Lengthening in congenital posteromedial bowing of tibia: a follow-up series at skeletal maturity.

PURPOSE: Congenital posteromedial bowing (CPMB) of tibia is a rare, usually self-resolving condition that is present at birth. The data on the long-term outcome of lengthening, choice of fixator, outcome in early and late age groups, and complications is sparse, hence the need for this study. METHODS: This retrospective study included 93 patients with 94 affected legs from 1991 to 2023. The patients were categorized into early (under 10 years) and late (10 years or above) intervention groups. Eighteen patients with nineteen lengthening episodes who attained skeletal maturity made the basis of this study and will be discussed in detail. RESULTS: The outcome for the lengthening group at maturity was satisfactory, with 5.53 cm of average length gained per lengthening episode, a mean LLD of 0.31 cm at final follow-up, a mean age of 23.63 years (range 14-38 years), and an average follow-up of 12.51 years (range 3-28 years) post-lengthening, but the procedure was associated with difficulties like ankle stiffness, tibial valgus, pin tract infections, and fractures through regenerate. CONCLUSION: This study represents a large single-centre series on CPMB. We recommend that surgery for lengthening should be done at an older age, close to skeletal maturity, wherever possible to reduce the risk of repeat lengthening procedures. Based on our experience, we recommend the use of a circular fixator. Uniplanar distractors should have an adequate number and spread of Schanz screws in each segment to reduce the risk of valgus malalignment of distracting segments of bone.

Limb Length Discrepancy After Intraosseous Line Malpositioning: A Case Report.

CASE: We will present the case of a 6-year-old girl who presented with a 3-cm limb length discrepancy after intraosseous line placement at age 14 months without other known history of trauma or infection to account for the growth arrest. Imaging revealed a left proximal tibial physeal bar amenable to surgical resection with autologous lipotransfer. At 10 months postoperatively, physical examination and imaging demonstrated a stable 3-cm leg length discrepancy with an interval increase in the length of the left tibia in proportion to the growth of the right side with an increase in valgus alignment that will continue to be monitored and addressed as indicated. CONCLUSION: Pediatric intraosseous line placement presents unique challenges and can ultimately lead to physeal injury and growth arrest in the case of malpositioning.

Limb salvage reconstruction of the lower limb with complex ankle arthrodesis and magnetic internal lengthening nail.

PURPOSE: With advances in orthopedic implants, the use of intramedullary lengthening devices has gained increasing popularity as an alternative technique compared to lengthening with external fixators, with alleged comparable or better outcomes. The aim of this study is to report our single-center technique and outcomes of combined ankle arthrodesis and proximal tibial lengthening using external fixator with a motorized intramedullary nail, respectively. METHOD: Fourteen patients with post-traumatic advanced ankle arthritis underwent staged ankle arthrodesis with external fixator and proximal tibial lengthening using the PRECICE® ILN. Amount of shortening, length achieved, bone healing index, infection rate, ankle fusion rate, and ASAMI score were evaluated. RESULTS: The average age was 44 years old (range, 30-62). The mean follow up is 70 months (range, 43-121.4). The average amount of limb shortening for patients after ankle fusion was 36.7 mm (18-50) while lengthening was 35.9 mm (range, 18-50). Patients had the nail implanted for an average of 479 days (range, 248-730). Ankle fusions were healed in an average of 178.3 days. There were no surgical infections. All osteotomy-lengthening sites healed after an average 202 days (106-365). The mean bone healing index (BHI) was 56.0 days/cm (21.2-123.6) among the whole cohort. There were no cases of nonunion. ASAMI bone scores were excellent or good among all patients. CONCLUSION: Ankle arthrodesis with external fixation along with proximal tibial lengthening using motorized IMN yielded high rates of fusion and successful lengthening. This technique could be offered as a reasonable alternative to using external fixation for both purposes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Retrospective cohort study.

Clinical compatibility of magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic intramedullary nails: a feasibility study.

INTRODUCTION: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a magnetic intramedullary lengthening nail in place is contraindicated per the manufacturer due to the concern of implant activation and migration. A prior in vitro study did not confirm these complications only noting that a 3.0 T MRI weakened the internal magnet. Therefore, a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent an MRI with a magnetic nail in place was performed to determine if any adverse effects occurred in the clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent an MRI with a magnetic lengthening nail in place was performed. The time spent being imaged in the MRI, number of times the patient entered the MRI suite, and the images obtained were recorded. Radiographs were performed before and after the MRI to determine if any hardware complications occurred. The patients were monitored for any adverse symptoms while they were in the suite. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients with 13 nails were identified. Two patients underwent imaging with a 3.0 T MRI while the remaining 10 underwent imaging with a 1.5 T MRI. Each patient entered the MRI suite 2.1 times and spent an average of 84.7 min being imaged in the MRI (range 21-494). No patients noted any adverse symptoms related to the nail while in the suite and no hardware complications were identified. CONCLUSION: MRI appears to be safe with a magnetic nail in place and did not result in any complications. Given the manufacturer's recommendations, informed consent should be obtained prior to an MRI being performed and a 3.0 T MRI should be avoided when possible if further activation of the nail is required.

An innovative staged prosthetic lengthening reconstruction strategy for osteosarcoma-related leg discrepancy.

Correction of leg length discrepancy (LLD) in skeletally mature patients with osteosarcoma was rarely reported and quite challenging. This study aimed to propose a treatment strategy of staged lengthening and reconstruction with a standard static prosthesis to address LLD and restore limb function. It also evaluated the effectiveness of the strategy in terms of leg lengthening, functional outcomes, and complications. The strategy for lengthening included three stages. In stage 1, the previous prosthesis was removed and an external fixator with a temporary rod-cement spacer was placed. In this stage, the external fixator was used to lengthen the limb to the appropriate length. In stage 2, the external fixator was removed and the old rod-cement spacer was replaced with a new one. In stage 3, the rod-cement spacer was removed and the standard static prosthesis was planted. Nine skeletally mature distal femoral osteosarcoma patients with unacceptable LLD were treated in our institution from 2019 to 2021. We performed a chart review on nine patients for the clinical and radiographic assessment of functional outcomes, LLD, and complications. The mean (range) leg lengthening was 7.3 cm (3.6-15.6). The mean (range) LLD of the lower limbs decreased from 7.6 cm (4.1-14.2) before the lengthening to 0.3 cm (- 0.3 to 2.1) at the final follow-up with statistical significance (P = 0.000). The mean (range) Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score improved from 30.3% (16.7%-53.3%) before the lengthening to 96.3% (86.7%-100%) at the final follow-up with statistical significance (P = 0.000). Three patients (33.3%) had a minor complication; none needed additional surgical intervention. In the short term, the current staged lengthening and reconstruction with standard static prosthesis provided satisfactory functional outcomes and LLD correction with few complications. The long-term effects of this method need further exploration.

Evaluation of simultaneous bilateral femoral distraction osteogenesis with antegrade intramedullary lengthening nails in achondroplasia with rhizomelic short stature: a retrospective study of 15 patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Bilateral femoral distraction osteogenesis in patients with achondroplasia is insufficiently reported. We aimed to perform the first study that exclusively analyzed simultaneous bilateral femoral distraction osteogenesis with motorized intramedullary lengthening nails via an antegrade approach in patients with achondroplasia focused on reliability, accuracy, precision, and the evolving complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective singlecenter study we analyzed patients with achondroplasia who underwent simultaneous bilateral femoral lengthening with antegrade intramedullary lengthening nails between October 2014 and April 2019. 15 patients (30 femoral segments) of median age 14 years (interquartile range [IQR] 12-15) were available for analysis. The median follow-up was 29 months (IQR 27-37) after nail implantation. RESULTS: The median distraction length per segment was 49 mm (IQR 47-51) with a median distraction index of 1.0 mm/day (IQR 0.9-1.0), and a median consolidation index of 20 days/cm (IQR 17-23). Reliability of the lengthening nails was 97% and their calculated accuracy and precision were 96% and 95%, respectively. The most common complication was temporary restriction of knee range of motion during distraction in 10 of 30 of the lengthened segments. 1 patient was treated with 2 unplanned additional surgeries due to premature consolidation. CONCLUSION: The method is reliable and accurate with few complications.

The Modified Fels and Abbreviated Modified Fels Knee Skeletal-Maturity Systems in the Prediction of Leg-Length Discrepancy.

BACKGROUND: The Modified Fels (mFels) and Abbreviated Modified Fels (abFels) knee systems have been recently developed as options for grading skeletal maturity without the need for a separate hand radiograph. We sought to determine the interobserver reliability of these systems and to compare their prediction accuracy with that of the Greulich and Pyle (G-P) atlas in a cohort managed with epiphysiodesis for leg-length discrepancy (LLD). METHODS: Three reviewers scored 20 knee radiographs using the mFels system, which includes 5 qualitative and 2 quantitative measures as well as a quantitative output. Short leg length (SL), long leg length (LL), and LLD prediction errors at maturity using the White-Menelaus (W-M) method and G-P, mFels, or abFels skeletal age were compared in a cohort of 60 patients managed with epiphysiodesis for LLD. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients for the 2 quantitative variables and the quantitative output of the mFels system using 20 knee radiographs ranged from 0.55 to 0.98, and kappa coefficients for the 5 qualitative variables ranged from 0.56 to 1, indicating a reliability range from moderate to excellent. In the epiphysiodesis cohort, G-P skeletal age was on average 0.25 year older than mFels and abFels skeletal ages, most notably in females. The majority of average prediction errors between G-P, mFels, and abFels were <0.5 cm, with the greatest error being for the SL prediction in females, which approached 1 cm. Skeletal-age estimates with the mFels and abFels systems were statistically comparable. CONCLUSIONS: The mFels skeletal-age system is a reproducible method of determining skeletal age. Prediction errors in mFels and abFels skeletal ages were clinically comparable with those in G-P skeletal ages in this epiphysiodesis cohort. Further work is warranted to optimize and validate the accuracy of mFels and abFels skeletal ages to predict LLD and the impact of epiphysiodesis, particularly in females. Both the mFels and abFels systems are promising means of estimating skeletal age, avoiding additional radiation and health-care expenditure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A large preoperative pelvic oblique angle affects perception of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: In some cases, patients feel a perceived leg length discrepancy (P-LLD) despite no radiographic leg length discrepancy (R-LLD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We aimed to investigate the rate of postoperative P-LLD and the factors that cause postoperative P-LLD. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 100 patients with R-LLD ≤5 mm after THA. Patients were classified into two groups based on P-LLD post-THA: group P (with P-LLD) and group E (without P-LLD). Relevant data on the general characteristics and radiological findings between the two groups were compared. RESULTS: We observed that 25 & 75% of patients belonged to group P and group E, respectively, with no significant difference in patient background. Postoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) classification of pain and activities of daily living scores were significantly lower in group P than in group E (37.2 ± 3.9 vs. 39.1 ± 2.2, respectively; P = 0.013, and 16.2 ± 4.2 vs. 18.2 ± 2.2, respectively; P = 0.011). The preoperative pelvic oblique angle (POA) was significantly larger in group P than in group E (3.3 ± 2.3° vs. -0.2 ± 2.1°; respectively; P < 0.01). The pelvis tilted toward the surgical side was significantly higher in group P than in group E(88% vs 57%; respectively; P = 0.013). The preoperative C7 coronal vertical axis (C7 CVA) was significantly larger in group P than in group E (6.7 ± 14.7 mm vs. -0.2 ± 10.3 mm; respectively; P = 0.028). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that preoperative POA (OR, 3.71; 95% CI: 1.86-8.12; P < 0.01) and the pelvis tilted toward the surgical side (OR, 4.14; 95% CI: 2.07-9.71; P = 0.022) were independent risk factors for P-LLD after THA. CONCLUSION: Even though there was no postoperative R-LLD, 25% of patients had P-LLD. A large preoperative POA and the pelvis tilted toward the surgical side were independent risk factors for P-LLD after THA.

Arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures is at risk for under restoration of lateral femoral offset.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine the restoration of hip biomechanics through lateral offset, leg length, and acetabular component position when comparing non-arthroplasty surgeons (NAS) to elective arthroplasty surgeons (EAS). METHODS: 131 patients, with a femoral neck fracture treated with a THA by 7 EAS and 20 NAS, were retrospectively reviewed. 2 blinded observers measured leg-length discrepancy, femoral offset, and acetabular component position. Multivariate logistic regression models examined the association between the surgeon groups and restoration of lateral femoral, acetabular offset, leg length discrepancy, acetabular anteversion, acetabular position, and component size, while adjusting for surgical approach and spinal pathology. RESULTS: NAS under-restored 4.8 mm of lateral femoral offset (43.9 ± 8.7 mm) after THA when compared to the uninjured side (48.7 ± 7.1 mm, p = 0.044). NAS were at risk for under-restoring lateral femoral offset when compared to EAS (p = 0.040). There was no association between lateral acetabular offset, leg length, acetabular position, or component size and surgeon type. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral femoral offset is at risk for under-restoration after THA for femoral neck fractures, when performed by surgeons that do not regularly perform elective THA. This indicates that lateral femoral offset is an under-appreciated contributor to hip instability when performing THA for a femoral neck fracture. Lateral femoral offset deserves as much attention and awareness as acetabular component position since a secondary analysis of our data reveal that preoperative templating and intraoperative imaging did not prevent under-restoration.

The impact of operative approach and intraoperative imaging on leg length discrepancy and acetabular component angle in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Operative approach in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has long been a topic of debate with each approach having unique benefits and disadvantages. One purported benefit of an anterior approach to THA is that it allows for intraoperative positioning using fluoroscopy rather than manual positioning. Proper positioning allows for improved outcomes including leg length discrepancy and acetabular component angle. This study aims to examine if operative approach and use of imaging in intraoperative positioning impact LLD and cup angle post-operatively. METHODS: A total of 300 hips were enrolled in the study with 100 hips per approach (anterior with fluoroscopy, lateral, and posterior). Retrospective chart review was conducted to assess patient demographics and radiographic analysis used to determine LLD and acetabular cup angle. RESULTS: Of the three groups, those receiving anterior approach THAs were on average older than those in the posterior group. Analysis comparing the LLD and acetabular angle across the three groups showed no statistically significant difference in LLD (p=0.091); this was also reflected when comparing hips that received fluoroscopy with those that did not (p=0.91). For acetabular angle, while no difference existed when comparing hips that received imaging versus those that did not, statistically significant differences were observed when comparing the three intraoperative approaches (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Neither intraoperative approach nor the use of intraoperative imaging in THA has a statistically significant effect on LLD post-operatively. However, approach did impact the acetabular cup angle across all three distinct approaches.

Ipsilateral Healthy-segment Response to Leg Length Discrepancy.

BACKGROUND: Few studies address frequency or magnitude of healthy lower-extremity segment response to ipsilateral companion segment shortening. We sought to document and quantify this occurrence in a variety of pediatric etiologies. METHODS: We reviewed the medical record and radiographs of patients undergoing epiphysiodesis to manage leg length discrepancy. Inclusion criteria for this study were leg length discrepancy of a single lower-extremity segment by identifiable cause and adequate scanograms to allow accurate measurement of all 4 lower-extremity segments before any surgical treatment for the discrepancy. We recorded the etiology of shortening, age of onset of disorder, the length of the lower-extremity segments on scanograms, and age at the time of radiographs. We considered ipsilateral healthy-segment difference from the contralateral ≥ 0.5 cm. as clinically significant. RESULTS: Two hundred nine patients met inclusion criteria (126 boys, 83 girls). The average age was 12.5 years. 16/60 patients with avascular necrosis of the hip demonstrated ipsilateral tibial shortening averaging 1.2 cm whereas 6/60 demonstrated ipsilateral tibial overgrowth averaging 0.6 cm. 11/30 Legg-Perthés patients demonstrated ipsilateral tibial shortening averaging 0.7 cm; none had ipsilateral tibial overgrowth. 10/42 posteromedial bow patients had ipsilateral femoral shortening averaging 0.8 cm, whereas 6/42 had ipsilateral overgrowth averaging 0.8 cm. 13/48 with distal femoral physeal injury demonstrated ipsilateral tibial shortening averaging 1.2 cm, whereas 6/48 demonstrated ipsilateral tibial overgrowth averaging 0.8 cm. 8/29 tibial physeal injuries (proximal or distal) demonstrated ipsilateral femoral shortening averaging 1.1 cm. whereas 7/29 demonstrated ipsilateral femoral overgrowth averaging 0.7 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are individual exceptions, the ipsilateral healthy segment does not grow appreciably more than the contralateral in patients with avascular necrosis of the hip, Legg-Perthés disease, or physeal trauma. The femur is not a significant component of shortening in patients with posteromedial bow. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective review.

Reconstruction of Bony Defects With Motorized Intramedullary Nails After Tumor Resection.

Motorized intramedullary lengthening nails allow for transport of a bone segment for limb lengthening, deformity correction, healing of nonunion, and intercalary distraction osteogenesis. Resection of tumors involving the bone can result in substantial defects that require reconstruction. Use of these nails allows for a biologic reconstruction with the incorporation of allograft or by distraction osteogenesis. Limb lengthening after an internal hemipelvectomy where the hip joint is resected can be performed to improve gait, decrease pain, and prevent the need for a custom shoe or shoe lift. Using these nails in compression aids the incorporation of intercalary allografts and prevents stress shielding and stress risers within the graft when compared with plating. It also allows for a subsequent lengthening of the limb using the same implant. Plate-assisted bone segment transport or the use of a bone transport nail allows for a true biologic reconstruction of an intercalary defect using distraction osteogenesis. These implants provide the orthopaedic oncologist with more options for reconstruction and the potential to improve the function and outcomes of their patients.

PRECICE nail for the management of posttraumatic bone defects with nonunion or malunion: Experience from a Latin American center.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical outcomes using the PRECICE magnetic limb lengthening intramedullary nail for the correction of lower limb length discrepancies (LLD) in adults with posttraumatic nonunion or malunion defects in a Latin American center. METHODS: A retrospective review of 25 adult patients with LLD associated with posttraumatic nonunion or malunion defects of femur or tibia treated with the PRECICE nail between January 2018 and December 2020. The primary outcomes considered were lengthening length achieved in mm, incidence of complications and quality of life (EQ-5D-3 L questionnaire). RESULTS: Twenty-five cases (20 femoral and 5 tibial nails) were performed, with a median follow-up of 27 months (Interquartile range-IQR: 17.5 to 34.5). The average age was 36.5 ± 12.9 years; 10 cases were women. Fifteen cases had an LLD secondary to a malunion defect and 10 cases had an LLD secondary to a nonunion. PRECICE nails were inserted for the treatment of a median LLD of 40.0 mm (IQR: 30.2 to 74.2) in the femur and 30.0 mm (28.5 to 50.0) in the tibia. An accuracy of 100% was reported in 18 cases (Femur: 14 and tibia: 4) and consolidation was achieved in 22/25 cases with the PRECICE nail in situ. Complications were recorded in 9 (36%) cases (6/20 femur, 3/5 tibia), mainly related to the consolidation process (5/9). The median EQ-5D and EQ-VAS were 0.79 (IQR: 0.63 to 0.79) and 80.0 (IQR: 50.0 to 90.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that the PRECICE nail is an effective device for the management of posttraumatic LLD during the treatment of nonunion or malunion bone defects of femur and tibia, offering a reasonable quality of life, despite its postoperative complication risk.

Fluoroscopy-guided direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty provides more accurate component positions in the supine position than in the lateral position.

PURPOSE: The position of the acetabular and femoral components is critical for stability and wear resistance. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the fluoroscopy-guided direct anterior approach in the supine position (S-DAA) is more helpful in improving the position of acetabular and femoral components than the fluoroscopy-guided direct anterior approach in the lateral decubitus position (L-DAA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 76 cases of fluoroscopy-guided direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (38 cases in the S-DAA and 38 cases in the L-DAA group) was performed in one hospital from 2019 to 2021. The differences in inclination, anteversion, femoral offset (FO), global offset (GO), and leg length discrepancy (LLD) measurements during and after surgery were analyzed. The postoperative femoral offset (FO), global offset (GO), leg length discrepancy (LLD), and preoperative and postoperative Harris hip score were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In the S-DAA group, there were no significant differences in the mean intraoperative inclination angle anteversion angle, FO, GO, and LLD compared to the postoperative values, whereas in the L-DAA group, there were significant differences between the intraoperative and postoperative measurements (P < 0.001, P = 0.009, P＜0.001, P＜0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively). Additionally, there were significant differences in the accuracy of LLD, FO, and GO between the two groups (P < 0.001). Compared with the L-DAA group, the average differences of inclination, anteversion, LLD, FO, and GO during and after operation in the S-DAA group were smaller, and the consistency was higher. There was a significant difference in Harris hip score between the two groups at 1 week after surgery (P = 0.033). There was no significant difference in Harris hip score between 1 month and 3 months after surgery (P = 0.482 and P = 0.797, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In the supine group, the direct anterior approach (DAA) provides more accurate positioning of the acetabular and femoral components. However, there was no significant difference in hip joint function and activity between the two groups at follow-up.

Tibial lengthening for massive distal femoral bone loss.

A man in his 30s was involved in a road traffic accident (RTA) and sustained a grade-IIIA distal femur fracture with acute loss of distal two-third of the femur. Initially, damage control surgery was done by an external fixator application. Later, staged limb reconstruction surgery was undertaken as a definitive procedure that involved bifocal distraction osteogenesis involving the proximal tibia and femur along with docking of the corticotomised femoral fragment onto the tibial plateau to achieve knee arthrodesis. The tibial and femoral regenerate together measured 25.8 cm at the end of distraction phase leaving behind a limb length discrepancy of 5 cm. Acute traumatic large bone loss is a rare presentation and is beset with unique management challenges. Limb reconstruction surgery (LRS) with LRS system provides flexibility to tackle individual case-based scenarios and helps achieve limb length, maintain alignment and restore function.

Distraction osteogenesis at the site of neutral wedge ostectomy for angular limb deformity in the hind limb in 2 young dogs.

Our objective was to report the use of distraction osteogenesis at the site of angular limb deformity correction using external skeletal fixation for treatment of 1 femoral and 1 tibial angular limb deformity in 2 large-breed puppies. Medical records were reviewed from 2 dogs (a 7-month-old intact male golden retriever and a 4-month-old intact female German shepherd mixed breed) diagnosed with angular limb deformities and truncation of a pelvic limb. Surgical treatment consisted of neutral wedge ostectomy and distraction osteogenesis at the site of bone deformity with an external skeletal fixator (ESF). The surgical technique and postoperative period of distraction osteogenesis were reviewed along with postoperative complications and clinical outcomes after complete bone healing was evident radiographically. Both dogs had adequate bone formation during distraction osteogenesis and the ESFs remained intact and structurally stable. At ESF removal, femoral length had increased 2.6 cm for Dog 1 and tibial length increased 3.88 cm for Dog 2, distal femoral valgus improved 16.3 degrees for Dog 1, and tibial procurvatum improved 19.5 degrees and distal tibial valgus improved 6.2 degrees for Dog 2. At the last follow-up examinations, 5 mo (Dog 1) and 3 mo (Dog 2) postoperatively, both dogs were ambulating without any visible lameness. Key clinical message: Acute angular correction and subsequent distraction osteogenesis at the site of bone deformity and corrective ostectomy using an ESF enabled successful treatment of femoral (Dog 1) and tibial (Dog 2) truncation and angulation in 2 large-breed puppies. Optimal deformity correction and lengthening were achieved through distraction osteogenesis at the site of neutral wedge ostectomy, minimizing soft tissue dissection and risk for potential complications that can occur with bifocal deformity correction (i.e., correction of the deformity at 1 osteotomy/ostectomy and correction of bone length at another, remote osteotomy).

Ostéogenèse par distraction au site d'ostectomie en coin neutre pour déformation angulaire du membre postérieur chez 2 jeunes chiens. Notre objectif était de rapporter l'utilisation de l'ostéogenèse par distraction au niveau du site de correction de la déformation angulaire du membre par fixation squelettique externe pour le traitement d'une déformation angulaire fémorale et d'une déformation angulaire tibiale chez 2 chiots de grande race. Les dossiers médicaux ont été examinés concernant 2 chiens (un golden retriever mâle intact âgé de 7 mois et une femelle berger allemand intacte de race mixte âgée de 4 mois) diagnostiqués avec des déformations angulaires des membres et une troncature d'un membre pelvien. Le traitement chirurgical consistait en une ostéogenèse en coin neutre et une ostéogenèse par distraction au niveau du site de déformation osseuse avec un fixateur squelettique externe (FSE). La technique chirurgicale et la période postopératoire d'ostéogenèse par distraction ont été examinées ainsi que les complications postopératoires et les résultats cliniques après une guérison osseuse complète évidente radiographiquement.Les deux chiens présentaient une formation osseuse adéquate pendant l'ostéogenèse par distraction et les FSE restaient intacts et structurellement stables. Lors du retrait de le FSE, la longueur fémorale avait augmenté de 2,6 cm pour le chien 1 et la longueur tibiale de 3,88 cm pour le chien 2, le valgus fémoral distal s'était amélioré de 16,3 degrés pour le chien 1, le procurvatum tibial s'était amélioré de 19,5 degrés et le valgus tibial distal s'était amélioré de 6,2 degrés pour le chien 2. Lors des derniers examens de suivi, 5 mois (chien 1) et 3 mois (chien 2) postopératoires, les deux chiens marchaient sans aucune boiterie visible.Message clinique clé :La correction angulaire aiguë et l'ostéogenèse de distraction ultérieure au site de déformation osseuse et l'ostectomie corrective à l'aide d'un FSE ont permis un traitement réussi de la troncature et de l'angulation fémorale (chien 1) et tibiale (chien 2) chez 2 chiots de grande race. La correction et l'allongement optimaux de la déformation ont été obtenus grâce à l'ostéogenèse par distraction au site de l'ostectomie en coin neutre, minimisant la dissection des tissus mous et le risque de complications potentielles pouvant survenir avec la correction de la déformation bifocale (c'est-à-dire la correction de la déformation à 1 ostéotomie/ostectomie et la correction de la longueur de l'os à une autre ostéotomie distante).(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).

Simultaneous femoral and tibial lengthening for severe limb length discrepancy in fibular hemimelia.

BACKGROUND: Fibular Hemimelia (FH) is the most common longitudinal limb deficiency. Significant limb length discrepancy (LLD) will necessitate long treatment times and multiple settings to compensate for LLD when associated with femoral shortening. This study evaluates the outcome of simultaneous femoral and tibial lengthening using the Ilizarov frame. METHODS: This retrospective study included the cases of 12 children with severe limb length discrepancy caused by combined FH and ipsilateral femoral shortening from May 2015 to August 2022. The total LLD ranged from 7 to 14.5 cm. All patients underwent single-session femoral and tibial lengthening using the Ilizarov ring external fixator technique. Additional procedures were performed in the same setting, including Achilles tendon lengthening, fibular anlage excision, peroneal tendons lengthening, and iliotibial band release. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 4 years. RESULTS: The planned limb lengthening was achieved in ten cases (83%). No cases of joint subluxation or dislocation were encountered. No neurovascular injury has occurred during the treatment course. In all cases, the bone healing index was better on the femoral side than on the tibia. Poor regeneration and deformity of the tibia occurred in two cases (16.6%). CONCLUSION: Simultaneous femoral and tibial lengthening using the Ilizarov fixator is a relatively safe procedure with the result of correction of total LLD in one session in a shorter time and less morbidity.

Results of Ilizarov external fixator lengthening compared to lengthening and then plating in management of femoral shortening in children.

Femoral shortening in children is a challenging condition with complex functional and psychological implications. We study the results of Ilizarov external fixator (IEF) lengthening compared to lengthening and then plating (LAP) in the management of femoral shortening in children. Forty patients were included in the study and equally divided randomly into 2 groups, in group I LAP was used and in group II lengthening by IEF only was done. The two groups were analyzed for postoperative variables to adjudge the surgical outcomes. The mean follow up time was 24.05 ± 2.99 months, The gained length was 5.60 ± 0.60 cm in group 1 and 5.48 ± 0.64 cm in group II, group I had a shorter external fixator period (3.96 ± 0.22) months, better healing index (24.6 ±2.76) days/cm, earlier complete weight-bearing (5.55 ± 0.78) months than group II. The period of hospitalization for group I was longer more than group II. The complications were less in group I (n=7, 35%) than in group II (n=11, 55%). There was no significant correlation between the healing index with age, also no significant difference was detected between the healing index and gender. There was a significant correlation between the gained length and complete weight-bearing. This study efficiently demonstrates that LAP may be better than lengthening with IEF alone in the management of femoral shortening in children.

Stricter correction of leg length discrepancy is required during total hip arthroplasty in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ankylosing spondylitis often have fusions in the spine and sacroiliac joints, such that it is difficult to compensate for leg length discrepancy (LLD). METHODS: We retrospectively measured the LLD after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in 89 patients with ankylosing spondylitis from June 2004 to February 2021 at our institute. Patients were divided into two groups based on an LLD of 5 mm. Clinical outcomes were investigated using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Harris Hip Score (HHS). In addition, these points are investigated: patient satisfaction with the operation; whether there was a current difference in leg length; and whether there was a limping gait. RESULTS: The group with an LLD of 5-10 mm rather than < 5 mm had significantly worse WOMAC pain and stiffness. The survey revealed statistically significant differences in patient satisfaction with the operation, limping gait, and whether back pain had improved. CONCLUSION: For patients with ankylosing spondylitis, reducing the LLD to < 5 mm, which is more accurate than the current standard of < 10 mm, may produce greater improvement in clinical outcomes after hip arthroplasty.

Changes in leg length and hip offset in navigated imageless vs. conventional total hip arthroplasty.

While previous studies on navigated total hip replacement (nTHA) focused on acetabular component positioning, we compared the results of nTHA with conventional total hip replacement (cTHA) in respect of changes in leg length and hip offset. In a single-center study results radiographic parameters of patients with unilateral THA were included. Data were retrospectively analyzed from computer navigation data and radiographs. Analysis concentrated on the discrepancy in leg length (LLD) and hip offset (OSD) between the affected and unaffected hip. The effect of the procedure was defined as the difference between postoperative and preoperative LLD and OSD values in each group. 2332 patients were analyzed. Both nTHA and cTHA were effective in restoring LLD and OSD by reducing the preoperative value significantly (p < 0.001). Regarding changes in LLD, no statistical difference between nTHA and cTHA could be found. Changes in OSD nTHA was a slightly more effective than cTHA (- 2.06 ± 6.00 mm vs. - 1.50 ± 5.35 mm; p < 0.05). Both navigated and conventional THA were successful in reconstruction of leg length and hip offset, while postoperative offset discrepancy was significantly lower in the navigated group at the cost of longer operation times. If these results are clinically relevant further investigation is needed.