RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Documentation of resuscitation preferences is crucial for patients undergoing surgery. Unfortunately, this remains an area for improvement at many institutions. We conducted a quality improvement initiative to enhance documentation percentages by integrating perioperative resuscitation checks into the surgical workflow. Specifically, we aimed to increase the percentage of general surgery patients with documented resuscitation statuses from 82% to 90% within a 1-year period. METHODS: Three key change ideas were developed. First, surgical consent forms were modified to include the patient's resuscitation status. Second, the resuscitation status was added to the routinely used perioperative surgical checklist. Finally, patient resources on resuscitation processes and options were updated with support from patient partners. An audit survey was distributed mid-way through the interventions to evaluate process measures. RESULTS: The initiatives were successful in reaching our study aim of 90% documentation rate for all general surgery patients. The audit revealed a high uptake of the new consent forms, moderate use of the surgical checklist, and only a few patients for whom additional resuscitation details were added to their clinical note. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully increased the documentation percentage of resuscitation statuses within our large tertiary care center by incorporating checks into routine forms to prompt the conversation with patients early.
Asunto(s)
Documentación , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Humanos , Documentación/normas , Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Lista de Verificación , Órdenes de Resucitación , Cirugía General/normas , Resucitación/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Medical scribes have been utilized to reduce electronic health record (EHR) associated documentation burden. Although evidence suggests benefits to scribes, no large-scale studies have quantitatively evaluated scribe impact on physician documentation across clinical settings. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of scribes on physician EHR documentation behaviors and performance. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used EHR audit log data from a large academic health system to evaluate clinical documentation for all ambulatory encounters between January 2014 and December 2019 to evaluate the effect of scribes on physician documentation behaviors. Scribe services were provided on a first-come, first-served basis on physician request. Based on a physician's scribe use, encounters were grouped into 3 categories: never using a scribe, prescribe (before scribe use), or using a scribe. Outcomes included chart closure time, the proportion of delinquent charts, and charts closed after-hours. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-five physicians (23% scribe users) across 29 medical subspecialties, encompassing 1,132,487 encounters, were included in the analysis. At baseline, scribe users had higher chart closure time, delinquent charts, and after-hours documentation than physicians who never used scribes. Among scribe users, the difference in outcome measures postscribe compared with baseline varied, and using a scribe rarely resulted in outcome measures approaching a range similar to the performance levels of nonusing physicians. In addition, there was variability in outcome measures across medical specialties and within similar subspecialties. CONCLUSION: Although scribes may improve documentation efficiency among some physicians, not all will improve EHR-related documentation practices. Different strategies may help to optimize documentation behaviors of physician-scribe dyads and maximize outcomes of scribe implementation.
Asunto(s)
Documentación , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Documentación/métodos , Documentación/normas , Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
Natural Language Processing (NLP), a form of Artificial Intelligence, allows free-text based clinical documentation to be integrated in ways that facilitate data analysis, data interpretation and formation of individualized medical and obstetrical care. In this cross-sectional study, we identified all births during the study period carrying the radiology-confirmed diagnosis of fibroid uterus in pregnancy (defined as size of largest diameter of >5 cm) by using an NLP platform and compared it to non-NLP derived data using ICD10 codes of the same diagnosis. We then compared the two sets of data and stratified documentation gaps by race. Using fibroid uterus in pregnancy as a marker, we found that Black patients were more likely to have the diagnosis entered late into the patient's chart or had missing documentation of the diagnosis. With appropriate algorithm definitions, cross referencing and thorough validation steps, NLP can contribute to identifying areas of documentation gaps and improve quality of care.
Asunto(s)
Documentación , Procesamiento de Lenguaje Natural , Neoplasias Uterinas , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Estudios Transversales , Documentación/normas , Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagen , Racismo , Leiomioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Obstetricia , Complicaciones Neoplásicas del Embarazo/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Interrupted time series analysis of a retrospective, electronic health record cohort. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between the implementation of Medicare's sepsis reporting measure (SEP-1) and sepsis diagnosis rates as assessed in clinical documentation. BACKGROUND: The role of health policy in the effort to improve sepsis diagnosis remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients hospitalized with suspected infection and organ dysfunction within 6 hours of presentation to the emergency department, admitted to one of 11 hospitals in a multi-hospital health system from January 2013 to December 2017. Clinician-diagnosed sepsis, as reflected by the inclusion of the terms "sepsis" or "septic" in the text of clinical notes in the first two calendar days following presentation. RESULTS: Among 44,074 adult patients with sepsis admitted to 11 hospitals over 5 years, the proportion with sepsis documentation was 32.2% just before the implementation of SEP-1 in the third quarter of 2015 and increased to 37.3% by the fourth quarter of 2017. Of the 9 post-SEP-1 quarters, 8 had odds ratios for a sepsis diagnosis >1 (overall range: 0.98-1.26; P value for a joint test of statistical significance = 0.005). The effects were clinically modest, with a maximum effect of an absolute increase of 4.2% (95% CI: 0.9-7.8) at the end of the study period. The effect was greater in patients who did not require vasopressors compared with patients who required vasopressors ( P value for test of interaction = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: SEP-1 implementation was associated with modest increases in sepsis diagnosis rates, primarily among patients who did not require vasoactive medications.
Asunto(s)
Documentación , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Medicare , Sepsis , Humanos , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Estados Unidos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Documentación/normas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objective of this quality-improvement project was to increase documentation rates of anthropometrics (measured weight, length/height, and body mass index [BMI], which are critical to identify patients at malnutrition (undernutrition) risk) from <50% to 80% within 24 hours of hospital admission for pediatric patients. METHODS: Multidisciplinary champion teams on surgical, cardiac, and intensive care (ICU) pilot units were established to identify and iteratively test interventions addressing barriers to documentation from May 2016 to June 2018. Percentage of patients with documented anthropometrics <24 h of admission was assessed monthly by statistical process control methodology. Percentage of patients at malnutrition (undernutrition) risk by anthropometrics was compared by χ2 for 4 months before and after intervention. RESULTS: Anthropometric documentation rates significantly increased (P < 0.001 for all): BMI, from 11% to 89% (surgical), 33% to 57% (cardiac), and 16% to 51% (ICU); measured weight, from 24% to 88% (surgical), 69% to 83% (cardiac), and 51% to 67% (ICU); and length/height, from 12% to 89% (surgical), 38% to 57% (cardiac), and 26% to 63% (ICU). Improvement hospital-wide was observed (BMI, 42% to 70%, P < 0.001) with formal dissemination tactics. For pilot units, moderate/severe malnutrition (undernutrition) rates tripled (1.2% [24 of 2081] to 3.4% [81 of 2374], P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Documentation of anthropometrics on admission substantially improved after establishing multidisciplinary champion teams. Goal rate (80%) was achieved within 26 months for all anthropometrics in the surgical unit and for weight in the cardiac unit. Improved documentation rates led to significant increase in identification of patients at malnutrition (undernutrition) risk.
Asunto(s)
Antropometría , Índice de Masa Corporal , Peso Corporal , Desnutrición , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Humanos , Niño , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Desnutrición/diagnóstico , Desnutrición/epidemiología , Lactante , Niño Hospitalizado/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , Documentación/normas , Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Documentación/métodos , EstaturaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of synoptic reporting has been shown to improve documentation of critical information and provide added value related to data access and extraction, data reliability, relevant detail, and completeness of information. Surgeon acceptance and adoption of synoptic reports has lagged behind other specialties. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the process of implementing a synoptic operative report. DESIGN: This study was a mixed-methods process evaluation including surveys and qualitative interviews. SETTINGS: This study focused on colorectal surgery practices across the United States. PATIENTS: Twenty-eight board-certified colorectal surgeons were included. INTERVENTIONS: The synoptic operative report for rectal cancer was implemented. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Acceptability, feasibility, and usability were measured by Likert-type survey questions and followed up with individual interviews to elicit experiences with implementation as well as motivations and barriers to use. RESULTS: Among all study participants, 28 surgeons completed the electronic survey (76% response rate) and 21 (57%) completed the telephone interview. Mean usability was 4.14 (range, 1-5; SE, 0.15), mean feasibility was 3.90 (SE, 0.15), and acceptability was 3.98 (SE, 0.18). Participants indicated that substantial administrative and technical support were necessary but not always available for implementation, and many were frustrated by the need to change their workflow. LIMITATIONS: Most surgeon participants were male, white, had >12 years in practice, and used Epic electronic medical record systems. Therefore, they may not represent the perspectives of all US colon and rectal surgeons. In addition, as the synoptic operative report is implemented more broadly across the United States, it will be important to consider variations in the process by electronic medical record system. CONCLUSIONS: The synoptic operative report for rectal cancer was easy to implement and incorporate into workflow, in general, but surgeons remained concerned about additional burden without immediate and tangible value. Despite recognizing benefits, many participants indicated they only implemented the synoptic operative report because it was mandated by the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B735MOTIVACIONES Y BARRERAS HACIA LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE UN INFORME OPERATIVO SINÓPTICO DE CÁNCER RECTAL: UNA EVALUACIÓN DEL PROCESOANTECEDENTES:Se ha demostrado que el uso de informes sinópticos mejora la documentación de información crítica y proporciona un valor agregado relacionado con el acceso y extracción de datos, la confiabilidad de los datos, los detalles relevantes y la integridad de la información. La aceptación y adopción de informes sinópticos por parte de los cirujanos se ha quedado rezagada con respecto a otras especialidades.OBJETIVO:Evaluar el proceso de implementación de un informe operativo sinóptico.DISEÑO:Evaluación de procesos de métodos mixtos que incluyen encuestas y entrevistas cualitativas.AJUSTES:Prácticas de cirugía colorrectal en los Estados Unidos.PACIENTES:Veintiocho cirujanos colorrectales certificados por la junta.INTERVENCIONES:Implementación del informe operatorio sinóptico de cáncer de recto.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Aceptabilidad, viabilidad y usabilidad medidas por preguntas de encuestas tipo Likert y seguidas con entrevistas individuales para obtener experiencias con la implementación, así como motivaciones y barreras para el uso.RESULTADOS:Entre todos los participantes del estudio, 28 cirujanos completaron la encuesta electrónica (tasa de respuesta del 76%) y 21 (57%) completaron la entrevista telefónica. La usabilidad media fue 4,14 (rango = 1-5, error estándar (EE) = 0,15), la factibilidad media fue 3,90 (EE = 0,15) y la aceptabilidad fue 3,98 (EE = 0,18). Los participantes indicaron que se necesitaba un apoyo administrativo y técnico sustancial, pero que no siempre estaba disponible para la implementación y muchos se sintieron frustrados por la necesidad de cambiar su flujo de trabajo.LIMITACIONES:La mayoría de los cirujanos participantes eran hombres, blancos, tenían >12 años en la práctica y usaban sistemas de registros médicos electrónicos de Epic. Por lo tanto, es posible que no representen las perspectivas de todos los cirujanos de colon y recto de EE. UU. Además, a medida que el informe operativo sinóptico se implemente de manera más amplia en los EE. UU., Será importante considerar las variaciones en el proceso por sistema EMR.CONCLUSIONES:El informe quirúrgico sinóptico para el cáncer de recto fue en general fácil de implementar e incorporar en el flujo de trabajo, pero los cirujanos seguían preocupados por la carga adicional sin valor inmediato y tangible. A pesar de reconocer los beneficios, muchos participantes indicaron que solo implementaron el informe operativo sinóptico porque era un mandato del Programa Nacional de Acreditación para el Cáncer de Recto. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B735 (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo).
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Colorrectal , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Documentación , Motivación , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Cirujanos , Flujo de Trabajo , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Cirugía Colorrectal/métodos , Cirugía Colorrectal/estadística & datos numéricos , Barreras de Comunicación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Documentación/métodos , Documentación/normas , Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/organización & administración , Femenino , Intercambio de Información en Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Cirujanos/psicología , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cancer recurrence is an important measure of the impact of cancer treatment. However, no population-based data on recurrence are available. Pathology reports could potentially identify cancer recurrences. Their utility to capture recurrences is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This analysis assesses the sensitivity of pathology reports to identify patients with cancer recurrence and the stage at recurrence. SUBJECTS: The study includes patients with recurrent breast (n=214) or colorectal (n=203) cancers. RESEARCH DESIGN: This retrospective analysis included patients from a population-based cancer registry who were part of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Study, a project that followed cancer patients in-depth for 5 years after diagnosis to identify recurrences. MEASURES: Information abstracted from pathology reports for patients with recurrence was compared with their PCOR data (gold standard) to determine what percent had a pathology report at the time of recurrence, the sensitivity of text in the report to identify recurrence, and if the stage at recurrence could be determined from the pathology report. RESULTS: One half of cancer patients had a pathology report near the time of recurrence. For patients with a pathology report, the report's sensitivity to identify recurrence was 98.1% for breast cancer cases and 95.7% for colorectal cancer cases. The specific stage at recurrence from the pathology report had a moderate agreement with gold-standard data. CONCLUSIONS: Pathology reports alone cannot measure population-based recurrence of solid cancers but can identify specific cohorts of recurrent cancer patients. As electronic submission of pathology reports increases, these reports may identify specific recurrent patients in near real-time.
Asunto(s)
Documentación/normas , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/patología , Recurrencia , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Documentación/métodos , Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Survivorship care plans (SCP) should outline pertinent information about cancer treatment and follow-up. METHODS: We descriptively analyzed the content of 74 colorectal cancer SCPs completed as part of a randomized, controlled trial of SCPs at an academic and community cancer center. Surveillance recommendations were compared with American Cancer Society, American Society of Clinical Oncology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. RESULTS: SCP information provided in >80% of the plans included participant age, cancer diagnosis, details, and side-effects of treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation) and health promotion recommendations. SCP content documented less frequently included predisposing conditions, genetic counseling/testing information and staging. Posttreatment surveillance recommendations were documented in >90% SCPs. For stage 2-3 cancer, rates of guideline concordant recommendations were 100% for colonoscopy surveillance (Year 1 only), 87% for imaging surveillance, 65% for carcinoembryonic antigen surveillance, and 33% for follow-up visits. Excluding colonoscopy, >15 unique recommendations were listed for each modality across stages and sites, with more variation at the academic site. CONCLUSIONS: SCPs consistently recorded information about cancer diagnosis and treatment but omitted critical information about cancer-specific details denoting risk. Surveillance recommendations varied considerably between cancer centers. Future work to improve the consistency of surveillance recommendations documented in SCPs may be needed.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/normas , Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/terapia , Planificación de Atención al Paciente/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia , SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the accuracy of documentation of trauma activations in the electronic medical record (EMR) compared with a paper chart. Our primary objective was to compare the accuracy of documentation between a paper chart and EMR in pediatric trauma. METHODS: We studied video recordings of trauma activations at a level 1 pediatric trauma center. These videos were reviewed, and data points collected were used to compare accuracy of documentation in the paper chart and EMR. RESULTS: We reviewed 106 videos with 1614 data points collected. Of those, 805 data points were compared with their corresponding paper chart with 710 data points correctly documented (88.2%). The remaining 809 data points were compared with their corresponding electronic documentation after implementation of the EMR with 681 data points being correctly documented (84.2%). Overall, we found that paper documentation was significantly more accurate than the EMR (p = 0.019). When analyzed in subcategories of pre-arrival information, primary and secondary survey, and interventions, paper documentation was found to be significantly more accurate than the EMR for components of the primary and secondary survey (87.3% vs. 80.4%, p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in accuracy of documentation between paper and EMR for pre-arrival information (88.1% vs. 89.4%) or interventions (90.3% vs. 92%). CONCLUSION: Documentation of trauma activations is overall more accurate using a paper chart than EMR. Although documentation was accurate for most categories using both a paper chart and EMR, we found significantly less accuracy in documentation of the primary and secondary survey in the EMR.
Asunto(s)
Exactitud de los Datos , Documentación/métodos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Papel , Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas y Lesiones , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Documentación/normas , Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/normas , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos/normas , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Grabación en Video , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico , Heridas y Lesiones/terapiaRESUMEN
Semantic mining is always a challenge for big biomedical text data. Ontology has been widely proved and used to extract semantic information. However, the process of ontology-based semantic similarity calculation is so complex that it cannot measure the similarity for big text data. To solve this problem, we propose a parallelized semantic similarity measurement method based on Hadoop MapReduce for big text data. At first, we preprocess and extract the semantic features from documents. Then, we calculate the document semantic similarity based on ontology network structure under MapReduce framework. Finally, based on the generated semantic document similarity, document clusters are generated via clustering algorithms. To validate the effectiveness, we use two kinds of open datasets. The experimental results show that the traditional methods can hardly work for more than ten thousand biomedical documents. The proposed method keeps efficient and accurate for big dataset and is of high parallelism and scalability.
Asunto(s)
Macrodatos , Análisis por Conglomerados , Minería de Datos/métodos , Semántica , Algoritmos , Ontologías Biológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Biología Computacional , Minería de Datos/estadística & datos numéricos , Documentación/métodos , Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , MEDLINE/estadística & datos numéricos , Aprendizaje AutomáticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine how often travel histories are obtained in pediatric patients. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review was performed at a single tertiary care children's hospital for patients aged 2 months to 18 years who were admitted October 2015-December 2017 with International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes for potential travel-related illnesses. Demographic information and travel history documentation were obtained, along with travel-related testing. From May to June 2018, prospective, single-blinded, direct observation of a convenience sample of pediatric residents was performed during the initial patient encounter to determine the frequency and quality of travel histories obtained regardless of documentation. RESULTS: Of 249 charts reviewed, 27 (10.8%) patients had a travel history query documented. Patients with complex chronic conditions were significantly less likely to have a travel history documented (37% vs 67%; P = 0.005). Age, sex, length of stay, race, payer status, and critical care admission did not significantly differ between groups. Those with a travel history documented were more likely to have a documented exposure history (100% vs 52%; P < 0.001) and additional testing performed (56% vs 13%, P < 0.001). During this time, a simulation course with residents featuring travel-related diagnoses led to a significant increase in documented travel histories (5% prior versus 21% after, P = 0.03). A total of 37 patient encounters were observed; travel history was asked for 4 times (4/37, 10.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Travel histories are rarely asked for in pediatric patients. Missed diagnoses may not only affect the patient but also have broader public health implications. Simulation is an effective tool to improve history-taking skills, yet more work is still needed.
Asunto(s)
Documentación/normas , Anamnesis/métodos , Pediatría/métodos , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Enfermedad Relacionada con los Viajes , Niño , Preescolar , Documentación/métodos , Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Pediatría/normas , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) predicts the risk of malignancy for the different categories of the ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). The objective of this study is to investigate the efficiencies of the v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) V600E mutation test and the TBSRTC categories in distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid nodules. METHODS: In this study, 362 ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) samples from 344 patients aged from 17 to 76âyears old were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were classified into six groups (I-VI) according to the TBSRTC system. The amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR) was used to evaluate the BRAF V600E mutation level in total 362 samples. Among of the 344 patients, 128 patients (131 thyroid nodules) who underwent surgeries were followed by histopathological examination. The predictive values of the BRAF V600E mutation test and TBSRTC categories were evaluated in these 131 thyroid nodules. RESULTS: The median ages of the patients in the TBSRTC IV-VI group were smaller than those in the TBSRTC I-III groups. The proportion of nodules over 1âcm was larger than it in the TBSRTC IV group compared to the other groups. Significant differences in BRAF V600E mutation were observed (Pâ<â.001) among these six groups. The sensitivity (89.57%) for the detection of malignant thyroid nodules, negative predictive value (NPV; 45.45%) for the detection of benign nodules, and accuracy (86.26%) for distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid nodules increased by combining the BRAF V600E mutation test and TBSRTC system when compared with the BRAF V600E mutation test and TBSRTC system respectively. The BRAF V600E mutation test alone demonstrated the increased positive predictive value (PPV; 98.91%) and specificity (93.75%) for the detection of malignant thyroid nodules compared to the TBSRTC method (alone or in combination with the BRAF V600E method). CONCLUSION: In summary, significant differences in age, nodule diameter, and BRAF V600E mutation were noted among the six categories of the TBSRTC system. The combination of the BRAF V600E mutation test and TBSRTC system demonstrated increases in the NPV, sensitivity, and accuracy, while the BRAF V600E method proved superiority to the TBSRTC system with regard to the PPV and specificity.
Asunto(s)
Documentación/métodos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja Fina/métodos , Biopsia con Aguja Fina/estadística & datos numéricos , China , Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación/genética , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Importance: Physician turnover takes a heavy toll on patients, physicians, and health care organizations. Survey research has established associations of electronic health record (EHR) use with professional burnout and reduction in professional effort, but these findings are subject to response fatigue and bias. Objective: To evaluate the association of physician productivity and EHR use patterns, as determined by vendor-derived EHR use data platforms, with physician turnover. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted among nonteaching ambulatory physicians at a large ambulatory practice network based in New England. Data were collected from March 2018 to February 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Physician departure from the practice network; 4 time-based core measures of EHR use, normalized to 8 hours of scheduled clinical time; teamwork, percentage of a physician's orders that are placed by other members of the care team; and productivity measures of patient volume, intensity, and demand. Results: Among 335 physicians assessed for eligibility, 314 unique physicians (89.2%) were included in the analysis (123 [39%] women; 100 [32%] aged 45-54 years), with 5663 physician-months of data. The turnover rate was 5.1%/year (32 of 314 physicians). Physicians completed a mean 2.6 appointments/hour (95% CI, 2.5-2.6 appointments/hour) and 206 appointments/month (95% CI, 197-215 appointments/month) with 5.5 hours (95% CI, 5.3-5.8 hours) of EHR time for every 8 hours of scheduled patient time. After controlling for gender, medical specialty, and time, the following variables were associated with turnover: inbox time (odds ratio [OR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-0.82; P < .001), teamwork (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52-0.87; P = .003), demand (ie, proportion of available appointments filled: OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35-0.70; P < .001), and age 45 to 54 years vs 25 to 34 years (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.93; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, physician productivity and EHR use metrics were associated with physician departure. Prospectively tracking these metrics could identify physicians at high risk of departure who would benefit from early, team-based, targeted interventions. The counterintuitive finding that less time spent on the EHR (in particular inbox management) was associated with physician departure warrants further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Documentación/métodos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Reorganización del Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/normas , Área Bajo la Curva , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Correlación de Datos , Estudios Transversales , Documentación/normas , Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration (VA) implemented the comprehensive life-sustaining treatment (LST) Decisions Initiative to provide training and standardize documentation of goals of care and LST preferences for seriously ill Veterans to improve end-of-life (EOL) outcomes. LST documentation is expected for all Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) Veterans because they are at high risk of hospitalization and mortality. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis compared associations between Bereaved Family Survey (BFS) EOL care ratings and LST documentation. Participants were Veterans who died August 1, 2018 through September 30, 2019 in one of 55 VA HBPC programs. Regression modeling generated odds for key BFS outcomes. LST template completion rate was plotted by month to understand the interaction between time, LST completion rate, and EOL care family ratings. RESULTS: LST preferences were documented for 39% of HBPC Veterans. Family members rated overall EOL care as excellent for 53% of Veterans but significant divergence in BFS ratings occurred during the last 7 months of the study with 60% of family members of LST completers rating care as excellent compared with 48% for Veterans lacking LST documentation (p = 0.003). The adjusted odds of rating overall care in the final month of life as excellent was higher among those with a completed LST template (1.64 95% CI 1.19, 2.26). CONCLUSIONS: Higher rates of LST documentation were associated with more favorable ratings of EOL but not in initial months following implementation of the comprehensive initiative; however, LST documentation rates were lower than expected among HBPC Veterans. Following an initial period of implementation of a comprehensive national initiative to promote Veteran choice about care during serious illness, documented LST preferences were associated with better family ratings of EOL care. HBPC clinicians may improve the bereaved family experience by using LSDTI tools and training to elicit and document preferences.
Asunto(s)
Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Familia Militar/psicología , Prioridad del Paciente/psicología , Cuidado Terminal/psicología , Veteranos/psicología , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cuidados para Prolongación de la Vida/psicología , Masculino , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans AffairsRESUMEN
Background: Research on informed consent (IC) has traditionally focused on the documentation of the discussion with patients of potential complications. We sought to examine the completeness of documentation for all elements of IC for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC): potential complications, alternatives to LC and details of the procedure. Differences in the documentation of IC for elective and emergent LC were examined. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing LC at our institution between 2015 and 2017 was performed. Completeness of documentation was defined as documentation of all 3 elements of IC in the clinic note, the operating room note or the consent form itself. Data were analyzed descriptively. We compared documention for emergent and elective cases as well as documentation by residents and attending physicians using t tests. Results: A total of 270 patients were included in the analysis. Only 5 (2%) had complete documentation of all elements of IC. Documentation of potential complications was noted in 232 cases (86%), of which 58 (25%) were elective and 174 (75%) were emergent. Details were noted in 28 (10%) cases, of which 21 (75%) were elective and 7 (25%) were emergent. Alternatives were documented the least frequently: they were documented in 23 cases (9%), of which 20 (87%) were elective and 3 (13%) were emergent. Residents performed better than attending physicians in documenting IC discussions in clinic notes and on consent forms, but not in operating room notes. Conclusion: Documentation of the elements of IC for LC was poor. Potential complications were the most frequently documented element of IC; alternatives and details were often omitted. Future studies comparing audiotaped IC conversations with the documentation of IC are warranted. The use of procedure-specific consent forms for LC may facilitate documentation.
Contexte: La recherche sur le consentement éclairé (CÉ) s'est longtemps intéressée surtout à la consignation du contenu des discussions avec les patients au sujet des complications potentielles. Nous avons voulu examiner l'exhaustivité de la consignation de tous les éléments du CÉ pour la cholécystectomie laparoscopique (CL) : complications potentielles, solutions de rechange à la CL et détails de l'intervention. Nous avons observé des différences dans la consignation des éléments du CÉ pour la CL urgente et non urgente. Méthodes: Nous avons procédé à un examen rétrospectif des dossiers de patients soumis à une CL dans notre établissement entre 2015 et 2017. La consignation au dossier était jugée complète lorsque les 3 éléments du CÉ étaient présents dans la note clinique, la note opératoire ou le formulaire de consentement lui-même. Nous avons effectué une analyse descriptive des données, et nous avons comparé la consignation des éléments pour les cas urgents et non urgents, effectuée par les résidents et les médecins traitants au moyen de tests t. Résultats: Au total, 270 patients ont été inclus dans l'analyse. Tous les éléments du CÉ étaient adéquatement consignés pour seulement 5 (2 %) d'entre eux. Les complications potentielles ont été consignées dans 232 cas (86 %), dont 58 (25 %) étaient non urgents et 174 (75 %) étaient urgents. Les détails de l'intervention ont été notés dans 28 cas (10 %), dont 21 (75 %) étaient non urgents et 7 (25 %) étaient urgents. Ce sont les solutions de rechange qui ont été le moins souvent consignées : elles ont été notées dans 23 cas (9 %), dont 20 (87 %) étaient non urgents et 3 (13 %) étaient urgents. Les résidents ont mieux fait que les médecins traitants pour ce qui est de consigner les discussions sur le CÉ dans les notes cliniques et les formulaires de CÉ, mais non dans les notes opératoires. Conclusion: La consignation des éléments du CÉ pour la CL a été faible. Les complications potentielles ont été l'élément du CÉ le plus souvent consigné au dossier; les solutions de rechange et les détails de l'intervention ont souvent été omis. Il faudra procéder à d'autres études pour comparer le contenu des discussions sur le CÉ enregistrées sur bande audio et sa consignation. L'utilisation de formulaires de CÉ spécifiques aux interventions pourrait faciliter la consignation de leurs éléments.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Consentimiento Informado , Centros Médicos Académicos , Formularios de Consentimiento , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Masculino , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Objectives. To evaluate the sensitivity of health care facility documentation of suicide deaths among US veterans with recent Veterans Health Administration (VHA) care and assess variation in identification by veteran, clinical, and suicide death characteristics. Methods. Cross-sectional analyses included 11 148 veterans who died by suicide in 2013 to 2017, per National Death Index death certificate information, with VHA encounters in the year of death or the previous year. Facility suicide ascertainment was assessed per site reports in the VHA Suicide Prevention Applications Network. Bivariate and multivariable analyses assessed ascertainment by decedent demographic, clinical, utilization, and method of suicide characteristics. Results. Site reports identified 3667 suicide decedents (32.9%). Veteran suicide decedents identified by facilities were more likely to be younger and with clinical risk factors and more recent VHA encounters. Suicide deaths involving poisoning were less likely to be identified than deaths involving other methods. Conclusions. VHA facility ascertainment of suicide deaths among recent patients was neither comprehensive nor representative. Findings will inform efforts to enhance facility suicide surveillance and veteran suicide prevention.
Asunto(s)
Certificado de Defunción , Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Importance: There is widespread concern that clinical notes have grown longer and less informative over the past decade. Addressing these concerns requires a better understanding of the magnitude, scope, and potential causes of increased note length and redundancy. Objective: To measure changes between 2009 and 2018 in the length and redundancy of outpatient progress notes across multiple medical specialties and investigate how these measures associate with author experience and method of note entry. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Oregon Health & Science University, a large academic medical center. Participants included clinicians and staff who wrote outpatient progress notes between 2009 and 2018 for a random sample of 200â¯000 patients. Statistical analysis was performed from March to August 2020. Exposures: Use of a comprehensive electronic health record to document patient care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Note length, note redundancy (ie, the proportion of text identical to the patient's last note), and percentage of templated, copied, or directly typed note text. Results: A total of 2â¯704â¯800 notes written by 6228 primary authors across 46 specialties were included in this study. Median note length increased 60.1% (99% CI, 46.7%-75.2%) from a median of 401 words (interquartile range [IQR], 225-660 words) in 2009 to 642 words (IQR, 399-1007 words) in 2018. Median note redundancy increased 10.9 percentage points (99% CI, 7.5-14.3 percentage points) from 47.9% in 2009 to 58.8% in 2018. Notes written in 2018 had a mean value of just 29.4% (99% CI, 28.2%-30.7%) directly typed text with the remaining 70.6% of text being templated or copied. Mixed-effect linear models found that notes with higher proportions of templated or copied text were significantly longer and more redundant (eg, in the 2-year model, each 1% increase in the proportion of copied or templated note text was associated with 1.5% [95% CI, 1.5%-1.5%] and 1.6% [95% CI, 1.6%-1.6%] increases in note length, respectively). Residents and fellows also wrote significantly (26.3% [95% CI, 25.8%-26.7%]) longer notes than more senior authors, as did more recent hires (1.8% for each year later [95% CI, 1.3%-2.4%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, outpatient progress notes grew longer and more redundant over time, potentially limiting their use in patient care. Interventions aimed at reducing outpatient progress note length and redundancy may need to simultaneously address multiple factors such as note template design and training for both new and established clinicians.
Asunto(s)
Documentación/normas , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Documentación/métodos , Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/instrumentación , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Oregon , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Some patients with end-stage disease who may neither want nor benefit from aggressive resuscitation receive such treatment if they cannot communicate in an emergency. Timely access to patients' current resuscitation wishes, or "code status," should be a key metric of electronic health records (EHR). We sought to determine what percentage of a cohort of patients with end-stage disease who present to the emergency department (ED) have accessible, code status documents, and for those who do, how quickly can this documentation be retrieved. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study of ED patients with end-stage disease (eg, palliative care, metastatic malignancy, home oxygen, dialysis) conducted during purposefully sampled random accrual times we performed a standardized, timed review of available health records, including accompanying transfer documents. We also interviewed consenting patients and substitute decision makers to compare available code status documents to their current wishes. RESULTS: Code status documentation was unavailable within 15 minutes of ED arrival in most cases (54/85, or 63%). Retrieval time was under five minutes in the rest, especially when "one click deep" in the EHR. When interviewed, 20/32 (63%) expressed "do not resuscitate" wishes, 10 of whom had no supporting documentation. Patients from assisted-living (odds ratio [OR] 6.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-26) and long-term care facilities (OR 13; 95% CI, 2.5-65) were more likely to have a documented code status available compared to those living in the community. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with end-stage disease, including half of those who would not wish resuscitation from cardiorespiratory arrest, did not have code status documents readily available upon arrival to our tertiary care ED. Patients living in the community with advanced disease may be at higher risk for unwanted resuscitative efforts should they present to hospital in extremis. While easily retrievable code status documentation within the EHR shows promise, its accuracy and validity remain important considerations.
Asunto(s)
Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Órdenes de Resucitación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/provisión & distribución , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Cuidado Terminal/normasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of medication discrepancies in transition points of care of hospitalised children. DESIGN: A prospective observational multicentre study was carried out between February and August 2019. Data collection consisted of the following steps: sociodemographic data collection, clinical interview with the patient's caregiver, review of patient prescriptions and evaluation of medical records. Medication discrepancies were classified as intentional (documented or undocumented) and unintentional. In addition, discrepancies identified were categorised according to the medication discrepancy taxonomy. Unintentional discrepancies were assessed for potential clinical harm to the patient. SETTING: Paediatric clinics of four teaching hospitals in Brazil. PATIENTS: Children aged 1 month-12 years. FINDINGS: A total of 248 children were included, 77.0% (n=191) patients had at least one intentional discrepancy; 20.2% (n=50) patients had at least one unintended discrepancy and 15.3% (n=38) patients had at least one intentional discrepancy and an unintentional one. The reason for the intentional discrepancy was not documented in 49.6% (n=476) of the cases. The most frequent unintentional discrepancy was medication omission (54.1%; n=66). Low potential to cause discomfort was found in 53 (43.4%) unintentional discrepancies, while 55 (45.1%) had the potential to cause moderate discomfort and 14 (11.5%) could potentially cause severe discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Although most medication discrepancies were intentional, the majority of these were not documented by the healthcare professionals. Unintentional discrepancies were often related to medication omission and had a potential risk of causing harm to hospitalised children.