WITHDRAWN: Extraction of primary (baby) teeth for unerupted palatally displaced permanent canine teeth in children.

BACKGROUND: The permanent canine tooth in the maxillary (upper) jaw sometimes does not erupt into the mouth correctly. In about 1% to 3% of the population these teeth will be diverted into the roof of the mouth (palatally). It has been suggested that if the primary canine is removed at the right time this palatal eruption might be avoided. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2009. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of extracting the primary maxillary canine on the eruption of the palatally ectopic maxillary permanent canine. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (to 20 April 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 1), MEDLINE via OVID (1946 to 20 April 2012) and EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 20 April 2012). There were no restrictions regarding language or date of publication. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials were selected if they met the following criteria: a randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trial, involving the extraction of the deciduous maxillary canine and assessing eruption/non-eruption of the palatally displaced maxillary permanent canine. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extraction was undertaken independently by two review authors. The primary outcome was the reported prevalence of eruption or non-eruption of the ectopic permanent canine into the mouth following observation or intervention. Results were to be expressed as risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals and mean differences for continuous outcomes. Heterogeneity was to be investigated, including both clinical and methodological factors. Authors of trials were contacted to request unpublished data. MAIN RESULTS: Reports of two randomised controlled trials previously excluded from an earlier version of the review due to "deficiencies in reporting, insufficient data" have now been included. These two trials included approximately 128 children, with more than 150 palatally displaced canine teeth, and both were conducted by the same research group. Data presented in the trial reports are either incomplete or inconsistent. Both trials are at high risk of bias. It must be emphasised that both trials have serious deficiencies in the way they were designed, conducted, and reported, and attempts to contact the authors to obtain detailed information and clarify inconsistencies have been unsuccessful. Allocation to treatment appears to be at the level of the individual, but outcomes of successful treatment relate to included teeth and data are not reported for each treatment group. Adverse effects are not reported. Neither trial provides any evidence to guide clinical decision making. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no evidence of the effects of extraction of primary canine teeth in 10-13 year old children with one or two palatally displaced permanent canine teeth.

Quiste bucal mandibular infectado bilateral en segundos molares permanentes: reporte de un caso / Bilateral mandibular infected buccal cyst in second permanent molars: a case report

El quiste bucal mandibular infectado corresponde a una lesión poco frecuente, de etiología desconocida, que se presenta en niños de 6 a 13 años, generalmente de forma unilateral, durante el proceso de erupción de los primeros molares permanentes. Con menor frecuencia puede afectar a segundos molares permanentes. El diente asociado a la lesión se encuentra vital, presentando un patrón alterado de erupción. Puede presentarse sintomatología, sensibilidad, incremento en la profundidad del saco periodontal, aumento de volumen en fondo de vestíbulo y supuración. Además, puede observarse un retraso en la erupción del molar involucrado, con inclinación de su corona hacia vestibular. Al examen imagenológico se observa una lesión radiolúcida sobre la corona del molar comprometido, rodeada por un halo radiopaco de concavidad superior sobreproyectado parcialmente sobre sus raíces. Este quiste no presenta características histológicas específicas, por lo que el diagnóstico de esta lesión debe realizarse en base a las características clínicas, imagenológicas e histopatológicas. Se presenta un particular caso clínico de quiste bucal mandibular infectado bilateral en segundos molares permanentes

The mandibular infected buccal cyst is an infrequent lesion, of unknown etiology, presented usually in 6-13-year-old children. Generally, this cyst occurs unilaterally, in association with tooth eruption of first lower permanent molars. With a lower frequency, it can affect second lower permanent molars. The associated tooth is found to be vital, with an altered eruption pattern. This tooth may show some symptoms, such as sensitivity, clinical appearance of periodontal pocket, swelling of the buccal vestibule and suppuration. Moreover, a delayed eruption of the involved molar can be seen, with its crown buccally tilted. The imaging examination shows a radiolucent lesion over the crown and rootsof the involved tooth, surrounded by a concave up radiopaque inferior margin. This cyst does not have any specific histological features; thus, its diagnosis should be performed based on its clinical, histological and imaging features. An unusual clinical case of a mandibular infected buccal cyst involving both second permanent mandibular molars is reported

[Recognizing and preventing disturbances in eruption]. / Herkennen en voorkomen van eruptiestoornissen.

Disturbances in eruption and related problems are quite common in permanent dentition but rare in deciduous dentition. For the timely recognition of disturbances in eruption, knowledge of the normal development of dentition is essential. Disturbances in eruption comprise disturbances in which eruption does not occur at all, in which it is delayed or incomplete, or in which the normal direction of eruption is influenced. If identified early enough, many undesirable dental conditions can be avoided or their seriousness can be limited. A possible impacting of permanent cuspids, for example, can be avoided by extracting the deciduous cuspids at the right moment; in cases of a large overjet or the threat of a cover-bite, lip interference can be prevented.

Preventive orthodontic management of tooth transposition.

The contemporary orthodontics should highlight the periodical control of growth and dental development in order to intercept possible disorders in facial growth and tooth eruption. This may allow avoidance or simplification of corrective orthodontic treatment, making it faster and less aggressive. Tooth transposition, a genetically determined eruptive disturbance, presents a relatively low prevalence in the world population and primarily affects maxillary canines and premolars. This paper presents an option for interceptive treatment of bilateral transposition of maxillary canine and premolar diagnosed early in a young individual. Longitudinal follow-up of RME performed in adequate timing to redirect the eruption pathway of permanent maxillary canines is presented.

Effect of interceptive extraction of deciduous canine on palatally displaced maxillary canine: a prospective randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the extraction of deciduous canines on palatally displaced canines (PDCs), to analyze the impact of the age of the patient on this interceptive treatment, and to assess the outcome of one-sided extraction of a maxillary primary canine on the midline of the maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 48 PDCs in 24 consecutive patients with bilateral PDCs. The mean age of the patients at diagnosis was 11.6 years (standard deviation 1.2 years). After randomization, one deciduous canine of each patient was assigned to extraction, and the contralateral side served as control. The patients were then followed at 6-month intervals for 18 months with panoramic and intraoral occlusal radiographs. RESULTS: The rates of successful eruption of the PDCs at extraction and control sites were 67% and 42%, respectively, at 18 months. The difference between the sites was statistically significant, and the effect was significantly more pronounced in the younger participants. A significant decrease in arch perimeter occurred at extraction sites compared to control sites during the observation period. No midline shift toward the extraction side was observed in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: The extraction of the deciduous canine is an effective measure in PDC cases, but it must be done in younger patients in combination with early diagnosis, at the age of 10-11 years. Maintenance of the perimeter of the upper arch is an important step during the observation period, and a palatal arch as a space-holding device is recommended.

Management of premature primary tooth loss in the child patient.

Premature loss of primary teeth can result in a loss of arch length and have a negative effect on occlusion and alignment, often increasing the need for orthodontic treatment. Use of space maintainers can reduce the severity of problems such as crowding, ectopic eruption, tooth impaction and poor molar relationship. This article presents a review of the consequences of premature tooth loss and discusses the appliances commonly used for space maintenance.

Extraction of primary (baby) teeth for unerupted palatally displaced permanent canine teeth in children.

BACKGROUND: The permanent canine tooth in the maxillary (upper) jaw sometimes does not erupt into the mouth correctly. In about 1% to 3% of the population these teeth will be diverted into the roof of the mouth (palatally). It has been suggested that if the primary canine is removed at the right time this palatal eruption might be avoided. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2009. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of extracting the primary maxillary canine on the eruption of the palatally ectopic maxillary permanent canine. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (to 20 April 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 1), MEDLINE via OVID (1946 to 20 April 2012) and EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 20 April 2012). There were no restrictions regarding language or date of publication. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials were selected if they met the following criteria: a randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trial, involving the extraction of the deciduous maxillary canine and assessing eruption/non-eruption of the palatally displaced maxillary permanent canine. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extraction was undertaken independently by two review authors. The primary outcome was the reported prevalence of eruption or non-eruption of the ectopic permanent canine into the mouth following observation or intervention. Results were to be expressed as risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals and mean differences for continuous outcomes. Heterogeneity was to be investigated, including both clinical and methodological factors. Authors of trials were contacted to request unpublished data. MAIN RESULTS: Reports of two randomised controlled trials previously excluded from an earlier version of the review due to "deficiencies in reporting, insufficient data" have now been included. These two trials included approximately 128 children, with more than 150 palatally displaced canine teeth, and both were conducted by the same research group. Data presented in the trial reports are either incomplete or inconsistent. Both trials are at high risk of bias. It must be emphasised that both trials have serious deficiencies in the way they were designed, conducted, and reported, and attempts to contact the authors to obtain detailed information and clarify inconsistencies have been unsuccessful. Allocation to treatment appears to be at the level of the individual, but outcomes of successful treatment relate to included teeth and data are not reported for each treatment group. Adverse effects are not reported. Neither trial provides any evidence to guide clinical decision making. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no evidence of the effects of extraction of primary canine teeth in 10-13 year old children with one or two palatally displaced permanent canine teeth.

National clinical guidelines for management of the palatally ectopic maxillary canine.

This review summarises updated clinical guidelines produced by the Clinical Standards Committee of the Faculty of Dental Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons of England (FDSRCS). This guideline on the management of the palatally ectopic maxillary canine illustrates the information contained in the recently updated online version. The timely recognition of ectopic canines is important for the overall management of the dentition. This review illustrates five management strategies for ectopic permanent canines: interceptive treatment by extraction of the deciduous canine, surgical exposure and orthodontic alignment, surgical removal of the palatally ectopic permanent canine, auto-transplantation and no active treatment/leave and observe. The current available evidence for each of these management options has been evaluated and awarded a grade used by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network.

Comparison of Australian and American orthodontic clinical approaches towards root resorption.

AIMS: As part of The Rocky Mountain Travelling Fellowship, a pilot survey was conducted to assess current diagnostic and clinical approaches to the management of orthodontic patients in relation to root resorption. METHODS: Groups comprising Australians (Sydney, New South Wales) and North Americans (Los Angeles, California), in two stages of their orthodontic careers (post-graduate orthodontic students from the University of Sydney and University of Southern California and qualified practising orthodontists) were asked to complete a questionnaire. The questions examined diagnosis and management approaches related to root resorption used in their clinical practice. RESULTS: Replies demonstrated that there were differences in management depending on operator experience and the country of clinical practice. However, a summarised common approach to orthodontic root resorption comprised (1) the use of an orthopantomogram as a screening diagnostic tool, followed by periapical radiographs for those perceived as 'higher risk' patients, particularly individuals with a history of root resorption; (2) a six monthly radiographic review during treatment; (3) the use of light forces and/or rest periods (discontinuous forces) every two to three months; (4) the extraction of deciduous teeth if permanent successors were erupting ectopically and causing damage to adjacent root structures; and (5) the use of fixed retention after treatment. CONCLUSION: This project was intended to initiate discussion and form a basis for further investigation into the clinical management of orthodontic root resorption.

Preventive treatment of ectopically erupting maxillary permanent canines by extraction of deciduous canines and first molars: A randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: In this research project, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of single (1 deciduous canine) and double (deciduous canine and first molar) extractions in subjects with retained maxillary permanent canines positioned palatally or centrally in the alveolar crest, at risk for root resorption of adjacent permanent teeth. METHODS: Subjects at risk for canine impaction or resorptive situations were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment modalities: single extraction (17 patients, 28 canines) or double extraction (20 patients, 37 canines). Thirty-one patients with 53 canines judged to be not at risk constituted the untreated control group. Panoramic radiographs were taken at the initial observation and after 18 months on average. Between-group statistical comparisons were carried out on the changes in canine inclination and sector location (measured on panoramic radiographs) and on the percentages of successful permanent canine eruptions. RESULTS: The double-extraction group showed significant improvements in the success rate and the intrabony position of the permanent canine, in terms of uprighting the canine's long axis with a crown movement in a distal direction. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant deciduous canine and first molar extractions proved to be more effective as a preventive approach to promote eruption of retained maxillary permanent canines positioned palatally or centrally.

Early identification and management of mandibular canine ectopia.

Mandibular canine impaction and transmigration have serious consequences for the patient, as removal of the tooth or teeth in question is often the only solution. The loss of one or both mandibular canines complicates orthodontic treatment. Early warning signs of mandibular canine ectopia are explored in this paper as well as how to assess the potential for displacement, impaction and/or transmigration. This paper highlights the value of interceptive treatment once the early signs of an aberrant mandibular canine have been detected.

Double vs single primary teeth extraction approach as prevention of permanent maxillary canines ectopic eruption.

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of extraction of primary maxillary canines and first molars (double extraction approach) vs primary maxillary canines extraction (single extraction approach) in cases of ectopic permanent maxillary canines (PMCs). METHODS: Palatally or centrally displaced PMCs were randomly assigned as follows: single extraction (Group 1=29 patients, 52 canines); double extraction (Group 2=30 patients, 56 canines). PMCs inclination to the midline and to the long axis of the lateral incisor, mesiodistal position of the PMCs crown, and first premolars angulation to the midline were measured on panoramic radiographs at T0 and after 18 months (T1), on average. Between-group statistical comparison was carried out on T0-T1 changes for all the radiographic variables. Eruption/noneruption of the PMCs was also assessed. RESULTS: Group 2 exhibited improvements in PMCs intrabony position among all the examined variables (P<.001), obtaining a greater parallelism between the roots of the PMCs and the adjacent lateral incisors (P<.001). An improved position of the first premolars due to a reduced angulation (P<.001) was also observed. Clinical success rates showed no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: The double extraction approach proved to be a more effective procedure vs the single extraction approach in improving permanent maxillary canines' intraosseous position.

Interceptive treatment of palatal impaction of maxillary canines with rapid maxillary expansion: a randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Our aim in this prospective randomized clinical study was to assess the prevalence rate of eruption of palatally displaced canines, diagnosed at an early developmental stage with posteroanterior radiographs and consequently treated by rapid maxillary expansion. METHODS: A sample of 60 subjects in the early mixed dentition with palatally displaced canines diagnosed on posteroanterior radiographs was enrolled in the trial. Their age range at the first observation (T1) was 7.6 to 9.6 years, with a prepubertal stage of skeletal maturity (CS1 or CS2). The 60 subjects were randomly allocated to the treatment group (TG, 35 subjects) or the no-treatment group (NTG, 25 subjects). The TG was treated with a banded rapid maxillary expander; after expansion, all patients were retained with the expander in place for 6 months. Thereafter, the expander was removed, and the patients wore a retention plate at night for a year. The NTG received no treatment. All subjects were reevaluated in the early permanent dentition (T2) (postpubertal CS4). The number of dropouts was recorded. The main outcome recorded at T2 was successful or unsuccessful eruption of the maxillary permanent canines. The starting forms at T1 for measurements on posteroanterior and panoramic films were compared in the 2 groups with the Mann-Whitney U test (P <0.05). The prevalence rates of successful and unsuccessful treatments in the TG were compared with those in NTG with chi-square tests (P <0.05). From T1 to T2, there were 3 dropouts in each group. RESULTS: The final sample comprised 32 subjects in the TG and 22 subjects in the NTG. No statistically significant differences were found for any variable at T1. The prevalence rates of successful eruption of the maxillary canines were 65.7% (21 subjects) in the TG and 13.6% (3 subjects) in the NTG. The comparison was statistically significant (chi-square = 12.4; P <0.001). Subjects with palatally displaced canines in the early mixed dentition do not have transverse deficiency of the maxillary arch. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a rapid maxillary expander as an early interceptive approach is effective for increasing the rate of eruption of palatally displaced canines.

Extraction of primary (baby) teeth for unerupted palatally displaced permanent canine teeth in children.

BACKGROUND: The permanent canine tooth in the upper (maxillary) jaw sometimes does not erupt into the mouth correctly. In about 1% to 3% of the population these teeth will be diverted into the roof of the mouth (palatally). It has been suggested that if the deciduous canine is removed at the right time this palatal eruption might be avoided. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of extracting the primary maxillary canine on the eruption of the palatally ectopic maxillary permanent canine. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (to April 2008); CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 3); MEDLINE (1966 to April 2008); EMBASE (1980 to April 2008). There were no language restrictions. Authors of trials were contacted for further data. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials were selected if they met the following criteria: a randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trial, involving the extraction of the primary maxillary canine and assessing eruption/non-eruption of the palatally displaced maxillary permanent canine. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Seven review authors independently, in duplicate, examined the studies found in the search. The primary outcome was the reported prevalence of eruption or non-eruption of the ectopic permanent canine into the mouth following observation or intervention. Results were to be expressed as risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals and mean differences for continuous outcomes. Heterogeneity was to be investigated, including both clinical and methodological factors. MAIN RESULTS: The search identified 324 publications of which 295 were excluded after reviewing the abstract. Full articles were obtained for the remaining 31, of which 19 were non-English and required translation. Three reports of two randomised controlled trials were identified for possible inclusion in the review; however, the data in the publications were not presented in a form that could be usable and the authors have been contacted for further details. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no evidence to support the extraction of the deciduous maxillary canine to facilitate the eruption of the palatally ectopic maxillary permanent canine. Two randomised controlled trials were identified but unfortunately, due to deficiencies in reporting, they cannot be included in the review at the present time.

Wisdom tooth eruption secondary to localized lower molar mesialization in patients with aplastic lower second premolars.

OBJECTIVE: After localized space closure in the mandible it is desirable to preserve lower wisdom teeth as natural replacements for missing second premolars and as antagonists for upper second molars. The aim of this study was to determine whether this treatment method can obviate the need for prosthodontic restorations, implants, and third molar osteotomy. Furthermore the time point of possible third molar eruption was to be determined and whether further orthodontic interventions were required to achieve their alignment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The test group comprised 34 patients who exhibited agenesis of one or both lower second premolars (n = 45) in conjunction with a corresponding number of third molar tooth germs. Follow-up examinations were performed 2 to 8 years after conclusion of orthodontic treatment involving push-and-pull mechanics (PPM) without extraction of any contralateral teeth. The results of the clinical retrospective follow-up examination at consecutive post-treatment endpoints were compared with two orthodontic control groups (A: 4-premolar extraction group, B: non-extraction group). RESULTS: After an average of 4 years and 2 months, the percentage of fully-erupted third molars in the agenesis group with localized space closure was 82%, compared to 29% and 28%, respectively, in the controls. These differences were statistically significant (p < or = 0.01). The success rate in the agenesis group reached 94% when the 4- to 8-year results were considered in isolation. Compared with the contralateral (non-aplastic) side, teeth on the aplastic side erupted prematurely. In 9% of the cases, minor orthodontic interventions were required to exactly position the third molars. CONCLUSION: There is high probability that mandibular third molars can be preserved after localized space closure, obviating the need for prosthodontic restorations, dental implants, and third molar osteotomies.

Role of interceptive orthodontics in early mixed dentition.

Early orthodontic interventions are often initiated in the developing dentition to promote favourable developmental changes and remove or suppress those that are unfavourable. Early interceptive orthodontics can eliminate or reduce the severity of a developing malocclusion, the complexity of orthodontic treatment, overall treatment time and cost. It also improves self-esteem in the subjects and parental satisfaction. Early detection and appropriate referral of cases requiring interceptive orthodontics are important. However, lack of awareness among school children, parents and primary-care personnel (dental nurses and dental officers) may result in patients not being referred for timely interceptive intervention. This article presents a general view of the scope of interceptive orthodontics that can be carried out in early mixed dentition, i.e. when the permanent incisors and molars are erupting into the oral cavity.

To what extent do deviations from an ideal occlusion constitute a health risk?

Selection of patients for orthodontic treatment should be based on a thorough analysis of the consequences of malocclusions for the individual. The mere presence of deviations from the concept of the ideal occlusion should have no influence on orthodontic treatment decisions. According to available studies, the influence of malocclusion on periodontal health, speech and chewing is fairly minor. Neither can orthodontic treatment be justified as an effective means of preventing TMD but it may be indicated to reduce existing signs and symptoms of TMD in certain carefully selected cases. Interceptive or preventive orthodontic treatment may be indicated to reduce the negative influence on growth and occlusal development of functional malocclusions (anterior or lateral forced bite) or ectopic tooth eruption. Similarly, early correction of large overjet may be valuable in order to reduce the risk of traumatic injuries. Such treatment is usually motivated during the primary or mixed dentition periods. From the teenage period and onwards, psychosocial or aesthetic reasons for orthodontic treatment are dominating. Decisions to start orthodontic treatment in order to improve aesthetics should usually not be taken before the child has reached sufficient maturity for these decisions, normally after the age of 12 years. Special consideration needs to be given to subjects with craniofacial syndromes or handicap in order to develop effective treatment methods to promote as normal growth and occlusal development as possible.

Early detection and prevention of mandibular tooth transposition.

Distal migration of the mandibular permanent lateral incisor happens rarely and it can be discovered radiographically in the early mixed dentition. If unattended, the tooth may erupt ectopically, usually distal to its normal anatomical position and occlusal to the developing first premolar, and it can become transposed with the permanent canine. Early detection and immediate interceptive removal of the retained deciduous lateral incisor and canine, followed by uprighting the ectopic lateral incisor to its normal anatomical position in the arch, will intercept the problem and prevent the developing transposition.