Evaluation of the early use of norepinephrine in major abdominal surgery on medical and surgical postoperative complications: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (EPON STUDY).

BACKGROUND: Post-induction anaesthesia often promotes intraoperative hypotension (IOH) that can worsen postoperative outcomes. This study aims to assess the benefit of norepinephrine versus ephedrine at the induction of anaesthesia to prevent postoperative complications following major abdominal surgery by preventing IOH. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The EPON STUDY is a prospective single-centre randomised controlled trial with the planned inclusion of 500 patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery at the Amiens University Hospital. The inclusion criteria are patients aged over 50 years weighing more than 50 kg with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score of ≥2 undergoing major abdominal surgery under general anaesthesia. Patients are allocated either to the intervention group (n=250) or the standard group (n=250). In the intervention group, the prevention of post-induction IOH is performed with norepinephrine (dilution to 0.016 mg/mL) using an electric syringe pump at a rate of 0.48 mg/h (30 mL/h) from the start of anaesthesia and then titrated to achieve the haemodynamic target. In the control group, the prevention of post-induction IOH is performed with manual titration of ephedrine, with a maximal dose of 30 mg, followed by perfusion with norepinephrine. In both groups, the haemodynamic target to maintain is a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mm Hg or 70 mm Hg for patients with a medical history of hypertension. An intention-to-treat analysis will be performed. The primary outcome is the Clavien-Dindo score assessed up to 30 days postoperatively. The secondary endpoints are the length of hospital stay and length of stay in an intensive care unit/postoperative care unit; postoperative renal function; postoperative cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, haematological and infectious complications at 1 month; and volume of intraoperative vascular filling and mortality at 1 month. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the committee of protection of the persons of Ile de France in May 2021 (number 21 05 41). The authors will be involved in disseminating the research findings (through attending conferences and co-authoring papers). The results of the study will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05276596.

Oral midodrine for prophylaxis against post-spinal anesthesia hypotension during hip arthroplasty in elderly population: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of midodrine as a prophylaxis against post-spinal hypotension in elderly patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial included elderly patients undergoing hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia. Ninety minutes before the procedure, patients were randomized to receive either 5-mg midodrine or placebo (metoclopramide). After spinal anesthesia, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate were monitored every 2 min for 20 min then every 5 min until the end of the procedure. Post-spinal hypotension (MAP < 80% baseline) was treated with 10 mg ephedrine. The primary outcome was intraoperative ephedrine consumption. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of post-spinal hypotension, bradycardia, and hypertension (MAP increased by > 20% of the baseline reading). RESULTS: We analyzed 29 patients in the midodrine group and 27 in the control group. The intraoperative ephedrine consumption was lower in the midodrine group than in the control group (median [quartiles]: 10 [0, 30] mg versus 30 [20, 43] mg, respectively, P-value: 0.002); and the incidence of intraoperative hypotension was lower in the midodrine group than that in the control group. The incidence of hypertension and bradycardia were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of 5 mg oral midodrine decreased the vasopressor requirements and incidence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for hip surgery in elderly patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on September 22, 2022 at clinicaltrials.gov registry, NCT05548985, URL: https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT05548985 .

Ephedrine alleviates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis by inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition and restraining NF-κB signaling.

Pulmonary fibrosis is a lethal and progressive pulmonary disorder in human beings. Ephedrine is a compound isolated from Ephedra and plays a regulatory role in inflammatory response. This study focused on the anti-pulmonary fibrosis effect of ephedrine and its potential molecular mechanism. After a mouse model of pulmonary fibrosis was established through bleomycin (BLM) induction, the survival percentage, body weight, and pulmonary index were measured. Hematoxylin-eosin staining and Masson's trichrome staining for lung tissues were performed to observe the pathological alterations. The viability of lung epithelial BEAS-2B cells, intracellular production of reactive oxygen species, and the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines were examined by cell counting kit-8 assays, 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCF-DA) staining, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. Immunofluorescence staining was performed to determine E-cadherin and vimentin expression after BLM or ephedrine treatment. The mRNA and protein levels of cytokeratin-8, E-cadherin, α-SMA, and vimentin were subjected to quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunoblotting. Experimental results revealed that ephedrine treatment rescued the repressive impact of BLM on BEAS-2B cell viability, and ephedrine inhibited BLM-induced overproduction of reactive oxygen species and inflammatory response in BEAS-2B cells. Additionally, ephedrine suppressed epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process stimulated by BLM treatment, as demonstrated by the reduced α-SMA and vimentin levels together with the increased cytokeratin-8 and E-cadherin levels in BLM + Ephedrine group. In addition, ephedrine inhibited NF-κB and activated Nrf-2 signaling in BLM-treated BEAS-2B cells. Moreover, ephedrine ameliorated pulmonary fibrosis in BLM-induced mice and improved the survival of model mice. In conclusion, ephedrine attenuates BLM-evoked pulmonary fibrosis by repressing EMT process via blocking NF-κB signaling and activating Nrf-2 signaling, suggesting that ephedrine might become a potential anti-pulmonary fibrosis agent in the future.

Hemodynamic impact of ephedrine on hypotension during general anesthesia: a prospective cohort study on middle-aged and older patients.

BACKGROUND: Ephedrine is a mixed α- and ß-agonist vasopressor that is frequently used for the correction of hypotension during general anesthesia. ß-responsiveness has been shown to decrease with age; therefore, this study aimed to determine whether aging would reduce the pressor effect of ephedrine on hypotension during general anesthesia. METHODS: Seventy-five patients aged ≥ 45 years were included in this study, with 25 patients allocated to each of the three age groups: 45-64 years, 65-74 years, and ≥ 75 years. All patients received propofol, remifentanil, and rocuronium for the induction of general anesthesia, followed by desflurane and remifentanil. Cardiac output (CO) was estimated using esCCO technology. Ephedrine (0.1 mg/kg) was administered for the correction of hypotension. The primary and secondary outcome measures were changes in the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and CO, respectively, at 5 min after the administration of ephedrine.  RESULTS: The administration of ephedrine significantly increased MAP (p < 0.001, mean difference: 8.34 [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.95-10.75] mmHg) and CO (p < 0.001, mean difference: 7.43 [95% CI, 5.20-9.65] %) across all groups. However, analysis of variance revealed that the degree of elevation of MAP (F [2, 72] = 0.546, p = 0.581, η2 = 0.015 [95% CI, 0.000-0.089]) and CO (F [2, 72] = 2.023, p = 0.140, η2 = 0.053 [95% CI, 0.000-0.162]) did not differ significantly among the groups. Similarly, Spearman's rank correlation and multiple regression analysis revealed no significant relation between age and the changes in MAP or CO after the administration of ephedrine. CONCLUSION: The administration of ephedrine significantly increased MAP and CO; however, no significant correlation with age was observed in patients aged > 45 years. These findings suggest that ephedrine is effective for the correction of hypotension during general anesthesia, even in elderly patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR (UMIN000045038; 02/08/2021).

The use of epinephrine infusion for the prevention of spinal hypotension during Caesarean delivery: A randomized controlled dose-finding trial.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare three epinephrine doses for the prevention of spinal hypotension during Caesarean delivery. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial included full-term pregnant women undergoing elective Caesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. The participants received prophylactic epinephrine infusions at rates of 0.01, 0.02, or 0.03 mcg/kg/min. Spinal hypotension (systolic blood pressure <80% of baseline) was managed with a 9-mg ephedrine bolus. The primary outcome was the incidence of spinal hypotension. Secondary outcomes included total ephedrine requirement, the incidence of severe spinal hypotension, excessive tachycardia and hypertension, and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: The final analysis included 271 patients. The incidence of hypotension was lowest in the 0.03 mcg group (11/90 [12%]), followed by the 0.02 mcg (32/91 [35%]) and the 0.01 mcg (55/90 [61%]) groups (p < 0.001). The median ephedrine requirements (quartiles) were also the lowest in the 0.03 mcg group (0 [0-0] mg), followed by the 0.02 mcg (0 [0-9] mg) and the 0.01 mcg (9 [0-18] mg) groups. The incidence of severe hypotension was lower in the 0.03 mcg and 0.02 mcg groups than in the 0.01 mcg group (3/90 [3%], 5/91 [6%], and 15/90 [17%], respectively). The incidences of excessive tachycardia, hypertension, and neonatal outcomes were comparable among the groups. CONCLUSION: The use of epinephrine to prevent spinal hypotension during Caesarean delivery is feasible and effective. An initial dose of 0.03 mcg/kg/min produced the lowest incidence of hypotension compared to 0.02 mcg/kg/min and 0.01 mcg/kg/min doses. The three doses were comparable in terms of the incidence of tachycardia, hypertension, and neonatal outcomes. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05279703.

Ephedrine to treat intraoperative hypotension in infants: what is the target?

Off-label use of medications in paediatric anaesthesia is common practice, owing to the relative paucity of evidence-based dosing regimens in children. Well-performed dose-finding studies, especially in infants, are rare and urgently needed. Unanticipated effects can result when paediatric dosing is based on adult parameters or local traditions. A recent dose-finding study on ephedrine highlights the uniqueness of paediatric dosing in comparison with adult dosing. We discuss the problems of off-label medication use and the lack of evidence for various definitions of hypotension and associated treatment strategies in paediatric anaesthesia. What is the aim of treating hypotension associated with anaesthesia induction: restoring the MAP to awake baseline values or elevating it above a provisional hypotension threshold?

Effective dose of ephedrine for treatment of hypotension after induction of general anaesthesia in neonates and infants less than 6 months of age: a multicentre randomised, controlled, open label, dose escalation trial.

BACKGROUND: The recommended dose of ephedrine in adults (0.1 mg kg-1) frequently fails to treat hypotension after induction of general anaesthesia in neonates and infants less than 6 months of age. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal dose of ephedrine in this population for the treatment of hypotension after induction of general anaesthesia with sevoflurane. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, controlled, dose-escalation trial. Subjects were randomised if presenting a >20% change from baseline in MAP. Six cohorts of 20 subjects each were enrolled. Ten subjects in the first cohort received 0.1 mg kg-1 i. v. (reference dose). For each subsequent cohort, 10 subjects were assigned to the next higher dose (consecutively 0.6, 0.8, 1, 1.2, and 1.4 mg kg-1 i. v.), and the other subjects were assigned to one or more doses already investigated in previous cohorts. The primary outcome was the return of MAP to >80% of baseline at least once within 10 min after ephedrine administration. RESULTS: A total of 119 infants (25% females), with a mean age (standard deviation) of 2.7 (1.3) months, received their allocated dose of ephedrine. The optimal dose of ephedrine was 1.2 mg kg-1, with a percentage of success of 65.5% (95% confidence interval, 35.6-86.4). The doses of ephedrine investigated did not induce adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Doses of ephedrine much higher (∼10-fold) than those used in adults are necessary in neonates and infants for the treatment of hypotension after induction of general anaesthesia with sevoflurane. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02384876.

Evaluating an advanced double intravenous vasopressor automated system to treat hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia is uncertain. A novel double intravenous vasopressor automated (DIVA) system reduces hypotension compared to standard care, and was subsequently modified to an advanced-DIVA (ADIVA) system. The primary objective was to compare ADIVA versus DIVA on incidence of hypotension (systolic BP (SBP) < 80% baseline). METHODS: We conducted a randomized-controlled trial in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. SBP and heart rate were measured continuously using a Nexfin monitor. ADIVA delivered 25 µg phenylephrine (heart rate > 60 beats.min-1) or 2 mg ephedrine (heart rate < 60 beats.min-1) at SBP 90 to 110% of baseline, 50 µg phenylephrine or 4 mg ephedrine at SBP 80 to 90%, and 75 µg phenylephrine or 6 mg ephedrine at SBP < 80%. ADIVA calculated the trend of SBP; vasopressors were administered rapidly if SBP trended downward, or 30 s if SBP trended upward. In contrast, DIVA delivered 25 µg phenylephrine or 2 mg ephedrine at SBP 90 to 100% of baseline, and 50 µg phenylephrine or 4 mg ephedrine at SBP < 90%. Boluses were followed by a 10-s lockout. Other outcomes included hypertension (SBP > 120% baseline), vasopressor consumption, clinical outcomes, and performance measures from spinal anesthesia to fetal delivery. RESULTS: We analyzed 94 parturients (ADIVA: n = 46, DIVA: n = 48), with no difference in the incidence of hypotension between ADIVA (78.3%) and DIVA (83.3%, p = 0.677). ADIVA had significantly higher proportion of hypotensive SBP readings, lower phenylephrine consumption and higher umbilical arterial pH. There was no difference in hypertension, bradycardia, ephedrine consumption, intravenous fluid volume, nausea/vomiting, Apgar scores, and umbilical venous pH or lactate. ADIVA maintained SBP higher above baseline with greater fluctuation than DIVA. CONCLUSION: ADIVA was associated with a greater proportion of hypotensive SBP readings, reduced phenylephrine consumption, and increased umbilical arterial pH than DIVA. Further research is needed to determine the optimal method of vasopressor delivery in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov registry (NCT03620942) on 08/08/2018.

Correlation Between Cerebral Tissue Oxygen Saturation and Oxygen Extraction Fraction During Anesthesia: Monitoring Cerebral Metabolic Demand-supply Balance During Vasopressor Administration.

BACKGROUND: The speculation that cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (SctO 2 ) measured using tissue near-infrared spectroscopy reflects the balance between cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen and cerebral oxygen delivery has not been validated. Our objective was to correlate SctO 2 with cerebral oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) measured using positron emission tomography; OEF is the ratio between cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen and cerebral oxygen delivery and reflects the balance between these 2 variables. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cohort study was based on data collected in a previously published trial assessing phenylephrine versus ephedrine treatment in anesthetized patients undergoing brain tumor surgery. The variables of interest were measured twice over the healthy hemisphere before surgery: the first measurement performed after anesthesia induction and the second measurement performed after induction of a ∼20% increase in blood pressure using either phenylephrine or ephedrine. RESULTS: Data from 24 patients were analyzed. The overall vasopressor-induced relative changes in SctO 2 (ΔSctO 2 ) and OEF (ΔOEF) were 3.16% [interquartile range, -0.73% to 6.04%] and -12.5% [interquartile range, -24.0% to -6.19%], respectively. ΔSctO 2 negatively correlated with ΔOEF after phenylephrine treatment (Spearman rank correlation coefficient [ rs ]=-0.76; P =0.007), ephedrine treatment ( rs =-0.76; P =0.006), and any treatment ( rs =-0.79; P <0.001). ΔSctO 2 significantly associated with ΔOEF based on multivariable analysis with ΔOEF, relative changes in mean arterial pressure, arterial blood oxygen tension, and the bispectral index as covariates ( P =0.036). CONCLUSIONS: The negative correlation between changes in SctO 2 and OEF suggests that SctO 2 may reflect the cerebral metabolic demand-supply balance during vasopressor treatment. The generalizability of our findings in other clinical scenarios remains to be determined.

The Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation Effect of Inotropes/Vasopressors Administered to Treat Intraoperative Hypotension: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.

One of the main concerns of intraoperative hypotension is adequacy of cerebral perfusion, as cerebral blood flow decreases passively when mean arterial pressure falls below the lower limit of cerebral autoregulation. Treatment of intraoperative hypotension includes administration of drugs, such as inotropes and vasopressors, which have different pharmacological effects on cerebral hemodynamics; there is no consensus on the preferred drug to use. We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to pool and analyze data comparing the effect on cerebral oxygen saturation (ScO 2 ) measured by cerebral oximetry of various inotropes/vasopressors used to treat intraoperative hypotension. We searched randomized control trials in Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science. We included studies that enrolled adult patients undergoing surgery under general/spinal anesthesia that compared at least 2 inotropes/vasopressors to treat hypotension. We reviewed 51 full-text manuscripts and included 9 randomized controlled trials in our study. The primary outcome was change in ScO 2 . Our results showed the likelihood that dopamine, ephedrine, and norepinephrine had the lowest probability of decreasing ScO 2 . The suggested rank order to maintain ScO 2 , from higher to lower, was dopamine

Sex-Related Effects of Adrenergic Drugs on Conditioned Pain Modulation: A Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Double-Blind Trial.

Objective: Endogenous pain inhibition can be investigated using conditioned pain modulation (CPM). CPM efficacy has been reported to be influenced by various factors, such as gender and cardiovascular (autonomic) activity. The aim of this study is to describe the effect of pharmacological manipulations of autonomic activity on CPM efficacy. Methods: Thirty healthy participants were enrolled to assess CPM efficacy in 4 experimental sessions. The first session consisted of the determination of baseline CPM effectiveness. The three following sessions were performed in a randomized order and consisted of the injection of (1) esmolol, (2) ephedrine, or (3) placebo, before the conditioning stimulus. Pain intensity induced by using a contact heat stimulation thermode was compared before and after a cold-pressure conditioning stimulus to evaluate CPM effectiveness. Results: Our results show that inhibiting sympathetic nervous activity with esmolol did not have a significant effect on CPM. Conversely, enhancing sympathetic nervous activity with ephedrine increased CPM effectiveness in healthy women but decreased it in men. Conclusions: Increasing sympathetic activity with adrenergic agonists, such as ephedrine, could improve CPM effectiveness in women. It will be interesting to verify if the same results are present in patients suffering from chronic pain and if adrenergic agonists could have better therapeutic effects in women showing reduced CPM effectiveness.

The Safety and Efficacy of Peripherally Administered Norepinephrine during the Perioperative Period.

Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) is a highly prevalent adverse event associated with the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia. While the etiology of IOH is complex and multifactorial, hypotension most often occurs because anesthetic agents decrease vascular smooth muscle tone, impair myocardial contractility, and decrease levels of circulating catecholamines. The vasopressor drugs phenylephrine, norepinephrine (NE), and ephedrine have been traditionally used to counteract anesthesia-induced hypotension, with the sympathomimetic agent phenylephrine historically viewed as the first-line agent. However, NE may have a more advantageous clinical profile for treating hypotension by maintaining or increasing cardiac output and restoring decreased concentrations of circulating catecholamines. Yet despite these advantages, concerns of the safety of peripherally administered NE have limited its use to specific clinical settings such as central line in situ. Recent bench and clinical research examining the efficacy and safety profile of peripherally administered NE indicates that this stigma bears reexamination. Data from human and animal studies suggest that the peripheral administration of NE for the treatment of IOH may not only be acceptable, but in many cases, may be the best option.

Efficacy of Preoperative Oral Midodrine in Preventing Hypotension After Spinal Anesthesia in Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Midodrine was effectively used for prophylaxis against hypotensive syndromes such as postural hypotension and intradialytic hypotension, and during the recovery phase of septic shock. In our study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of prophylactic administration of midodrine tablets before spinal anesthesia in reducing the occurrence of hypotension. METHODS: This randomized placebo-controlled study embraced 67 patients aged 18 to 40 years undergoing elective knee surgery under spinal anesthesia. Patients were randomized to midodrine group (given 10-mg tablets of midodrine) or placebo group (given placebo tablets), and tablets were administered 1 hour before spinal anesthesia (intrathecal injection of 12.5-mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 15-µg fentanyl). The primary outcome was the occurrence of hypotension, defined as a systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or <80% of baseline. Secondary outcomes were hemodynamic characteristics (mean arterial pressure [MAP] and heart rate [HR]) after spinal anesthesia, ephedrine dose, and occurrence of complications including bradycardia, vasovagal attacks, reactive hypertension nausea, vomiting, and shivering. RESULTS: The number of patients who became hypotensive after spinal anesthesia was 5 (14.7%) in midodrine group versus 14 (42.4%) in the placebo group; relative risk (95% confidence interval) was 0.35 (0.14-0.85) ( P = .021). The median (interquartile range) total dose of ephedrine was significantly lower in midodrine group 0 (0-10) mg than in placebo group (0 (0-15) mg; the Hodges-Lehmann median difference (95% confidence interval) was 0 (0-5) mg ( P = .015). For MAP data, the group × time interaction was significant ( P = .038), and the MAP was significantly lower in the placebo group than in the midodrine group after intrathecal injection at 2 minutes ( P = .047), 10 minutes ( P = .045), 15 minutes ( P < .001), 20 minutes ( P = .007), 30 minutes ( P =.013), 45 minutes ( P = .029), 60 minutes ( P = .029), and at the end of surgery ( P < .001). For HR data, the group × time interaction was nonsignificant ( P = .807), and the difference in means (95% confidence interval) between groups collapsing over time was -1.4 (-3.1 to 0.2) beats/min ( P = .096). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the occurrence of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic administration of 10-mg midodrine tablets before spinal anesthesia is an effective method in the prevention of hypotension in young adult patients undergoing elective orthopedic knee surgery.

A randomized comparison of hemodynamic changes in response to a heart rate-dependent phenylephrine/ephedrine protocol versus ephedrine-only for spinal hypotension during elective cesarean section.

AIM: To compare incidences of abnormal heart rate (HR) between the phenylephrine/ephedrine protocol (P/E protocol) against the ephedrine-only (C) protocol, conventionally used for treating predelivery hypotension following spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-eight parturients with pre-delivery hypotension after spinal anesthesia were equally randomized to (1) Group P/E (n = 134), phenylephrine 100 mcg in 10 mL intravenously if HR ≥ 60 beats/min (bpm), or ephedrine 6 mg intravenously if HR < 60 bpm, and 2) Group C (n = 134). The primary outcome was the incidence of the parturients with abnormal HR after vasopressor administration. The secondary outcome was the mean differences of HR and hypotensive periods during the pre-delivery period. RESULTS: There was no significant difference of between-group incidences of bradycardia (12.0% in Group P/E vs 6.7% in Group C, p = 0.136) and tachycardia (26.9% vs 35.8%, p = 0.114). Mean HR was 81.9 bpm (95% confidence interval [CI] 79.9, 84.3) in Group P/E, and 88.8 bpm (86.8, 90.6) in Group C (p < 0.001). The duration of hypotension in relation to the time interval from spinal anesthesia to delivery was 20.9% (95% CI 18.4-23.2) in Group P/E, and 26.5% (23.9-29.3) in Group C (p < 0.01). The calculated area under the curve (AUC) of abnormal HR in relation to time was significantly reduced only in Group P/E (p < 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: The incidences of out-of-range HR were comparable, but the P/E protocol resulted in a lower mean HR and better control of systolic blood pressure than the ephedrine-only protocol.

Novel pathogenic ALG2 mutation causing congenital myasthenic syndrome: A case report.

ALG2 mutations are extremely rare causes of congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS). The clinical phenotype and treatment response is therefore not well described. We present the case of a baby who immediately after birth presented with pronounced truncal hypotonia, proximal muscle weakness and feeding difficulties. Single fibre electromyography showed neuromuscular transmission failure and salbutamol and ephedrine treatment improved both muscle weakness and neuromuscular transmission. Genetic analysis revealed a likely pathogenic variant c.1040del, p.(Gly347Valfs*27) in exon 2 and a variant of uncertain significance, c.239G>A, p.(Gly80Asp) in exon 1 of the ALG2 gene. Western blot in whole cell lysates of HEK293 cells transfected with p.Gly80Asp, or p.Gly347Valfs*27 expression constructs indicated that p.Gly347Valfs*27 is likely a null allele and p.Gly80Asp is pathogenic through marked reduction of ALG2 expression. This case highlights the utility of functional studies in clarifying variants of unknown significance, in suspected cases of CMS.

Ondansetron reduces the incidence of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in non-caesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The incidence rates of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension vary depending on the surgical procedures. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of prophylactic ondansetron in reducing the incidence of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension in non-caesarean delivery. Thirteen trials consisting of 1166 patients were included for analysis. Compared to placebo, there is a low quality of evidence that ondansetron was effective in reducing the incidence of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.87; p = 0.005) and bradycardia (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.90; p = 0.02). We also found a moderate quality of evidence that ondansetron lowered the number of rescue ephedrine (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.87; p = 0.007). Patients treated with ondansetron have higher mean arterial pressure 15 to 20 minutes after spinal anaesthesia induction and higher systolic arterial pressure 5, 10, 15 and 20 minutes after spinal anaesthesia. The evidence suggests that prophylactic administration of ondansetron results in the reduction of the incidence of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension, bradycardia and rescue ephedrine in patients undergoing non-caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia.

Therapeutic appraisal of ephedrine against rheumatoid arthritis: A new indication.

Ephedra, natural flora has been used traditionally to treat rheumatism since decades. The scientific evidence of anti-rheumatic effect of this plant has also been reported. But the anti-rheumatic activity of major constituent of this plant (ephedrine) has not been evaluated. Based on this, the current study was aimed to assess anti-arthritic activity of ephedrine by using in vitro and in vivo approaches. Correspondingly, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay was performed for the estimation of prostaglandins E2 (PGE2) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in serum of formaldehyde-induced arthritic animals. The results elaborated significant reduction in albumin denaturation and remarkable progress on stabilization of red blood cells outer membrane at higher concentration during in vitro experiments. The ephedrine (40mg/kg) revealed noteworthy (p<0.001) inhibition in paw swelling in animals intoxicated with albumin as well as formaldehyde as compared to animals of control group by in vivo results. In this assay, ephedrine (20 & 40 mg/kg orally) significantly suppressed the level of these inflammatory markers (PGE2 & TNF-α). Ephedrine exhibited anti-arthritic effect by decreasing pro-inflammatory cytokines (PGE2 & TNF-α). This experimental work pharmacologically supports the use of ephedrine as anti-rheumatic drug but limited to evaluate in immunological arthritic model.

THE USE OF EPHEDRINE TO TREAT ANESTHESIA-ASSOCIATED HYPOTENSION IN PINNIPEDS.

Hypotension is a common adverse effect of general anesthesia that has historically been difficult to measure in pinniped species due to technical challenges. A retrospective case review found seven pinniped cases that demonstrated anesthesia-associated hypotension diagnosed by direct blood pressure measurements during general anesthesia at The Marine Mammal Center (Sausalito, CA) between 2017 and 2019. Cases included five California sea lions (CSL: Zalophus californianus), one Hawaiian monk seal (HMS: Neomonachus schauinslandi), and one northern elephant seal (NES: Mirounga angustirostris). Patients were induced using injectable opioids, benzodiazepines, and anesthetics including propofol and alfaxalone. Excluding the HMS, all patients required supplemental isoflurane with a mask to achieve an anesthetic plane allowing for intubation. Each patient was maintained with inhalant isoflurane in oxygen for the duration of the anesthetic event. Each patient was concurrently administered continuous IV fluids and four patients received fluid boluses prior to administration of ephedrine. All hypotensive anesthetized patients were treated with IV ephedrine (0.05-0.2 mg/kg). The average initial systolic (SAP) and mean (MAP) arterial blood pressures for the CSL prior to ephedrine administration were 71 ± 14 mmHg and 48 ± 12 mmHg respectively. The average SAP and MAP for the CSL increased to 119 ± 32 mmHg and 90 ± 34 mmHg respectively within 5 m of ephedrine administration. The NES initial blood pressure measurement was 59/43 (50) (SAP/diastolic [MAP]) mmHg and increased to 80/51 (62) mmHg within 5 m. The initial HMS blood pressure was 79/68 (73) mmHg and increased to 99/78 (85) mmHg within 5 m following ephedrine administration. All patients recovered from anesthesia. These results support the efficacy of IV ephedrine for the treatment of anesthesia-associated hypotension in pinnipeds.

Treatment of intraoperative hypotension with cafedrine/theodrenaline versus ephedrine : A prospective, national, multicenter, non-interventional study-the HYPOTENS trial.

BACKGROUND: Sympathomimetic drugs are a therapeutic cornerstone for the management of hypotensive states like intraoperative hypotension (IOH). While cafedrine/theodrenaline (C/T) is widely used in Germany to restore blood pressure in patients with IOH, more research is required to compare its effectiveness with alternatives such as ephedrine (E) that are more commonly available internationally. METHODS: HYPOTENS (NCT02893241, DRKS00010740) was a prospective, national, multicenter, open-label, two-armed, non-interventional study that compared C/T with E for treatment of IOH. We describe a prospectively defined cohort of patients ≥50 years old with comorbidities undergoing general anesthesia induced with propofol and fentanyl. Primary objectives were to examine treatment precision, rapidity of onset and the ability to restore blood pressure without relevant increases in heart rate. Secondary endpoints were treatment satisfaction and the number of required additional boluses or other accompanying measures. RESULTS: A total of 1496 patients were included in the per protocol analysis. Overall, effective stabilization of blood pressure was achieved with both C/T and E. Post-hoc analysis showed that blood pressure increase from baseline was more pronounced with C/T. Fewer additional boluses or other accompanying measures were required in the C/T arm. The incidence of tachycardia was comparable between groups. Post-hoc analysis showed that E produced dose-dependent elevated heart rate values. By contrast, heart rate remained stable in patients treated with C/T. Physicians reported a higher level of treatment satisfaction with C/T, with a higher proportion of anesthetists rating treatment precision and rapidity of onset as good or very good when compared with E. CONCLUSION: Neither drug was superior in restoring blood pressure levels; however, post-hoc analyses suggested that treatment is more goal-orientated and easier to control with C/T. Heart rate was shown to be more stable with C/T and fewer additional interventions were required to restore blood pressure, which could have contributed to the increased treatment satisfaction reported by anesthetists using C/T.