Covariation of fetal skull and maternal pelvis during the perinatal period in rhesus macaques and evolution of childbirth in primates.

A large brain combined with an upright posture in humans has resulted in a high cephalopelvic proportion and frequently obstructed labor. Fischer and Mitteroecker [B. Fischer, P. Mitteroecker, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 5655-5660 (2015)] proposed that the morphological covariations between the skull and pelvis could have evolved to ameliorate obstructed labor in humans. The availability of quantitative data of such covariation, especially of the fetal skull and maternal pelvis, however, is still scarce. Here, we present direct evidence of morphological covariations between the skull and pelvis using actual mother-fetus dyads during the perinatal period of Macaca mulatta, a species that exhibits cephalopelvic proportions comparable to modern humans. We analyzed the covariation of the three-dimensional morphology of the fetal skull and maternal pelvis using computed tomography-based models. The covariation was mostly observed at the pelvic locations related to the birth canal, and the forms of the birth canal and fetal skull covary in such a way that reduces obstetric difficulties. Therefore, cephalopelvic covariation could have evolved not only in humans, but also in other primate taxa in parallel, or it could have evolved already in the early catarrhines.

Evolution of the human pelvis and obstructed labor: new explanations of an old obstetrical dilemma.

Without cesarean delivery, obstructed labor can result in maternal and fetal injuries or even death given a disproportion in size between the fetus and the maternal birth canal. The precise frequency of obstructed labor is difficult to estimate because of the widespread use of cesarean delivery for indications other than proven cephalopelvic disproportion, but it has been estimated that at least 1 million mothers per year are affected by this disorder worldwide. Why is the fit between the fetus and the maternal pelvis so tight? Why did evolution not lead to a greater safety margin, as in other primates? Here we review current research and suggest new hypotheses on the evolution of human childbirth and pelvic morphology. In 1960, Washburn suggested that this obstetrical dilemma arose because the human pelvis is an evolutionary compromise between two functions, bipedal gait and childbirth. However, recent biomechanical and kinematic studies indicate that pelvic width does not considerably affect the efficiency of bipedal gait and thus is unlikely to have constrained the evolution of a wider birth canal. Instead, bipedalism may have primarily constrained the flexibility of the pubic symphysis during pregnancy, which opens much wider in most mammals with large fetuses than in humans. We argue that the birth canal is mainly constrained by the trade-off between 2 pregnancy-related functions: while a narrow pelvis is disadvantageous for childbirth, it offers better support for the weight exerted by the viscera and the large human fetus during the long gestation period. We discuss the implications of this hypothesis for understanding pelvic floor dysfunction. Furthermore, we propose that selection for a narrow pelvis has also acted in males because of the role of pelvic floor musculature in erectile function. Finally, we review the cliff-edge model of obstetric selection to explain why evolution cannot completely eliminate cephalopelvic disproportion. This model also predicts that the regular application of life-saving cesarean delivery has evolutionarily increased rates of cephalopelvic disproportion already. We address how evolutionary models contribute to understanding and decision making in obstetrics and gynecology as well as in devising health care policies.

Cephalopelvic disproportion is associated with an altered uterine contraction shape in the active phase of labor.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if intrapartum contractions of a particular shape (rapid rise with slower return to baseline) are predictive of cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD). STUDY DESIGN: In an institutional review board (IRB)-approved study, cohorts of 100 women who underwent spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) and 100 who underwent cesarean section (C/S) for CPD or arrest of labor were consecutively identified between January 2004 and March 2005. Inclusion criteria included term, singleton pregnancies, nulliparity, and absence of fetal anomalies. One hour of interpretable electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) was obtained in active labor. Fall to rise (F:R) ratio was calculated by measuring the time for a contraction to return to its baseline from its peak ("fall") and the time for a contraction to rise to its peak ("rise"). The F:Rs were then averaged over the number of contractions. Data were analyzed using Student t test, Chi-square, and Fisher exact tests where appropriate. RESULTS: Maternal demographics are listed in Table I. The average F:R ratio was 1.55 for SVD versus 1.77 for C/S, a statistically significant difference (P = .00003). Analysis of variance revealed this difference persists when controlled for the potentially confounding factors shown. At F:R >1.76, moreover, there was a trend towards larger birth weight (P = .06). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates there is a difference in uterine contraction configuration that is more common in those labors destined for C/S due to CPD. This may indicate the presence of a heretofore unknown feedback mechanism as the uterus adapts to the dysfunctional labor.