Does assistive technology contribute to safety among home-dwelling older adults?

BACKGROUND: Assistive technology carries the promise of alleviating public expenditure on long-term care, while at the same time enabling older adults to live more safely at home for as long as possible. Home-dwelling older people receiving reablement and dementia care at their homes are two important target groups for assistive technology. However, the need for help, the type of help and the progression of their needs differ. These two groups are seldom compared even though they are two large groups of service users in Norway and their care needs constitute considerable costs to Norwegian municipalities. The study explores how assistive technology impacts the feeling of safety among these two groups and their family caregivers. METHODS: Face-to-face, semi-structured interviews lasting between 17 and 61 min were conducted between November 2018 and August 2019 with home-dwelling older adults receiving reablement (N = 15) and dementia care (N = 10) and the family caregivers (N = 9) of these users in seven municipalities in Norway. All interviews were audio-recorded, fully transcribed, thematically coded and inductively analyzed following Clarke and Braun's principles for thematic analysis. RESULTS: Service users in both groups felt safe when knowing how to use assistive technology. However, the knowledge of how to use assistive technology was not enough to create a feeling of safety. In fact, for some users, this knowledge was a source of anxiety or frustration, especially when the user had experienced the limitations of the technology. For the service users with dementia, assistive technology was experienced as disturbing when they were unable to understand how to handle it, but at the same time, it also enabled some of them to continue living at home. For reablement users, overreliance on technology could undermine the progress of their functional improvement and thus their independence. CONCLUSION: For users in both service groups, assistive technology may promote a sense of safety but has also disadvantages. However, technology alone does not seem to create a sense of safety. Rather, it is the appropriate use of assistive technology within the context of interactions between service users, their family caregivers and the healthcare staff that contributes to the feeling of safety.

Low adoption of mobility device in later life: Insights from the lens of intersectionality.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the utilization of mobility device, whether age and gender-related use disparities exist, and whether falls can further explain use disparities over time among Chinese older adults in need of devices. METHODS: Community-dwelling older adults who needed mobility devices and completed four waves of the China Health and Retirement Survey 2011-2018 were included (N = 1,302). A categorical variable was created to represent respondents' intersectionality of age (50-64, 65-74, and ≥75 years) and gender (men vs. women). RESULTS: The baseline prevalence of device use was 18.2 % (n = 237). Overall, the device use increased over time. Intersectionality-wise, oldest-old women were 1.53 times more likely than youngest-old men to use devices over time. Respondents with falls were more likely to use devices over time. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with mobility impairment, especially the oldest-old women and those with falls, lag in mobility devices utilization, suggesting future tailored interventions to support these populations.

Assistive Technology's Potential to Improve Employment of People with Disabilities.

PURPOSE: This study investigates how access to assistive technologies affects employment and earnings among people with disabilities. METHODS: We first document employment and earnings gaps associated with specific impairments and activity limitations using 2017-2021 American Community Survey and 2014 Survey of Income and Program Participation data. We then use accommodations data from the 2012, 2019, and 2021 Current Population Survey (CPS) Disability Supplements to examine employment and earnings growth for people with disabilities related both to any, and to technology-based, accommodations. We also provide short descriptions of three developing assistive technologies that assist people with upper body impairments, visual impairments, and anxiety conditions. RESULTS: Almost all impairments and activity limitations are linked to lower employment and earnings, with especially low employment among people with mobility impairments and particularly low earnings among those with cognitive impairments. About one-tenth of workers with disabilities received any accommodations, and 3-4% received equipment-based accommodations in the 2012-2021 period; these figures increased slightly over the period. The occupations with the highest disability accommodations rates had greater disability employment growth from 2012 to 2021, but disability pay gaps did not decrease more in these occupations. The three developing assistive technologies we describe illustrate the potential to reduce the estimated employment and earnings deficits. CONCLUSION: Assistive technology accommodations have potential for improving employment outcomes for people with disabilities.

Aging 4.0? Rethinking the ethical framing of technology-assisted eldercare.

Technological approaches are increasingly discussed as a solution for the provision of support in activities of daily living as well as in medical and nursing care for older people. The development and implementation of such assistive technologies for eldercare raise manifold ethical, legal, and social questions. The discussion of these questions is influenced by theoretical perspectives and approaches from medical and nursing ethics, especially the principlist framework of autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice. Tying in with previous criticism, the present contribution is taking these principles as a starting point and as a frame of reference to be critically re-examined. It thus aims to outline how existing ethical frameworks need to be extended or reconsidered to capture the ethical issues posed by technological developments regarding care for older people. In a first step, we provide a brief overview of assistive technologies in eldercare according to their purposes and functions. In the next step, we discuss how the questions and problems raised by new technologies in eldercare call for an expansion, re-interpretation, and revision of the principlist framework. We underline that the inclusion of ethical perspectives from engineering and computer science as well as a closer consideration of socio-political dimensions and fundamental anthropological and praxeological questions are needed.

Usability, occupational performance and satisfaction evaluation of a smart environment controlled by infrared oculography by people with severe motor disabilities.

A smart environment is an assistive technology space that can enable people with motor disabilities to control their equipment (TV, radio, fan, etc.) through a human-machine interface activated by different inputs. However, assistive technology resources are not always considered useful, reaching quite high abandonment rate. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a smart environment controlled through infrared oculography by people with severe motor disabilities. The study sample was composed of six individuals with motor disabilities. Initially, sociodemographic data forms, the Functional Independence Measure (FIMTM), and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) were applied. The participants used the system in their domestic environment for a week. Afterwards, they were reevaluated with regards to occupational performance (COPM), satisfaction with the use of the assistive technology resource (QUEST 2.0), psychosocial impact (PIADS) and usability of the system (SUS), as well as through semi-structured interviews for suggestions or complaints. The most common demand from the participants of this research was 'control of the TV'. Two participants did not use the system. All participants who used the system (four) presented positive results in all assessment protocols, evidencing greater independence in the control of the smart environment equipment. In addition, they evaluated the system as useful and with good usability. Non-acceptance of disability and lack of social support may have influenced the results.

External Devices Among Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury From a Developing Country.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the proportion, number, and type of external devices (including mobility devices, ambulatory aides, and orthotics) possessed and used by individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) from a developing country. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 163 participants with SCI from several rural communities in a developing country participated in the study from June 2018 to August 2019. METHODS: The participants were interviewed and assessed for their SCI characteristics and the external devices (i.e., mobility devices, ambulatory aides, and orthotics) they possessed and used in their daily living. RESULTS: Most participants (85%), who lived in rural communities with a family income of less than $3167 per year, possessed external devices (one to five types), and 80% of all participants actually used the devices (one to three types) in their daily living. Most participants with motor-complete SCI used a single device, especially a manual wheelchair, whereas those with mild lesion severity used multiple devices for their daily activities, particularly a standard walker. CONCLUSION: Owing to budget and environmental constraints, the external devices used by individuals with SCI from a developing country are different from those reported in a developed country. The findings provide particular insights into the management of external devices for these individuals of a developing country.

Estimating assistive product need in Cameroon and India: results of population-based surveys and comparison of self-report and clinical impairment assessment approaches.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate population need and coverage for distance glasses, hearing aids and wheelchairs in India and Cameroon, and to explore the relationship between assistive product (AP) need measured through self-report and clinical impairment assessment. METHODS: Population-based surveys of approximately 4000 people each were conducted in Mahabubnagar district, India and Fundong district, Cameroon. Participants underwent standardised vision, hearing and musculoskeletal impairment assessment to assess need for distance glasses, hearing aids, wheelchairs. Participants with moderate or worse impairment and/or self-reported difficulties in functioning were also asked about their self-reported AP need. RESULTS: 6.5% (95% CI 5.4-7.9) in India and 1.9% (95% CI 1.5-2.4) in Cameroon of the population needed at least one of the three APs based on moderate or worse impairments. Total need was highest for distance glasses [3.7% (95% CI 2.8-4.7) India; 0.8% (95% CI 0.5-1.1), Cameroon] and lowest for wheelchairs (0.1% both settings; 95% CI 0.03-0.3 India, 95% CI 0.04-0.3 Cameroon). Coverage for each AP was below 40%, except for distance glasses in India, where it was 87% (95% CI 77.1-93.0). The agreement between self-report and clinical impairment assessment of AP need was poor. For instance, in India, 60% of people identified through clinical assessment as needing distance glasses did not self-report a need. Conversely, in India, 75% of people who self-reported needing distance glasses did not require one based on clinical impairment assessment. CONCLUSIONS: There is high need and low coverage of three APs in two low-and middle-income settings. Methodological shortcomings highlight the need for improved survey methods compatible with the international classification of functioning, disability and health to estimate population-level need for AP and related services to inform advocacy and planning.

OBJECTIFS: Estimer les besoins et la couverture de la population en lunettes de distance, appareils auditifs et chaises roulantes en Inde et au Cameroun; et explorer la relation entre les besoins en produits d'assistance (PA) mesurés par l'auto-déclaration et l'évaluation clinique de la déficience. MÉTHODES: Enquêtes de population sur environ 4.000 personnes, chacune menées dans le district de Mahabubnagar, en Inde et dans le district de Fundong, au Cameroun. Les participants ont subi une évaluation standardisée de la vision, de l'audition et des troubles musculosquelettiques pour évaluer les besoins en lunettes de distance, en appareils auditifs et en chaises roulantes. Les participants ayant une déficience modérée ou sévère et/ou des difficultés fonctionnelles autodéclarées ont également été interrogés sur leurs besoins autodéclarés en PA. RÉSULTATS: 6,5% (IC95%: 5,4-7,9) de la population en Inde et 1,9% (IC95%: 1,5-2,4) au Cameroun avait besoin d'au moins l'un des trois PA sur la base de déficiences modérées ou sévères. Le besoin total était le plus élevé pour les lunettes de distance [3,7% (IC95%: 2,8-4,7) Inde; 0,8% (IC95%: 0,5-1,1), Cameroun] et le plus faible pour les chaises roulantes (0,1% dans les deux paramètres; IC95%: 0,03-0,3 Inde, IC95%: 0,04-0,3 Cameroun). La couverture pour chaque PA était inférieure à 40%, sauf pour les lunettes de distance en Inde, où elle était de 87% (IC95%: 77,1-93,0). La concordance entre l'auto-déclaration et l'évaluation clinique de la déficience du besoin en PA était faible. Par exemple, en Inde, 60% des personnes identifiées lors de l'évaluation clinique comme ayant besoin de lunettes de distance n'ont pas autodéclaré un besoin. A l'inverse, en Inde, 75% des personnes qui ont déclaré avoir besoin de lunettes de distance n'en avaient pas besoin sur la base d'une évaluation clinique de la déficience. CONCLUSIONS: Il y a un besoin élevé et une faible offre de trois PA dans deux milieux à revenu faible et intermédiaire. Les lacunes méthodologiques soulignent le besoin de méthodes d'enquête améliorées compatibles avec la classification internationale du fonctionnement, du handicap et de la santé pour estimer les besoins au niveau de la population en PA et en services connexes pour éclairer le plaidoyer et la planification.

Effect of Holding Objects on the Occurrence of Head Impact in Falls by Older Adults: Evidence From Real-Life Falls in Long-Term Care.

BACKGROUND: Falls cause approximately 80% of traumatic brain injuries in older adults, and nearly one third of falls by residents in long-term care (LTC) result in head impact. Holding objects during falls, such as mobility aids, may affect the ability of LTC residents to avoid head impact by arresting the fall with their upper limbs. We examined the prevalence of holding objects and their effect on risk for head impact during real-life falls in older adults living in LTC. METHODS: We analyzed videos of 1105 real-life falls from standing height by 425 LTC residents, using a validated questionnaire to characterize the occurrence of head impact and whether the resident held objects during descent and impact. We classified objects as either "weight-bearing" (via contact to the fixed environment, eg, chairs and walkers) or "non-weight-bearing" (eg, cups) and tested their effect on odds for head impact with generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Residents held objects in more than 60% of falls. The odds for head impact were reduced for falls where weight-bearing objects were held or grasped during descent (odds ratio = 0.52; 95% confidence interval = 0.39-0.70) or maintained throughout the fall (odds ratio = 0.34; 95% confidence interval = 0.23-0.49). The most commonly held objects were chairs/wheelchairs (23% of cases), tables/counters (10% of cases), and walkers/rollators (22% of cases); all reduced the odds of head impact when held during descent. Holding non-weight-bearing objects did not affect the odds of head impact (odds ratio = 1.00; 95% confidence interval = 0.64-1.55). CONCLUSION: Our results show that older adults in LTC use held, weight-bearing objects to reduce their risk for head impact during falls.

Experience of Filipinos with Spinal Cord Injury in the Use of Assistive Technology: An Occupational Justice Perspective.

Assistive technology (AT) is often required to facilitate the performance of occupations and promote inclusion and reduction of dependency among persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, only 5-15% of individuals in developing countries have access to AT. This study is aimed at exploring the experience of Filipinos with SCI as they use AT and understand these from an occupational justice (OJ) perspective. This study utilised a hermeneutic phenomenological approach to explore the participants' experiences with AT usage. Ten participants were recruited from a hospital and communities within Metro Manila, Philippines, and interviewed last January 2020. Hermeneutic analysis was done to interpret the shared meaning embedded within their experiences and was informed by an occupational justice perspective. Exploring the experience of the participants in using AT yielded four themes, namely, (1) engaging in occupations despite limited opportunities, (2) going to various locations amidst an inaccessible environment, (3) striving towards inclusion in spite of attitudinal barriers, and (4) securing needs in light of unfavourable life conditions. Filipinos with SCI deal with numerous structural and contextual factors in daily life. There has been partial enablement of OJ as they incorporate AT in their daily lives as occupational rights are far from being recognised and respected. In infusing an OJ perspective to understanding AT use, OT practitioners are bound to identify problems and courses of action that go beyond traditional service delivery.

Necesidad y uso de productos de apoyo y facilitadores arquitectónicos en población dependiente / Need and use of assistive devices and architectural facilitators in a dependent population

OBJETIVO: Describir la utilización y percepción de la necesidad de productos de apoyo e identificar su asociación con instrumentos para medir la dependencia y la sobrecarga de cuidados. DISEÑO: Estudio transversal. Emplazamiento: Atención Primaria del área sur de Pontevedra. PARTICIPANTES: Un total de 112 personas cuidadoras informales que atienden a 125 personas dependientes. Mediciones principales: Mediante entrevista personal se recogen datos sobre la utilización y percepción de necesidad de estos productos. Además, se obtienen datos sociodemográficos e información referida al tiempo dedicado al cuidado diario, la sobrecarga del cuidador, el Baremo de Valoración de Dependencia y el indicador de dependencia DEP-6D. Se ha utilizado un contraste de medias para identificar si existen diferencias significativas en dichos indicadores en función de si utilizan o no los productos facilitadores. Se ha calculado una regresión logística para identificar aquellas variables asociadas con tener una necesidad no cubierta. RESULTADOS: Un 60% (IC 95%: 50,9-68,7) de las personas dependientes tienen necesidades no cubiertas de estos dispositivos. Estas necesidades se asocian, principalmente, con una renta familiar baja, un mayor grado de dependencia y una mejor salud del cuidador, aunque en situaciones de gran dependencia y muy mala salud del cuidador estas carencias se suavizan. CONCLUSIONES: Existe una fuerte asociación entre grado de dependencia y utilización de estos productos. Sin embargo, también hay un elevado porcentaje de la muestra con necesidades no cubiertas de estos productos que están asociadas tanto con la situación socioeconómica del hogar como con las características del dependiente y de la persona cuidadora

OBJECTIVE: To describe the use and perception of the need for assistive devices and identify their relationship with instruments to measure dependence and caregiver burden. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. LOCATION: Primary Health Care in the southern area of Pontevedra. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 112 informal caregivers providing care to 125 dependent persons. Key measurements: Through a personal interview, data was collected on the use and perception of the need for these devices. In addition, sociodemographic data and information on the time dedicated to daily care, caregiver burden, the Dependency Rating Scale, and the DEP-6D dependency indicator were obtained. A contrast mean was used to identify whether there are significant differences in these indicators, depending on whether or not they use the facilitator devices. A logistic regression was performed to identify those variables most associated with not having a need covered. RESULTS: More than half (60%: 95% CI; 50.9-68.7) of dependent persons have unmet needs for these devices. These needs are mainly associated with a low family income, a high degree of dependence, and better health of the caregiver; although in extreme situations of greater dependence and worse health of the caregiver these deficiencies are smoothed out. CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong association between the level of dependence and the use of these devices. However, there is a high percentage of the sample that do not have the products that they need, which are associated with the socioeconomic situation of the household as well as with the characteristics of the dependent person and the caregiver

Mobility Device Use and Mobility Disability in U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Cancer History.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To examine the prevalence of mobility device use in U.S. community-dwelling older adults including older adults with cancer history ("survivors") and to estimate mobility disability noting variation by cancer history, cancer site, and other factors to improve early detection of mobility limitations. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis from the 2011 National Health and Aging Trends Study. SETTING: In-person interviews in the homes of study participants. PARTICIPANTS: Nationally representative sample of community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries, aged 65 and older (n = 6,080 including 1,203 survivors). MEASUREMENTS: Participants were asked about cancer history, pain that limited activity, mobility device use (eg, canes, walkers, wheelchairs, and scooters), history of falls, and medical conditions plus they were assessed for approximate mobility disability using a 3-m gait speed test. The results were scored on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = lowest, 4 = highest) using criteria from the National Institute on Aging. RESULTS: A total of 19% of older adults and 23% of survivors reported using one or more mobility device, most commonly a single-point cane. Approximately 10% of breast, 6% of prostate, and 3% of colorectal cancer survivors reported using two or more devices in the past month. Survivors had lower mean gait speed scores (2.27) than adults without cancer history (2.39). In regression models, survivors were 18% less likely than adults without cancer history to score high on the gait speed test (odds ratio = .82; P < .05). Prior mobility device use, history of multiple falls, unhealthy weight, Black race, multimorbidity, and pain that limited activity were associated with lower gait speed scores in all participants (all P < .05). CONCLUSION: A greater proportion of older survivors used mobility devices than adults without cancer history. Mobility device use varied by cancer site and was highest in survivors of breast, colorectal, and gynecological cancer. Survivors were also more likely to show signs of mobility disability, based on gait speed, compared with adults without cancer history. These indications, although modest, suggest that older survivors may require special attention to functional changes in survivorship.

Home-Based Cognitively Assistive Robots: Maximizing Cognitive Functioning and Maintaining Independence in Older Adults Without Dementia.

Promoting health and prolonging independence in the home is a priority for older adults, caregivers, clinicians, and society at large. Rapidly developing robotics technology provides a platform for interventions, with the fields of physically and socially assistive robots expanding in recent years. However, less attention has been paid to using robots to enhance the cognitive health of older adults. The goal of this review is to synthesize the current literature on home-based cognitively assistive robots (CAR) in older adults without dementia and to provide suggestions to improve the quality of the scientific evidence in this subfield. First, we set the stage for CAR by: a) introducing the field of robotics to improve health, b) summarizing evidence emphasizing the importance of home-based interventions for older adults, c) reviewing literature on robot acceptability in older adults, d) highlighting important ethical issues in healthcare robotics, and e) reviewing current findings on socially assistive robots, with a focus on translating findings to the CAR context. With this foundation in place, we then review the literature on CAR, identifying gaps and limitations of current evidence, and proposing future directions for research. We conclude that CAR is promising and feasible and that there is a need for more methodologically rigorous evaluations of CAR to promote prolonged home-based independence in older adults.

Perceived Barriers Before and After a 3-Month Period of Modified Ride-On Car Use.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to examine how perceived barriers change before and after a 3-month period of modified ride-on car use. METHODS: This study used a qualitative content analysis of perceived barriers. Fourteen caregivers (13 mothers; 1 grandmother) responded to a single-question, free-response survey before and after a 3-month period of modified ride-on car use. RESULTS: A total of 11 and 20 perceived barriers were reported before and after the 3-month period. Environmental barriers were the most frequently reported before and after the 3-month period. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric physical therapists need to be aware of the potential perceived barriers that families may experience in regard to young children with disabilities using modified ride-on cars and determine strategies to support families on an individual basis.

Purchase and use of home healthcare devices for the elderly: a pilot study in Shanghai, China.

BACKGROUND: In China, home-based healthcare/rehabilitation has always been advocated by the government and is the most prevalent healthcare pattern. However, there is currently no data on how many each product has been purchased, and it is not clear what factors are associated with their use. The research aims to clarify the current practices and attitudes of the elderly on such matters, and further analyze their influence factors. METHODS: This pilot study consisted of two-round regional survey, conducted from July 25 to August 3, 2015 and July 20 to August 10, 2018 respectively. Both surveys released on-site paper questionnaires and collected after filling out in different communities. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-four valid questionnaires from 52 communities were collected. Compared with 2015 (30.8%), the number of people who did not purchase home healthcare devices in the same area decreased in 2018 (28.2%). Hemopiezometer (44.3%), glucometer (18.4%), massager (21.3%) and walking devices (19.3%) are the four main types of products that urbanites are most willing to buy. In addition, users' age group, education level, and income level were significantly correlated with the purchase of certain products. CONCLUSIONS: The types of home healthcare devices purchased by respondents are consistent with the distribution of chronic diseases of urban residents in China. The analysis of product brands also revealed the existing problems and huge growth space of the industry market, which also requires the government to introduce relevant policies and measures to regulate the market and accelerate the development of the industry.

Assistive Technology and Mobile ICT Usage Among Oldest-Old Cohorts: Comparison of the Oldest-Old in Private Homes and in Long-Term Care Facilities.

This study examines technology adoption among oldest-old cohorts (80+) in private homes and long-term care facilities and analyzes relationships between individual characteristics, the living environment, and different kinds of assistive technologies (AT) and information and communication technologies (ICT). The data analysis is based on a representative survey of the oldest-old group's quality of life and well-being in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany (N = 1,863; age range: 80-103; 12.7% long-term care). Descriptive and multiple binary logistic regression analyses were conducted. Fewer than 3% of people in long-term care used internet-connected ICT devices. AT and ICT device adoption is associated with the living environment and individual characteristics (e.g., functional health, chronological age, education, and technology interest), and different patterns of ICT and AT use can be observed. These results indicate that individual characteristics and the living environment are both decisive in the use of technology among the oldest-old group.

Perceived Barriers of Modified Ride-On Car Use of Young Children With Disabilities: A Content Analysis.

PURPOSE: Modified ride-on cars have emerged as an early powered mobility option for young children with disabilities. The purpose of this study was to identify, extract, and synthesize perceived barriers of modified ride-on car use reported in previous studies. METHODS: This study was descriptive using a qualitative content analysis of previously published studies identified from a systematic literature search. RESULTS: Categories of perceived barriers were identified: device, environmental, child-related perceived barriers regarding health, tolerance, and abilities, and caregiver-related perceived barriers regarding physical requirements, time, and motivation. Device and environmental perceived barriers were the most reported. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric physical therapists play a critical role in working with families to promote their self-efficacy for using the modified ride-on car and their capacity for overcoming the inherent difficulties associated with use. Most of the reported perceived barriers are modifiable, at least to some degree, with likely effects on modified ride-on car use.

Prevalence of falls in frail elderly users of ambulatory assistive devices: a comparative study.

Aim: The aim of this study was to verify the prevalence of falls in frail users of ambulatory assistive devices (AAD) and compare with controls.Materials and methods: Nineteen frail elderly users of AAD (G1) and 31 non-users (G2) participated in the study. The occurrence of falls, at the last 6 months, was collected by an interview with the patient and the caregiver. Cognitive status was assessed by the Mini Mental State Examination, functional capacity by the Pfeffer's Questionnaire and Modified Barthel's Index, the frail level by a functional stratification and the risk of falls by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. T-Student test was used to compare independent variables. The significance level was set at 5%.Results: Both groups G1 and G2 were homogeneous in relation to the functional and sociodemographic variables. G1 reported more falls in the last 6 months, but most of the participants did not use AAD at the time of the fall. Transferences were the main reason for falls in G1 and stumble in the street in G2.Conclusion: Elderly users of AAD fall out when they are not using the walk device.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONFalling is the second leading cause of death from unintentional injuries in the world. Fall prevention programmes prescribe ambulatory assistive devices, such as walking sticks, crutches and walkers device and walking training with a physiotherapist to provide independence, safety, satisfaction, adherence and psychosocial benefits. However, studies have showed a higher prevalence of falls in frail elderly users of ambulatory-assistive devices.In our study, we verified if users of the ambulatory-assistive devices were using it at the moment of the fall. We found that frail elderly fall down when they are not using the walk device during their activities of day living. Thus, education strategies should be developed to encourage the use of ambulatory-assistive devices by the frail elderly previously evaluated by physiotherapists. Prevalence of falls in this population could reduce if frail elderly users of ambulatory assistive devices really use it during the activities of daily living.

Assistive technology: Understanding the needs and experiences of individuals with autism spectrum disorder and/or intellectual disability in Ireland and the UK.

Assistive technologies (ATs) aimed at improving the life quality of persons with Autism Spectrum Disorder and/or Intellectual Disability (ASD/ID) is an important research area. Few have examined how this population use and experience AT or their vision for future uses of AT. The present study aimed to update and extend previous research and provides insight from caregivers, and other stakeholders (n = 96), living in Ireland and the United Kingdom, on their experiences of assistive technology (AT) for ASD/ID. Caregiver and professional responses to an anonymous online survey showed that focus individuals were rated low in terms of independent and self-management skills, with scheduling and planning and communication identified as desirable future AT functions. Overall, positive experiences of AT were reported, with AT use more than doubling in recent years.

Parents act as intermediary users for their children when using assistive technology for cognition in everyday planning: Results from a parental survey.

Assistive Technology for Cognition (ATC) is employed by children with and without disabilities. However, how the ATC is used in everyday life has not been studied. The current study investigated ATC-usage in everyday planning in three groups: 1) children qualifying for Swedish habilitation centers (ID/ASD), 2) children with disability not qualifying for habilitation service (ADHD), and 3) children with typical development (TD). A parental survey was conducted (n = 192) and answers were analyzed with statistical tests and inductive thematic text analysis. Results showed that all groups used ATC, most in the Habilitation group and least in the TD group. According to parents, ATC supported cognitive functions in all groups, but it became evident that the parents were responsible for planning by setting up the ATC, whilst the children merely executed the plans. This was linked to several limitations, for example the design was not appropriately adapted for these groups. The implications for the practitioners are 1) evaluate the users' cognitive abilities and choose an ATC suitable for that individual rather focusing on the diagnosis, and 2) follow up usage to see if it is the parent or the child that are using the ATC.

Income and Other Contributors to Poor Outcomes in U.S. Patients with Sarcoidosis.

Rationale: Socioeconomic factors are associated with worse disease severity at presentation in sarcoidosis, but the relative importance of socioeconomic variables on morbidity and disease burden has not been fully elucidated.Objectives: To determine the association between income and sarcoidosis outcomes after controlling for socioeconomic and disease-related factors.Methods: Using the Sarcoidosis Advanced Registry for Cures database, we analyzed data from 2,318 patients with sarcoidosis in the United States to determine the effect of income and other variables on outcomes. We divided comorbidities arising after diagnosis into those likely related to steroid use and those likely related to sarcoidosis. We assessed the development of health-related, functional, and socioeconomic outcomes following the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.Measurements and Main Results: In multivariate analysis, low-income patients had significantly higher rates of new sarcoidosis-related comorbidities (<$35,000, odds ratio [OR], 2.4 [1.7-3.3]; $35,000-84,999, OR, 1.4 [1.1-1.9]; and ≥$85,000 [reference (Ref)]) and new steroid-related comorbidities (<$35,000, OR, 1.3 [0.9-2.0]; $35,000-84,999, OR, 1.5 [1.1-2.1]; and ≥$85,000 [Ref]), had lower health-related quality of life as assessed by the Sarcoidosis Health Questionnaire (P < 0.001), and experienced more impact on family finances (<$35,000, OR, 7.9 [4.9-12.7]; $35,000-84,999, OR, 2.7 [1.9-3.9]; and ≥$85,000 [Ref]). The use of supplemental oxygen, need for assistive devices, and job loss were more common in lower income patients. Development of comorbidities after diagnosis of sarcoidosis occurred in 63% of patients and were strong independent predictors of poor outcomes. In random forest modeling, income was consistently a leading predictor of outcome.Conclusions: These results suggest the burden from sarcoidosis preferentially impacts the economically disadvantaged.