Asunto(s)
Honorarios y Precios/legislación & jurisprudencia , Honorarios Médicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Seguro de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/economía , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Financiación Personal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Precios de Hospital/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cobertura del Seguro/legislación & jurisprudencia , Seguro de Salud/economía , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study analyses the financial burden associated with the introduction of copayment for long-term care (LTC) in Spain in 2012 for dependent individuals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyse and identify households for which the dependency-related out-of-pocket payment exceeds the defined catastrophic threshold (incidence), and the gap between the copayment and the threshold for the catastrophic copayment (intensity), for the full population sample and for subsamples based on the level of long-term care dependency and on regional characteristics (regional income and political ideology of party ruling the region). RESULTS: The results obtained show there is a higher risk of impoverishment due to copayment among relatively well-off dependents, although the financial burden falls more heavily on less well-off households. Our findings also reveal interesting regional patterns of inequity in financing and access to long-term care services, which appear to be explained by an uneven development of LTC services (monetary transfers versus formal services) and varying levels of copayment across regions. CONCLUSIONS: The new copayment for long-term care dependency in Spain is an important factor of catastrophic risk, and more attention should be addressed to policies aimed at improving the progressivity of out-of-pocket payments for LTC services within and between regions. In addition, formal services should be prioritised in all regions in order to guarantee equal access for equal need.
Asunto(s)
Financiación Personal/economía , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Composición Familiar , Financiación Personal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política , Pobreza , EspañaAsunto(s)
Reforma de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Egipto , Financiación Personal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Financiación Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , HumanosRESUMEN
Issue: Since 2001, long before the passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance Survey has examined health coverage and consumers' experiences buying insurance and using health care. Goals: To examine long-term trends and to make comparisons before and after passage of health reform. Methods: Analysis of the Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance Survey, 2016. Findings and Conclusions: There have been dramatic improvements in people's ability to buy health plans on their own following the passage of the ACA. For adults with family incomes less than $48,500, uninsured rates dropped about 17 percentage points below their 2010 peak. Lower-income whites, blacks, and Latinos have experienced drops this large, though Latinos are uninsured at higher rates. Among working-age adults who had shopped for plans in the individual market and ACA marketplaces over the prior three years, the percentage who reported it was very difficult to find affordable plans fell by nearly half from 2010, prior to the ACA reforms, to 2016. Coverage gains are helping working-age Americans get the care they need: the number of adults who reported problems getting needed health care and filling prescriptions because of costs fell from a high of 80 million in 2012 to an estimated 63 million in 2016.
Asunto(s)
Cobertura del Seguro/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes no Asegurados/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Empleo , Etnicidad , Financiación Personal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Financiación Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Financiación Personal/tendencias , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/tendencias , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Intercambios de Seguro Médico , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/tendencias , Seguro de Salud/tendencias , Persona de Mediana Edad , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/tendencias , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/tendencias , Pobreza , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/tendencias , Grupos Raciales , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Dapsona/uso terapéutico , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos , Medicare , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Penfigoide Benigno de la Membrana Mucosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Rol del Médico , Corticoesteroides/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/legislación & jurisprudencia , Dapsona/economía , Aprobación de Drogas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Financiación Personal/economía , Financiación Personal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/economía , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Cobertura del Seguro/legislación & jurisprudencia , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/economía , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Masculino , Medicare/economía , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Minnesota , Ácido Micofenólico/economía , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapéutico , Penfigoide Benigno de la Membrana Mucosa/economía , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
One-quarter of privately insured working-age adults have high health care cost burdens relative to their incomes in 2015, according to the Commonwealth Fund Health Care Affordability Index, a comprehensive measure of consumer health care costs. This figure, which is based on a nationally representative sample of people with private insurance who are mainly covered by employer plans, is statistically unchanged from 2014. When looking specifically at adults with low incomes, more than half have high cost burdens. In addition, when privately insured adults were asked how they rated their affordability, greater shares reported their premiums and deductible costs were difficult or impossible to afford than the Index would suggest. Health plan deductibles and copayments had negative effects on many people's willingness to get needed health care or fill prescriptions. In addition, many consumers are confused about which services are free to them and which count toward their deductible.
Asunto(s)
Deducibles y Coseguros/economía , Financiación Personal/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Seguro de Salud/economía , Sector Privado/economía , Deducibles y Coseguros/legislación & jurisprudencia , Deducibles y Coseguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Financiación Personal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Renta , Seguro de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Sector Privado/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Costos de los Medicamentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Financiación Personal/economía , Financiación Personal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adhesión a Directriz/economía , Adhesión a Directriz/legislación & jurisprudencia , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , EmbarazoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In January 2006, the Korean government implemented a copayment waiver policy for hospitalized children under the age of 6 years to reduce the economic burden on patients. This policy was implemented from 2006 to 2007 in Korea and involved hospitalized children under the age of 6 years. The goal of this study is to evaluate the effect of the copayment waiver policy on health insurance beneficiaries. METHODS: The change in medical service utilization before and after the policy implementation was analyzed using data from the national health insurance corporation (NHIC) and compared with medical aid beneficiaries who were already exempt from copayment. The "difference in difference" method was applied to determine the net effect of the copayment waiver policy. RESULTS: The net effect of policy implementation on NHIC beneficiaries was unclear by the "difference in difference" method because the number of inpatient days and hospital expenditure after policy implementation showed opposite results. The copayment waiver policy did not decrease the intensity of health care utilization when compared with the medical aid beneficiaries group. Among the NHIC beneficiaries, patients who utilized medical services for fatal disease and those with the low premiums group were more affected by the policy. CONCLUSIONS: The net effect of copayment waiver policy remains unclear. Therefore, further studies are needed to determine the effects of policies implemented to reduce the economic burden on patients, such as the herein-described copayment waiver policy.
Asunto(s)
Niño Hospitalizado , Seguro de Costos Compartidos , Financiación Personal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política de Salud , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , República de CoreaAsunto(s)
Medicare/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Conducta de Elección , Financiación Gubernamental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Financiación Gubernamental/métodos , Financiación Personal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Financiación Personal/métodos , Humanos , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicare/normas , Política , Mecanismo de Reembolso/legislación & jurisprudencia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/normas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) capacity taskforce was established to promote the autonomy, proper access to care, and dignity of persons with decision-making disabilities (DMDs) across nations. The Asia Consortium of the taskforce was established to pursue these goals in the Asia-Pacific region. This paper is part of the Asia Consortium's initiative to promote understanding and advocacy in regard to surrogate decision-making across the region. METHOD: The current guardianship laws are compared, and jurisdictional variations in the processes for proxy decision-making to support persons with DMDs and other health and social needs in China, Japan, Thailand, and Australia are explored. RESULTS: The different Asia-Pacific countries have various proxy decision-making mechanisms in place for persons with DMDs, which are both formalized according to common law, civil law, and other legislation, and shaped by cultural practices. Various processes for guardianship and mechanisms for medical decision-making and asset management exist across the region. Processes that are still evolving across the region include those that facilitate advanced planning as a result of the paucity of legal structures for enduring powers of attorney (EPA) and guardianship in some regions, and the struggle to achieve consensual positions in regard to end-of-life decision-making. Formal processes for supporting decision-making are yet to be developed. CONCLUSIONS: The diverse legal approaches to guardianship and administration must be understood to meet the challenges of the rapidly ageing population in the Asia-Pacific region. Commonalities in the solutions and difficulties faced in encountering these challenges have global significance.
Asunto(s)
Tutores Legales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Competencia Mental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Directivas Anticipadas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Anciano , Australia , China , Toma de Decisiones , Financiación Personal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Japón , Derechos del Paciente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cuidado Terminal/legislación & jurisprudencia , TailandiaAsunto(s)
Cuidadores/economía , Cuidadores/legislación & jurisprudencia , Financiación Personal/economía , Financiación Personal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Hogares para Ancianos/economía , Hogares para Ancianos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Responsabilidad Legal , Indigencia Médica/economía , Indigencia Médica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Casas de Salud/economía , Casas de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Anciano , Alemania , HumanosRESUMEN
Whether they have health insurance through an employer or buy it on their own, Americans are paying more out-of-pocket for health care now than they did in the past decade. A Commonwealth Fund survey fielded in the fall of 2014 asked consumers about these costs. More than one of five 19-to-64-year-old adults who were insured all year spent 5 percent or more of their income on out-of-pocket costs, not including premiums, and 13 percent spent 10 percent or more. Adults with low incomes had the highest rates of steep out-of-pocket costs. About three of five privately insured adults with low incomes and half of those with moderate incomes reported that their deductibles are difficult to afford. Two of five adults with private insurance who had high deductibles relative to their income said they had delayed needed care because of the deductible.