Transcription factor immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of pituitary tumours.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical utility and prognostic value of WHO 2017 lineage-based classification of pituitary tumours have not been assessed. This study aimed to (1) determine the clinical utility of transcription factor analysis for classification of pituitary tumours and (2) determine the prognostic value of improved lineage-based classification of pituitary tumours. METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of patients who underwent surgical resection of pituitary tumours at St Vincent's Public and Private Hospitals, Sydney, Australia between 1990 and 2016. Included patients were at least 18 years of age and had complete histopathological data, forming the 'histological cohort'. Patients with at least 12 months of post-surgical follow-up were included in the subgroup 'clinical cohort'. The diagnostic efficacy of transcription factor immunohistochemistry in conjunction with hormone immunohistochemistry was compared with hormone immunohistochemistry alone. The prognostic value of identifying 'higher-risk' histological subtypes was assessed. RESULTS: There were 171 patient tumour samples analyzed in the histological cohort. Of these, there were 95 patients forming the clinical cohort. Subtype diagnosis was changed in 20/171 (12%) of tumours. Within the clinical cohort, there were 21/95 (22%) patients identified with higher-risk histological subtype tumours. These were associated with tumour invasiveness (P = 0.050), early recurrence (12-24 months, P = 0.013), shorter median time to recurrence (49 (IQR: 22.5-73.0) vs 15 (IQR: 12.0-25.0) months, P = 0.005) and reduced recurrence-free survival (P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Application of transcription factor analysis, in addition to hormone immunohistochemistry, allows for refined pituitary tumour classification and may facilitate an improved approach to prognostication.

Utility of GATA-3 Expression in the Analysis of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumour (PitNET) Transcription Factors.

With the introduction of the WHO 2017 classification of endocrine neoplasms, the use of the pituitary transcription factors PIT-1, Tpit and SF-1 has become the standard of care. However, immunohistochemistry for these transcription factors is not available in all institutions, and their reliability has been questioned. We read with interest the findings of Mete et al. that GATA-3 expression was detected in some pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNET). We therefore sort to validate this in our large cohort of PitNETs. We searched the database of Royal North Shore Hospital for PitNETs between 1998 and 2012, constructed a tissue microarray and reclassified these entities based on their expression for PIT-1, Tpit and SF-1. We then scored the expression of GATA-3 immunohistochemistry on a scale of 0-2, where 0 was no staining, 1 was patchy or weak staining and 2 was strong and diffuse staining. 265 of 346 tumours were able to be classified into a specific tumour subtype, and 263 tumours had tissue available for GATA-3 immunohistochemistry. 89% of gonadotrophs and 93% of triple-negative tumours with expression for luteinising hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone were positive for GATA-3. In the triple-negative group, GATA-3 was positive in 1 mammosomatotroph and 80% of tumours with thyroid-stimulating hormone expression. In the triple-negative hormone-negative group, 21 of 33 tumours were positive (64%). The results demonstrate that GATA-3 is a useful marker to supplement the existing pituitary transcription factors, albeit slightly less sensitive and specific than previously reported. GATA-3 may be employed in addition to the current array of immunohistochemical transcription factors, especially in the resource poor setting. However, given its potential cross-reactivity with other entities of the Sella, positive staining should be interpreted with caution and in the morphological and clinical context.

Utility of Pit-1 Immunostaining in Distinguishing Pituitary Adenomas of Primitive Differentiation from Null Cell Adenomas.

Pit-1 immunostaining is not routinely used in the characterization of pituitary adenomas, and its utility in distinguishing adenomas dedicated towards the lactotroph, somatotroph, and thyrotroph lineage from null cell adenomas warrants further evaluation. Pituitary adenomas that were negative for expression of a basic panel of hormonal markers (ACTH, prolactin, and growth hormone) were further evaluated for TSH, SF-1, and Pit-1 expression using a tissue microarray. Among the 147 identified pituitary adenomas that were negative for ACTH, prolactin, growth hormone, and TSH, expression of SF-1 was present in 68 cases (46%). Of the remaining 72 cases with sufficient tissue for further analysis, four were Pit-1 positive (6% of the adenomas negative for ACTH, prolactin, growth hormone, TSH, and SF-1); the remaining 68 were potentially null cell adenomas. Two of the Pit-1-positive adenomas displayed a paranuclear CAM 5.2 staining pattern suggestive of a sparsely granulated somatotroph adenoma; however, only one case contained fibrous bodies within a majority of the adenoma cells. Our data suggests that Pit-1 can be utilized as a second tier immunostain in cases of clinically non-functioning adenomas that are immunonegative for ACTH, prolactin, growth hormone, TSH, and SF-1 in order to further segregate rare cases of Pit-1-positive adenomas from null cell adenomas. Pit-1 immunostaining can recognize rare cases of sparsely granulated somatotroph adenomas that appear immunonegative for growth hormone, as well as rare cases of other Pit-1-positive adenomas that are negative for Pit-1 lineage hormones. Overall, pituitary adenomas of the Pit-1 lineage that do not produce prolactin, growth hormone, or TSH are rare, with only four cases identified in the current study.

Mixed Gangliocytoma-Pituitary Adenoma: Insights on the Pathogenesis of a Rare Sellar Tumor.

Gangliocytomas originating in the sellar region are rare; most are tumors composed of gangliocytic and pituitary adenomatous elements, forming the so-called mixed gangliocytoma-pituitary adenoma. The majority of mixed gangliocytoma adenomas are associated with endocrinopathies, mainly acromegaly and less often Cushing disease and hyperprolactinemia. In the present study, 10 cases of mixed gangliocytoma and somatotroph adenomas were evaluated for patterns of cellular differentiation and expression of lineage-specific transcription factors. The tumors were characterized by immunohistochemistry for pituitary hormones, cytokeratins, Pit-1, and the neuronal markers NeuN, neurofilaments (NFP), and MAP2. Double-labeling immunohistochemistry for Pit-1/GH, Pit-1/NFP, Pit-1/MAP2, and NeuN/GH was performed in 9/10 tumors. Our data demonstrate that both adenomatous and ganglionic cells express the acidophilic lineage transcription factor Pit-1. Although mixed gangliocytomas and somatotroph adenomas show histologically distinct cellular populations, there is at least a small population of cells that coexpress the Pit-1 transcription factor and neuronal-associated cytoskeletal proteins favoring the theory of transdifferentiation of neuroendocrine cells into neuronal elements of these mixed tumors.

Silent subtype 3 pituitary adenomas are not always silent and represent poorly differentiated monomorphous plurihormonal Pit-1 lineage adenomas.

Originally classified as a variant of silent corticotroph adenoma, silent subtype 3 adenomas are a distinct histologic variant of pituitary adenoma of unknown cytogenesis. We reviewed the clinical, biochemical, radiological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features of 31 silent subtype 3 adenomas to clarify their cellular origin. Among 25 with clinical and/or radiological data, all were macroadenomas; there was cavernous sinus invasion in 30% of cases and involvement of the clivus in 17% of cases. Almost 90% of patients were symptomatic; 67% had mass effect symptoms, 37% were hypogonadal and 8% had secondary adrenal insufficiency. Significant hormonal excess in 29% of cases included hyperthyroidism in 17%, acromegaly in 8% and hyperprolactinemia above 150 µg/l in 4%. Two individuals with hyperprolactinemia who were younger than 30 years had multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Immunohistochemically, all 31 tumors were diffusely positive for the pituitary lineage-specific transcription factor Pit-1. Although three only expressed Pit-1, others revealed variable positivity for one or more hormones of Pit-1 cell lineage (growth hormone, prolactin, thyroid-stimulating hormone), as well as alpha-subunit and estrogen receptor. Most tumors exhibited perinuclear reactivity for keratins with the CAM5.2 antibody; scattered fibrous bodies were noted in five (16%) tumors. The mean MIB-1 labeling index was 4% (range, 1-9%). Fourteen cases examined by electron microscopy were composed of a monomorphous population of large polygonal or elongated cells with nuclear spheridia. Sixty-five percent of patients had residual disease after surgery; after a mean follow-up of 48.4 months (median 41.5; range=2-171) disease progression was documented in 53% of those cases. These data identify silent subtype 3 adenomas as aggressive monomorphous plurihormonal adenomas of Pit-1 lineage that may be associated with hyperthyroidism, acromegaly or galactorrhea and amenorrhea. Our findings argue against the use of the nomenclature 'silent' for these tumors. To better reflect the characteristics of these tumors, we propose that they be classified as 'poorly differentiated Pit-1 lineage adenomas'.

Adipose tissue macrophages (ATM) of obese patients are releasing increased levels of prolactin during an inflammatory challenge: a role for prolactin in diabesity?

BACKGROUND: Obesity, characterized by low grade inflammation, induces adipose tissue macrophage (ATM) infiltration in white adipose tissue (AT) in both humans and rodents, thus contributing to insulin resistance. Previous studies have shown altered prolactin secretion in obesity, however, studies linking ATM infiltration and prolactin (PRL) secretion to the pathogenesis of the metabolic syndrome, obesity and diabetes are lacking. METHODS/RESULTS: In vivo, qPCR and Western blot analysis demonstrated that prolactin expression was increased in AT of obese rats and also in human AT from obese, obese pre-diabetic and obese diabetic compared to lean counterparts. Immunohistochemistry of obese rat and human AT sections demonstrated a specific expression of prolactin in macrophages. In vitro, we demonstrated that hyperglycemia and inflammation stimulated macrophages (human THP-1 cell line and sorted rat ATM) to express PRL, when challenged with different glucose concentrations with or without IL1ß. In in vivo and in vitro experiments, we assessed the expression of Pit-1 (PRL-specific transcription factor) and found that its expression was parallel to PRL expression. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we show that rodent and human macrophages synthesize prolactin in response to inflammation and high glucose concentrations. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: Our data shed new light on the potential role of macrophages in the physiopathology of diabesity via the PRL expression and on its expression mechanism and regulation.

Clinicopathological characterization of TSH-producing adenomas: special reference to TSH-immunoreactive but clinically non-functioning adenomas.

Thyrotropin (thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH))-producing pituitary adenomas have been known to be quite variable in clinical features covering from typical functioning TSH-producing adenomas (FTSHomas) associated with hyperthyroidism to clinically silent TSH cell adenomas (STAs) that are apparently unassociated with hyperthyroidism. It is important to distinguish STAs from other types of clinically non-functioning adenomas for adequate postoperative managements. However, because of rareness of TSH-producing adenomas, their histopathological features linking to the clinical manifestations have not been well characterized. Herein, we investigated clinical and histopathological findings to characterize 29 TSH-producing adenomas including 20 FTSHomas and nine STAs. Clinical symptoms of the patients with STAs included headache, visual defect, vertigo, and nausea. All STAs and 19 FTSHomas were macroadenoma. The average tumor size of STAs was significantly larger than that of FTSHomas (P < 0.05). The invasiveness was detected in 33% STAs and in 20% FTSHomas. Both STAs and FTSHomas showed a variety of morphological features and immunohistochemical profiles. Chromophobic polygonal or short-spindled tumor cells usually proliferated in a diffuse pattern, while they exhibited globoid or whorl-like appearance with intertwined cytoplasmic processes in both subgroups. Stromal fibrosis and calcification were often noted. Their nuclei were somehow pleomorphic. Ultrastructural features of all four STAs examined were similar to those of normal thyrotrophs. Thus, STAs and FTSHomas were indistinguishable by histology alone. Immunohistochemically, the number of TSH-positive cells in individual FTSHomas was highly various. Six tumors showed only a few TSH-positive cells (1-5%), and three were negative for TSH by conventional method without antigen retrieval. After proteinase K treatment, these tumors turned out TSH positive. As defined, STAs were TSH positive in more than 20% of tumor cells and three of them in more than 50%. Growth hormone- and/or prolactin-positive cells were detected in 55% STAs and 63% FTSHomas. Both pituitary-specific transcription factor 1 and GATA-binding protein 2 were expressed in all STAs and 20 FTSHomas. Membranous somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-2A immunoreactivity was found in 89% STAs and 94% FTSHomas, whereas SSTR5 was positive in 78% of both STAs and FTSHomas. MIB-1 labeling index was related to tumor invasiveness and tumor size (P < 0.05, P = 0.09, respectively). Thus, although both STAs and FTSHomas showed unique histopathological features distinct from other type adenomas, these two subgroups were indistinguishable by histopathology. Immunohistochemistry for TSH by use of antigen retrieval, transcription factors, and SSTRs may be useful to confirm STAs and to determine the postoperative therapy among various kinds of clinically non-functioning adenomas.