RESUMEN
We assessed tecovirimat treatment equity for 3,740 mpox patients in New York, New York, USA, during the 2022 mpox emergency; 32.4% received tecovirimat. Treatment rates by race/ethnicity were 38.8% (White), 31.3% (Black/African American), 31.0% (Hispanic/Latino), and 30.1% (Asian/Pacific Islander/other). Future public health emergency responses must prioritize institutional and structural racism mitigation.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales , Mpox , Humanos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Mpox/epidemiología , Mpox/etnología , Mpox/terapia , New York/epidemiología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Factores Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Blanco/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Asiático Americano Nativo Hawáiano y de las Islas del Pacífico/estadística & datos numéricos , Antivirales/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The Transitions of Stroke Care Disparities Study (TCSD-S) is an observational study designed to determine race-ethnic and sex disparities in post-hospital discharge transitions of stroke care and stroke outcomes and to develop hospital-level initiatives to reduce these disparities to improve stroke outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Here, we present the study rationale, describe the methodology, report preliminary outcomes, and discuss a critical need for the development, implementation, and dissemination of interventions for successful post-hospital transition of stroke care. The preliminary outcomes describe the demographic, stroke risk factor, socioeconomic, and acute care characteristics of eligible participants by race-ethnicity and sex. We also report on all-cause and vascular-related death, readmissions, and hospital/emergency room representations at 30- and 90-days after hospital discharge. RESULTS: The preliminary sample included data from 1048 ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage discharged from 10 comprehensive stroke centers across the state of Florida. The overall sample was 45% female, 22% Non-Hispanic Black and 21% Hispanic participants, with an average age of 64 ± 14 years. All cause death, readmissions, or hospital/emergency room representations are 10% and 19% at 30 and 90 days, respectively. One in 5 outcomes was vascular-related. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the transition from stroke hospitalization as an area in need for considerable improvement in systems of care for stroke patients discharged from hospital. Results from our preliminary analysis highlight the importance of investigating race-ethnic and sex differences in post-stroke outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Cuidado de Transición , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Población Negra/estadística & datos numéricos , Etnicidad , Florida/epidemiología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Sexuales , Accidente Cerebrovascular/clasificación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etnología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Cuidado de Transición/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Racial disparities in school discipline may have collateral consequences on the larger non-suspended student population. The present study leveraged two longitudinal datasets with 1201 non-suspended adolescents (48% Black, 52% White; 55% females, 45% males; Mage : 12-13) enrolled in 84 classrooms in an urban mid-Atlantic city of the United States during the 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 academic years. Classmates' minor infraction suspensions predicted greater next year's defiant infractions among non-suspended Black adolescents, and this longitudinal relation was worse for Black youth enrolled in predominantly Black classrooms. For White youth, classmates' minor infraction suspensions predicted greater defiant infractions specifically when they were enrolled in predominantly non-White classrooms. Racial inequities in school discipline may have repercussions that disadvantage all adolescents regardless of race.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Castigo , Racismo , Instituciones Académicas , Estudiantes , Blanco , Adolescente , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Instituciones Académicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes/psicología , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Blanco/psicología , Blanco/estadística & datos numéricos , Castigo/psicología , Factores Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Mid-Atlantic Region/epidemiología , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Racismo/etnología , Racismo/psicología , Racismo/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Compared with White patients, Black and American Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN) patients experience higher rates of kidney cancer incidence, and Black, AI/AN, and Hispanic patients face later stages of disease at diagnosis, poorer survival rates, and greater risk of mortality. Despite the importance that appropriate treatment has in ensuring positive outcomes, little is known about the association between race and ethnicity and receipt of treatment for kidney cancer. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to explore differences in receipt of treatment and patterns of refusal of recommended treatment by race and ethnicity. DESIGN: 96,745 patients ages 45-84 with kidney cancer were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program between 2007 and 2014. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association of race and ethnicity with treatment and with patient refusal of recommended treatment. Outcomes of interest were (1) receiving any surgical procedure, and (2) refusing recommended surgery. RESULTS: Relative to White patients, Black and AI/AN patients had lower odds of undergoing any surgical procedure (OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.72-0.81; p < 0.001, and OR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.76-1.10; p = 0.36, respectively) after adjusting for gender, age, insurance status, stage at diagnosis, unemployment status, education status, and income as additive effects. Black and AI/AN patients also had higher odds of refusing recommended surgery (OR = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.56-2.39; p < 0.001, and OR = 1.99; 95% CI: 1.05-3.76; p = 0.035, respectively). Hispanic patients had slightly higher odds of undergoing any surgical procedure (OR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.04-1.17; p = 0.001) and lower odds of refusal (OR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.50-0.90; p = 0.007, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with White patients, Black patients were less likely to receive potentially life-saving surgery, and both Black and AI/AN patients were more likely to refuse recommended surgery.
Asunto(s)
Etnicidad , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Neoplasias Renales , Factores Raciales , Humanos , Pueblo Asiatico/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Renales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Renales/etnología , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Grupos Raciales/etnología , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Programa de VERF/estadística & datos numéricos , Blanco , Indio Americano o Nativo de Alaska , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
O estado nutricional gestacional adequado constitui-se como elemento essencial para a saúde materna e fetal. Este estudo teve como objetivo identificar a associação entre determinantes sociais, quesito raça/cor e estado nutricional, em gestantes do Recôncavo da Bahia, Brasil. Trata-se de um estudo ecológico, com dados extraídos do Sistema de Vigilância Alimentar e Nutricional no ano de 2020, referente ao estado nutricional de gestantes adultas e adolescentes dos 19 municípios do Recôncavo da Bahia. Foi utilizada a regressão quantílica para a análise do desfecho do estado nutricional de gestantes, variável exposição principal, raça/cor autorreferida e covariáveis Coeficiente de Gini (CG) e Índice de Desenvolvimento Humano (IDHM). Foram acompanhadas 4.061 gestantes (14,35% eram adolescentes) com predominância daquelas que se autodeclararam pretas ou pardas (62,34%). Houve prevalência de excesso de peso em 53,36% das gestantes. Identificou-se associação positiva do excesso de peso com a raça/cor preta ou parda e inversamente ao CG. Este estudo revelou que o estado nutricional de gestantes é influenciado pela raça/cor preta e/ou parda e pelo CG. Tais resultados podem contribuir para o planejamento de programas e/ou projetos que incluam ações de alimentação e nutrição e visam o acompanhamento nutricional de gestantes, principalmente dos grupos socialmente vulnerabilizados.
Adequate gestational nutritional status is an essential element for maternal and fetal health. The objective of this study was to identify the association between social determinants, race/color and nutritional status in pregnant women from Recôncavo da Bahia, Brazil. This ecological study, utilized data extracted from the 2020 Food and Nutrition Surveillance System, focusing on the nutritional status of adults and adolescents pregnant women across the 19 municipalities in the Recôncavo da Bahia. Quantile Regression was employed to analyze the nutritional status of pregnant women, considering the main exposure variable as self-reported race/color and covariates such as the Gini Coefficient and Human Development Index. In 2020, a total of 4,061 pregnant women were followed, with 14.35% being adolescents. The majority of pregnant women self-identified as black or brown (62.34%). The prevalence of overweight among pregnant women was 53.36%. The analysis revealed a positive association between overweight and black or brown race/color, while an inverse association was observed with the Gini Coefficient. These findings have implications for planning programs and projects that encompass food and nutrition interventions aimed at monitoring and improving the nutritional status of pregnant women, particularly those belonging to socially vulnerable groups.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Encuesta Socioeconómica , Sistema de Vigilancia Sanitaria , Factores Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Inseguridad Alimentaria , BrasilRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Reported breast cancer screening among American Indian women is consistently below that of White women. The last claims-based trends were from 1991 to 2001. This study updates mammography trends for American Indian women and examines the impact of race, urbanicity, and income on long-term mammography use. METHODS: This was a multi-year (2005-2019), retrospective study of women aged 40-89 years using a 5% sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries residing in Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Washington. This study used multivariable logistic regression to examine the impact of urbanicity and income on receiving mammography for American Indian women compared with that for White women. Analyses were conducted in 2022. RESULTS: Overall, annual age-adjusted mammography use declined from 205 per 1,000 in 2005 to 165 per 1,000 in 2019. The slope of these declines was significantly steeper (difference = -2.41, p<0.001) for White women (-3.06) than for American Indian women (-0.65). Mammography-use odds across all urbanicity categories were less for American Indian women than for White women compared with those of their respective metropolitan counterparts (e.g., rural: 0.96, 95% CI=0.77, 1.20 for American Indian women and 1.47, 99% CI=1.39, 1.57 for White women). Although residing in higher-income communities was not associated with mammography use for American Indian women, it was 31% higher for White women (OR=1.31, 99% CI=1.28, 1.34). CONCLUSIONS: The disparity in annual age-adjusted mammography use between American Indian and White women narrowed between 2005 and 2019. However, the association of urbanicity and community income on mammography use differs substantially between American Indian and White women. Policies to reduce disparities need to consider these differences.
Asunto(s)
Indio Americano o Nativo de Alaska , Neoplasias de la Mama , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Mamografía , Blanco , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Indio Americano o Nativo de Alaska/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Mamografía/economía , Mamografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Mamografía/tendencias , Medicare , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Raciales/economía , Factores Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Raciales/tendencias , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Blanco/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
This cross-sectional study examines the national- and state-level age-adjusted mortality rates for alcohol-associated liver disease in 4 racial groups, with a focus on the American Indian or Alaska Native population.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Alcohol , COVID-19 , Hepatopatías , Grupos Raciales , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Etanol/efectos adversos , Indígenas Norteamericanos , Hepatopatías/epidemiología , Hepatopatías/etnología , Hepatopatías/etiología , Hepatopatías/mortalidad , Pandemias , Trastornos Relacionados con Alcohol/complicaciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Alcohol/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Alcohol/etnología , Trastornos Relacionados con Alcohol/mortalidad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Factores Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales/etnología , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality across U.S. racial/ethnic groups. Existing studies often focus on a particular race/ethnicity or single domain within the care continuum. Granular exploration of disparities among different racial/ethnic groups across the entire colon cancer care continuum is needed. We aimed to characterize differences in colon cancer outcomes by race/ethnicity across each stage of the care continuum. METHODS: We used the 2010-2017 National Cancer Database to examine differences in outcomes by race/ethnicity across six domains: clinical stage at presentation; timing of surgery; access to minimally invasive surgery; post-operative outcomes; utilization of chemotherapy; and cumulative incidence of death. Analysis was via multivariable logistic or median regression, with select demographics, hospital factors, and treatment details as covariates. RESULTS: 326,003 patients (49.6% female, 24.0% non-White, including 12.7% Black, 6.1% Hispanic/Spanish, 1.3% East Asian, 0.9% Southeast Asian, 0.4% South Asian, 0.3% AIAE, and 0.2% NHOPI) met inclusion criteria. Relative to non-Hispanic White patients: Southeast Asian (OR 1.39, p < 0.01), Hispanic/Spanish (OR 1.11 p < 0.01), and Black (OR 1.09, p < 0.01) patients had increased odds of presenting with advanced clinical stage. Southeast Asian (OR 1.37, p < 0.01), East Asian (OR 1.27, p = 0.05), Hispanic/Spanish (OR 1.05 p = 0.02), and Black (OR 1.05, p < 0.01) patients had increased odds of advanced pathologic stage. Black patients had increased odds of experiencing a surgical delay (OR 1.33, p < 0.01); receiving non-robotic surgery (OR 1.12, p < 0.01); having post-surgical complications (OR 1.29, p < 0.01); initiating chemotherapy more than 90 days post-surgery (OR 1.24, p < 0.01); and omitting chemotherapy altogether (OR 1.12, p = 0.05). Black patients had significantly higher cumulative incidence of death at every pathologic stage relative to non-Hispanic White patients when adjusting for non-modifiable patient factors (p < 0.05, all stages), but these differences were no longer statistically significant when also adjusting for modifiable factors such as insurance status and income. CONCLUSIONS: Non-White patients disproportionately experience advanced stage at presentation. Disparities for Black patients are seen across the entire colon cancer care continuum. Targeted interventions may be appropriate for some groups; however, major system-level transformation is needed to address disparities experienced by Black patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Etnicidad , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Grupos Raciales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Colon/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Colon/etnología , Neoplasias del Colon/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Colon/terapia , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/normas , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Factores Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pueblos del Este de Asia/estadística & datos numéricos , Pueblos del Sudeste Asiático/estadística & datos numéricos , Personas del Sur de Asia/estadística & datos numéricos , Nativos de Hawái y Otras Islas del Pacífico/estadística & datos numéricos , Asiático/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Indio Americano o Nativo de Alaska/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A racial compensation disparity among physicians across numerous specialties is well documented and persists after adjustment for age, sex, experience, work hours, productivity, academic rank, and practice structure. This study examined national survey data to determine whether there are racial differences in compensation among anesthesiologists in the United States. METHODS: In 2018, 28,812 active members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists were surveyed to examine compensation among members. Compensation was defined as the amount reported as direct compensation on a W-2, 1099, or K-1, plus all voluntary salary reductions (eg, 401[k], health insurance). Covariates potentially associated with compensation were identified (eg, sex and academic rank) and included in regression models. Racial differences in outcome and model variables were assessed via Wilcoxon rank sum tests and Pearson's χ 2 tests. Covariate adjusted ordinal logistic regression estimated an odds ratio (OR) for the relationship between race and ethnicity and compensation while adjusting for provider and practice characteristics. RESULTS: The final analytical sample consisted of 1952 anesthesiologists (78% non-Hispanic White). The analytic sample represented a higher percentage of White, female, and younger physicians compared to the demographic makeup of anesthesiologists in the United States. When comparing non-Hispanic White anesthesiologists with anesthesiologists from other racial and ethnic minority groups, (ie, American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian, Black, Hispanic, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander), the dependent variable (compensation range) and 6 of the covariates (sex, age, spousal work status, region, practice type, and completed fellowship) had significant differences. In the adjusted model, anesthesiologists from racial and ethnic minority populations had 26% lower odds of being in a higher compensation range compared to White anesthesiologists (OR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Compensation for anesthesiologists showed a significant pay disparity associated with race and ethnicity even after adjusting for provider and practice characteristics. Our study raises concerns that processes, policies, or biases (either implicit or explicit) persist and may impact compensation for anesthesiologists from racial and ethnic minority populations. This disparity in compensation requires actionable solutions and calls for future studies that investigate contributing factors and to validate our findings given the low response rate.
Asunto(s)
Anestesiólogos , Anestesiología , Etnicidad , Grupos Minoritarios , Salarios y Beneficios , Femenino , Humanos , Asiático , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Salarios y Beneficios/economía , Salarios y Beneficios/estadística & datos numéricos , Anestesiología/economía , Anestesiología/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Raciales/economía , Factores Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano , Blanco , Indio Americano o Nativo de Alaska , Nativos de Hawái y Otras Islas del PacíficoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Black Americans are exposed to higher annual levels of air pollution containing fine particulate matter (particles with an aerodynamic diameter of ≤2.5 µm [PM2.5]) than White Americans and may be more susceptible to its health effects. Low-income Americans may also be more susceptible to PM2.5 pollution than high-income Americans. Because information is lacking on exposure-response curves for PM2.5 exposure and mortality among marginalized subpopulations categorized according to both race and socioeconomic position, the Environmental Protection Agency lacks important evidence to inform its regulatory rulemaking for PM2.5 standards. METHODS: We analyzed 623 million person-years of Medicare data from 73 million persons 65 years of age or older from 2000 through 2016 to estimate associations between annual PM2.5 exposure and mortality in subpopulations defined simultaneously by racial identity (Black vs. White) and income level (Medicaid eligible vs. ineligible). RESULTS: Lower PM2.5 exposure was associated with lower mortality in the full population, but marginalized subpopulations appeared to benefit more as PM2.5 levels decreased. For example, the hazard ratio associated with decreasing PM2.5 from 12 µg per cubic meter to 8 µg per cubic meter for the White higher-income subpopulation was 0.963 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.955 to 0.970), whereas equivalent hazard ratios for marginalized subpopulations were lower: 0.931 (95% CI, 0.909 to 0.953) for the Black higher-income subpopulation, 0.940 (95% CI, 0.931 to 0.948) for the White low-income subpopulation, and 0.939 (95% CI, 0.921 to 0.957) for the Black low-income subpopulation. CONCLUSIONS: Higher-income Black persons, low-income White persons, and low-income Black persons may benefit more from lower PM2.5 levels than higher-income White persons. These findings underscore the importance of considering racial identity and income together when assessing health inequities. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.).
Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Inequidades en Salud , Material Particulado , Grupos Raciales , Factores Socioeconómicos , Anciano , Humanos , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/efectos adversos , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Contaminación del Aire/efectos adversos , Contaminación del Aire/análisis , Contaminación del Aire/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades/economía , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades/epidemiología , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades/etnología , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades/mortalidad , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Material Particulado/efectos adversos , Material Particulado/análisis , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Clase Social , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Blanco/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Given the national attention to disparities in health care, understanding variation provided to minorities becomes increasingly important. This study will examine the effect of race on the rate and cost of unplanned hospitalizations after breast reconstruction procedures. METHODS: The authors performed an analysis comparing patients undergoing implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. The authors evaluated the rate of unplanned hospitalizations and associated expenditures among patients of different races. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine the association among race and readmissions and health care expenditures. RESULTS: The cohort included 17,042 patients. The rate of an unplanned visit was 5%. The rates of readmissions among black patients (6%) and Hispanic patients (7%) in this study are higher compared with white patients (5%). However, after controlling for patient-level characteristics, race was not an independent predictor of an unplanned visit. In our expenditure model, black patients [adjusted cost ratio, 1.35 (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.66)] and Hispanic patients [adjusted cost ratio, 1.34 (95% CI, 1.08 to 1.65)] experienced greater cost for their readmission compared with white patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although race is not an independent predictor of an unplanned hospital visit after surgery, racial minorities bear a higher cost burden after controlling for insurance status, further stimulating health care disparities. Adjusted payment models may be a strategy to reduce disparities in surgical care. In addition, direct and indirect measures of disparities should be used when examining health care disparities to identify consequences of inequities more robustly.
Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Hospitalización , Mamoplastia , Grupos Minoritarios , Readmisión del Paciente , Humanos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos , Mamoplastia/economía , Mamoplastia/métodos , Mamoplastia/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Minoritarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Raciales/economía , Factores Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Blanco/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Prior efforts to characterize disparities in radiation therapy access and receipt have not comprehensively investigated interplay between race, socioeconomic status, and geography relative to oncologic outcomes. This study sought to define these complex relationships at the US county level for prostate cancer (PC) and invasive breast (BC) cancer to build a tool that facilitates identification of "radiotherapy deserts"-regions with mismatch between radiation therapy resources and oncologic need. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An ecologic study model was constructed using national databases to evaluate 3,141 US counties. Radiation therapy resources and use densities were operationalized as physicians to persons at risk (PPR) and use to persons at risk (UPR): the number of attending radiation oncologists and Medicare beneficiaries per 100,000 persons at risk, respectively. Oncologic need was defined by "hot zone" counties with ≥2 standard deviations (SDs) above mean incidence and death rates. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions examined links between PPR and UPR densities, epidemiologic variables, and hot zones for oncologic outcomes. Statistics are reported at a significance level of P < .05. RESULTS: The mean (SD) PPR and UPR densities were 2.1 (5.9) and 192.6 (557.6) for PC and 1.9 (5.3) and 174.4 (501.0) for BC, respectively. Counties with high PPR and UPR densities were predominately metropolitan (odds ratio [OR], 2.9-4.4), generally with a higher percentage of Black non-Hispanic constituents (OR, 1.5-2.3). Incidence and death rate hot zones were largely nonmetropolitan (OR, 0.3-0.6), generally with a higher percentage of Black non-Hispanic constituents (OR, 3.2-6.3). Lower PPR density was associated with death rate hot zones for both types of cancer (OR, 0.8-0.9); UPR density was generally not linked to oncologic outcomes on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The study found that mismatch between oncologic need with PPR and UPR disproportionately affects nonmetropolitan communities with a higher percentage of Black non-Hispanic constituents. An interactive web platform (bit.ly/densitymaps) was developed to visualize "radiotherapy deserts" and drive targeted investigation of underlying barriers to care in areas of highest need, with the goal of reducing health inequities in this context.
Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Neoplasias , Radioterapia , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/economía , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/etnología , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Clase Social , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Radioterapia/economía , Radioterapia/normas , Radioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Configuración de Recursos Limitados/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/economía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/etnología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etnología , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Femenino , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Importance: Stroke is the fifth-highest cause of death in the US and a leading cause of serious long-term disability with particularly high risk in Black individuals. Quality risk prediction algorithms, free of bias, are key for comprehensive prevention strategies. Objective: To compare the performance of stroke-specific algorithms with pooled cohort equations developed for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease for the prediction of new-onset stroke across different subgroups (race, sex, and age) and to determine the added value of novel machine learning techniques. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study on combined and harmonized data from Black and White participants of the Framingham Offspring, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC), Multi-Ethnic Study for Atherosclerosis (MESA), and Reasons for Geographical and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) studies (1983-2019) conducted in the US. The 62â¯482 participants included at baseline were at least 45 years of age and free of stroke or transient ischemic attack. Exposures: Published stroke-specific algorithms from Framingham and REGARDS (based on self-reported risk factors) as well as pooled cohort equations for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease plus 2 newly developed machine learning algorithms. Main Outcomes and Measures: Models were designed to estimate the 10-year risk of new-onset stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic). Discrimination concordance index (C index) and calibration ratios of expected vs observed event rates were assessed at 10 years. Analyses were conducted by race, sex, and age groups. Results: The combined study sample included 62â¯482 participants (median age, 61 years, 54% women, and 29% Black individuals). Discrimination C indexes were not significantly different for the 2 stroke-specific models (Framingham stroke, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.72-073; REGARDS self-report, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.72-0.74) vs the pooled cohort equations (0.72; 95% CI, 0.71-0.73): differences 0.01 or less (P values >.05) in the combined sample. Significant differences in discrimination were observed by race: the C indexes were 0.76 for all 3 models in White vs 0.69 in Black women (all P values <.001) and between 0.71 and 0.72 in White men and between 0.64 and 0.66 in Black men (all P values ≤.001). When stratified by age, model discrimination was better for younger (<60 years) vs older (≥60 years) adults for both Black and White individuals. The ratios of observed to expected 10-year stroke rates were closest to 1 for the REGARDS self-report model (1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.09) and indicated risk overestimation for Framingham stroke (0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.89) and pooled cohort equations (0.74; 95% CI, 0.71-0.77). Performance did not significantly improve when novel machine learning algorithms were applied. Conclusions and Relevance: In this analysis of Black and White individuals without stroke or transient ischemic attack among 4 US cohorts, existing stroke-specific risk prediction models and novel machine learning techniques did not significantly improve discriminative accuracy for new-onset stroke compared with the pooled cohort equations, and the REGARDS self-report model had the best calibration. All algorithms exhibited worse discrimination in Black individuals than in White individuals, indicating the need to expand the pool of risk factors and improve modeling techniques to address observed racial disparities and improve model performance.
Asunto(s)
Población Negra , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Prejuicio , Medición de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Población Blanca , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aterosclerosis/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etnología , Medición de Riesgo/normas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Edad , Factores Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Negra/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Aprendizaje Automático/normas , Sesgo , Prejuicio/prevención & control , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/normas , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Simulación por Computador/normas , Simulación por Computador/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Black women often experience poorer breast cancer-related outcomes and higher mortality than white women. A contributor to this disparity may relate to the disproportionate burden of cancer treatment-related cardiovascular (CV) toxicities. The objective of this review is to identify studies that report racial differences in CV toxicity risk. METHODS: Medline and Embase were searched for studies that assessed CV toxicities as the outcome(s) and included Black and White women with breast cancer. Studies were selected based on inclusion/exclusion criteria and through the use of multiple reviewers. RESULTS: The review included 13 studies following a review of 409 citations and 49 full-text articles. All studies were retrospective and 8/13 utilized data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database. Trastuzumab was the most frequently studied treatment. The proportion of Black women in these studies ranged from 5.5 to 63%. A majority of studies reported a higher risk of CV toxicity amongst Black women when compared to white women (93%). Black women had up to a two times higher risk of CV toxicity (HR, 2.73 (CI, 1.24 to 6.01)) compared to white women. Only one study evaluated the role of socioeconomic factors in explaining racial differences in CV toxicity; however, the disparity remained even after adjusting for these factors. CONCLUSIONS: There is a critical need for more longitudinal studies that evaluate multilevel factors (e.g., psychosocial, biological) that may help to explain this disparity. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Black cancer survivors may require additional surveillance and mitigation strategies to decrease disproportionate burden of CV toxicities.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias de la Mama , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Negro o Afroamericano , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etnología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Blanco , Factores Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etnología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Differences in the incidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provided by bystanders contribute to survival disparities among persons with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. It is critical to understand whether the incidence of bystander CPR in witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests at home and in public settings differs according to the race or ethnic group of the person with cardiac arrest in order to inform interventions. METHODS: Within a large U.S. registry, we identified 110,054 witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests during the period from 2013 through 2019. We used a hierarchical logistic regression model to analyze the incidence of bystander CPR in Black or Hispanic persons as compared with White persons with witnessed cardiac arrests at home and in public locations. We analyzed the overall incidence as well as the incidence according to neighborhood racial or ethnic makeup and income strata. Neighborhoods were classified as predominantly White (>80% of residents), majority Black or Hispanic (>50% of residents), or integrated, and as high income (an annual median household income of >$80,000), middle income ($40,000-$80,000), or low income (<$40,000). RESULTS: Overall, 35,469 of the witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (32.2%) occurred in Black or Hispanic persons. Black and Hispanic persons were less likely to receive bystander CPR at home (38.5%) than White persons (47.4%) (adjusted odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 0.76) and less likely to receive bystander CPR in public locations than White persons (45.6% vs. 60.0%) (adjusted odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.66). The incidence of bystander CPR among Black and Hispanic persons was less than that among White persons not only in predominantly White neighborhoods at home (adjusted odds ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.90) and in public locations (adjusted odds ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.75) but also in majority Black or Hispanic neighborhoods at home (adjusted odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.83) and in public locations (adjusted odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.68) and in integrated neighborhoods at home (adjusted odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.81) and in public locations (adjusted odds ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.77). Similarly, across all neighborhood income strata, the frequency of bystander CPR at home and in public locations was lower among Black and Hispanic persons with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest than among White persons. CONCLUSIONS: In witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, Black and Hispanic persons were less likely than White persons to receive potentially lifesaving bystander CPR at home and in public locations, regardless of the racial or ethnic makeup or income level of the neighborhood where the cardiac arrest occurred. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.).
Asunto(s)
Población Negra , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Hispánicos o Latinos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Población Blanca , Humanos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/epidemiología , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/etnología , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Características de la Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Negra/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite growing evidence suggesting racial or ethnic disparities in the risk of severe maternal morbidity among live births, there is little research investigating potential differences in severe maternal morbidity risk among stillbirths across race and ethnicity. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the risk of severe maternal morbidity by race and ethnicity among patients with singleton stillbirth pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: We used the California Linked Birth File database to perform a retrospective analysis of singleton stillbirth pregnancies delivered at 20 to 42 weeks' gestation between 2007 and 2011. The database contained information from fetal death certificates linked to maternal hospital discharge records. We defined severe maternal morbidity using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention composite severe maternal morbidity indicator and compared rates of severe maternal morbidity across racial and ethnic groups. Multivariable regression analysis was used to examine how race and ethnicity were associated with severe maternal morbidity risk after accounting for the influence of patients' clinical risk factors, socioeconomic characteristics, and attributes of the delivery hospital. RESULTS: Of the 9198 patients with singleton stillbirths, 533 (5.8%) experienced severe maternal morbidity. Non-Hispanic Black patients had a significantly higher risk of severe maternal morbidity (10.6% vs 5.2% in non-Hispanic White patients, 5.2% in Hispanic patients, and 5.1% in patients with other race or ethnicity; P<.001). The higher risk of severe maternal morbidity among non-Hispanic Black patients persisted even after adjusting for patients' clinical, socioeconomic, and hospital characteristics (adjusted odds ratio for non-Hispanic Black vs non-Hispanic White patients, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.50). Further analysis separating blood-transfusion and nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity showed a higher risk of blood transfusion in non-Hispanic Black patients, which remained significant after adjusting for patients' clinical, socioeconomic, and hospital characteristics (adjusted odds ratio for non-Hispanic Black vs non-Hispanic White patients, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-2.43). However, the higher risk of nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity in non-Hispanic Black patients was no longer significant after adjusting for patients' clinical risk factors (adjusted odds ratio for non-Hispanic Black vs non-Hispanic White patients, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-2.30). CONCLUSION: Severe maternal morbidity occurred in 5.8% of patients with a singleton stillbirth. Risk of severe maternal morbidity in stillbirth was higher in patients with non-Hispanic Black race, which was likely owing to a higher risk of hemorrhage, as evidenced by increased rate of blood transfusion.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Mortinato , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mortinato/epidemiología , Mortinato/etnología , Blanco/estadística & datos numéricos , Riesgo , California/epidemiología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Breast cancer is commonly diagnosed among women, accounting for approximately 30% of all cancer cases reported among women.* A slight annual increase in breast cancer incidence occurred in the United States during 2013-2017 (1). To examine trends in breast cancer incidence among women aged ≥20 years by race/ethnicity and age, CDC analyzed data from U.S. Cancer Statistics (USCS) during 1999-2018. Overall, breast cancer incidence rates among women decreased an average of 0.3% per year, decreasing 2.1% per year during 1999-2004 and increasing 0.3% per year during 2004-2018. Incidence increased among non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander women and women aged 20-39 years and decreased among non-Hispanic White women and women aged 50-64 and ≥75 years. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force currently recommends biennial screening mammography for women aged 50-74 years (2). These findings suggest that women aged 20-49 years might benefit from discussing potential breast cancer risk and ways to reduce risk with their health care providers. Further examination of breast cancer trends by demographic characteristics might help tailor breast cancer prevention and control programs to address state- or county-level incidence rates and help prevent health disparities.
Asunto(s)
Distribución por Edad , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Programa de VERF , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Objetivo: descrever os anos potenciais de vida perdidos (APVPs) por aids na população do sexo feminino e analisar sua associação com raça/cor da pele e indicadores de vulnerabilidade social em Porto Alegre/RS, Brasil. Métodos: estudo descritivo, considerando-se os óbitos do sexo feminino por aids em 2007-2017; os dados foram obtidos no banco do Sistema de Informações sobre Mortalidade; foram calculados valores brutos e taxas de APVPs por 1 mil óbitos, considerando-se os distritos sanitários e a raça/cor da pele. Resultados: entre 1.539 óbitos, foram estimados cerca de 51 mil anos potenciais de vida, representando 86,5 anos perdidos/1 mil pessoas do sexo feminino; identificou-se maior proporção de óbitos naquelas de raça/cor da pele branca (53,4%); porém, maior taxa de APVPs ocorreu para as de raça/cor da pele preta/parda residentes em regiões de maior vulnerabilidade. Conclusão: os resultados sugerem o impacto de desigualdades raciais na diminuição dos anos potenciais de vida, em função do óbito por aids.
Objetivo: describir los años potenciales de vida perdidos (APVP) por SIDA en la población femenina y analizar la asociación con raza/color e indicadores de vulnerabilidad social en Porto Alegre/RS, Brasil. Métodos: estudio descriptivo considerando muertes por SIDA en el sexo femenino entre 2007 y 2017; los datos se obtuvieron de la base de datos del sistema de información de mortalidad; los valores brutos y las tasas de APVP por cada 1 mil muertes se calcularon considerando los distritos de salud y la raza/color de piel. Resultados: entre 1.539 muertes, se perdieron 51.000 años potenciales de vida, lo que representa 86,5 años perdidos por cada 1 mil personas del sexo femenino; se identificó una mayor proporción de muertes para la raza blanca/color de piel (53,4%), pero una mayor tasa de APVP entre las negras que viven en regiones de mayor vulnerabilidad. Conclusión: los resultados sugieren el impacto de las desigualdades raciales en la reducción de los años potenciales de vida, por muerte por SIDA.
Objective: to describe the years of potential life lost (YPLL) due to AIDS among the female population and analyze its association with race/skin color and social vulnerability indicators in Porto Alegre, capital city of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Methods: this was a descriptive study that took into consideration AIDS deaths in female between 2007 and 2017; data were obtained from the Mortality Information System; crude values and YPLL rates per 1,000 deaths were calculated, taking into consideration health districts and race/skin color. Results: of the 1,539 deaths, approximately 51,000 years of potential life were estimated, representing 86.5 years lost/1,000 female; it could be seen a higher proportion of deaths among female of White race/ skin color (53.4%); however, a higher rate of YPLL was found among female of Black and mixed race/skin color living in regions of greater vulnerability. Conclusion: the results suggest the impact of racial inequalities on the decrease in years of potential life due to AIDS deaths.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Esperanza de Vida/tendencias , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/mortalidad , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/epidemiología , Factores Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Brasil/epidemiología , Factores Sexuales , Epidemiología Descriptiva , Salud de la MujerRESUMEN
We combined survey, mobility, and infections data in greater Boston, MA to simulate the effects of racial disparities in the inclination to become vaccinated on continued infection rates and the attainment of herd immunity. The simulation projected marked inequities, with communities of color experiencing infection rates 3 times higher than predominantly White communities and reaching herd immunity 45 days later on average. Persuasion of individuals uncertain about vaccination was crucial to preventing the worst inequities but could only narrow them so far because 1/5th of Black and Latinx individuals said that they would never vaccinate. The results point to a need for well-crafted, compassionate messaging that reaches out to those most resistant to the vaccine.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Intención , Factores Raciales , Vacunación , Boston/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Comunicación Persuasiva , Factores Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Factores Socioeconómicos , Incertidumbre , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Importance: Women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) may develop a subsequent invasive second breast cancer (SBC). Understanding the association of racial and ethnic factors with the development of invasive SBC may help reduce overtreatment and undertreatment of women from minority groups. Objective: To evaluate risk factors associated with developing invasive ipsilateral SBC (iiSBC) and invasive contralateral SBC (icSBC) among women with an initial diagnosis of DCIS who are from racial and ethnic minority populations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used deidentified data from the Hawai'i Tumor Registry of 6221 female Hawai'i residents aged 20 years or older who received a diagnosis of DCIS between January 1, 1973, and December 31, 2017. The 5 most populous ethnic groups were compared (Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Native Hawaiian, and White). Data analysis was performed from 2020 to 2021. Exposures: Patient demographic and clinical characteristics and the first course of treatment. Main Outcome and Measures: The a priori study outcome was the development of invasive SBC. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with invasive SBC. Factors that were significant on unadjusted analyses were included in the adjusted models (ie, age, race and ethnicity, diagnosis year, DCIS histologic characteristics, laterality, hormone status, and treatment). Results: The racial and ethnic distribution of patients with DCIS across the state's most populous groups were 2270 Japanese women (37%), 1411 White women (23%), 840 Filipino women (14%), 821 Native Hawaiian women (13%), and 491 Chinese women (8%). Women of other minority race and ethnicity collectively comprised 6% of cases (n = 388). A total of 6221 women (age range, 20 to ≥80 years) were included in the study; 4817 (77%) were 50 years of age or older, 4452 (72%) received a diagnosis between 2000 and 2017, 2581 (42%) had well or moderately differentiated histologic characteristics, 2383 (38%) had noninfiltrating intraductal DCIS, and 2011 (32%) were treated with mastectomy only. Of these 6221 women, 444 (7%) developed invasive SBC; 190 developed iiSBC (median time to SBC diagnosis, 7.8 years [range, 0.5-30 years]) and 254 developed icSBC (median time to SBC diagnosis, 5.9 years [range, 0.5-28.8 years]). On adjusted analysis, women who developed iiSBC were more likely to be younger than 50 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.08-2.06), Native Hawaiian (aOR, 3.28; 95% CI, 2.01-5.35), Filipino (aOR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.11-3.42), Japanese (aOR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.01-2.48), and untreated (aOR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.09-4.80). Compared with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) alone, there was a decreased likelihood of iiSBC among women receiving BCS and radiotherapy (aOR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.27-0.75), BCS and systemic treatment with or without radiotherapy (aOR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23-0.69), mastectomy only (aOR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.13-0.39), and mastectomy and systemic treatment (aOR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-0.96). Women who developed an icSBC were more likely to be Native Hawaiian (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.10-2.61) or Filipino (aOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.10-2.63). Risk of both iiSBC and icSBC decreased in the later years of diagnosis (2000-2017) compared with the earlier years (1973-1999). Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that Native Hawaiian and Filipino women who initially received a diagnosis of DCIS were more likely to subsequently develop both iiSBC and icSBC. Japanese women and younger women were more likely to develop iiSBC. Subpopulation disaggregation may help guide clinical treatment and screening decisions for at-risk subpopulations.