Endoscopic Characteristics of Small-Bowel Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Detected During Single-Balloon Enteroscopy: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS:  The endoscopic features of small-bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are not well defined. The objective of this study was to describe the endoscopic features of GISTs of the small intestine detected via single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE). MATERIALS AND METHODS:  Patients with surgically confirmed small intestinal GISTs from January 2014 to September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The hospital's electronic medical record system was used to retrieve the patients' data, including their demographics, clinical symptoms, hemoglobin on admission, endoscopic and computerized tomography findings, clinicopathological findings, and surgical management data. RESULTS:  In total, 46 GIST patients (23 men and 23 women) with overt bleeding were included, with a mean age of 52 years (23-80 years). The typical duration of the symptoms was 48 hours. Four patients (8.70%) had lesions in the duodenum, 32 (69.56%) had lesions in the jejunum, 8 (17.39%) had lesions in the ileum, and 2 (4.35%) had lesions around the junction of the jejunum and ileum. Out of the 46 patients, 27 underwent SBE, and GISTs were visualized in 25, while the lesions could not be visualized in the remaining 2. Submucosal round (n = 13), submucosal sessile (n = 8), and invasive/penetrating (n = 4) were among the endoscopic tumor features. Twenty patients exhibited submucosal protuberant lesions, with ulceration, vascular nodules/congestion, or erosion on the surface, and 5 patients presented ulcerative infiltrative lesions. The multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that the invasive/penetrating characteristics of GISTs under SBE evaluation are significantly correlated with the risk level of GIST malignancy (P < .05). CONCLUSION:  A variety of endoscopic characteristics could be observed during the preoperative SBE evaluation of small-intestine GISTs.

Single-operator single-balloon enteroscopy is safe and effective: A 6-year retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) is an effective tool for the detection of small intestine lesions. Because it is conventionally performed by two operators, the efficacy of single-operator SBE method has not yet been elucidated. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield, total enteroscopy rate, procedure time, and complications of single-operator SBE for small intestinal disease. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study including consecutive patients who underwent single-operator SBE for suspicious small intestinal disorders or required therapeutic interventions between December 2014 and January 2019. The SBE procedures were performed by four endoscopists. Diagnostic yield, total enteroscopy rate, procedure time, incubation depth, and complications were analyzed, and stratification analysis was performed. RESULTS: Altogether 922 patients with 1422 SBE procedures were included for analysis, among whom 250, 172, and 500 patients underwent SBE via the oral route, the anal route and a combined route, respectively. The overall diagnostic yield was 78.52% (724/922). And 253 patients achieved total enteroscopy, with a total enteroscopy rate of 56.10%. The average procedure time for the oral and anal routes were 69.28 ± 14.72 min and 64.95 ± 13.87 min, respectively. While the incubation depth was 389.95 ± 131.42 cm and 191.81 ± 83.67 cm, respectively. Jejunal perforation was observed in one patient, which was managed by endoclips. Stratification analysis showed that the diagnostic yield and total enteroscopy rate significantly increased with operation experience together with decreased procedure time. CONCLUSION: Single-operator SBE is effective and safe for the detection of small intestinal lesions, and is easy to master.

Double balloon enteroscopy versus single balloon enteroscopy: A comparative study.

Device assisted enteroscopy (DAE) like the double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and single balloon enteroscopy (SBE) are postulated to ease small bowel examination and performance of therapy. However, studies comparing the effectiveness of these 2 modalities have yielded varying results. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of SBE and DBE. We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent DBE (n = 82) or SBE (n = 45) for small bowel exam in our unit from January 2014 to January 2022. Our primary outcomes were to compare the technical success and diagnostic success rates between DBE and SBE. Our secondary outcomes were to compare the therapeutic success, and complication rates. The main indications were suspected GI bleeding (DBE 41.5% vs SBE 48.9%), iron deficiency anemia (DBE 9.8% vs SBE 4.4%) and small bowel lesions (DBE 28.0% vs SBE 44.4%) detected either from prior capsule endoscopy or radiological imaging. Majority of the enteroscopy exam was by antegrade approach (DBE 67.1% vs SBE 77.8%). We found no significant difference in the technical success (DBE 95.1% vs SBE 97.8%, P = .46), diagnostic success (DBE 69.5% vs SBE 77.8%, P = .36) and the therapeutic success rate (DBE 63.2% vs SBE 54.3%, P = .09) between the groups. Complications occurred in 1 case from each group (mucosal tear). None of the complications were major. In patients who underwent enteroscopy, the diagnostic and therapeutic performance of SBE is similar to DBE. Both procedures were safe with low complication rates.

[Exploration of the small intestine through single-balloon enteroscopy, experience in the Mohammed V Training Military Hospital in Rabat: about 51 cases]. / Exploration du grêle par entéroscopie simple ballon, expérience de l´Hôpital militaire et d´instruction Mohamed V de Rabat: à propos de 51 cas.

Enteroscopy has become an indispensable technique for the exploration and, in particular, the treatment of small intestine lesions. It is usually performed following video capsule endoscopy of the small intestine. Three equivalent techniques exist: double balloon enteroscopy, single balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy. The purpose of this study is to describe the technical feasibility of single balloon enteroscopy as well as its tolerance, indications and the results obtained in our context. We conducted a retrospective and descriptive analysis of the records of patients undergoing single balloon enteroscopy in the Department of Gastroenterology at the Mohammed V Training Military Hospital in Rabat over an 8-year period. Inclusion criteria were: small intestine disease or the suspicion of small intestine disease on imaging tests or video-capsule endoscopy and having undergone single balloon enteroscopy. The variables studied were the technical feasibility of single balloon enteroscopy, its indications, results and complications. Fifty-one (51) patients, including 30 men and 21 women with an average age of 48 years (18 years-91 years), were included in the study. The technique used in all patients was single balloon enteroscopy under general anesthesia with intubation. The mean duration of single balloon enteroscopy via the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract (antegrade) was 45 min and 60 min via the lower GI tract (retrograde). The small intestine was explored up to the proximal ileum via the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract and through more than 120cm from IAD via the lower GI tract. The indications included: unexplained digestive bleeding (72%), small intestine wall thickening (17%), the suspicion of small intestine tumor (6%), evaluation of Crohn´s disease (4%) and endoscopic video capsule (ECV) reduction (2%). Diagnosis was made or confirmed in 29 patients, reflecting a diagnostic efficiency of 57%. Angiodysplasia accounted for 70% of the lesions, ulcerations 10%, stenoses 7%, tumors 7%, diverticula 3% and spontaneous ECV reduction 3%. Endoscopic treatment was performed in 20 patients, with a therapeutic efficiency of 39%; it was based on argon plasma coagulation of gastroenteric angiodysplasia lesions. No complications were observed in our case series. Single balloon enteroscopy is a well-tolerated examination which allows for the exploration of a long portion of the small intestine. Multiple and various indications were provided in our study and the diagnostic and therapeutic benefits were satisfactory.

Single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy and choledocholithiasis: do technical improvements mean better outcomes?

BACKGROUND: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy is challenging. Single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (SBE-ERCP) is an innovative alternative to reach the bile duct. OBJECTIVE: to report our experience in SBE-ERCP in patients who presented with Roux-en-Y anatomy and choledocholithiasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: patients who presented choledocholithiasis and underwent SBE-ERCP between January 2018 and April 2020 were retrospectively identified via medical records and the digestive endoscopy database. Enteroscopy success was defined as reaching the biliary limb and papilla identification. ERCP diagnostic success was defined as a successful duct cannulation and cholangiography, and ERCP procedural success was defined as the ability to successfully carry out choledocholithiasis extraction. Complications of ERCP were defined according to standard criteria. RESULTS: a total of eleven patients (two females) with a mean age of 81 years (range 60-91 years) with Roux-en-Y anastomosis underwent ERCP using a SBE on 13 occasions. The indication for all procedures was choledocholithiasis, which had been previously confirmed by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Enteroscopy success occurred in 13/13 (100 %) of procedures. Overall ERCP diagnostic success was achieved in 11/13 (84.6 %) of procedures. The ERCP procedural success was obtained in 11/11 (100 %) of patients (84.6 % of procedures). A mild pancreatitis occurred in a patient with native papilla. CONCLUSIONS: SBE-ERCP is feasible, efficacious and safe in patients with postsurgical Roux-en-Y anatomy and choledocholithiasis. Technical improvements may mean better outcomes

No disponible

Single-balloon enteroscopy in management of small-bowel disorders.

BACKGROUND: Device-assisted enteroscopy including single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) allows direct visualization of the small bowel and has good safety and efficacy in experienced hands. Our study is aimed to share our single-centre experience of SBE in diagnosing and treating small-bowel disorders. METHODS: We reviewed the prospectively collected data (from December 2016 to December 2019) of 180 consecutive anterograde and/or retrograde procedures. Analysis of baseline characteristics, endoscopic findings, and diagnostic and therapeutic rates was done. RESULTS: SBE was done in 158 patients with a median age of 55 years (range, 13-94 years) for suspected small-bowel lesions. Dual enteroscopy (anterograde plus retrograde) was done in 22 patients (13.92%). The indication for the procedure was obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in 129 (71.66%), chronic unexplained abdominal pain in 20 (11.11%), suspected small-bowel abnormality in the form of narrowing and/or mass on imaging in 10 (5.5%), chronic diarrhea in 9 (5%), unexplained iron deficiency anemia in 9 (5%), and retained capsule in 2 (1.11%). The most common finding was ulcer, which was noted in 45 (25%) patients followed by stricture in 8 (4.44%) and both ulcers and strictures in 6 (3.33%) patients. SBE was normal in 61 (33.88%) patients. SBE gave a diagnosis in 66.11% while in 28.43% cases, therapeutic intervention was done. Minor complications like bleeding were noted in 3 patients and mild acute pancreatitis in 2 patients. Jejunal perforation requiring surgical intervention was noted in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: SBE is a safe and effective procedure in diagnosing and treating small-bowel diseases.

A combination of single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted laparoscopy and endoscopic mucosal resection for treating gastrointestinal venous malformations in blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome (BRBNS) is a rare congenital disease characterized by multifocal venous malformations. It remains a considerable challenge in treating the gastrointestinal (GI) venous malformations due to multiple lesions throughout the GI tract, and the likelihood of recurrence. We report a case study of BRBNS in the GI tract, in which GI venous malformations and related GI bleeding were successfully treated with a combination of multiple endoscopic procedures. CASE PRESENTATION: A 17-year-old man was admitted to our hospital for dizziness and hypodynamia. The symptoms persisted for nearly 1 year. The laboratory tests revealed iron-deficiency anemia with abnormally low hemoglobin (Hb), and a strong positive fecal occult blood test. A total of four hemangiomas were detected: one in the stomach, one in the descending colon, and two in the small intestines with a high risk of hemorrhage. Under gastroendoscopy, enteroscopy, and video capsule endoscopy (VCE) throughout the GI tract, the patient underwent surgical treatment. Endoscopic mucosal resection was initially performed in the stomach and colon, and the lesions in the small intestine were resected with laparoscopy auxiliaried by single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE), during which SBE assisted in identifying the lesions. The patient well-tolerated the procedures, and had a favorable prognosis. CONCLUSION: The combination of single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted laparoscopy and endoscopic mucosal resection was effective for the present case, which could be considered for patients with similar clinical conditions.

Hemorragia digestiva alta secundaria a sobreingesta de inhibidores selectivos de la recaptación de serotonina y antiinflamatorios no esteroideos / Upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to overdose of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

No disponible

Serum C-Reactive Protein and Max Polyp Diameter Are Useful Markers of Complications of Small-Intestinal Polypectomy.

BACKGROUND This study aimed to identify the risk factors of complications after small-intestinal polypectomy by single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE), and to assess the value of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and the max polyp diameter (Dmax) in predicting postoperative complications of small-intestinal polypectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between April 2017 and April 2018, clinical data from 37 patients who underwent small-intestinal polypectomy were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS Thirty-seven small-intestinal polypectomy procedures (18 oral and 19 anal) were carried out in 37 patients (M: F 20: 17; age 35.6±13.0 years). A total of 1081 small-intestine polyps were removed. Three patients (8.1%) had bleeding and 3 patients (8.1%) had perforation after small-intestinal polypectomy. Based on multivariate logistic analysis, CRP [1.104 (95% CI 1.022-1.191)] was the only risk factor for complications among the patients. According to the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, CRP (27.5 mg/L), Dmax (3.5 cm), and the combination of CRP + Dmax appear to be predictive factors for complications after small-intestinal polypectomy. CONCLUSIONS SBE is an effective endoscopic tool for patients with small-intestinal polyps. CRP, Dmax, and the combination of CRP+Dmax may be potential predictors of complications from small-intestinal polypectomy.

Application of single balloon enteroscopy-assisted therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients after bilioenteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis: Experience of multi-disciplinary collaboration.

BACKGROUND: Bilioenteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis is one of the most complicated approaches for reconstructing the gastrointestinal tract, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is technically challenging in patients after bilioenteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis. The optimal endoscopic strategies for such cases remain unknown. AIM: To explore the feasibility and effectiveness of single balloon enteroscopy-assisted (SBE-assisted) therapeutic ERCP in patients after bilioenteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis based on multi-disciplinary collaboration between endoscopists and surgeons as well as report the experience from China. METHODS: This is a single center retrospective study. All of the SBE-assisted therapeutic ERCP procedures were performed by the collaboration between endoscopists and surgeons. The operation time, success rate, and complication rate were calculated. RESULTS: Forty-six patients received a total of 64 SBE-assisted therapeutic ERCP procedures, with successful scope intubation in 60 (93.8%) cases and successful diagnosis in 59 (92.2%). All successfully diagnosed cases received successful therapy. None of the cases had perforation or bleeding during or after operation, and no post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred. CONCLUSION: Based on multi-disciplinary collaboration, SBE-assisted therapeutic ERCP in patients after bilioenteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis is relatively safe and effective and has a high success rate.

The efficacy of limited endoscopic sphincterotomy plus endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for removal of large bile duct stones.

BACKGROUND: The removal of large bile duct stones (> 15 mm) by conventional endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) can be challenging, requiring mechanical lithotripsy (ML) in addition to EST or EPBD. The primary complication of ML is basket and stone impaction, which can lead to complications such as pancreatitis and cholangitis. The present study aims to investigate the efficacy of limited EST plus endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EST-EPLBD) for large bile duct stone extraction with an extent of cutting < 1/2 the length of the papillary mound. METHODS: We enrolled 185 patients with ≥15 mm bile duct stones who received EST, EPLBD and limited EST-EPLBD treatment from January 1, 2010 to February 28, 2018, at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Kaohsiung, Taiwan). All patients were categorized into three groups: EST group (n = 31), EPLBD group (n = 96), and limited EST-EPLBD group (n = 58). The primary outcome variables were the success rate of complete stone removal and complications. RESULTS: The limited EST-EPLBD group exhibited a higher success rate of the first-session treatment compared with the EST and EPLBD groups (98.3% vs. 83.9% vs. 86.5%; P = 0.032) but required a longer procedure time (32 (12-61) min vs. 23.5 (17-68) min vs. 25.0 (14-60) min; P = 0.001). The need for ML during the procedure was 4 (12.9%) in the EST group, 10 (10.4%) in the EPLBD group and 2 (3.4%) in the limited EST-EPLBD group. Post-procedure bleeding in the EST group was more common than that in the limited EST-EPLBD group (9.7% vs. 0%; P = 0.038). Furthermore, dilated bile duct was the only risk factor for bile duct stone recurrence in the limited EST-EPLBD group. CONCLUSIONS: Limited EST-EPLBD exhibits a higher success rate but requires marginally longer procedure time for the first-session treatment. Furthermore, dilated bile duct is the only risk factor for bile duct stone recurrence in patients undergoing limited EST-EPLBD.

Device assisted enteroscopy in the elderly - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Device assisted enteroscopy (DAE) is increasingly being carried out in elderly patients. This provides a challenge due to the underlying varied physiology and comorbidities these patients have. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search for studies on elderly patients undergoing DAE. We calculated the pooled diagnostic (DY) and therapeutic yields (TY), major adverse events, length of small bowel examined and sedation administered. These were also compared to younger patients. RESULTS: Fourteen high quality articles on DAE in the elderly were included in this analysis (3289 total, 1712 elderly) patients. Nine of these studies were included in the final meta-analysis (681 elderly, 1577 young patients). The overall DY of DAE, double balloon enterosocpy (DBE) and single balloon enteroscopy (SBE) were 0.68 (p = 0.000001), 1.74 (p = 0.0001) and 1.90 (p = 0.009). The TY of DAE, DBE and SBE were 0.45 (p = 0.00001), 2.20 (p = 0.00001) and 2.36 (p = 0.00001). On comparison of elderly and young patients, DY (1.83; 95% CI: 1.49, 2.24; p = 0.00001) and TY (2.28; 95% CI: 1.79, 2.89) were better in elderly patients. There was no difference in adverse events in both groups (2.16; 95% CI: 0.82, 5.69, p = 0.12). Elderly patients were given less sedation than younger patients during DAE. CONCLUSIONS: DAE has a higher DY and TY in the elderly than younger patients. DAE can be safely carried out in the elderly with less sedation.

Indolent T cell lymphoproliferative disorder with villous atrophy in small intestine diagnosed by single-balloon enteroscopy.

Chronic diarrhea is one of the major symptoms in gastroenterology. However, this may be caused by pathologic conditions for which the diagnosis is critical. Villous atrophy, as an endoscopic lesion, accompanied by chronic diarrhea can occasionally be observed in the patients with inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Herein, we present a case with persistent diarrhea accompanied by intestinal wall thickening without any other significant endoscopic features other than villous atrophy in the jejunum and the ileum, where we diagnosed as an indolent T cell lymphoproliferative disorder (T-LPD) of the GI tract, defined in the 2016-2017 revised World Health Organization classification, via single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE). Interestingly, we found the same lymphocyte infiltration from the distal third portion of the duodenum, where gastroscopy could not reach, via SBE, even though no endoscopic findings were observed such as villous atrophy. Since infiltrating cells in the intestinal tissues were CCR4+, mogamulizumab was administered with resulting durable symptomatic remission for more than 2 years. Patients with persistent diarrhea may have serious small intestinal disorder including not only chronic inflammatory diseases but also lymphoid neoplasmic conditions including T-LPD of GI tract.

Outcomes in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices, Pacemakers, and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators Undergoing Single Balloon Enteroscopy.

OBJECTIVES: Obscure overt gastrointestinal bleeding can be challenging to evaluate in patients with electronic cardiac devices such as continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), pacemakers (PPMs), and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Limited data exist on the utility and safety of single balloon enteroscopy (SBE) in patients with cardiac devices. We aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, diagnostic, and therapeutic outcomes of the aforementioned devices in patients undergoing SBE. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed using the medical records of 57 patients undergoing SBE at our institution from 2010 to 2014. Patients were divided into two groups: those with cardiac devices and those without. Data on comorbidities, complications, findings, diagnostic, and therapeutic yield were compared. t Test and logistic regression assessed the association between dependent and independent variables. For continuous data, the results were summarized as mean difference and standard deviation. For dichotomous data, the results were summarized as odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The overall age in patients with cardiac devices was 67.89 ± 6.96 versus 66.03 ± 11.95 years in the control. The cardiac device group was composed of 42.1% women; the control comprised 21.1% women. There were 19 patients with cardiac devices; 8 (LVAD + ICD), 1 (LVAD + PPM + ICD), 2 (PPM + ICD), 6 (PPM), 2 (ICD); 38 patients were in the control group. Patients with cardiac devices were hospitalized more often than patients without devices; this finding was not statistically significant (odds ratio 1.826, 95% confidence interval 0.544-6.128, P = 0.389). Procedure times were longer in the cardiac device group, 65.16 ± 49.92 minutes, when compared with the control, 57.40 ± 20.42, but it also did not reach statistical significance (mean difference 7.758, 95% confidence interval -11.360 to 26.876, P = 0.049). There was no statistically significant difference in major or minor events between patients with cardiac devices and the control group. Diagnostic and therapeutic yield and rebleeding rates were similar across both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the cardiac device group did not appear to be at any more significant risk than those without cardiac devices. Furthermore, diagnostic and therapeutic yield and rebleeding rates appear to be similar across both groups. Clinicians may perform SBE in these patients safely and effectively, with good overall outcomes.