HNF-1ß as an immunohistochemical marker for distinguishing chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and hybrid oncocytic tumors from renal oncocytoma.

The histologic features of renal oncocytoma (RO) are similar to those for the more aggressive chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC). To assess immunohistochemical markers of the two, the sensitivity and specificity of cytokeratin 7 (CK7) and C-kit, as well as hepatocyte nuclear factor-1ß (HNF-1ß), were analyzed. Typical cases of ChRCC and RO at Severance Hospital between July 2014 and July 2018 were selected retrospectively. Among 44 cases, 17 were unanimously compatible with ChRCC, 16 were RO, and 11 cases were indeterminate. Samples from all selected cases were used for immunostaining with antibodies against CK7, C-kit, HNF-1ß, and CD10. Immunostaining demonstrated complete loss of HNF-1ß expression in 11 out of 17 (64.7%) ChRCC cases and a partial, but significant loss in > 50% of tumor cells in the remaining 6 cases (35.3%). In contrast, HNF-1ß expression was preserved in tumor cells of RO cases. Fourteen of 17 ChRCC cases (82.4%) were diffusely positive for CK7, whereas cases of RO were focal positive or negative. C-kit staining did not show a significant difference between ChRCC and RO. Two of five ChRCC cases showing diffuse immunoreactivity for CD10 had poor prognoses of local invasion, distant metastasis, or death. Loss of HNF-1ß expression is a useful marker with which to diagnose ChRCC, especially in cases with confusing histologic findings or equivocal CK7 staining. Additionally, CD10 staining in high-grade ChRCC aids in diagnosis and prediction of the clinical prognosis.

Napsin A, Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor-1-Beta (HNF-1ß), Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors Expression in Arias-Stella Reaction.

BACKGROUND: The Arias-Stella reaction (ASR) can mimic endometrial clear cell carcinoma (ECCC) in small biopsies, especially when drug or pregnancy history is unknown. A panel of immunohistochemical markers comprising napsin A, hepatocyte nuclear factor-1-beta (HNF-1ß), estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER, PR) has been found useful in confirming a diagnosis of ECCC. However, the detailed characterization of how expression of this combination of markers in the ECCC mimics ASR has yet to be thoroughly evaluated. DESIGN: The frequency and extent of napsin A, HNF-1ß, ER, and PR expression in ASR were assessed in a large series. For napsin A, any cytoplasmic staining was considered positive while only nuclear staining was deemed to be positive for HNF-1ß, ER, and PR. Immunohistochemical histoscores based on the intensity and extent of staining were calculated. RESULTS: Forty cases were gestational and 10 were nongestational ASR. In 19 (38%), the reaction was extensive and involved >50% of the glands. A stromal decidual change was found in 31 (77.5%) of the gestational and 3 (30%) of the nongestational cases. Napsin A was positive in all gestational and 8 of 10 (80%) nongestational ASR. All ASR showed HNF-1ß expression. ER expression was reduced in 37 (92.5%) and lost in 3 (7.5%) gestational ASR, and reduced in 9 (90%) and lost in 1 (10%) of nongestational ASR. None of the ASR in our series expressed PR. CONCLUSIONS: Naspin A and HNF-1ß were frequently expressed in both gestational and nongestational ASR, and ER expression was usually either reduced or loss. Interpretation of these markers in small biopsies containing atypical clear cells should be made with caution.

Role of HNF1ß in the differential diagnosis of yolk sac tumor from other germ cell tumors.

Identification of the yolk sac tumor (YST) component in germ cell tumors (GCT) may prove challenging, and highly sensitive and specific immunohistochemical markers are still lacking. Preliminary data from the literature suggest that HNF1ß may represent a sensitive marker of YST. The specificity of HNF1ß has not been addressed in GCT. A cohort of 49 YST specimens from 45 patients was designed, occurring either as pure tumors, or as a component of a mixed GCT. Immunohistochemistry was conducted on whole tumor sections using HNF1ß. SALL4, OCT4, CD30, CDX2, Cytokeratin 19, Glypican 3, and GATA3 were used for classification of the GCT components. Patients were mostly male (39/45), aged 14 months to 49 years, with primary testicular tumors (37/39), or primary mediastinal pure YSTs (2/39). All 6 primary tumors occurring in females (6/45) were pure ovarian YSTs; age range was 4 to 72 years. HNF1ß nuclear reactivity was seen in the YST component in all 49 tumors, with a moderate to strong nuclear pattern of staining. Embryonal carcinoma (EC, 0/32) and seminoma (0/6) were negative. Choriocarcinoma (6/6) showed faint focal cytoplasmic reactivity to HNF1ß but no nuclear staining. In teratomas, only enteric-type glands showed nuclear reactivity to HNF1ß (11/16). Therefore, HNF1ß sensitivity in YST component identification was 100% and specificity was 80%. Thus, in our experience, HNF1ß is a sensitive and reliable marker of the YST component in GCT, and allows distinction of YST from intricately admixed EC, especially in the diffuse embryoma pattern.

Diagnostic value of dual detection of hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 beta (HNF-1ß) and napsin A for diagnosing ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

We evaluated the diagnostic value of hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 beta (HNF-1ß) and napsin A for diagnosing ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Immunohistochemical EnVision was used to measure HNF-1ß and napsin A expression in 38 cases of ovarian clear cell carcinoma, 30 cases of high-grade serous carcinoma, 22 cases of endometrioid adenocarcinoma, and 16 metastatic Krukenberg tumor cases. Then we found that HNF-1ß appeared in all ovarian clear cell carcinoma and was less common in high-grade serous and endometrioid adenocarcinoma (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference in HNF-1ß between clear cell carcinoma and metastatic Krukenberg tumor was found (P > 0.05). Napsin A was expressed in 97.4% of ovarian clear cell carcinoma, 6.7% high-grade serous carcinoma, 22.7% endometrioid adenocarcinoma, and 0% metastatic Krukenberg tumors. Napsin A in clear cell carcinoma was greater than that found in high-grade serous carcinoma, endometrioid adenocarcinoma, and metastatic Krukenberg tumor (P < 0.05). Sensitivity and specificity of HNF-1ß and napsin A for diagnosing ovarian clear cell carcinoma was 100% and 54.4%, and 97.4% and 89.7%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of HNF-1ß and napsin A for diagnosing ovarian clear cell carcinoma was 97.4% and 91.2%, respectively. So it is concluded that HNF-1ß and napsin A are more sensitive than currently used markers for diagnosing ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Moreover, napsin A is more specific than HNF-1ß. Combining HNF-1ß and napsin A may distinguish clear cell carcinoma from high-grade serous carcinoma, endometrioid adenocarcinoma and metastatic Krukenberg tumors.

Expression of HNF-1ß in cervical carcinomas: an immunohistochemical study of 155 cases.

BACKGROUND: HNF-1ß is a commonly used marker in the differential diagnosis of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary and endometrium. Recent studies have found HNF-1ß expression to a lesser extent in other ovarian and endometrial tumors including endometrioid, mucinous and, rarely, serous carcinoma. Regarding cervical carcinoma, HNF-1ß expression has been mentioned exceptionally in mesonephric and some other types of adenocarcinoma. However, a systematic analysis of HNF-1ß expression in cervical carcinomas has not been performed to date. METHODS: We analyzed HNF-1ß expression in 155 cervical carcinomas (including 56 adenocarcinomas, 85 squamous cell carcinomas and 14 undifferentiated carcinomas). Expression of HNF-1ß was correlated with the expression of other markers including estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, CEA, p63, p40, p16, and D2-40. RESULTS: Adenocarcinomas showed expression of HNF-1ß in 42/56 cases (75%), CEA in 48/56 cases (85.7%), p63 in 4/56 cases (7.2%), p40 in 2/56 cases (3.6%), estrogen receptors in 9/56 cases (16.1%), progesterone receptors in 5/56 cases (8.9%), p16 in 56/56 (100%) cases, and D2-40 in 0/56 cases (0%). Squamous cell carcinomas showed expression of HNF-1ß in 2/85 cases (2.35%), CEA in 77/85 cases (90.6%), p63 and p40 in 85/85 cases (100%), estrogen receptors in 9/85 cases (10.6%), progesterone receptors in 1/85 cases (1.2%), p16 in 84/85 cases (98.8%), and D2-40 in 45/84 cases (53.6%). Undifferentiated carcinomas showed expression of HNF-1ß in 2/14 cases (14.3%), CEA in 8/14 cases (57.1%), p16 in 14/14 cases (100%), hormone receptors in 0/13 cases (0%), p63 in 7/14 cases (50%), p40 in 5/14 cases (35.7%), and D2-40 in 1/14 cases (7.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In cervical carcinoma, expression of HNF-1ß is mostly restricted to adenocarcinomas and can be used as an auxiliary adenocarcinoma marker in the differential diagnosis of poorly differentiated cervical carcinomas. HNF-1ß as an adenocarcinoma marker and p63/p40 and D2-40 as a squamous cell carcinoma markers are highly specific with variable sensitivity. Optimal results can be achieved using these markers in a panel. VIRTUAL SLIDES: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1348836442160205 .

Immunohistochemical Comparison of Ovarian and Uterine Endometrioid Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma With Clear Cell Change, and Clear Cell Carcinoma.

Accurate distinction of clear cell carcinoma (CCC) from endometrioid carcinoma (EC) has important clinical implications, but, not infrequently, EC demonstrates clear cell change (EC-CC), mimicking CCC. We examined whether a panel of immunomarkers can help distinguish between these tumors. Sixty-four CCCs (40 ovarian and 24 uterine), 34 ECs (21 ovarian and 13 uterine), and 34 EC-CCs (6 ovarian and 28 uterine) were stained for HNF1ß, BAF250a, Napsin A, ER, and PR. Intensity and extent of immunoreactivity was assessed. Fifty-seven of 64 (89%) CCCs, 14/34 (41%) EC-CCs, and 16/34 (47%) ECs expressed HNF1ß, and 56/64 (88%) CCCs, 4/34 (12%) EC-CCs, and 1/34 (3%) ECs stained for Napsin A. Most CCCs demonstrated at least moderate and diffuse staining for both markers, whereas only focal and weak expression was identified in most EC-CC/EC. Compared to HNF1ß, Napsin A showed increased specificity (93.0% vs. 55.9%, P<0.0001) and similar sensitivity (87.5% vs. 89.1%) in distinguishing CCC from EC-CC/EC. Thirteen of 64 (20%) CCCs, 6/34 (18%) EC-CCs, and 2/34 (6%) ECs showed loss of BAF250a. ER was expressed by 10/64 (16%) CCCs, 30/34 (88%) EC-CCs, and 33/34 (97%) ECs, whereas PR positivity was identified in 9/64 (14%) CCCs, 26/34 (77%) EC-CCs, and 33/34 (97%) ECs. The majority of EC and EC-CC demonstrated diffuse staining for ER/PR, whereas most CCCs showed very focal positivity. There is a statistically significant difference in HNF1ß, Napsin A, ER, and PR immunoexpression between CCC and EC/EC-CC, with Napsin A being a more specific marker for CCC than HNF1ß. Overall, the immunoprofile of EC-CC is more comparable to that of EC than CCC. The use of a panel of immunostains can help distinguish EC-CC from CCC.

Clinicopathological heterogeneity in ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma: a study on individual therapy practice.

Ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma (CCA) has been believed to be a lethal histological subtype of an epithelial ovarian adenocarcinoma (EOA); its precursor has been assumed to be endometriosis. However, it has been reported that CCAs occasionally exhibit different clinical behaviors, suggesting that CCAs might not belong to a single category. We focused on CCAs combined with other histological types of EOAs; we re-evaluated the pathology of 46 CCAs and divided them into two subgroups: 35 CCAs alone (pure-type CCAs); and 11 CCAs with other histological types, endometrioid adenocarcinomas (EAs) or/and serous adenocarcinomas (SAs) (mixed-type CCAs). Immunohistochemical analysis for expression of ARID1A, p53, PTEN, Annexin 4, hepatocyte nuclear factor-1ß (HNF-1ß), and WT-1 was employed. We identified that patients with endometriosis were younger than those without endometriosis in pure-type CCAs (P < 0.005). In mixed-type CCAs, the immunohistochemical-staining patterns revealed internal transition of each histological component. In pure-type CCAs, expressions of ARID1A and p53 were mutually altered, and altered expression of p53 was associated with worse prognosis than that of ARID1A (P < 0.001). Our results provide evidence that CCAs would have clinicopathological heterogeneity, determining the patient's prognosis. Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis may shed light on the selection of appropriate treatment, including chemotherapy.

Hepatocyte nuclear factor-1ß is not a specific marker of clear cell carcinoma in serous effusions.

BACKGROUND: The transcription factor hepatocyte nuclear factor-1ß (HNF1ß) has been reported to be a specific clear cell carcinoma marker, but its role in the diagnosis of serous effusions is largely unexplored. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic role of 2 commercial antibodies against HNF1ß in effusion specimens. METHODS: Effusions (n = 101), consisting of 43 ovarian adenocarcinomas (26 serous, 14 clear cell, 3 endometrioid), 37 nonovarian adenocarcinomas, 10 malignant mesotheliomas, 2 nonepithelial cancers, and 9 reactive specimens, were immunostained using antibodies from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc (Santa Cruz, Calif) and Atlas Antibodies AB (Stockholm, Sweden). RESULTS: Use of the Santa Cruz antibody was associated with cytoplasmic or background staining in some specimens, whereas distinct staining with minimal background was observed using the Atlas antibody. The Santa Cruz antibody performed better in differentiating clear cell carcinoma from serous ovarian carcinoma and breast carcinoma, whereas staining was consistently negative in benign and malignant mesotheliomas using both antibodies. Distinct nuclear expression of HNF1ß was observed in lung and gastrointestinal carcinomas, most often using the Atlas antibody. CONCLUSIONS: The HNF1ß antibody from Atlas performed better than its counterpart from Santa Cruz in terms of staining quality, but was less specific for clear cell carcinoma. Although HNF1ß may be of diagnostic value in differentiating clear cell from serous carcinoma in cases with proven genital origin, the role of this marker is questionable in the differential diagnosis between the former tumors and adenocarcinomas of other origin, particularly in the setting of metastasis from an unknown primary tumor.

Ovarian cancers arising from endometriosis: a microenvironmental biomarker study including ER, HNF1ß, p53, PTEN, BAF250a, and COX-2.

BACKGROUND: The microenvironmental biomarkers of different subtypes of ovarian cancers arising from endometriosis have not been studied in Taiwan. Their expression can help in understanding the carcinogenic mechanism. METHODS: Our study used immunohistochemistry to compare the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), hepatocyte nuclear factor-1 beta (HNF1ß), p53, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), BAF250a, and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) among 79 cases of endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers, including 40 (50%) clear cell carcinomas (CCCs), 33 (41%) endometrioid (EM) adenocarcinomas, four (5%) serous carcinomas, one adenosquamous carcinoma, and one adenosarcoma. RESULTS: Positive stainings for ER, HNF1ß, p53, and COX-2 were identified in 34 (43%), 30 (38%), 10 (13%), and 44 (56%) cases. Loss of PTEN and BAF250a were noted in 29 (37%) and 37 (47%) cases. The expression of ER was reversely correlated with that of HNF1ß (rho = -0.417, p < 0.001) and correlated with p53 (rho = 0.284, p = 0.011). ER positivity was commonly identified in EM adenocarcinomas (91%), and rarely in CCCs (8%) and serous carcinoma (0%; p < 0.001). By contrast, HNF1ß expression was frequently noted in CCCs (65%) and serous carcinomas (50%), but less in EM adenocarcinoma (6%; p < 0.001). All staining results were similar between atypical endometriosis glandular epithelium and contiguous malignant parts. Only nine cases showed 10 minor differences (10/474, 2%) in ER, HNF1ß, and BAF250a. For the staining patterns of p53, COX-2, and PTEN, there was no difference between the invasive and precursor parts. CONCLUSION: Our results supported the suggestion that estrogen-dependent ovarian cancer arising from endometriosis is substantially more associated with EM adenocarcinoma than CCCs. The positive HNF1ß staining was a frequent finding in CCCs, but not in EM adenocarcinoma. The similar staining patterns of atypical endometriosis glandular cells with the invasive parts confirmed their precursor status.

Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1ß is a novel prognostic marker independent of the Milan criteria in transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective analysis based on tissue microarrays.

We retrospectively investigated the prognostic value of hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 (HNF1) proteins in 159 liver transplant patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including 36 (22.6%) exceeding the Milan criteria. The expression of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), HNF1α, and HNF1ß was examined with immunohistochemistry on duplicate tissue microarray slides containing HCC tumor explants. The times to recurrence and cancer death were analyzed with a Cox regression model and were compared according to the expression of markers of interest. We compared risk predictions with area under the receiver operator curves (AUROCs) and C statistics. AFP, HNF1α, and HNF1ß were positive in 22.6%, 46.5%, and 61.0% of the tumor immunoprofiles, respectively. Although several variables were associated with the times to recurrence and cancer death in univariate Cox analyses, only AFP expression for the time to recurrence and the Milan criteria and HNF1ß expression for the times to recurrence and cancer death remained significant after multivariate adjustments. The expression of HNF1ß (but not HNF1α) was related to a serum AFP level ≥ 200 ng/mL, microvascular invasion, and AFP expression (P < 0.05 for all). A subgroup analysis showed that in the group meeting the Milan criteria, recurrence and cancer death rates at 10 years in the HNF1ß-negative patients were approximately one-tenth of those in the HNF1ß-positive patients, but the difference was not significant in the group exceeding the Milan criteria. The addition of HNF1ß expression to the Milan criteria increased the C statistics and AUROCs for both recurrence and mortality (P < 0.05 for all). In conclusion, the immunohistological detection of HNF1ß predicts recurrence and HCC-specific death after transplantation and provides an additive benefit in comparison with the Milan selection criteria on their own.

Morphologic spectrum of immunohistochemically characterized clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a study of 155 cases.

Establishing a diagnosis of ovarian clear cell carcinoma (O-CCC) can be subject to significant interobserver variation. Accurately diagnosing this tumor is important because of its chemoresistance and reported association with Lynch syndrome. The spectrum of the morphologic features of O-CCC has not been well described in a series composed of immunohistochemically characterized cases. A total of 155 cases diagnosed as O-CCC were retrieved from the files of 3 institutions to analyze architectural and cytologic features. The immunohistochemical features of these cases have been reported earlier. A comprehensive list of features was recorded, including, but not limited to, architectural patterns, nuclear appearance, cytoplasmic characteristics, and mitotic index. Between 1 and 13 slides were available for review for each case. The cases were divided into 2 groups based on morphologic characteristics, those with features shared by the large majority (the first group, n=138) and those that showed unusual characteristics (second group, n=17). Tumors in the first group typically showed a mixture of architectural patterns, the most frequent being papillary and tubulocystic. Papillae, usually small and round and lacking hierarchical branching and tufting or stratification of more than 3 cells, were present at least focally in almost 3 of 4 cases. The cell shape was predominantly cuboidal, not columnar. Nuclear pleomorphism and prominent nucleoli were frequently present, but never diffusely. Clear cytoplasm was found in nearly every case and hobnail cells were common. Mitoses exhibited a range from 0 to 13 with an average of 3 to 4 per 10 high power fields. The second group of tumors showed numerous unusual morphologic characteristics, despite the presence of clear cytoplasm, including those typically seen in other ovarian epithelial tumors, such as serous and endometrioid carcinoma. Eighty-nine percent of tumors from the first group showed the expected "O-CCC immunophenotype" [hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF) positive, and estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) and p53 negative], whereas 4% of tumors showed HNF positivity along with focal ER or PR expression. Seven percent of tumors were not immunoreactive with these markers. Twenty-nine percent of tumors in the second group showed the O-CCC immunophenotype, whereas 24% of tumors were p53 positive, 5% of tumors were WT1 positive, and the remaining cases were negative for all markers. Ninety-seven percent (112 of 117) of HNF-positive tumors in this series were classical O-CCC. Therefore, O-CCC has characteristic morphologic features and a specific, if not unique, immunophenotype in the vast majority of the cases. Clear cell-rich tumors with features that depart from the classical morphologic appearances described herein should suggest the possibility of an alternative diagnosis.

Expanded clinical spectrum in hepatocyte nuclear factor 1b-maturity-onset diabetes of the young.

AIMS: HNF1B-maturity-onset diabetes of the young is caused by abnormalities in the HNF1B gene encoding the transcription factor HNF-1beta. We aimed to investigate detailed clinical features and the type of HNF1B gene anomaly in five pediatric cases with HNF1B-MODY. METHODS: From a cohort of 995 children and adolescents with diabetes, we analyzed the most frequent maturity-onset diabetes of the young genes (GCK, HNF1A, HNF4A) including HNF1B sequencing and deletion analysis by quantitative Multiplex-PCR of Short Fluorescent Fragments (QMPSF) if patients were islet autoantibody-negative and had one parent with diabetes or associated extrapancreatic features or detectable C-peptide outside honeymoon phase. Presence and size of disease-causing chromosomal rearrangements detected by QMPSF were further analyzed by array comparative genomic hybridization. RESULTS: Overall, five patients had a heterozygous HNF1B deletion, presenting renal disease, elevated liver enzymes, and diabetes. Diabetes was characterized by insulin resistance and adolescent onset of hyperglycemia. Additionally, clinical features in some patients were pancreas dysplasia and exocrine insufficiency (two of five patients), genital defects (three of five), mental retardation (two of five), and eye abnormalities (coloboma, cataract in two of five). One case also had severe growth deficit combined with congenital cholestasis, and another case had common variable immune deficiency. All patients reported here had monoallelic loss of the entire HNF1B gene. Whole genome array comparative genomic hybridization confirmed a precurrent genomic deletion of approximately 1.3-1.7 Mb in size. CONCLUSION: The clinical data of our cases enlarge the wide spectrum of patients with HNF1B anomaly. The underlying molecular defect in all cases was a 1.3- to 1.7-Mb deletion, and paired, segmental duplications along with breakpoints were most likely involved in this recurrent chromosomal microdeletion.

Clear cell carcinoma of the pancreas: histopathologic features and a unique biomarker: hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta.

Clear cell carcinoma as a variant of ductal carcinoma of the pancreas is not well recognized. Hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta as a transcription factor has been identified as a specific biomarker of clear cell tumor of the female genital tract. The aim of this study was to systematically analyze clear cell carcinoma of the pancreas and its unique biomarker hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta. A total of 84 pancreatic adenocarcinomas were analyzed pathologically and with an immunohistochemical approach with hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta antibody. The identified clear cell carcinomas were further studied by PAS, DPAS, and mucicarmine stains. Pathologic features and clinical follow-up were documented. Of them, 20 (24%) pancreatic adenocarcinomas were identified with clear cell features, including 12 clear cell carcinomas and 8 ductal adenocarcinomas with clear cell component (defined as less than 75% of tumor with clear cells). Cytologically, the clear cell carcinomas exhibited clear cytoplasm with centrally located, atypical nuclei. PAS, DPAS, and mucicarmine stains confirmed that the clear cytoplasm was not due to accumulation of glycogen or mucin. The results of immunostaining showed that hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta is overexpressed in all clear cell carcinomas and in the clear cell components of eight ductal carcinomas with clear cell features. In contrast, in usual ductal adenocarcinoma, hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta exhibited overall weak or focally moderate staining; only eight cases were strongly positive (15%) of which 38% were high grade and 63% were moderate grade. However, when included with the strong staining cases in mixed and clear cell carcinoma, this group regardless of morphology appeared to correlate with worse survival compared to the group with weak hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta staining across morphologies (P<0.01). Thus, clear cell carcinoma of the pancreas is not an uncommon variant of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta is a useful marker to identify these clear cell carcinomas, and its overexpression may aid in stratifying survival rate.

Analysis of liver repair mechanisms in Alagille syndrome and biliary atresia reveals a role for notch signaling.

Patients with Alagille syndrome (AGS), a genetic disorder of Notch signaling, suffer from severe ductopenia and cholestasis, but progression to biliary cirrhosis is rare. Instead, in biliary atresia (BA) severe cholestasis is associated with a pronounced "ductular reaction" and rapid progression to biliary cirrhosis. Given the role of Notch in biliary development, we hypothesized that defective Notch signaling would influence the reparative mechanisms in cholestatic cholangiopathies. Thus we compared phenotype and relative abundance of the epithelial components of the hepatic reparative complex in AGS (n = 10) and BA (n = 30) using immunohistochemistry and computer-assisted morphometry. BA was characterized by an increase in reactive ductular and hepatic progenitor cells, whereas in AGS, a striking increase in intermediate hepatobiliary cells contrasted with the near absence of reactive ductular cells and hepatic progenitor cells. Hepatocellular mitoinhibition index (p21(waf1)/Ki67) was similar in AGS and BA. Fibrosis was more severe in BA, where portal septa thickness positively correlated with reactive ductular cells and hepatic progenitor cells. AGS hepatobiliary cells failed to express hepatic nuclear factor (HNF) 1beta, a biliary-specific transcription factor. These data indicate that Notch signaling plays a role in liver repair mechanisms in postnatal life: its defect results in absent reactive ductular cells and accumulation of hepatobiliary cells lacking HNF1beta, thus being unable to switch to a biliary phenotype.