in Adult Atopic Dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology in atopic dermatitis (AD) is not fully understood, but immune dysfunction, skin barrier defects, and alterations of the skin microbiota are thought to play important roles. AD skin is frequently colonized with Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and microbial diversity on lesional skin (LS) is reduced compared to on healthy skin. Treatment with narrow-band ultraviolet B (nb-UVB) leads to clinical improvement of the eczema and reduced abundance of S. aureus. However, in-depth knowledge of the temporal dynamics of the skin microbiota in AD in response to nb-UVB treatment is lacking and could provide important clues to decipher whether the microbial changes are primary drivers of the disease, or secondary to the inflammatory process. OBJECTIVES: To map the temporal shifts in the microbiota of the skin, nose, and throat in adult AD patients after nb-UVB treatment. METHODS: Skin swabs were taken from lesional AD skin (n = 16) before and after 3 treatments of nb-UVB, and after 6-8 weeks of full-body treatment. We also obtained samples from non-lesional skin (NLS) and from the nose and throat. All samples were characterized by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. RESULTS: We observed shifts towards higher diversity in the microbiota of lesional AD skin after 6-8 weeks of treatment, while the microbiota of NLS and of the nose/throat remained unchanged. After only 3 treatments with nb-UVB, there were no significant changes in the microbiota. CONCLUSION: Nb-UVB induces changes in the skin microbiota towards higher diversity, but the microbiota of the nose and throat are not altered.

Narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy is associated with a reduction in topical corticosteroid and clinical improvement in atopic dermatitis: a historical inception cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Despite decades of use, the magnitude of efficacy of narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy for atopic dermatitis (AD) beyond industry-sponsored trials remains unclear. AIM: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of NB-UVB in AD under real-world conditions. METHODS: We conducted a historical inception cohort study using automated recording of dispensed drugs to provide an objective treatment outcome in a large population catchment of 420 000 people over 15 years. We analysed clinical treatment outcomes, recorded multicentre and prospectively over 15 years, of a large AD treatment cohort (n = 844), along with the drugs dispensed to this cohort. RESULTS: The majority (70%) of patients with AD received significantly fewer topical corticosteroids (TCS) during the 12-month window after finishing NB-UVB compared with the 12-month window before starting the treatment (median reduction from 37.5 to 19.7 g/month). The number of patients dispensed with oral corticosteroids and antihistamines also dropped significantly (from 20% to 10% and from 69% to 31%, respectively), while all AD-unrelated drugs dispensed remained unchanged. Clinically, NB-UVB treatment achieved a 'clear' or 'almost clear' status in 48.7% of patients, while 20.4% achieved 'moderate clearance'. Treatment outcomes scores were validated by a strong correlation with reduction in AD-specific drug treatment. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm the significant efficacy of NB-UVB for AD under conditions of routine care.

A Short Cycle of Narrow-Band UVB Phototherapy in the Early Phase of Dupilumab Therapy Can Provide a Quicker Improvement of Severe Atopic Dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Since the best clinical response to dupilumab is achieved after 12-16 weeks, a combination therapy at the beginning of the treatment could be a helpful strategy to reach a faster response in patients with severe atopic dermatitis (AD). OBJECTIVES: To quantify the benefit of a combination of dupilumab treatment with a short course of narrow-band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy. METHODS: In the present pilot study adult patients suffering from severe AD were enrolled with a 2:1 ratio to receive treatment with dupilumab alone or dupilumab plus NB-UVB phototherapy, for 12 weeks. After the twelfth week, all patients received dupilumab only. A follow-up visit took place after 16 weeks. Both clinician-oriented and patient-oriented scores were assessed at baseline (T0) and after 4 (T1), 12 (T2) and 16 (T3) weeks. RESULTS: Forty-five adult patients were enrolled in the study. Both treatment regimens were well tolerated and very effective on all measured scores (EASI, SCORAD, BSA, NRS of itching, NRS of sleep loss, DLQI, POEM and HADS), but the combined regimen led to a more robust clinical improvement of lesions and relief of symptoms after 4 weeks. However, after 12 and 16 weeks, the additional therapeutic effect of phototherapy weakened. CONCLUSION: NB-UVB phototherapy can provide a faster remission of severe AD in the first few weeks of dupilumab therapy.

Early transcriptional changes after UVB treatment in atopic dermatitis include inverse regulation of IL-36γ and IL-37.

Phototherapy with narrow-band Ultraviolet B (nb-UVB) is a major therapeutic option in atopic dermatitis (AD), yet knowledge of the early molecular responses to this treatment is lacking. The objective of this study was to map the early transcriptional changes in AD skin in response to nb-UVB treatment. Adult patients (n = 16) with AD were included in the study and scored with validated scoring tools. AD skin was irradiated with local nb-UVB on day 0, 2 and 4. Skin biopsies were taken before and after treatment (day 0 and 7) and analysed for genome-wide modulation of transcription. When examining the early response after three local UVB treatments, gene expression analysis revealed 77 significantly modulated transcripts (30 down- and 47 upregulated). Among them were transcripts related to the inflammatory response, melanin synthesis, keratinization and epidermal structure. Interestingly, the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-36γ was reduced after treatment, while the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-37 increased after treatment with nb-UVB. There was also a modulation of several other mediators involved in inflammation, among them defensins and S100 proteins. This is the first study of early transcriptomic changes in AD skin in response to nb-UVB. We reveal robust modulation of a small group of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory targets, including the IL-1 family members IL36γ and IL-37, which is evident before any detectable changes in skin morphology or immune cell infiltrates. These findings provide important clues to the molecular mechanisms behind the treatment response and shed light on new potential treatment targets.

Fototerapia ultravioleta B de banda estrecha en pacientes con dermatitis atópica: estudio en un hospital de tercer nivel: estudio retrospectivo y observacional / Narrowband UV-B Phototherapy in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: A Retrospective Observational Study in a Tertiary Hospital

No disponible

The effectiveness of high-dose ultraviolet A-1 phototherapy for acute exacerbation of atopic dermatitis in Asians.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin disease characterized by a chronic course of exacerbations and remissions. High-dose ultraviolet A-1 (UVA-1) phototherapy has been effective in the treatment of acute exacerbations of AD. However, there have been no case studies in Asian patients to date. We investigated the effectiveness of high-dose UVA-1 phototherapy for treating acute exacerbation of AD in Asian patients. METHOD: This study included 16 patients with acute exacerbation of AD. High-dose (100 J/cm2 ) regimens of UVA-1 therapy were employed. Therapeutic effectiveness was assessed based on the findings of clinical examinations and scoring of AD (SCORAD) index before treatment and after the 5th and 10th sessions of treatment. Additionally, side effects and recurrence during follow-up were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: The patients were between 7 and 50 years of age, with a mean age of 25.8 years. The SCORAD index was between 41 and 89.5, with a mean score of 64.9. Among the 16 patients, two patients discontinued treatment due to the aggravation of erythema and pruritus. Of the 14 patients who completed the 10 sessions of high-dose UVA-1 phototherapy, nine patients (64.3%) showed complete remission and five patients (35.7%) showed partial remission. The mean SCORAD index reduced from 64.9 (before treatment) to 23.3 (after the 10th session of treatment). CONCLUSION: This is the first case study of high-dose UVA-1 phototherapy for acute exacerbation of AD in Asian patients, suggesting that high-dose UVA-1 phototherapy can be a well-tolerated and effective treatment for acute exacerbated AD. Future large-scale prospective studies are needed.

Real-world experience of dupilumab treatment for atopic dermatitis in adults: a retrospective analysis of patients' records.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trial data for dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody against the interleukin-4 receptor (IL-4Rα), have shown that it is safe and effective for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in patients whose disease is resistant to other therapies. However, little real-world experience with dupilumab use has been reported thus far. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess overall outcomes in adult patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) treated with dupilumab. METHODS: A retrospective review of electronic medical records was conducted for patients treated with dupilumab in the Department of Dermatology at the University of California, Irvine. RESULTS: We analyzed the medical records of 77 AD patients who received dupilumab according to standard dosing and had at least one documented follow-up visit. In 66 patients (86%), dupilumab improved clinical disease severity, with 23 patients (30%) experiencing complete clearance on dupilumab. Dupilumab was generally well-tolerated and caused no serious adverse events. The most common side effects included dry eyes, conjunctivitis, and keratitis. The most common reason for discontinuation of treatment was lack of substantial clinical improvement or progression of disease severity, followed by ophthalmologic side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, dupilumab was well-tolerated and resulted in clinical improvement in our patient population. These results provide additional important information on the safety and utility of dupilumab treatment for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in the real-world clinical setting.

Effects of 308 nm excimer light treatment on the skin microbiome of atopic dermatitis patients.

BACKGROUND: The skin microbiome has been implicated in the pathophysiology of atopic dermatitis (AD). Although 308 nm excimer light treatment is an effective phototherapy for AD, its effects on the skin microbiome currently remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated the effects of the excimer light treatment on the skin bacterial and fungal microbiome of lesional skin of AD. METHODS: Swab samples were collected from 11 healthy controls, non-lesional and lesional skin of 11 AD patients. The excimer light treatment was administered to the lesional skin. The composition of the skin microbiome, the clinical score and skin barrier function of the lesional skin were examined before and after the treatment. The composition of the skin microbiome was determined by sequencing bacterial 16S and fungal internal transcribed spacer regions. RESULTS: The excimer light treatment significantly changed the composition of the bacterial microbiome in the lesional skin of AD, as well as improved the clinical score and skin barrier function. The treatment increased the relative abundance of the phylum Cyanobacteria and decreased that of the phylum Bacteroidetes in lesional skin. At the species level, the treatment significantly decreased the relative abundance of Staphylococcus aureus (S aureus) in lesional skin. There was also a significant correlation between the reduction of S aureus and improvement of the clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that alterations of the skin microbiome with excimer light treatment, specifically the decrease in the abundance of S aureus, are partly involved in the improvement of AD lesions.

Adherence to a novel home phototherapy system with integrated features.

OBJECTIVE: To measure adherence using a novel home UVB phototherapy system designed to promote adherence. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, observational study conducted to evaluate patients' adherence to a prescribed three-times-per-week treatment protocol using a novel home phototherapy system with integrated features designed to improve adherence. METHODS: Data was collected from 18 psoriasis patients, 27 vitiligo patients, and three atopic dermatitis patients using a novel home phototherapy system under normal use conditions. Adherence was also calculated using two alternative methods to allow for comparison between published phototherapy adherence studies. RESULTS: The median patient adherence (N= 48) to treatment with the home phototherapy system was 80%. There were no significant differences in adherence between different ages, genders, or diseases (P>0.05). Early adherence (N=48) to the home phototherapy system was 90% and dichotomous adherence (N=32) was 71%. CONCLUSIONS: By implementing a smartphone application and web-based portal with the home phototherapy system, patients have multiple mechanisms in place to ensure adherence.

What's new in atopic eczema? An analysis of systematic reviews published in 2016. Part 1: treatment and prevention.

This review is part of a series of annual updates summarizing the evidence base for atopic eczema (AE). It provides a summary of key findings from 28 systematic reviews that were published or indexed during 2016 with a focus on treatment and prevention of AE. There is reasonable evidence of benefit for topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, a glycyrrhetinic acid-containing preparation (Atopiclair® ), oral ciclosporin, oral azathioprine, narrowband ultraviolet B radiation and education programmes. Overall, there is evidence that topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors have similar efficacy and that both can prevent AE flares when used twice weekly as maintenance therapy. However, topical calcineurin inhibitors are costlier and have more adverse reactions, thus topical corticosteroids should remain the standard of care for patients with AE. There is no evidence that multiple applications are better than once-daily application of topical corticosteroid. There is inconsistent evidence to support omalizumab and specific allergen immunotherapy use in AE. There is some evidence that vitamin D supplementation and synbiotics reduce AE severity, although the margin of improvement may not be clinically meaningful. There is little evidence to support the use of wet wraps or of complementary/alternative medicine (including Chinese herbal medicine). There is some evidence to suggest that a diet high in fish in infancy may be preventative for AE, but other dietary interventions for the prevention of AE show little promise. This review provides a succinct guide for clinicians and patients wishing to remain up to date with the latest evidence for the treatment and prevention of AE.

'High dose' vs. 'medium dose' UVA1 phototherapy in italian patients with severe atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: The current evidences attest UVA1 phototherapy as effective in the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Furthermore, in this indication, 'medium dose' is as effective as 'high dose' regimen. To date, a randomized comparison study evaluating the effectiveness as well as safety of different UVA1 protocols in different skin types in the treatment of adult patients with severe AD is still lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare the safety and the efficacy of medium and high dose UVA1 either in fair or in dark skin types. METHODS: Twenty-seven adult patients with severe AD were consecutively included in a randomized, controlled, open, two arms trial Severity of AD was determined by means of SCORAD index and clinical improvement was also monitored. A total of 13 out of 27 patients were treated with high dose (130 J/cm2 ) UVA1 protocol while 14 out of 27 patients received medium dose (60 J/cm2 ) UVA1 protocol. Phototherapy was performed five times weekly up to 3 weeks. Before and after UVA1 treatment each patient was evaluated for skin pigmentation through Melanin Index (MI) quantitative evaluation. RESULTS: Skin status improved in all patients resulting in a reduction of SCORAD index in all groups. Our results demonstrated that among patients with darker skin types and higher MI, high dose UVA1 was significantly more effective than medium dose (P < 0.0001) while within the groups with skin type II, no significant differences between high and medium dose protocols were observed. CONCLUSION: Our study, confirms previous observations that UVA1 phototherapy should be considered among the first approaches in the treatment of patients with severe generalized AD and also demonstrates that in darker skin types, high dose UVA1 phototherapy is more effective than medium dose in the treatment of adult patients with severe AD.