Risk of Cervical Dizziness in Patients With Cervical Spondylosis.

Importance: The dizziness associated with cervical spondylosis is a controversial topic given that many experts believe that cervical spondylosis is a common cause of dizziness, whereas others do not believe it exists. Objective: To compare the risk of dizziness between patients with cervical spondylosis and matched controls (ie, patients with lumbar spondylosis after propensity score matching [PSM]). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used medical claims data from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan for patients 60 years or older with cervical or lumbar spondylosis newly diagnosed in any outpatient department between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2015. Patients diagnosed with cervical spondylosis were included as the study cohort, and those diagnosed with lumbar spondylosis who were matched to the study cohort via PSM were selected as the control cohort. Both cohorts were followed up for 1 year unless they were diagnosed with dizziness, censored by death, or withdrew from the health insurance program. Data analysis was performed from August 9 to September 20, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the date of outpatient diagnosis of dizziness. The risks of dizziness were compared between groups. The relative risk and incidence rate difference were calculated. Results: A total of 3638 patients with cervical spondylosis (mean [SD] age, 67.9 [7.1] years; 2024 [55.6%] male) and 3638 patients with lumbar spondylosis (mean [SD] age, 68.0 [7.1] years; 2024 [55.6%] male) after PSM were selected as the study and control cohorts, respectively. The patients with cervical spondylosis had higher risk of dizziness than matched controls, with a 1-year relative risk of 1.20 (95% CI, 1.03-1.39). The 1-year incidence of dizziness was 10.2% (95% CI, 9.2%-11.2%) in patients with cervical spondylosis and 8.6% (95% CI, 7.7%-9.5%) in the matched group of lumbar spondylosis. The incidence rate difference between the groups was 1.6% (95% CI, 0.3%-3.0%). Conclusions and Relevance: These data support the association between dizziness and cervical spondylosis, but the small difference between groups reveals that dizziness associated with cervical spondylosis is uncommon. Clinicians should be wary of diagnosing a cervical cause for dizziness based on an actual history of cervical spondylosis.

Incidence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration and Its Associated Risk Factors Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and its associated risk factors in adults after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. METHODS: An exhaustive search across multiple databases was conducted, including Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science, to identify pertinent studies. We collected such patient data as demographic variables (including age, gender, body mass index), cervical spondylosis type (such as radiculopathy and myelopathy), diabetes status, smoking and drinking history, and radiological risk factors (such as preoperative ASD status, developmental spinal stenosis, T1 slope, and postoperative less cervical lordosis). Incidence estimates were calculated based on relevant data. Risk factors were assessed using odds ratios and weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Our analysis incorporated a total of 21 studies for incidence analysis. The overall incidence of CASD following ACDF was found to be 11% and radiographical ASD was 30%. Old age (weighted mean difference = 3.21; 95% CI: 0.06, 6.36; P = 0.05), preoperative ASD status (odds ratio = 2.65; 95% CI: 1.53, 4.60; P < 0.01), developmental spinal stenosis (odds ratio = 2.46; 95% CI: 1.61, 3.77; P < 0.01), and postoperative reduction in cervical lordosis were identified as significant risk factors for the occurrence of CASD. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of CASD following ACDF was 11%. Risk factors for CASD included old age, preoperative adjacent segment degeneration, developmental spinal stenosis, and postoperative reduction in cervical lordosis. These findings provide valuable insights for the assessment of adjacent segment disease risk after ACDF, aiding surgeons in diagnosis and treatment decisions.

Epidural Steroid Injections and the Risk of Osteoporosis in Lumbar Spondylosis Patients: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) involve the administration of steroids and local anesthetics into the spinal epidural space, and they are performed by inserting a needle between the ligamentum flavum and dura. This procedure is suitable for patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy secondary to disc herniation or postsurgical radicular pain. The relief period of the analgesic medications may be prolonged by > 6 weeks, resulting in nonsurgical management becoming a suitable option. However, the negative effect of ESIs on bone mineral density has been reported. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to clarify the association between ESIs and osteoporosis risk by analyzing a nationwide population database. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a nationwide retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Data on 1 million cases randomly selected from the 2000 Registry for Beneficiaries of the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) were collected. METHODS: In total, 4,957 patients who were diagnosed with lumbar spondylosis and received ESIs between 2000 and 2013 were identified from the NHIRD. Subsequently, another 4,957 patients with lumbar spondylosis were randomly selected from the same database and frequency matched by age, gender, and index year with the patients who received ESIs. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients were 50.3 ± 17.1 years. The incident rates of osteoporosis in the ESI and non-ESI groups were 7.95 and 7.01 per 1,000 person-years, respectively. Osteoporosis risk was significantly higher in the ESI cohort than in the non-ESI cohort (absolute standardized hazard ratio = 1.23, 95% confidence interval = 1.05-1.45, P = 0.01). The risk factors for osteoporosis were old age, being female, and undergoing ESIs. Osteoporosis risk was significantly higher in the ESI cohort than in the non-ESI cohort in the male, lowest-urbanization-level (fourth level), other-occupations, and comorbidity-free subgroups. LIMITATIONS: The NHIRD did not provide information on osteoporosis-related scales, renal function, blood pressure, smoking habit, pulmonary function, daily activities, and dosage of injected steroids. CONCLUSIONS: For patients diagnosed with lumbar spondylosis, ESIs are associated with a high osteoporosis risk. Thus, this therapy should be recommended with caution, especially for patients with correlated risk factors (e.g., high risk of osteoporotic fracture, low socioeconomic status, and retired or unemployed status).

Evaluation of Genetic and Nongenetic Risk Factors for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the associations of genetic and nongenetic factors with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is mounting evidence for an inherited predisposition for DCM, but uncertainty remains regarding specific genetic markers involved. Similarly, nongenetic factors are thought to play a role. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using diagnosis codes from hospital records linked to the UK Biobank cohort, patients with cervical spondylosis were identified followed by the identification of a subset with DCM. Nongenetic variables evaluated included age, sex, race, Townsend deprivation index, body mass index, occupational demands, osteoporosis, and smoking. Genome-wide association analyses were conducted using logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, population principal components, and follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 851 DCM cases out of 2787 cervical spondylosis patients were identified. Several nongenetic factors were independently associated with DCM including age [odds ratio (OR)=1.11, 95% CI=1.01-1.21, P =0.024], male sex (OR=1.63, 95% CI=1.37-1.93, P <0.001), and relative socioeconomic deprivation (OR=1.03, 95% CI=1.00-1.06, P =0.030). Asian race was associated with lower DCM risk (OR=0.44, 95% CI=0.22-0.85, P =0.014). We did not identify genome-wide significant (≤5×10 -8 ) single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with DCM. The strongest genome-wide signals were at SNP rs67256809 in the intergenic region of the genes LINC02582 and FBXO15 on chromosome 18 ( P =1.12×10 -7 ) and rs577081672 in the GTPBP1 gene on chromosome 22 ( P =2.9×10 -7 ). No SNPs reported in prior DCM studies were significant after adjusting for replication attempts. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing age, male sex, and relative socioeconomic deprivation were identified as independent risk factors for DCM, whereas Asian race was inversely associated. SNPs of potential interest were identified in GTPBP1 and an intergenic region on chromosome 18, but these associations did not reach genome-wide significance. Identification of genetic and nongenetic DCM susceptibility markers may guide understanding of DCM disease processes, inform risk, guide prevention and potentially inform surgical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic level III.

Cardiovascular risk factors mediating the protective effect of education on cervical spondylosis risk.

The causal association between education and cervical spondylosis may be mediated partly through risk factors of cardiovascular disease. The identification of the protective effect of education and the evaluation of risk factors will help to optimize disease prevention at both clinical and public health levels. In this study, we applied several different Mendelian randomization (MR) methods to identify which cardiovascular factors underlie the clustering of cervical spondylosis with cardiovascular disease, and the degree to which these mediate an effect of education. Univariable MR analyses provided evidence supporting a protective effect of genetically predicted education on cervical spondylosis risk, and MVMR further identified the direct effect of education level. Our results also provided evidence supporting the detrimental effects of BMI and smoking on cervical spondylosis risk, with evidence that the effect of education is mediated through BMI and smoking. The proportions of the effect of education mediated through BMI and smoking were 12% and 3%, respectively. These findings highlight education, obesity, and smoking as common mechanisms underlying the clustering of cervical spondylosis with risk factors of cardiovascular disease, which might represent clinical and public health targets for reducing multi-morbidity and the burden of these common conditions.

The prevalence of locomotive syndrome and its associated factors in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the prevalence of locomotive syndrome (LS) and related musculoskeletal diseases [osteoarthritis (OA), lumbar spondylosis, and spinal alignment] in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. METHODS: Clinical data were collected from 101 patients (55 males; 46 females) admitted to our hospital for diabetes education from October 2018 to April 2021. Patients underwent full-spine and whole-legs standing radiography and physical measurements (10-m walking and grip strength tests and three LS risk tests). RESULTS: The estimated prevalence of LS was 86.1% (Stage 1: 44.5%, Stage 2: 41.6%), lumbar spondylosis was 11.9%, and hip, knee, and ankle OA were 16.9%, 51.5%, and 12.9%, respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified grip strength [odds ratio (OR) = 0.89, confidence interval (CI) = 0.83-0.94], diabetic retinopathy (OR = 5.85, CI = 1.64-20.78), knee OA (OR = 3.34, CI = 1.11-10.02), and a sagittal vertical axis >40 mm (OR = 3.42, CI = 1.13-10.39) as significantly associated risk factors for worsening LS in Type 2 DM patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study clarified the epidemiological indicators of LS and associated factors in DM patients. Exercise therapy and DM management are effective strategies to reduce the occurrence and progression of LS.

Risk factors for surgically treated cervical spondylosis in male construction workers: a 20-year prospective study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Degenerative changes due to cervical spondylosis (CS) can detrimentally affect work ability and quality of life yet understanding of how physical exposure affects disease progression is limited. PURPOSE: To assess the associations between occupational physical exposures and occurrence of surgically treated cervical spondylosis (ST-CS) and early exit from the labor market via disability pension. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective register study with 20 years follow-up period. PATIENT SAMPLE: Swedish construction workers participating in a national health surveillance project conducted between 1971 and 1993. OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgically treated cervical spondylosis (ST-CS) and early labor market exit at a minimum rate of 25% time on disability pension. METHODS: Associations between occupational physical exposures (job exposure matrix) and subsequent ST-CS (National Hospital in-patient register) and early labor market exit via disability pension (Swedish Social Insurance Agency register) were assessed in a cohort of male construction workers (n=237,699). RESULTS: A total of 1381 ST-CS cases were present and a 20 years incidence rate of 35.1 cases per 100,000 person years (95% confidence interval (CI) 33.2-36.9). Increased relative risk (RR) for ST-CS was found for workers exposed to non-neutral (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.15-1.69), and awkward neck postures (1.52, 1.19-1.95), working with the hands above shoulder height (1.30, 1.06-1.60), and high upper extremity loading (1.35, 1.15-1.59). Increased risk was also present for workers who reported frequent neck (3.06, 2.18-4.30) and upper back (3.84, 2.57-5.73) pain in the 12 months prior to survey. Among workers with elevated arm exposure, higher risk was seen in those who also had more frequent neck pain. ST-CS cases took early retirement more often (41.3%) and at a younger age (53 years) than the total study cohort (14.8% and 56 years of age, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Occupational exposure to non-neutral neck postures, work with hands above shoulders and high loads born through the upper extremities increased the risk for ST-CS and early retirement due to disability. Decreasing postural and load exposure is salient for primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of CS. Neck pain was shown to be a prognostic factor for ST-CS, which stresses the importance of acting early and taking preventative action to reduce workplace exposure, and the need for systematic medical check-ups within primary or occupational care to mitigate disease progression and early labour market exit due to disability.

[Correlation analysis of cervical spine dysfunction, pain and muscle strength in office workers].

Objective: To expore the correlation between neck disability, neck pain and muscle strength in cervical pondylosis of office worker, and to provide scientific basis for the prevention and treatment of cervical spondylosis. Methods: In April 2021 ,234 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated in the Subsidiary Rehabilitation Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from April 2015 to April 2017 were selected, the correlation between Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, neck pain and muscle strength was analyzed using the Spearman rank correlation method. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the difference of maximum muscle strength of isometric contraction. Results: NDI score was negatively correlated with neck flexion, extension, and muscle strength in the left and right flexion directions (r(s)=-0.164, -0.169, -0.222, -0.176, P=0.012, 0.010, 0.001 , 0.007). In mild and moderate functional disorder patients, the muscle strength in flexion, extension and left and right flexion direction was greater, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.01). Conclusion: There is a negative correlation between cervical functional disorder and cervical muscle strength in office workers, suggesting that strengthening cervical muscle strength may be a way to improve cervical spine function.

Risk factors for the development of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a review of the literature.

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) encompasses various pathological conditions causing spinal cord (SC) impairment, including spondylosis (multiple level degeneration), degenerative disc disease (DDD), ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), and ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF). It is considered the most common cause of SC dysfunction among the adult population. The degenerative phenomena of DDD, spondylosis, OPLL and OLF, is likely due to both inter-related and distinct factors. Age, cervical alignment, and range of motion, as well as congenital factors such as cervical cord-canal mismatch due to congenital stenosis, Klippel-Feil, Ehler-Danlos, and Down syndromes have been previously reported as potential factors of risk for DCM. The correlation between some comorbidities, such as rheumatoid arthritis and movement disorders (Parkinson disease and cervical dystonia) and DCM, has also been reported; however, the literature remains scare. Other patient-specific factors including smoking, participation in contact sports, regular heavy load carrying on the head, and occupation (e.g. astronauts) have also been suggested as potential risk of myelopathy development. Most of the identified DCM risk factors remain poorly studied however. Further researches will be necessary to strengthen the current knowledge on the subject, especially concerning physical labors in order to identify patients at risk and to develop an effective treatment strategy for preventing this increasing prevalent disorder.

Higher incidence of cervical spinal cord compression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a single-institute cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Although the relationship between amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is important, data relating to CSM complications in ALS remain lacking. PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate and validate the spinal cord conditions of ALS patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited all patients diagnosed with ALS, Parkinson's disease (PD), or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) who were admitted to our department from April 1, 2017, to March 31, 2020. We analyzed the cervical or thoracolumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of these 128 patients. Data relating to spondylosis, cord compression, spinal canal diameter, spinal cord diameter, and the closest distance between the cervical spinal canal and cord were validated using MRI. RESULTS: Of the 128 patients, 52 had ALS, 48 had PD, and 28 had CIDP. The proportions of both cervical spondylosis and cervical cord compression were highest in the ALS group compared with the other patient groups (p < 0.05). The proportion of cervical spondylosis in ALS patients reached 38.3%, and that of cervical cord compression reached 53.2%. The closest distance between the cervical spinal canal and cord was also significantly smaller in ALS patients compared with CIDP patients (p < 0.05). In contrast to the cervical cord findings, there were no significant differences in the thoracolumbar cord between ALS patients and the other patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Of the three disease groups, the proportion of CSM was highest in ALS patients. Furthermore, cervical cord conditions were significantly more crowded in the ALS patients than in the other patient groups.

Cervical alignment in the obese population following posterior cervical fusion for cervical myelopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on the reoperation rate and cervical sagittal alignment of patients who underwent posterior cervical decompression and fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical sagittal balance has been correlated with postoperative clinical outcomes. Previous studies have shown worse postoperative sagittal alignment and higher reoperation rates in patients with high BMI undergoing anterior decompression and fusion. Similar evidence for the impact of obesity in postoperative sagittal alignment for patients with (CSM) undergoing posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCF) is lacking. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 198 patients who underwent PCF for cervical myelopathy due to degenerative spine disease was performed. Demographics, need for reoperation, and perioperative radiographic parameters were collected. Cervical lordosis (CL), C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and T1 slope (T1S) was measured on standing lateral radiographs. Comparative analysis of the patient cohort was performed by stratifying the sample population into three BMI categories (<25, 25-30, ≥30). RESULT: Of the 198 patients that met inclusion criteria, 53 had BMI normal (<25), 65 were overweight (25-30), and 80 were obese (≥30). Mean SVA increased postoperatively in all groups, 4 mm in the normal group, 13 mm in the overweight group, and 13 mm in the obese group (p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in the postoperative change of cervical lordosis or T1 slope between the groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated fusions involving the cervicothoracic junction and those involving 5 or more levels significantly affected alignment parameters. There were 27 complications requiring reoperation (14%) with no significant differences among the groups stratified by BMI (p = 0.386). CONCLUSIONS: Overweight patients (BMI>25) with CSM undergoing PCF had a greater increase in SVA than normal weight patients while reoperation rates were similar. In addition, preoperative CL increased with increasing BMI, although this trend was not Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation significant and there was not found to be a significant difference between the change in CL from baseline to post-fusion between BMI cohorts. This study further highlights the importance of considering BMI when attempting to optimize sagittal alignment in patients undergoing PCF.

Cervical and Thoracic Spondylotic Myelopathies.

Spondylotic myelopathies are among the most common disorders of the spine, yet the clinical and treatment approach is far from standardized. This article discusses our current understanding of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical assessment, natural history, and treatment options in degenerative myelopathies of the cervical and thoracic spine. We additionally review diagnostic modalities including imaging modalities of the spine and neurophysiological tools such as electromyography/nerve conduction studies, somatosensory-evoked potentials, and motor-evoked potentials. Assessment instruments that can be used for the assessment of myelopathies are reviewed, including the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, modified-JOA scale, Nurick scale, nine-hole peg test, and 30-m walking test. We also review common disorders that mimic spondylotic myelopathies, as well as helpful diagnostic clues in differentiating spondylotic and nonspondylotic myelopathies.

Prevalence and Predictive Factors of Asymptomatic Spondylotic Cervical Spinal Stenosis in Patients with Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: We performed a retrospective cohort study to investigate the prevalence of and risk factors for asymptomatic spondylotic cervical spinal stenosis (ASCSS) in the setting of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). METHODS: A total of 114 patients with a diagnosis of LSS without cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy were grouped into ASCSS and non-ASCSS groups. The medical data and radiological parameters, including age, sex, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, symptom duration, redundant nerve roots, dural sac cross-sectional area (DCSA), facet joint angle, lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), pelvic incidence (PI), Torg-Pavlov ratio, and lumbosacral transitional vertebrae, were analyzed. The lumbar stenosis index and cervical stenosis index of the 114 patients were also analyzed. RESULTS: ASCSS occurred in 70 of the 114 patients with LSS (61.4%). The two groups showed significant differences in symptom duration, redundant nerve roots, LLA, DCSA, and PI. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, an LLA >35.85° (P < 0.001) and a DCSA <84.50 mm2 (P = 0.003) were independently associated with ASCSS. The multi-index receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the area under the curve for predicted probability was 0.805 (P < 0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed that cervical stenosis index significantly and positively correlated with the lumbar stenosis index (r = 0.430; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that an LLA >35.85° and a DCSA <84.50 mm2 are risk factors for the development of ASCSS. For LSS patients with an enlarged LLA and reduced DSCA, a whole spinal magnetic resonance imaging examination should be performed.

A Comparison of the Surgical Outcomes of Laminoplasty and Laminectomy with Fusion in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

AIM: To compare the effectiveness of laminoplasty and laminectomy with fusion in the treatment of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 52 patients diagnosed with CSM who underwent either laminoplasty (LP group) or laminectomy with fusion (LF group). The preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes were evaluated using Cobb?s angle of cervical lordosis, visual analogue scale (VAS) and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scores, and radiographs showing the antero-posterior diameter and area of the spinal canal. RESULTS: The mean age of the LP group was 60.12 years, while that of the LF group was 63.84 years. The pre- and postoperative mean mJOA scores were 11.46 ± 1.27 and 15.27 ± 0.87, respectively, in the LP group and 10.15 ± 1.89 and 14.92 ± 1.23, respectively, in the LF group. The pre- and postoperative Cobb angles were 16.22 ± 6.36° and 14.45 ± 4.50°, respectively, in the LP group and 14.39 ± 5.34° and 15.10 ± 6.21°, respectively, in the LF group. Recovery rates were 58.26% and 60.76% in the LP and LF groups, respectively. The mJOA scores, antero-posterior diameter and area improved significantly after surgery in both groups, while the Cobb angle increased in the LF group and decreased in the LP group. CONCLUSION: Laminoplasty and laminectomy with fusion improved neurological functions in patients diagnosed with CSM. Laminectomy with fusion should be the preferred choice when treating patients with preoperative axial pain as, despite expanding the spinal canal successfully, laminoplasty can also worsen the pain. However, laminectomy with fusion (except for OPLL) should not be the treatment of choice in a mobile spine as it severely restricts neck movements and impairs the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) of the patient. In the absence of kyphotic deformity, laminoplasty should be the preffered method for treatment.

Update: Osteoarthritis and Spondylosis, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2016-2020.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common adult joint disease and accounts for significant morbidity burdens among U.S. civilian and military populations. During 2016-2020, the crude overall rates of incident OA and spondylosis diagnoses among U.S. active component service members were 630.9 per 100,000 person-years (p-yrs) and 958.2 per 100,000 p-yrs, respectively. Crude annual rates of both conditions decreased markedly from 2016 through 2020 with declines evident in all of the demographic and military subgroups examined. Compared to their respective counterparts, crude overall rates of OA diagnoses were highest among male service members, those aged 35 or older, non-Hispanic Black service members, Army members, and those working in health care occupations. Crude overall rates of spondylosis diagnoses were highest among those aged 30 or older, non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black service members, Army members, and those in health care and communications/intelligence occupations. More than two-thirds of all incident OA diagnoses involved the knee (38.8%) or shoulder (28.4%). Differences in anatomic site-specific rates of OA were apparent by sex, race/ethnicity group, service, and military occupation. Additional research to identify military-specific equipment and activities that increase the risk of acute and chronic damage to joints would be useful to develop, test, and implement practical and effective countermeasures against OA and spondylosis among military members in general and those in high-risk occupations specifically.

A population-based case-control study of the association between cervical spondylosis and tinnitus.

OBJECTIVE: This population-based study aimed to study the association between tinnitus and cervical spondylosis. DESIGN: A case-control study. STUDY SAMPLE: We retrieved data from the Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Database. We identified 2465 patients with tinnitus (cases) and 7395 comparison patients by propensity score matching. Multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to estimate the odds (OR) of a diagnosis of cervical spondylosis preceding the tinnitus diagnosis relative to controls. RESULTS: We found that 1596 (16.19%) of 9860 sample patients had received a diagnosis of cervical spondylosis before the index date, significantly different between the tinnitus group and control group (17.20% vs. 15.85%, p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed an adjusted OR for prior cervical spondylosis of 1.235 for cases vs. controls (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.088-1.402). Further, the adjusted ORs were 1.246 (95% CI: 1.041-1.491) and 1.356 (95% CI: 1.016-1.811), respectively, among patients aged 45 ∼ 64 and >64 groups. No difference in cervical spondylosis likelihood between cases and controls was found among patients aged 18 ∼ 44 groups. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the study shows a positive association between cervical spondylosis and tinnitus. The findings call for greater awareness among physicians about a possible somatosensory component of cervical spine function which may contribute to tinnitus.

Can Dislocation Rates Be Decreased Using the Anterior Approach in Patients With Lumbar Spondylosis or Lumbar Instrumented Fusion?

BACKGROUND: Although spinopelvic stiffness is known to contribute to instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA), it is unknown whether use of an anterior surgical approach is associated with decreased postoperative instability rates in patients with lumbar spondylosis or fusion. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 1750 patients who underwent primary THA at our institution over an 8-year time period. Radiographic and chart review was performed evaluating for dislocations. Lumbar and pelvic radiographs were used to identify the presence of spondylosis and/or instrumented fusion. Patients were then divided into non-spondylosis and spondylosis or fusion groups to compare dislocation rates by surgical approach. RESULTS: In total, 54.4% of THA patients had an anterior approach (n = 952) and 54.6% had lumbar spondylosis or instrumented fusion (n = 956). There were 29 dislocations in total (1.7%), with less occurring in anterior approach patients (0.6% vs 2.9%, P < .001). In the patients without lumbar spondylosis, there were less dislocations in the anterior approach group (0.2% vs 1.7%, P = .048). Likewise, in patients with lumbar spondylosis or fusion, there were less dislocations in the anterior approach group (1.0% vs 3.8%, P = .004). Using logistic regression, there was a 4.1× increased risk of dislocation with a posterior approach vs an anterior approach in the spondylosis or fusion group (P = .011). CONCLUSION: Patients with lumbar spondylosis or fusion have high rates of instability. At our institution, we found that utilization of an anterior surgical approach substantially mitigated this risk.

Genome-wide Association Analysis Across 16,956 Patients Identifies a Novel Genetic Association Between BMP6, NIPAL1, CNGA1 and Spondylosis.

STUDY DESIGN: A case-control genome-wide association study (GWAS) on spondylosis. OBJECTIVE: Leveraging Geisinger's MyCode initiative's multimodal dataset, we aimed to identify genetic associations with degenerative spine disease. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Degenerative spine conditions are a leading cause of global disability; however, the genetic underpinnings of these conditions remain under-investigated. Previous studies using candidate-gene approach suggest a genetic risk for degenerative spine conditions, but large-scale GWASs are lacking. METHODS: We identified 4434 patients with a diagnosis of spondylosis using ICD diagnosis codes with genotype data available. We identified a population-based control of 12,522 patients who did not have any diagnosis for osteoarthritis. A linear-mix, additive genetic model was employed to perform the genetic association tests adjusting for age, sex, and genetic principal components to account for the population structure and relatedness. Gene-based association tests were performed and heritability and genetic correlations with other traits were investigated. RESULTS: We identified a genome-wide significant locus at rs12190551 (odds ratio = 1.034, 95% confidence interval 1.022-1.046, P = 8.5 × 10-9, minor allele frequency = 36.9%) located in the intron of BMP6. Additionally, NIPAL1 and CNGA1 achieved Bonferroni significance in the gene-based association tests. The estimated heritability was 7.19%. Furthermore, significant genetic correlations with pain, depression, lumbar spine bone mineral density, and osteoarthritis were identified. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the use of a massive database of genotypes combined with electronic health record data to identify a novel and significant association spondylosis. We also identified significant genetic correlations with pain, depression, bone mineral density, and osteoarthritis, suggesting shared genetic etiology and molecular pathways with these phenotypes.Level of Evidence: N/A.