Classification, hepatotoxic mechanisms, and targets of the risk ingredients in traditional Chinese medicine-induced liver injury.

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has become a crucial cause of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Differ from chemical medicines, TCM feature more complex and mostly indefinite components. This review aimed to clarify the classification, underlying mechanisms and targets of the risk components in TCM-induced liver injury to further guide the secure application of TCM. Relevant studies or articles published on the PubMed database from January 2008 to December 2019 were searched. Based on the different chemical structures of the risk ingredients in TCM, they are divided into alkaloids, glycosides, toxic proteins, terpenoids and lactones, anthraquinones, and heavy metals. According to whether drug metabolism is activated or hepatocytes are directly attacked during TCM-induced liver injury, the high-risk substances can be classified into metabolic activation, non-metabolic activation, and mixed types. Mechanisms of the hepatotoxic ingredients in TCM-induced hepatotoxicity, including cytochrome P450 (CYP450) induction, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative damage, apoptosis, and idiosyncratic reaction, were also summarized. The targets involved in the risk ingredient-induced hepatocellular injury mainly include metabolic enzymes, nuclear receptors, transporters, and signaling pathways. Our periodic review and summary on the risk signals of TCM-induced liver injury must be beneficial to the integrated analysis on the multi-component, multi-target, and multi-effect characteristics of TCM-induced hepatotoxicity.

Histologic pattern is better correlated with clinical outcomes than biochemical classification in patients with drug-induced liver injury.

Histologically, drug-induced liver injury could be classified into acute hepatitis, chronic hepatitis, acute cholestasis, chronic cholestasis, and cholestatic hepatitis. The correlation between these histologic patterns and long-term clinical outcomes has not been well established. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to investigate the association of histologic patterns and long-term clinical outcomes defined as biochemical normalization, persistent abnormal liver biochemistry or death at designated time points. In this study, biochemical classification was determined by R-values; histologic injury pattern was determined by morphological features. Predictive ability of clinical outcomes by these two classifications was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves. Logistic regression was performed to identify histologic factors associated with outcomes. Totally, 88 patients with drug-induced liver injury were included for final analysis. Biochemical and histologic classification were consistent in 50 (57%) cases. 53 (60%) cases showed biochemical normalization within 6 months, and a further 11 (13%), 16 (18%), and 6 (7%) cases within 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Compared with biochemical classification, histologic injury pattern had better predictive ability for abnormal biochemistry at 6 months (Areas under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves 0.92 versus 0.60, P < 0.001) and 1 year (Areas under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves 0.94 versus 0.69, P < 0.001). Interlobular bile duct loss in >25% portal areas was independently associated with abnormal biochemistry at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. In conclusion, histologic injury pattern is better correlated with clinical outcome at 6 months and 1 year than biochemical classification. Moderate bile duct loss is an important histologic feature associated with persistent biochemical abnormality at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years.

Fulminant hepatic failure caused by herbal supplies

The consumption of botanicals for therapeutic purposes has increased significantly in recent years. Drug-induced liver disease (DILI) is a frequent cause of acute liver injury, around 50% in the United States, and about 1% is secondary to the use of phytotherapeuticals and herbal supplies. Ruellia bahiensis, a plant species of the Acanthaceae family, is a tropical plant distributed in Northeastern Brazil. In folk medicine in the state of Bahia, the species is known as "mãe-boa" and is commonly used. L.S.S, a 23-year old, female, patient was admitted at University Hospital of Bahia-Brazil with signs and symptoms of acute hepatitis. She had made daily use of an herbal supply popularly known as "mãe-boa" for at least two years prescribed by a physician. Diagnostic investigation was negative for viral and autoimmune hepatitis, leptospirosis, dengue, and CMV (cytomegalovirus). The patient had to undergo liver transplantation. Explant revealed massive hepatic necrosis. According to histological findings, and after exclusion of other etiologies, liver damage was assigned to herbal supply. The prolonged use of Ruellia bahiensis infusions may have caused the liver dysfunction.

Drug-, herb- and dietary supplement-induced liver injury. / El hígado y la toxicidad por drogas, hierbas y suplementos dietéticos.

Drug- and substance-induced liver injury accounts for approximately 20% of pediatric cases of acute liver failure. It is caused by two mechanisms: direct and idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity. Direct hepatotoxicity is the result of the administration of a drug with intrinsic toxicity and is dose-dependent (e.g., acetaminophen). Idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity is unpredictable, uncommon, variable in presentation, and doseindependent. The clinical, histological, and laboratory manifestations include hepatitis, which is generally asymptomatic but with a significant increase of liver enzymes; cholestasis, accompanied with jaundice, pruritus, prominent elevation of alkaline phosphatase, and mild elevation of aminotransferases; or mixed, with elements of both hepatitis and cholestasis. Time to recovery is variable, depending on the type of liver injury. Early detection and discontinuation of the causative drug is the most effective and important step for the fast resolution of histological and clinical changes, thus reducing severe liver injury.

El daño hepático por drogas y sustancias representa, aproximadamente, el 20% de los casos de falla hepática aguda en niños. Está causada por dos mecanismos: hepatotoxicidad directa y por idiosincrasia. La primera surge de la administración de una droga con toxicidad intrínseca y es dependiente de la dosis (ejemplo: acetaminofén). La idiosincrasia es impredecible, ocurre con baja frecuencia, es variable en su presentación y no depende de la dosis. Las manifestaciones clínicas, histológicas y de laboratorio son hepatitis, en general, asintomática, con gran aumento de enzimas hepáticas; colestasis, con ictericia, prurito, aumento predominante de fosfatasa alcalina y leve aumento de aminotransferasas; o mixto, hepatitis más colestasis. El tiempo de recuperación es variable, ya que depende del tipo de daño hepático. La detección temprana y la suspensión precoz de la droga son las intervenciones más eficaces e importantes para acelerar la resolución histológica y clínica, y reducir el daño hepático grave.

Associations of gender and a proxy of female menopausal status with histological features of drug-induced liver injury.

BACKGROUND & AIM: Gender and menopause may contribute to type and severity of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) by influencing host responses to injury. The aim of this study was to assess the associations of gender and female age 50 [a proxy of menopause] with histological features of liver injury in 212 adults enrolled in the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) registry. METHODS: All participants had a causality score of at least 'probable', a liver biopsy within 30 days of DILI onset, and no prior chronic liver disease. Biochemical and histological injury types were classified as hepatocellular or cholestatic/mixed injury. The cohort was divided into three gender/age categories: men (41.0%), women <50 years (27.4%) and women ≥50 years of age (31.6%). Interaction of gender and age category (≥50 or not) was assessed. RESULTS: Hepatocellular injury was more prevalent in women <50 years vs. others (P=.002). After adjusting for biochemical injury types, black race and possible ageing effects, more severe interface hepatitis was noted in biopsies of women <50 years compared to those of men and women ≥50 years (P=.009 and P=.055 respectively). Compared to those of men, biopsies of women showed greater plasma cell infiltration, hepatocyte apoptosis, hepatocyte rosettes and lobular disarray but less iron-positive hepatocytes and histological cholestasis (P<.05). These associations persisted after excluding cases of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, anabolic steroids or nitrofurantoin DILI which showed gender-specific distributions. CONCLUSION: Gender and a proxy of menopause were associated with various features of inflammation and injury in DILI.

RUCAM in Drug and Herb Induced Liver Injury: The Update.

RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) or its previous synonym CIOMS (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences) is a well established tool in common use to quantitatively assess causality in cases of suspected drug induced liver injury (DILI) and herb induced liver injury (HILI). Historical background and the original work confirm the use of RUCAM as single term for future cases, dismissing now the term CIOMS for reasons of simplicity and clarity. RUCAM represents a structured, standardized, validated, and hepatotoxicity specific diagnostic approach that attributes scores to individual key items, providing final quantitative gradings of causality for each suspect drug/herb in a case report. Experts from Europe and the United States had previously established in consensus meetings the first criteria of RUCAM to meet the requirements of clinicians and practitioners in care for their patients with suspected DILI and HILI. RUCAM was completed by additional criteria and validated, assisting to establish the timely diagnosis with a high degree of certainty. In many countries and for more than two decades, physicians, regulatory agencies, case report authors, and pharmaceutical companies successfully applied RUCAM for suspected DILI and HILI. Their practical experience, emerging new data on DILI and HILI characteristics, and few ambiguous questions in domains such alcohol use and exclusions of non-drug causes led to the present update of RUCAM. The aim was to reduce interobserver and intraobserver variability, to provide accurately defined, objective core elements, and to simplify the handling of the items. We now present the update of the well accepted original RUCAM scale and recommend its use for clinical, regulatory, publication, and expert purposes to validly establish causality in cases of suspected DILI and HILI, facilitating a straightforward application and an internationally harmonized approach of causality assessment as a common basic tool.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury.

CONTEXT: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) represents a diverse set of responses following exposure to any manufactured or naturally occurring chemical compound. Drug-induced liver injury is of major concern owing to the ever increasing number of compounds introduced into the market for treatment of various diseases as well as the increasing popularity of herbals, which lend themselves to self-medication but are not rigorously regulated. OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the prevalence, classification, and diagnosis of DILI with emphasis on pathogenesis and the role of a liver biopsy. To focus on the most common, emerging, and herbal agents that cause DILI with emphasis on the histologic pattern of injury observed. DATA SOURCES: A review of the literature was drawn from the PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) repository, textbooks, and online databases. All figures were taken from cases seen at our tertiary referral center, which is 1 of 12 participating sites in the National Institutes of Health-funded Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network. CONCLUSIONS: Drug-induced liver injury due to prescription, over-the-counter, and herbal products is a major cause of liver disease in the United States and around the world. Diagnosis of DILI is challenging because there is no single clinical, laboratory, or histologic feature specific to DILI. Accurate diagnosis requires establishing a causal relationship with the suspected agent and excluding competing causes of liver injury. The liver biopsy is an essential component in the management of DILI by offering clues to the underlying pathogenesis, providing prognostic information, and guiding therapy.

Comparison of Liver Biopsy Findings with the Digestive Disease Week Japan 2004 Scale for Diagnosis of Drug-Induced Liver Injury.

The liver biopsy remains a valuable tool in the diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). The Digestive Disease Week Japan 2004 (DDW-J) scale proposed as an objective tool for the diagnosis of DILI has been widely used in Japan. So far, the histological features have not been compared with DDW-J scale in detail. Herein, we examined the correlation between liver biopsy findings and clinical features, particularly DDW-J scales. A total of 80 patients with liver injuries of unknown cause were enrolled. Based on the histological findings, these cases were categorized into 3 groups: A (DILI was strongly suspected), B (DILI was suspected), and C (DILI should be considered in the differential diagnosis). Histological groups and DDW-J scale were moderately correlated (κ = 0.60). The mean total DDW-J scale scores were as follows: 4.89 for A, 3.26 for B, and 0.75 for C (p < 0.05). While hepatocellular type was coincided in a majority of cases by histological and DDW-J scale evaluation, cholestatic type was not well coincided. In conclusion, biopsy findings and DDW-J scale were well correlated, and the hepatocellular type of liver injuries was well coincided by both evaluations, though there were several discrepant cases, particularly in cholestatic type.

Construction and analysis of a human hepatotoxicity database suitable for QSAR modeling using post-market safety data.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the most common drug-induced adverse events (AEs) leading to life-threatening conditions such as acute liver failure. It has also been recognized as the single most common cause of safety-related post-market withdrawals or warnings. Efforts to develop new predictive methods to assess the likelihood of a drug being a hepatotoxicant have been challenging due to the complexity and idiosyncrasy of clinical manifestations of DILI. The FDA adverse event reporting system (AERS) contains post-market data that depict the morbidity of AEs. Here, we developed a scalable approach to construct a hepatotoxicity database using post-market data for the purpose of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling. A set of 2029 unique and modelable drug entities with 13,555 drug-AE combinations was extracted from the AERS database using 37 hepatotoxicity-related query preferred terms (PTs). In order to determine the optimal classification scheme to partition positive from negative drugs, a manually-curated DILI calibration set composed of 105 negatives and 177 positives was developed based on the published literature. The final classification scheme combines hepatotoxicity-related PT data with supporting information that optimize the predictive performance across the calibration set. Data for other toxicological endpoints related to liver injury such as liver enzyme abnormalities, cholestasis, and bile duct disorders, were also extracted and classified. Collectively, these datasets can be used to generate a battery of QSAR models that assess a drug's potential to cause DILI.

Pathogenesis of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury and clinical perspectives.

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare disease that develops independently of drug dose, route, or duration of administration. Furthermore, idiosyncratic DILI is not a single disease entity but rather a spectrum of rare diseases with varying clinical, histological, and laboratory features. The pathogenesis of DILI is not fully understood. Standardization of the DILI nomenclature and methods to assess causality, along with the information provided by the LiverTox Web site, will harmonize and accelerate research on DILI. Studies of new serum biomarkers such as glutamate dehydrogenase, high mobility group box protein 1, and microRNA-122 could provide information for use in diagnosis and prognosis and provide important insights into the mechanisms of the pathogenesis of DILI. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the HLA region have been associated with idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity attributed to flucloxacillin, ximelagatran, lapatinib, and amoxicillin-clavulanate. However, genome-wide association studies of pooled cases have not associated any genetic factors with idiosyncratic DILI. Whole genome and whole exome sequencing analyses are under way to study cases of DILI attributed to a single medication. Serum proteomic, transcriptome, and metabolome as well as intestinal microbiome analyses will increase our understanding of the mechanisms of this disorder. Further improvements to in vitro and in vivo test systems should advance our understanding of the causes, risk factors, and mechanisms of idiosyncratic DILI.

CORAL: binary classifications (active/inactive) for Liver-Related Adverse Effects of Drugs.

Classification data related to the Liver-Related Adverse Effects of Drugs have been studied with the CORAL software (http://www.insilico.eu/coral). Two datasets which contain compounds with two serum enzyme markers of liver toxicity: alanine aminotransferase (ALT, n=187) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST, n=209) are analyzed. Statistical quality of the prediction for ALT activity is n=35, Sensitivity = 0.5556, Specificity = 0.8077, and Accuracy = 0.7429. In the case of AST activity the prediction is characterized by n=42, Sensitivity = 0.6875, Specificity = 0.7692, and Accuracy = 0.7381. A number of structural alerts which can be related to the studied activities are revealed. It is the first attempt to build up the classification QSAR model by means of the Monte Carlo technique based on representation of the molecular structure by SMILES using the CORAL software.

Hepatic injury to the newborn liver due to drugs.

The result of the use of drugs in the newborn may be strongly influenced by the peculiar state of the neonate, characterized by the immaturity, at birth, of the processes controlling the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of drugs. Additional important factors that may affect drugs' bioavailability and toxicity are gestational age, birth weight, intrauterine growth restriction, gender and, especially, liver function immaturity. Because of the high susceptibility to infections, antibiotics, in particular ampicillin and gentamicin, are the most widely used drugs in newborns. Erythromycin is often used for the therapy of gastrointestinal dismotility, while azithromycin has been proposed for the prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, like indomethacin, are administered on the first days of life to close the patent ductus arteriosus. All these drugs have been proved to can give rise to hepatotoxicity. The acute and chronic liver toxicity due to the most widely used drugs in the neonates will be here reviewed.

Drug-induced liver disease.

More than 1000 drugs have been associated with hepatic injury, which can present in all forms of acute and chronic liver disease. The identification and prevention of drug-induced liver disease remain challenging tasks for health care professionals as reliable and practical assessment tools are not currently available to diagnose drug-induced liver disease. The management of drug-induced liver injury is generally supportive, and the recognition and avoidance of causative agents remain the most effective strategy for positive clinical outcomes.

Hepatic safety of voriconazole after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Voriconazole is increasingly used in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for prophylaxis and treatment of fungal infections. Hepatic dysfunction is common in patients undergoing HSCT and may have an impact on the clinical decision to institute voriconazole. We conducted a retrospective review of all adult and pediatric HSCT recipients who received >2 consecutive doses of voriconazole between January 2005 and February 2008. Clinical hepatotoxicity was defined as the subjective attribution of liver enzyme elevation (even a mild one) to hepatotoxicity because of voriconazole by the treating physician and leading to discontinuation of voriconazole. Biochemical hepatotoxicity was defined as an elevation in one or more liver enzymes to >3 times the upper limit of normal or >3 times the baseline value if abnormal at baseline. Liver enzymes assessed included aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin. Simple and multiple logistic regressions were used to define the risks for hepatic dysfunction. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess the differences in liver function test values before, during, and after the use of voriconazole. Sixty-eight of 200 patients (34%) developed hepatotoxicity while on voriconazole. The median duration of voriconazole therapy was 72 days (range, 1-804 days). Biochemical hepatotoxicity occurred in 51 patients (75%); clinical hepatotoxicity, in 17 patients (25%). Thirty-five (51%) of the patients with hepatotoxicity required discontinuation of therapy. In simple logistic regression, acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was a risk factor for hepatotoxicity, and receipt of a T-cell depleted allograft was protective. In multiple logistic regression, acute GVHD (P = .002) remained significant. There were no cases of liver failure or death attributed to voriconazole. In this cohort of patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT, the rate of hepatotoxicity while on voriconazole was 34%. In general, the hepatic dysfunction was mild and reversible. Voriconazole therapy with monitoring appears to be reasonably safe for use in HSCT recipients at high risk for invasive fungal infections.

[Hepatotoxicity of drugs and chemicals]. / Foie, médicaments et agents chimiques.

Hepatotoxicity of xenobiotics, which include classical drugs, herbal medicines, and chemical products, represents an important cause of liver diseases. Drug hepatotoxicity exhibits various expressions, practically reproducing all non-iatrogenic liver diseases. Drug hepatitis is the main cause of liver failure, in particular with paracetamol overdosage (near 50 %). Idiosyncratic hepatitis, which are unpredictable, also represent an important cause with a frequency similar to those of viral hepatitis. More than 1200 drugs are recorded as potential hepatotoxics. Causality assessment relies on chronological and clinical criteria and is frequently difficult. Herbal medicines are an increasing cause of liver injury with a large clinical polymorphism as classical drugs. About 50 plants are known to be hepatotoxic. Diagnosis is even more difficult because of frequent auto-medication and purchase via Internet. Chemical products are also responsible of various liver injuries through variable routes of exposition: inhalation of volatile products, ingestion of contaminating product, percutaneous contamination. Their role is particularly difficult to assess because exposure is frequently unknown or intermittent or accidental. Liver reaction may occur a long time after exposure, further increasing difficulties of identification. Several tens of chemicals may be involved. There is no specific treatment for xenobiotic hepatotoxicity, once liver injury as occurred apart paracetamol overdosage. The main measure consists to discontinue this exposition to the responsible compounds to avoid an aggravation of liver injury.

Diagnosis, management and prevention of drug-induced liver injury.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is increasingly being recognised as a significant cause of both acute and chronic liver disease. The most commonly implicated agents are paracetamol, antimicrobials, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, statins, isoniazid and herbal remedies. Drug-induced hepatotoxicity is generally idiosyncratic in nature. The pathogenesis of DILI remains enigmatic, but involves exposure to the toxic agent, mitochondrial injury, failure of adaptation, and innate and adaptive immune responses. Diagnosis of drug-induced liver diseases can be difficult, but the key to causality is to diligently exclude other causes of liver injury, and to identify a characteristic clinical drug-related signature. Management of drug-induced liver injury is symptomatic, with early referral to a liver transplant unit at the first hint of liver failure, especially in those with non-paracetamol-induced liver injury. Prevention of drug hepatotoxicity includes increased vigilance during pre-clinical drug development and clinical trials, alanine aminotransferase monitoring with certain drugs, better marketing strategies, and the future identification of both diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers.

Uniform procedure of (1)H NMR analysis of rat urine and toxicometabonomics Part II: comparison of NMR profiles for classification of hepatotoxicity.

A procedure of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) urinalysis using pattern recognition is proposed for early detection of toxicity of investigational compounds in rats. The method is applied to detect toxicity upon administration of 13 toxic reference compounds and one nontoxic control compound (mianserine) in rats. The toxic compounds are expected to induce necrosis (bromobenzene, paracetamol, carbon tetrachloride, iproniazid, isoniazid, thioacetamide), cholestasis (alpha-naphthylisothiocyanate (ANIT), chlorpromazine, ethinylestradiol, methyltestosterone, ibuprofen), or steatosis (phenobarbital, tetracycline). Animals were treated daily for 2 or 4 days except for paracetamol and bromobenzene (1 and 2 days) and carbon tetrachloride (1 day only). Urine was collected 24 h after the first and second treatment. The animals were sacrificed 24 h after the last treatment, and NMR data were compared with liver histopathology as well as blood and urine biochemistry. Pathology and biochemistry showed marked toxicity in the liver at high doses of bromobenzene, paracetamol, carbon tetrachloride, ANIT, and ibuprofen. Thioacetamide and chlorpromazine showed less extensive changes, while the influences of iproniazid, isoniazid, phenobarbital, ethinylestradiol, and tetracycline on the toxic parameters were marginal or for methyltestosterone and mianserine negligible. NMR spectroscopy revealed significant changes upon dosing in 88 NMR biomarker signals preselected with the Procrustus Rotation method on principal component discriminant analysis (PCDA) plots. Further evaluation of the specific changes led to the identification of biomarker patterns for the specific types of liver toxicity. Comparison of our rat NMR PCDA data with histopathological changes reported in humans and/or rats suggests that rat NMR urinalysis can be used to predict hepatotoxicity.

[Comparison and analysis of two international diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of 230 cases with drug-induced liver injury].

OBJECTIVE: To compare and analyze the accuracy of two diagnostic criteria of drug-induced liver injuries. METHODS: 230 cases of drug-induced liver injury diagnosed clinically in the 302 hospital of PLA were retrospectively studied. The drugs which induced liver injuries were summarized and analyzed. Danan's international consensus criteria and Maria's diagnostic scale were applied to diagnose these 230 cases again and then the differences of diagnostic results were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: The drugs which induced liver injuries in the 230 patients were arranged in order of their usage frequencies: traditional Chinese herbs and the like, antibiotics, antipyretic analgesics, antituberculosis medicines, cardiovascular drugs, over-the-counter health stuff, psychopharmaceuticals, dermatological agents, drug for diabetes, tapazol, and others. Based on the 230 adult inpatients with drug-induced liver injury, according to Danan's international consensus criteria, 149 cases (64.8%), 71 (30.9%) and 10 (4.3%) were classified as drug-related, indeterminate and drug-unrelated respectively; according to Maria's diagnostic scale, not one was a definite drug-induced liver injury, 55 cases (23.9%) were probable, while 126 (54.8%), 33 (14.3%) and 16 (7.0%) were possible, unlikely and excluded respectively. CONCLUSION: The accordance rate of Danan's international consensus criteria and clinical diagnosis was higher than that of Maria's diagnostic scale. Neverthelessìthe current diagnostic methods for drug-induced liver injury need to be revised for clinical practice.