A rating scale for the functional assessment of patients with familial dysautonomia (Riley Day syndrome).

OBJECTIVE: To develop a reliable rating scale to assess functional capacity in children with familial dysautonomia, evaluate changes over time, and determine whether severity within a particular functional category at a young age affected survival. STUDY DESIGN: Ten functional categories were retrospectively assessed in 123 patients with familial dysautonomia at age 7 years ± 6 months. Each of the 10 Functional Severity Scale categories (motor development, cognitive ability, psychological status, expressive speech, balance, oral coordination, frequency of dysautonomic crisis, respiratory, cardiovascular, and nutritional status) were scored from 1 (worst or severely affected) to 5 (best or no impairment). Changes over time were analyzed further in 22 of the 123 patients who were also available at ages 17 and 27 years. RESULTS: Severely impaired cardiovascular function and high frequency of dysautonomic crisis negatively affected survival (P < .005 and P < .001, respectively). In the 22 individuals followed up to age 27 years, psychological status significantly worsened (P = .01), and expressive speech improved (P = .045). From age 17 to 27 years, balance worsened markedly (P = .048). CONCLUSION: The Functional Severity Scale is a reliable tool to measure functional capacity in patients with familial dysautonomia. The scale may prove useful in providing prognosis and as a complementary endpoint in clinical trials.

Neoplasia in familial dysautonomia: a 20-year review in a young patient population.

We reviewed the charts of all patients with familial dysautonomia (n = 631) and found that 2% had been diagnosed with tumors. We hypothesize that the IkappaB Kinase-associated protein gene mutation, which causes aberrant RNA splicing in patients with familial dysautonomia, may contribute to tumorigenesis in this genetically homogenous patient population.

Survival in familial dysautonomia: Impact of early intervention.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of advances in supportive centralized care on survival and function in patients with familial dysautonomia (FD). STUDY DESIGN: From September l, 1969 through January 1, 2001. Five hundred fifty-one patients with FD entered the Dysautonomia Center. We divided the group into two cohorts: the first cohort (n = 227) entered until March 1, 1981, and the second cohort (n = 324) entered after March 1, 1981. Survival curves were compared by using log-rank tests. Demographic and disease characteristics were examined, including gender, geographic location, age at entry, birth weight, breath-holding history, age of walking, causes of death, and social data. RESULTS: For both cohorts age at entry was the primary variable that influenced survival; mortality increased by 3% per year. Survival time lengthened for cohort 2 when survival time was defined as time from entry into the Center to last observation or death; in cohort 2, mortality was 73% that of cohort 1 even after adjustment for age at entry. Although survival improved, causes of death were unchanged; sleep deaths and sudden deaths remained frequent. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the more recent cohort patients were younger at the time of entry and had improved survival, which suggests that early access to centralized and more advanced treatment appreciably benefits patients with familial dysautonomia.