Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 367
Filtrar
1.
Value Health Reg Issues ; 41: 114-122, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38325244

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the hospital service utilization patterns and direct healthcare hospital costs before and during peritoneal dialysis (PD) at home. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients with kidney failure (KF) was conducted at a Mexican Social Security Institute hospital for the year 2014. Cost categories included inpatient emergency room stays, inpatient services at internal medicine or surgery, and hospital PD. The study groups were (1) patients with KF before initiating home PD, (2) patients with less than 1 year of home PD (incident), and (3) patients with more than 1 year of home PD (prevalent). Costs were actualized to international dollars (Int$) 2023. RESULTS: We found that 53% of patients with KF used home PD services, 42% had not received any type of PD, and 5% had hospital dialysis while waiting for home PD. The estimated costs adjusting for age and sex were Int$5339 (95% CI 4680-9746) for patients without home PD, Int$17 556 (95% CI 15 314-19 789) for incident patients, and Int$7872 (95% CI 5994-9749) for prevalent patients; with significantly different averages for the 3 groups (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of services and cost is highest at the time of initiating PD, over time, using home PD leads to a significant reduction in use of hospital services, which translates into institutional cost savings. Our findings, especially considering the high rates of KF in Mexico, suggest a pressing need for interventions that can reduce healthcare costs at the beginning of renal replacement therapy.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Diálisis Peritoneal , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , México , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Renal/terapia , Insuficiencia Renal/economía , Insuficiencia Renal/epidemiología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemodiálisis en el Domicilio/economía , Hemodiálisis en el Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía
2.
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl ; 34(6): 642-654, 2023 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38725213

RESUMEN

Hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) treatments impact the economic burden and psychological distress faced by end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients and their caregivers. This review aimed to discuss the concept of an economic burden and the economic burden of different treatment options, and to highlight research gaps regarding the scarcity of previous studies relating economic burden to psychological well-being. We searched five electronic databases for papers published in 2010-2020. Papers focusing on measures of the economic burden from the government's perspective and diseases other than ESKD were excluded. Out of the 6635 publications identified, 10 publications were included. Three categories of economic burden were identified, namely, direct medical costs, direct non-medical costs, and indirect costs. Direct medical costs required the highest expenditure, whereas the lowest economic burden was for indirect costs. HD patients incurred a higher economic burden than PD patients. Most of the studies were carried out in Asia. The results of the research suggest that the economic burden may affect patients and caregivers, but it is unclear whether the economic burden affects the psychological well-being of the patients and caregivers. Very few studies have assessed the relationship between economic burden and psychological well-being, and further research is needed to gain further insight into the relationship between these two variables.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Costo de Enfermedad , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Fallo Renal Crónico , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/psicología , Cuidadores/psicología , Cuidadores/economía , Diálisis Renal/economía , Diálisis Renal/psicología , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Diálisis Peritoneal/psicología , Carga del Cuidador/economía , Carga del Cuidador/psicología
3.
Kidney360 ; 3(5): 883-890, 2022 05 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36128476

RESUMEN

Background: Increasing use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) will likely lead to increasing numbers of patients transitioning from PD to hemodialysis (HD). We describe the characteristics of patients who discontinued PD and converted to HD, trajectories of acute-care encounter rates and the total cost of care both before and after PD discontinuation, and the incidence of modality-related outcomes after PD discontinuation. Methods: We analyzed data in the United States Renal Data System to identify patients aged ≥12 years who were newly diagnosed with ESKD in 2001-2017, initiated PD during the first year of ESKD, and discontinued PD in 2009-2018. We estimated monthly rates of hospital admissions, observation stays, emergency department encounters, and Medicare Parts A and B costs during the 12 months before and after conversion from PD to HD, and the incidence of home HD initiation, death, and kidney transplantation after conversion to in-facility HD. Results: Among 232,699 patients who initiated PD, there were 124,213 patients who discontinued PD. Among them, 68,743 (55%) converted to HD. In this subgroup, monthly rates of acute-care encounters and total costs of care to Medicare sharply increased during the 6 months preceding PD discontinuation, peaking at 96.2 acute-care encounters per 100 patient-months and $20,701 per patient in the last month of PD. After conversion, rates decreased, but remained higher than before conversion. Among patients who converted to in-facility HD, the cumulative incidence of home HD initiation, death, and kidney transplantation at 24 months was 3%, 25%, and 7%, respectively. Conclusions: The transition from PD to HD is characterized by high rates of acute-care encounters and health-care expenditures. Quality improvement efforts should be aimed at improving transitions and encouraging both home HD and kidney transplantation after PD discontinuation.


Asunto(s)
Hemodiálisis en el Domicilio , Fallo Renal Crónico , Diálisis Peritoneal , Anciano , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Hemodiálisis en el Domicilio/economía , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Medicare , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Diálisis Renal , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
4.
Value Health ; 24(11): 1592-1602, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34711359

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Policy makers have suggested increasing peritoneal dialysis (PD) would improve end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) outcomes and reduce Medicare spending compared with hemodialysis (HD). We compared mortality, hospitalizations, and Medicare spending between PD and HD among uninsured adults with incident ESKD. METHODS: Using an instrumental variable design, we exploited a natural experiment encouraging PD among the uninsured. Uninsured patients usually receive Medicare at dialysis month 4. For those initiating PD, Medicare covers the first 3 dialysis months, including predialysis services in the calendar month when dialysis started. Starting dialysis later in a calendar month increases predialysis coverage that is essential for PD catheter placements. The policy encourages PD incrementally when ESKD develops later in the month. Dialysis start day appears to be unrelated to patient characteristics and effectively "randomizes patients" to dialysis modality, mitigating selection bias. RESULTS: Starting dialysis later in the month was associated with an increased PD uptake: every week later in the month was associated with an absolute increase of 0.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6%-0.9%) at dialysis day 1 and 0.5% (95% CI 0.3%-0.7%) at dialysis month 12. We observed no significant absolute difference between PD and HD for 12-month mortality (-0.9%, 95% CI -3.3% to 0.8%), hospitalizations during months 7 to 12 (-0.05, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.07), and Medicare spending during months 7 to 12 (-$702, 95% CI -$4004 to $2909). CONCLUSIONS: In an instrumental variable analysis, PD did not result in improved outcomes or lower costs than HD.


Asunto(s)
Costos y Análisis de Costo , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Diálisis Renal/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Formulación de Políticas , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
5.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 26(11): 898-906, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34313370

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) as a modality of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is largely underutilized globally. We analyzed PD utilization, impact of economic status, projected growth and impact of state policy(s) on PD growth in South Asia and Southeast Asia (SA&SEA) region. METHODS: The National Nephrology Societies of the region responded to a questionnaire on KRT practices. The responses were based on the latest registry data, acceptable community-based studies and societal perceptions. The representative countries were divided into high income and higher-middle income (HI & HMI) and low income and lower-middle income (LI & LMI) groups. RESULTS: Data provided by 15 countries showed almost similar percentage of GDP as health expenditure (4%-7%). But there was a significant difference in per capita income (HI & HMI -US$ 28 129 vs. LI & LMI - US$ 1710.2) between the groups. Even after having no significant difference in monthly cost of haemodialysis (HD) and PD in LI & LMI countries, they have poorer PD utilization as compared to HI & HMI countries (3.4% vs. 10.1%); the reason being lack of formal training/incentives and time constraints for the nephrologist while lack of reimbursement and poor general awareness of modalities has been a snag for the patients. The region expects ≥10% PD growth in the near future. Hong Kong and Thailand with 'PD first' policy have the highest PD utilization. CONCLUSION: Important deterrents to PD underutilization were lack of PD centric policies, lackadaisical patient/physician's attitude, lack of structured patient awareness programs, formal training programs and affordability.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Política de Salud/tendencias , Enfermedades Renales/terapia , Nefrólogos/tendencias , Nefrología/tendencias , Diálisis Peritoneal/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Asia/epidemiología , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Países en Desarrollo/economía , Predicción , Producto Interno Bruto , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Gastos en Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Política de Salud/economía , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Renta , Enfermedades Renales/economía , Enfermedades Renales/epidemiología , Nefrólogos/economía , Nefrólogos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Nefrología/economía , Nefrología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Formulación de Políticas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/legislación & jurisprudencia
6.
Ren Fail ; 43(1): 754-765, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33913395

RESUMEN

Background: The new Family-Community-Hospital (FCH) three-level comprehensive management aimed to improve the efficiency and scale of peritoneal dialysis (PD) to meet the increased population of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Our study focused on the clinical outcomes, quality of life, and costs evaluation of this model in a multi-center and prospective cohort study.Methods: A total of 190 ESRD patients who commenced PD at Shanghai Songjiang District were enrolled. According to different PD management models, patients were divided into the Family-Community-Hospital three-level management model (n = 90) and the conventional all-course central hospital management model (n = 100). The primary outcome was clinical outcomes of PD. The secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and medical costs evaluation.Results: Compared to conventional management, community-based FCH management achieved a similar dialysis therapeutic effect, including dropout rate (p = 0.366), peritonitis rate (p = 0.965), patient survival (p = 0.441), and technique survival (p = 0.589). Follow-up data showed that similar levels of the renal and peritoneal functions, serum albumin, cholesterol and triglyceride, PTH, serum calcium, and phosphorus between the two groups (all p > 0.05). HRQOL survey showed that the FCH management model helped to improve the psychological status of PD patients, including social functioning (p = 0.006), role-emotional (p = 0.032), and mental health (p = 0.036). FCH management also reduced the hospitalization (p = 0.009) and outpatient visits (p = 0.001) and saved annual hospitalization costs (p = 0.005), outpatient costs (p = 0.026), and transport costs (p = 0.006).Conclusions: Compared with conventional management, community-based FCH management achieved similar outcomes, improved psychological health, reduced medical budgets, and thus had a good social prospect.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Peritonitis/etiología , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , China , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía , Fallo Renal Crónico/psicología , Masculino , Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Peritonitis/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos
7.
Blood Purif ; 50(4-5): 662-666, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33626546

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is underutilized in many parts of the world despite pro-PD health policies. The physical and cognitive demands of PD means that over half of eligible patients require some form of assistance. As such, many countries now offer assisted PD (aPD) programs to help patients start or stay on PD as opposed to in-center hemodialysis (HD). In order to evaluate the potential scope of aPD, it is important to review the outcomes and cost considerations of aPD. SUMMARY: We reviewed available data from different countries and regions for health outcomes between aPD and in-center HD, with a focus on quality of life (QoL), mortality, hospitalization, and technique survival. We also evaluated studies discussing the overall costs of delivering aPD, including training, operating costs, and indirect costs and compared these to in-center HD costs for the same regions. Key Messages: aPD patients are older and more frail than either self-care PD patients and many in-center HD patients. We found no evidence for any difference in QoL, mortality, or hospitalization between aPD and in-center HD after adjustment for these differences. There is some evidence for an association between nurse assistance and improved technique survival as compared to family assistance or self-care PD. Despite increased cost of providing assistance in PD, it is still significantly less expensive than in-center HD in Western Europe and Canada.


Asunto(s)
Diálisis Peritoneal , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Diálisis Peritoneal/métodos , Diálisis Peritoneal/mortalidad , Calidad de Vida
9.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 26(2): 170-177, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33207027

RESUMEN

AIM: Kidney failure patients in the Philippines have free choice on their kidney replacement therapy (KRT), with a majority choosing haemodialysis (HD) over peritoneal dialysis (PD) and transplantation despite the inadequate coverage of HD. Although national health insurance coverage is limited, KRT remains to be one of the top benefits pay-outs in the country. The study aims to identify the most cost-effective policy strategy for financing KRT in the Philippines, in the context of a universal healthcare policy. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to estimate and compare the costs and benefits of different policy options with the comparator being partial HD coverage. Direct medical, non-medical and indirect costs were measured, while outcomes were reported through quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Parameters were derived from the kidney disease registry, hospital statistics from a tertiary hospital and a patient survey. RESULTS: The results of the cost-effectiveness analysis showed that shifting to a PD-First policy provides better value-for-money with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 570 029 Philippine Pesos (PHP) per QALY gained, compared with the ICER of the PD-First combined with pre-emptive transplant option of 577 989 PHP per QALY gained. Expanding existing HD coverage to 156 sessions was the least cost-effective policy (1 522 437 PHP per QALY gained). CONCLUSION: Government should consider shifting to a PD-First strategy and support policies that promote kidney transplants among existing PD and HD patients. This study also highlights the need for proper evaluation of partial coverage policies to ensure that government investments represent good value-for-money and patients receive optimal care.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/economía , Atención de Salud Universal , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/economía , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Trasplante de Riñón/economía , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Filipinas , Calidad de Vida , Diálisis Renal/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Nat Rev Nephrol ; 17(1): 33-45, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33005036

RESUMEN

Kidney disease is a global public health concern across the age spectrum, including in children. However, our understanding of the true burden of kidney disease in low-resource areas is often hampered by a lack of disease awareness and access to diagnosis. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in low-resource settings poses multiple challenges, including late diagnosis, the need for ongoing access to care and the frequent unavailability of costly therapies such as dialysis and transplantation. Moreover, children in such settings are at particular risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) owing to preventable and/or reversible causes - many children likely die from potentially reversible kidney disease because they lack access to appropriate care. Acute peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an important low-cost treatment option. Initiatives, such as the Saving Young Lives programme, to train local medical staff from low-resource areas to provide care for AKI, including acute PD, have already saved hundreds of children. Future priorities include capacity building for both educational purposes and to provide further resources for AKI management. As local knowledge and confidence increase, CKD management strategies should also develop. Increased awareness and advocacy at both the local government and international levels will be required to continue to improve the diagnosis and treatment of AKI and CKD in children worldwide.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Diálisis Peritoneal/métodos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Países en Desarrollo , Diagnóstico Precoz , Intervención Médica Temprana , Glomerulonefritis/diagnóstico , Glomerulonefritis/terapia , Recursos en Salud , Fuerza Laboral en Salud , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/provisión & distribución , Trasplante de Riñón , Nefrología , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Diálisis Peritoneal/instrumentación , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal , Anomalías Urogenitales/diagnóstico , Anomalías Urogenitales/terapia , Reflujo Vesicoureteral/diagnóstico , Reflujo Vesicoureteral/terapia
11.
Nephrol Nurs J ; 47(4): 343-346, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32830940

RESUMEN

Peritoneal dialysis transfer sets (extension lines) are replaced every six to nine months to minimize peritoneal dialysis catheter complications. The aim of this study was to compare a revised non-bag transfer set exchange procedure with the standard bag exchange procedure on nursing time, costs, and safety. Thirty-three people were randomized to two groups - a standard bag exchange procedure group (n = 16) and a non-bag transfer set exchange procedure group (n = 17). The standard bag exchange procedure took a median of 32 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 25 to 38 minutes) compared to the non-bag transfer set exchange procedure of 6 minutes (IQR 4 to 8 minutes) (p Ò 0.0001). There was one episode of peritonitis in each group within the 72-hour follow-up period. The average cost of the non-bag transfer set exchange procedure was $24.54 lower, a 37% cost reduction. This study has shown the revised non-bag transfer set replacement procedure appears to be safe, consume less participant and staff time, and decreases costs.


Asunto(s)
Diálisis Peritoneal/métodos , Diálisis Peritoneal/enfermería , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Humanos , Investigación en Evaluación de Enfermería , Diálisis Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Peritonitis/etiología , Peritonitis/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos
12.
Clin Nephrol ; 93(1): 17-20, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32145758

RESUMEN

The percentage of the population in low-middle-income countries (LMIC) with hemodialysis availability has gradually increased over the last 8 years. Note that only 3% of the treatments of these countries are done as peritoneal dialysis, which is the more cost-effective modality. The best current estimate of hemodialysis access for Africa is 25%, Southeast Asia 35%, and South America 65% [1]. The main issues that impede hemodialysis access remain poverty, the unaffordability of treatment, the substantial cost of setting up a dialysis unit as well as the lack of options to purchase dialyzers, tubing, and unit supplies at reasonable costs. This article presents cost-saving approaches for providing hemodialysis in LMIC along with words of caution on how to determine the sustainability of the project in areas with high levels of need and limited resources.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diálisis Renal/economía , Países en Desarrollo , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Pobreza
13.
Rev Med Suisse ; 16(683): 390-394, 2020 Feb 26.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32129014

RESUMEN

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has often been considered as a renal replacement method that is not feasible for the elderly population. Numerous recent studies have shown that this method is in fact very well, if not better tolerated by elderly patients. In Switzerland and abroad, its economic advantages have also been underlined during the past ten years. As a consequence, the use of PD is increasing, and primary care physicians are more often confronted to PD patients. Therefore, they have to be aware of some basic treatment principles, which are reviewed in this article.


La dialyse péritonéale (DP) a souvent été considérée à tort comme inadaptée à la population âgée, qui représente la majorité des patients en insuffisance rénale terminale. De nombreuses études ont montré que cette méthode est très bien, voire mieux tolérée que l'hémodialyse par les personnes âgées. Son aspect économique est de plus en plus mis en avant en Suisse et à l'étranger. Alors que la DP représentait longtemps < 10 % de la population dialysée, nous observons ces dernières années une hausse de patients traités par cette méthode. Par conséquent, le médecin traitant et l'interniste hospitalier seront plus fréquemment confrontés à ces patients. Ceci nécessite des bonnes notions de base de cette modalité comme discuté dans cet article.


Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales/educación , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Peritoneal , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Suiza
14.
Perit Dial Int ; 40(4): 377-383, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32063181

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The benefits of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) have been established, but patient adherence to treatment remains a concern. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) programs are a potential solution; however, the cost implications are not well established. This study modeled, from the payer perspective, expected net costs and clinical consequences of a novel RPM program in Colombia. METHODS: Amarkov model was used to project costs and clinical outcomes for APD patients with and without RPM. Clinical inputs were directly estimated from Renal Care Services data or taken from the literature. Dialysis costs were estimated from national fees. Inpatient costs were obtained from a recent Colombian study. The model projected overall direct costs and several clinical outcomes. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (DSA and PSA) were also conducted to characterize uncertainty in the results. RESULTS: The model projected that the implementation of an RPM program costing US$35 per month in a cohort of 100 APD patients over 1 year would save US$121,233. The model also projected 31 additional months free of complications, 27 fewer hospitalizations, 518 fewer hospitalization days, and 6 fewer peritonitis episodes. In the DSA, results were most sensitive to hospitalization rates and days of hospitalization, but cost savings were robust. The PSA found there was a 91% chance for the RPM program to be cost saving. CONCLUSION: The results of the model suggest that RPM is cost-effective in APD patients which should be verified by a rigorous prospective cost analysis.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Monitoreo Fisiológico/economía , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Consulta Remota/economía , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Colombia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos
15.
CMAJ Open ; 8(1): E96-E104, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32071144

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health care payers are interested in policy-level interventions to increase peritoneal dialysis use in end-stage renal disease. We examined whether increases in physician remuneration for peritoneal dialysis were associated with greater peritoneal dialysis use. METHODS: We studied a cohort of patients in Alberta who started long-term dialysis with at least 90 days of preceding nephrologist care between Jan. 1, 2001, and Dec. 31, 2014. We compared peritoneal dialysis use 90 days after dialysis initiation in patients cared for by fee-for-service nephrologists and those cared for by salaried nephrologists before and after weekly peritoneal dialysis remuneration increased from $0 to $32 (fee change 1, Apr. 1, 2002), $49 to $71 (fee change 2, Apr. 1, 2007), and $71 to $135 (fee change 3, Apr. 1, 2009). Remuneration for peritoneal dialysis remained less than hemodialysis until fee change 3. We performed a patient-level differences-in-differences logistic regression, adjusted for demographic characteristics and comorbidities, as well as an unadjusted interrupted time-series analysis of monthly outcome data. RESULTS: Our cohort included 4262 patients. There was no statistical evidence of a difference in the adjusted differences-indifferences estimator following fee change 1 (0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-1.81), 2 (1.15, 95% CI 0.73-1.83), or 3 (1.52, 95% CI 0.96-2.40). There was no significant difference in the immediate change or the trend over time in peritoneal dialysis use between fee-for-service and salaried groups following any of the fee changes in the interrupted time-series analysis. INTERPRETATION: We identified no statistical evidence of an increase in peritoneal dialysis use following increased fee-for-service remuneration for peritoneal dialysis. It remains unclear what role, if any, physician payment plays in selection of dialysis modality.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Remuneración , Adulto , Anciano , Alberta/epidemiología , Duración de la Terapia , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos , Vigilancia de la Población
16.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 52(3): 573-579, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32009220

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare the economic burden and cost-utility analysis of the renal replacement therapies, including hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and allograft kidney transplantation (KT) among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients from Yunnan Province, China. METHODS: Multistage stratified random sampling method was used to select presentative sample of 298 patients from four hospitals in Yunnan Province. The two-step model was applied to calculate a direct economic burden; the human capital approach was used to analyze the indirect economic burden. SF-36 scale was applied to assess the quality of life, while the improving score of quality of life was used to evaluate the cost-utility score. RESULTS: A total of 298 patients were analyzed, including 108 HD patients, 91 PD patients and 99 KT patients. The mean unit economic expenses of HD, PD, and KT were $11,783.6 ± 402.63, $11,059.8 ± 709.51, and $21,151.1 ± 11,419.57, respectively. Based on the cost-utility analysis, the cost of improving one unit of quality of life in KT, PD, and HD was $599.86, $1373.89 and $2021.20, respectively; a significant difference was observed between the KT group and the HD or PD group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden of ESRD in Yunnan was substantial. The cost-utility was the best in the renal transplantation group. Kidney transplantation is still recommended as the first approach for patients with ESRD, followed by PD.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Fallo Renal Crónico , Trasplante de Riñón/economía , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Calidad de Vida , Diálisis Renal/economía , China/epidemiología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/psicología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Peritoneal/métodos , Diálisis Renal/métodos
17.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 122, 2020 Feb 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32059726

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Renal replacement therapy was a lifesaving yet high-cost treatment for people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). This study aimed to estimate the direct medical costs per capita of ESKD by different treatment strategies: haemodialysis (HD); peritoneal dialysis (PD); kidney transplantation (KT) (in the first year); KT (in the second year), and by two urban health insurance schemes. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational cohort study. Data were obtained from outpatient and inpatient claims database of two urban health insurance from Guangzhou City, Southern China. Adult patients with HD (n = 3765; mean age 58 years), PD (n = 1237; 51 years), KT (first year) (n = 117; 37 years) and KT (second year) (n = 41; 39 years) were identified between 2010 and 2012. The primary outcome was the annual per patient medical costs in 2013 Chinese Yuan (CNY) incurred in the outpatient and inpatient sectors. Secondary outcomes were annual outpatient visits and inpatient admissions, length of stay per admission. Generalized linear regression and bootstrapping statistical methods were used for analysis. RESULTS: The estimated average annual medical costs for patients on HD were CNY 94,760.5 (US$15,066.0), 95% Confidence Interval (CI): CNY85,166.6-106,972.2, which was higher than those for patients on PD [CNY80,762.9 (US$12,840.5), 95% CI: CNY 76,249.8-85,498.9]. The estimated annual cost ratio of HD versus PD was 1.17 (95% CI: 1.12-1.25). Among the transplanted patients, the estimated average annual medical costs in the first year were CNY132,253.0 (US$21,026.9), 95%CI: CNY114,009.9-153,858.6, and in the second year were CNY93,155.3 (US$14,810.8), 95%CI: CNY61,120.6-101,989.1. The mean annual medical costs for dialysis patients under Urban Employee-based Basic Medical Insurance scheme were significantly higher than those for patients under Urban Resident-based Basic Medical Insurance scheme (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The direct medical costs of ESKD patients were high and different by types of renal replacement therapy and insurance. The findings can be used to conduct cost-effectiveness research on different types of RRT for ESKD patients that provides economic evidence for health policy design in China.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , China , Ciudades , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Trasplante de Riñón/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Diálisis Renal/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Salud Urbana , Adulto Joven
18.
BMC Nephrol ; 21(1): 42, 2020 02 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32019528

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the lifetime cost-effectiveness of first-line dialysis modalities for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients under the "Peritoneal Dialysis First" policy. METHODS: Lifetime cost-effectiveness analyses from both healthcare provider and societal perspectives were performed using Markov modelling by simulating at age 60. Empirical data on costs and health utility scores collected from our studies were combined with published data on health state transitions and survival data to estimate the lifetime cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost-effectiveness of three competing dialysis modalities: peritoneal dialysis (PD), hospital-based haemodialysis (HD) and nocturnal home HD. RESULTS: For cost-effectiveness analysis over a lifetime horizon from the perspective of healthcare provider, hospital-based HD group (lifetime cost USD$142,389; 6.58 QALYs) was dominated by the PD group (USD$76,915; 7.13 QALYs). Home-based HD had the highest effectiveness (8.37 QALYs) but with higher cost (USD$97,917) than the PD group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was USD$16,934 per QALY gained for home-based HD over PD. From the societal perspective, the results were similar and the ICER was USD$1195 per QALY gained for home-based HD over PD. Both ICERs fell within the acceptable thresholds. Changes in model parameters via sensitivity analyses had a minimal impact on ICER values. CONCLUSIONS: This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of dialysis modalities and service delivery models for ESRD patients under "Peritoneal Dialysis First" policy. For both healthcare provider and societal perspectives, PD as first-line dialysis modality was cost-saving relative to hospital-based HD, supporting the existing PD First or favoured policy. When compared with PD, Nocturnal home Home-based HD was considered a cost-effective first-line dialysis modality for ESRD patients.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemodiálisis en el Domicilio/economía , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Cadenas de Markov , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/economía , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida
19.
Clin Nephrol ; 93(1): 72-75, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31426908

RESUMEN

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is currently an important public health problem with high morbidity and mortality especially in low- and middle-income countries. In these low-resource settings, prevention of death from severe AKI involves well-coordinated intensive care services, which are often absent or expensive. Provision of cost-effective interventions that are widely available and accessible to everyone is important. Acute peritoneal dialysis (PD), which is technically more economical than hemodialysis, could potentially become a cost-effective solution in the management of severe AKI. An acute PD project in Moshi, Tanzania, was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of PD using a comparison between subsidized and privately procured resources. The average cost per AKI course of treatment with PD when subsidized was USD 420, while if the same treatment was privately procured it was USD 788. Using a WHO guideline that categorizes interventions costing less than once the national annual GDP per capital as highly cost-effective, the Moshi PD project was found to be an appropriate example because the intervention cost (USD 788) was lower than the GDP per capita of Tanzania (USD 879 in 2012). If more countries develop similar programs in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly for children, this would allow for increased opportunity for economies of scale in the supply of consumables and could lower costs over the long term. Ministries of health in low-resource settings should consider developing programs for provision of acute PD to achieve equitable, cost-effective, and sustainable programs for treatment of AKI and subsidies to increase access to lower-income patients.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , África del Sur del Sahara , Recursos en Salud , Humanos , Desarrollo de Programa , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud
20.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 14(12): 1763-1772, 2019 12 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31753816

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) for ESKD is associated with similar mortality, higher quality of life, and lower costs compared with hemodialysis (HD), but has historically been underused. We assessed the effect of the 2011 Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for dialysis on PD initiation, modality switches, and stable PD use. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Using US Renal Data System and Medicare data, we identified all United States patients with ESKD initiating dialysis before (2006-2010) and after (2011-2013) PPS implementation, and observed their modality for up to 2 years after dialysis initiation. Using logistic regression models, we examined the associations between PPS and early PD experience (any PD 1-90 days after initiation), late PD use (any PD 91-730 days after initiation), and modality switches (PD-to-HD or HD-to-PD 91-730 days after initiation). We adjusted for patient, dialysis facility, and regional characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 619,126 patients with incident ESKD received dialysis at Medicare-certified facilities, 2006-2013. Observed early PD experience increased from 9.4% before PPS to 12.6% after PPS. Observed late PD use increased from 12.1% to 16.1%. In adjusted analyses, PPS was associated with increased early PD experience (odds ratio [OR], 1.51; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.47 to 1.55; P<0.001) and late PD use (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.45 to 1.50; P<0.001). In subgroup analyses, late PD use increased in part due to an increase in HD-to-PD switches among those without early PD experience (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.52 to 1.66; P<0.001) and a decrease in PD-to-HD switches among those with early PD experience (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.98; P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: More patients started, stayed on, and switched to PD after dialysis payment reform. This occurred without a substantial increase in transfers to HD.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Medicare , Diálisis Peritoneal/tendencias , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...