Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.552
Filtrar
2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 45: 578-589, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33402309

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) care coordination plays an important role in facilitating care transitions across settings. We studied ED care coordination processes and their perceived effectiveness in Maryland (MD) hospitals, which face strong incentives to reduce hospital-based care through global budgets. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews to examine ED care coordination processes and perceptions of effectiveness. Interviews were conducted from January through October 2019 across MD hospital-based EDs. Results were reviewed to assign analytic domains and identify emerging themes. Descriptive statistics of ED care coordination staffing and processes were also calculated. RESULTS: A total of 25 in-depth interviews across 18 different EDs were conducted with ED physician leadership (n = 14) and care coordination staff (CCS) (n = 11). Across all EDs, there was significant variation in the hours and types of CCS coverage and the number of initiatives implemented to improve care coordination. Participants perceived ED care coordination as effective in facilitating safer discharges and addressing social determinants of health; however, adequate access to outpatient providers was a significant barrier. The majority of ED physician leaders perceived MD's policy reform as having a mixed impact, with improved care transitions and overall patient care as benefits, but increased physician workloads and worsened ED throughput as negative effects. CONCLUSIONS: EDs have responded to the value-based care incentives of MD's global budgeting program with investments to enhance care coordination staffing and a variety of initiatives targeting specific patient populations. Although the observed care coordination initiatives were broadly perceived to produce positive results, MD's global budgeting policies were also perceived to produce barriers to optimizing ED care. Further research is needed to determine the association of the various strategies to improve ED care coordination with patient outcomes to inform practice leaders and policymakers on the efficacy of the various approaches.


Asunto(s)
Economía Hospitalaria/tendencias , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Maryland , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Investigación Cualitativa
3.
PLoS One ; 15(10): e0240830, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33079967

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial use is associated with emergence of antimicrobial resistance. We report hospital antimicrobial procurement, as a surrogate for consumption in humans, expenditure and prices in public hospitals in Vietnam, a lower middle-income country with a high burden of drug resistant infections. METHOD: Data on antimicrobial procurement were obtained from tender-winning bids from provincial health authorities and public hospitals with detailed bids representing 28.7% (1.68 / 5.85 billion US $) of total hospital medication spend in Vietnam. Antimicrobials were classified using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Index and the 2019 WHO Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe) groups. Volume was measured in number of Defined Daily Doses (DDD). Antimicrobial prices were presented per DDD. RESULTS: Expenditure on systemic antibacterials and antifungals accounted for 28.6% (US $482.6 million/US $1.68 billion) of the total drug bids. 83% of antibacterials (572,698,014 DDDs) by volume (accounting for 45.5% of the antibacterials spend) were domestically supplied. Overall, the most procured antibacterials by DDD were second generation cephalosporins, combinations of penicillins and beta-lactamase inhibitors, and penicillins with extended spectrum. For parenteral antibacterials this was third generation cephalosporins. The average price for antibacterials was US $15.6, US $0.86, US $0.4 and US $11.7 per DDD for Reserve, Watch, Access and non-recommended/unclassified group antibacterials, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobials accounted for a substantial proportion of the funds spent for medication in public hospitals in Vietnam. The pattern of antibacterial consumption was similar to other countries. The high prices of Reserve group and non-recommended/unclassified antibacterials suggests a need for a combination of national pricing and antimicrobial stewardship policies to ensure appropriate accessibility.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/economía , Antiinfecciosos/provisión & distribución , Hospitales/tendencias , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/métodos , Economía Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitales/provisión & distribución , Hospitales Públicos/economía , Hospitales Públicos/tendencias , Humanos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Vietnam
5.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 77(15): 1213-1230, 2020 07 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32412055

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report historical patterns of pharmaceutical expenditures, to identify factors that may influence future spending, and to predict growth in drug spending in 2020 in the United States, with a focus on the nonfederal hospital and clinic sectors. METHODS: Historical patterns were assessed by examining data on drug purchases from manufacturers using the IQVIA National Sales Perspectives database. Factors that may influence drug spending in hospitals and clinics in 2020 were reviewed, including new drug approvals, patent expirations, and potential new policies or legislation. Focused analyses were conducted for specialty drugs, biosimilars, and diabetes medications. For nonfederal hospitals, clinics, and overall (all sectors), estimates of growth of pharmaceutical expenditures in 2020 were based on a combination of quantitative analyses and expert opinion. RESULTS: In 2019, overall US pharmaceutical expenditures grew 5.4% compared to 2018, for a total of $507.9 billion. This increase was driven to similar degrees by prices, utilization, and new drugs. Adalimumab was the top drug in US expenditures in 2019, followed by apixaban and insulin glargine. Drug expenditures were $36.9 billion (a 1.5% increase from 2018) and $90.3 billion (an 11.8% increase from 2018) in nonfederal hospitals and clinics, respectively. In clinics, growth was driven by new products and increased utilization, whereas in hospitals growth was driven by new products and price increases. Several new drugs that will likely influence spending are expected to be approved in 2020. Specialty and cancer drugs will continue to drive expenditures. CONCLUSION: For 2020 we expect overall prescription drug spending to rise by 4.0% to 6.0%, whereas in clinics and hospitals we anticipate increases of 9.0% to 11.0% and 2.0% to 4.0%, respectively, compared to 2019. These national estimates of future pharmaceutical expenditure growth may not be representative of any particular health system because of the myriad of local factors that influence actual spending.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/tendencias , Costos de los Medicamentos/tendencias , Economía Hospitalaria/tendencias , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/economía , Bases de Datos Factuales/tendencias , Humanos , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos
6.
Am J Emerg Med ; 38(12): 2511-2515, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31862191

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is important that policy makers, emergency physicians, hospital administrators, and health system planners understand the expanded role of hospital emergency departments (EDs). OBJECTIVES: We sought to document the expanded role hospital EDs and their economic impact on overall hospital activity between 2002 and 2017. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of hospital ED capacity, utilization, and financial data from all general acute care hospitals in California (2002 through 2017). We calculate changes in ED capacity, annual ED visits and admissions through the ED, and the share of total hospital charges associated with ED generated utilization. RESULTS: EDs now account for well over half of all inpatient admissions to the hospital and ED outpatient visit volume has also grown substantially over time. By 2017 EDs within California's general acute care hospitals generated 67% of the total hospital economic activity (as measured by charges), up from 40% in 2002. CONCLUSION: Overall, our data reveal that EDs are now the economic engine of hospitals and play a much larger role in the overall health care system, suggesting many unexplored policy, manpower, market, and health system design implications for further research.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Precios de Hospital/tendencias , California , Economía Hospitalaria/tendencias , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos
7.
Inquiry ; 56: 46958019860386, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31282282

RESUMEN

This longitudinal study examines whether readmission rates, made transparent through Hospital Compare, affect hospital financial performance by examining 98 hospitals in the State of Washington from 2012 to 2014. Readmission rates for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), pneumonia (PN), and heart failure (HF) were examined against operating revenues per patient, operating expenses per patient, and operating margin. Using hospital-level fixed effects regression on 276 hospital year observations, the analysis indicated that a reduction in AMI readmission rates is related with increased operating revenues as expenses associated with costly treatments related with unnecessary readmissions are avoided. Additionally, reducing readmission rates is related with an increase in operating expenses. As a net effect, increased PN readmission rates may show marginal increase in operating margin because of the higher operating revenues due to readmissions. However, as readmissions continue to happen, a gradual increase in expenses due to greater use of resources may lead to decreased profitability.


Asunto(s)
Economía Hospitalaria , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Economía Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Economía Hospitalaria/tendencias , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Hospitales , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Medicare , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Neumonía/epidemiología , Estados Unidos , Washingtón
8.
BMC Nephrol ; 20(1): 190, 2019 05 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31138156

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant (KT) patients presenting with cardiovascular (CVD) events are being managed increasingly in non-transplant facilities. We aimed to identify drivers of mortality and costs, including transplant hospital status. METHODS: Data from the 2009-2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, the American Hospital Association, and Hospital Compare were used to evaluate post-KT patients hospitalized for MI, CHF, stroke, cardiac arrest, dysrhythmia, and malignant hypertension. We used generalized estimating equations to identify clinical, structural, and process factors associated with risk-adjusted mortality and high cost hospitalization (HCH). RESULTS: Data on 7803 admissions were abstracted from 275 hospitals. Transplant hospitals had lower crude mortality (3.0% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.06), and higher un-adjusted total episodic costs (Median $33,271 vs. $28,022, p < 0.0001). After risk-adjusting for clinical, structural, and process factors, mortality predictors included: age, CVD burden, CV destination hospital, diagnostic cardiac catheterization without intervention (all, p < 0.001). Female sex, race, documented co-morbidities, and hospital teaching status were protective (all, p < 0.05). Transplant and non-transplant hospitals had similar risk-adjusted mortality. HCH was associated with: age, CVD burden, CV procedures, and staffing patterns. Hospitalizations at transplant facilities had 37% lower risk-adjusted odds of HCH. Cardiovascular process measures were not associated with adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: KT patients presenting with CVD events had similar risk-adjusted mortality at transplant and non-transplant hospitals, but high cost care was less likely in transplant hospitals. Transplant hospitals may provide better value in cardiovascular care for transplant patients. These data have significant implications for patients, transplant and non-transplant providers, and payers.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Hospitales/tendencias , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Trasplante de Riñón/tendencias , Alta del Paciente/tendencias , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/tendencias , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Bases de Datos Factuales/economía , Bases de Datos Factuales/tendencias , Economía Hospitalaria/tendencias , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/economía , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente/economía , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 38(1): 36-43, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30615522

RESUMEN

Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) has been credited with lowering risk-adjusted readmission rates for targeted conditions at general acute care hospitals. However, these reductions appear to be illusory or overstated. This is because a concurrent change in electronic transaction standards allowed hospitals to document a larger number of diagnoses per claim, which had the effect of reducing risk-adjusted patient readmission rates. Prior studies of the HRRP relied upon control groups' having lower baseline readmission rates, which could falsely create the appearance that readmission rates are changing more in the treatment than in the control group. Accounting for the revised standards reduced the decline in risk-adjusted readmission rates for targeted conditions by 48 percent. After further adjusting for differences in pre-HRRP readmission rates across samples, we found that declines for targeted conditions at general acute care hospitals were statistically indistinguishable from declines in two control samples. Either the HRRP had no effect on readmissions, or it led to a systemwide reduction in readmissions that was roughly half as large as prior estimates have suggested.


Asunto(s)
Codificación Clínica/normas , Economía Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Codificación Clínica/métodos , Economía Hospitalaria/tendencias , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales , Humanos , Estados Unidos
10.
Urology ; 115: 96-101, 2018 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29545049

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine how Medicare reimbursement for prostate biopsies was allocated to physicians, ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), and hospitals from 2012 to 2015. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data (2012-2015), we assessed provider payments to physicians and ASCs for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies (Current Procedural Terminology 55700, 76842, 76972) for fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries. Data were aggregated at provider-level for those reporting >10 biopsies per year. Hospital payments were estimated based on Outpatient Prospective Payment System. We report average and total payments for physicians, hospitals, and ASCs. RESULTS: We identified 534,807 prostate biopsies, of which 13.3% and 14.8% were associated with an ASC and hospital, respectively. Payments for all biopsies totaled $276.7 million ($152.7 million to physicians; $35.1 million to ASCs, $88.9 million to hospitals). From 2012 through 2015, physician payments for biopsies declined by $19 million (Δ=-43.2%, P = .06 for trend). Payments to ASCs (+$3.2 million, Δ = 38.8%, P = .29) and hospitals (+$11.1 million, Δ = 58.6%, P = .16) both increased. The decline in physician payments was due to a 13.7% decline in volume and lower median reimbursement for office-based procedures ($415 to $277, P = .04). The share of biopsies performed at facilities increased from 26.5% to 30.0%, and the proportion of payments associated with those settings also increased from 42.7% to 65.3%. CONCLUSION: Over time, a greater share of Medicare payments for biopsies has been directed toward facilities instead of physicians. Understanding the relationship between these trends and cancer screening and Medicare payment policies will be crucial in the future.


Asunto(s)
Economía Hospitalaria/tendencias , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/tendencias , Medicare/tendencias , Médicos/tendencias , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Centros Quirúrgicos/tendencias , Biopsia/economía , Economía Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/economía , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Centros Quirúrgicos/economía , Centros Quirúrgicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
11.
Anesth Analg ; 125(6): 2141-2145, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28961563

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We examined type I and II error rates for analysis of (1) mean hospital length of stay (LOS) versus (2) percentage of hospital LOS that are overnight. These 2 end points are suitable for when LOS is treated as a secondary economic end point. METHODS: We repeatedly resampled LOS for 5052 discharges of thoracoscopic wedge resections and lung lobectomy at 26 hospitals. RESULTS: Unequal variances t test (Welch method) and Fisher exact test both were conservative (ie, type I error rate less than nominal level). The Wilcoxon rank sum test was included as a comparator; the type I error rates did not differ from the nominal level of 0.05 or 0.01. Fisher exact test was more powerful than the unequal variances t test at detecting differences among hospitals; estimated odds ratio for obtaining P < .05 with Fisher exact test versus unequal variances t test = 1.94, with 95% confidence interval, 1.31-3.01. Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney had comparable statistical power in terms of differentiating LOS between hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: For studies with LOS to be used as a secondary end point of economic interest, there is currently considerable interest in the planned analysis being for the percentage of patients suitable for ambulatory surgery (ie, hospital LOS equals 0 or 1 midnight). Our results show that there need not be a loss of statistical power when groups are compared using this binary end point, as compared with either Welch method or Wilcoxon rank sum test.


Asunto(s)
Economía Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Método de Montecarlo , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales/tendencias , Economía Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/tendencias , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/tendencias
12.
Ann Pharm Fr ; 75(6): 480-488, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28818320

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The economic impact of therapeutic innovations on the hospital patient management cannot be easily estimated. The objective of this study is to illustrate the use of a Delphi survey as a support tool to identify the changes following the use of idarucizumab in dabigatran-treated patients with uncontrolled/life-threatening bleeding or who required emergency surgery/urgent procedures. METHODS: The Delphi questionnaires have been administrated to 8 emergency physicians or anesthetists from 6 different hospital centers. Following the answers, an economic valorization has been carried out on every parameter on which a consensus was reached (at least 4 answers showing an identical trend). A mean management cost for each etiology with and without the use of idarucizumab has thus been identified. RESULTS: For gastro-intestinal and other life-threatening bleedings (excepted intracranial bleedings), the total management cost of the hospital stay was respectively 6058 € (-35%) and 6219 € (-34%) following the use of the reversal agent. The hospital management cost for intracranial bleeding is slightly increasing to 9790 € (+3%). The cost of a stay for emergency surgery decreases to 6962€ (-2%). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a positive economic impact following the use of the dabigatran-specific reversal agent for patients with uncontrolled/life-threatening bleeding excepted in the case of intracranial bleeding. Moreover, it points out that a Delphi survey is an easy way to predict the hospital economic impact of a therapeutic innovation when no other evaluation is possible.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Antitrombinas/farmacología , Dabigatrán/antagonistas & inhibidores , Economía Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hemorragia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia/economía , Antitrombinas/economía , Dabigatrán/economía , Dabigatrán/farmacología , Técnica Delphi , Costos de los Medicamentos , Francia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/economía , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
13.
Healthc (Amst) ; 5(1-2): 1-5, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28668197

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that integrating supply chain with clinical communities would allow for clinician-led supply cost reduction and improved value in an academic health system. METHODS: Three clinical communities (spine, joint, blood management) and one clinical community-like physician led team of surgeon stakeholders partnered with the supply chain team on specific supply cost initiatives. The teams reviewed their specific utilization and cost data, and the physicians led consensus-building conversations over a series of team meetings to agree to standard supply utilization. RESULTS: The spine and joint clinical communities each agreed upon a vendor capping model that led to cost savings of $3 million dollars and $1.5 million dollars respectively. The blood management decreased blood product utilization and achieved $1.2 million dollars savings. $5.6 million dollars in savings was achieved by a clinical community-like group of surgeon stakeholders through standardization of sutures and endomechanicals. CONCLUSIONS: Physician led clinical teams empowered to lead change achieved substantial supply chain cost savings in an academic health system. The model of combining clinical communities with supply chain offers hope for an effective, practical, and scalable approach to improving value and engaging physicians in other academic health systems. IMPLICATIONS: This clinician led model could benefit both private and academic health systems engaging in value optimization efforts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.


Asunto(s)
Redes Comunitarias/economía , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Economía Hospitalaria/tendencias , Equipos y Suministros de Hospitales/economía , Conducta Cooperativa , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Atención a la Salud/normas , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Quirófanos/economía , Estados Unidos
14.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 74(14): 1076-1083, 2017 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28522642

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Overall and specific class trends in systemic antifungal expenditures in various U.S. healthcare settings from 2005 through 2015 were evaluated. METHODS: Systemic antifungal expenditures from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2015, were obtained from the QuintilesIMS National Sales Perspective database, which provides a statistically valid projection of medication purchases from multiple markets throughout the United States. Summary data for total antifungal expenditures over the entire period are reported, as are growth and the percentage change in expenditures from one year to the next. Expenditures were also assessed specifically by year, class, and healthcare setting. Expenditure trends over the study period were assessed using simple linear trend regression models. RESULTS: Overall expenditures for the 11-year period were $9.37 billion. The greatest proportion of expenditures occurred in nonfederal hospitals (47.2%) and for triazoles (57.6%). From 2005 through 2015, total expenditures decreased from $1.1 billion to $894 million (-18.8%, p = 0.09); however, expenditures in clinics and retail pharmacies increased (202%, p < 0.01, and 13.8%, p = 0.04, respectively), a trend most pronounced after 2012. Expenditures for flucytosine also increased (968.1%, p < 0.01), particularly in clinics where there was a dramatic 6,640.9% increase (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: From 2005 through 2015, an increase in systemic antifungal expenditures was observed in community settings, despite an overall decrease in total antifungal expenditures in the United States. Large increases in flucytosine expenditures were observed, particularly in the community.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/clasificación , Antifúngicos/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos/clasificación , Costos de los Medicamentos/tendencias , Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Bases de Datos Factuales/tendencias , Economía Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Farmacias/economía , Farmacias/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
15.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 40: 57-62, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27554694

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We set out to compare the rates of Medicare reimbursement to physicians versus hospitals for several major vascular procedures over a period of 5 years. METHODS: We queried the Wolters Kluwer MediRegs database to collect Medicare reimbursement data from fiscal years 2011 to 2015. We surveyed reimbursements for carotid endarterectomy, carotid angioplasty and stenting, femoropopliteal bypass, and lower extremity fem-pop revascularization with stenting. Based on data availability, we surveyed physician reimbursement data on the national level and in both medically overserved and underserved areas. Hospital reimbursement rates were examined on a national level and by hospitals' teaching and wage index statuses. RESULTS: We found that for all 4 vascular procedures, Medicare reimbursements to hospitals increased by a greater percentage than to physicians. By region, underserved areas had lower physician reimbursements than the national average, while the opposite was true for overserved areas. Additionally, for hospital Medicare reimbursements, location in a high wage index accounted for a significant increase in reimbursement over the national average, with teaching status contributing to this increase in a smaller extent. CONCLUSIONS: These data on Medicare reimbursements indicate that payments to hospitals are increasing more significantly than to physicians. This disparity in pay changes affects both independent and academic vascular surgeons. Medicare should consider pay increases to independent providers in accordance to the hospital pay increase.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia/economía , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economía , Economía Hospitalaria , Endarterectomía Carotidea/economía , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/economía , Medicare/economía , Médicos/economía , Injerto Vascular/economía , Angioplastia/instrumentación , Angioplastia/tendencias , Áreas de Influencia de Salud/economía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/tendencias , Economía Hospitalaria/tendencias , Endarterectomía Carotidea/tendencias , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/tendencias , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Precios de Hospital , Costos de Hospital , Hospitales de Enseñanza/economía , Humanos , Área sin Atención Médica , Medicare/tendencias , Médicos/tendencias , Salarios y Beneficios/economía , Stents/economía , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Injerto Vascular/tendencias
16.
Soc Sci Med ; 174: 64-69, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28012431

RESUMEN

There has been extensive outsourcing of hospital cleaning services in the NHS in England, in part because of the potential to reduce costs. Yet some argue that this leads to lower hygiene standards and more infections, such as MRSA and, perhaps because of this, the Scottish, Welsh, and Northern Irish health services have rejected outsourcing. This study evaluates whether contracting out cleaning services in English acute hospital Trusts (legal authorities that run one or more hospitals) is associated with risks of hospital-borne MRSA infection and lower economic costs. By linking data on MRSA incidence per 100,000 hospital bed-days with surveys of cleanliness among patient and staff in 126 English acute hospital Trusts during 2010-2014, we find that outsourcing cleaning services was associated with greater incidence of MRSA, fewer cleaning staff per hospital bed, worse patient perceptions of cleanliness and staff perceptions of availability of handwashing facilities. However, outsourcing was also associated with lower economic costs (without accounting for additional costs associated with treatment of hospital acquired infections).


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Limpieza en Hospital/métodos , Control de Infecciones/economía , Servicios Externos/economía , Servicios Externos/normas , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Economía Hospitalaria/tendencias , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Indicadores de Salud , Hospitales/normas , Hospitales/tendencias , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/prevención & control , Incidencia , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/patogenicidad , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/economía , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Medicina Estatal/economía , Medicina Estatal/tendencias , Recursos Humanos
17.
JAMA ; 316(24): 2647-2656, 2016 12 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28027367

RESUMEN

Importance: Readmission rates declined after announcement of the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP), which penalizes hospitals for excess readmissions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), and pneumonia. Objective: To compare trends in readmission rates for target and nontarget conditions, stratified by hospital penalty status. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries older than 64 years discharged between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2015, from 2214 penalty hospitals and 1283 nonpenalty hospitals. Difference-interrupted time-series models were used to compare trends in readmission rates by condition and penalty status. Exposure: Hospital penalty status or target condition under the HRRP. Main Outcomes and Measures: Thirty-day risk adjusted, all-cause unplanned readmission rates for target and nontarget conditions. Results: The study included 48 137 102 hospitalizations of 20 351 161 Medicare beneficiaries. In January 2008, the mean readmission rates for AMI, HF, pneumonia, and nontarget conditions were 21.9%, 27.5%, 20.1%, and 18.4%, respectively, at hospitals later subject to financial penalties and 18.7%, 24.2%, 17.4%, and 15.7% at hospitals not subject to penalties. Between January 2008 and March 2010, prior to HRRP announcement, readmission rates were stable across hospitals (except AMI at nonpenalty hospitals). Following announcement of HRRP (March 2010), readmission rates for both target and nontarget conditions declined significantly faster for patients at hospitals later subject to financial penalties compared with those at nonpenalized hospitals (for AMI, additional decrease of -1.24 [95% CI, -1.84 to -0.65] percentage points per year relative to nonpenalty discharges; for HF, -1.25 [95% CI, -1.64 to -0.86]; for pneumonia, -1.37 [95% CI, -1.80 to -0.95]; and for nontarget conditions, -0.27 [95% CI, -0.38 to -0.17]; P < .001 for all). For penalty hospitals, readmission rates for target conditions declined significantly faster compared with nontarget conditions (for AMI, additional decline of -0.49 [95% CI, -0.81 to -0.16] percentage points per year relative to nontarget conditions [P = .004]; for HF, -0.90 [95% CI, -1.18 to -0.62; P < .001]; and for pneumonia, -0.57 [95% CI, -0.92 to -0.23; P < .001]). In contrast, among nonpenalty hospitals, readmissions for target conditions declined similarly or more slowly compared with nontarget conditions (for AMI, additional increase of 0.48 [95% CI, 0.01-0.95] percentage points per year [P = .05]; for HF, 0.08 [95% CI, -0.30 to 0.46; P = .67]; for pneumonia, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.13-0.93; P = .01]). After HRRP implementation in October 2012, the rate of change for readmission rates plateaued (P < .05 for all except pneumonia at nonpenalty hospitals), with the greatest relative change observed among hospitals subject to financial penalty. Conclusions and Relevance: Medicare fee-for-service patients at hospitals subject to penalties under the HRRP had greater reductions in readmission rates compared with those at nonpenalized hospitals. Changes were greater for target vs nontarget conditions for patients at the penalized hospitals but not at the other hospitals.


Asunto(s)
Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/tendencias , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Economía Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Economía Hospitalaria/tendencias , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/legislación & jurisprudencia , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/tendencias , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Legislación Hospitalaria , Estudios Longitudinales , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Readmisión del Paciente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Neumonía/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
18.
Enferm. infecc. microbiol. clín. (Ed. impr.) ; 34(10): 620-625, dic. 2016. graf, tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-158733

RESUMEN

INTRODUCCIÓN: El coste incremental que comportan las bacteriemias nosocomiales (BN) se utiliza como medida del impacto de estas infecciones. Los métodos tradicionales de cálculo de coste sobrestiman este incremento al no contemplar variables confusoras. El objetivo de este trabajo es comparar 3 metodologías de cálculo del coste incremental de la BN para corregir los sesgos presentes en análisis previos. MÉTODOS: Se compararon los pacientes que presentaron algún episodio de BN entre 2005 y 2007, con los pacientes con la misma patología sin BN. Los microorganismos causantes se agruparon según la tinción Gram y según si la bacteriemia era monomicrobiana o polimicrobiana, o producida por un hongo. Se compararon 3 métodos de cálculo: 1) estratificación por patología; 2) ajuste econométrico multivariante mediante un modelo lineal generalizado (MLG), y 3) un propensity score matching (PSM) antes del análisis multivariante para controlar los sesgos. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 640 hospitalizaciones con BN y 28.459 sin BN; el coste medio observado fue de 24.515 € y 4.851,6 €, respectivamente. En la estratificación por patología, el coste incremental medio estimado fue de 14.735 €, el grupo de microorganismos que ocasionó menor coste incremental fue el de grampositivos, con 10.051€. En el MLG el coste incremental medio estimado fue de 20.922 €, mientras que utilizando PSM se estimó un coste incremental medio de 11.916 €. En las 3 estimaciones hay diferencias importantes según el grupo de microorganismos. CONCLUSIONES: Utilizar metodologías más elaboradas mejora el ajuste en este tipo de estudios e incrementa el valor de los resultados obtenidos


INTRODUCTION: The excess cost associated with nosocomial bacteraemia (NB) is used as a measurement of the impact of these infections. However, some authors have suggested that traditional methods overestimate the incremental cost due to the presence of various types of bias. The aim of this study was to compare three assessment methods of NB incremental cost to correct biases in previous analyses. METHODS: Patients who experienced an episode of NB between 2005 and 2007 were compared with patients grouped within the same All Patient Refined-Diagnosis-Related Group (APR-DRG) without NB. The causative organisms were grouped according to the Gram stain, and whether bacteraemia was caused by a single or multiple microorganisms, or by a fungus. Three assessment methods are compared: stratification by disease; econometric multivariate adjustment using a generalised linear model (GLM); and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to control for biases in the econometric model. RESULTS: The analysis included 640 admissions with NB and 28,459 without NB. The observed mean cost was €24,515 for admissions with NB and €4,851.6 for controls (without NB). Mean incremental cost was estimated at €14,735 in stratified analysis. Gram positive microorganism had the lowest mean incremental cost, €10,051. In the GLM, mean incremental cost was estimated as €20,922, and adjusting with PSM, the mean incremental cost was €11,916. The three estimates showed important differences between groups of microorganisms. CONCLUSIONS: Using enhanced methodologies improves the adjustment in this type of study and increases the value of the results


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Costos Directos de Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Economía Hospitalaria/tendencias
19.
JAMA ; 316(14): 1475-1483, 2016 Oct 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27727384

RESUMEN

Importance: The Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid eligibility for millions of low-income adults. The choice for states to expand Medicaid could affect the financial health of hospitals by decreasing the proportion of patient volume and unreimbursed expenses attributable to uninsured patients while increasing revenue from newly covered patients. Objective: To estimate the association between the Medicaid expansion in 2014 and hospital finances by assessing differences between hospitals in states that expanded Medicaid and in those states that did not expand Medicaid. Design and Setting: Observational study with analysis of data for nonfederal general medical or surgical hospitals in fiscal years 2011 through 2014, using data from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey and the Health Care Cost Report Information System from the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Multivariable difference-in-difference regression analyses were used to compare states with Medicaid expansion with states without Medicaid expansion. Hospitals in states that expanded Medicaid eligibility before January 2014 were excluded. Exposures: Medicaid expansion in 2014, accounting for variation in fiscal year start dates. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospital-reported information on uncompensated care, uncompensated care as a percentage of total hospital expenses, Medicaid revenue, Medicaid as a percentage of total revenue, operating margins, and excess margins. Results: The sample included between 1200 and 1400 hospitals per fiscal year in 19 states with Medicaid expansion and between 2200 and 2400 hospitals per fiscal year in 25 states without Medicaid expansion (with sample size varying depending on the outcome measured). Expansion of Medicaid was associated with a decline of $2.8 million (95% CI, -$4.1 to -$1.6 million; P < .001) in mean annual uncompensated care costs per hospital. Hospitals in states with Medicaid expansion experienced a $3.2 million increase (95% CI, $0.9 to $5.6 million; P = .008) in mean annual Medicaid revenue per hospital, relative to hospitals in states without Medicaid expansion. Medicaid expansion was also significantly associated with improved excess margins (1.1 percentage points [95% CI, 0.1 to 2.0 percentage points]; P = .04), but not improved operating margins (1.1 percentage points [95% CI, -0.1 to 2.3 percentage points]; P = .06). Conclusions and Relevance: The hospitals located in the 19 states that implemented the Medicaid expansion had significantly increased Medicaid revenue, decreased uncompensated care costs, and improvements in profit margins compared with hospitals located in the 25 states that did not expand Medicaid. Further study is needed to assess longer-term implications of this policy change on hospitals' overall finances.


Asunto(s)
Economía Hospitalaria , Medicaid/economía , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Atención no Remunerada/economía , Adulto , Economía Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Medicaid/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicaid/organización & administración , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Regresión , Atención no Remunerada/tendencias , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...