Sir Frederick Grant Banting - the discoverer of insulin. On the 100th anniversary on the Nobel Prize.

Over the past thousands of years, diabetes has deprived people all over the world of their lives. Until 1922, mankind remained powerless. However, change came, with Frederick Banting (1891-1941), the discoverer of insulin. This breakthrough discovery was made not by a great scientist, but by a hard-working and persistent doctor. Perhaps Banting's conscientiousness and integrity stemmed from where he grew up? A small farm in the provinces certainly influenced his further development. A development that was not obvious, because as a child little Freddie had learning difficulties. Determination led him to medicine. It must not have been without surprise to Professor MacLeod (1876-1935) when, in his office at the University of Ontario, he heard from the 30-year-old doctor that he had an idea on how to save lives from an incurable disease. The opportunity Banting was given, he used effectively. Together with the help of his student Charles Best (1899-1978), he isolated insulin. The dissemination of insulin in Poland was very quickly taken up by Kazimierz Funk (1884-1967), the discoverer of thiamine and creator of the term 'vitamin'. As head of the Department of Biochemistry at the National Institute of Hygiene (PZH), he began producing insulin from bovine pancreases in 1924. He carried out this initiative using his private funds, equipping the laboratory with the appropriate equipment. Banting's remarkable feat was rewarded in 1923. Nobel Prize, which he shared with MacLeod. The fact that the actual co-discoverer of insulin, Charles Best, was not included in the award outraged Banting to such an extent that he decided not to accept the prize. After much persuasion, he changed his mind, but shared the financial reward with his faithful assistant. The discoverer's determination and behaviour in the face of success provides an invaluable lesson for today's doctors and scientists. By following the principles Banting espoused, we can honour his memory.

The Nobel Prize of Physiology or Medicine, 1923: controversies on the discovery of the antidiabetic hormone.

AIMS: To analyze the main contributions to the discovery of the antidiabetic hormone in the period between 1889, the year in which Oskar Minkowski demonstrated that complete pancreatectomy in dogs caused diabetes, and the year 1923, the date in which the clinical use of insulin was consolidated. A main objective has been to review the controversies that followed the Nobel Prize and to outline the role of the priority rule in Science. METHODS: We have considered the priority rule defined by Robert Merton in 1957, which takes into account the date of acceptance of the report of a discovery in an accredited scientific journal and/or the granting of a patent, complemented by the criteria set out by Ronald Vale and Anthony Hyman (2016) regarding the transfer of information to the scientific community and its validation by it. The awarding of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in October 1923 has represented a frame of reference. The claims and disputes regarding the prioritization of the contributions of the main researchers in the organotherapy of diabetes have been analyzed through the study of their scientific production and the debate generated in academic institutions. MAIN RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: (1) According to the criteria of Merton, Vale and Hyman, the priority of the discovery of the antidiabetic hormone corresponds to the investigations developed in Europe by E. Gley (1900), GL Zülzer (1908) and NC Paulescu (1920). (2) The active principle of the pancreatic extracts developed by Zülzer (acomatol), Paulescu (pancreina) and Banting and Best (insulin) was the same. (3) JB Collip succeeded in isolating the active ingredient from the pancreatic extract in January 1922, eliminating impurities to the point of enabling its use in the clinic. (4) In 1972, the Nobel Foundation modified the purpose of the 1923 Physiology or Medicine award to Banting and Macleod by introducing a new wording: "the credit for having produced the pancreatic hormone in a practical available form" (instead of "for the discovery of insulin").

On the occasion of the centennial of insulin therapy (1922-2022), II-Organotherapy of diabetes mellitus (1906-1923): Acomatol. Pancreina. Insulin.

AIMS: The general objective has been the historiographical investigation of the organotherapy of diabetes mellitus between 1906 and 1923 in its scientific, social and political dimensions, with special emphasis on the most relevant contributions of researchers and institutions and on the controversies generated on the priority of the "discovery" of antidiabetic hormone. METHODS: We have analyzed the experimental procedures and determination of biological parameters used by researchers during the investigated period (1906-1923): pancreatic ablation techniques, induction of acinar atrophy with preservation of pancreatic islets, preparation of pancreatic extracts (PE) with antidiabetic activity, clinical chemistry procedures (glycemia, glycosuria, ketonemia, ketonuria, etc.). The field investigation has included on-site and online visits to cities, towns, buildings, laboratories, universities, museums and research centers where the reported events took place, obtaining documents, photographic images, audiovisual recordings, as well as personal interviews complementary to the documentation consulted (primary sources, critical bibliography, reference works). The documentary archival sources have been classified according to theme, including those consulted in situ with those extracted online and digitized copies received mainly by email. Among the many archives contacted, those listed below have been most useful and have been consulted on site and on repeated visits: National Library of Medicine-Historical Archives (Bethesda, MD, USA); Archives, University of Toronto and Thomas Fisher Rare Books Library (Toronto, Ontario, Canada); Francis A. County Library of Medicine, Harvard University (Boston, Mass, USA); Zentralbibliothek der Humboldt-Universität (Berlin, DE), Geheimarchiv des Preußischen Staates (Berlin, DE); Landesamt für Bürger-und Ordnungsangelegenheiten (LABO) (Berlin, DE); Arhivele Academiei Române si Universitǎții Carol Davila (Bucharest, RO). MAIN RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: A) The European researchers Zülzer (Z Exp Path Ther 23:307-318, 1908) and Paulescu (CR Seances Soc Biol Fil 85:558, 1921) meet the requirements of the priority rule in the discovery of the antidiabetic hormone. B) Factors of socioeconomic and political nature related with the First World War and the inter-war period delayed the process of purification of the antidiabetic hormone in Europe. C) The Canadian scientist J. Collip, University of Alberta, temporarily assimilated to the University of Toronto, and the American chemist and researcher G. Walden, with the expert collaboration of Eli Lilly & Co., were the main authors of the purification process of the antidiabetic hormone. D) The scientific evidence, reflected in the heuristics of this research, allows to assert that the basic investigation carried out by the Department of Physiology of the University of Toronto, directed by the Scottish J. Macleod, in conjunction with the clinical research undertaken by the Department of Medicine of the University of Toronto (W. Campbell, A. Fletcher, D. Graham) made it possible in record time the successful treatment of patients with what was until then a deadly disease.

The continuum of insulin development viewed in the context of a collaborative process toward leveraging science to save lives: Following the trail of publications and patents one century after insulin's first use in humans.

Nearly 100 years ago, diabetes, a disease expected to reach global prevalence of at least 10% within the decade, was a fatal diagnosis. This year of 2022 marks a century since insulin, a lifesaving treatment for those living with diabetes, was purified, tested in humans, and brought to the bedside through widespread commercial production, thus saving countless lives. Insulin's arrival to the world stage was acknowledged with the 1923 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for "the discovery of insulin", the first among several Prizes awarded to honor scientific work on insulin. This initial awarding has been the subject of significant controversy since, as numerous other scientists paved the way towards the ultimate success, and priority for the true "discovery of insulin" has been argued for many other scientists. The intention and regulations around the Nobel Prize nomination and award process presented herein offer insight into the 1923 Nobel prize designation for the Toronto group, which distinguished itself in the accomplishment by their success in purifying insulin from pancreatic extract and in bringing insulin to worldwide production and the homes of those who needed it. However, a continuous, collaborative process involving contributors spanning centuries and continents was required for the development, rather than discovery, of insulin therapy and its benefits to humanity. This should be the story's enduring legacy. The prior 100 years have witnessed a series of significant innovations in insulin development and therapeutics, but both a cure for diabetes and equitable insulin access remain out of reach and require inspired attention and continuous diligent efforts.

La découverte de l'insuline 1921­1922 : un saut dans la recherche biomédicale.

Discovery of insulin. If the symptoms of diabetes have been known since Antiquity, it is at the end of the 19th century that several investigators searched for the active substance of the pancreas and endeavoured to produce extracts that lowered blood and urine glucose and decreased polyuria in pancreatectomized dogs. The breakthrough came 100 years ago when the team of Frederick Banting, Charles Best and James Collip, working in the Department of Physiology, headed by John MacLeod at the University of Toronto, managed to obtain pancreatic extracts that could be used to treat patients and rescue them from the edge of death by starvation, the only treatment then available. This achievement was quickly recognized by the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine to Banting and MacLeod in 1923. The discovery has had important scientific, industrial and clinical developments still efficient nowadays.

Title: La découverte de l'insuline 1921­1922 : un saut dans la recherche biomédicale. Abstract: Si les symptômes du diabète ont été décrits depuis l'Antiquité et caractérisés par la présence de sucre dans les urines et une soif intense, ce n'est qu'à la fin du xixe siècle que les travaux de plusieurs équipes aboutissent à rechercher la substance active de la sécrétion interne du pancréas dans des extraits susceptibles de diminuer le glucose dans le sang et les urines chez le chien diabétique. C'est à l'Université de Toronto, au Canada, il y a 100 ans, entre 1921 et 1922, que Frederick Banting, Charles Best et James Collip, travaillant dans le département de physiologie dirigé par John MacLeod, obtiennent des extraits pancréatiques suffisamment purifiés qui permettent de traiter de jeunes patients diabétiques. Cette découverte de l'insuline est très vite reconnue et saluée par l'attribution du Prix Nobel de Physiologie ou Médecine en 1923 à Frederick Banting et John MacLeod. Cette découverte a eu d'importantes retombées scientifiques, industrielles et cliniques, toujours d'actualité.

La découverte de l'insuline.

The first therapeutic benefits of insulin were recorded after the injection of pancreatic extract, given on January 23, 1922 in Toronto to a 14-year-old teenager. Until then, type I diabetes was always fatal, within weeks or months; the fatal outcome being delayed only at the cost of a drastic low-calorie diet. In previous decades, the importance of the pancreas in the development of diabetes had been pointed out, but all attempts to use a pancreatic extract had failed. It is with the objective of "neutralizing" the destructive effects of pancreatic juice (proteolytic) that the isolation of insulin was carried out by a research team which was totally improbable since it was headed by an orthopedic surgeon, Frederick Banting and a 22-year-old stagiaire, Charles Best. Their work was carried out in the university physiology laboratory of John Macleod and their outcome was made possible thanks to the skills of James Collip who purified the insulin preparation. Scientific reality invites us to emphasize that, Banting works, based on a wrong hypothesis, drew towards an historical discovery. Very quickly recognized as of major importance for medicine, the discovery was greeted by the attribution of the Nobel Prize in 1923. For a hundred years, insulin has not ceased to be an essential drug for tens of millions of patients in the world, but it has been a motor for scientific research: innovation in galenic pharmacy and biopharmacy, in fundamental chemistry as a subject for the study of the structure, analysis and synthesis of proteins, and finally, as a motor for the development of biotechnologies, since insulin was the first drug prepared by DNA-recombinant technology, and marketed in 1982.

A diabetologia social em Portugal. Génese, influências e concretizações (1926-1931) / Social diabetology in portugal. Genesis, influences and achievements (1926-1931)

A diabetes é uma epidemia silenciosa e debilitadora que tem recebido uma atenção redobrada nas últimas décadas por parte da Medicina. Este trabalho pretende realizar uma análise sobre o aparecimento da diabetologia social em Portugal, centrado no segundo quartel do século XX. Primeiramente pretende-se perceber a génese desta área médica, tendo por base o trabalho desenvolvido pelo médico Ernesto Roma em Lisboa. Segue-se uma análise focada no rastreamento das correntes de pensamento médico que influenciaram a diabetologia portuguesa e por último pretende-se perceber como foi organizado o modelo de assistência aos diabéticos nos primeiros tempos da sua existência. (AU)

Diabetes is a silent and debilitating epidemic that has received increased attention in recent decades by Medicine. This work intends to carry out an analysis of the emergence of social diabetology in Portugal, centered in the second quarter of the 20th century. Firstly, it is intended to understand the genesis of this medical area, based on the work developed by the physician Ernesto Roma in Lisbon. This is followed by an analysis focused on tracking the currents of medical thought that influenced Portuguese diabetology and, finally, it is intended to understand how the model of assistance to diabetics was organized in the early days of its existence.(AU)

Insulin therapy development beyond 100 years.

The first insulin preparation capable of consistently lowering blood glucose was developed in 1921. But 100 years later, blood glucose control with insulin in people with diabetes is nearly universally suboptimal, with essentially the same molecule still delivered by the same inappropriate subcutaneous injection route. Bypassing this route with oral administration appears to have become technologically feasible, accelerating over the past 50 years, either with packaged insulin peptides or by chemical insulin mimetics. Some of the problems of prospective unregulated absorption of insulin into the circulation from subcutaneous depots might be overcome with glucose-responsive insulins. Approaches to these problems could be modification of the peptide by adducts, or the use of nanoparticles or insulin patches, which deliver insulin according to glucose concentration. Some attention has been paid to targeting insulin preferentially to different organs, either by molecular engineering of insulin, or with adducts. But all these approaches still have problems in even beginning to match the responsiveness of physiological insulin delivery to metabolic requirements, both prandially and basally. As would be expected, for all these technically complex approaches, many examples of abandoned development can be found. Meanwhile, it is becoming possible to change the duration of action of subcutaneous injected insulin analogues to act even more rapidly for meals, and towards weekly insulin for basal administration. The state of the art of all these approaches, and the barriers to success, are reviewed here.

Structural principles of insulin formulation and analog design: A century of innovation.

BACKGROUND: The discovery of insulin in 1921 and its near-immediate clinical use initiated a century of innovation. Advances extended across a broad front, from the stabilization of animal insulin formulations to the frontiers of synthetic peptide chemistry, and in turn, from the advent of recombinant DNA manufacturing to structure-based protein analog design. In each case, a creative interplay was observed between pharmaceutical applications and then-emerging principles of protein science; indeed, translational objectives contributed to a growing molecular understanding of protein structure, aggregation and misfolding. SCOPE OF REVIEW: Pioneering crystallographic analyses-beginning with Hodgkin's solving of the 2-Zn insulin hexamer-elucidated general features of protein self-assembly, including zinc coordination and the allosteric transmission of conformational change. Crystallization of insulin was exploited both as a step in manufacturing and as a means of obtaining protracted action. Forty years ago, the confluence of recombinant human insulin with techniques for site-directed mutagenesis initiated the present era of insulin analogs. Variant or modified insulins were developed that exhibit improved prandial or basal pharmacokinetic (PK) properties. Encouraged by clinical trials demonstrating the long-term importance of glycemic control, regimens based on such analogs sought to resemble daily patterns of endogenous ß-cell secretion more closely, ideally with reduced risk of hypoglycemia. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS: Next-generation insulin analog design seeks to explore new frontiers, including glucose-responsive insulins, organ-selective analogs and biased agonists tailored to address yet-unmet clinical needs. In the coming decade, we envision ever more powerful scientific synergies at the interface of structural biology, molecular physiology and therapeutics.

Winner's curse: The sad aftermath of the discovery of insulin.

Every young researcher dreams of making a great discovery, but few achieve it. If they do, success does not guarantee happiness. There is little satisfaction in discovering something if others get the credit, and those who achieve fame must face the 'winner's curse' of living up to their reputation. Few discoveries have been more dramatic than the isolation of insulin which, as Michael Bliss said, resembled a secular miracle. And yet, as he also pointed out, this great discovery brought little happiness to those who made it. Some were sidelined, and Banting and Best were saddled with the winner's curse. Here, we look at the ways in which a great discovery can haunt its discoverers.

A comprehensive account of insulin and LDL receptor activity over the years: A highlight on their signaling and functional role.

Insulin receptor (IR) was discovered in 1970. Shortcomings in IR transcribed signals were found pro-diabetic, which could also inter-relate obesity and atherosclerosis in a time-dependent manner. Low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) was discovered in 1974. Later studies showed that insulin could modulate LDLR expression and activity. Repression of LDLR transcription in the absence or inactivity of insulin showed a direct cause of atherosclerosis. Leptin receptor (OB-R) was found in 1995 and its resistance became responsible for developing obesity. The three interlinked pathologies namely, diabetes, atherosclerosis, and obesity were later on marked as metabolic syndrome-X (MSX). In 2012, the IR-LDLR inter-association was identified. In 2019, the proficiency of signal transmission from this IR-LDLR receptor complex was reported. LDLR was found to mimic IR-generated signaling path when it remains bound to IR in IR-DLR interlocked state. This was the first time LDLR was found sending messages besides its LDL-clearing activity from blood vessels.

100 YEARS OF INSULIN: A brief history of diabetes genetics: insights for pancreatic beta-cell development and function.

Since the discovery of insulin 100 years ago, our knowledge and understanding of diabetes have grown exponentially. Specifically, with regards to the genetics underlying diabetes risk, our discoveries have paralleled developments in our understanding of the human genome and our ability to study genomics at scale; these advancements in genetics have both accompanied and led to those in diabetes treatment. This review will explore the timeline and history of gene discovery and how this has coincided with progress in the fields of genomics. Examples of genetic causes of monogenic diabetes are presented and the continuing expansion of allelic series in these genes and the challenges these now cause for diagnostic interpretation along with opportunities for patient stratification are discussed.

Realising the long-term promise of insulin therapy: the DCCT/EDIC study.

The introduction of insulin in the treatment of juvenile-onset, now type 1, diabetes mellitus transformed a rapidly fatal disease into a chronic degenerative one. During the insulin-treatment era, long-term microvascular and cardiovascular complications proved to be the bane of existence for people with type 1 diabetes, leading to blindness, kidney failure, amputations, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and premature mortality. The nascent understanding of the link between non-physiologically regulated glucose levels and these complications led to the development of new treatment tools in the 1970s and 1980s that facilitated the delivery of insulin to achieve glucose levels closer to non-diabetic levels. These therapeutic advances set the stage for definitive testing of the glucose hypothesis. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT), supported by the National Institute of Diabetes Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), definitively established the benefits and risks of intensive therapy that substantially lowered mean blood glucose levels, measured by HbA1c, over a mean 6.5 years of therapy. Intensive therapy in the DCCT, resulting in a mean HbA1c of ~7% (53 mmol/mol), reduced the development and progression of early microvascular and neurological complications associated with diabetes by 34-76% compared with the conventional-treatment group, which maintained an HbA1c of ~9% (75 mmol/mol). Intensive therapy was also associated with weight gain and a threefold increased risk for hypoglycaemia. At the end of the DCCT, a long-term observational follow-up study, the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study, commenced. Despite the convergence of HbA1c levels between the two groups during EDIC, owing to the adoption of intensive therapy by the original DCCT conventional-treatment group and the return of all participants to their own healthcare providers for diabetes care, the development and progression of complications continued to be substantially less in the original intensive-treatment group vs the conventional-treatment group; this phenomenon was termed 'metabolic memory'. The DCCT demonstrated a major reduction in early-stage complications with intensive therapy and the metabolic memory phenomenon during EDIC contributed to a substantially lower burden of advanced complications over time. These included a 57% lower risk of CVD events and 33% lower rate of mortality in the original intensive-treatment group compared with the conventional-treatment group. DCCT/EDIC has ushered in the intensive-treatment era, which has been universally adopted and includes the goal of achieving HbA1c levels less than 7% (53 mmol/mol) for most patients. Although the challenge of making intensive therapy (with the aim of achieving normoglycaemia) as widely accessible and safe as possible remains, continuing improvements in insulin therapy 100 years after its introduction promise a brighter future for people with type 1 diabetes.