Forced eruption in impacted teeth: analysis of failed cases and outcome of re-operation.

BACKGROUND: Forced eruption of an impacted tooth usually requires surgical and orthodontic interventions to successfully bring the tooth into the dental arch. The clinical time required for a forced eruption is difficult to predict before treatment begins and success rates are affected by several factors before and after an eruption. This study was conducted to identify factors that affect the success of forced eruption, the duration of orthodontic treatment of impacted teeth, and the reasons for re-operation and forced eruption failure in a various teeth and cases. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the records regarding the forced eruption of 468 teeth in 371 patients from June 2006 to May 2020 at the Advanced General Dentistry Department of Yonsei University Dental Hospital were initially examined. The records of 214 teeth in 178 patients who completed orthodontic treatment were included in the analysis. Data on patient demographics, tooth characteristics, orthodontic treatment duration, re-operations, and failures were collected from electronic medical records. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in age between the success and failure forced eruption. Factors significantly affecting treatment duration were apex formation, position, rotation, and re-operation. Re-operation had a 96% success rate. The average orthodontic treatment duration was 29.99 ± 16.93 months, but the average orthodontic treatment duration for teeth that undergone re-operation was 20.36 ± 11.05 months, which was approximately 9 months shorter. Additionally, there was an interaction effect between rotation and re-operation on the duration of orthodontic treatment. The causes for failure of forced eruption in 6 cases were ankyloses (3 cases), incomplete alignment with the normal dental arch (2 cases), and a significant deviation in the impacted tooth's location (1 case). CONCLUSIONS: To increase the success rate of forced eruption, age should be considered as a priority, and in order to predict the treatment period, the apex formation status, position in the arch, and rotation should be considered in addition to age. When determining re-operation, considering factors such as ankylosis, root curvature, and apex formation can help in the success of orthodontic treatment.

A systematic and comprehensive protocol for rapid orthodontic extrusion.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present paper is to describe a systematic and detailed protocol for rapid orthodontic extrusion, and to summarize the main results of this protocol in terms of migration of dental, hard and soft tissues, for 10 cases. CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The working design was to apply a protocol lasting 4 weeks of active phase with intense forces (greater than 300 g), perform weekly the circumferential supra-crestal fiberotomy procedure associated with root-planning, follow up with a passive stabilization phase of another 4 weeks and evaluate the results. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that despite the partial migration of periodontal tissue, the defined protocol we used is, for simplicity of application, brevity of treatment and results, a viable alternative to the surgical technique of clinical crown lengthening in those cases where it is necessary to have more dental tissue exposed for restorative and prosthetic purposes.

The consequences of orthodontic extrusion on previously intruded permanent incisors-A retrospective study.

AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the adverse effects that occur after orthodontic extrusion of teeth that have been traumatically intruded with those of similar teeth that have not experienced any trauma. BACKGROUND: The outcome of incisors intrusion can be affected by the patient's age, extent of injury, root development, and malocclusion. Orthodontic extrusion is a potential solution, but it may also cause complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of the effects of extrusion of traumatically intruded teeth was carried out. The study group included 21 teeth in 14 patients. The control group included 32 teeth in 10 patients that underwent orthodontic extrusion with no history of trauma. Patients' age, gender, and stage of root development were recorded. The severity of the intrusion was classified as mild (<3 mm), moderate (3-6 mm), and severe (≥7 mm). A comparison of signs of pulp necrosis and root resorptions between the groups was made. RESULTS: The central incisor is the tooth that is most injured in 80.9% of cases. A majority of these incidents involve severe intrusion, which was found in 42.9% of cases. 90% of the traumatized teeth had already lost their vitality prior to orthodontic treatment. Various forms of root resorption were observed in the study group. In the control group, 31.2% of teeth showed signs of external root resorption, but no endodontic intervention was carried out during the follow-up period, as these teeth remained vital. CONCLUSIONS: Following intrusion, there is a high risk for root resorption and pulp necrosis. Orthodontic repositioning should be carried out with caution and mild force to prevent complications. Long-term follow-ups are required to ensure the best possible outcome.

Orthodontic tooth extrusion to regenerate missing papilla adjacent to maxillary anterior single implants: A 2- to 7-year retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Regeneration of the missing papilla adjacent to single implants in the esthetic zone has always been challenging, despite advances in vertical hard and soft tissue regeneration. Orthodontic tooth extrusion has been shown to effectively gain alveolar bone and gingival tissue. This retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness of orthodontic tooth extrusion on regenerating missing papilla between existing maxillary anterior single implant and its adjacent tooth. METHODS: Patients who underwent orthodontic tooth extrusion to regenerate missing papilla adjacent to a single implant in the esthetic zone were included in this study. The gingival phenotype, orthodontic extrusion movement, proximal bone level, dento-implant papilla level, facial gingival level, mucogingival junction level, and keratinized tissue width, of the extruded tooth were recorded at pre-orthodontic extrusion (T0 ), post-orthodontic extrusion and retention (T1 ), and latest follow-up (T2 ). RESULTS: A total of 17 maxillary single tooth had orthodontic tooth extrusion to regenerate missing papilla adjacent to 14 maxillary anterior single implants in 14 patients. After a mean follow-up time of 48.4 months, implant success rate was 100% (14/14), with none of the orthodontically extruded teeth being extracted. After a mean extrusion and retention period of 14.3 months, a mean orthodontic extrusion movement of 4.62 ± 0.78 mm was noted with a mean proximal bone level gain of 3.54 ± 0.61 mm (77.0% efficacy), dento-implant papilla level gain of 3.98 ± 0.81 mm (86.8% efficacy), and facial gingival tissue gain of 4.27 mm ± 0.55 mm (93.4% efficacy). A mean keratinized tissue width gain of 4.17 ± 0.49 mm with minimal mean mucogingival junction level change of 0.10 ± 0.30 mm were observed. The efficacy of orthodontic eruption movement on dento-implant papilla gain was less in the thin (80.5%) phenotype group when compared with that in the thick (91.5%) phenotype group. CONCLUSIONS: Within the confines of this study, orthodontic extrusion is an effective, noninvasive method in regenerating mid-term stable proximal bone and papilla adjacent to maxillary anterior single implants. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This retrospective study presents a mid-term result on orthodontic extrusion as a mean to regenerate dento-implant papilla defect. The extended retention period following orthodontic extrusion showed stable and efficacious proximal bone and papilla gain.

[A study on alveolar ridge augmentation guided by orthodontic forced eruption in patients with severe periodontitis].

Objective: To evaluate the clinical effect of alveolar bone augmentation in teeth with severe periodontitis using orthodontic forced eruption. Methods: Twelve patients (5 males and 7 females) with severe periodontitis and malocclusion who visited the Department of Orthodontics and Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from October 2018 to May 2022 were included in this retrospective study. The age was (38.8±6.6) years (24-49 years). A total of 16 maxillary incisors that could not be retained due to severe periodontitis were included. The orthodontic fixed appliance was used to extrude the teeth. Cone-beam CT (CBCT) images of the patients before and after orthodontic forced eruption were collected. The voxel-based registration was used to superpose the images before and after orthodontic forced eruption. The height, thickness, and apical alveolar bone area were measured on the sagittal plane. The alveolar bone volume before and after orthodontic forced eruption was measured using three-dimensional reconstruction technique, and the influencing factors related to the alveolar volume change were analyzed. Results: The results of this study showed that the eruption distance of the teeth was (2.37±0.82) mm, and the alveolar bone height increased by (1.11±0.79) and (0.98±0.79) mm (t=3.73, P=0.010; t=4.85, P<0.001). The proximal and distal alveolar bone height increased by (1.10±0.78) and (0.86±1.08) mm, respectively (t=5.59, P<0.001; t=3.18, P=0.006). The alveolar bone thickness decreased (0.30±0.31) mm (t=-3.75, P=0.002) and alveolar bone area increased (6.84±5.86) mm2 (t=3.71, P<0.001). The alveolar bone volume increased (53±49) mm3 (t=4.38, P<0.001). The alveolar bone volume was moderately positively correlated with eruption distance, apical and mesial alveolar bone thickness (r=0.55, P=0.028; r=0.63, P=0.008; r=0.67, P=0.005). Conclusions: Orthodontic forced eruption results in a favorable increase of the alveolar bone in the upper incisor that cannot be retained due to severe periodontitis, which provides better periodontal hard tissue conditions for subsequent dental implant.

Forced Orthodontic Extrusion to Restore the Unrestorable: A Proof of Concept.

The purpose of this clinical study was to assess the feasibility of forced orthodontic extrusion with the Tissue Master Concept to retain subgingivally fractured teeth as abutments for which extraction and replacement would be equal treatment opportunities. Participants were recruited from a group of consecutive patients in need of prosthodontic rehabilitation. In total, 36 deeply destroyed teeth in 31 patients underwent forced orthodontic extrusion with forces exceeding 50 g to reestablish biologic width and ensure a 2-mm dentin-ferrule design prior to single-crown restoration. The primary endpoint was the success of the extrusion in terms of the ability to restore the respective abutment tooth. Information about overall treatment time, frequency, and reasons for failure were collected. Four patients dropped out of the treatment. For the remaining 27 participants, data were fully collected. The amount of extrusion ranged between 2 and 6 mm (3.5 ± 0.9 mm), and the mean duration until retention was 20 ± 12 days. On average, patients returned three (± 3) times for control visits after extrusion. Adhesive failure (n = 6) and orthodontic relapse (n = 2) were the most frequent complication types. Forced orthodontic extrusion may be a useful tool to restore teeth evaluated as nonrestorable.

Health economic evaluation of forced orthodontic extrusion of extensively damaged teeth: up to 6-year results from a clinical study.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical data on retaining extensively damaged teeth using forced orthodontic extrusion followed by restorative rehabilitation are scarce, and economic evaluations are basically absent. A health economic evaluation of this method was performed based on a clinical study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a convenience sample of individuals recruited from routine care, extensively damaged teeth were orthodontically extruded prior to restoration. Patients were followed up for up to 6 years. The health outcome was tooth retention time. Direct medical, non-medical, and indirect initial and follow-up costs were estimated using the private payer's perspective in German healthcare. Association of initial direct medical treatment costs and cofounding variables was analyzed using generalized linear models. Success and survival were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 35 teeth in 30 patients were followed over a mean ± SD of 49 ± 19 months. Five patients (14%) dropped out during that period. Median initial costs were 1941€ (range: 1284-4392€), median costs for follow-up appointments were 215€ (range: 0-5812€), and median total costs were 2284€ (range: 1453 to 7109€). Endodontic re-treatment and placement of a post had a significant impact on total costs. Three teeth had to be extracted and in three patients orthodontic relapse was observed. The survival and success rates were 91% and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this clinical study, total treatment costs for orthodontic extrusion and subsequent restoration of extensively damaged teeth were considerable. Costs were by large generated initially; endodontic and post-endodontic therapies were main drivers. Costs for retreatments due to complications were limited, as only few complications arose. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The restoration of extensively damaged teeth after forced orthodontic extrusion comes with considerable initial treatment costs, but low follow-up costs. Overall and over the observational period and within German healthcare, costs are below those for tooth replacement using implant-supported crowns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: DRK S00026697).

Manejo de extrusión forzada ortodóntica: Reporte de un caso / Management and Follow-up of Orthodontic Forced Extrusion: A Case Report

El presente caso clínico se enfoca en el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de erupción forzada en un paciente con trauma dental. Objetivo: Proponer una alternativa de tratamiento multidisciplinario el cual permita incrementar estructura dentaria a través de la extrusión forzada y posteriormente rehabilitarlo en función y estética. Métodos: Se describe el caso de un paciente adulto de 78 años de sexo masculino, sano y sin antecedentes patológicos, acude a la clínica de la Especialidad de Ortodoncia y Ortopedia Dentomaxilo facial, referido por un especialista en Endodoncia, debido a fractura corono-radicular de canino superior derecho, pilar de puente fijo de tres unidades En la exploración intraoral presenta fractura cervical de la corona del canino superior derecho. Como primer paso, se realizó tratamiento endodóntico en la pieza dentaria y colocación de un aditamento intraconducto de soporte (endoposte vaciado), con el objeto de mejorar la tracción ortodóntica. Este aditamento consistió en un poste colado con perforaciones. Se procede a colocar aparatología fija en la arcada superior con técnica MBT (slot 0.022), del molar derecho hasta el canino izquierdo de cementado indirecto y pasivo (con los slots de los brackets alineados). Inmediatamente después, se colocó un arco rectangular 0.019 x 0.025 de acero inoxidable con un doblez de extrusión a nivel del canino superior derecho. En el mismo doblez, se adaptó un loop tipo helix que funcionó como apoyo para colocar la ligadura pasiva (lace back). Resultados : El tratamiento realizado en este paciente es satisfactorio, coadyuvando en su estado de salud general mejorando su autoestima. Conclusión: Aquí se aprovecharon todas las ventajas que ofrece la extrusión ortodóntica forzada, incluso en un paciente adulto mayor, logrando una tracción de cuatro milímetros, que se consiguió gracias al empleo de fuerzas extrusivas ligeras y controladas sobre el órgano dentario afectado. Con la modalidad de tratamiento descrita se puede lograr un alargamiento de corona sin la necesidad de realizar una resección ósea, lo que permite una correcta rehabilitación protésica, devolviendo la función y estética al diente lesionado y brindando un beneficio integral al paciente.

The case of an adult patient with a complicated Crown fracture of the right upper canine due to trauma is reported, diagnosing a class VII Ellis coronal fracture. There are several treatment alternatives that range from the extraction, placement of a bone graft and placement of an implant, to a forced root extrusión with bone removal to allow the biological space and subsequently be restored. In the present case, a multidisciplinary orthodontic forced extrusion treatment is performed, which allows to increase the amount of clinical remnant, preserving the periodontal support and maintaining the biologic thickness, thus achieving to maintain the root remnant with good length so that prosthetic rehabilitation is facilitated. The clinical and radiographic follow-up was 12 months. The multidisciplinary treatment involved: Root canal treatment, forced extrusion with orthodontics, fibrotomy with root planing and fixed prosthesis.

Effect of apical root resection, orthodontic extrusion, and surgical crown lengthening on load capability.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the load-to-fracture of procedures changing crown-to-root ratio (RCRR) aimed to restore severely damaged upper central incisors to avoid tooth extraction compared to implant placement. There is no evidence on load capability after apical root resection (AR), orthodontic extrusion (OE), and surgical crown lengthening (SCL) in respect to RCRR, respectively. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Human maxillary central incisors were endodontically treated, decoronated, and divided into 4 groups (n = 48). The following specimen preparation was performed: (I) adhesive core-and-post build-up (control), (II) as (I) and 2 mm apical root resection (AR), (III) before adhesive core-and-post build-up teeth were shortened 2 mm coronally (OE) (IV) as (I), but specimens were embedded 4 mm instead of 2 mm below the CEJ (SCL), group (V) implant-borne restoration with individual all-ceramic abutments (n = 12; ∅4.1/l = 12 mm) (IBR). All specimens received all-ceramic crowns, thermo-mechanical (TML), and subsequent linear loading (LL) until failure. RCRR were calculated and log-rank, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, ANOVA, and chi-square tests applied (p = 0.05). RESULTS: Fracture loads after subsequent LL differed significantly (p = 0.001) between groups, while implants showed the highest values. Fmax median (min/max) were as follows: (I) 252 (204/542), (II) 293 (243/443), (III) 253 (183/371), (IV) 195 (140/274), and (V) 446 (370/539). Pair-wise comparison showed significant differences (p = 0.001) between group I/IV and group V, I, and IV (p = 0.045), II and IV (p = 0.001), and III compared to IV (p = 0.033), respectively. RCRR below 1 significantly increased load capability compared to RCRR = 1. CONCLUSIONS: OE appears to preferably ensure biomechanical stability of teeth that are endodontically treated and receive core-and-post and crown placement compared to SCL. AR has no adverse biomechanical impact. RCRR < 1 is biomechanically beneficial. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: For endodontically treated and restored teeth, orthodontic extrusion should be preferred compared to surgical crown lengthening prior single-crown restoration. As orthodontic extrusion, apical root resection has no adverse effect on load capability. Single-crown implant-borne restorations are most load capable.

Forced Eruption for Implant Site Development Utilizing a CAD/CAM Provisional Fixed Dental Prosthesis: A Case Report.

Preexisting hard and soft tissue defects around hopeless teeth can impede the ideal esthetic and functional outcomes of implant therapy. Orthodontic extrusion has been described as a predictable nonsurgical alternative for vertical hard and soft tissue augmentation, commonly through the use of orthodontic brackets on multiple adjacent teeth. This case report describes an alternative technique via orthodontic extrusion, utilizing a digitally designed and milled fixed provisional restoration. The provisional restoration served as an anchor in the forced eruption of a maxillary lateral incisor for the development of a future implant site. Following forced eruption and a subsequent stabilization period, immediate implant placement was successfully completed with a customized healing abutment to preserve the soft tissue architecture. The use of a fixed provisional restoration as an anchor for orthodontic extrusion allows for predictable implant site development while maintaining favorable esthetics throughout the treatment.

Forced orthodontic extrusion to restore extensively damaged anterior and premolar teeth as abutments for single-crown restorations: Up to 5-year results from a pilot clinical study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Clinical data on orthodontic extrusion to restore teeth deemed unrestorable because of their defect size are scarce. It remains unclear for which defects forced orthodontic extrusion and tooth retention is preferred to extraction. PURPOSE: The purpose of this pilot clinical study was to investigate the survival, frequency, and type of complications of extensively damaged teeth requiring single-crown restorations after forced orthodontic extrusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Participants were recruited from consecutive patients in need of restorative treatment of extensively damaged teeth at a university clinic. The teeth were orthodontically extruded to reestablish the biologic width and to ensure a 2-mm ferrule preparation before restoration. The primary endpoint was restoration success and survival. At recall, survival was defined as the tooth being in situ and success as a symptom-free tooth with an intact, caries-free restoration and with physiological pocket probing depths, no signs of intrusion, ankylosis, root resorption, or periapical radiolucency. Recalls were performed every 6 months; the outcome was assessed by radiographic and clinical evaluation after up to 5 years of clinical service. Quantitative parameters were described with mean values and standard deviations. RESULTS: Thirty-four participants were assessed for eligibility and enrolled (mean ±standard deviation age: 53.4 ±18.9 years). Four participants were premature dropouts. Data were analyzed for 35 teeth in 30 participants. The amount of extrusion varied between 2 and 6 mm (mean ±standard deviation 3.4 ±0.9 mm). The mean duration of extrusion was 18.9 ±12.6 days and the mean duration of retention was 126.94 ±88.1 days. The mean ±standard deviation crown-to-root ratio after treatment was 0.8 ±0.1 (range: 0.5 to 1.0). Three participants exhibited orthodontic relapse before restoration. Teeth were successfully restored after repeated extrusion. After a mean observation period of 3.3 years (range: 1 to 5.2 years), 29 of 31 teeth were still in situ. Two teeth were fractured, and 4 participants were not available for recall. Thus, the survival rate was 94%. No resorption or periapical translucencies were observed radiographically. Clinical examinations revealed physiological probing depths and absence of ankyloses. One tooth presented with marginal bone loss. The most frequent type of complication was orthodontic relapse at recall (n=3). A total of 84% of teeth were considered a success. CONCLUSIONS: Forced orthodontic extrusion allowed for the restoration of anterior and premolar teeth deemed as nonrestorable because of their defect size. Tooth retention of extensively damaged teeth and their use as abutments for single-crown restorations can be recommended.

Orthodontic management of a horizontally impacted maxillary incisor in an adolescent patient.

Horizontal maxillary incisor impaction is not common, but it affects facial esthetics, phonetics, and the patient's self-esteem. Therefore, it is necessary to manage this problem as early as possible. This case report presents a patient with an unerupted maxillary left central incisor combined with anterior and left posterior crossbite, edge-to-edge overbite on the right and left anterior open bite, low smile line, and mild skeletal Class III discrepancy. The treatment consisted of 3 stages: (1) maxillary expansion and sufficient space creation for the impacted tooth; (2) surgical exposure by closed-eruption technique; and (3) induced eruption of impaction. The treatment outcome was highly favorable. Maxillary impaction erupted in the proper position with a normal clinical crown height and consonant gingival line with the adjacent teeth. Maxillary and mandibular teeth had normal and stable occlusion. The 3-year follow-up demonstrated an esthetically functional outcome after orthodontically induced tooth eruption. This treatment required a good treatment plan by the orthodontist to obtain satisfactory results.

A Novel Approach for Orthodontic Extrusion Prior to Intentional Replantation: A Case Report.

AIM: This case report aimed to present a novel surgical technique involving orthodontics luxation of the offended tooth using miniscrew prior to performing intentional replantation (IR) to remove an extruded separated instrument that injured the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). BACKGROUND: Intentional replantation is a dental procedure that involves extracting a tooth, managing the root canal, and then reinserting the tooth back into its socket. This procedure is typically used as a last resort when other treatment options have failed or are not possible. Intentional replantation can be successful in preserving the tooth and preventing tooth loss, but it is important to note that there are risks involved. Maintaining the viability of the periodontal ligament (PDL) is a pivotal step to achieve a favorable outcome. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 15-year-old female patient came to the clinic complaining of electric-like pain in the left mandibular posterior area that radiated to the left ear and sometimes caused a headache. Upon clinical and radiographic evaluation, extruded endodontic file from the mesial root of the left first molar that penetrated the IAN canal was noticed. Nonsurgical root canal retreatment was performed, which failed to retrieve the separated file. Orthodontics luxation of the offended tooth was done 2 weeks before the surgical intervention using a miniscrew to induce PDL inflammation, which increased the tooth mobility and PDL volume, facilitating the atraumatic extraction and reduced the risk of complications, such as root resorption and ankylosis. Then, IR was performed, and the extruded file was successfully retrieved. Three months follow-up showed complete recovery of the endodontics-related IAN injury symptoms. Preapical radiographic evaluation and cone-beam computed tomography scan showed complete healing of the periapical radiolucency/area of low density and complete formation of the PDL space and lamina dura around the resected roots. CONCLUSION: This novel approach using a miniscrew suggests a noninvasive technique that minimizes the damage to the offended tooth surrounding tissues as well as minimizing the morbidity of the adjacent teeth and the vital anatomical structures. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Multidisciplinary comprehensive preplanning of complicated cases is essential to maximize treatment efficiency. The orthodontic extrusion facilitates the extraction process that helps in preserving the PDL, and ultimately increases the survivability of the teeth. How to cite this article: Alharbi MA, Alghamdi BA, Alswajy WA, et al. A Novel Approach for Orthodontic Extrusion Prior to Intentional Replantation: A Case Report. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(11):895-901.

Rehabilitación de dientes con pronóstico imposible mediante extrusión quirúrgica: a propósito de un caso / Surgical extrusion for restoring impossible prognosis teeth: case report

La extrusión quirúrgica es una alternativa terapéutica que persigue el desplazamiento coronal de aquellos dientes con márgenes subgingivales y limitada estructura remanente. El correcto diag nóstico de cada caso y la aplicación de una técnica mínimamente traumática serán clave en el éxito del tratamiento. En la presente revisión, a propósito de un caso con 12 meses de seguimiento, se analizan los factores críticos del procedi miento (AU)

Surgical extrusion is a therapeutic alternative that pursues the coronal displacement of those teeth with subgingival margins and limited remaining structure. The correct diagnosis of each case and the application of a minimally traumatic technique will be key to the success of the treatment. In this review, about a case with 12 months of follow-up, the critical factors of the procedure are analyzed (AU)

Long-Term Follow-up of an Esthetically Demanding Case Using Slow Orthodontic Extrusion: A Case Report.

An internal root resorption lesion in the maxillary right central incisor was treated with orthodontic extrusion to improve the surrounding soft and hard tissue. Simultaneously with extraction, socket preservation was performed. After 4 months of healing, guided bone regeneration was performed and an implant was placed. At the second surgical phase, a flap was coronally advanced, and a connective tissue graft was placed. The emergence profile was modeled with a provisional crown before the final crown. The result was successful and well maintained over the 10-year follow-up period. The hard and soft tissue levels were stable, and no signs of inflammation were observed.

Evaluation of Long-Term Efficacy of Forced Erupted Teeth for Restorative Purposes: A Clinical Retrospective Study.

This retrospective study evaluated the long-term stability of teeth that were orthodontically treated with forced eruption for restorative purposes. A total of 25 participants with a total of 36 orthodontically extruded teeth were included in the study. The measured clinical parameters included (1) pre- and posttreatment radiographs, (2) activation time, (3) retention time, (4) total treatment time, (5) additional treatment required to restore the teeth, and (6) pre- and postsurgical complications. The results show a 96.0% survival rate for force-erupted teeth, with a 4.0% failure rate due to nonrestorable caries. When more than 1.0 mm of extrusion was completed, there was a statistically significantly higher chance that the tooth required additional surgeries (P < .05). Complications during treatment were higher in clinicians without orthodontic training (43.0%) vs clinicians with orthodontic training (10.0%). Forced eruption for prosthetic treatment and implant site development is a viable treatment option and is successful in the long-term.

Prosthetic restoration after atraumatic surgical extrusion: a report of two cases.

Preservation and restoration of teeth with little coronal tooth structure due to crown-root fractures or caries lesions, ensuring restoration margins do not encroach on the biologic width, constitute a challenge. Available treatment options include surgical crown lengthening and orthodontic or surgical extrusion. This report presents two patients in which teeth were restored by surgical extrusion with an atraumatic extraction system and prosthetic therapy.

Tooth preservation of deeply destroyed teeth by forced orthodontic extrusion: A case series.

Maintaining and restoring teeth exhibiting subgingival or even subcrestal defect extensions represent a common problem in daily practice. Such teeth are often deemed "unrestorable" due to a significant hard tissue loss and defect locations violating the biologic width. In order to achieve a sufficient 2-mm-ferrule design and reestablish the biologic width, both surgical crown lengthening and orthodontic extrusion have been suggested. However, surgical crown lengthening has a negative effect on the attachment level of adjacent teeth as well as esthetic disadvantages particularly in the esthetic zone. Therefore, orthodontic extrusion might be considered as a valid therapeutic alternative since gingival architecture is maintained. While most orthodontic appliances are too complex for daily application, forced orthodontic extrusion by means of the Tissue Master Concept might be a cost- and time-effective approach due to advances in adhesive and computer-assisted dentistry. This clinical case series illustrates the methodology of the rather straightforward Tissue Master Concept in specific clinical situations that may occur in clinical routine.