Impact of transcranial electrical stimulation on simultaneous stereoelectroencephalography recordings: A randomized sham-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical exploitation of transcranial electrical stimulation for focal epilepsy treatment lacks quantification of the underlying neurophysiological changes. This study explores the immediate effects of transcranial alternating (tACS) and direct (tDCS) current stimulation on local and network brain activity using simultaneous stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) recordings. METHODS: Patients were randomized for personalized tACS (n = 5) or tDCS (n = 6). Active stimulation (20 min) was preceded by sham stimulation (20 min). Changes in interictal epileptiform discharges (IED), functional connectivity (FC) and power spectral density (PSD) were quantified against baseline. RESULTS: Results demonstrated variable responses. Spike rate decreased in 2/6 subjects following sham and tDCS, while 2/6 showed an increase. Alpha power and aperiodic PSD components generally increased during and after tDCS but decreased following tACS. FC changes varied among subjects and were detectable even during sham sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Strong variability suggests that tES does not have a univocal effect on immediate changes in IED or FC, possibly due to the single session format and challenges in affecting subcortical areas. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study to examine intracranial FC changes during tACS and tDCS, highlighting the importance of sham comparisons and individual variability in tES response, offering valuable insights into its application for epilepsy treatment.

Vagus nerve stimulation in lesional and Non-Lesional Drug-Resistant focal onset epilepsies.

PURPOSE: Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) affects one-third of patients with focal epilepsy. A large portion of patients are not candidates for epilepsy surgery, thus alternative options, such as vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), are proposed. Our objective is to study the effect of vagus nerve stimulation on lesional versus non-lesional epilepsies. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study in a single center in London, Ontario, which includes patients with DRE implanted with VNS, implanted between 1997-2018 and the date of analysis is December 2023. PARTICIPANTS: Patients implanted with VNS were classified by lesional (VNS-L) and non-lesional (VNS-NL) based on their MRI head findings. We further subdivided the VNS groups into patients with VNS alone versus those who also had additional epilepsy surgeries. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients were enrolled in the VNS-L, compared to 29 in the VNS-NL. The median age of the patients in the study was 31.8 years, 29.31 % were men (N = 17). 41.4 % (n = 12) of the patients were VNS responders (≥50 % seizure reduction) in the VNS-L group compared to 62.0 % (n = 18) in the VNS-NL group (p = 0.03). When other epilepsy surgeries were combined with VNS in the VNS-L group, the median rate of seizure reduction was greater (72.4 (IQR 97.17-45.88) than the VNS-NL group 53.9 (IQR 92.22-27.92); p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: VNS is a therapeutic option for patients with lesional epilepsy, with slightly inferior results compared to patients with non-lesional epilepsy. Patients implanted with VNS showed higher seizure reduction rates if they had previous epilepsy surgeries. This study demonstrates that VNS in lesional epilepsies can be an effective treatment.

Epilepsia partialis continua: A review.

Epilepsia partialis continua (EPC) is a rare type of focal motor seizure characterized by continuous, involuntary muscle contractions in a specific part of the body. These contractions usually involve rhythmic, twitching movements and can last for several hours to days. The seizures are usually limited to one part of the body and can be clonic or dystonic. EPC can affect people of all ages but is more common in children and adolescents. The pathophysiology of EPC is complex and depends on the cause. There are several possible causes of EPC including structural brain abnormalities, infections, metabolic and genetic disorders, inflammatory conditions, traumatic brain injury, and vascular causes. The work-up of EPC includes electroencephalography (EEG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, position emission tomography (PET) scan of the brain, autoimmune antibodies, infection work-up, and metabolic and genetic work-up. The management of EPC can be challenging. Antiseizure medications (ASDs) including benzodiazepines are an integral part of the management of EPC. Immunotherapy trials are recommended in resistant cases. Epilepsy surgery is one of the effective modalities in some surgically amenable cases. This article reviews the topic of EPC and summarizes diagnostic and .treatment recommendations.

Current challenges in focal epilepsy treatment: An Italian Delphi consensus.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy, a globally prevalent neurological condition, presents distinct challenges in management, particularly for focal-onset types. This study aimed at addressing the current challenges and perspectives in focal epilepsy management, with focus on the Italian reality. METHODS: Using the Delphi methodology, this research collected and analyzed the level of consensus of a panel of Italian epilepsy experts on key aspects of focal epilepsy care. Areas of focus included patient flow, treatment pathways, controlled versus uncontrolled epilepsy, follow-up protocols, and the relevance of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). This method allowed for a comprehensive assessment of consensus and divergences in clinical opinions and practices. RESULTS: The study achieved consensus on 23 out of 26 statements, with three items failing to reach a consensus. There was strong agreement on the importance of timely intervention, individualized treatment plans, regular follow-ups at Epilepsy Centers, and the role of PROs in clinical practice. In cases of uncontrolled focal epilepsy, there was a clear inclination to pursue alternative treatment options following the failure of two previous therapies. Divergent views were evident on the inclusion of epilepsy surgery in treatment for uncontrolled epilepsy and the routine necessity of EEG evaluations in follow-ups. Other key findings included concerns about the lack of pediatric-specific research limiting current therapeutic options in this patient population, insufficient attention to the transition from pediatric to adult care, and need for improved communication. The results highlighted the complexities in managing epilepsy, with broad consensus on patient care aspects, yet notable divergences in specific treatment and management approaches. CONCLUSION: The study offered valuable insights into the current state and complexities of managing focal-onset epilepsy. It highlighted many deficiencies in the therapeutic pathway of focal-onset epilepsy in the Italian reality, while it also underscored the importance of patient-centric care, the necessity of early and appropriate intervention, and individualized treatment approaches. The findings also called for continued research, policy development, and healthcare system improvements to enhance epilepsy management, highlighting the ongoing need for tailored healthcare solutions in this evolving field.

Racial disparities in the utilization of invasive neuromodulation devices for the treatment of drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

Racial disparities affect multiple dimensions of epilepsy care including epilepsy surgery. This study aims to further explore these disparities by determining the utilization of invasive neuromodulation devices according to race and ethnicity in a multicenter study of patients living with focal drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). We performed a post hoc analysis of the Human Epilepsy Project 2 (HEP2) data. HEP2 is a prospective study of patients living with focal DRE involving 10 sites distributed across the United States. There were no statistical differences in the racial distribution of the study population compared to the US population using census data except for patients reporting more than one race. Of 154 patients enrolled in HEP2, 55 (36%) underwent invasive neuromodulation for DRE management at some point in the course of their epilepsy. Of those, 36 (71%) were patients who identified as White. Patients were significantly less likely to have a device if they identified solely as Black/African American than if they did not (odds ratio = .21, 95% confidence interval = .05-.96, p = .03). Invasive neuromodulation for management of DRE is underutilized in the Black/African American population, indicating a new facet of racial disparities in epilepsy care.

Feasibility study of microburst VNS therapy in drug-resistant focal and generalized epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) at low frequencies (≤30 Hz) has been an established treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) for over 25 years. OBJECTIVE: To examine the initial safety and efficacy performance of an investigational, high-frequency (≥250 Hz) VNS paradigm herein called "Microburst VNS" (µVNS). µVNS consists of short, high-frequency bursts of electrical pulses believed to preferentially modulate certain brain regions. METHODS: Thirty-three (33) participants were enrolled into an exploratory feasibility study, 21 with focal-onset seizures and 12 with generalized-onset seizures. Participants were titrated to a personalized target dose of µVNS using an investigational fMRI protocol. Participants were then followed for up to 12 months, with visits every 3 months, and monitored for side-effects at all time points. This study was registered as NCT03446664 on February 27th, 2018. RESULTS: The device was well-tolerated. Reported adverse events were consistent with typical low frequency VNS outcomes and tended to diminish in severity over time, including dysphonia, cough, dyspnea, and implant site pain. After 12 months of µVNS, the mean seizure frequency reduction for all seizures was 61.3% (median reduction: 70.4%; 90% CI of median: 48.9%-83.3%). The 12-month responder rate (≥50% reduction) was 63.3% (90% CI: 46.7%-77.9%) and the super-responder rate (≥80% reduction) was 40% (90% CI: 25.0%-56.6%). Participants with focal-onset seizures appeared to benefit similarly to participants with generalized-onset seizures (mean reduction in seizures at 12 months: 62.6% focal [n = 19], versus 59.0% generalized [n = 11]). CONCLUSION: Overall, µVNS appears to be safe and potentially a promising therapeutic alternative to traditional VNS. It merits further investigation in randomized controlled trials which will help determine the impact of investigational variables and which patients are most suitable for this novel therapy.

Ictal Asystole During Focal Seizures Due to Left Occipital Glioneuronal Tumor: A Report of Case Treated With Cardiac Neuromodulation.

Ictal asystole (IA) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of focal epilepsy. The sudden onset of loss of consciousness and drop attacks in a patient with chronic epilepsy should suggest the possibility of this complication. Once the diagnosis is established, rapid management should be considered, especially in high-risk cases. The approach does not differ between temporal and extratemporal lobe epilepsies. Strategies can be aimed at preventing the emergence of cortical epileptic activity from the beginning (surgery, antiseizure therapy), neutralizing negative chronotropic effects on the heart (cardiac neuromodulation), or restarting the heart rhythm with a pacemaker. Pacemaker implantation is not a completely complication-free treatment, and living with a device that requires care and follow-up throughout life makes alternative treatment methods more valid for young patients with many years to live or cases that could benefit from surgery. In this article, we present a patient with a left occipital glioneuronal tumor and drug-resistant occipital lobe epilepsy. IA was documented by long-term video EEG monitoring (VEM). During about 2 years of follow-up after a cardiac neuromodulation procedure, there were no drop attacks or asystole with seizures, confirmed by long-term VEM.

Insights From Chronic ECoG by RNS.

SUMMARY: The NeuroPace responsive neurostimulation system (RNS) has revolutionized the care of patients suffering from focal epilepsy since its approval in 2014. One major advantage of this device is its innate ability to gather long-term electrocorticographic (ECoG) data that the device uses in its novel closed-loop treatment paradigm. Beyond the standard stimulation treatments, which have been demonstrated to be safe and well-tolerated, the data collected by the RNS provide valuable information, such as the long-term circadian and ultradian variations that affect seizure risk, obtained under naturalistic conditions. Additionally, these data inform future surgical procedures, supplementing clinically reported seizures by patients, assessing the response to newly added anti-seizure medications, helping to forecast the risk of future seizures, and understanding the mechanisms of certain long-term outcomes in patients with postsurgical epilepsy. By leveraging these data, the delivery of high-quality clinical care for patients with epilepsy can only be enhanced. Finally, these data open significant avenues of research, including machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms, which may also translate to improved outcomes in patients who struggle with recurrent seizures.

Functional connectomic profile correlates with effective anterior thalamic stimulation for refractory epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT-DBS) is an effective treatment for refractory epilepsy; however, seizure outcome varies among individuals. Identifying a reliable noninvasive biomarker to predict good responders would be helpful. OBJECTIVES: To test whether the functional connectivity between the ANT-DBS sites and the seizure foci correlates with effective seizure control in refractory epilepsy. METHODS: We performed a proof-of-concept pilot study of patients with focal refractory epilepsy receiving ANT-DBS. Using normative human connectome data derived from 1000 healthy participants, we investigated whether intrinsic functional connectivity between the seizure foci and the DBS site was associated with seizure outcome. We repeated this analysis controlling for the extent of seizure foci, distance between the seizure foci and DBS site, and using functional connectivity of the ANT instead of the DBS site to test the contribution of variance in DBS sites. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with two or more seizure foci were included. Greater functional connectivity between the seizure foci and the DBS site correlated with more favorable outcome. The degree of functional connectivity accounted for significant variance in clinical outcomes (DBS site: |r| = 0.773, p < 0.001 vs ANT-atlas: |r| = 0.715, p = 0.001), which remained significant when controlling for the extent of the seizure foci (|r| = 0.773, p < 0.001) and the distance between the seizure foci and DBS site (|r| = 0.777, p < 0.001). Significant correlations were independent of variance in the DBS sites (|r| = 0.148, p = 0.57). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that functional connectomic profile is a potential reliable non-invasive biomarker to predict ANT-DBS outcomes. Accordingly, the identification of ANT responders could decrease the surgical risk for patients who may not benefit and optimize the cost-effective allocation of health care resources.

Focal Cortex Stimulation With a Novel Implantable Device and Antiseizure Outcomes in 2 Prospective Multicenter Single-Arm Trials.

Importance: For the large population of people with drug-refractory epilepsy, alternative treatment approaches are needed. Clinical trial outcomes of a novel stimulation device, which is newly available in Europe for the treatment of patients with a predominant seizure focus, are reported for the first time. Objective: To perform a pooled analysis of the results of 2 prospective, multicenter, single-arm trials, A Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility of Neurostimulation With the EASEE System to Treat Medically Refractory Focal Epilepsy (EASEE II) and A Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility of Patient-Controlled Neurostimulation With the EASEE System to Treat Medically Refractory Focal Epilepsy (PIMIDES I), assessing the safety and efficacy of epicranial focal cortex stimulation (FCS) with a novel implantable device (EASEE [Precisis]) as adjunctive treatment for adult patients with drug-refractory focal epilepsy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was a pooled analysis of 2 nonrandomized uncontrolled trials, EASEE II and PIMIDES I, which began on January 15, 2019, and January 14, 2020, respectively, and ended on July 28, 2021. EASEE II and PIMIDES I were the first in-human, prospective, single-arm trials with an 8-month evaluation period. Patients were recruited at 7 European epilepsy centers. Consecutive participants with drug-refractory focal epilepsy were enrolled. Study data were analyzed from September 29, 2021, to February 2, 2022. Interventions: After a 1-month prospective baseline period, patients were implanted with the neurostimulation device. After a 1-month postimplantation recovery period, unblinded FCS was activated using both high-frequency and direct current (DC)-like components performed via electrode arrays placed epicranially above the individual epileptic focus region. Main Outcomes and Measures: Efficacy was prospectively assessed by the responder rate in the sixth month of stimulation compared with baseline; safety and additional end points were assessed after device implantation and during the stimulation period. Results: Of the 34 adult patients enrolled at 6 German and 1 Belgian investigational site, 33 (mean [SD] age, 34.6 [13.5] years; 18 male patients [54.5%]) received the neurostimulation device implant. A total of 32 patients underwent combined high-frequency direct current-like stimulation at least until the 8-month postimplant follow-up visit. After 6 months of stimulation, 17 of 32 patients (53.1%) were responders to treatment with at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency compared with baseline, corresponding to a significant median seizure reduction by 52% (95% CI, 0.37%-0.76%; P < .001). No device- or procedure-related serious adverse events were reported (0; 95% CI, 0%-10.58%). There were no significant alterations in cognition, mood, or overall quality of life. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this pooled analysis of 2 nonrandomized uncontrolled trials suggest that FCS with a novel neurostimulation device was associated with an effective reduction in seizure frequency in patients with drug-refractory focal epilepsy and may offer a promising treatment option for patients with a predominant epileptic focus. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00015918 and DRKS00017833, respectively, and jointly under PROSPERO: CRD42021266440.

Neuro-stimulation in focal epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Different neurostimulation modalities are available to treat drug-resistant focal epilepsy when surgery is not an option including vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Head-to-head comparisons of efficacy do not exist between them nor are likely to be available in the future. We performed a meta-analysis on VNS, RNS, and DBS outcomes to compare seizure reduction efficacy for focal epilepsy. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the literature for reported seizure outcomes following implantation with VNS, RNS, and DBS in focal-onset seizures and performed a meta-analysis. Prospective or retrospective clinical studies were included. RESULTS: Sufficient data were available at years one (n = 642, two (n = 480), and three (n = 385) for comparing the three modalities with each other. Seizure reduction for the devices at years one, two, and three respectively were: RNS: 66.3%, 56.0%, 68.4%; DBS- 58.4%, 57.5%, 63.8%; VNS 32.9%, 44.4%, 53.5%. Seizure reduction at year one was greater for RNS (p < 0.01) and DBS (p < 0.01) compared to VNS. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate the seizure reduction efficacy of RNS is similar to DBS, and both had greater seizure reductions compared to VNS in the first-year post-implantation, with the differences diminishing with longer-term follow-up. SIGNIFICANCE: The results help guide neuromodulation treatment in eligible patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

Therapeutical impacts of transcranial direct current stimulation on drug-resistant epilepsy in pediatric patients: A double-blind parallel-group randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Drug-resistant epilepsy is a challenging problem in pediatrics. Transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) is a non-invasive neurostimulation technique suggested as a promising method for treating epilepsy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of TDCS in focal epilepsy in children with drug-resistant epilepsy. METHOD: We conducted a randomized sham-controlled study with 18 subjects between 6 and 16 years of age, divided equally into two groups. TDCS was performed in 20-minute daily stimulation protocol for five days for both groups. The current intensity was one mA for the first three days, increasing to 1.5 mA on day four and 2 mA on the last day of stimulation. EEG was done before and after the intervention. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in seizure duration in the case group compared with the sham group. CONCLUSION: five consecutive days of performing TDCS significantly reduced seizure duration in children with focal Drug-resistant epilepsy. However,further studies in this field are necessary to test the effectiveness and set up a coherent and comprehensive protocol.

Personalized, Multisession, Multichannel Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Medication-Refractory Focal Epilepsy: An Open-Label Study.

PURPOSE: Animal and proof-of-principle human studies suggest that cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation may suppress seizures in drug-resistant focal epilepsy. The present study tests the safety, tolerability, and effect size of repeated daily cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in epilepsy have not been established, limiting development of clinically meaningful interventions. METHODS: We conducted a 2-center, open-label study on 20 participants with medically refractory, focal epilepsy, aged 9 to 56 years (11 women and 9 children younger than18 years). Each participant underwent 10 sessions of 20 minutes of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over 2 weeks. Multielectrode montages were designed using a realistic head model-driven approach to conduct an inhibitory electric field to the target cortical seizure foci and surrounding cortex to suppress excitability and reduce seizure rates. Patients recorded daily seizures using a seizure diary 8 weeks prior, 2 weeks during, and 8 to 12 weeks after the stimulation period. RESULTS: The median seizure reduction was 44% relative to baseline and did not differ between adult and pediatric patients. Three patients experienced an increase in seizure frequency of >50% during the stimulation period; in one, a 36% increase in seizure frequency persisted through 12 weeks of follow-up. Otherwise, participants experienced only minor adverse events-the most common being scalp discomfort during transcranial direct current stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study supports the safety and efficacy of multifocal, personalized, multichannel, cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation for adult and pediatric patients with medication-refractory focal epilepsy, although identifies a possibility of seizure exacerbation in some. The data also provide insight into the effect size to inform the design of a randomized, sham-stimulation controlled trial.

Using chronic recordings from a closed-loop neurostimulation system to capture seizures across multiple thalamic nuclei.

We report the case of a patient with unilateral diffuse frontotemporal epilepsy in whom we implanted a responsive neurostimulation system with leads spanning the anterior and centromedian nucleus of the thalamus. During chronic recording, ictal activity in the centromedian nucleus consistently preceded the anterior nucleus, implying a temporally organized seizure network involving the thalamus. With stimulation, the patient had resolution of focal impaired awareness seizures and secondarily generalized seizures. This report describes chronic recordings of seizure activity from multiple thalamic nuclei within a hemisphere and demonstrates the potential efficacy of closed-loop neurostimulation of multiple thalamic nuclei to control seizures.

Deep brain stimulation of the anterior nuclei of the thalamus in focal epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: To review the therapeutic effects of deep brain stimulation of the anterior nuclei of the thalamus (ANT-DBS) and the predictors of its effectiveness, safety, and adverse effects. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the medical literature (PubMed) was conducted to identify relevant articles investigating ANT-DBS therapy for epilepsy. Out of 332 references, 77 focused on focal epilepsies were reviewed. RESULTS: The DBS effect is probably due to decreased synchronization of epileptic activity in the cortex. The potential mechanisms from cellular to brain network levels are presented. The ANT might participate actively in the network elaborating focal seizures. The effects of ANT-DBS differed in various studies; ANT-DBS was linked with a 41% seizure frequency reduction at 1 year, 69% at 5 years, and 75% at 7 years. The most frequently reported adverse effects, depression and memory impairment, were considered non-serious in the long-term follow-up view. ANT-DBS also has been used in a few cases to treat status epilepticus. CONCLUSIONS: We reviewed the clinical literature and identified several factors that may predict seizure outcome following DBS therapy. More large-scale trials are required since there is a need to explore stimulation settings, apply patient-tailored therapy, and identify the presurgical predictors of patient response. SIGNIFICANCE: A critical review of the published literature on ANT-DBS in focal epilepsy is presented. ANT-DBS mechanisms are not fully understood; possible explanations are provided. Biomarkers of ANT-DBS effectiveness may lead to patient-tailored therapy.

Repeated long sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation reduces seizure frequency in patients with refractory focal epilepsy: An open-label extension study.

OBJECTIVE: Although clinical trials have demonstrated that cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is effective for seizure reduction, its long-term efficacy is unknown. This study aimed to determine the long-term effects of repeated cathodal long tDCS sessions on seizure suppression in patients with refractory epilepsy. METHODS: Patients were recruited to participate in an extended phase of a previous randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, three-arm, parallel, multicenter study on tDCS. The patients were divided into an active tDCS group (20 min of tDCS per day) and an intensified tDCS group (2 × 20 min of tDCS per day). Each tDCS session lasted 2 weeks and the patients underwent repeated sessions at intervals of 2 to 6 months. The cathode was placed over the epileptogenic focus with the current intensity set as 2 mA. Seizure frequency reduction from baseline was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for two related samples. A generalized estimating equation model was used to estimate group, time, and interaction effects. RESULTS: Among the 19 patients who participated in the extended phase, 11 were in the active tDCS group and underwent 2-16 active tDCS sessions, and eight were in the intensified tDCS group and underwent 3-11 intensified tDCS sessions. Seizure reduction was significant from the first to the seventh follow-up, with a median seizure frequency reduction of 41.7%-83.3% (p < 0.05). Compared to the regular tDCS protocol, each intensified tDCS session substantially decreased seizure frequency by 0.3680 (p < 0.05). One patient experienced an increase of 8.5%-232.8% in the total number of seizures during three treatment sessions and follow-ups. CONCLUSION: Repeated long cathodal tDCS sessions yielded significant and progressive long-term seizure reductions in patients with refractory focal epilepsy.

Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for focal epilepsy: A systematic review of preclinical models and clinical studies.

Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is characterized by recurrent seizures despite appropriate treatment with antiseizure medication (ASM). Due to their regenerative and immunomodulatory potential, therapies with biologics such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) offer a potential therapeutic benefit for structural causes of epilepsy, such as hippocampal sclerosis. In this article, we report a systematic review of the literature evaluating the preclinical and clinical studies of MSCs for DRE. Medline, Ovid EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Databases were searched electronically from their dates of inception to November 2021 using the following keywords: (("mesenchymal") AND ("stem cell")) AND (("epilepsy") OR ("convulsion") OR ("seizures")). This review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The initial query identified 488 studies representing 323 unique manuscripts. After application of selection criteria, 15 studies were included in this systematic review; 11 were preclinical studies and 4 were clinical studies. All preclinical studies were performed in rodents and all clinical studies were phase 1 trials. Thus far, therapy with MSCs appears to be safe for use in humans, as no severe adverse events related directly to the therapy were reported. Furthermore, MSC therapy appears to provide a statistically significant clinical benefit by reducing the seizure burden of patients, reducing the electrophysiological biomarkers of epilepsy, and improving their comorbidities, such as depression and anxiety. In addition, animal studies reveal that the therapy exerts its effect by reducing aberrant mossy fiber sprouting (reduce excitatory pathways) and increasing γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic interneurons (increase inhibitory pathways). Both preclinical and clinical studies have shown MSC therapy to be safe and preliminary effective, thus warranting further studies to investigate its therapeutic potential.

Concurrent brain-responsive and vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical trials of a brain-responsive neurostimulator, RNS® System (RNS), excluded patients with a vagus nerve stimulator, VNS® System (VNS). The goal of this study was to evaluate seizure outcomes and safety of concurrent RNS and VNS stimulation in adults with drug-resistant focal-onset seizures. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter chart review was performed on all patients with an active VNS and RNS who were treated for a minimum of 6 months with both systems concurrently. Frequency of disabling seizures at baseline before RNS, at 1 year after RNS placement, and at last follow-up were used to calculate the change in seizure frequency after treatment. Data on adverse events and complications related to each device were collected. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients from 10 epilepsy centers met inclusion criteria. All but one patient received RNS after VNS. The median follow-up time after RNS implantation was 28 months. Analysis of the entire population of patients with active VNS and RNS systems revealed a median reduction in seizure frequency at 1 year post-RNS placement of 43% with a responder rate of 49%, and at last follow-up a 64% median reduction with a 67% responder rate. No negative interactions were reported from the concurrent use of VNS and RNS. Stimulation-related side-effects were reported more frequently in association with VNS (30%) than with RNS (2%). SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that concurrent treatment with VNS and RNS is safe and that the addition of RNS to VNS can further reduce seizure frequency.