Have we progressed in the surgical literature? Thirty-year trends in clinical studies in 3 surgical journals.

BACKGROUND: We practice in an era of evidence-based medicine. In 1993, Solomon and McLeod published an article examining study designs in 3 surgical journals from 1980 and 1990. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate subsequent 30-year trends in the quality of selected literature. DESIGN: All of the articles from Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, Surgery, and the British Journal of Surgery during 2000 and 2010 were classified by study design. Nonclinical studies were substratified by animal/laboratory, surgical technique, editorial/review, or miscellaneous articles. Clinical articles were categorized as case or comparative studies, further categorized by study design, and rated on a 10-point scale to determine strength. We compared interobserver reliability using a random sample. SETTING: This study was conducted at 3 North American medical centers. PATIENTS: Patients described in the scope of the literature were included in this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency, type, and strength of study design were measured. RESULTS: We evaluated 1911 articles (967 clinical; 17% comparative). There was a significant increase in multicenter clinical studies (from 12% to 27%; p < 0.0001) and mean study population (from 326 to 6775; p < 0.05). Studies using administrative data increased from 14% to 43% (p < 0.0001). Case reports decreased from 16% to 7% of all clinical studies (p < 0.001), whereas the percentage of comparative studies increased from 14% to 21% (p = 0.001). The percentage of randomized controlled trials did not increase significantly (8.5% in 2000; 10.0% in 2010; p = 0.44). The mean 10-point score for comparative studies was 6.7 for both years (p = 0.50). There was good interobserver agreement in the classification of studies (κ = 0.70) and moderate agreement in scoring comparative studies (κ = 0.47). LIMITATIONS: This descriptive study cannot fully account for the reasons behind the identified differences. CONCLUSIONS: Comparative and multicenter studies, mean study population, and the use of administrative data increased from 2000 to 2010. This suggests that increased use of administrative databases has allowed larger populations of patients from more institutions to be studied and may be more generalizable. Researchers should strive toward improving the level of evidence (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A167).

Oncological translational research in the Spanish national health system: the INTRO study

OBJECTIVES: Under the auspices of the Foundation for Excellence and Quality in Oncology (ECO), the Translational Research in Oncology Medical Services Study (INTRO) was conducted with the aim of describing the current state of, and future expectations for translational cancer research in Spanish medical centres. The first step in the investigation was intended to analyse the current condition of the national Medical Oncology Services network by examining different aspects of the oncology research field. METHODS: A descriptive and observational multicentre study was performed at a statewide level; information was collected by surveying a cross-section of all those responsible for Medical Oncology Services in Spain. RESULTS: The survey was completed by key informants, who were selected independently by each service, between September 2010 and April 2011. We were able to gather comprehensive data from a total of 27 Spanish hospitals. These data enabled us to describe the allocation of human and material resources devoted to clinical and translational research across the Medical Oncology Services and to describe the organisational and functional components of these services and units. These data included information pertaining to the activities developed, their funding sources, and their functional dependence on other internal or external bodies. Finally, we explored the degree of dissemination and use of some specific techniques used for the genetic diagnosis of cancer, which have recently been introduced in Medical Oncology within the Spanish healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS:A wide range of variability exists between different oncology services in Spanish hospitals. Time should be spent reflecting on the need and opportunities for improvement in the development of translational research within the field of oncology (AU)

No disponible

Cervical mucus removal before embryo transfer in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To appraise critically the published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on the effectiveness of cervical mucus removal before embryo transfer. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. SETTING: Assisted reproduction technology (ART) units. PATIENT(S): Women undergoing embryo transfer after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI). INTERVENTION(S): Cervical mucus removal followed or not by cervical irrigation immediately before embryo transfer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy, implantation and live-birth rates. RESULT(S): Eight RCTs involving 1,715 women were systematically analyzed. There was substantial heterogeneity among the included trials. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of pregnancy, implantation, or live-birth rates. CONCLUSION(S): A meta-analysis from the available moderate to low quality trials provides very little evidence of an overall benefit of cervical mucus removal before embryo transfer for women undergoing IVF/ICSI. Due to problems of clinical diversity, statistical heterogeneity, and risk of bias, additional pragmatic multicenter RCTs are needed to evaluate the possible small benefit of cervical mucus removal before embryo transfer.

The growth and impact of Alzheimer disease centers as measured by social network analysis.

IMPORTANCE: Alzheimer disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with no effective therapies. In 1984, the National Institute on Aging created the first 5 AD centers (ADCs) in an effort to coordinate research efforts into the pathology and treatment of the disease. Since that time, the ADC program has expanded to include 27 centers in major medical schools throughout the United States. A major aim of ADCs is to develop shared resources, such as tissue samples and patient populations, and thereby promote large-scale, high-impact studies that go beyond the capabilities of any single investigator or institution working in isolation. OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively evaluate the performance of the ADC program over the past 25 years. DESIGN AND SETTING: We systematically harvested every article published by ADC investigators and used social network analysis to analyze copublication networks. RESULTS: A total of 12170 ADC papers were published from 1985 through 2012. The frequency of collaborations has increased greatly from the time that the ADCs were started until the present, even after the expansion of ADCs and the recruitment of new investigators plateaued. Moreover, the collaborations established within the context of the ADC program are increasingly interinstitutional, consistent with the overall goal of the program to catalyze multicenter research teams. Most important, we determined that collaborative multi-ADC research articles are consistently of higher impact than AD articles as a whole. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The ADC program has successfully fostered high-impact, multiuniversity collaborations; we suggest that its structural and administrative features could be replicated in other fields of patient-oriented research.

Comparison of global versus Asian clinical trial strategies supportive of registration of drugs in Japan.

The number of worldwide and Asian multiregional clinical trials (MRCTs) submitted for Japanese New Drug Applications increased markedly between 2009 and 2013, with an increasing number performed for simultaneously submission in the USA, EU, and Japan. Asian studies accounted for 32% of MRCTs (14/44 studies) and had comparatively small sample sizes (<500 subjects). Moreover, the number of Japanese subjects in Asian studies was 2.1- to 13.4-fold larger than the sample size estimated using the method described in Japanese MRCT guidelines, whereas the ratio for worldwide studies was 0.05- to 4.9-fold. Before the introduction of this guidelines, bridging or domestic clinical development strategies were used as the regional development strategy in accordance with ICH E5 guidelines. The results presented herein suggest that Asian studies were conducted when the drug had already been approved in the US/EU, when phase 3 clinical trials were not be planned in the USA/EU, when there was insufficient knowledge of ethnic differences in drug efficacy and safety, or when Caucasian data could not be extrapolated to the Japanese population. New strategies with Asian studies including the Japanese population could be conducted instead of Japanese domestic development strategy.

Decompressive craniectomy for management of traumatic brain injury: an update.

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) for the management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) has a long history but remains controversial. Although DC has been shown to improve both survival and functional outcome in patients with malignant cerebral infarctions, evidence of benefit in patients with TBI is decidedly more mixed. Craniectomy can clearly be life-saving in the presence of medically intractable elevations of intracranial pressure. Craniectomy also has been consistently demonstrated to reduce "therapeutic intensity" in the ICU, to reduce the need for intracranial-pressure-directed and brain-oxygen-directed interventions, and to reduce ICU length of stay. Still, the only randomized trial of DC in TBI failed to demonstrate any benefit. Studies of therapies for TBI, including hemicraniectomy, are challenging owing to the inherent heterogeneity in the pathophysiology observed in this disease. Craniectomy can be life-saving for patients with severe TBI, but many questions remain regarding its ideal application, and the outcome remains highly correlated with the severity of the initial injury.

Outcomes of rotigotine clinical trials: effects on motor and nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease.

Rotigotine transdermal system is a nonergot, 24-hour dopamine agonist approved for the treatment of early and advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Recent studies have demonstrated significant improvements with rotigotine in motor function in early PD and significant improvements in daily off-time and motor function in advanced PD. In addition to motor improvements, nonmotor symptoms have been shown to be improved with rotigotine in both early and advanced PD. Rotigotine has been shown in large, controlled studies to be safe and efficacious for the treatment of motor and some nonmotor symptoms of early and advanced PD.

Collaborative multicenter trials in Latin America: challenges and opportunities in orthopedic and trauma surgery.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE Orthopedic research agendas should be considered from a worldwide perspective. Efforts should be planned as the means for obtaining evidence that is valid for health promotion with global outreach. DESIGN AND SETTING Exploratory study conducted at Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil, and McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. METHODS We identified and analyzed collaborative and multicenter research in Latin America, taking into account American and Canadian efforts as the reference points. We explored aspects of the data available from official sources and used data from traffic accidents as a model for discussing collaborative research in these countries. RESULTS The evaluation showed that the proportion of collaborative and multicenter studies in our setting is small. A brief analysis showed that the death rate due to traffic accidents is very high. Thus, it seems clear to us that initiatives involving collaborative studies are important for defining and better understanding the patterns of injuries resulting from orthopedic trauma and the forms of treatment. Orthopedic research may be an important tool for bringing together orthopedic surgeons, researchers and medical societies for joint action. CONCLUSIONS We have indicated some practical guidelines for initiatives in collaborative research and have proposed some solutions with a summarized plan of action for conducting evidence-based research involving orthopedic trauma.

Implementation of timeline reforms speeds initiation of National Cancer Institute-sponsored trials.

BACKGROUND: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) organized the Operational Efficiency Working Group in 2008 to develop recommendations for improving the speed with which NCI-sponsored clinical trials move from the idea stage to a protocol open to patient enrollment. METHODS: Given the many stakeholders involved, the Operational Efficiency Working Group advised a multifaceted approach to mobilize the entire research community to improve their business processes. New staff positions to monitor progress, protocol-tracking Web sites, and strategically planned conference calls were implemented. NCI staff and clinical teams at Cooperative Groups and Cancer Centers strived to achieve new target timelines but, most important, agreed to abide by absolute deadlines. For phase I-II studies and phase III studies, the target timelines are 7 months and 10 months, whereas the absolute deadlines were set at 18 and 24 months, respectively. Trials not activated by the absolute deadline are automatically disapproved. RESULTS: The initial experience is encouraging and indicates a reduction in development times for phase I-II studies from the historical median of 541 days to a median of 442 days, an 18.3% decrease. The experience with phase III studies to date, although more limited (n = 25), demonstrates a 45.7% decrease in median days. CONCLUSIONS: Based upon this progress, the NCI and the investigator community have agreed to reduce the absolute deadlines to 15 and 18 months for phase I-II and III trials, respectively. Emphasis on initiating trials rapidly is likely to help reduce the time it takes for clinical trial results to reach patients in need of new treatments.

Mortality after clopidogrel in the non-invasive PLATO cohort and TRILOGY ACS trial: another mismatched death paradox.

BACKGROUND: Excess mortality especially in the clopidogrel arm of the PLATO trial raise concerns of data integrity, and call for independent verification of vital records in the national death registries. Recently published data focused on outcomes in patients after non-invasive strategies yielded from the PLATO (PLATO-NIS) and TRILOGY ACS trials allowing comparison of all cause mortality (ACM) between trials. METHODS: To compare the prorated over follow-up duration rates of ACM in the clopidogrel arms of PLATO-NIS cohort and TRILOGY ACS trial. RESULTS: The background clinical characteristics indicate similar if not higher mortality should be expected in TRILOGY ACS. PLATO trial was almost half the duration with a mean follow-up of 277 days compared to TRILOGY ACS (513 days). Matching prorated over follow-up duration of ACM rates in the clopidogrel arm revealed 0.027/day or 9.86% yearly mortality in PLATO-NIS cohort (195 fatalities among 2615 patients enrolled). The ACM rates in TRILOGY ACS (409/4663) were only 0.017/day or 6.2% annually after clopidogrel, suggesting that the risk to die in the control PLATO-NIS group was 63% higher and barely missed significance (p=0.051) compared to TRILOGY ACS. CONCLUSIONS: Prorated over length of follow-up PLATO-NIS mortality rates after clopidogrel far exceeded those observed in a similar medically managed patients in a TRILOGY ACS trial. The background clinical differences between trials are not responsible for the elevated PLATO-NIS mortality numbers. These data further challenge the death paradox reported in the overall PLATO trial and call for the urgent independent verification of vital records.

Advanced MR techniques in multicenter clinical trials.

MRI has had a place in the clinical trials process for more than 20 years. However, for much of that time MRI has been used primarily for subjective interpretation and relatively straightforward structural measurements. More advanced MR techniques have been considered too difficult to implement consistently across multiple sites in a single trial--this despite the fact that these techniques often provide the best window into the direct effects of targeted therapeutics. As an example, numerous compounds are currently under development whose principle effect is to temporarily or permanently alter tumor microvasculature. Changes induced by these compounds typically manifest as reductions in blood flow and vascular permeability within tumors. These changes can be measured directly using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Early studies using this technique were limited to single centers, limiting both the overall size of the studies and the rate at which they were able to accrue patients. Recent efforts, however, have demonstrated that with sufficient attention to protocol design, imaging site selection and training, and analysis standardization, it is possible to obtain consistent and high quality results using even relatively complex acquisition protocols. This article will briefly review both the benefits and the drawbacks of including advanced MR techniques in clinical trial protocols. It will then review in detail the challenges presented by the need to deploy these techniques both to large research institutions and to community imaging centers which may have little or no familiarity with them at the outset of the trial.

Does overweight influence the prognosis of renal cell carcinoma? Results of a multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of overweight on prognosis of renal cell carcinoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 2030 patients who underwent surgery for renal cell carcinoma from 1990 to 2011 in three University Medical Centers were included in this retrospective analysis. For all patients, height and weight measurements at the time of diagnosis were available for review. The median (mean) follow up was 56.6 months (66.0 months). RESULTS: A low body mass index was significantly associated with poor tumor differentiation, histology, microscopic vascular invasion and metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. A lower-than-average body surface area - stratified according to the European average for men (1.98 m(2)) and women (1.74 m(2)) - was significantly related to older age, poor tumor differentiation, the histological subtype and microscopic vascular invasion. In addition, a low visceral fat area calculated in a subgroup of 133 evaluable patients was associated with a higher risk of advanced disease (pT3-4 and/or N/M+) at diagnosis. The tumor-specific 5-year survival rate was 71.3, 78.7 and 80.1%, for patients with a body mass index of, <25, 25-30 and ≥30. Multivariate analysis confirmed body mass index as an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that overweight represents an independent prognostic factor in renal cell carcinoma patients. Further research should address the question of why obese people have a higher incidence of renal cell carcinoma, but at the same time a significantly better prognosis than other patients, particularly in the case of localized disease.