A study of trends and factors associated with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) implementation for arbekacin treatment using a large Japanese medical claims database.

INTRODUCTION: Reimbursements for pharmacist interventions and infectious disease teams have recently been introduced in Japan. Arbekacin (ABK) is used to treat pneumonia and sepsis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended. This study aimed to clarify the trend in TDM implementation for ABK over time and the factors associated with TDM implementation using a claims database. METHODS: Data of patients aged ≥15 years who received ABK for ≥3 consecutive days between 2010 and 2019 were extracted from a large Japanese medical claims database. The proportion of reimbursements claimed for TDM, pharmacist interventions, and the setup of infectious disease teams for each year were calculated. The factors associated with TDM implementation were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The proportion of TDM implementation for ABK increased by 9.1% from 2010 to 2019, but it remained less than 40% throughout this period. The proportion of TDM implementation was higher in patients who claimed reimbursements for pharmacist interventions than in patients who did not. Logistic regression analysis showed that the stationing of pharmacists in wards and long-term ABK treatment were significantly associated with TDM implementation. CONCLUSIONS: From 2010 to 2019, the proportion of TDM implementation for ABK was significantly low. Moreover, the factors associated with TDM implementation were clarified. An environment wherein pharmacists can help implement TDM for patients receiving ABK would be beneficial.

Arbekacin - A Novel Antibiotic for Critical Infections.

Antibiotic resistance is one of the biggest menace to global health. Deaths from Drug-resistant infections is set to escalate exponentially. Pipeline for new antibacterials is almost empty. The World Health Organization has reinforced its warning that to tackle growing threat of antimicrobial resistance, development of a new antibiotics is seriously lacking. Arbekacin is a novel aminoglycoside primarily used in the treatment of infections caused by resistant Staphylococcus Aureus i.e. Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA). Besides MRSA it also demonstrates activity against Enterococci and several Gram negative pathogens such as Klebsiella pneumonia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii including resistant strain. Arbekacin which has been used in Japan and Korea since more than two and half decades has been recently approved in India. This review will examine how Arbekacin evades the common mechanisms of antibiotic resistance, the pharmacokinetics of Arbekacin, and the various pharmacological properties and its spectrum of in vitro activity. The results of clinical trials on Arbekacin are also described, as is the patient safety and tolerability observed during these studies.

Kanamycin and its derivative, arbekacin: significance and impact.

On the occasion of the 60th anniversary of the discovery (1957) of kanamycin (KM), a series of research achievements on KM and its semisynthetic derivative Arbekacin (ABK) are outlined. KM was first used clinically in 1958 and was appreciated for its remarkable curing effect on various bacterial infections, especially tuberculosis. ABK is a KM derivative rationally semisynthesized to overcome KM resistance due to enzymatic phosphorylation and acetylation. Since its approval in 1990 as an anti-MRSA drug, ABK has been and still is effectively used in chemotherapy because MRSA rarely develops high ABK-resistance. Research that illuminated the unique features of ABK enabling it to resist the development of resistance by MRSA are also described.

A Multicentre, Open label, Randomized, Comparative, Parallel Group, Active-controlled, Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Arbekacin Sulphate Injection versus Vancomycin Injection in Patients Diagnosed with MRSA Infection.

BACKGROUND: Increasing resistance to currently available antimicrobials has led to the development of new agents. Arbekacin is aminoglycoside antibiotic currently used in Japan and Korea for the treatment of infections caused by multi-resistant bacteria including MRSA. Currently there is no published data available for use of Arbekacin in Indian patient population, thus the present study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Arbekacin in Indian population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was a phase III, multi-centre, open-label, randomised comparative, active control study. Subjects with microbiologically confirmed MRSA infection were randomized in the study to receive either Arbekacin sulphate 200 mg OD or Vancomycin hydrochloride 1000 mg BD for a period of 7 to 14 days. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the overall cure rate i.e. Clinical and microbiological cure during the study. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients were randomized in 2 treatment groups (i.e. 81 patients in each group). Out of these microbiologically confirmed MRSA patients, 153 patients were admitted for SSTI while 9 patients were admitted for CAP. Overall cure rate of MRSA infection (clinical as well as microbiological cure) was comparable in both the treatment groups i.e. 97.5% (79/81) in Arbekacin group and 100 % (79/79) in Vancomycin group (p value: 0.159). Both Arbekacin and Vancomycin were well tolerated by the patients during the study period. CONCLUSION: Arbekacin can be considered as safe and effective alternative to vancomycin in the management of MRSA infections.

Emergence of ArmA, a 16S rRNA methylase in highly aminoglycoside-resistant clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella oxytoca in Okinawa, Japan.

This study describes highly aminoglycoside-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella oxytoca clinical isolates obtained from an inpatient in Okinawa, Japan, with no known record of traveling overseas. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of amikacin and arbekacin against these strains were >1024 µg/ml. Whole-genome sequencing analysis revealed that these isolates harbored armA, which encodes a 16S rRNA methylase, ArmA, that confers pan-aminoglycoside resistance. This is the second report of K. pneumoniae harboring armA and the first report of K. oxytoca harboring a 16S rRNA methylase encoding gene in Japan.

Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of ME1100, a novel optimized formulation of arbekacin for inhalation, compared with amikacin in a murine model of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Background: Arbekacin is an aminoglycoside that shows strong antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive bacteria, including MRSA, as well as Pseudomonas aeruginosa . The therapeutic effectiveness of arbekacin is directly related to C max at the infection site. To maximize drug delivery to the respiratory tract and minimize the systemic toxicity, arbekacin optimized for inhalation, ME1100, is under development. In this study, we investigated the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of ME1100 in a murine model of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by P. aeruginosa by using a customized investigational nebulizer system. Methods: The mice were treated for 5 min, once daily, with placebo, 3, 10 or 30 mg/mL ME1100 or 30 mg/mL amikacin. Results: In the survival study, the survival rate was significantly improved in the 10 and 30 mg/mL ME1100 treatment groups compared with that in the placebo group. The number of bacteria in the lungs was significantly lower in the 30 mg/mL ME1100 treatment group at 6 h after the initial treatment, compared with all other groups. In the pharmacokinetic study, the C max in the 30 mg/mL ME1100 treatment group in the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and plasma was 31.1 and 1.2 mg/L, respectively. Furthermore, we compared the efficacy of ME1100 with that of amikacin. Although there were no significant differences in ELF and plasma concentrations between 30 mg/mL of ME1100 and 30 mg/mL of amikacin, ME1100 significantly improved the survival rate compared with amikacin. Conclusions: The results of our study demonstrated the in vivo effectiveness of ME1100 and its superiority to amikacin.

Antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Japanese secondary care facility.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is prevalent in Japan, and the Staphylococcus cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type II is common among hospital-acquired MRSA isolates. Information pertaining to MRSA characteristics is limited, including SCCmec types, in primary or secondary care facilities. A total of 128 MRSA isolates (90 skin and soft tissue isolates and 38 blood isolates) were collected at a secondary care facility, Kawatana Medical Center, from 2005 to 2011. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for anti-MRSA antibiotics and molecular testing for SCCmec and virulence genes (tst, sec, etb, lukS/F-PV) were performed. Strains positive for lukS/F-PV were analyzed by multilocus sequence typing and phage open-reading frame typing. SCCmec typing in skin and soft tissue isolates revealed that 65.6% had type IV, 22.2% had type II, 8.9% had type I, and 3.3% had type III. In blood isolates, 50.0% had type IV, 47.4% had type II, and 2.6% had type III. Minimum inhibitory concentrations, MIC(50)/MIC(90), against vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, and arbekacin increased slightly in SCCmec II isolates from skin and soft tissue. MICs against daptomycin were similar between sites of isolation. SCCmec type II isolates possess tst and sec genes at a greater frequently than SCCmec type IV isolates. Four lukS/F-PV-positive isolates were divided into two clonal patterns and USA300 was not included. In conclusion, SCCmec type IV was dominant in blood, skin, and soft tissue isolates in a secondary care facility in Japan. Because antimicrobial susceptibility varies with the SCCmec type, SCCmec typing of clinical isolates should be monitored in primary or secondary care facilities.

[Genetic Diagnosis and Molecular Therapies for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy].

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is the most common form of inherited muscle disease and is characterized by progressive muscle wasting, ultimately resulting in the death of patients in their twenties or thirties. DMD is characterized by a deficiency of the muscle dystrophin as a result of mutations in the dystrophin gene. Currently, no effective treatment for DMD is available. Promising molecular therapies which are mutation-specific have been developed. Transformation of an out-of-frame mRNA into an in-frame dystrophin message by inducing exon skipping is considered one of the approaches most likely to lead to success. We demonstrated that the intravenous administration of the antisense oligonucleotide against the splicing enhancer sequence results in exon skipping and production of the dystrophin protein in DMD case for the first time. After extensive studies, anti-sense oligonucleotides comprising different monomers have undergone clinical trials and provided favorable results, enabling improvements in ambulation of DMD patients. Induction of the read-through of nonsense mutations is expected to produce dystrophin in DMD patients with nonsense mutations, which are detected in 19% of DMD cases. The clinical effectiveness of gentamicin and PTC124 has been reported. We have demonstrated that arbekacin-mediated read-through can markedly ameliorate muscular dystrophy in vitro. We have already begun a clinical trial of nonsense mutation read-through therapy using arbekacin. Some of these drug candidates are planned to undergo submission for approval to regulatory agencies in the US and EU. We hope that these molecular therapies will contribute towards DMD treatment.

[Evaluation of six cases of arbekacin inhalation for pneumonia].

Arbekacin (ABK) is one of aminoglycosides which has indications for septicemia and pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Japan. ABK shows good clinical and microbiological efficacies also against Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In addition, furthermore, ABK would be sometimes effective also against antimicrobial-resistant GNB. We investigated ABK inhalation, which showed good pulmonary drug delivery, for the treatment of pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms and MRSA. Six patients with pneumonia were treated with ABK inhalation therapy (50 mg x three times/day). We observed clinical effect for multidrug-resistant organisms in 6/6 patients. Although routine use of aerosolized antibiotics might not be able to be recommended for multidrug-resistant organisms, we might be able to adopt the ABK inhalation therapy for pneumonia especially caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms in some situations where systemic therapy alone might be failure or inadequate, or where intravenous access is not available because of systemic toxicity. Further studies would be needed for ABK inhalation therapy for pneumonia.

Clinical practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of arbekacin: a consensus review of the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Arbekacin (ABK) was approved and widely used in Japan for treatment of patients infected with MRSA, and TDM was introduced in clinical practice. The Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring decided to develop a clinical practice guidelines for TDM of ABK for the following reasons. First, although the daily dose of 150-200 mg was approved in Japan, recent PK-PD studies revealed that higher serum concentration is required to achieve better clinical efficacy and several findings concerning the usefulness of higher dosage regimen have obtained recently. Second, although maximal concentrations that obtained immediately after the end of administration (Cmax) was generally adopted, the serum concentration at 1 h after initiation of administration [peak serum concentration (Cpeak)] proved to be more suitable as an efficacy indicator of aminoglycosides. Lastly, as ABK is approved only in Japan, no international practice guideline for TDM has not been available in ABK to date. This guideline evaluated the scientific data associated with serum ABK monitoring and provided recommendations based on the available evidence. Potential limitations of this guideline, however, include the findings that few prospective clinical trials of TDM of ABK are available in the treatment of MRSA infections and that most of the published literature describes observational studies.

Clinical efficacy and safety of arbekacin sulfate in patients with MRSA sepsis or pneumonia: a multi-institutional study.

Arbekacin (ABK) is an aminoglycoside and widely used in Japan for treatment of patients infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Although, ABK has concentration-dependent antibacterial activity, the peak serum concentration (C (peak)) of ABK has not yet been fully investigated as an indicator of the efficacy of ABK. The present study was conducted in patients admitted to hospitals affiliated with the ABK Dose Finding Study Group, between October 2008 and June 2011, who had pneumonia or sepsis, the cause of which was identified or suspected to be MRSA. The initial target C (peak) was set at 15-20 µg/mL and therapeutic drug monitoring was conducted. Then the relationship between serum concentration and efficacy/safety of ABK was prospectively examined to obtain sufficient clinical efficacy. In total, 89 patients from 11 clinical sites in Japan were enrolled and 29 of these patients were subjected to efficacy analysis. The mean initial dose and C (peak) were 306.9 mg/day and 16.2 µg/mL, respectively. The efficacy rate was 95 % (19/20 patients) at 5-6 mg/kg or higher, 87.5 % (7/8) for sepsis and 90.5 % (19/21) for pneumonia, and the overall efficacy rate was 89.7 % (26/29). There was no increase in the incidence of adverse events. In conclusion, we recommend the initial dose of ABK at 5-6 mg/kg or higher and the dosage regimen should be adjusted to achieve C (peak) at 10-15 µg/mL or higher in the treatment of patients with pneumonia or sepsis caused by MRSA. This strategy would surely achieve low incidence of adverse events while obtaining high clinical efficacy.

[Clinical investigation of arbekacin sulfate based on Cmax/MIC].

We examined the peck concentration (Cmax)/minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the clinical efficacy in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia and Gram-positive cocci bacteremia. We evaluated arbekacin (ABK) on 22 cases of pneumonia and 10 cases of bacteremia in Aichi Medical University Hospital between August 2008 and July 2011, retrospectively. In pneumonia cases, Cmax/MIC was 16.4 +/- 2.8 in the effective group, and was 17.6 +/- 4.5 in the not effective group, the significant differences were not accepted (p = 0.8). The dosage of ABK was 4.7 +/- 1.4 mg/kg/dose in the effective group and was 4.3 +/- 0.7 mg/kg/dose in the not effective group. In bacteremia cases, Cmax/MIC was 24.2 +/- 13.9 in the effective group and 12.9 +/- 3.9 in the not effective group about clinical efficacy, and the high tendency was accepted by the effective group (p < 0.05). The dosage of ABK was 3.4 +/- 1.1 mg/kg/dose in the effective group, and 3.0 +/- 0.6 mg/kg/dose in the not effective group. In this examination, the significant difference was not observed in clinical efficacy and Cmax/MIC in the pneumonia cases. Although it was reported that clinical efficacy of ABK was given Cmax/MIC at eight or more, in this examination, all cases was eight or more at Cmax/MIC, and the clinical effect was 40.9%. On Cmax/MIC of ABK, clinical effective group was higher than not effective group in bacteremia cases, it was suggested that the administration design should make that Cmax/MIC at least about 14 or more would be necessary.

The efficacy and safety of high-dose arbekacin sulfate therapy (once-daily treatment) in patients with MRSA infection.

The efficacy and safety of once-daily high-dose arbekacin sulfate therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection were evaluated, with analysis of their relationship to blood drug levels. The study was conducted in patients with pneumonia or sepsis, the cause of which was suspected to be MRSA, who were admitted to the Nagasaki University Hospital or its affiliated hospitals between January 2009 and December 2010. The initial drug dose was set at a level expected to yield the goal peak of 20 µg/ml and a trough level of less than 2 µg/ml, using the Habekacin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring analysis software. Thirteen patients were enrolled: 10 patients had pneumonia and 3 patients had sepsis. Patient mean age was 72.0 years; mean initial drug dose was 269.2 mg. Clinical efficacy at completion of treatment and bacterial eradication-reduction were achieved in 66.7% (6/9) and 62.5% (5/8) of patients, respectively. Incidence of adverse reactions was 38.5% (5/13). In analysis of efficacy in relationship to serum drug levels, the peak drug level was 22.7 ± 5.50 µg/ml, on average, and 15 µg/ml or higher in all 6 responders. Also, in patients with renal dysfunction, it seemed to be essential to ensure a certain peak drug level and to control the trough level appropriately. Although the number of patients was limited, once-daily high-dose arbekacin sulfate therapy may be highly effective, without posing any major safety problems. Further larger-scale studies are needed.

Clinical efficacy of arbekacin for Gram-negative bacteria.

In an analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infected patients treated with arbekacin (ABK) only, Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) that were inhibited by low minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of amikacin (AMK) or gentamycin (GM) were eradicated by the end of the ABK treatment. On the other hand, GNB that were only inhibited by high MICs of AMK or GM persisted until the end of treatment with ABK only. Thus, ABK can be expected to be effective even in cases of mixed infection with GNB and MRSA.

Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome in an extremely low-birth-weight neonate: molecular characterization and rapid detection by multiplex and real-time PCR of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome (SSSS), caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) producing exfoliative toxin (ET), is a life-threatening infection for neonates in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). SSSS in extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW) neonates is rare. A new class of MRSA (community-acquired MRSA, CA-MRSA) has been emerging in the community. The aim of this study was to characterize MRSA from an ELBW neonate with SSSS, and to develop rapid detection methods for SSSS-associated and emerging pediatric MRSA. METHODS: An ELBW infant in the NICU developed SSSS on day 16 after birth. Isolated MRSA was genetically characterized and compared with CA-MRSA from bullous impetigo (biCA-MRSA), which is positive for the ET and collagen-adhesin (CNA) genes in many cases, and the Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL) gene rarely. Specific primers and probes for five virulence genes (for ETA, ETB, ETD, PVL, CNA) were designed for multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time PCR. RESULTS: MRSA strain H5 from SSSS exhibited the genotype (ST91, spa416[t375], agr3, SCCmecIVa, CoaI), and possessed the ETB and CNA genes, similar to ST91 biCA-MRSA (albeit with a divergence). Multiplex PCR detected the ETB and CNA genes of strain H5, and real-time PCR detected strain H5 at as low as 10(2) CFU/mL. The assays were 100% specific and 100% sensitive, for the five virulence genes. CONCLUSION: ETB-positive ST91 MRSA, which was very similar to ST91 biCA-MRSA, was isolated from an ELBW infant with SSSS. The multiplex and real-time PCR assays specifically or quantitatively detected SSSS-associated and emerging pediatric MRSA.

Characterization of beta-lactam antibiotic-induced vancomycin-resistant MRSA (BIVR) in a patient with septicemia during long-term vancomycin administration.

It was reported that some methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) show resistance to vancomycin (VCM) and beta-lactam antibiotics; thus, they are termed beta-lactam antibiotic-induced VCM-resistant MRSA (BIVR). The VCM resistance of MRSA is induced by the administration of beta-lactam antibiotics, but this phenomenon can be difficult to detect in the clinical laboratory. We detected the BIVR strain in a 64-year-old man who had had a ventilator tube inserted directly into the windpipe during long-term VCM therapy. The patient was diagnosed with MRSA pneumonia and septicemia on July 5, 2007, and sulbactam/ampicillin (SBT/ABPC) was administered for 5 days. However, the fever recurred, and administration of VCM was resumed for 7 days from July 19. Fever developed again, and VCM was administered again for 14 days from September 30. BIVR and VCM-low-sensitive MRSA were isolated from blood on October 18 and 22, although the VCM trough concentration was 10.2 microg/ml. On October 27, we changed to a combination of fosfomycin (FOM) and arbekacin (ABK), and thereafter the fever quickly decreased and the clinical symptoms abated. We isolated five MRSA strains from the blood of the patient, three strains of VCM-sensitive MRSA, one strain of BIVR, and one strain of a VCM-low-sensitive MRSA. The DNA band patterns determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis were completely identical except for the VCM-low-sensitive MRSA, which was missing one band. Furthermore, the VCM-low-sensitive MRSA became sensitive to beta-lactam antibiotics. Our results indicate the possibility that long-term VCM therapy is one of the factors that allow BIVR or VCM-low-sensitive MRSA to emerge, and this allows VCM therapy for MRSA to fail.