Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 92
Filtrar
1.
Blood Rev ; 45: 100690, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32273121

RESUMEN

Exposure to acute, high-dose, high dose-rate whole-body ionizing radiations damages the bone marrow resulting in rapid decreases in concentrations of blood cells, especially lymphocytes, granulocytes and platelets with associated risks of infection and bleeding. In several experimental models including non-human primate radiation exposure models giving molecularly cloned haematopoietic growth factor including granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (G/M-CSF; sargramostim) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim and pegylated G-CSF [peg-filgrastim]) accelerates bone marrow recovery and increases survival. Based on these data these molecules are US FDA approved for treating victims of radiation and nuclear incidents, accident and events such as nuclear terrorism and are included in the US National Strategic Stockpile. We discuss the immediate medical response to these events including how to estimate radiation dose and uniformity and which interventions are appropriate in different radiation exposures settings. We also discuss similarities and differences between molecularly cloned haematopoietic growth factors.


Asunto(s)
Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/administración & dosificación , Dosis de Radiación , Radiación Ionizante , Proteínas Recombinantes/administración & dosificación , Irradiación Corporal Total/efectos adversos , Médula Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Médula Ósea/efectos de la radiación , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Hematopoyesis/efectos de los fármacos , Hematopoyesis/efectos de la radiación , Humanos , Traumatismos por Radiación/tratamiento farmacológico , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología
2.
Arch. Soc. Esp. Oftalmol ; 90(11): 527-530, nov. 2015. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-145383

RESUMEN

OBJETIVO: Determinar los niveles de interleuquina-6 (IL-6) en el vítreo de pacientes con desprendimiento de retina (DdR). MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Mediante vitrectomía vía pars plana, se recogieron muestras no diluidas de vítreo de 40 pacientes sin antecedentes de cirugía vítrea o intraocular previa, que fueron divididos en 2 grupos: A (n = 20) pacientes con DdR y B (n = 20) pacientes con membrana premacular y agujero macular. La concentración de IL-6 se determinó mediante radioinmunoensayo. RESULTADOS: La concentración vítrea de IL-6 en el grupo A fue 122,4 + -16 pg/mL (rango 91,5-620) y en el grupo B fue 46 +/- 23 pg/mL (rango 3-150) (p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONES: Estos resultados demuestran que la concentración vítrea de IL-6 está más elevada en los pacientes con DdR en comparación con el grupo control


OBJECTIVE: To measure interleuquin-6 (IL-6) levels in the vitreous body of patients with retinal detachment (RD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Undiluted vitreous samples were obtained from 40 patients with no history of prior vitreous or intraocular surgery. Patients were divided into two groups: A (n = 20) patients with RD and B (n = 20) patients with pre-retinal macular membranes and macular holes. IL-6 was determined using radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: IL-6 vitreous concentration in group A was 122.4 + -16 pg/mL (range 91.5-620) and in group B was 46 +/- 23 pg/mL (range 3-150) (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: These results show that the concentration of IL-6 in the vitreous body was significantly higher in patients with RD than in the control group


Asunto(s)
Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Receptores de Interleucina-6/administración & dosificación , Receptores de Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Desprendimiento de Retina/diagnóstico , Desprendimiento de Retina/metabolismo , Vitrectomía/métodos , Perforaciones de la Retina/patología , Consentimiento Informado/legislación & jurisprudencia , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades del Nervio Óptico/genética , Enfermedades del Nervio Óptico/metabolismo , Receptores de Interleucina-6/sangre , Receptores de Interleucina-6/deficiencia , Desprendimiento de Retina/complicaciones , Desprendimiento de Retina/patología , Vitrectomía/normas , Perforaciones de la Retina/metabolismo , Consentimiento Informado/normas , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/farmacología , Enfermedades del Nervio Óptico/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Nervio Óptico/diagnóstico
3.
Clin Exp Med ; 15(2): 145-50, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24722996

RESUMEN

Patients with lymphoproliferative disorders, candidate to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), require mobilization with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony -stimulating factor (G-CSF). This study looked for differences in hematopoietic peripheral stem cells (HPSCs) mobilization in response to the three available G-CSFs, namely lenograstim, filgrastim, and pegfilgrastim. Between 2000 and 2012, 146 patients (66 M and 80 F) who underwent ASCT for multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or Hodgkin's lymphoma were studied. All patients received induction therapy and then a mobilization regimen with cyclophosphamide plus lenograstim, or filgrastim, or pegfilgrastim. From days 12 to 14, HPSCs were collected by two to three daily leukaphereses. Our results show that high-dose cyclophosphamide plus lenograstim achieved adequate mobilization and the collection target more quickly and with fewer leukaphereses as compared to filgrastim and pegfilgrastim. No differences between the three regimens were observed regarding toxicity and days to WBC and platelet recovery. Thus, lenograstim may represent the ideal G-CSF for PBSC mobilization in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and better understand the biological bases of these differences.


Asunto(s)
Filgrastim/administración & dosificación , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/administración & dosificación , Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos de los fármacos , Linfoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Lenograstim , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polietilenglicoles , Proteínas Recombinantes/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 46(4): 523-8, 2011 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20622909

RESUMEN

The ideal method to mobilize autologous hematopoietic stem cells (AHSCs) in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma remains to be determined. The use of plerixafor, added to growth factor, may overcome the limitations to the use of growth factor mobilization without chemotherapy. We developed and validated a cost-based decision-making algorithm that uses the CD34+ cell count in the peripheral blood on the fourth day of G-CSF administration and the target CD34+ cell count for the specific patient to decide on the use of plerixafor (MUSC algorithm). We compared this approach (MA cohort) with a historical cohort of patients undergoing mobilization with CY 2000 mg/m(2) followed by G-CSF and GM-CSF (CY cohort). Fifty individuals are included in the MA cohort and 81 in the CY cohort. The mobilization failure rate was 2% in the MA cohort vs 22% in the CY cohort (P=0.01). Fewer patients in the MA cohort than in the CY cohort had infectious complications during mobilization requiring hospitalization (2 vs 30% P<0.01). There was significant shortening in the median number of days between starting mobilization and undergoing transplantation in the MA cohort (14 vs 43 days, P<0.01). In conclusion, growth factor and patient-adapted use of plerixafor provides safer hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and faster access to AHSC transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/administración & dosificación , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética/métodos , Compuestos Heterocíclicos/administración & dosificación , Algoritmos , Fármacos Anti-VIH , Antígenos CD34/análisis , Bencilaminas , Recuento de Células , Ciclamas , Femenino , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/administración & dosificación , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética/efectos adversos , Humanos , Infecciones/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante Autólogo
5.
Internist (Berl) ; 51(7): 863-71; quiz 872-3, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20544173

RESUMEN

The production of hematopoietic cells is under the tight control of distinct growth factors. As therapeutic agents, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), erythropoietin (EPO), and thrombopoiesis-stimulating agents (TSA) are in routine clinical use. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is used to prevent febrile neutropenia or to increase dose-density in chemotherapy regimens. Despite a reduced duration of neutropenia, randomized controlled trials have documented only a modest clinical benefit. A clinical advantage of dose-dense chemotherapy has been shown only in specific chemotherapy regimens. Clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of G-CSF for patients with a high risk of adverse outcome of febrile neutropenia. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are used as an alternative to blood transfusion in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia. However, recent meta-analyses of clinical studies suggest that their use was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. Thrombopoiesis-stimulating agents have been introduced recently into the market for patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Prior to the use of TSA in other conditions such as chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia the lessons learned with G-CSF and ESAs should be taken into account.


Asunto(s)
Anemia/etiología , Anemia/prevención & control , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/administración & dosificación , Neutropenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia/prevención & control , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente
6.
Intern Med J ; 39(4): 259-62, 2009 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19402867

RESUMEN

In cancer care in Australia, we are very reliant on an array of expensive pharmaceuticals. Our use of these treatments is often based on multinational or foreign clinical studies. Oncologists are, to varying degrees, reliant on how the studies are interpreted by the writers of journal editorials, clinical guidelines and opinion pieces. Therefore it is important that these guidelines are balanced and evidence based. We have examined in detail one of the most influential and wide ranging clinical guidelines used in oncology, The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2006 Update of Recommendations for the use of White Blood Cell Factors: An Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. We have discussed in detail some of the controversial recommendations in this guideline and have exposed what we believe are some flaws in these recommendations. We would urge that we continue to be rigorous in our oversight of international research agendas and international clinical guidelines in the future.


Asunto(s)
Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia/prevención & control , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Costos de los Medicamentos , Industria Farmacéutica , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/administración & dosificación , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/economía , Humanos , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Motivación , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Pronóstico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Innecesarios
8.
Semin Hematol ; 44(3): 138-47, 2007 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17631178

RESUMEN

In severe aplastic anemia (SAA), the use of hematopoietic growth factors (HGFs) to support blood counts is of limited value, as predicted by in vitro studies and measurement of endogenous serum levels of hematopoietic growth factors (HGF), which are markedly elevated. Benefit is usually only seen in those with less severe disease who are unlikely to require HGFs in practice. HGFs administered alone play no role in the treatment of SAA. The main indication for using HGFs, most often granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), in SAA has been to determine whether they increase the response rate to immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and improve survival. While earlier neutrophil recovery occurs when G-CSF is administered with IST, studies to date show no significant advantage in hematologic response or overall survival. Conflicting results have been reported concerning whether G-CSF increases the known risk of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after IST; follow-up of at least 10 years is required, lacking in many clinical studies reported to date. In MDS, HGFs have been used to counteract the intramedullary apoptosis, which leads to ineffective hematopoiesis. In several uncontrolled and controlled studies, especially in low-risk MDS, high-dose erythropoietin (EPO) or its glycosylated derivative darbepoetin (DPO), alone or in combination with G-CSF, increased hemoglobin levels and diminished the need for red blood cell transfusions, in selected patients with prior transfusion frequency of less than 2 units per month and EPO levels below 500 IU/L. Quality-of-life measures were claimed to have improved, but the cost-effectiveness of this approach is debated, as is safety with regard to the risk of progression. G-CSF is used in supportive care of MDS to improve neutropenia during infectious complications, but to date there is no compelling evidence for a survival benefit or alteration of the course of the disease through the use of HGFs in MDS.


Asunto(s)
Anemia Aplásica/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/uso terapéutico , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombocitopenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anemia Aplásica/sangre , Anemia Aplásica/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/administración & dosificación , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/sangre , Humanos , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/sangre , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/complicaciones , Neutropenia/sangre , Neutropenia/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trombocitopenia/sangre , Trombocitopenia/complicaciones
9.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 19(1): 75-81, 2007 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17218856

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Dose density is a relative term referring to the administration frequency of chemotherapy drugs and regimens compared with standard regimens. The concept of dose-dense chemotherapy is based on the hypothesis that maximal chemotherapy effectiveness can be achieved by scheduling the interval of chemotherapy to correspond to the period of most rapid tumor growth. The present paper aims to outline the theoretical framework for dose-dense chemotherapy and to review recent clinical trials addressing this concept within adjuvant breast cancer treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: Several randomized trials have been conducted to test the feasibility and effectiveness of anthracycline and/or taxanes-based dose-dense strategies. They demonstrate that using hematopoietic growth factor support has made dose-dense therapy safe and feasible. Dose-dense strategies have been associated with a modest impact on disease recurrence and overall survival of patients with early-stage breast cancer. Subset analyses suggest increased benefits for specific tumor subtypes such as hormone receptor-negative, highly proliferative or HER2 overexpressing tumors. SUMMARY: Trials in unselected patients with early-stage breast cancer have demonstrated promising results for dose-dense chemotherapy. Further studies are needed to define the optimal regimen and the patient population that will receive the greatest benefit from this therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Análisis de Supervivencia
10.
Oncologist ; 12(1): 79-89, 2007 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17227903

RESUMEN

The hypothesis that increasing cytotoxic dose intensity will improve cancer cure rates is compelling. Although supporting evidence for this hypothesis has accrued for several tumor types, including lymphomas, breast cancer, and testicular cancers, it remains unproven. Small-cell lung cancer is extremely chemo- and radiosensitive, with a response rate of 80% achieved routinely, but few patients are cured by chemoradiotherapy. In this setting, increased cytotoxic dose intensity might improve cure rates. The finding that response rates in small-cell lung cancer correlate with received cytotoxic dose intensity merely confirms that "less is worse" and "more is better." Within conventional ranges, dose intensity can be increased with the support of hematopoietic growth factors and/or by shortening treatments intervals; however, dose intensity could be increased by only 20%-30%, and a survival advantage has not been clearly demonstrated. Given its high chemosensitivity, small-cell lung cancer was one of the first malignancies deemed suitable for increasing dose intensity and even for the use of a megadose with the support of autologous bone marrow transplantation. Some interest is emerging again due to improvements in supportive care, such as the availability of hematopoietic growth factors and peripheral blood progenitor cells.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células Pequeñas/epidemiología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Circulation ; 113(5): 701-10, 2006 Feb 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16461843

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic cytokines, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and stem cell factor (SCF) were reported to show a neuroprotective effect or to support neurogenesis. These cytokines also mobilize bone marrow (BM) cells into the brain, and the BM-derived cells differentiate into neuronal cells. We administered these hematopoietic cytokines after focal cerebral ischemia and assessed their effects and the therapeutic time window for neuronal regeneration. METHODS AND RESULTS: We induced permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in mice whose BM had been replaced with BM cells from green fluorescent protein (GFP)-transgenic mice. The occluded mice were treated with G-CSF and SCF in the acute phase (days 1 to 10) or subacute phase (days 11 to 20), and the brain functions and histological changes were evaluated. Separately, we injected bromodeoxyuridine during cytokine treatment to assess cell kinetics in the brain. Six mice were prepared for each experimental group. Administration of G-CSF and SCF in the subacute phase effectively improved not only motor performance but also higher brain function, compared with acute-phase treatment. Acute-phase and subacute-phase treatments identically reduced the infarct volume relative to vehicle treatment. However, subacute-phase treatment significantly induced transition of BM-derived neuronal cells into the peri-infarct area and stimulated proliferation of intrinsic neural stem/progenitor cells in the neuroproliferative zone. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of G-CSF and SCF in the subacute phase after focal cerebral ischemia is effective for functional recovery, enhancing cytokine-induced generation of neuronal cells from both BM-derived cells and intrinsic neural stem/progenitor cells. Because G-CSF and SCF are available for clinical use, these findings suggest a new therapeutic strategy for stroke.


Asunto(s)
Infarto Cerebral/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/administración & dosificación , Neuronas/citología , Células Madre/citología , Animales , Células de la Médula Ósea , Encéfalo/citología , Diferenciación Celular , Movimiento Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética/métodos , Infarto de la Arteria Cerebral Media , Ratones , Ratones Transgénicos , Factor de Células Madre/administración & dosificación , Células Madre/fisiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Ann N Y Acad Sci ; 1054: 196-205, 2005.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16339666

RESUMEN

Current regular blood transfusion programs and chelation treatment have considerably improved survival of patients with thalassemia, which resulted in a larger proportion of adult patients. However, disease- and treatment-related complications in these patients progress over time, causing severe morbidity and shortened life expectancy. Stem cell transplantation still remains the only cure currently available for patients with thalassemia. This study updates transplant outcomes in 107 adult patients with median age of 22 years (range, 17-35 years) who received bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical related donors between 1988 and 1996 (group A) and describes the results of BMT in 15 adult patients with median age of 21 years (range, 17-31 years) who were treated with a new treatment protocol (Protocol 26) between 1997 and 2003 (group B). The probability of survival, event-free survival, nonrejection mortality, and rejection for group A patients were 66%, 62%, 37%, and 4%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 12 years (range, 8.3-16.2 years). Group B patients treated with the new protocol had some improvement in thalassemia-free survival (67%) and lower transplant-related mortality (27%) than that of previous protocols. However, transplant-related mortality in these high-risk patients remains elevated. Current myeloablative BMT in adult patients is characterized by higher transplant-related toxicity due to an advanced phase of disease. Although this new approach to transplant adult patients with a reduced-dose intensity-conditioning regimen has improved thalassemia-free survival, transplant-related mortality in these high-risk patients remains elevated.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea/estadística & datos numéricos , Talasemia/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Azatioprina/administración & dosificación , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/mortalidad , Busulfano/administración & dosificación , Terapia por Quelación , Protocolos Clínicos , Terapia Combinada , Comorbilidad , Deferoxamina/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Eritropoyetina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/epidemiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/prevención & control , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/administración & dosificación , Hemosiderosis/epidemiología , Hemosiderosis/etiología , Hemosiderosis/terapia , Humanos , Hidroxiurea/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Quelantes del Hierro/uso terapéutico , Tablas de Vida , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Masculino , Flebotomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Talasemia/complicaciones , Talasemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Talasemia/mortalidad , Talasemia/terapia , Reacción a la Transfusión , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/métodos , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/mortalidad , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/estadística & datos numéricos , Trasplante Homólogo/efectos adversos , Trasplante Homólogo/mortalidad , Trasplante Homólogo/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vidarabina/administración & dosificación , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados
13.
Cancer Invest ; 22(3): 405-16, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15493362

RESUMEN

The failure of conventional treatment modalities for gliomas, in spite of tremendous progress in research in the past two decades, has led to increasing interest in alternative treatment strategies, including immunotherapy. It has become evident that vaccination with dendritic cells (DC), designed to express tumor antigens, is a potent strategy to elicit anti-tumor immune response in both pre-clinical and clinical settings. Various methods have been applied in order to induce DC to express tumor antigens including: pulsing with isolated tumor peptides or whole tumor lysate; fusion with tumor cells; and pulsing with apoptotic tumor cells. Herein, we review the recent progress in DC biology with regard to tumor immunity and discuss current DC-based strategies and future prospects in immunotherapy for malignant gliomas.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico , Células Dendríticas/trasplante , Glioma/terapia , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Presentación de Antígeno , Antígenos de Neoplasias/inmunología , Apoptosis , Neoplasias Encefálicas/inmunología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/administración & dosificación , Fusión Celular , Células Cultivadas/inmunología , Células Cultivadas/trasplante , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , ADN de Neoplasias/administración & dosificación , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Predicción , Glioma/inmunología , Glioma/patología , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/administración & dosificación , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Células Híbridas/trasplante , ARN Neoplásico/administración & dosificación , Linfocitos T Citotóxicos/inmunología
14.
Wien Med Wochenschr ; 154(9-10): 226-34, 2004 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15244048

RESUMEN

Anemia in cancer patients is frequent but often underestimated. Anemia affects the health-related quality of life and impacts prognosis and outcome of therapy. Treatment options include the administration of hematopoietic growth factors and red blood cell transfusions. Blood transfusions result in rapid but often transient improvement of anemia. Administration of epoetin or darbepoetin alfa increases hemoglobin levels, decreases blood transfusions, and improves quality of life in patients with cancer. Presently, trials investigate whether treatment of anemic cancer patients with erythropoietin impacts on outcome of chemo- and/or radiotherapy and on overall survival. Oncologists must be aware of the clinical relevance of anemia and offer adequate treatment options to their patients. Supportive treatment of anemic cancer patients presenting anemia-related symptoms should be performed to reduce symptoms in cancer patients and optimize outcome to anticancer therapy.


Asunto(s)
Anemia/terapia , Eritropoyetina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias/fisiopatología , Cuidados Paliativos , Anemia/clasificación , Anemia/etiología , Transfusión Sanguínea , Darbepoetina alfa , Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Eritropoyetina/administración & dosificación , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/administración & dosificación , Hemoglobinometría , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia , Pronóstico , Proteínas Recombinantes
15.
Clin Perinatol ; 31(1): 169-82, 2004 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15183665

RESUMEN

The practice of complete bowel rest in prematurely delivered neonates and those who have undergone surgery for congenital anomalies of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is common in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). However, increased recognition of the critical role of growth factors in GI development suggests that this practice might be modified to include the administration of synthetic amniotic fluid-like solutions designed to bridge the neonate between their intra-uterine environment and that of the NICU. This article reviews advances in administering synthetic amniotic fluid-like solutions in the NICU.


Asunto(s)
Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/administración & dosificación , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Neonatología/métodos , Líquido Amniótico/química , Animales , Desarrollo Embrionario y Fetal , Humanos , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales del Lactante , Recién Nacido , Intestinos/embriología , Intubación Gastrointestinal , Soluciones/administración & dosificación
16.
Curr Hematol Rep ; 2(6): 453-8, 2003 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14561388

RESUMEN

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized clinically by refractory cytopenias in one or more myeloid cell lines and an increased probability of transformation to acute leukemia. Supportive care remains the mainstay of therapy in MDS and frequently includes monotherapy and combination therapy with hematopoietic growth factors, such as erythropoietin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Clinical trials have demonstrated the ability of growth factors to improve neutropenia and anemia in selected patients with MDS, which may have clinical, quality-of-life, and economic benefits for patients even though overall survival has not been improved. This paper reviews the role of hematopoietic growth factors in the treatment of MDS.


Asunto(s)
Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/uso terapéutico , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Citocinas/uso terapéutico , Eritropoyetina/administración & dosificación , Eritropoyetina/uso terapéutico , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/administración & dosificación , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/uso terapéutico , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Proteínas Recombinantes/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico
17.
Ann Oncol ; 14 Suppl 1: i29-36, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12736228

RESUMEN

Various chemotherapy regimens, combined with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(rhG-CSF) or recombinant granulocyte-macrophage CSF (rhGM-CSF) are used in cancer patients to mobilize and collect peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). In this retrospective study, we evaluated and compared the efficacy of such regimens in 262 patients with different types of malignant diseases. The following chemotherapy regimens were applied: ifosfamide-etoposide-cisplatin or bleomycin (n = 96; mainly patients with testicular cancer); ifosfamide-etoposide plus or minus cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) or vincristine (VCR)(n = 52; mainly patients with lymphoma); cyclophosphamide-anthracycline (n = 53; mainly patients with breast cancer); intermediate to high dose (ID-HD) cyclophosphamide (n = 37; mainly patients with breast or ovarian cancer. or multiple myeloma; and others (n = 24). rhG-CSF or rhGM-CSF, each at an average daily dose of 5 microg/kg body weight, were used in 166 and 96 patients, respectively. The study evaluated and compared the efficacy of these two cytokines. In patients receiving rhG-CSF, CD34+ cells could be collected earlier (median: day 14 versus day 16) and there was a significantly higher white blood cell count (WBC)(median 11,350 versus 5550/microl) and CD34+ cell count (median 88 versus 43/microl) at the start of apheresis, and a significantly higher CD34+ cell yield (median 7.4 x 10(6) versus 4.6 x 10(6)/kg) than in patients who receivedrhGM-CSF. Among the various chemotherapeutic regimens used, each combined with rhG-CSF, ifosfamide-etoposide plus or minus Ara-C or VCR mobilized a significantly higher number of CD34+ cells (median 119/microl) and produced a significantly higher harvest of these cells (median 13 x 10(6)/kg) than cyclophosphamide-anthracycline (median 87/microl and 7 x 10(6)/kg, respectively) or ID-HD cyclophosphamide (median 59/microl and 5 x I 0(6)/kg, respectively). Ifosfamide-etoposide plus or minus Ara-C or VCR was also superior to ifosfamide-etoposide-cisplatin or bleomycin (median 78/microl and 9 x 10(6)/kg, respectively), but at borderline significance. The outcome of PBSC mobilization and collection appeared to be negatively influenced by the number of relapses before the current salvage treatment. These data indicate that mobilization and collection of PBSCstrongly depend on the type of hematopoietic growth factor and chemotherapeutic regimen used. The data further show rhG-CSF is a more effective growth factor than rhGM-CSF and ifosfamide-etoposide-based regimens, particularly ifosfamide-etoposide plus or minus Ara-C or VCR, are highly effective regimens in mobilizing and collecting CD34+ cells.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/administración & dosificación , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética/métodos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre Periférica/métodos , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/administración & dosificación , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/sangre , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Neoplasias/sangre , Neoplasias/cirugía , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Proteínas Recombinantes , Estudios Retrospectivos
18.
Acta Paediatr Suppl ; 91(438): 43-53, 2002.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12477264

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: By 20 wk of gestation, the human fetal gastrointestinal (GI) tract morphologically resembles that of the term infant, but functional development is limited before 26 wk. By 30 wk of gestation, the fetus has the capacity for limited digestion and enteral absorption. GI growth and development continue postnatally. Trophic factors, including nutrients, peptides, hormones and growth factors, are recognized as having important influences on the morphology and histology of the developing GI tract. Other trophic factors are important in adaptation and repair following injury. Many such factors are provided in utero via amniotic fluid swallowing and later by human colostrum and milk. CONCLUSION: This review discusses cytokines with known GI trophic effects, either in vitro or in vivo, and focuses on those cytokines that have been used in the neonatal intensive care unit.


Asunto(s)
Citocinas/metabolismo , Sistema Digestivo/embriología , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/administración & dosificación , Preñez , Animales , Animales Recién Nacidos , Desarrollo Embrionario y Fetal/fisiología , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Infusiones Parenterales , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Embarazo , Conejos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
20.
Lancet ; 356(9238): 1325-6, 2000 Oct 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11073025

RESUMEN

We observed an unexpectedly rapid rise in platelet counts with complete haematological recovery after a BEAM regimen, in a patient who could not be rescued by autologous transplant but who received filgrastim, epoetin alfa, and ancestim. We feel that these results may be attributed to this specific growth factor combination, including ancestim, a cytokine known to act on primitive stem cells. If confirmed, this observation may open new possibilities in intensive chemotherapy for patients for whom haematopoietic progenitors are difficult to harvest. This may also represent an alternative to ex-vivo expansion and deserves further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Recuento de Células Sanguíneas , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/uso terapéutico , Hematopoyesis/efectos de los fármacos , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/administración & dosificación , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/uso terapéutico , Linfoma no Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carmustina/uso terapéutico , Citarabina/uso terapéutico , Epoetina alfa , Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Eritropoyetina/uso terapéutico , Etopósido/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/efectos adversos , Humanos , Melfalán/uso terapéutico , Transfusión de Plaquetas , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA