The clinical value of KL-6 for predicting the occurrence and severity of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease is not affected by CTD type or treatment.

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the potential values of Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), systemic immune inflammation (SII), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and red blood cell distribution width (RDW) in the diagnosis and evaluation of the severity of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD). Methods: A total of 140 connective tissue disease (CTD) patients and 85 CTD-ILD patients were recruited for this study at Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital from May 2022 to May 2023. Patients were divided into subgroups based on medication history and CTD subtypes to compare and analyze the clinical data and laboratory parameters of CTD-ILD patients and CTD patients. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of KL-6, NLR, SII, PLR, MLR, and RDW in identifying CTD-ILD patients from CTD patients. A Spearman correlation analysis was conducted to elucidate the correlations between these markers and the lung function parameters of forced vital capacity (FVC, %), forced expired volume in one second (FEV1, %), and diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO, %). Finally, binary logistic regression analysis was applied to discern the independent risk factors for CTD-ILD. Results: NLR, SII, MLR, RDW, and KL-6 displayed significant statistical differences in the experimental groups. In both untreated and treated subgroups, KL-6 displayed higher values for CTD-ILD than CTD among all CTD subtypes. In untreated subgroups, there were significant differences in MLR levels between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and RA-ILD patients and in NLR levels between Sjögren syndrome (SjS) and SjS-ILD patients. There were also significant differences in RDW-SD between the "other CTD" and "other CTD-ILD" groups. In treated subgroups, there were significant differences in both RDW-SD and RDW-CV between RA and RA-ILD patients and in NLR, SII, MLR, PLR, and RDW-SD between "other CTD" and "other CTD-ILD" groups. ROC revealed that KL-6 emerged as the most effective predictor for CTD-ILD in both treated and untreated groups. The multivariate logistic regression analysis results showed that both KL-6 and age were independent risk factors for CTD-ILD. NLR, SII, and PLR were negatively correlated with DLCO (%) in the untreated CTD-ILD group, and KL-6 was negatively correlated with various lung function parameters in both treated and untreated CTD-ILD groups. Conclusion: KL-6 emerged as the most promising biomarker for diagnosing CTD-ILD and assessing its severity. The diagnostic value of KL-6 was unaffected by medication interference and surpassed the value of other parameters, such as NLR, SII, MLR, and RDW. The diagnostic value of RDW-SD was higher than that of RDW-CV in CTD-ILD patients. NLR, SII, MLR, and PLR have potential value in diagnosing the different types of CTD-ILD.

Association of education attainment and risk of connective tissue diseases.

OBJECTIVE: We employed two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to assess the genetic causal relationship between educational attainment (EA) and risk of five common connective tissue diseases (CTDs). METHODS: Educational attainment (self-reported at age ≥30 years) was obtained from a meta-analysis of years of schooling in 766 345 participants of European ancestry from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). A total of 1265 signals associated with EA were identified. Genetic data for five CTDs [rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSc), polymyositis (PM), and dermatomyositis (DM)] were obtained from the FinnGen consortium. Two-sample MR analyses were performed separately for EA and the five CTDs. RESULTS: We found a negative causal relationship between EA and RA (ORIVW = 0.627, 95% CI = 0.537-0.732, p < .001), and SLE (ORIVW = 0.341, 95% CI = 0.123-0.944, p = .038). There were no genetic causal association between EA and SSc (ORIVW = 0.647, 95% CI = 0.351-1.195, p = .164), PM (ORIVW = 0.938, 95% CI = 0.320-2.746, p = .907), or DM (ORIVW = 0.754, 95% CI = 0.351-1.619, p = .468). None of the analyses revealed any horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated a potential causal association between EA and RA, SLE, emphasizing the need for further investigation and potential integration of EA into clinical practice to enhance treatment strategies.

Treatment of calcinosis cutis associated with autoimmune connective tissue diseases.

Calcinosis cutis is a condition that is commonly associated with autoimmune connective tissue diseases. It is characterized by the deposition of insoluble calcium salts in the skin and subcutaneous tissue, which can cause pain, impair function, and have significant impacts on quality of life. Calcinosis cutis is difficult to manage because there is no generally accepted treatment: evidence supporting treatments is mostly comprised of case reports and case series, sometimes yielding mixed findings. Both pharmacologic and procedural interventions have been proposed to improve calcinosis cutis, and each may be suited to different clinical scenarios. This review summarizes current treatment options for calcinosis cutis, with discussion of recommendations based on patient-specific factors and disease severity.

An explainable machine learning-based model to predict intensive care unit admission among patients with community-acquired pneumonia and connective tissue disease.

BACKGROUND: There is no individualized prediction model for intensive care unit (ICU) admission on patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and connective tissue disease (CTD) so far. In this study, we aimed to establish a machine learning-based model for predicting the need for ICU admission among those patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective study on patients admitted into a University Hospital in China between November 2008 and November 2021. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with CAP and CTD during admission and hospitalization. Data related to demographics, CTD types, comorbidities, vital signs and laboratory results during the first 24 h of hospitalization were collected. The baseline variables were screened to identify potential predictors via three methods, including univariate analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression and Boruta algorithm. Nine supervised machine learning algorithms were used to build prediction models. We evaluated the performances of differentiation, calibration, and clinical utility of all models to determine the optimal model. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) techniques were performed to interpret the optimal model. RESULTS: The included patients were randomly divided into the training set (1070 patients) and the testing set (459 patients) at a ratio of 70:30. The intersection results of three feature selection approaches yielded 16 predictors. The eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model achieved the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.941) and accuracy (0.913) among various models. The calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) both suggested that the XGBoost model outperformed other models. The SHAP summary plots illustrated the top 6 features with the greatest importance, including higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and C-reactive protein (CRP), lower level of CD4 + T cell, lymphocyte and serum sodium, and positive serum (1,3)-ß-D-glucan test (G test). CONCLUSION: We successfully developed, evaluated and explained a machine learning-based model for predicting ICU admission in patients with CAP and CTD. The XGBoost model could be clinical referenced after external validation and improvement.

Imaging of Pulmonary Manifestations of Connective Tissue Disease.

The majority of connective tissue diseases (CTDs) are multisystem disorders that are often heterogeneous in their presentation and do not have a single laboratory, histologic, or radiologic feature that is defined as the gold standard to support a specific diagnosis. Given this challenging situation, the diagnosis of CTD is a process that requires the synthesis of multidisciplinary data which may include patient clinical symptoms, serologic evaluation, laboratory testing, and imaging. Pulmonary manifestations of connective tissue disease include interstitial lung disease as well as multicompartmental manifestations. These CT imaging patterns and features of specific diseases will be discussed in this article.

Clinically Relevant Biomarkers in Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) complicates connective tissue disease (CTD) with variable incidence and is a leading cause of death in these patients. To improve CTD-ILD outcomes, early recognition and management of ILD is critical. Blood-based and radiologic biomarkers that assist in the diagnosis CTD-ILD have long been studied. Recent studies, including -omic investigations, have also begun to identify biomarkers that may help prognosticate such patients. This review provides an overview of clinically relevant biomarkers in patients with CTD-ILD, highlighting recent advances to assist in the diagnosis and prognostication of CTD-ILD.

A Novel COL2A1 Gene Pathogenic Variant in a Turkish Family With Ocular Stickler Syndrome.

A 6-month-old female infant with megalophthalmos was referred with the suspicion of congenital glaucoma. Refractive measurements obtained with handheld autorefractometry were -7.00 -2.00 × 90° in the right eye and -6.00 -2.00 × 100° in the left eye and ultrasonic axial lengths were 22.50 mm in both eyes. Intraocular pressures and vertical and horizontal corneal diameters of the proband were 11 mm Hg, 11 mm, and 11.50 mm in both eyes, respectively. She was diagnosed as having early-onset high myopia. Her father also had degenerative high myopia (-12.00 diopters) in the right eye, bilateral congenital lens opacities, and retinal detachment in the left eye. Her mother was emmetropic with normal eye examination results. Clinical exome sequencing analysis revealed a novel ENST00000380518.3 c.3528_3530 delins GACCATTAGCA (Chr12:48369813: GCA > TGCTAATGGTC) variant in the collagen type II alpha 1 chain (COL2A1) on chromosome 12q13 (OMIM 108300), consistent with the Stickler syndrome type 1. Subsequent segregation analysis revealed paternal inheritance. Although many pathogenic null variants have been described within the COL2A1 gene, there is currently no documented literature pertaining to this specific variant, making this the inaugural report of its manifestation in scientific discourse. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024;61(3):e23-e27.].

Clinical trial eligibility of a real-world connective tissue disease cohort: Results from the LEAP cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Classification criteria aim to identify a homogenous population of patients for research. We aimed to quantify how well phase-III trials in connective tissue diseases (CTDs) represent a real-world cohort. METHODS: A comprehensive review of all major published phase-III trials in CTDs was performed (clinicaltrials.gov). Classification criteria utilised most commonly in clinical trials were applied to a multicentre unselected CTD cohort. RESULTS: There were 42 CTD trials identified, with no trials in mixed (MCTD) or undifferentiated CTD (UCTD). The majority of trials (N = 38, 90 %) required patients to meet classification criteria for their respective disease. Eight (19.0 %) excluded patients with overlapping CTDs and a further two (4.8 %) excluded specific overlapping features, such as pulmonary arterial hypertension. One study explicitly allowed overlap syndromes. Our real-world CTD cohort included 391 patients. Patients with UCTD or MCTD (91/391, 23.3 %) would be excluded from participation in clinical trials for not having an eligible diagnosis. Of patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS), SLE, systemic sclerosis (SSc) or idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), 211/300 (70.3 %) met the classification criteria for their respective diagnosis and 24/211 (11.4 %) met criteria for >1 CTD. In total, 187/391 (47.8 %) would be eligible for recruitment, based upon their physician diagnosis, and most stringent trial eligibility criteria. CONCLUSION: In an unselected, real-world CTD cohort, up to half of patients are ineligible for clinical trials due to not meeting classification criteria, overlapping features or a lack of trials within their primary disease. To address this inequality in access to novel therapies, clinical trial design should evolve eligibility criteria in CTDs.

[Interstitial Lung Disease associated with Connective Tissue Diseases]. / Interstitielle Pneumopathien bei Konnektivitiden.

INTRODUCTION: Interstitial Lung Disease associated with Connective Tissue Diseases Abstract: Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are in up to one-third of cases associated with connective tissue diseases (CTD). In systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, polymyositis/dermatomyositis, Sjögren's syndrome, and mixed connective tissue disease, an associated ILD significantly increases morbidity and mortality. The diagnostic workup for suspected CTD-ILD includes a range of functional, radiological, laboratory, and, if necessary, invasive tests. A thorough medical history and physical examination with targeted rheumatological diagnosis is particularly important. Also, patients with unclassified ILDs should be evaluated thoroughly for any underlying CTD. Pharmacological treatment options for CTD-ILD differ significantly from those for other ILDs. In addition to short-term glucocorticoids, antimetabolites and biological agents are often used. Antifibrotic drugs have also been successfully used in CTD-ILDs. The decision on whether and which immunosuppressive and/or antifibrotic therapy is indicated depends on the underlying disease, disease activity, extrapulmonary manifestations, severity of organ involvement, ILD progression, comorbidities, and patient preferences. Complex treatment decisions are ideally made in multidisciplinary expert teams.

Identification of connective tissue disease autoantibodies and a novel autoantibody anti-annexin A11 in patients with "idiopathic" interstitial lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Autoantibodies are a hallmark feature of Connective Tissue Diseases (CTD). Their presence in patients with idiopathic interstitial lung disease (ILD) may suggest covert CTD. We aimed to determine the prevalence of CTD autoantibodies in patients diagnosed with idiopathic ILD. METHODS: 499 patient sera were analysed: 251 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), 206 idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (iNSIP) and 42 cryptogenic organising pneumonia (COP). Autoantibody status was determined by immunoprecipitation. RESULTS: 2.4% of IPF sera had a CTD-autoantibody compared to 10.2% of iNSIP and 7.3% of COP. 45% of autoantibodies were anti-synthetases. A novel autoantibody targeting an unknown 56 kDa protein was found in seven IPF patients (2.8%) and two NSIP (1%) patients. This was characterised as anti-annexin A11. CONCLUSION: Specific guidance on autoantibody testing and interpretation in patients with ILD could improve diagnostic accuracy. Further work is required to determine the clinical significance of anti-annexin A11.

Lung adenocarcinoma discovered during the follow-up of lung-dominant connective tissue disease: a case report and literature review.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) can lead to lung cancer, which brings great challenges to differential diagnosis and comprehensive treatment. However, the clinical features of lung-dominant connective tissue disease (LD-CTD) related ILD combined with lung cancer has not been validated. We report the case of an 80-year-old woman with LD-CTD treated regularly with nintedanib who presented progressive dyspnoea and hypoxemia after recurrent viral infections. Her chest computed tomography (CT) showed aggravated interstitial fibrosis in both lower lungs with moderate right pleural effusion. Clinicians should be alert to lung cancer in patients who are experiencing poor responsiveness to treatment or acute progression of ILD. The available literatures about the differential diagnosis of clinical manifestations, imaging, treatment and prognosis of LD-CTD are reviewed and discussed in this study.

Relationship between idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) and connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD): A narrative review.

While idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) centering on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most prevalent interstitial lung disease (ILD), especially in the older adult population, connective tissue disease (CTD)-related ILD is the second most prevalent ILD. The pathogenesis of IPF is primarily fibrosis, whereas that of other ILDs, particularly CTD-ILD, is mainly inflammation. Therefore, a precise diagnosis is crucial for selecting appropriate treatments, such as antifibrotic or immunosuppressive agents. In addition, some patients with IIP have CTD-related features, such as arthritis and skin eruption, but do not meet the criteria for any CTD, this is referred to as interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF). IPAF is closely associated with idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (iNSIP) and cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP). Furthermore, patients with iNSIP or those with NSIP with OP overlap frequently develop polymyositis/dermatomyositis after the diagnosis of IIP. Acute exacerbation of ILD, the most common cause of death, occurs more frequently in patients with IPF than in those with other ILDs. Although acute exacerbation of CTD-ILD occurs at a low rate of incidence, patients with rheumatoid arthritis, microscopic polyangiitis, or systemic sclerosis experience more acute exacerbation of CTD-ILD than those with other CTD. In this review, the features of each IIP, focusing on CTD-related signatures, are summarized, and the pathogenesis and appropriate treatments to improve the prognoses of patients with various ILDs are discussed.

Diagnostic Approach to Interstitial Lung Diseases Associated with Connective Tissue Diseases.

Interstitial lung disorders are a group of respiratory diseases characterized by interstitial compartment infiltration, varying degrees of infiltration, and fibrosis, with or without small airway involvement. Although some are idiopathic (e.g., idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, and sarcoidosis), the great majority have an underlying etiology, such as systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD, also called Connective Tissue Diseases or CTD), inhalational exposure to organic matter, medications, and rarely, genetic disorders. This review focuses on diagnostic approaches in interstitial lung diseases associated with SARDs. To make an accurate diagnosis, a multidisciplinary, personalized approach is required, with input from various specialties, including pulmonary, rheumatology, radiology, and pathology, to reach a consensus. In a minority of patients, a definitive diagnosis cannot be established. Their clinical presentations and prognosis can be variable even within subsets of SARDs.

Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.

Importance: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) consists of a group of pulmonary disorders characterized by inflammation and/or fibrosis of the lung parenchyma associated with progressive dyspnea that frequently results in end-stage respiratory failure. In the US, ILD affects approximately 650 000 people and causes approximately 25 000 to 30 000 deaths per year. Observations: The most common forms of ILD are idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), which accounts for approximately one-third of all cases of ILD, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, accounting for 15% of ILD cases, and connective tissue disease (CTD), accounting for 25% of ILD cases. ILD typically presents with dyspnea on exertion. Approximately 30% of patients with ILD report cough. Thoracic computed tomography is approximately 91% sensitive and 71% specific for diagnosing subtypes of ILDs such as IPF. Physiologic assessment provides important prognostic information. A 5% decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) over 12 months is associated with an approximately 2-fold increase in mortality compared with no change in FVC. Antifibrotic therapy with nintedanib or pirfenidone slows annual FVC decline by approximately 44% to 57% in individuals with IPF, scleroderma associated ILD, and in those with progressive pulmonary fibrosis of any cause. For connective tissue disease-associated ILD, immunomodulatory therapy, such as tocilizumab, rituximab, and mycophenolate mofetil, may slow decline or even improve FVC at 12-month follow-up. Structured exercise therapy reduces symptoms and improves 6-minute walk test distance in individuals with dyspnea. Oxygen reduces symptoms and improves quality of life in individuals with ILD who desaturate below 88% on a 6-minute walk test. Lung transplant may improve symptoms and resolve respiratory failure in patients with end-stage ILD. After lung transplant, patients with ILD have a median survival of 5.2 to 6.7 years compared with a median survival of less than 2 years in patients with advanced ILD who do not undergo lung transplant. Up to 85% of individuals with end-stage fibrotic ILD develop pulmonary hypertension. In these patients, treatment with inhaled treprostinil improves walking distance and respiratory symptoms. Conclusions and Relevance: Interstitial lung disease typically presents with dyspnea on exertion and can progress to respiratory failure. First-line therapy includes nintedanib or pirfenidone for IPF and mycophenolate mofetil for ILD due to connective tissue disease. Lung transplant should be considered for patients with advanced ILD. In patients with ILD, exercise training improves 6-minute walk test distance and quality of life.

Clinical characteristics of patients with connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease: a retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Interstitial lung disease is one of the most critical manifestations of connective tissue diseases that may cause morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and demographic characteristics and treatment of the patients with connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease. METHOD: This retrospective observational study included patients from the Gulhane Rheumatology Interstitial Lung Disease cohort between October 2016 and June 2023. The patients were assessed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 63.4 ± 11.9 years. The frequencies of CTD were 34.1% Sjogren's syndrome, 30.1% rheumatoid arthritis, 25.4% systemic sclerosis, 5.8% undifferentiated connective tissue disease, 2.9% idiopathic inflammatory myositis, 1.2% mixt connective tissue disease, and 0.6% systemic lupus erythematosus in decreasing frequencies. Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, which was the most common interstitial lung disease pattern in 103 (59.5%) patients, was most frequent among patients with SS and SSc (p < 0.001 vs. p < 0.001). Usual interstitial pneumonia was most frequent among patients with RA (p < 0.001). All patients received immunosuppressive treatment, most commonly azathioprine. 57.2% were using immunosuppressives for ILD. Six patients had mortality, and infections were the leading cause. CONCLUSIONS: As a critical manifestation of connective tissue diseases, immunosuppressive treatment is indispensable in the management of interstitial lung diseases especially those at an increased risk for progression. The treatment approaches should be assessed in a patient-based way. The patients under immunosuppressive treatment should be cautiously followed for infections. Key Points • Interstitial lung disease is a noteworthy manifestation of connective tissue diseases. • The clinical findings, treatment requirements, and progression vary according to the severity of the disease. • Immunosuppressive treatment may be essential in patients with worsening symptoms, impaired pulmonary function tests, and radiological findings.

Connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease.

Connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) represents a group of systemic autoimmune disorders characterized by immune-mediated organ dysfunction. Systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, idiopathic inflammatory myositis, and Sjögren's syndrome are the most common CTDs that present with pulmonary involvement, as well as with interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features. The frequency of CTD-ILD varies according to the type of CTD, but the overall incidence is 15%, causing an important impact on morbidity and mortality. The decision of which CTD patient should be investigated for ILD is unclear for many CTDs. Besides that, the clinical spectrum can range from asymptomatic findings on imaging to respiratory failure and death. A significant proportion of patients will present with a more severe and progressive disease, and, for those, immunosuppression with corticosteroids and cytotoxic medications are the mainstay of pharmacological treatment. In this review, we summarized the approach to diagnosis and treatment of CTD-ILD, highlighting recent advances in therapeutics for the various forms of CTD.

Anti-SSA Ro52 and anti-Ro60 autoantibodies: association with clinical phenotypes.

OBJECTIVES: Anti-SSA autoantibodies can be differentiated according to their antigenic target proteins as anti-Ro60 (60 kDa) or anti-Ro52 (52 kDa). Anti-SSA(Ro60) antibodies are clearly associated with connective tissue diseases (CTD), but the clinical significance of anti-SSA(Ro52) antibodies remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to analyse the disease phenotype of patients with anti-Ro52 and/or anti-Ro60 antibodies. METHODS: A multicentre, cross-sectional study was carried out of positive anti-Ro52 and/or Ro60 antibodies patients followed at 10 Rheumatology centres from January 2018 until December 2021. Patients were categorised into 3 groups: group 1 (Ro52+/Ro60-); group 2 (Ro52-/Ro60+); group 3 (Ro52+/Ro60+). Antinuclear antibodies were evaluated by indirect immunofluorescence assay and further screened for anti-extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) antibodies. Demographicsand clinical data were compared between the 3 groups, by patients' medical chart review. Univariate analysis was performed and subsequently logistic regression was used to identify intergroup differences and calculate the odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: We included 776 patients [female: 83.1%; median age: 59 (46-71) years]. Groups 1, 2, and 3 comprised 31.1%, 32.6%, and 36.3% of the patients, respectively. Anti-Ro52 antibody alone was more frequently associated with non-rheumatic diseases, older age, and men (p<0.05). Among patients with CTD, the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus is 3 and 2 times more prevalent in groups 2 and 3, respectively, than in group 1 [OR 2.8 (95% CI 1.60, 4.97), p<0.001; OR 2.2 (95% CI 1.28, 3.86), p<0.01]. In group 2, the diagnosis of undifferentiated CTD is more frequent than in the other groups. Group 1 was more frequently associated with inflammatory myositis than group 2 [OR 0.09 (95% CI 0.01, 0.33), p<0.001] or group 3 [OR 0.08 (95% CI 0.01, 0.29), p<0.001]. Group 1 was also more frequently associated with arthritis (p<0.01), interstitial lung disease (p<0.01), and myositis (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-Ro52+ antibody alone is frequently found in patients with non-rheumatic diseases. In addition, anti-Ro52+ antibody is also prevalent in patients with CTD and associated with clinical phenotypes that are different from anti-Ro60+ antibody.

Interdisciplinary Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease and Connective Tissue Disease.

A diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases (ILD) can be challenging, and the identification of an associated connective tissue disease (CTD) is crucial to estimate prognosis and to establish the optimal treatment approach. Diagnostic delay, limited expertise, and fragmented care are barriers that impede the delivery of comprehensive health care for patients with rare, complex, and multiorgan diseases such as CTD and ILD. In this article, we present our perspective on the interdisciplinary diagnosis and interprofessional treatment of patients with ILD and suspected CTD or CTD at risk of ILD. We outline the structure of our service, delineating the roles and responsibilities of the team members. Additionally, we provide an overview of our patient population, including diagnostic approaches and specific treatments, and illustrate a patient case. Furthermore, we focus on specific benefits and challenges of joint interdisciplinary and interprofessional patient consultations. The importance of rheumatology and pulmonology assessments in specific patient populations is emphasized. Finally, we explore future directions and discuss potential strategies to improve care delivery for patients with CTD-associated ILD.