Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 107
Filtrar
1.
Can J Surg ; 63(5): E475-E482, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33107818

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: American studies have shown that higher provider and hospital volumes are associated with reduced risk of mortality following colorectal surgical interventions. Evidence from Canada is limited, and to our knowledge only a single study has considered outcomes other than death. We describe associations between provider surgical volume and all-cause mortality and postoperative complications following colorectal surgical interventions in New Brunswick. METHODS: We used hospital discharge abstracts linked to vital statistics, the provincial cancer registry and patient registry data. We considered all admissions for colorectal surgeries from 2007 through 2013. We used logistic regression to identify odds of dying and odds of complications (from any of anastomosis leak, unplanned colostomy, intra-abdominal sepsis or pneumonia) within 30 days of discharge from hospital according to provider volume (i.e., total interventions performed over the preceding 2 years) adjusted for personal, contextual, provider and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 9170 interventions were performed by 125 providers across 18 hospitals. We found decreased odds of experiencing a complication following colorectal surgery per increment of 10 interventions performed per year (odds ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.91-0.96). We found no associations with mortality. Associations remained consistent across models restricted to cancer patients or to interventions performed by general surgeons and across models that also considered overall hospital volumes. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that increased caseloads are associated with reduced odds of complications, but not with all-cause mortality, following colorectal surgery in New Brunswick. We also found no evidence of volume having differential effects on outcomes from colon and rectal procedures.


CONTEXTE: Des études américaines ont montré que le volume d'activité des chirurgiens et des hôpitaux est inversement proportionnel au risque de mortalité après la chirurgie colorectale. Les données pour le Canada sont limitées, et à notre connaissance, une seule étude a porté sur d'autres paramètres que le décès. Nous avons décrit les liens entre volume d'activité des chirurgiens et mortalité de toute cause/complications postopératoires après la chirurgie colorectale au Nouveau-Brunswick. MÉTHODES: Nous avons utilisé les registres de congés des hôpitaux reliés aux données de la Statistique de l'état civil, du registre provincial du cancer et du registre des patients. Nous avons recensé toutes les admissions pour chirurgie colorectale de 2007 à 2013. Nous avons utilisé la régression logistique pour établir le risque de décès et le risque de complications (fuite anastomotique, colostomie non planifiée, infection intra-abdominale ou pneumonie) dans les 30 jours suivant le congé de l'hôpital par rapport au volume d'activité des chirurgiens (c.-à-d., interventions totales des 2 années précédentes) ajusté en fonction des caractéristiques individuelles et contextuelles, propres aux chirurgiens et aux hôpitaux. RÉSULTATS: En tout, 125 chirurgiens ont effectué 9170 interventions dans 18 hôpitaux. Nous avons observé un risque moindre de complications après la chirurgie colorectale pour chaque palier de 10 interventions effectuées annuellement (risque relatif 0,94, intervalle de confiance de 95 %, 0,91­0,96). Nous n'avons observé aucun lien avec la mortalité. Les liens sont demeurés constants, peu importe que les modèles soient restreints aux patients cancéreux ou aux interventions effectuées par des chirurgiens généraux et entre les modèles qui tenaient également compte du volume global d'activité des hôpitaux. CONCLUSION: Selon nos résultats, l'augmentation du volume d'activité est associée à un risque moindre de complications, mais n'a pas de lien avec la mortalité de toute cause après la chirurgie colorectale au Nouveau-Brunswick. Nous n'avons pas non plus constaté de lien entre le volume d'activité et l'issue différentielle de la chirurgie du côlon et du rectum.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Colon/cirugía , Enfermedades del Colon/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Bajo Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nuevo Brunswick/epidemiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Recto/cirugía , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
World J Emerg Surg ; 15(1): 22, 2020 03 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32216810

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pre-operative kidney function is known to be associated with surgical outcomes. However, in emergency surgery, the pre-operative kidney function may reflect chronic kidney disease (CKD) or acute kidney injury (AKI). We examined the association of pre-operative CKD and/or AKI with in-hospital outcomes of emergency colorectal surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including adult patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery in 38 Japanese hospitals between 2010 and 2017. We classified patients into five groups according to the pre-operative status of CKD (defined as baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or recorded diagnosis of CKD), AKI (defined as admission serum creatinine value/baseline serum creatinine value ≥ 1.5), and end-stage renal disease (ESRD): (i) CKD(-)AKI(-), (ii) CKD(-)AKI(+), (iii) CKD(+)AKI(-), (iv) CKD(+)AKI(+), and (v) ESRD groups. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, while secondary outcomes included use of vasoactive drugs, mechanical ventilation, blood transfusion, post-operative renal replacement therapy, and length of hospital stay. We compared these outcomes among the five groups, followed by a multivariable logistic regression analysis for in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: We identified 3002 patients with emergency colorectal surgery (mean age 70.3 ± 15.4 years, male 54.5%). The in-hospital mortality was 8.6% (169/1963), 23.8% (129/541), 15.3% (52/340), 28.8% (17/59), and 32.3% (32/99) for CKD(-)AKI(-), CKD(-)AKI(+), CKD(+)AKI(-), CKD(+)AKI(+), and ESRD, respectively. Other outcomes such as blood transfusion and post-operative renal replacement therapy showed similar trends. Compared to the CKD(-)AKI(-) group, the adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for in-hospital mortality was 2.54 (1.90-3.40), 1.29 (0.90-1.85), 2.86 (1.54-5.32), and 2.76 (1.55-4.93) for CKD(-)AKI(+), CKD(+)AKI(-), CKD(+)AKI(+), and ESRD groups, respectively. Stratified by baseline eGFR (> 90, 60-89, 30-59, and < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and AKI status, the crude in-hospital mortality and adjusted odds ratio increased in patients with baseline eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 among patients without AKI, while these were constantly high regardless of baseline eGFR among patients with AKI. Additional analysis restricting to 2162 patients receiving the surgery on the day of hospital admission showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The differentiation of pre-operative CKD and AKI, especially the identification of AKI, is useful for risk stratification in patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Anciano , Enfermedades del Colon/mortalidad , Urgencias Médicas , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Japón , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Med Sci Monit ; 25: 5408-5417, 2019 Jul 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31326976

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common type of primary gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor, but GISTs arising in the anus and rectum are rare. This study aimed to undertake a population-based analysis of the incidence, patient demographics, and survival of patients with anorectal GIST compared with patients with GIST arising from other sites based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database. MATERIAL AND METHODS The SEER database was used to identify all patients diagnosed with GIST and patients diagnosed with anorectal GIST from 2000 to 2015. The incidence of GIST, baseline clinical and demographic data, tumor stage, and patient survival data were analyzed, including overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS A total of 277 patients with anorectal GIST were identified, with an incidence of 0.018 per 100,000. The incidence of GIST arising from other sites was 0.719 per 100,000. The median age at diagnosis for anorectal GIST was 57.5 years (range, 26-92 years), median tumor size was 6.55 cm (range, 0.6-20 cm), and surgery, but not chemotherapy, improved OS and CSS. Patients with anorectal GIST had a mean 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10year OS of 91.1%, 82.5%, 75.2%, and 58.5%, respectively. Patients with GIST arising at other sites had a mean 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS of 88.3%, 76.4%, 66.5%, and 46.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Anorectal GIST is a rare tumor that has a better outcome compared with GISTs arising at other sites in the gastrointestinal tract.


Asunto(s)
Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/patología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Recto/patología , Programa de VERF , Análisis de Supervivencia
4.
Colorectal Dis ; 21(10): 1112-1119, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31074574

RESUMEN

AIM: In patients who have undergone a polypectomy of a malignant rectal polyp without histopathological risk factors other than an involved or unclear resection margin, additional local excision is often performed. Evidence to support this approach is lacking. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the outcome in terms of local recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of additional local excision following incomplete polypectomy for low risk T1 rectal cancer. METHODS: A comprehensive search for published studies was performed. Only studies in which there was incomplete (or ≤ 1 mm) removal of pT1 rectal polyps or in which the resection plane could not be assessed were included. For each included study data on tumour stage, histological factors, surgical technique, local recurrence rate, 5-year DFS and 5-year OS were extracted. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42017062702. RESULTS: A total of 580 studies were retrieved by the search in the MEDLINE database, Embase and the Cochrane Library. After careful appreciation, four studies were included in the analysis, comprising 102 patients of whom the majority had undeterminable (Rx) resection margins. Local excision via transanal endoscopic microsurgery was reported most frequently. Only 1% of patients developed a local recurrence. One study reported 5-year DFS and 5-year OS of 96% and 87% respectively. CONCLUSION: This study supports the use of additional local excision techniques for rectal cancer patients who underwent an incomplete polypectomy for a malignant rectal polyp in the absence of risk factors other than an uncertain resection margin.


Asunto(s)
Pólipos Intestinales/cirugía , Proctectomía/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Cirugía Endoscópica Transanal/mortalidad , Anciano , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Pólipos Intestinales/complicaciones , Pólipos Intestinales/mortalidad , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/etiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Proctectomía/métodos , Enfermedades del Recto/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Recto/etiología , Neoplasias del Recto/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Cirugía Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Surgery ; 165(5): 882-888, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30709587

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Risk-prediction indices are one category of the many tools implemented to guide efforts to decrease readmissions. However, using fied models to predict a complex process can prove challenging. In addition, no risk-prediction index has been developed for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Therefore, we evaluated the performance of a widely utilized simplified index developed at the hospital level - LACE (length of stay, acute admission, Charlson comorbidity index score, and emergency department visits) and developed and evaluated a novel index in predicting readmissions in this patient population. METHODS: Using a retrospective split-sample cohort, patients discharged after colorectal surgery were identified within the inpatient databases of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project for the states of New York, California, and Florida (2006-2014). The primary outcome was death or readmission within 30 days after discharge. Multivariable logistic regression models incorporated patient comorbidities, postoperative complications, and hospitalization details, and were evaluated using the C statistic. RESULTS: A total of 440,742 patients met eligibility criteria. The rate of death or readmission within 30 days after discharge was 14.0% (n = 61,757). When applied to surgical patients, the LACE index demonstrated a poor model fit (C = 0.631). The model fit improved significantly-but remained poor (C = 0.654; P < .001)-with the addition of the following variables, which are known to be associated with readmission after colorectal surgery: age, indication for surgery, and creation of a new ostomy. A novel, simplified model also yielded a poor model fit (C = 0.660). CONCLUSION: Postdischarge death or readmission after colorectal surgery is not accurately modeled using existing, modified, or novel simplified risk prediction models. Payers and providers must ensure that quality improvement efforts applying simplified models to complex processes, such as readmissions following colorectal surgery, may not be appropriate, and that models reflect the relevant patient population.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Anciano , Colon/cirugía , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Pronóstico , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
6.
Scand J Surg ; 108(2): 137-143, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30178717

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Over the past decades, laparoscopic colorectal surgery has become widely used for various indications. Large multicenter studies have demonstrated that laparoscopy has clear advantages over open surgery. Compared to open procedures, laparoscopy decreases perioperative blood loss, post-operative pain, and hospitalization time, but provides equivalent long-term oncological and surgical results. Most studies have been conducted in high-volume institutions with selected patients, which may have influenced the reported outcome of laparoscopy. Here, we investigated the primary outcome of all laparoscopic colorectal resections performed between 2005 and 2015 in a low-volume center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included bowel resections performed between 2005 and 2015 in the Lapland Central Hospital. Data were retrieved from electronic patient registries, and all operations that began as a laparoscopy were included. Patient records were investigated to determine the primary surgical outcome and possible complications within the first 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: During 2005-2015, 385 laparoscopic colorectal resections were performed. Indications included benign (n = 166 patients, 43.1%) and malignant lesions (n = 219 cases, 56.9%). The median patient age was 68 years, and 50.4% were male. The median American Society of Anesthesiologist score was III, and 48.5% of patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologist class of III or IV. The median hospital stay after surgery was 6 days (interquartile range: 3.8). The conversion rate to open surgery rate was 13%. The total surgical complication rate was 24.2%, and re-operation was required in 11.2% of patients. A total of 26 patients had anastomotic leakage, of which 16 required re-operations. The 30-day mortality was 0.8%. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that laparoscopic colorectal surgery in a peripheral hospital resulted in primary outcome rates within the range of those reported in previous multicenter trials. Therefore, the routine use of laparoscopic colorectal resections with high-quality outcome is feasible in small and peripheral surgical units.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Proctectomía/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades del Colon/mortalidad , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta , Femenino , Finlandia , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 42(3): 157-163, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30314765

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: (1) To evaluate the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of patients after colorectal stent placement and (2) to assess the safety and efficacy of the stents for the resolution of colorectal obstruction according to the insertion technique. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study which included 177 patients with colonic obstruction who underwent insertion of a stent. RESULTS: A total of 196 stents were implanted in 177 patients. Overall, the most common cause of obstruction was colorectal cancer (89.3%). Ninety-two stents (47%) were placed by radiologic technique and 104 (53%) by endoscopy under fluoroscopic guidance. Technical success rates were 95% in both groups. Clinical success rates were 77% in the radiological group and 81% in the endoscopic group (p>0.05). The rate of complications was higher in the radiologic group compared with the endoscopic group (38% vs 20%, respectively; p=0.006). Among patients with colorectal cancer (158), 65 stents were placed for palliation but 30% eventually required surgery. The multivariate analysis identified three factors associated with poorer long-term survival: tumor stage IV, comorbidity and onset of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Stents may be an alternative to emergency surgery in colorectal obstruction, but the clinical outcome depends on the tumor stage, comorbidity and stent complications. The rate of definitive palliative stent placement was high; although surgery was eventually required in 30%. Our study suggests that the endoscopic method of stent placement is safer than the radiologic method.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/terapia , Obstrucción Intestinal/terapia , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Enfermedades del Recto/terapia , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Anciano , Enfermedades del Colon/etiología , Enfermedades del Colon/mortalidad , Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Constricción Patológica/complicaciones , Diverticulitis/complicaciones , Femenino , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Implantación de Prótesis/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Intervencional , Enfermedades del Recto/etiología , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 30(7): 722-726, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29659377

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anorectal complications are common in patients with haematological malignancies. OBJECTIVES: The objectives are to characterize anorectal complications in these patients, identify risk factors and shed light on treatment, morbidity and mortality rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective, observational study that included 83 inpatients with haematological malignancies and proctological symptoms from January 2010 to September 2015 was conducted. Clinical outcomes were obtained through a detailed review of medical records. RESULTS: The median age was 56 years, and 52 (62.7%) patients were men. Fifty-six (67.5%) patients had nonseptic anorectal complications and 27 (32.5%) patients had septic anorectal complications. RISKS FACTORS: Patients with septic anorectal complications were more commonly male, older, and had lower absolute neutrophil counts, but the differences were not statistically significant (P=0.79, 0.67 and 0.89, respectively). In positive blood cultures [23/70 (32.9%)], Enterococcus faecium, Klebsiella pneumonia, and Escherichia coli were the most common isolated agents. TREATMENT: In nonseptic anorectal complications, conservative treatments/minor proctological procedures were adopted, and patients with septic anorectal complications were treated with antibiotics±major proctological procedures and/or surgical drainage/debridement. RESULTS OF TREATMENT: Forty-eight (85.7%) patients in the nonseptic complications group improved compared with 23 (85.2%) patients in the septic complications group. The overall mortality rate was 2.4% (n=2), with one (1.2%) death related to perianal sepsis. CONCLUSION: Enterococcus spp. were more commonly identified in this study and can be increasing in this specific population. In contrast to other reports, we did not identify an association between septic anorectal complications and possible risk factors such as male sex, younger age or a low absolute neutrophil count. Most patients had nonseptic anorectal complications. A major proctological procedure/surgical debridement should always be applied in septic complications, which have better prognoses now than in the past.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Ano/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Recto/microbiología , Sepsis/microbiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades del Ano/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Ano/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Ano/terapia , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas/mortalidad , Infecciones Bacterianas/terapia , Desbridamiento , Drenaje , Femenino , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Recto/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Recto/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/mortalidad , Sepsis/terapia , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
9.
World J Surg ; 42(3): 866-875, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28871326

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The benefit of primary anastomosis (PA) without a diverting stoma over Hartmann's procedure (HP) for colorectal perforation remains controversial. We compared postoperative mortality and morbidity between HP and PA without a diverting stoma for colorectal perforation of various etiologies. METHODS: Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we extracted data on patients who underwent emergency open laparotomy for colorectal perforation of various etiologies from July 1, 2010 to March 31, 2014. We compared 30-day mortality, postoperative complication rates, and postoperative critical care interventions between HP and PA groups using propensity score matching, inverse probability of treatment weighting, and instrumental variable analyses to adjust for measured and unmeasured confounding factors. RESULTS: We identified 8500 eligible patients (5455 HP and 3045 PA). In the propensity score-matched model, a significant difference between the HP and PA groups was detected in 30-day mortality (7.7% vs. 9.6%; risk difference, 1.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-3.4). The inverse probability of treatment weighting showed similar results (8.8% vs. 10.7%; risk difference, 1.9%; 95% CI, 1.0-2.8). In the instrumental variable analysis, the point estimate suggested similar direction to that of the propensity score analyses (risk difference, 4.4%; 95% CI, -3.3 to 12.1). The PA group had significantly higher rates of secondary surgery for complications (4.6% vs. 8.4%; risk difference, 3.8%; 95% CI, 2.5-4.1) and slightly longer duration of postoperative critical care interventions. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a significant difference in 30-day mortality between HP and PA without a diverting stoma.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Colostomía , Ileostomía , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Recto/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Enfermedades del Colon/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Perforación Intestinal/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
10.
J Palliat Care ; 32(3-4): 92-100, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29113549

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Studies have reported overly aggressive end-of-life care (EOLC) in many cancers. We investigate trends in, and factors associated with, aggressive EOLC among patients who died of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: All patients with primary cause of death from esophageal, gastric, colon, and anorectal cancer from January 2003 to December 2013 were identified through the Ontario Cancer Registry, and information was collected from linked databases. Outcomes representing aggressive EOLC were assessed: administration of chemotherapy, any emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (all within 30 days of death), death in hospital and in ICU, and a composite outcome representing any aggressive EOLC. Temporal trends were analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage test. RESULTS: There were 34 630 patients in the cohort: 43% colon, 26% anorectal, 19% gastric, and 12% esophageal cancers. Aggressive EOLC was delivered to 65%, with a significantly decreasing trend from 64.8% in 2003 to 62.5% in 2013 ( P = .001). Utilization of specific elements of aggressive EOLC included 8% chemotherapy, 46% ED visits, 49% hospital admissions, 6% ICU admissions, 45% death in hospital, and 5% death in ICU. Trends over the study period showed that ED visits (from 43% to 46.9%; P = .0001) and death in ICU (from 3.7% to 4.9%; P = .04) significantly increased; hospital admissions (from 48.9% to 47.8%; P = .02) and death in hospital (from 46.6% to 38.9%; P < .0001) significantly decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of patients with GI cancer had aggressive EOLC in the last 30 days of life.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Cuidado Terminal/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias del Colon/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Femenino , Predicción , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario , Enfermedades del Recto/terapia
11.
Surgery ; 162(4): 880-890, 2017 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28803643

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although the relationship between laparoscopic surgery and improved clinical outcomes has been well established across a variety of procedures, the effect of operative experience with laparoscopic surgery remains less defined. The present study sought to assess the comparative benefit of laparoscopic colorectal surgery relative to surgeon volume. METHODS: Commercially insured patients aged 18 to 64 years undergoing a colorectal resection were identified using the MarketScan Database from 2010-2014. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to calculate and compare postoperative mortality/morbidity by operative approach relative to surgeon volume. RESULTS: A total of 21,827 patients were identified who met inclusion criteria. The median age among patients was 53 years (interquartile range: 46-59) with a slight majority of patients being female (n = 11,248, 51.5%). Laparoscopic operations were performed in 49.2% of patients (n = 10,756), whereas 50.7% (n = 11,071) underwent an open colorectal resection. On multivariable analysis, laparoscopic surgery was associated with 64% decreased odds of developing a postoperative complication or mortality (odds ratio = 0.36, 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.41, P < .001). Patients who underwent colectomy performed by a higher operative volume surgeon (high versus low: odds ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.77, P < .001) demonstrated decreased odds of developing a postoperative complication/mortality. Interestingly the potential decrease in risk-adjusted morbidity/mortality between laparoscopic and open surgery was somewhat greater among high-operative-volume surgeons (odds ratio = 0.29, 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.34, P < .001) and intermediate-operative-volume surgeons (odds ratio = 0.30, 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.36, P < .001) compared with low-operative-volume surgeons (odds ratio = 0.36, 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.41, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Although laparoscopic surgery was associated with improved postoperative clinical outcomes, the effect of laparoscopic surgery varied somewhat according to surgeon volume.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Colectomía , Enfermedades del Colon/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Colon/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Recto/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
12.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 96(2): e5818, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28079809

RESUMEN

Colorectal perforation has a high rate of mortality. We compared the incidence and fatality rates of colorectal perforation among different hospitals in Japan using data from the nationwide surgical database.Patients were registered in the National Clinical Database (NCD) between January 1st, 2011 and December 31st, 2013. Patients with colorectal perforation were identified from surgery records by examining if acute diffuse peritonitis (ADP) and diseases associated with a high probability of colorectal perforation were noted. The primary outcome measures included the 30-day postsurgery mortality and surgical mortality of colorectal perforation. We analyzed differences in the observed-to-expected mortality (O/E) ratio between the two groups of hospitals, that is, specialized and non-specialized, using the logistic regression analysis forward selection method.There were 10,090 cases of disease-induced colorectal perforation during the study period. The annual average postoperative fatality rate was 11.36%. There were 3884 patients in the specialized hospital group and 6206 in the non-specialized hospital group. The O/E ratio (0.9106) was significantly lower in the specialized hospital group than in the non-specialized hospital group (1.0704). The experience level of hospitals in treating cases of colorectal perforation negatively correlated with the O/E ratio.We conducted the first study investigating differences among hospitals with respect to their fatality rate of colorectal perforation on the basis of data from a nationwide database. Our data suggest that patients with colorectal perforation should choose to be treated at a specialized hospital or a hospital that treats five or more cases of colorectal perforation per year. The results of this study indicate that specialized hospitals may provide higher quality medical care, which in turn proves that government policy on healthcare is effective at improving the medical system in Japan.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Perforación Intestinal/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Apendicectomía , Enfermedades del Colon/epidemiología , Colostomía , Hospitales/normas , Hospitales Especializados/normas , Hospitales Especializados/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Perforación Intestinal/epidemiología , Japón/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Enfermedades del Recto/epidemiología
13.
Br J Surg ; 104(1): 128-137, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27762435

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The international multicentre registry ECSPECT (European Consensus of Single Port Expertise in Colorectal Treatment) was established to evaluate the general feasibility and safety of single-port colorectal surgery with regard to preoperative risk assessment. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing single-port colorectal surgery were enrolled from 11 European centres between March 2010 and March 2014. Data were analysed to assess patient-, technique- and procedure-dependent parameters. A validated sex-adjusted risk chart was developed for prediction of single-port colorectal surgery-related conversion and complications. RESULTS: Some 1769 patients were enrolled, 937 with benign and 832 with malignant conditions. Procedures were completed without additional trocars in 1628 patients (92·0 per cent). Conversion to open surgery was required in 75 patients (4·2 per cent) and was related to male sex and ASA fitness grade exceeding I. Conversions were more frequent in pelvic procedures involving the rectum compared with abdominal procedures (8·1 versus 3·2 per cent; odds ratio 2·69, P < 0·001). Postoperative complications were observed in a total of 224 patients (12·7 per cent). Independent predictors of complications included male sex (P < 0·001), higher ASA grade (P = 0·006) and rectal procedures (P = 0·002). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 0·5 per cent (8 of 1769 patients); three deaths (0·2 per cent; 1 blood loss, 2 leaks) were attributable to surgical causes. CONCLUSION: The feasibility and safety, conversion and complication profile demonstrated here provides guidance for patient selection.


Asunto(s)
Colon/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Recto/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades del Colon/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/estadística & datos numéricos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Sistema de Registros , Factores Sexuales , Adulto Joven
14.
Surg Today ; 47(6): 683-689, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27650655

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Colorectal perforations are a serious condition associated with a high mortality. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and identify predictors for the surgical mortality in adult patients with colorectal perforation, thereby achieving better outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study of adult patients diagnosed with colorectal perforation operated was performed. The clinical variables that might influence the surgical mortality were first analyzed, and the significant variables were then analyzed using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 423 patients were identified, and the surgical mortality rate was 36.9 %. The most common etiology was diverticulitis (38.2 %). The highest etiology-specific mortality was for colorectal cancer (61.5 %) and ischemic proctocolitis (59.8 %). In a logistic analysis, the significant predictors for the surgical mortality were ≥3 comorbidities (p = 0.034), preoperation American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥4 (p = 0.025), preoperative sepsis or septic shock (p < 0.001), colorectal cancer or ischemic proctocolitis (p = 0.035), reoperation (p = 0.041), and Hinchey classification grade IV (p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that ≥3 comorbidities, a preoperation American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥4, preoperative sepsis or septic shock, colorectal cancer or ischemic proctocolitis, reoperation, and Hinchey classification grade IV are predictors for the surgical mortality in the adult cases of colorectal perforation. These predictors should be taken into consideration to prevent surgical mortality and to reduce potentially unnecessary medical expenses.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/mortalidad , Perforación Intestinal/mortalidad , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Diverticulitis/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proctocolitis/complicaciones , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos
15.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 192(12): 922-930, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27734106

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to identify prognostic factors for survival after magnetic resonance image (MRI)-guided brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: External beam radiotherapy of 45-50.4 Gy was delivered by either three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy or helical tomotherapy. Patients also received high-dose-rate MRI-guided brachytherapy of 5 Gy in 6 fractions. RESULTS: We analyzed 128 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB-IVB cervical cancer who underwent MRI-guided brachytherapy. Most patients (96 %) received concurrent chemotherapy. Pelvic lymph node metastases and para-aortic lymphadenopathies were found in 62 % and 14 % of patients, respectively. The median follow-up time was 44 months. Complete remission was achieved in 119 of 128 patients (93 %). The 5­year local recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival rates were 94, 89, and 85 %, respectively. Negative pelvic lymphadenopathy, gross tumor volume (GTV) dose covering 90 % of the target (GTV D90) of >110 Gy, and treatment duration ≤56 days were associated with better overall survival in univariate analyses. Multivariable analysis showed that GTV D90 of >110 Gy and treatment duration ≤56 days were possibly associated with overall survival with near-significant P-values of 0.062 and 0.073, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of MRI-guided brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer was excellent. GTV D90 of >110 Gy and treatment duration ≤56 days were potentially associated with overall survival.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/mortalidad , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos por Radiación/mortalidad , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagen/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Braquiterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Combinada/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagen/estadística & datos numéricos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/mortalidad , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Recto/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología
16.
Rev. gastroenterol. Perú ; 36(4): 293-303, oct.-dic. 2016. ilus, tab
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-991200

RESUMEN

Introducción: El sangrado digestivo bajo (SDB) es una entidad cuyas tasas de complicaciones y mortalidad se han incrementado en las últimas décadas. Si bien se han identificado algunos factores relacionados a mal pronóstico, aún quedan variables por evaluar. Objetivo: Identificar factores de mal pronóstico en pacientes que presentaron SDB en el Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins de Lima, Perú. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional analítico de tipo cohorte retrospectivo. Se realizó un censo de todos los pacientes que presentaron SDB agudo entre enero 2010 y diciembre 2013. Las variables principales a evaluar fueron frecuencia cardiaca ≥100/min, presión arterial sistólica <100 mmHg y hematocrito bajo (≤35%) al ingreso. Se definió mal pronóstico como cualquiera de los siguientes criterios: muerte durante la hospitalización, sangrado que requiera transfusión de ≥4 unidades de sangre, reingreso dentro del primer mes, o necesidad de cirugía de hemostasia. Resultados: Se incluyó un total de 341 pacientes con SDB, de los cuales el 27% tuvo mal pronóstico y 2% fallecieron. Se encontró como variables asociadas a mal pronóstico: frecuencia cardiaca ≥100/min al ingreso (RR: 1,75, IC 95% 1,23-2,50), presión arterial sistólica <100 mmHg al ingreso (RR: 2,18, IC 95% 1,49-3,19), hematocrito ≤35% al ingreso (RR: 1,98, IC 95% 1,23-3,18) y sangrado de origen no determinado (RR: 2,74, IC 95% 1,73-4,36). Conclusiones: Frecuencia cardiaca elevada al ingreso, hipotensión sistólica al ingreso, hematocrito bajo al ingreso y presentar un sangrado en el cual no se encuentra el punto de origen son factores que incrementan el riesgo de presentar mal pronóstico, por lo que se recomienda un monitoreo más estricto en estos pacientes


Background: Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is an event that has shown an increase in complications and mortality rates in the last decades. Although some factors associated with poor outcome have been identified, there are several yet to be evaluated. Objective: To identify risk factors for poor outcome in patients with LGIB in the Hospital Edgardo Rebagliati Martins of Lima, Peru. Material and methods: A prospective analytic observational cohort study was made, and a census was conducted with all patients with acute LGIB between January 2010 and December 2013. The main variables were heart rate ≥100/min, systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg and low hematocrit (≤35%) at admission. Poor outcome was defined as any of the following: death during hospital stay, bleeding requiring transfusion of ≥4 blood packs, readmission within one month of hospital discharge, or the need for hemostatic surgery. Results: A total of 341 patients with LGIB were included, of which 27% developed poor outcome and 2% died. Variables found to be statistically related to poor outcome were: heart rate ≥ 100/min at admission (RR: 1.75, IC 95% 1.23-2.50), systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg at admission (RR: 2.18, IC 95% 1.49-3.19), hematocrit ≤35% at admission (RR: 1.98, IC 95% 1.23-3.18) and LGIB of unknown origin (RR: 2.74, IC 95% 1.73-4.36). Conclusions: Elevated heart rate at admission, systolic hypotension at admission, low hematocrit at admission and having a LGIB of unknown origin are factors that increase the risk of developing poor outcome, and these patients should be monitored closely due to their higher risk of complications


Asunto(s)
Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Recto/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Colon/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Perú , Pronóstico , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Recto/terapia , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Enfermedades del Colon/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Colon/terapia , Medición de Riesgo , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/mortalidad , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Hemostasis Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Públicos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos
17.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 59(7): 662-9, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27270519

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: More than 450,000 US patients with end-stage renal disease currently dialyze. The risk of morbidity and mortality for these patients after colorectal surgery has been incompletely described. OBJECTIVE: We analyzed the 30-day morbidity and mortality rates of chronic dialysis patients who underwent colorectal surgery. DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis. SETTINGS: Hospitals that participate in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were included. PATIENTS: The study included adult patients who underwent emergency or elective colon or rectal resection between 2009 and 2014. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline characteristics were compared by dialysis status. The impact of chronic dialysis on 30-day mortality and serious postoperative morbidity was examined using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified 128,757 patients who underwent colorectal surgery in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Chronic dialysis patients accounted for 1% (n = 1285) and were more likely to be older (65.4 vs 63.2 years; p < 0.0001), black (27.2% vs 8.7%; p < 0.0001), preoperatively septic (22.1% vs 7.1%; p < 0.0001), require emergency surgery (52.0% vs 14.7%; p < 0.0001), have ischemic bowel (15.7% vs 1.6%; p < 0.0001), or have perforation/peritonitis (15.5% vs 4.2%; p < 0.0001). Chronic dialysis patients were also less likely to have a laparoscopic procedure (17.3% vs 45.0%; p < 0.0001). Chronic dialysis patients had higher unadjusted mortality (22.4% vs 3.3%; p < 0.0001), serious postoperative morbidity (47.9% vs 18.8%; p < 0.0001), and median length of stay (9 vs 6 days; p < 0.0001). In emergent cases (n = 19,375), multivariate logistic regression models demonstrated a higher risk of mortality for dialysis patients (OR = 1.73 (95% CI, 1.38-2.16)) but not for serious morbidity. Models for elective surgery demonstrated a similar effect on mortality (OR = 2.47 (95% CI, 1.75-3.50)) but also demonstrated a higher risk of serious morbidity (OR = 1.28 (95% CI, 1.04-1.56)). LIMITATIONS: The postoperative 30-day window may underestimate the true incidence of serious morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic dialysis patients undergoing elective or emergent colorectal procedures have a higher risk-adjusted mortality.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Recto/cirugía , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Colectomía/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Colon/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Colon/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Enfermedades del Recto/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ajuste de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
18.
Turk J Gastroenterol ; 27(3): 239-45, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27210779

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the association of presenting symptoms with staging, grading, and postoperative 3-year mortality in patients with colon cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 132 patients-with a mean (standard deviation; SD) age of 63.0 (10.0) years and of whom 56.0% were males-with non-metastatic stage I-III colon cancer were included. Symptoms prior to diagnosis were evaluated with respect to tumor localization, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, histological grade, and postoperative 3-year mortality. RESULTS: Constipation and abdominal pain were the two most common symptoms appearing first (29.5% and 16.7%, respectively) and remained most predominant (25.0% and 20.0%, respectively) up to diagnosis. The frequency of admission symptoms significantly differed with respect to tumor location, TNM stage and histological grade. The postoperative 3-year survival rate was 61.4%. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that melena and rectal bleeding increased the likelihood of 3-year mortality by 13.6-fold (p=0.001) and 4.08-fold (p=0.011), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings revealed differences in presenting symptom profiles with respect to the time of manifestation and predominance as well as to the TNM stage, histological grade, and tumor location. Given that melena and rectal bleeding increased the 3-year mortality risk by 13.6-fold and 4.08-fold, respectively, our findings indicate the association of admission symptoms with outcome among patients with colon cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Dolor Abdominal/mortalidad , Dolor Abdominal/patología , Anciano , Neoplasias del Colon/complicaciones , Estreñimiento/etiología , Estreñimiento/mortalidad , Estreñimiento/patología , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/mortalidad , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/patología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Melena/etiología , Melena/mortalidad , Melena/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Periodo Posoperatorio , Enfermedades del Recto/etiología , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Recto/patología , Tasa de Supervivencia
19.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 20(6): 1239-46, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26940943

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: HIV has become a chronic disease, which may render this population more prone to developing the colorectal pathologies that typically affect older Americans. METHODS: A retrospective review of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample was performed to identify patients who underwent colon and rectal surgery from 2001 to 2010. Multivariate analysis was used to evaluate outcomes among the general population, patients with HIV, and patients with AIDS. RESULTS: Hospital admissions for colon and rectal procedures of patients with HIV/AIDS grew at a faster rate than all-cause admissions of patients with HIV/AIDS, with mean yearly increases of 17.8 and 2.1 %, respectively (p < 0.05). Patients with HIV/AIDS undergoing colon and rectal operations for cancer, polyps, diverticular disease, and Clostridium difficile were younger than the general population (51 vs. 65 years; p < 0.01). AIDS was independently associated with increased odds of mortality (OR 2.11; 95 % CI 1.24, 3.61), wound complications (OR 1.53; 95 % CI 1.09, 2.17), and pneumonia (OR 2.02; 95 % CI 1.33, 3.08). Risk-adjusted outcomes of colorectal surgery in patients with HIV did not differ significantly from the general population. CONCLUSION: Postoperative outcomes in patients with HIV are similar to the general population, while patients with AIDS have a higher risk of mortality and certain complications.


Asunto(s)
Colon/cirugía , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/tendencias , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Recto/cirugía , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades del Colon/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Colon/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Enfermedades del Recto/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
20.
APMIS ; 124(6): 475-86, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27004972

RESUMEN

Mucosal melanomas constitute 1.3% of all melanomas and they may develop in any mucosal membrane. Conjunctival melanomas (0.5/million/year) and melanomas in the sinonasal cavity (0.5/million/year) are the most common, followed by anorectal melanomas (0.4/million/year) and melanomas in the oral cavity (0.2/million/year). Anorectal melanoma occurs slightly more often in females, whereas oral melanoma has a male predilection. Mucosal melanoma most commonly develops in a patient's sixth or seventh decade of life, and no differences between races have been found except for sinonasal melanoma and conjunctival melanoma, which are very rare in Black people. The symptoms are not tumour-specific and are related to the organ system affected, and the disease is most often diagnosed at an advanced clinical stage. The diagnosis of a primary tumour is difficult, and metastatic cutaneous melanoma and choroidal melanoma must be excluded. Mutations in KIT are frequently found, while BRAF and NRAS mutations are rarely found - except in conjunctival melanomas that carry BRAF mutations. Mutations in the TERT promotor region are also found in mucosal melanomas. Complete surgical resection with free margins is the treatment of choice. The prognosis is poor, with the 5-year survival rate ranging from 0% (gastric melanoma) to 80% (conjunctival melanoma).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Conjuntiva/patología , Melanoma/patología , Neoplasias de la Boca/patología , Membrana Mucosa/patología , Neoplasias Nasales/patología , Enfermedades del Recto/patología , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Conjuntiva/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Conjuntiva/genética , Neoplasias de la Conjuntiva/mortalidad , Femenino , GTP Fosfohidrolasas/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/epidemiología , Melanoma/genética , Melanoma/mortalidad , Proteínas de la Membrana/genética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Boca/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Boca/genética , Neoplasias de la Boca/mortalidad , Mutación , Neoplasias Nasales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Nasales/genética , Neoplasias Nasales/mortalidad , Regiones Promotoras Genéticas , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-kit/genética , Enfermedades del Recto/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Recto/genética , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Factores Sexuales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Análisis de Supervivencia , Telomerasa/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...