No evidence of pathogenicity of Dientamoeba fragilis following detection in stools: A case-control study.

Dientamoeba fragilis is a ubiquitous intestinal parasite with detection in the stools that has become increasingly frequent following the advent of PCR as a routine screening tool. However, the pathogenicity of this parasite is still much debated. In order to assess the potentially pathogenic nature of this protozoan, a retrospective case-control study was carried out between January and December 2020 on patients from Toulouse University Hospital, with the aim of evaluating the potential clinical effects and changes in laboratory parameters linked to the presence and load of D. fragilis in stools. After matching age, sex and mode of care (consultation or hospitalisation), no significant difference was observed in the frequency of clinical signs between the 36 patients who tested positive for Dientamoeba fragilis PCR in their stools and the 72 control patients who were PCR negative for this protozoan. The presence of D. fragilis in the faeces was not associated with changes in laboratory parameters. Furthermore, a high digestive load of D. fragilis had no identifiable impact on clinical and laboratory parameters. Only the concomitant presence of Blastocystis sp. in stools was significantly more frequent in the D. fragilis group (uni- and multivariate analysis). Finally, this study showed no significant difference in clinical or laboratory signs between patients carrying Dientamoeba fragilis and the control group, regardless of the intestinal parasite load, suggesting that D. fragilis could be considered a commensal of the digestive tract.

Title: Aucune preuve de la pathogénicité de Dientamoeba fragilis détecté dans les selles : une étude cas-témoins. Abstract: Dientamoeba fragilis est un parasite digestif ubiquitaire dont la détection dans les selles est devenue de plus en plus fréquente avec l'avènement de la PCR comme outil de détection de routine. Cependant, la pathogénicité de ce parasite est encore très discutée. Afin d'évaluer le caractère potentiellement pathogène de ce protozoaire, une étude rétrospective cas-témoins a été réalisée entre janvier et décembre 2020 sur des patients du CHU de Toulouse, dans le but d'évaluer les effets cliniques et biologiques potentiels associés à la présence et à la charge de D. fragilis dans les selles. Après appariement sur l'âge, le sexe et le mode de prise en charge (consultation ou hospitalisation), aucune différence significative n'a été observée dans la fréquence des signes cliniques entre les 36 patients testés positifs pour la PCR de Dientamoeba fragilis dans les selles et les 72 patients témoins avec une PCR négative pour ce protozoaire. La présence de D. fragilis dans les selles n'était pas associée à des modifications des paramètres biologiques. De plus, une charge digestive élevée de D. fragilis n'avait pas d'impact identifiable sur les paramètres cliniques et biologiques. Seule la présence concomitante de Blastocystis sp. dans les selles était significativement plus fréquente dans le groupe D. fragilis (analyse uni- et multivariée). En conclusion, cette étude n'a pas montré de différence significative concernant les signes cliniques ou biologiques entre les patients porteurs de Dientamoeba fragilis et le groupe témoin, quelle que soit la charge parasitaire digestive, indiquant que D. fragilis pourrait être considéré comme un commensal du tube digestif.

A tale of two studies: is peripheral eosinophilia associated with Dientamoeba fragilis detection in adult stool samples?

The protozoan parasite Dientamoeba fragilis is a frequently isolated stool organism and postulated cause of gastrointestinal symptoms. Peripheral blood eosinophilia has been described. This is the first study amongst the Australasian adult population to assess the relationship between organism detection and eosinophilia. A case-control study took place over 7 years at a single Sydney laboratory site, evaluating patients with D. fragilis identified on stool using real-time PCR with a recent full blood count, to control groups with Giardia spp. and sequential negatives with neither organism. A nested study compared those with microscopic evidence of D. fragilis as a marker of disease burden, to molecular diagnosis alone. Sixty-four D. fragilis, 30 Giardia spp., and 94 sequential controls were enrolled. Only 60.1% of samples were preserved in sodium acetate-acetic acid formalin (SAF) fixative, indication mostly not documented. The major co-organism detected amongst all participants was Blastocystis sp., particularly in the D. fragilis cohort (37.2%). The most common pathogen amongst sequential controls was Campylobacter spp. (7.4%). Patients with D. fragilis were more likely (12.5%) to have a clinically significant eosinophilia (>0.5×109/L) compared to those with Giardia spp. (3.3%) or sequential controls (4.3%) (p=0.03). A significant difference was also noted in the overall median eosinophil count of those with D. fragilis versus all controls (0.2 vs 0.1×109/L, p=0.01); however, this was within the reference interval (where up to >0.5×109/L is accepted in healthy individuals within a typical population). No eosinophil difference was found between those with molecular versus additional microscopic detection of D. fragilis (0.1 vs 0.1×109/L). These results support an association between the identification of clinically significant peripheral blood eosinophilia and D. fragilis presence, which may impact the diagnostic approach to the patient with unexplained eosinophilia. Further prospective trials may help assess any significance further and the implication of co-carriage with other enteric organisms. The importance of clinical indication and need for appropriate fixative media in diagnostic parasitology are also highlighted.

Detection of Blastocystis sp. and Dientamoeba fragilis using conventional and molecular methods in patients with celiac disease.

Blastocystis sp. and Dientamoeba fragilis are intestinal protists, which are common worldwide, but the pathogenic role of these organisms in gastrointestinal diseases is still controversial. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of Blastocystis sp. and D. fragilis in stool samples from adult patients with celiac disease (CD) by using conventional and molecular methods. A total of 75 patients with CD and 75 healthy individuals were included in this study. Fresh stool specimens collected from each individual were analyzed by conventional and molecular methods. The overall prevalence of Blastocystis sp. and D. fragilis was 41.3% (31/75) and 24% (18/75) in patients with CD, and 46.7% (35/75) and 13.3% (10/75) in healthy controls, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of Blastocystis sp. and D. fragilis between CD patients and healthy individuals. Blastocystis sp. subtypes were identified in 20 CD and 16 control patients and the overall subtype distribution was observed as ST1 13.9%, ST2 30.6%, and ST3 55.6%. The prevalence of Blastocystis sp. and D. fragilis in adults with CD is similar to the prevalence of protozoa in healthy adults. In this study, the most prevalent Blastocystis subtype was ST3 and the most frequent allele was a34 in both CD patients and healthy individuals. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of the detection rates of Blastocystis sp. and D. fragilis, and it is thought that both protists may be colonisers of the intestinal microbiome.

A Cross-Sectional Study on the Occurrence of the Intestinal Protist, Dientamoeba fragilis, in the Gut-Healthy Volunteers and Their Animals.

Dientamoeba fragilis is a cosmopolitan intestinal protist colonizing the human gut with varying prevalence depending on the cohort studied and the diagnostic methods used. Its role in human health remains unclear mainly due to the very sporadic number of cross-sectional studies in gut-healthy populations. The main objective of this study was to expand knowledge of the epidemiology of D. fragilis in gut-healthy humans and their animals. A total of 296 stool samples from humans and 135 samples from 18 animal species were analyzed. Using qPCR, a prevalence of 24% was found in humans in contrast to conventional PCR (7%). In humans, several factors were found to influence the prevalence of D. fragilis. A more frequent occurrence of D. fragilis was associated with living in a village, traveling outside Europe and contact with farm animals. In addition, co-infection with Blastocystis spp. was observed in nearly half of the colonized humans. In animals, D. fragilis was detected in 13% of samples from eight species using qPCR. Our molecular phylogenies demonstrate a more frequent occurrence of Genotype 1 in gut-healthy humans and also revealed a likely a new protist species/lineage in rabbits related to D. fragilis and other related organisms.

Should Dientamoeba fragillis be looked for in pediatric digestive pathology of an unknown cause? A proposed pilot case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: Dientamoeba (D.) fragilis is a common intestinal protozoan with an unresolved clinical significance. The association between D. fragilis and the etiology of gastrointestinal symptoms in children is unclear. Metronidazole is often used for treatment. The aims of this study are to clarify the clinical relevance of D. fragilis in children with gastrointestinal symptoms, and to determine the clinical and microbiological efficacy of metronidazole in D. fragilis-infected children with gastrointestinal complaints. METHODS: A prospective case-control study was performed from October 2017 to February 2019. A total of 106 individuals aged 1-17 were included. Out of the 106; 59 showed gastrointestinal symptoms (case group), and 47 were without gastrointestinal symptoms (control group). We excluded 2 patients from the case group. D. fragilis was diagnosed by real-time PCR in stool samples. A 10-day course of oral Metronidazole was prescribed in D. fragilis positive children with GI symptoms. Clinical data before and after the treatment as well as peripheral eosinophilia in previous blood samples, were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 104 participants, D. fragilis was found in 17 (29.8%) children from the case group, whereas in the control group the parasite was detected in 11 patients (23.4%) with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.39 (IC 95% 0.53-3.75, p=0.46). The most prevalent clinical manifestation was abdominal pain (46/57, 80.7%). Seventeen cases with a positive PCR received anti-parasitic treatment according to the established protocol, although during the collection period we received only 11 stool samples to perform the post-treatment follow-up. The PCR of the D. fragilis remained positive in 3 patients (3/11, 27.27%). Despite achieving the eradication of the parasite, 4/8 patients (50%) continued with digestive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: According to our study there were no differences between the D. fragilis infection in children with or without gastrointestinal symptoms. No relation was found between the clinical and microbiological responses after said D. fragilis treatment. Therefore, we conclude that it is not justified to look specifically for D fragilis in pediatric patients with abdominal symptoms.

First detection and molecular characterization of Dientamoeba fragilis in cattle.

Dientamoeba fragilis is a flagellated protozoan with amoeba-like morphology that inhabits the human gastrointestinal tract. It is endemic in a vast geography around the world, including developed countries. There are limited studies on non-human hosts of the parasite, and suitable hosts have not been clarified. The parasite has been detected in non-human primates, pigs, cats, dogs and rats. There is no study in the literature investigating and detecting the presence of this parasite in cattle. In this study, stool samples taken from 163 different cattle and calves from 11 different farms between March 2017 and May 2022 were examined for the detection of D. fragilis via PCR. Trichrome staining was performed on all PCR-positive samples. The isolates with the expected amplicon size were sequenced using the 18S ribosomal RNA region, and their genotypes were determined by BLAST analysis. Sequences were analysed with the most similar and reference sequences in the literature, forming a phylogenetic tree. We detected D. fragilis in 31 (19.01%) of the 163 stool samples. D. fragilis cysts/trophozoites were detected by trichrome staining method in six of 31 samples. All PCR products selected for molecular analysis from positive samples had the same nucleotide sequence. As a result of BLAST analysis, all sequences were determined to belong to D. fragilis genotype 1. This study determined for the first time that cattle are suitable hosts for D. fragilis. Furthermore, the parasite subtype we detected belongs to genotype 1, which is the most common type in humans, suggesting that the parasite may have a zoonotic character. Our result is important in terms of the epidemiology of the parasite, as the mode of transmission is controversial, and available data on its suitable hosts are limited.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Considerations Towards Dientamoeba fragilis in Children: A Survey Amongst General Practitioners and Pediatricians in the Netherlands.

ABSTRACT: This survey was undertaken to obtain insight in the attitude of Dutch physicians towards pathogenicity, diagnostic- and therapeutic approach towards Dientamoeba fragilis in children. Physicians were invited by e-mail for a questionnaire. A total of 211 of 450 physicians (46.9%) completed the questionnaire, including 67 general practitioners (GPs) and 144 pediatricians. Of all respondents, 175 of 211 (82.9%) considered D fragilis a "potential pathogen", when other causes of gastro-intestinal complaints are ruled out. Only 16 of 211 (7.6%) performed diagnostic tests regularly. Diagnostic tests were performed by 162 of 211 (77%) of respondents in children with diarrhea and abdominal pain in consideration of duration of symptoms. Fecal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was diagnostic modality of preference. Eighty-nine of 142 (62.7%) prescribed metronidazole as antibiotic of first choice. This study shows heterogeneity in clinical practice amongst Dutch physicians regarding diagnostic- and therapeutic approach of D fragilis in children. Different attitude towards pathogenicity and inconsistent guidelines could be causative factors.

Investigation of Dientamoeba fragilis Frequency in Faecal Samples of Patients with Enterobius vermicularis Infection by Polymerase Chain Reaction

Objective: Dientamoeba fragilis (D. fragilis) is a flagellated protozoan with an amoeba-like morphology, located in the gastrointestinal tract. The hypothesis was that the parasite was transported by Enterobius vermicularis (E. vermicularis) eggs. This study aimed to determine the association of D. fragilis and E. vermicularis with the genotypes of the identified strain of D. fragilis. Results of trichrome staining were compared with those of polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which is widely used in the diagnosis of D. fragilis. Methods: A total of 391 samples were obtained. The stool and cellophane slide samples were sent together to the Parasitology Department Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, between 1 October 2017 and 1 October 2018. Stool samples of all patients with E. vermicularis (n=74) and without E. vermicularis (n=74) infection were used. All samples were examined for the presence of D. fragilis by trichrome staining and PCR. The 18S ribosomal RNA region of D. fragilis isolates was sequenced. Demographic characteristics and clinical findings of the patients were evaluated. Results: D. fragilis was detected in 42 (28.37%) of 148 samples; 28 (66.6%) of them were detected in patients with E. vermicularis infection. The coexistence of two parasites was significant (p<0.05). All isolates sequenced were genotype 1. No significant relationship was found between the presence of parasites and clinical findings, living area and gender (p>0.05). Conclusion: D. fragilis is frequently associated with E. vermicularis, so the presence of D. fragilis should be also considered in affected patients. The use of high-sensitivity molecular methods such as PCR is important in preventing false results. Amaç: Dientamoeba fragilis (D. fragilis), amip benzeri morfolojiye sahip, gastrointestinal yerlesimli, kamçili bir protozoondur. Parazitin Enterobius vermicularis (E. vermicularis) yumurtalariyla tasindigi hipotezi kabul görmektedir. Çalismamizda D. fragilis ve E. vermicularis birlikteligini incelemek, bulunan D. fragilis'lerin genotiplerini belirlemek ve D. fragilis tanisinda yaygin olarak kullanilan trikrom boyama ile polimeraz zincir reaksiyon (PZR) yöntemlerini karsilastirmak amaçlanmistir. Yöntemler: Çalismamizda Aydin Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi, Parazitoloji Laboratuvari'na 1 Ekim 2017-1 Ekim 2018 tarihleri arasinda diski ve selofan lam örnegi birlikte gönderilmis toplam 391 olgu örnegi incelenmistir. Selofanli lam örneklerinde E. vermicularis saptanan tüm gönüllü olgularin (74 olgu) diski örnegi ile E. vermicularis negatif 74 olgunun diski örnegi çalisilmistir. Tüm diskilar trikrom boyama ve PZR yöntemleri ile D. fragilis varligi açisindan incelenmistir. Saptanan D. fragilis izolatlarinin 18S ribozomal RNA bölgesi sekanslanmistir. Olgularin demografik özellikleri ve klinigi degerlendirilmistir. Bulgular: Toplam 148 olgunun 42'sinde (%28,37) D. fragilis saptanmistir. D. fragilis pozitif olan 42 olgunun %66,6'sini E. vermicularis pozitif olgular olusturmus ve iki parazitin birlikteligi anlamli bulunmustur (p<0,05). Sekanslanan tüm izolatlar genotip 1 olarak saptanmistir. Klinik bulgular, yasanilan bölge ve cinsiyet ile parazit varligi arasinda anlamli bir iliski saptanamamistir (p>0,05). Sonuç: Arastirmamizda D. fragilis'in siklikla E. vermicularis ile birliktelik gösterdigi ve bu olgularda D. fragilis varligina ayrica dikkat edilmesi gerektigi vurgulanmistir. Yanlis sonuçlari engellemede, yüksek duyarliliga sahip PZR gibi yöntemlerin önemi bir kez daha görülmüstür.

Prevalence and genetic characterization of Dientamoeba fragilis in asymptomatic children attending daycare centers.

In order to provide additional data on the prevalence and genetic diversity of Dientamoeba fragilis in human populations, we conducted a study in children from low-income communities in Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Fecal samples from daycare center attendees up to 6 years old (n=156) and staff members (n=18) were submitted to PCR and sequencing of D. fragilis as well as to microscopic examination for the presence of other intestinal parasites. All children assessed were asymptomatic and 10.3% (16/156) were positive for D. fragilis. No worker was found to be positive. An association between Dientamoeba and coinfection with other intestinal parasites was observed. Concerning the genetic diversity, 14 and only two isolates were genotype 1 and genotype 2, respectively. Our findings outline interesting aspects: (1) asymptomatic children as carriers of Dientamoeba in communities in which environmental conditions ensure parasite transmission and, (2) association between Dientamoeba infection in young children and coinfection with other enteric parasites, reinforcing its transmission via the fecal-oral route.

Diagnosis of intestinal protozoan infections in patients in Cuba by microscopy and molecular methods: advantages and disadvantages.

Microscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis of intestinal parasitic diseases in many countries, including Cuba, although molecular approaches often have higher sensitivity as well as other advantages. Fecal samples from 133 patients were analyzed by light microscopy and also real-time multiplex qPCR targeting Giardia duodenalis, Cryptosporidium spp., and Entamoeba histolytica, and, separately, Dientamoeba fragilis. Microscopy revealed G. duodenalis occurred most commonly (17 patients), followed by Blastocystis spp. (12 patients). In a few patients, Entamoeba histolytica/E. dispar, Cryptosporidium spp., and Cyclospora cayetanensis were identified. Molecular analysis identified 4 more G. duodenalis infections and 2 more Cryptosporidium spp. infections; concordance between microscopy and PCR showed almost perfect agreement for G. duodenalis (κ = 0.88) and substantial agreement for Cryptosporidium (κ = 0.74). PCR indicated that E. dispar, rather than E. histolytica, had been identified by microscopy. Additionally, 16 D. fragilis infections were detected using molecular methods. Although both microscopy and molecular techniques have a place in parasitology diagnostics, for parasites such as D. fragilis, where microscopy can underestimate occurrence, molecular techniques may be preferable, and also essential for distinguishing between morphologically similar microorganisms such as E. histolytica and E. dispar. Although in resource-constrained countries such as Cuba, microscopy is extremely important as a diagnostic tool for intestinal parasites, inclusion of molecular techniques could be invaluable for selected protozoa.

Dientamoeba fragilis in children: a systematic review on diagnostic considerations and efficacy of treatment.

Introduction: The presence of D. fragilis in feces is characterized by an asymptomatic carrier ship to a spectrum of gastrointestinal symptoms. However, a causal relationship remains to be elucidated. In this systematic review, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between the eradication of D. fragilis and symptoms to establish the strength of evidence that D. fragilis in symptomatic children warrants antibiotic treatment.Areas covered: This systematic review covers a challenge in daily clinical practice. Is it necessary to test for D. fragilis in children with gastrointestinal symptoms and does a positive fecal PCR test warrant treatment?Expert opinion: Testing for D. fragilis seems justified in a selection of children with persistent unexplained chronic abdominal pain and diarrhea. Treatment of D. fragilis should be withhold until other causes like celiac disease have been excluded. Both microscopic and Real Time-PCR methods (or a combination of the two) can be used for diagnosis. Paromomycin or clioquinol are antibiotics of choice based on their small spectrum of activity, fewer side effects, and better eradication rates than metronidazole. Future randomized studies, with strict inclusion criteria, appropriate diagnostic testing, and doses of antibiotics based on bodyweight are warranted.

Fecal calprotectin as a factor that supports the pathogenicity of Dientamoeba fragilis.

Calprotectin is a protein that is mostly released from neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages and submucosal epithelial cells. Fecal calprotectin (f-CP) is a marker of intestinal inflammation. There are some discussions about the pathogenicity of D. fragilis in the gastrointestinal tract. In this study, we investigated whether f-CP level is a factor supporting the pathogenicity of D. fragilis. The f-CP levels were evaluated in patients with only D. fragilis positive in comparison with healthy controls. Moreover, the levels of f-CP were investigated in fecal samples of D. fragilis negative patients with gastrointestinal complaints. The fecal samples were collected from three groups. Three groups of fecal samples were examined directly microscopy, trichrome staining, cultivation, enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and real-time PCR assay. In the first group (Group 1, n = 34), patient stool samples with gastrointestinal symptoms (without other pathogens) found only with D. fragilis were included. In the second group (Group 2, n = 31), there were patients' stool samples with gastrointestinal symptoms that D. fragilis was negative (but there may be other pathogenic agents). In the control group (Group 3, n = 23), we used fecal samples collected from healthy volunteers without any infection or gastrointestinal complaints. The collected fecal samples were stored at -20 °C until analysis. Levels of f-CP were determined by using human calprotectin ELISA kits. Total of 88 patients were enrolled in three different groups. We obtained f-CP levels as follows: 33.40 ng/mg protein in the group 1, 15.99 ng/mg protein in the group 2 and 1.54 ng/mg protein in the group 3. Statistically significant difference in f-CP levels of the group 1 and the group 2 were obtained when compared with healthy controls (p < 0.0001). However, the f-CP levels of the group 1 were not significantly different from the group 2 (p > 0.99). In conclusion, increased levels of f-CP are shown as a marker of an inflammatory disease of the lower gastrointestinal tract in infected humans. There is continues controversy about the pathogenicity of D. fragilis in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The findings of this study contribute to the ongoing debate about the pathogenicity of D. fragilis. In our study, the potential pathogenicity of D. fragilis is associated with increased f-CP concentrations with parasite detection in the fecal samples and therefore we assume that the parasite is not only a harmless commensal. In summary, higher levels of f-CP found in D. fragilis positive patients suggest the importance of researches that support the pathogenicity of indicated parasite.

The importance of considering the neglected intestinal protozoan parasite Dientamoeba fragilis.

Dientamoebiasis is globally distributed and detected in a large number of subjects with diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, flatulence, fatigue and loss of appetite. The life cycle and transmission of Dientamoeba fragilis are poorly understood. Microscopic examination of permanent stained smears is traditionally employed to diagnose the infection. However, this approach is time-consuming and the success in detecting D. fragilis depends on the microscopist's experience. Hence, only a few laboratories routinely carry out tests for D. fragilis. Consequently, the prevalence of D. fragilis infection is probably underestimated. Although novel, rapid and more sensitive diagnostic tests are becoming available for detecting intestinal parasites, they also possess some limitations. The aim of this study was to emphasize the importance of performing microscopic examination of permanent stained smears from at least one fresh stool specimen after sample arrival at the laboratory, as a mandatory practice for the diagnosis of dientamoebiasis, particulary where it is not possible to perform molecular assays.

Comparison and Recommendations for Use of Dientamoeba fragilis Real-Time PCR Assays.

Dientamoeba fragilis is a gastrointestinal trichomonad parasite whose pathogenicity is yet to be determined. The difficulty involved in microscopically diagnosing D. fragilis in feces led to the development of real-time PCR methodologies for the detection of D. fragilis in stool samples. Prevalence studies in Europe show much higher levels of infection where a laboratory-developed real-time assay is the predominant assay for the detection of Dientamoeba fragilis than in regions that use the EasyScreen assay for detection of gastrointestinal pathogens. The aim of this study was to compare a commercially available Dientamoeba fragilis assay (Genetic Signatures EasyScreen assay) to a widely used laboratory-developed real-time PCR method. Two hundred fifty fecal samples were screened using the laboratory-developed real-time assay on four real-time PCR platforms producing a number of discrepant results. Limit-of-detection studies were undertaken to attempt to resolve sensitivity for each platform tested. The presence or absence of Dientamoeba fragilis DNA in discrepant samples was shown using PCR amplicon next-generation sequencing. Eukaryotic 18S diversity profiling was conducted on discrepant samples to identify the presence or absence of additional protozoan species in samples that may be responsible for cross-reactivity seen in these samples. The results revealed the potential for multiple false-positive results when using the laboratory-developed real-time assay across multiple real-time platforms using manufacturer default settings. This report provides recommendations to resolve these issues where possible and suggestions for future prevalence studies, and it emphasizes the EasyScreen assay as the molecular method of choice as well as the need for standardization of detection assays across all nations screening for D. fragilis.

No association between abdominal pain and Dientamoeba in Dutch and Belgian children.

OBJECTIVE: To study the association between Dientamoebafragilis colonisation and faecal calprotectin to see whether the parasite is a harmless commensal or a gut pathogen. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of previously collected stool samples. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Two hundred stool samples originated from children aged 5-19 years with chronic abdominal pain and diarrhoea, who were seen in paediatric clinics in the Netherlands and Belgium and in whom somatic gastrointestinal disorders were excluded. Another 122 samples came from a healthy community-based reference population of the same age. All stool samples were analysed with real-time PCR for the detection of D. fragilis and with an ELISA for calprotectin-a biomarker of gastrointestinal inflammation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of D. fragilis colonisation and results of stool calprotectin testing. RESULTS: D. fragilis was detected in 45% (95% CI 38% to 51%) of patients and in 71% (95% CI 63% to 79%) of healthy children. Median (IQR) concentrations of calprotectin in patients and healthy children with a positive PCR result were not different from those with a negative PCR result (40 (40-55) µg/g vs 40 (40-75) µg/g, respectively). CONCLUSION: Since D. fragilis colonisation is most prevalent in healthy children and is not associated with an increase in faecal calprotectin concentration, our data do not support the inference that D. fragilis is a pathogenic parasite. Routinely testing for D. fragilis in children with chronic abdominal pain should therefore be discouraged.

Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of Dientamoeba fragilis infection.

INTRODUCTION: The characteristics of D. fragilis infection are described, with special focus on the clinical and epidemiological aspects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective and descriptive study was performed, including all the patients with Dientamoeba fragilis infection who attended a specialized unit between January 2012 and December 2017. PCR was used to diagnose D. fragilis. Patients were treated with metronidazole or paromomycin and reviewed at four and eight weeks post-treatment. Cure was defined as the negativization of all parasitological tests, in absence of symptoms. RESULTS: 163 patients were diagnosed. The most frequent symptoms were abdominal pain (36.2%), chronic diarrhoea (12.3%), anal itching (10.4%), abdominal discomfort (9.2%), skin disease (8%), acute diarrhoea (4.3%) and vomiting (4.3%). Fifty patients were asymptomatic. Forty-two patients had eosinophilia in blood. Thirty-eight cases (23.3%) had a coinfection by Enterobius vermicularis. One hundred and seven patients received treatment, sixty-one of them with metronidazole and the rest with paromomycin. Ninety-nine patients (91%) were cured. The rate of cure was 100% in the paromomycin group versus 86.8% in the metronidazole group (p=0.005; OR: 1.173 [1.057-1.302]). The absence of cure was associated with E. vermicularis coinfection (p=0.014; OR: 6.167 [1.432-26.563] and with longer duration of the symptoms (175 [±159SD]) versus 84 [±88SD] days, p=0.014) but multivariable analysis did not confirm these associations. CONCLUSION: Dientamoeba fragilis is an important and underestimated cause of gastrointestinal disease in both the autochthonous and immigrant or traveller population. More studies are needed to clarify its optimal treatment and the role played by E. vermicularis in its transmission and maintenance.

A clinical guideline on Dientamoeba fragilis infections.

Dientamoeba fragilis (D. fragilis) is an intestinal parasite frequently detected in humans with abdominal pain and diarrhoea, but it is also commonly found in asymptomatic subjects. Hence its clinical relevance is often disputed. The introduction of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a versatile and sensitive diagnostic technique for the detection of intestinal parasites, and in some Western world countries PCR has almost completely replaced microscopic diagnostics. PCR has however resulted in an increase in the number of D. fragilis-positive patients. The disputed pathogenic nature of this intestinal parasite and an apparent increase in the incidence of patients with positive PCR results have renewed the discussions between clinicians and microbiologists on how to deal with an infected patient. Moreover, treatment guidelines differ throughout the world which makes it difficult for clinicians to choose an optimal therapeutic regimen.AimTo summarize and discuss the current knowledge on the pathogenicity, best diagnostic approach, treatment and follow-up of children and adults infected with D. fragilis.

[Dientamoeba fragilis infection in patients with gastrointestinal system complaints]. / Gastrointestinal sikayeti olan hastalarda dientamoeba fragilis enfeksiyonu.

In this study, we aimed to investigate the incidence of Dientamoeba fragilis with different diagnostic methods in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms and determine the sensitivity and specificity of existing diagnostic methods. Fecal samples collected from 101 patients with gastrointestinal complaints (especially upper abdominal pain, abdominal and pelvic pain, nausea and vomiting, gastroenteritis and colitis, unexplained fever and diarrhea) and 20 control cases from various clinics were included in the study. Samples were first examined with native-Lugol (N-L) method and cultured in Robinson medium. All 121 stool and culture samples were stained with iron hematoxylin stain (IHS) and trichrome stain (TS) methods and examined by PCR and QPCR for D.fragilis. Among 121 stool samples 13 (10.7%), 2 (1.7%), 7 (5.7%) 13 (10.7%), and 7 (5.8%), 4 (3.3%), 2 (1.7%), 3 (2.5%) of cultured samples were determined positive with IHS, TS, PCR, QPCR respectively. Fifteen of the 121 stool samples were determined as diarrheal. All diarrheal stool samples were negative with IHS and TS. One of the diarrheal stools and 6 (4.9%) of the non-diarrheal stools were positive by PCR. All of the diarrheal stools were negative. Thirteen of the non-diarrheal stool samples (10.7%) were positive by QPCR. When the QPCR method was considered as gold standard, sensitivity and specificity values were determined as 46% and 93% in IHS, 0% and 99% in TS, 54% and 100% by PCR and sensitivity and specificity values were 67% and 96% in IHS, 33% and 98% in TS, 67% and 100% by PCR among cultured stool samples. As a result, it was determined that there was a statistically significant difference between the samples of the patients and the control groups and the sensitivity and specificity of the conventional and molecular methods (IHS, TS, PCR and QPCR) determined in this study supported the results of other compared studies. It has been determined that staining methods used for the diagnosis of D.fragilis gave false positivite or negativite results. In addition, the QPCR method is more advantageous in terms of time saving for the diagnosis and initiation of the treatment and in cases where QPCR is not available, IHS and conventional PCR methods should be used together. In our opinion, this study will contribute to the results of epidemiological and scientific studies on D.fragilis in Turkey.

Does Dientamoeba fragilis cause diarrhea? A systematic review.

It remains controversial whether Dientamoeba fragilis is a commensal parasite or a pathogen. The objective of this systematic review was to establish the strength of the evidence that Dientamoeba fragilis would cause diarrhea. A search was performed for studies that reported either the association between D. fragilis detection in stools and diarrhea or diarrhea outcomes with D. fragilis therapy or challenge. Data from seven studies of specific populations reported that 22% had D. fragilis in stools of which only 23% had diarrhea. Eleven studies of stool samples submitted to laboratories reported that 4.3% of individuals had D. fragilis of which 54% had diarrhea. Twelve studies reported that D. fragilis was detected from 1.6% of individuals with diarrhea and 9.6% of diarrheal stools. Five studies analyzed the prevalence of D. fragilis in individuals with and without diarrhea; the two with a statistically significant difference between groups had discordant results. The only cohort study with an appropriate control group reported diarrhea in a higher proportion of children with D. fragilis than in controls. No D. fragilis treatment studies included diarrhea as an outcome. There were only two challenge studies involving one person each. In conclusion, the evidence that D. fragilis would cause diarrhea or that treatment would hasten diarrhea resolution is inconclusive.

Dientamoeba fragilis, the Neglected Trichomonad of the Human Bowel.

Dientamoeba fragilis is a protozoan parasite of the human bowel, commonly reported throughout the world in association with gastrointestinal symptoms. Despite its initial discovery over 100 years ago, arguably, we know less about this peculiar organism than any other pathogenic or potentially pathogenic protozoan that infects humans. The details of its life cycle and mode of transmission are not completely known, and its potential as a human pathogen is debated within the scientific community. Recently, several major advances have been made with respect to this organism's life cycle and molecular biology. While many questions remain unanswered, these and other recent advances have given rise to some intriguing new leads, which will pave the way for future research. This review encompasses a large body of knowledge generated on various aspects of D. fragilis over the last century, together with an update on the most recent developments. This includes an update on the latest diagnostic techniques and treatments, the clinical aspects of dientamoebiasis, the development of an animal model, the description of a D. fragilis cyst stage, and the sequencing of the first D. fragilis transcriptome.