[Diagnosing neuropathic orofacial pain in the general dental practice]. / Diagnosticeren van neuropathische orofaciale pijn in de algemene tandartspraktijk.

Dental pain is a common reason for patients to visit the dentist. This type of pain is usually easy to diagnose and treat. However, diagnosing and treating other forms of orofacial pain remains complicated. One of the most challenging types of orofacial pain to diagnose and treat is neuropathic orofacial pain: pain resulting from damage to nerve tissue. Recognizing this type of pain in a timely manner can prevent unnecessary invasive dental treatments and disappointment for patients who seek help for this type of pain. There are relatively simple tools for dentists to distinguish neuropathic pain from other types of orofacial pain. The treatment of neuropathic pain is primarily focused on symptom relief through medication.

Temporomandibular Disorders in Relation to Mandibular Advancement Devices for Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) keep the upper airways patent by holding the mandible and attached soft tissues forward via altered position of its condyles relative to the articulating surfaces of the temporal bones. During the first weeks of MAD therapy, pain may occur in the area of the temporomandibular joints, masticatory muscles, and/or teeth with a tendency of spontaneous resolution. In patients reporting temporomandibular disorder (TMD) symptoms prior to therapy, the MAD-related anterior condylar position during sleep may result in a reduction of TMD signs and symptoms.

Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders.

How to cite this article: Mosaddad SA. Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(3):197-198. Keywords: Arthroscopy, Facial pain, Temporomandibular joint, Temporomandibular joint disorders.

Severe facial pain and removal of maxillary sinus mucous retention cyst.

Maxillary sinus retention cysts (MRCs) are typically asymptomatic and require no treatment. An early 30s man presented with a decade-long history of severe left-sided chronic facial pain (CFP). Multiple prior treatments resulted in an edentulous patient with persistent pain. Imaging revealed a dome-shaped radiopaque change in the left maxillary sinus. History and clinical examination suggested persistent idiopathic facial pain, and doubts about the outcome of a surgical intervention were explained to the patient. Surgical removal of the MRC via lateral antrotomy led to complete symptom resolution of CFP. This case substantiates the importance of considering MRCs as a possible cause of CFP. It also emphasises the need for a systematic multidisciplinary approach in cases of unexplained CFP.

Could painful temporomandibular disorders be nociplastic in nature? A critical review and new proposal.

Classification of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and, indeed, all types of orofacial pains has significantly progressed in the last decade based on international consensus work and operationalized clustering of signs and symptoms. A challenging gap nevertheless continues to exist in terms of understanding the underlying pain mechanisms and link to management. Recently, a novel mechanistic descriptor 'nociplastic pain' was introduced, and diagnostic algorithms and characteristic features were proposed. This narrative and critical review aim to discuss to what extent could painful TMD conditions fit into this category. Moreover, a number of less common types of orofacial pain could possibly also reflect nociplastic pain mechanisms. A model to differentiate TMD pain mechanisms is proposed, and the implications for management are discussed. The purpose of this review is to stimulate original and novel research into mechanisms of orofacial pain and hopefully thereby improve management of the individual patient.

[Temporomandibular dysfunction and bruxism in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis and at-risk patients: a cross-sectional study]. / Temporomandibulaire disfunctie en bruxisme bij patiënten met vroege reumatoïde artritis en risicopatiënten: een cross-sectioneel onderzoek.

What is the prevalence of temporomandibular dysfunction in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis and individuals at risk of rheumatoid arthritis? 3 groups (of 50 participants each) were examined for a possible TMD diagnosis: 1. patients with early rheumatoid arthritis, 2. at-risk individuals, and 3. healthy controls. A possible association with bruxism, determined on the basis of self-reporting and clinical features, was also examined. At-risk patients had a higher prevalence of TMD pain diagnoses compared to healthy controls (p = 0.046). Within the early rheumatoid arthritis group, seronegative patients had a higher prevalence of TMD pain diagnoses than seropositive patients (p = 0.048). No further differences in the prevalence of TMD diagnoses were found between the groups. Participants with a TMD pain diagnosis were more often diagnosed with probable sleep bruxism than those without a TMD pain diagnosis. The prevalence of TMD pain is increased in individuals at risk of rheumatoid arthritis and seronegative early rheumatoid arthritis patients, and is associated with signs of bruxism.

Other Secondary Headaches: Odontogenic Pain and Other Painful Orofacial Conditions.

This article discusses extremely common odontogenic pain conditions, which may occasionally present to the neurology clinic mimicking headache, and other uncommon orofacial pain conditions, which may do the same. Typical presentations, investigative strategies, and management are discussed, as well as highlighting key diagnostic criteria and the importance of involving oral or dental specialists where diagnostic uncertainty exists.

Analysis of risk factors and interactions for pain in temporomandibular disorder: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify risk factors for TMD pain using a biopsychosocial model and to investigate interactions between potential risk factors-oral behaviours (OBs), psychological factors and sleep quality-and their direct and indirect effects on TMD pain. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 488 patients with TMDs (422 women; 30.8 ± 9.4 years). Pain was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale. Demographic, behavioural, psychological and biomedical data were collected through clinical examination, face-to-face interviews and questionnaires. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with TMD pain. Mediation and moderation analysis were used to evaluate interactions between variables. Significant mediation ('0' not included in the 95% confidence interval (CI)) and moderation (p < .05) effects on TMD pain were identified. RESULTS: Marital status, diagnosis subgroup, previous medication use, depression and sleep quality were significant risk factors for TMD pain (p < .05). Significant mediation effects were observed as follows: depression and sleep quality mediated the association between OBs and pain; sleep quality mediated the association between somatization, depression, anxiety and pain; and depression mediated the association between sleep quality and pain (all 95% CI did not contain '0'). CONCLUSIONS: (1) Marital status, diagnosis subgroup, previous medication use, depression and sleep quality were associated with TMD pain. (2) OBs can exacerbate pain by promoting depression and reducing sleep quality. Psychological factors and sleep quality can interact to exacerbate pain.

Accuracy of temporomandibular disorders diagnosis evaluated through the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorder (DC/TDM) Axis II compared to the Axis I evaluations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a complex joint that facilitates mandibular movements during speech, chewing, and swallowing activities. The Axis I evaluation of the DC/TMD focuses on assessing physical diagnoses related to TMDs. It includes an assessment of pain and functional limitations, such as jaw opening range, joint sounds, and joint tenderness. The Axis II evaluation of the DC/TMD provides information on the patient's psychological status and quality of life. This Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy of Temporomandibular Disorders diagnosis considered through the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorder (DC/TDM) axis II compared to the Axis I evaluations. METHODS: A search was made in PubMed, Web of Science and Lilacs for articles published from the inception until 20 January 2023. We applied the Population, Exposure, Comparator, and Outcomes (PECO) model [1] to assess document eligibility. Only studies that evaluated patients by DC/TMD Axis I and Axis II were considered. Review Manager version 5.2.8 (Cochrane Collaboration) was used for the pooled analysis. We measured the odds ratio (OR) between the two groups (Axis I and Axis II). RESULTS: Fifty-one articles were selected because of the search. Four papers were excluded before the screening: 2 pieces were not in English, and two were reviewed. The remaining 47 articles were selected for the title and abstract screening to evaluate whether they met the PECO criteria. Among these, four papers were established; the overall effect showed that there was no difference in TMD diagnosis between Axis I and Axis II (RR 1.17; 95% CI: 0.80- 1.71; Z:0.82; P = .41), suggesting that there is no difference between Axis I and Axis II. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, DC/TMD is an effective tool for the diagnosis of TMD. It improves the accuracy of TMD diagnosis, allows for the classification of subtypes, and assesses psychosocial factors that may impact the development or maintenance of TMD symptoms.

Is painful temporomandibular disorder a real headache for many patients?

Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and primary headaches are common pain conditions and often co-exist. TMD classification includes the term 'headache secondary to TMD' but this term does not acknowledge the likelihood that primary headache pathophysiology underpins headache causing painful TMD signs and symptoms in many patients. The two disorders have a complex link and we do not fully understand their interrelationship. However, growing evidence shows a significant association between the two disorders. This article reviews the possible connection between temporomandibular disorders and primary headaches, specifically migraine, both anatomically and pathogenetically.

Treatment of painful temporomandibular joint disc displacement without reduction: network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

There is currently no consensus on the best treatment for painful temporomandibular disc displacement without reduction (DDwoR), and no network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing all types of treatments for this condition has been conducted. The objective of this study was to compare and rank all treatments for DDwoR, including conservative treatments, occlusal splints, low-level laser therapy (LLLT), arthrocentesis (Arthro) alone, Arthro plus intra-articular injection (IAI) of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), Arthro plus IAI of hyaluronic acid (HA), Arthro with exercises, Arthro plus occlusal splints, and manipulative therapy. Outcome variables were pain intensity on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and maximum mouth opening (MMO, mm). The mean difference with 95% confidence interval was estimated using Stata software. The GRADE system was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. A total of 742 patients from 16 RCTs were included in the NMA. Both direct meta-analysis and NMA showed that Arthro with IAI of co-adjuvants provided better pain reduction in the short term (≤3 months) than Arthro alone. However, the quality of the evidence was very low. In the intermediate term, Arthro alone or combined with co-adjuvants provided better pain reduction than conservative treatment, but with low-quality evidence. Conservative treatment significantly increased MMO in the short term compared to other treatments. In conclusion, the results of this NMA suggest that arthrocentesis with intra-articular injection of adjuvant medications may be superior to conservative treatments in reducing pain intensity at long-term follow-up, while no significant differences were found for the MMO outcome. However, the quality of evidence was generally low to very low, and further RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

Development of the 12-Item Facial Complaints Evaluation Scale (FaCES-12).

OBJECTIVES: Chronic rhinosinusitis and related rhinologic disorders are common in routine otolaryngologic practice. Common presenting symptoms include nasal obstruction, facial pain, facial pressure, headache, and a subjective feeling of the face feeling "swollen," a perceptual distortion. No validated scale exists to assess facial pain in addition to perceptual distortion or headache. The objective was to develop a novel scale for assessment of facial symptoms experienced by patients presenting for rhinologic evaluation. METHODS: This was a prospective validation cross-sectional study. A patient questionnaire, the 12-item Facial Complaints Evaluation Scale (FaCES-12), was created to evaluate facial symptoms based on clinical experience and the literature, including severity and timing of facial pain, facial pressure, facial perceptual swelling, and headache. Each item was assessed utilizing an 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 10 in severity. Data was collected prospectively from 210 patients in 1 private and 2 academic otolaryngologic practices from August to December 2019 along with the PROMIS Pain Intensity Scale 3a and 22-Item Sino-nasal Outcome Test. Construct validity was determined using Pearson correlation and exploratory factor analysis. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha and assessing test-retest scores. RESULTS: A new 12-item scale named FaCES-12 was developed. FaCES-12 demonstrated high reliability with a Cronbach's alpha of .94 and high test-retest reliability (r = .90). The scale revealed very strong correlation with the PROMIS Pain Intensity Scale 3a (r = .81) and moderate correlation with the Sino-nasal Outcome Test (r = .48). Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated the scale contained interrelated variables that measured unique components of facial sensations. CONCLUSION: The FaCES-12 is a valid and reliable instrument for use in the evaluation of facial symptoms. Further research into the application of this scale is warranted.

[Specificities of orofacial neuropathic pain]. / Spécificités de la douleur neuropathique oro-faciale.

Head pain and notably orofacial pain differs from spinal pain on pathophysiological, clinical, therapeutic and prognostic levels. Its high prevalence, important impact on quality of life and significant socio-economical burden justify specific study of such type of pain. Among them, neuropathic orofacial pain resulting from disease or trauma of the trigeminal nervous system is among the most difficult types of pain to diagnose and to treat. Deciphering of underlying peripheral and central mechanisms has allowed numerous conceptual, clinical and therapeutic advances, notably the role of neural and non neural cell types, such as glia, immunocytes, vascular endothelial cells or the role of trigeminal sensory complex neural circuitry reconfiguration in the development of post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain. Cellular interactions within the trigeminal ganglion, allowing a better understanding of several painful dental, ocular or cephalalgic comorbidities, are also described.

Title: Spécificités de la douleur neuropathique oro-faciale. Abstract: Les douleurs de la région céphalique ­ et notamment les douleurs oro-faciales ­ diffèrent des douleurs spinales sur les plans physiopathologique, clinique, thérapeutique et pronostique. Leur prévalence élevée, leur fort retentissement sur la qualité de vie individuelle et leur impact économique et sociétal important justifient une étude spécifique. Parmi ces douleurs, les douleurs neuropathiques, résultant d'une maladie ou d'un traumatisme du système nerveux trigéminal, sont parmi les plus difficiles à diagnostiquer et à soigner. L'étude des mécanismes neurobiologiques, périphériques et centraux les sous-tendant a permis de nombreuses avancées conceptuelles, cliniques et thérapeutiques, avec, par exemple, la mise en évidence du rôle des cellules nerveuses et non nerveuses, telles que la glie, les immunocytes, les cellules endothéliales vasculaires ou le rôle de la reconfiguration de la circuiterie nerveuse au niveau du complexe sensitif trigéminal, dans la genèse des douleurs neuropathiques post-lésionnelles. Les interactions cellulaires au sein du ganglion trigéminal, susceptibles d'éclairer la compréhension de certaines comorbidités douloureuses dentaires, oculaires ou céphalalgiques, sont également décrites.

Trigeminal neuralgia and trigeminal neuropathic pain.

It is very important that the dental team are aware of the varied presentations of pain in the mouth, face and other parts of the trigeminal region which are not directly caused by teeth or oral structures. Our understanding of underlying causes in this complex area is evolving. Ultimately, patients who present with what may at first seem to be oral or dental problems will require specialist input in secondary care with potential for use of systemic medications. This article reviews the common non-dental pains encountered in the orofacial region related to dysfunction of the trigeminal nerve.

Temporal artery ultrasonography for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: a case report.

Orofacial pain is a worldwide pain problem, with many patients unable to find appropriate diagnosis and treatment. Orofacial pain includes pain arising from the odontogenic and nonodontogenic structures in the head and neck region. Dental clinicians need to have a thorough knowledge and skill to diagnose, manage, and treat patients with odontogenic pain or refer patients for treatment of nonodontogenic pain to specialists such as orofacial pain specialists, neurologists, otolaryngologists, and rheumatologists. More often, dental practitioners diagnose patients with a temporomandibular disorder (TMD), and when treatment is ineffective, term it "atypical facial pain." The first requirement for effective treatment is an accurate diagnosis. Dental clinicians must be aware of giant cell arteritis (GCA), a chronic large-vessel vasculitis, primarily affecting adults over the age of 50 years, as it frequently mimics and is misdiagnosed as TMD. GCA is associated with loss of vision, and stroke and can be a life-threatening disorder. Therefore, diagnostic testing for GCA and differential diagnosis should be common knowledge in the armamentarium of all dental clinicians. Historically, temporal artery biopsy was considered the definitive diagnostic test for GCA. Temporal artery ultrasound (TAUSG), a safe and noninvasive imaging modality, has replaced the previous diagnostic gold standard for GCA, the temporal artery biopsy, owing to its enhanced diagnostic capabilities and safety profile. The present case report describes a patient with GCA, and the role TAUSG played in the diagnosis. Case report: A 72-year-old woman presented with left-sided facial pain, jaw claudication, dysesthesia of the tongue, and episodic loss of vision of 2 years' duration. She was diagnosed with and treated for a myriad of dental conditions including endodontia and temporomandibular joint therapy with no benefit. A thorough history and physical examination, combined with serologic analysis, led to the diagnosis of GCA and TAUSG, which confirmed the diagnosis. Conclusion: This report underscores the responsibility of differential diagnosis and early recognition of GCA facilitated by TAUSG in optimizing treatment outcomes as a viable, noninvasive diagnostic tool. (Quintessence Int 2024;55:336-343; doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b4938419).

Headaches and facial pain attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim was to provide insights to the characteristics of headache in the context of COVID-19 on behalf of the Headache Scientific Panel and the Neuro-COVID-19 Task Force of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and the European Headache Federation (EHF). METHODS: Following the Delphi method the Task Force identified six relevant questions and then conducted a systematic literature review to provide evidence-based answers and suggest specific diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: No data for facial pain were identified in the literature search. (1) Headache incidence during acute COVID-19 varies considerably, with higher prevalence rates in prospective compared to retrospective studies (28.9%-74.6% vs. 6.5%-34.0%). (2) Acute COVID-19 headache is usually bilateral or holocranial and often moderate to severe with throbbing pain quality lasting 2-14 days after first signs of COVID-19; photo-phonophobia, nausea, anosmia and ageusia are common associated features; persistent headache shares similar clinical characteristics. (3) Acute COVID-19 headache is presumably caused by immune-mediated mechanisms that activate the trigeminovascular system. (4) Headache occurs in 13.3%-76.9% following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and occurs more often amongst women with a pre-existing primary headache; the risk of developing headache is higher with the adenoviral-vector-type vaccines than with other preparations. (5) Headache related to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is mostly bilateral, and throbbing, pressing, jolting or stabbing. (6) No studies have been conducted investigating the underlying mechanism of headache attributed to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. CONCLUSION: The results of this joint EAN/EHF initiative provide a framework for a better understanding of headache in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination.

Diagnostic Accuracy of a Temporomandibular Disorder Pain Screener in Patients Seeking Endodontic Treatment for Tooth Pain.

INTRODUCTION: This study assessed the accuracy of a TMD Pain Screener questionnaire in identifying patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain among those seeking endodontic treatment for tooth pain. It also investigated whether the screener accuracy could be improved by adding questions regarding putative predictors of TMD status. METHODS: One hundred patients seeking endodontic treatment for tooth pain were enrolled. Participants completed the 6-question TMD Pain Screener before treatment. A board-certified orofacial pain specialist/endodontic resident conducted endodontic and TMD examinations using validated Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD). The sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and positive/negative predictive values (PPVs/NPVs) were calculated for the 6-question and 3-question versions of the TMD Pain Screener. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analyses were performed to determine the screening accuracy. RESULTS: At the screening threshold of ≥3, TMD Pain Screener's sensitivity was 0.85, specificity 0.52, PPV 0.68, and NPV 0.75 for the 6-question version and 0.64, 0.65, 0.69, and 0.61, respectively, for the 3-question version. The AUROC was 0.71 (95% CL: 0.61, 0.82) and 0.60 (95% CL: 0.48, 0.71) for full and short versions, respectively. Adding a rating of current pain intensity of the chief complaint to the screener improved the AUROC to 0.81 (95% CL: 0.72, 0.89) and 0.77 (95% CL: 0.67, 0.86) for full and short versions, respectively, signifying useful overall accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The 6-question TMD Pain Screener, combined with the patient's rating of current pain intensity of the chief complaint, could be recommended for use in endodontic patients with tooth pain for detecting painful TMD.

Self-reported bruxism in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to investigate the association between self-reported awake/sleep bruxism, and orofacial pain with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). METHODS: A case-control study with a convenience sample was designed. Participants were recruited from a university-based Trauma Ambulatory. The diagnosis of PTSD was established through a clinical interview and the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID-I/P). Thirty-eight PTSD patients and 38 controls completed the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis-II to categorize awake/sleep bruxism and orofacial pain. Following this, we performed a short clinical examination of the temporomandibular joint and extraoral muscles. RESULTS: Adjusted logistic regression analysis showed that awake bruxism was associated with PTSD (OR = 3.38, 95% CI = 1.01-11.27, p = 0.047). Sleep bruxism was not associated with any covariate included in the model. In a Poisson regression model, PTSD (IRR = 3.01, 95% CI = 1.38-6.55, p = 0.005) and the muscle pain/discomfort (IRR = 5.12, 95% CI = 2.80-9.36, p < 0.001) were significant predictors for current orofacial pain. CONCLUSIONS: PTSD was associated with self-reported awake bruxism and low-intensity orofacial pain. These conditions were frequent outcomes in patients previously exposed to traumatic events. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We suggest including a two-question screening for bruxism in psychiatry/psychology interviews to improve under-identification and to prevent harmful consequences at the orofacial level.