Diabetes mellitus in pregnancy across Canada.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary estimates of diabetes mellitus (DM) rates in pregnancy are lacking in Canada. Accordingly, this study examined trends in the rates of type 1 (T1DM), type 2 (T2DM) and gestational (GDM) DM in Canada over a 15-year period, and selected adverse pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: This study used repeated cross-sectional data from the Canadian Institute of Health Information (CIHI) hospitalization discharge abstract database (DAD). Maternal delivery records were linked to their respective birth records from 2006 to 2019. The prevalence of T1DM, T2DM and GDM were calculated, including relative changes over time, assessed by a Cochrane-Armitage test. Also assessed were differences between provinces and territories in the prevalence of DM. RESULTS: Over the 15-year study period, comprising 4,320,778 hospital deliveries in Canada, there was a statistically significant increase in the prevalence of GDM and T1DM and T2DM. Compared to pregnancies without DM, all pregnancies with any form of DM had higher rates of hypertension and Caesarian delivery, and also adverse infant outcomes, including major congenital anomalies, preterm birth and large-for-gestational age birthweight. CONCLUSION: Among 4.3 million pregnancies in Canada, there has been a rise in the prevalence of DM. T2DM and GDM are expected to increase further as more overweight women conceive in Canada.

Prematurity and congenital malformations differ according to the type of pregestational diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is the most common metabolic disorder in pregnancy. Women with Type 2 DM seems to have no better perinatal outcomes than those with Type 1 DM. METHODS: Single-center prospective cohort observational study. Pregnant women with diabetes (141 with Type 1 DM and 124 with Type 2 DM) that were followed in the university hospital between 2009 and 2021 were included in this study. Clinical data and obstetric and perinatal outcomes were collected. RESULTS: As expected, women with Type 1 DM were younger and had a longer duration of diabetes than women with Type 2 DM. Obesity and chronic hypertension were higher in the group of women with Type 2 DM and their value of HbA1c in the second and third trimesters were lower than in Type 1 DM. No differences in prematurity were found, but more extreme prematurity was observed in Type 2 DM, as well as a higher rate of congenital malformations. The frequency of hypoglycemia and the weight of the newborn was higher in Type 1 DM. The maternal independent factors related to the weight of the newborn were: the glycemic control at the third trimester, the weight gain during pregnancy, and pregestational BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Newborns born to mothers with Type 1 DM were larger and had a higher frequency of hypoglycemia, while congenital malformations and precocious preterm was more associated to Type 2 DM. Metabolic control, weight gain and pregestational weight were important determinants of both obstetric and neonatal complications.

Association between extrapolated time in range and large for gestational age infants in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes.

AIMS: To evaluate the association between extrapolated time in range (eTIR), measured by self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants in pregnancies with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis including singleton pregnancies with T1D who started antenatal care before 20 gestational weeks and delivered live newborns at a Brazilian hospital between 2010 and 2019, with LGA fetuses as the main outcome. Glycemic records acquired using SMBG were categorized as eTIR, extrapolated time below range (eTBR), and extrapolated time above range (eTAR). Women were divided into two groups (LGA and adequate for gestational age [AGA]) and compared regarding clinical characteristics, obstetric outcomes, and frequencies of eTIR, eTBR, and eTAR. Logistic regression analysis verified the independent predictive variables for LGA infants. RESULTS: Data from 125 pregnancies were analyzed. For the first, second and third trimesters, each 1 % increase in eTIR was associated with a decreased risk of LGA by 2.9 % (OR: 0.971; 95%CI: 0.945-0.998), 2.5 % (OR: 0.975; 95%CI: 0.951-0.999) and 2.3 % (OR: 0.977; 95%CI: 0.955-0.998) and each 1 % increase in eTAR was associated with an increased risk of LGA by 2.7 % (OR: 1.027; 95%CI: 1.005-1.050), 3.9 % (OR: 1.039; 95%CI: 1.014-1.063) and 4.6 % (OR: 1.046; 95%CI: 1.018-1.075), respectively. CONCLUSION: The concept of TIR can be extrapolated to patients undergoing SMBG to assess the risk of LGA infants in pregnant women with T1D.

Danish Diabetes Birth Registry 2: a study protocol of a national prospective cohort study to monitor outcomes of pregnancies of women with pre-existing diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Despite technological developments and intensified care, pregnancies in women with pre-existing diabetes are still considered high-risk pregnancies. The rate of adverse outcomes in pregnancies affected by diabetes in Denmark is currently unknown, and there is a limited understanding of mechanisms contributing to this elevated risk. To address these gaps, the Danish Diabetes Birth Registry 2 (DDBR2) was established. The aims of this registry are to evaluate maternal and fetal-neonatal outcomes based on 5 years cohort data, and to identify pathophysiology and risk factors associated with short-term and long-term outcomes of pregnancies in women with pre-existing diabetes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The DDBR2 registry is a nationwide 5-year prospective cohort with an inclusion period from February 2023 to February 2028 of pregnancies in women with all types of pre-existing diabetes and includes registry, clinical and questionnaire data and biological samples of mother-partner-child trios. Eligible families (parents age ≥18 years and sufficient proficiency in Danish or English) can participate by either (1) basic level data obtained from medical records (mother and child) and questionnaires (partner) or (2) basic level data and additional data which includes questionnaires (mother and partner) and blood samples (all). The primary maternal outcome is Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels at the end of pregnancy and the primary offspring endpoint is the birth weight SD score. The DDBR2 registry will be complemented by genetic, epigenetic and metabolomic data as well as a biobank for future research, and the cohort will be followed through data from national databases to illuminate possible mechanisms that link maternal diabetes and other parental factors to a possible increased risk of adverse long-term child outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval from the Ethical Committee is obtained (S-20220039). Findings will be sought published in international scientific journals and shared among the participating hospitals and policymakers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05678543.

The IRELAnD study-investigating the role of early low-dose aspirin in diabetes mellitus: a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Although aspirin therapy is being increasingly advocated with the intention of risk modification for a wide range of pregnancy complications, women with prepregnancy diabetes mellitus are commonly excluded from clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to examine the effect of aspirin therapy on a composite measure of adverse perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by pregestational diabetes mellitus. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial was conducted at 6 university-affiliated perinatology centers. Women with type 1 diabetes mellitus or type 2 diabetes mellitus of at least 6 months' duration were randomly allocated to 150-mg daily aspirin or placebo from 11 to 14 weeks' gestation until 36 weeks. Established vascular complications of diabetes mellitus, including chronic hypertension or nephropathy, led to exclusion from the trial. The primary outcome was a composite measure of placental dysfunction (preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, preterm birth <34 weeks' gestation, or perinatal mortality). The planned sample size was 566 participants to achieve a 35% reduction in the primary outcome, assuming 80% statistical power. Secondary end points included maternal and neonatal outcomes and determination of insulin requirements across gestation. Data were centrally managed using ClinInfo and analyzed using SAS 9.4. The 2 treatment groups were compared using t tests or chi-square tests, as required, and longitudinal data were compared using a repeated-measures analysis. RESULTS: From February 2020 to September 2022, 191 patients were deemed eligible, 134 of whom were enrolled (67 randomized to aspirin and 67 to placebo) with a retrospective power of 64%. A total of 101 (80%) women had type 1 diabetes mellitus and 25 (20%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus. Reaching the target sample size was limited by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Baseline characteristics were similar between the aspirin and placebo groups. Treatment compliance was very high and similar between groups (97% for aspirin, 94% for placebo). The risk of the composite measure of placental dysfunction did not differ between groups (25% aspirin vs 21% placebo; P=.796). Women in the aspirin group had significantly lower insulin requirements throughout pregnancy compared with the placebo group. Insulin requirements in the aspirin group increased on average from 0.7 units/kg at baseline to 1.1 units/kg by 36 weeks' gestation (an average 83% within-patient increase), and increased from 0.7 units/kg to 1.3 units/kg (a 181% within-patient increase) in the placebo group, over the same gestational period (P=.002). Serial hemoglobin A1c levels were lower in the aspirin group than in the placebo group, although this trend did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: In this multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial, aspirin did not reduce the risk of adverse perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by prepregnancy diabetes mellitus. Compared with the placebo group, aspirin-treated patients required significantly less insulin throughout pregnancy, indicating a beneficial effect of aspirin on glycemic control. Aspirin may exert a plausible placenta-mediated effect on pregestational diabetes mellitus that is not limited to its antithrombotic properties.

Preterm delivery and maternal obesity remain common complications in pregnancies with type 1 diabetes-A nationwide study in Sweden.

AIM: A primary goal of obstetric care of women with type 1 diabetes (T1D) is to reduce the risks of preterm birth (PTB). Besides hyperglycaemia, maternal obesity is an important risk factor for PTB in T1D. However, it's unclear if public health efforts decreased risks of maternal obesity and PTB in pregnancies with T1D. We examined time-trends over the last 20 years in the distribution of gestational ages at birth (GA) in offspring of women with T1D in Sweden, and in maternal BMI in the same mothers. METHODS: Population-based cohort study, using data from national registries in Sweden. To capture differences not only in the median values, we used quantile regression models to compare the whole distributions of GA's and early pregnancy BMI between deliveries in 1998-2007 (P1) and 2008-2016 (P2). Multivariable models were adjusted for differences in maternal age, smoking and education between periods 1 and 2. RESULTS: The study included 7639 offspring of women with T1D between 1998 and 2016. The 10% percentile GA, increased with 0.09 days (95% CI: -0.11 to 0.35) between P1 and P2. The 90% percentile for BMI was 1.20 kg/m2 higher (95% CI: 0.57 to 1.83) in P2. Risks of PTB remained stable over time also when adjusting for maternal BMI. CONCLUSION: Despite modern diabetes management, the distribution of GA, and consequently the risk of PTB in T1D, remained unchanged from 1998 to 2016. During the same time, maternal BMI increased, particularly in the already obese.

Preconception episodes of severe hypoglycemia and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: To explore the relationship between preconception severe hypoglycemia (PSH) and pregnancy outcomes in pregnancies complicated with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicenter prospective cohort study, women with pregestational T1DM were stratified by episodes of severe hypoglycemia within 1 year before conception: No PSH, sporadic PSH (1-6 times/year), and recurrent PSH (>6 times/year). We analysed the predictive ability of PSH for maternal and neonatal outcomes using log-binomial regression models and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Of the 124 women studied, 37.1% experienced at least one episode of severe hypoglycemia preconception. In the multiple adjusted regression models, recurrent PSH was significantly associated with increased incidence of preeclampsia (RR 17.59, 95% CI: 2.89-150.62, p for trend = 0.007), preterm birth (RR 6.34, 95% CI: 1.22-40.63, p for trend = 0.027), neonatal hypoglycemia (RR 4.52, 95% CI: 1.14-17.16, p for trend = 0.017), neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (RR 4.12, 95% CI: 1.11-15.56, p for trend = 0.004), and composite neonatal outcome (RR 3.85, 95% CI: 1.01-19.61, p for trend = 0.003). In the ROC analysis, PSH predicted preeclampsia, preterm birth, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, and composite neonatal outcome with areas under the ROC curve all ≥0.6. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent preconception severe hypoglycemia is associated with increased risks of adverse outcomes in pregnant women with T1DM.

Risk of Breast Cancer After Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Population-based Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Diabetes is associated with an increased risk of several cancers, including postmenopausal breast cancer. The evidence for higher breast cancer risk after diabetes in pregnancy is conflicting. We compared the incidence of breast and other cancers between pregnant women with and without diabetes. METHODS: This work was a propensity-matched, retrospective cohort study using population-based health-care databases from Ontario, Canada. Those deliveries with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and pregestational diabetes mellitus (pregestational DM) were identified and matched to deliveries without diabetes mellitus (non-DM). Deliveries from each diabetes cohort were matched 1:2 on age, parity, year of delivery, and propensity score to non-DM deliveries. Matched subjects were followed from delivery for incidence of breast cancer as a primary outcome, and other site-specific cancers as secondary outcomes. We performed Cox proportional hazards regression to compare rates of breast cancer between matched groups. RESULTS: Over a median of 8 (interquartile range 4 to 13) years of follow-up, compared with non-DM deliveries, the incidence of breast cancer was significantly lower for GDM but similar for pregestational DM deliveries (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 0.98; and HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.07, respectively). GDM was associated with a significantly higher incidence of pancreatic and hepatocellular cancer, and pregestational DM was associated with a higher incidence of thyroid, hepatocellular, and endometrial cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes in pregnancy does not have a higher short-term risk of subsequent breast cancer, but there may be a higher incidence of other cancers.

Validity of Alternative Claims-based Algorithms for Type 1, Type 2, and Gestational Diabetes in Pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim in this study was to evaluate the accuracy of alternative algorithms for identifying pre-existing type 1 or 2 diabetes (T1DM or T2DM) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in pregnant women. METHODS: Data from a clinical registry of pregnant women presenting to an Edmonton diabetes clinic between 2002 and 2009 were linked and administrative health records. Three algorithms for identifying women with T1DM, T2DM, and GDM based on International Classification of Diseases---tenth revision (ICD-10) codes were assessed: delivery hospitalization records (Algorithm #1), outpatient clinics during pregnancy (Algorithm #2), and delivery hospitalization plus outpatient clinics during pregnancy (Algorithm #3). In a subset of women with clinic visits between 2005 and 2009, we examined the performance of an additional Algorithm #4 based on Algorithm #3 plus outpatient clinics in the 2 years before pregnancy. Using the diabetes clinical registry as the "gold standard," we calculated true positive rates and agreement levels for the algorithms. RESULTS: The clinical registry included data on 928 pregnancies, of which 90 were T1DM, 89 were T2DM, and 749 were GDM. Algorithm #3 had the highest true positive rate for the detection of T1DM, T2DM, and GDM of 94%, 72%, and 99.9%, respectively, resulting in an overall agreement of 97% in diagnosis between the administrative databases and the clinical registry. Algorithm #4 did not provide much improvement over Algorithm #3 in overall agreement. CONCLUSIONS: An algorithm based on ICD-10 codes in the delivery hospitalization and outpatient clinic records during pregnancy can be used to accurately identify women with T1DM, T2DM, and GDM.

Post Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial: interrupted time series analysis of respiratory outcomes in twin and pregestational diabetes.

BACKGROUND: The Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial found that corticosteroid administration decreased respiratory complications by 20% among late preterm singleton deliveries. After the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial, corticosteroid administration increased by 76% among twin pregnancies and 113% among singleton pregnancies complicated by pregestational diabetes mellitus compared with expected rates based on the pre-Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial trend. However, the effect of corticosteroids on twin pregnancies and pregnancies complicated by pregestational diabetes mellitus is not well studied, as the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial excluded twin pregnancies and pregnancies complicated by pregestational diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the change in the incidence rate of immediate assisted ventilation use and ventilation use for more than 6 hours among 2 populations after the dissemination of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial at the population level. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a retrospective analysis of publicly available US birth certificate data. The study period was from August 1, 2014, to April 30, 2018. The dissemination period of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial was from February 2016 to October 2016. Population-based interrupted time series analyses were performed for 2 target populations: (1) twin pregnancies not complicated by pregestational diabetes mellitus and (2) singleton pregnancies complicated by pregestational diabetes mellitus. For both target populations, analyses were limited to individuals who delivered nonanomalous live neonates between 34 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks of gestation (vaginal or cesarean delivery). As a sensitivity analysis, a total of 23 placebo tests were conducted before (5 tests) and after (18 tests) the dissemination period. RESULTS: For the analysis of late preterm twin deliveries, 191,374 individuals without pregestational diabetes mellitus were identified. For the analysis of late preterm singleton pregnancy with pregestational diabetes mellitus, 21,395 individuals were identified. After the dissemination period, the incidence rate of immediate assisted ventilation use for late preterm twin deliveries was significantly lower than the expected value based on the pre-Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial trend (11.6% observed vs 13.0% expected; adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.97). The incidence rate of ventilation use for more than 6 hours among late preterm twin deliveries did not change significantly after the dissemination of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial. A significant increase in the incidence rate of immediate assisted ventilation use and ventilation use for more than 6 hours was found among singleton pregnancies with pregestational diabetes mellitus. However, the results of placebo tests suggested that the increase in incidence was not necessarily due to the dissemination period of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial. CONCLUSION: The dissemination of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial was associated with decreased incidence of immediate assisted ventilation use, but no change in ventilation use for more than 6 hours, among late preterm twin deliveries in the United States. In contrast, the incidence of neonatal respiratory outcomes among singleton deliveries with pregestational diabetes mellitus did not decrease after the dissemination of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial.

The impact of diabetes during pregnancy on neonatal outcomes among the Aboriginal population in Western Australia: a whole-population study.

BACKGROUND: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (hereafter Aboriginal) women have a high prevalence of diabetes in pregnancy (DIP), which includes pre-gestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We aimed to characterize the impact of DIP in babies born to Aboriginal mothers. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study, using routinely collected linked health data that included all singleton births (N = 510 761) in Western Australia between 1998 and 2015. Stratified by Aboriginal status, generalized linear mixed models quantified the impact of DIP on neonatal outcomes, estimating relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. Ratio of RRs (RRRs) examined whether RRs differed between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations. RESULTS: Exposure to DIP increased the risk of adverse outcomes to a greater extent in Aboriginal babies. PGDM heightened the risk of large for gestational age (LGA) (RR: 4.10, 95% CI: 3.56-4.72; RRR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.09-1.43), macrosomia (RR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.67-2.48; RRR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.14-1.69), shoulder dystocia (RR: 4.51, 95% CI: 3.14-6.49; RRR: 2.19, 95% CI: 1.44-3.33) and major congenital anomalies (RR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.68-2.74; RRR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.24-2.10). GDM increased the risk of LGA (RR: 2.63, 95% CI: 2.36-2.94; RRR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.80-2.22), macrosomia (RR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.72-2.21; RRR: 2.27, 95% CI: 2.01-2.56) and shoulder dystocia (RR: 2.78, 95% CI: 2.12-3.63; RRR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.61-2.77). Birthweight mediated about half of the DIP effect on shoulder dystocia only in the Aboriginal babies. CONCLUSIONS: DIP differentially increased the risks of fetal overgrowth, shoulder dystocia and congenital anomalies in Aboriginal babies. Improving care for Aboriginal women with diabetes and further research on preventing shoulder dystocia among these women can reduce the disparities.

Use of metformin and insulin among pregnant women with gestation diabetes in the United Kingdom: A population-based cohort study.

AIMS: The contemporary prescription patterns of antidiabetic drugs following guideline changes recommending metformin as first-line gestational diabetes (GDM) pharmacotherapy is underexplored. We aimed to examined use of metformin and insulin during pregnancy among women with GDM over 20 years in the United Kingdom. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using linked data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, its pregnancy register and Hospital Episode Statistics from 1998 to 2017. We included pregnancies of women without prior diabetes history who received GDM diagnosis or initiated an antidiabetic drug after 20 weeks gestation. Patient-level and practice-level characteristics were compared between metformin initiators and insulin initiators. We described trends of initiating metformin as first-line treatment and described time to initiation of rescue insulin overall, and by body mass index among metformin initiators. RESULTS: Our cohort included 5633 pregnancies from 5393 women with GDM, of whom 38.9% initiated pharmacotherapy (41% insulin, 59% metformin). Metformin prescriptions (as opposed to insulin) increased substantially, from <5% of pregnancies before 2007 to 42.5% in 2008. Over 85% of pregnancies that were prescribed pharmacotherapy were prescribed metformin as first-line treatment in 2015. Among metformin initiators, 16% initiated rescue insulin, typically occurring within 40 days of metformin initiation. Choice of GDM pharmacotherapy varied by characteristics, including smoking, obesity, race/ethnicity and general practice regions. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin was the most prescribed medication for GDM, with large increases over the past 2 decades. The increasing use of oral-antidiabetic drugs during pregnancy, consistent with other regions, highlights the need for future studies examining effectiveness and safety of antidiabetic drug use during pregnancy.

Association of community walkability and glycemic control among pregnant individuals with pregestational diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Neighborhood walkability is a community-level social determinant of health that measures whether people who live in a neighborhood walk as a mode of transportation. Whether neighborhood walkability is associated with glycemic control among pregnant individuals with pregestational diabetes remains to be defined. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the association between community-level neighborhood walkability and glycemic control as measured by hemoglobin A1c (A1C) among pregnant individuals with pregestational diabetes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of pregnant individuals with pregestational diabetes enrolled in an integrated prenatal and diabetes care program from 2012 to 2016. Participant addresses were geocoded and linked at the census-tract level. The exposure was community walkability, defined by the US Environmental Protection Agency National Walkability Index (score range 1-20), which incorporates intersection density (design), proximity to transit stops (distance), and a mix of employment and household types (diversity). Individuals from neighborhoods that were the most walkable (score, 15.26-20.0) were compared with those from neighborhoods that were less walkable (score <15.26), as defined per national Environmental Protection Agency recommendations. The outcomes were glycemic control, including A1C <6.0% and <6.5%, measured both in early and late pregnancy, and mean change in A1C across pregnancy. Modified Poisson regression and linear regression were used, respectively, and adjusted for maternal age, body mass index at delivery, parity, race and ethnicity as a social determinant of health, insurance status, baseline A1C, gestational age at A1C measurement in early and late pregnancy, and diabetes type. RESULTS: Among 417 pregnant individuals (33% type 1, 67% type 2 diabetes mellitus), 10% were living in the most walkable communities. All 417 individuals underwent A1C assessment in early pregnancy (median gestational age, 9.7 weeks; interquartile range, 7.4-14.1), and 376 underwent another A1C assessment in late pregnancy (median gestational age, 30.4 weeks; interquartile range, 27.8-33.6). Pregnant individuals living in the most walkable communities were more likely to have an A1C <6.0% in early pregnancy (15% vs 8%; adjusted relative risk, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-2.16), and an A1C <6.5% in late pregnancy compared with those living in less walkable communities (13% vs 9%; adjusted relative risk, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.63). For individuals living in the most walkable communities, the median A1C was 7.5 (interquartile range, 6.0-9.4) in early pregnancy and 5.9 (interquartile range, 5.4-6.4) in late pregnancy. For those living in less walkable communities, the median A1C was 7.3 (interquartile range, 6.2-9.2) in early pregnancy and 6.2 (interquartile range, 5.6-7.1) in late pregnancy. Change in A1C across pregnancy was not associated with walkability. CONCLUSION: Pregnant individuals with pregestational diabetes mellitus living in more walkable communities had better glycemic control in both early and late pregnancy. Whether community-level interventions to enhance neighborhood walkability can improve glycemic control in pregnancy requires further study.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy pre- and postaspirin guideline publication in individuals with pregestational diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: The US Preventive Services Taskforce published guidelines in 2014 recommending that low-dose aspirin be initiated between 12 and 28 weeks of gestation among high-risk patients for preeclampsia prophylaxis. Moreover, low-dose aspirin is recommended by some clinicians for the prevention of preterm birth. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether there is an association between the US Preventive Services Taskforce aspirin guideline hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and the rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and preterm birth in individuals with pregestational diabetes mellitus. STUDY DESIGN: This was a repeated cross-sectional analysis of individuals with pregestational diabetes mellitus and at least 1 singleton delivery at >20 weeks of gestation with records available in the National Vital Statistics System between 2010 and 2018. The primary outcome was hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and the secondary outcome was preterm birth. Demographics and clinical characteristics among individuals in the pre-US Preventive Services Taskforce guideline cohort (2010-2013) were compared with that of individuals in the post-US Preventive Services Taskforce guideline cohort (2015-2018). Multivariable regression estimated the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association between guideline publication and the selected endpoints. Effect modification was assessed for access to prenatal care using the Kotelchuck Index (<80% vs ≥80%). Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis limited to nulliparas was performed. RESULTS: Overall, 224,065 individuals were included. Individuals in the post-US Preventive Services Taskforce guideline cohort were more likely to be older, be obese, and have a history of preterm birth. In unadjusted and adjusted modeling, delivery in the post-US Preventive Services Taskforce guideline cohort was associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.28) and preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.12). The adjusted odds ratios for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and preterm birth were more pronounced among those with less than adequate access to care. The findings were similar in the sensitivity analysis of only nulliparas. CONCLUSION: Delivery after US Preventive Services Taskforce aspirin guideline publication was associated with higher rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and preterm birth in a population of individuals with diabetes mellitus. It is unknown whether patient or practitioner factors, or other changes in obstetrical care, contributed to these findings.

Trends in delivery hospitalizations with pregestational and gestational diabetes mellitus and associated outcomes: 2000-2019.

BACKGROUND: Pregestational diabetes mellitus and its associated risks may be increasing in the obstetrical population. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize the trends in delivery hospitalizations with pregestational diabetes mellitus, the prevalence of chronic diabetes complications, and the risk for adverse outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This repeated, cross-sectional study used the United States National Inpatient Sample to identify delivery hospitalizations with pregestational diabetes mellitus between 2000 and 2019. Trends in delivery hospitalizations with pregestational diabetes mellitus were assessed using joinpoint regression to determine the average annual percent change. Trends in chronic diabetes complications, including chronic kidney disease, neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, and diabetic retinopathy, were also analyzed. The risk for adverse obstetrical outcomes was compared between patients with and those without pregestational diabetes mellitus using adjusted logistic regression models that were adjusted for demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics with adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals as measures of association. RESULTS: Of 76.7 million delivery hospitalizations, 179,885 (0.23%) had type 1 diabetes mellitus, 430,544 (0.56%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 99,327 (0.13%) had unspecified diabetes mellitus. From 2000 to 2019, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus increased from 1.8 to 7.3 per 1000 deliveries for type 2 diabetes mellitus (average annual percent change, 8.0%; 95% confidence interval, 6.9%-9.2%), from 1.5 to 3.2 per 1000 deliveries for unspecified diabetes mellitus (average annual percent change, 3.9%; 95% confidence interval, 1.4%-6.3%), and from 2.7 in 2000 to 2.8 per 1000 deliveries (average annual percent change, 0.2%; 95% confidence interval, -0.8% to 1.3%) for type 1 diabetes mellitus. The prevalence of chronic diabetes mellitus complications increased from 2.7% to 5.6% over the study period (average annual percent change, 5.9%; 95% confidence interval, 3.7%-8.0%). Pregestational diabetes mellitus was associated with severe maternal morbidity, cesarean delivery, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preterm birth, and shoulder dystocia. CONCLUSION: Pregestational diabetes mellitus increased over the study period, driven by a quadrupling in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Notably, the prevalence of chronic diabetes mellitus complications doubled concomitantly. Pregestational diabetes mellitus was associated with a range of adverse outcomes. These findings are further evidence that pregestational diabetes mellitus is an important contributor to maternal risk and that optimizing diabetes care in women of childbearing age will continue to be of major public health importance.

Secular trend in prevalence and socioeconomic correlates of diabetes in pregnancy in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the trend in prevalence and socioeconomic correlates of diabetes in pregnancy (DIP) in Taiwan from 2007 to 2014. METHODS: In all, 1 606 344 pregnancies, including 199 383 DIP (1693 with pre-pregnancy type 1 diabetes [T1DM], 17 171 with pre-pregnancy type 2 diabetes [T2DM], and 180 519 with gestational diabetes mellitus [GDM]) were investigated. Logistic regression models were performed to identify the covariates significantly associating with DIP. RESULTS: Over the study period, the prevalence of pre-pregnancy T2DM increased by 568.44%; the prevalence of T1DM and GDM also increased but with a smaller magnitude. However, only the prevalence of pre-pregnancy T2DM showed an increase after socioeconomic variables were considered. Compared with immigrant mothers, native-born mothers had a significantly higher adjusted odds ratio of DIP, particularly pre-pregnancy T1DM (3.33, 95% confidence interval 1.57-7.05). Additionally, indigenous mothers and those from rural areas had a higher prevalence of pre-pregnancy T2DM but lower prevalence of GDM. Lower maternal education and income were associated with higher prevalence of pre-pregnancy T1DM but lower prevalence of pre-pregnancy T2DM and GDM. CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic variables largely accounted for the increased secular trend in pre-pregnancy T1DM and GDM, but the prevalence of pre-pregnancy T2DM still doubled, which was independent of socioeconomic covariates.

Effect of maternal pregestational diabetes mellitus on congenital heart diseases.

BACKGROUND: The increasing population of diabetes mellitus in adolescent girls and women of childbearing age contributes to a large number of pregnancies with maternal pregestational diabetes mellitus. Congenital heart diseases are a common adverse outcome in mothers with pregestational diabetes mellitus. However, there is little systematic information between maternal pregestational diabetes mellitus and congenital heart diseases in the offspring. DATA SOURCES: Literature selection was performed in PubMed. One hundred and seven papers were cited in our review, including 36 clinical studies, 26 experimental studies, 31 reviews, eight meta-analysis articles, and six of other types. RESULTS: Maternal pregestational diabetes mellitus poses a high risk of congenital heart diseases in the offspring and causes variety of phenotypes of congenital heart diseases. Factors such as persistent maternal hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, polymorphism of uncoupling protein 2, polymorphism of adiponectin gene, Notch 1 pathway, Nkx2.5 disorders, dysregulation of the hypoxia-inducible factor 1, and viral etiologies are associated with the occurrence of congenital heart diseases in the offspring of mothers with pregestational diabetes mellitus. Treatment options including blood sugar-reducing, anti-oxidative stress drug supplements and exercise can help to prevent maternal pregestational diabetes mellitus from inducing congenital heart diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Our review contributes to a better understanding of the association between maternal pregestational diabetes mellitus and congenital heart diseases in the offspring and to a profound thought of the mechanism, preventive and therapeutic measurements of congenital heart diseases caused by maternal pregestational diabetes mellitus.

Understanding Food Security as a Social Determinant of Diabetes-Related Health during Pregnancy.

Gestational and pregestational diabetes during pregnancy are substantial and growing public health issues. Low-income individuals and individuals who identify as racial and ethnic minorities are disproportionately affected. Food security, which is defined as the degree to which individuals have capacity to access and obtain food, is at the center of nutritional resources and decisions for individuals with diabetes. While increasingly recognized as an important mediator of health disparities in the United States, food insecurity is understudied during pregnancy and specifically among pregnant individuals with diabetes, for whom the impact of food-related resources may be even greater. Previous research has suggested that food insecurity is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnoses and disease exacerbation in the general adult population. An emerging body of research has suggested that food insecurity during pregnancy is associated with gestational diabetes mellitus diagnoses and adverse diabetes-related outcomes. Additionally, food insecurity during pregnancy may be associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Future research and clinical work should aim to further examine these relationships and subsequently develop evidence-based interventions to improve diabetes-related outcomes among pregnant individuals with food insecurity. The purpose of this article is to offer a working definition of food security, briefly review issues of food insecurity and diabetes, summarize research on food insecurity and diabetes-related pregnancy health, and discuss clinical recommendations and areas for future investigation. KEY POINTS: · Research on food insecurity and diabetes-related health is limited.. · The impact of food security on diabetes management and obstetric outcomes is likely significant.. · Future work to evaluate perinatal food security screening is warranted..