Slipped capital femoral epiphysis after tumor prosthesis implantation in a patient receiving chemotherapy.

While the usual etiology of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is idiopathic, there are many other factors that increase the predisposition to slippage. Chemotherapy can be one of them. In this article, we report a rare case of acute SCFE after tumor prosthesis implantation in a patient who received chemotherapy. A 10-year-old girl with osteosarcoma of the right distal femur underwent (neo-) adjuvant chemotherapy, wide tumor resection, and reconstruction using a growing tumor prosthesis and a short non-cemented femoral stem. Half a year after implantation, she developed aseptic loosening. Revision surgery was performed using a hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated cementless femoral stem. Postoperative plain radiographs revealed SCFE that was treated by closed reduction and screw fixation. The patient recovered without complications, and unaffected hip showed no radiographic signs of slippage on follow-up. The forces of implanting a tumor prosthesis, particularly with a non-cemented stem, can increase the risk of an acute SCFE. The controversy over prophylactic pinning of the uninvolved hip in chemotherapy-associated SCFE is unresolved. Pinning can be considered only in the presence of abnormal prodromal radiological findings.

Bilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis in a Young Girl Treated With Chemotherapy: A Case Report.

CASE: A 1-year-old girl was treated with chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation because of CD40 ligand deficiency. Four years later, she presented with pain in her right leg, diagnosed as atypical acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis, without a clear cause, besides chemotherapy possibly. She was treated with fixation of the epiphysis with a cannulated screw. Two years later, the same diagnosis was made for the left hip and the same surgery was applied. After the 2-year follow-up, clinical outcomes were good. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy may be a risk factor for atypical slipped capital femoral epiphysis, even without the combination with radiotherapy.

Rate and Risk Factors for Contralateral Slippage in Adolescents Treated for Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Comprehensive Analysis of 3,528 Cases.

BACKGROUND: After a unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), the contralateral hip is at risk for a subsequent SCFE. However, further information with regard to risk factors involved in the development of contralateral SCFE must be investigated. The purpose of this study was to report the rate and risk factors for subsequent contralateral SCFE in adolescents treated for unilateral SCFE by exploring a mix of known and potential risk factors. METHODS: A case-control study utilizing aggregated multi-institutional electronic medical record data between January 2003 and March 2023 was conducted. Patients <18 years of age diagnosed with SCFE who underwent surgical management were included. Variables associated with contralateral SCFE were identified using multivariable logistic regression models that adjusted for patient characteristics and time of the surgical procedure, providing adjusted odds ratios (ORs). The false discovery rate was accounted for via the Benjamini-Hochberg method. RESULTS: In this study, 15.3% of patients developed contralateral SCFE at a mean (and standard error) of 296.53 ± 17.23 days and a median of 190 days following the initial SCFE. Increased thyrotropin (OR, 1.43 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04 to 1.97]; p = 0.022), diabetes mellitus (OR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.22 to 2.49]; p = 0.005), severe obesity (OR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.56 to 2.57]; p < 0.001), history of human growth hormone use (OR, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.10 to 3.38]; p = 0.032), low vitamin D (OR, 5.75 [95% CI, 2.23 to 13.83]; p < 0.001), younger age in boys (under 12 years of age: OR, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.37 to 2.43]; p < 0.001) and in girls (under 11 years of age: OR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.05 to 2.02]; p = 0.026), and tobacco exposure (OR, 2.43 [95% CI, 1.49 to 3.87]; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with increased odds of developing contralateral SCFE. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest study on this topic, we identified the rate, odds, and risk factors associated with development of contralateral SCFE. We found younger age, hypothyroidism, severe obesity, low vitamin D, diabetes mellitus, and a history of human growth hormone use to be independent risk factors. Our findings can aid clinical decision-making in at-risk patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Association of Relative Skeletal Immaturity of the Triradiate Cartilage with Increased Proximal Femoral Deformity in Prophylactic Fixation for Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Radiographic Study.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to describe proximal femoral deformity after contralateral hip prophylactic fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) in patients and the association of relative skeletal immaturity with this deformity. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients presenting with a SCFE was conducted from 2009 to 2015. Inclusion criteria were (1) radiographic evidence of a unilateral SCFE treated with in situ fixation, (2) contralateral prophylactic fixation of an unslipped hip, and (3) at least 3 years of follow-up. Measurements were made on radiographs and included greater trochanter height relative to the center of the femoral head, femoral head-neck offset, and femoral neck length. Skeletal maturity was evaluated by assessing the status of the proximal femoral physis and triradiate cartilage (TRC) of the hip, in addition to the length of time to closure of these physes. Values were compared from initial presentation to final follow-up. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and linear regression. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included. Bivariable linear regression demonstrated that an increased relative trochanteric overgrowth was associated with TRC width (ß = 3.048, R = 0.585, P = 0.001) and an open TRC (ß = -11.400, R = 0.227, P = 0.012). Time to proximal femoral physis closure (ß = 1.963, R = 0.444, P = 0.020) and TRC closure (ß = 1.983, R = 0.486, P = 0.010) were predictive of increased deformity. In addition, multivariable elimination linear regression demonstrated that TRC width (ß = 3.048, R = 0.585, P = 0.001) was predictive of an increased relative trochanteric overgrowth. DISCUSSION: Patients with an open TRC and increased TRC width are associated with increased relative trochanteric overgrowth when undergoing prophylactic fixation for a unilateral SCFE. Increased caution should be exercised when considering contralateral hip prophylactic fixation in skeletally immature patients presenting with a unilateral SCFE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Limited angular remodelling after in-situ fixation for slipped capital femoral epiphysis : A study on radiographs from the Swedish pediatric orthopaedic quality registry for SCFE.

BACKGROUND: In Sweden, most children with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) are operated on with a single smooth pin or a short-threaded screw, allowing further growth of the femoral neck. Using the Swedish Pediatric Orthopaedic Quality registry, SPOQ, we investigated whether angular remodelling occurs adjacent to the proximal femoral epiphysis after fixation of SCFE using implants, allowing continued growth of the femoral neck. METHODS: During 2008-2010 a total national population of 155 children were reported to the SPOQ registry. Following our strict inclusion criteria, radiographs of 51 hips were further assessed. The lateral Head Shaft Angle (HSA), the Nötzli 3-point α-angle, the anatomic α-angle, and the Anterior Offset Ratio (AOR) on the first postoperative radiographs and at follow-up were measured to describe the occurrence of remodelling. Slip severity was categorised as mild, moderate or severe according to postoperative HSA. RESULTS: Mean and SD values for the change in HSA were 3,7° (5,0°), for 3-point α-angle 6,8° (8,9°), and anatomic α-angle 13,0° (16,3°). The overall increase in AOR was 0,038 (0.069). There were no significant differences between the slip severity groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found limited angular remodelling after in situ fixation with smooth pins or short threaded screws for SCFE. The angular remodelling and the reduction of the CAM deformity was less than previously described after fixation of SCFE with similar implants. Results about the same magnitude with non-growth sparing techniques suggest that factors other than longitudinal growth of the femoral neck are important for angular remodelling.

[Evaluation of care for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) in Germany]. / Analyse der Versorgungssituation bei Epiphyseolysis capitis femoris (ECF) in Deutschland.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment concept for slipped capital femoral epiphysis is still controversial. According to studies, there is currently no recommendation for a universal approach. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze the care reality of children with ECF in Germany. METHODS: The evaluation of the study is performed based on a questionnaire sent to physicians tending to ECF in 2021. Data is compared to the literature. RESULTS: 36 of 47 questionnaires sent out were included. Overall, no significant difference in ECF care was proven in terms of annual caseload or the size of hospital. CONCLUSION: A high variance in operative SCFE treatment is reported. According to current literature, the modified Dunn procedure is considered the best therapeutic option to date, especially for patients with severe or chronic ECF. However, compared with alternative care options, this is not feasible in every hospital due to its complicating and challenging nature. Central registration, minimum volume regulation, and expansion of continuing education measures can contribute to optimization.

In situ fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis carries a greater than 40% risk of later total hip arthroplasty during a long-term follow-up.

Aims: We aimed to assess the cumulative risk of total hip arthroplasty (THA) from in situ fixation for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) after a follow-up of almost 50 years. Methods: In this study, 138 patients with 172 affected hips treated with in situ fixation were evaluated retrospectively. A total of 97 patients (70%) were male and the mean age was 13.6 years (SD 2.1); 35 patients (25%) had a bilateral disease. The median follow-up time was 49 years (interquartile range 43 to 55). Basic demographic, stability, and surgical details were obtained from patient records. Preoperative radiographs (slip angle; SA) were measured, and data on THA was gathered from the Finnish National Arthroplasty Register. Results: The preoperative SA was a mean of 39° (SD 19°). At follow-up, 56 of the patients had undergone THA for a hip previously fixed in situ for SCFE (41%) and 64 of all affected hips had been replaced (37%). Kaplan-Meier analysis gave a median prosthesis-free postoperative survival of 55 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 45 to 64) for the affected hips. In a multivariate analysis, female patients had a two-fold risk for THA (hazard ratio (HR) 2.42 (95% CI 1.16 to 5.07)) and a greater preoperative SA increased the risk of THA (HR 1.03 for every increment of 1° (95% CI 1.01 to 1.05)), while patient age at surgery, slip laterality, stability of slip, or diagnostic delay did not have a statistically significant effect on the risk of THA. Conclusion: SCFE treated primarily with in situ fixation may lead to THA in more than 40% of affected hips at a near 50-year follow-up. This risk is approximately 15-times the reported lifetime risk in the Finnish general population. Female sex and increasing preoperative SA significantly predicted higher risk of THA.

Comparison of three radiographic assessment methods for detecting slipped capital femoral epiphyses in cats: Klein's line, modified Klein's line and the S-sign.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether diagnostic assessment methods used on radiographs in humans with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) can be used in cats. METHODS: The ventrodorsal (VD) extended-leg and VD frog-leg pelvic radiographs of 20 cats with SCFE without fully displaced femoral capital epiphyses (FCE), eight cats with fully displaced FCE and five control cats with normal pelvic anatomy were assessed by five observers on two separate occasions 3 months apart. The Klein's line and modified Klein's line were assessed on each VD extended-leg radiograph, and the S-sign was assessed on each VD extended-leg and VD frog-leg radiograph. RESULTS: Excluding cases of fully displaced FCE, the S-sign on the VD frog-leg radiographs more accurately diagnosed SCFE than the S-sign on the VD extended-leg radiographs and the Klein's line (92.4% vs 88.8% vs 60.6%, respectively), and had the greatest sensitivity (93.9% vs 79.2% vs 30.6%, respectively). The S-sign on the VD extended-leg radiographs had greater specificity than the Klein's line and S-sign on the VD frog-leg radiographs (99.2% vs 97.9% vs 90.9%, respectively). The modified Klein's line detected SCFE in 40.2% of cases that were negative for the Klein's line. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The S-sign in both VD extended-leg and VD frog-leg views successfully detected SCFE in cats and can be used to increase early diagnosis and treatment in cats with SCFE that have only subtle radiographic changes.

[Clinical aspects of imaging the hip in infants, children and adolescents]. / Klinische Aspekte zur Bildgebung der kindlichen und adoleszenten Hüfte.

When a child with a hip problem is clinically evaluated, it is usually possible to make a presumptive diagnosis which is subsequently confirmed. The most important tool for confirmation in pediatric hip disorders is radiological imaging. Vice versa changes on sonogram, native X­ray or magnetic resonance images (MRI) can often only be interpreted when the history and current clinical findings are known. In this constellation, it is desirable that all colleagues who are confronted with a child's hip problem know the most common and important pediatric hip disorders and use the same terminology. The aim of this article is to present a short outline of the pathogenesis and clinical aspects of congenital and neurogenic hip dysplasia, coxitis fugax, septic coxitis, Perthes' disease, infantile and adolescent femoroacetabular impingement, apophysiolyses, and slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients?

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the radiological parameters of developing subsequent contralateral slips in unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) patients at the time of initial presentation. METHODS: The study group included the review of unilateral SCFE patients treated between June 2007 and August 2018. Age, gen-der, side, stability, posterior slope angle, grade of slip, modified Oxford bone age score (mOBAS), the Risser classification, and the ap-pearance of the triradiate cartilage were evaluated retrospectively. Data were analyzed between two groups: subsequent contralateral SCFE (SCFESC) patients that developed contralateral slip during follow-up and unilateral SCFE (SCFEU) patients that did not develop contralateral slip up to skeletal maturity. Descriptive statistics were used to compare risk factors between groups. RESULTS: This study included 48 patients and 6 patients (12.5%) developed a SCFESC. Only mOBAS was significantly different be-tween groups. The mOBAS scores in SCFESC were 18 in 2 patients (33.3%), 19 in 4 patients (66.7%). The mOBAS scores in SCFEU were 18 in 1 patient (2.4%), 19 in 24 patients (57.1%), and >20 in 17 patients (40.5%). In the SCFESC group, all patients had a Risser score of 0 and all had open triradiate cartilage. CONCLUSION: Patients with unilateral SCFE are at risk for SCFESC, and the mOBAS is the best predictor of risk assessment. We agree that mOBAS score of 16,17 or 18 patients' contralateral hips can be prophylactically pinned. We also suggest pinning or close screening of mOBAS 19 patients that some carry relatively high risk of subsequent contralateral slip.

[Slipped capital femoral epiphysis]. / Epiphyseolysis capitis femoris.

BACKGROUND: In slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), the femoral head slides in an anterosuperior direction along the growth plate. The femoral head remains in the acetabulum. The pathogenesis of SCFE is multifactorial. An important predisposing factor is obesity. PROBLEM: Epiphysiolysis can compromise the blood supply to the epiphysis and osteonecrosis of the femoral head may result. DIAGNOSTICS AND PROGNOSIS: Conventional radiography represents the first diagnostic step. The long-term prognosis of the disease depends on the residual deformity of the femoral head and in the worst case may result in early osteoarthritis of the hip joint.

Surgeon Preference for Prophylactic Contralateral Fixation in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE) Patients: A Nationwide POSNA Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that 11% to 60% of unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) patients will develop contralateral pathology, usually within 18 months after the first event. Despite this, prophylactic fixation remains controversial, and there is significant variability in surgeon preferences. Thus, this study aimed to determine which factors predict surgeon preferences for prophylactic contralateral pinning in SCFE patients. METHODS: We designed a survey for pediatric orthopedic surgeons to collect data on (1) surgeon and hospital characteristics, (2) individual preference for contralateral SCFE pinning in three disparate hypothetical scenarios, and (3) personal risk-aversion traits. The questionnaire was distributed across the United States by the POSNA Evidence-Based Orthopaedics Committee. All POSNA members were eligible to respond. We performed analyses to evaluate the role of patient risk factors in hypothetical surgical decision-making and to determine if surgical training, hospital characteristics, and geographic region influenced prophylactic pinning in a surgeon's real-life practice. RESULTS: A total of 126 POSNA members responded to the survey. In the last year, a median of 6.5 SCFE patients was seen per surgeon (1243 patients total). A median of 10% of those patients underwent prophylactic contralateral fixation. In multiple analyses, surgeons were influenced by body mass index, open triradiate cartilage, patient race, various endocrine abnormalities, and specific radiographic measurements when deciding to fix the contralateral side prophylactically. Moreover, in multivariate regression, more years in practice and a hospital size of 500+ beds predicted fewer prophylactic fixation procedures (all P <0.05). Surgeons practicing in the South Atlantic, New England, and Mountain regions of the United States estimated the highest rate of contralateral pinning. CONCLUSIONS: This study's findings suggest that multiple factors influence surgeons' decisions to prophylactically fix the contralateral side in SCFE patients. Surgical training, hospital characteristics, and geographical regions played a role in decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Free-gliding screw fixation in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: potentially growing im-plants for symptomatic and prophylactic pinning.

INTRODUCTION: In situ fixation is the gold standard for mild and moderate slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) cases. The condition is associated with a low percentage of avascular necrosis and chondrolysis.[1] The present study examines the postoperative femoral neck remodelling and implant elongation in cases of therapeutic and prophylactic in situ fixation using the free-gliding screw system. AIM: The aim of our study was to assess the postoperative femoral neck growth and evaluate the biomechanical evolution and complication's rate for 19 therapeutic and 11 prophylactic in situ fixations with a free-gliding screw. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured the preoperative and postoperative articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD), alpha angle (α angle) and screw elongation in symptomatic hips and in contralateral hips with prophylactic fixation. We compared the radiographic param-eters of 30 hips. RESULTS: ATD remains approximately the same for symptomatic cases, whereas it increases for prophylactic fixated hip. Screw elongates in both group with statistically higher value for the prophylactic group. The alpha angle remains pathological in these cases with a mean value of 67.12±4.62°, but decreases for group II. Screw elongates by a mean value of 3.14±2.74 mm for group I and 6.78±8.81 mm for group II. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic in situ fixation with free-gliding screws does not affect the proximal femoral growth (ATD), and does not decrease the alpha angle significantly. Screw elongates statistically in both groups, but more significantly for group II. For symptomatic hips, the in situ fixation allows the femoral neck to grow with ATD preserved, but significantly less than in group II. The alpha angle decreases but remains pathological.

Effects of joint loading on the development of capital femoral epiphysis morphology.

INTRODUCTION: The deleterious influence of increased mechanical forces on capital femoral epiphysis development is well established; however, the growth of the physis in the absence of such forces remains unclear. The hips of non-ambulatory cerebral palsy (CP) patients provide a weight-restricted (partial weightbearing) model which can elucidate the influence of decreased mechanical forces on the development of physis morphology, including features related to development of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Here we used 3D image analysis to compare the physis morphology of children with non-ambulatory CP, as a model for abnormal hip loading, with age-matched native hips. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT images of 98 non-ambulatory CP hips (8-15 years) and 80 age-matched native control hips were used to measure height, width, and length of the tubercle, depth, width, and length of the metaphyseal fossa, and cupping height across different epiphyseal regions. The impact of age on morphology was assessed using Pearson correlations. Mixed linear model was used to compare the quantified morphological features between partial weightbearing hips and full weightbearing controls. RESULTS: In partial weightbearing hips, tubercle height and length along with fossa depth and length significantly decreased with age, while peripheral cupping height increased with age (r > 0.2, P < 0.04). Compared to normally loaded (full weightbearing) hips and across all age groups, partially weightbearing hips' epiphyseal tubercle height and length were smaller (P < .05), metaphyseal fossa depth was larger (P < .01), and posterior, inferior, and anterior peripheral cupping heights were smaller (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Smaller epiphyseal tubercle and peripheral cupping with greater metaphyseal fossa size in partial weightbearing hips suggests that the growing capital femoral epiphysis requires mechanical stimulus to adequately develop epiphyseal stabilizers. Deposit low prevalence and relevance of SCFE in CP, these findings highlight both the role of normal joint loading in proper physis development and how chronic abnormal loading may contribute to various pathomorphological changes of the proximal femur (i.e., capital femoral epiphysis).

Who Benefits From Allowing the Physis to Grow in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis?

BACKGROUND: The globally acknowledged treatment for mild to moderate slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is single screw in situ fixation, also used for prophylactic contralateral fixation. The Free-Gliding Screw (FG; Pega Medical) is a 2-part free-extending screw system designed to allow the growth of the proximal femur. We aimed to analyze the relationship between skeletal maturity and potential growth of the proximal physis and remodeling of the femoral neck using this implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Females below 12 years and males below 14 years undergoing in situ fixation for stable SCFE or prophylactic fixation were treated using the implant. Three elements of the modified Oxford Bone (mOB 3 ) score were used to measure maturity (triradiate cartilage, head of the femur, and greater trochanter). Radiographs were analyzed immediately postoperatively and at a minimum of 2 years for a change in screw length, posterior-sloping angle, articulotrochanteric distance, α angle, and head-neck offset. RESULTS: The study group comprised 30 (F:M=12:18) of 39 hips treated with SCFE and 22 (F:M=13:9) of 29 hips managed prophylactically using the free-Gliding screw. In the therapeutic group, chronologic age was a less valuable predictor of future screw lengthening than mOB 3 . An mOB 3 of ≤13 predicted future growth of >6 mm but did not reach statistical significance ( P =0.07). Patients with open triradiates showed a mean screw lengthening of 6.6 mm compared with those with closed triradiates (4.0 mm), but this did not reach significance ( P =0.12). In those with mOB 3 ≤13, the α angle reduced significantly ( P <0.01) and the head-neck offset increased significantly, suggesting remodeling. There was no change in these parameters when mOB 3 ≥14. In the prophylactic group, change in screw length was significant with mOB 3 of ≤13 (mean=8.0 mm, P <0.05), as was the presence of an open triradiate cartilage (mean=7.7 mm, P <0.05). In both cohorts, posterior-sloping angle and articulotrochanteric distance did not change, indicating no slip progression in either treatment or prophylactic groups and minimal effect on the proximal physeal growth relative to the greater trochanter. CONCLUSIONS: Growing screw constructs can halt slip progression while allowing proximal femoral growth in young patients with SCFE. Ongoing growth is better when the implant is used for prophylactic fixation. The results in treated SCFE need to be expanded to demonstrate a clinically meaningful cut-off for significant growth, but SCFE patients with an open triradiate remodel significantly more than those where it is closed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

A Comparison Between 3 Functional Hip Scores for Evaluation of the Pediatric Hip.

BACKGROUND: This investigation aimed to determine the degree of correlation among 3 functional scales for evaluating the hip in pediatric patients and determine the correlation between measures of global function and outcome. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 173 consecutive patients (M age = 13 ± 3 y) being followed for developmental dysplasia of the hip (n = 122, 71%), slipped capital femoral epiphysis (n = 31, 18%), or Legg-Calve-Perthes disease (n = 20, 12%). We evaluated patients clinically, and we compiled scores for the Iowa Hip Score (IHS), Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Children's Hospital Oakland Hip Evaluation Scale (CHOHES). Patients concomitantly completed the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) at the same clinic visit. We assessed Global Functioning Scale the and the Sports and Physical Functioning Core Scale of the PODCI. We determined the degree of correlation between the functional hip scales and between each scale and the PODCI scales using Spearman rank correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The correlations between the IHS, HHS, and CHOHES scores were robust (IHS and HHS ρ = 0.991; IHS and CHOHES ρ = 0.933; HHS and CHOHES ρ = 0.938; all P < 0.001). The correlation between the Global Functioning Scale of the PODCI and the 3 hip scores was ρ = 0.343 for the IHS, ρ = 0.341 for the HHS, and ρ = 0.352 for the CHOHES (all P < 0.001). The correlation between the sports and physical functioning core scale of the PODCI and the 3 hip scores was ρ = 0.324 for the IHS, ρ = 0.329 for the HHS, and ρ = 0.346 for the CHOHES (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a pediatric population with diverse hip pathology, there was a very strong correlation between scores on the IHS, HHS, and CHOHES. However, none of these 3 most commonly used hip scores correlated strongly with the global functioning scale or sports and physical functioning core scale of the PODCI. The most frequently used scores to determine the outcome of pediatric patients with hip pathology correlate strongly with each other but do not necessarily relate to global functional results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

The Free-Gliding screw for slipped capital femoral epiphysis : is it safe, does it glide, and does age matter?

AIMS: Fixation techniques used in the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) that allow continued growth of the femoral neck, rather than inducing epiphyseal fusion in situ, have the advantage of allowing remodelling of the deformity. The aims of this study were threefold: to assess whether the Free-Gliding (FG) SCFE screw prevents further slip; to establish whether, in practice, it enables lengthening and gliding; and to determine whether the age of the patient influences the extent of glide. METHODS: All patients with SCFE who underwent fixation using FG SCFE screws after its introduction at our institution, with minimum three years' follow-up, were reviewed retrospectively as part of ongoing governance. All pre- and postoperative radiographs were evaluated. The demographics of the patients, the grade of slip, the extent of lengthening of the barrel of the screw and the restoration of Klein's line were recorded. Subanalysis was performed according to sex and age. RESULTS: A total of 19 hips in 13 patients were included. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 11.5 years (9 to 13) and the mean follow-up was 63 months (45 to 83). A total of 13 FG SCFE screws were used for the fixation of mild or moderate SCFE, with six contralateral prophylactic fixations. No hip with SCFE showed a further slip after fixation and there were no complications. Lengthening occurred in 15 hips (79%), with a mean lengthening of the barrel of 6.8 mm (2.5 to 13.6) at final follow-up. Remodelling occurred in all hips with lengthening of the barrel. There was statistically more lengthening in patients who were aged < 12 years, regardless of sex (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The FG SCFE screw is effective in preventing further slip in patients with SCFE. Lengthening of the barrel occurred in most hips, and thus allowed remodelling. This was most marked in younger children, regardless of sex. Based on this study, this device should be considered for use in patients with SCFE aged < 12 years instead of standard pinning in situ.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):215-219.

Smaller epiphyseal tubercle in hips with slipped capital femoral epiphysis compared to the uninvolved contralateral hip.

Recent investigations suggest that physeal morphologic features have a major role in the capital femoral epiphysis stability and slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) pathology, with a smaller epiphyseal tubercle and larger peripheral cupping of the femoral epiphysis being present in hips with progressive SCFE compared to healthy controls. Yet, little is known on the causal versus remodeling nature of these associations. This study aimed to use preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patients with unilateral SCFE to perform a comparison of the morphology of the epiphyseal tubercle, metaphyseal fossa, and peripheral cupping in hips with SCFE versus the contralateral uninvolved hips. Preoperative MRIs from 22 unilateral SCFE patients were used to quantify the morphological features of the epiphyseal tubercle (height, width, and length), metaphyseal fossa (depth, width, and length), and peripheral cupping height in three dimension. The quantified anatomical features were compared between hips with SCFE and the contralateral uninvolved side across the whole cohort and within SCFE severity subgroups using paired t-test. We found significantly smaller epiphyseal tubercle heights (p < 0.001) across all severities of SCFE when compared to their uninvolved contralateral side. There was a marginally smaller metaphyseal fossa length (p = 0.05) in SCFE hips compared to their contralateral uninvolved hips, with mild SCFE hips specifically having smaller fossa and epiphyseal lengths (p < 0.05) than their contralateral uninvolved side. There were no side-to-side differences in any other features of the epiphyseal tubercle, metaphyseal fossa and peripheral cupping across all severities (p > 0.05). These findings suggest a potential causal role of epiphyseal tubercle in SCFE pathogenesis.