Determination of salmeterol, α-hydroxysalmeterol and fluticasone propionate in human urine and plasma for doping control using UHPLC-QTOF-MS.

Salmeterol and fluticasone are included in the Prohibited List annually issued by the World Anti-Doping Agency. While for other permitted beta-2 agonists a threshold has been established, above which any finding constitutes an Adverse Analytical Finding, this is not the case with salmeterol. The salmeterol metabolite, α-hydroxysalmeterol, has been described as a potentially more suitable biomarker for the misuse of inhaled salmeterol. In this study, a new and rapid UHPLC-QTOF-MS method was developed and validated for the simultaneous quantification of salmeterol, α-hydroxysalmeterol and fluticasone in human urine and plasma, which can be used for doping control. The analytes of interest were extracted by means of solid phase extraction and were separated on a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 column. Detection was performed in a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization source, in positive mode for the detection of salmeterol and its metabolite and in negative mode for the detection of fluticasone. Method was validated over a linear range from 0.10 to 2.00 ng/ml for salmeterol and fluticasone, and from 1.00 to 20.0 ng/ml for α-hydroxysalmeterol, in urine, whereas in plasma, the linear range was from 0.025 to 0.500 ng/ml for salmeterol and fluticasone, respectively.

Effect of Food Intake and Body Position on the Pharmacokinetics of Swallowed APT-1011, a Fluticasone Orally Disintegrating Tablet, in Healthy Adult Volunteers.

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a common atopic disease of the esophagus. APT-1011 is an orally disintegrating tablet formulation of fluticasone propionate under development for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of APT-1011 under fed or fasted conditions in the morning (am) or at bedtime (hs) in the supine position. The study was a randomized, single-dose, 3-way, crossover design in healthy adult volunteers. In each study period participants received 2 3-mg orally disintegrating APT-1011 tablets. Serial plasma samples were collected before dosing and up to 72 hours after each dose. Twenty-two participants completed the study. The fluticasone propionate peak concentration (Cmax ) ranged from 5.97 to 200 pg/mL. Compared with am-fasted dosing, am-fed dosing was associated with a modestly higher Cmax (∼21%) but lower net exposure (area under the concentration-time curve ∼56% difference) and shorter time to reach Cmax (Tmax ) (Tmax fasted = 10 hours, fed = 5 hours). Dosing at hs resulted in an 18% and 32% decrease in Cmax relative to am-fasted and am-fed conditions, respectively. Dosing at hs led to an exposure that was higher than am-fed but lower than am-fasted dosing. Tmax with hs dosing (14 hours) was later than that with am dosing (Tmax fasted = 10 hours, fed = 5 hours). Adverse events were mild. There is low systemic exposure of fluticasone propionate with APT-1011. The rate of absorption was increased with a high-fat meal but decreased with hs dosing, suggesting the potential for longer dwell times in the esophagus.

A Randomized Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability of Fluticasone Propionate Delivered via Xhance Exhalation Delivery System Versus Flonase Nasal Spray and Flovent HFA Inhalational Aerosol.

PURPOSE: The exhalation delivery system with fluticasone propionate (Xhance®) has been shown to deliver drug substantially more broadly in the nasal cavity (particularly into superior/posterior regions), with less off-target loss of drug to drip-out and swallowing, than conventional nasal sprays. This open-label study evaluated the systemic bioavailability of Xhance® by comparing the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of a single dose of fluticasone from 3 products administering the drug using 3 different devices: Xhance®, Flonase® (fluticasone propionate inhalational nasal spray), and Flovent® HFA (fluticasone propionate inhalational aerosol). METHODS: This open-label study was conducted in 2 parts. Study part 1 compared systemic exposure with a single dose of Xhance® 186 or 372 µg versus Flonase® 400 µg (3-way, 3-treatment, 3-sequence, randomized crossover in healthy subjects; n = 90). A separate study, part 2, under the same umbrella protocol, compared systemic exposure with Xhance® 372 µg versus Flovent® HFA 440 µg (2-way, 2-treatment, 2-sequence, randomized crossover in patients with mild to moderate asthma; n = 30). FINDINGS: With Xhance® 186 µg, the geometric least squares mean (LSM) Cmax was higher than with Flonase® 400 µg (16.02 vs 11.66 pg/mL, respectively; geometric mean ratio [GMR], 137.42%) and the geometric LSM AUC0-∞ values were similar (97.30 vs 99.61 pg · h/mL; GMR, 97.78%). With Xhance® 372 µg, the geometric LSM Cmax and AUC0-∞ were higher than with Flonase® 400 µg (Cmax, 23.50 vs 11.66 pg/mL [GMR, 201.53%]; AUC0-∞, 146.61 vs 99.61 pg · h/mL [GMR, 147.19%]). In part 2, the geometric LSM Cmax and AUC0-∞ values were lower with Xhance® 372 µg than with Flovent® HFA 440 µg (Cmax, 25.28 vs 40.02 pg/mL [GMR, 63.18%]; AUC0-∞, 205.78 vs 415.16 pg · h/mL [GMR, 49.57%]). IMPLICATIONS: Similar intranasal doses of Xhance® (372 µg) and Flonase® (400 µg) are clearly not bioequivalent. Systemic exposure is very low with all products. Systemic exposure is higher with Xhance® than with Flonase® and substantially lower than with Flovent® HFA 440 µg and, based on dose normalization, Flovent® HFA 220 µg. ClincalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02266927.

Fetal Concentrations of Budesonide and Fluticasone Propionate: a Study in Mice.

The study goal was to evaluate the transplacental transfer of two corticosteroids, budesonide (BUD) and fluticasone propionate (FP), in pregnant mice and investigate whether P-glycoprotein (P-gp) might be involved in reducing BUD transplacental transfer. Pregnant mice (N = 18) received intravenously either low (104.9 µg/kg) or high (1049 µg/kg) dose of [3H]-BUD or a high dose of [3H]-FP (1590 µg/kg). In a separate experiment, pregnant mice (N = 12) received subcutaneously either the P-gp inhibitor zosuquidar (20 mg/kg) or vehicle, followed by an intravenous infusion of [3H]-BUD (104.9 µg/kg). Total and free (protein unbound) corticosteroid concentrations were determined in plasma, brain, fetus, placenta, kidney, and liver. The ratios of free BUD concentrations in fetus versus plasma K(fetus, plasma, u, u) 0.42 ± 0.17 (mean ± SD) for low-dose and 0.38 ± 0.18 for high-dose BUD were significantly different from K = 1 (P < 0.05), contrary to 0.87 ± 0.25 for FP, which was moreover significantly higher than that for matching high-dose BUD (P < 0.01). The BUD brain/plasma ratio was also significantly smaller than K = 1, while these ratios for other tissues were close to 1. In the presence of the P-gp inhibitor, K(fetus, plasma, u, u) for BUD (0.59 ± 0.16) was significantly increased over vehicle treatment (0.31 ± 0.10; P < 0.01). This is the first in vivo study demonstrating that transplacental transfer of BUD is significantly lower than FP's transfer and that placental P-gp may be involved in reducing the fetal exposure to BUD. The study provides a mechanistic rationale for BUD's use in pregnancy.

Simultaneous analysis of glucocorticosteroid fluticasone propionate and its metabolite fluticasone propionate 17ß-carboxylic acid in human plasma by UPLC-MS/MS at sub pg/mL level.

A highly sensitive and rapid ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method has been developed for the simultaneous determination of fluticasone propionate (FP) and its major metabolite, fluticasone propionate-17beta-carboxylic acid (FP 17ß-CA) in human plasma. The analytes and their deuterated internal standards, FP-d3 and FP 17ß-CA-d3 were extracted from 500µL plasma samples by solid phase extraction on Oasis MAX cartridges. The chromatographic analysis was performed on ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 (50mm×2.1mm, 1.7µm) column using methanol-acetonitrile (50:50, v/v) and 2.0mM ammonium trifluroacetate (ATFA) (85:15, v/v) as the mobile phase. Following separation of the analytes, protonated precursor→product ion transitions (FP: m/z 501.1→293.2, FP17ß-CA: m/z 453.3→293.2, FP-d3: m/z 504.2→293.2, FP 17ß-CA-d3: m/z 456.3→293.2) were monitored on FP 17ß-CA a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, operating in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) and positive ionization mode. The calibration curves were established in the range of 0.5-100pg/mL with a correlation coefficient (r2)≥0.9992 for both the analytes. The intra-batch and inter-batch accuracy and precision varied from 95.5-103.4% and 0.74-5.06% across quality controls for both the analytes. The mean assay recoveries for FP and FP 17ß-CA were 84.2% and 93.5% respectively. The validated method was successfully applied to support a bioequivalence study of 200µg FP, administered using nasal spray formulation in 18 healthy Indian subjects. Reproducibility of the method was assessed by reanalysis of 98 incurred study samples.

Systems Pharmacology Approach for Prediction of Pulmonary and Systemic Pharmacokinetics and Receptor Occupancy of Inhaled Drugs.

Pulmonary drug disposition after inhalation is complex involving mechanisms, such as regional drug deposition, dissolution, and mucociliary clearance. This study aimed to develop a systems pharmacology approach to mechanistically describe lung disposition in rats and thereby provide an integrated understanding of the system. When drug- and formulation-specific properties for the poorly soluble drug fluticasone propionate were fed into the model, it proved predictive of the pharmacokinetics and receptor occupancy after intravenous administration and nose-only inhalation. As the model clearly distinguishes among drug-specific, formulation-specific, and system-specific properties, it was possible to identify key determinants of pulmonary selectivity of receptor occupancy of inhaled drugs: slow particle dissolution and slow drug-receptor dissociation. Hence, it enables assessment of factors for lung targeting, including molecular properties, formulation, as well as the physiology of the animal species, thereby providing a general framework for rational drug design and facilitated translation of lung targeting from animal to man.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of a New Fluticasone Propionate Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler Compared With Fluticasone Propionate Diskus(®) in Healthy Adults.

BACKGROUND: Fluticasone propionate (Fp) is an inhaled corticosteroid with well-established safety and efficacy profiles. This study evaluated the systemic pharmacokinetics of Fp inhaled from a novel, inhalation-driven multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) that does not require coordination of actuation with inhalation. METHODS: This was a single-center, open-label, randomized, 3-period crossover, single-dose study in healthy Japanese and Caucasian subjects aged 20-45 years, inclusive. Subjects were randomized to one of six treatment sequences including combinations of four inhalations of Fp MDPI 100 µg (400 µg total dose), Fp MDPI 200 µg (800 µg total dose), and Fp Diskus(®) 100 µg (400 µg total dose). The primary objective was to assess pharmacokinetics (maximum plasma concentration [Cmax] and area under concentration-vs.-time curve [AUC]) for each treatment. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: Thirty subjects (15 Caucasian, 15 Japanese) met entry criteria and were randomized; all 30 subjects completed the study. At the inhaled Fp total doses evaluated (400 and 800 µg), the shapes of plasma concentration-vs.-time curves and systemic exposure (AUC0-t and Cmax) were similar in Japanese and Caucasian subjects. Geometric mean ratios (Japanese/Caucasian) for AUC0-t ranged from 1.11 to 1.15, and for Cmax ranged from 0.90 to 1.05, with no substantial differences between ethnic groups. In both ethnic groups, and in the combined population, systemic exposure (AUC0-t and Cmax) was highest for Fp MDPI 800 µg, followed by Fp MDPI 400 µg, and last by Fp Diskus 400 µg. No clinical laboratory, vital signs, or physical examination findings were considered clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic exposure following inhaled single doses of Fp was comparable in healthy adult Japanese and Caucasian subjects for each total dose and inhaler. The new MDPI provided more efficient drug delivery than Diskus, suggesting that Fp MDPI may provide similar clinical efficacy at a lower inhaled dose compared with Diskus. Single-dose inhaled Fp (400-800 µg) was generally well tolerated in healthy adults.

Pharmacokinetics of fluticasone propionate multidose, inhalation-driven, novel, dry powder inhaler versus a prevailing dry powder inhaler and a metered-dose inhaler.

BACKGROUND: A novel inhalation-driven multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) that eliminates the need for the patient to coordinate device actuation with inhalation has been developed for delivery of inhaled asthma medications. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the pharmacokinetics of single-dose fluticasone propionate (Fp) MDPI compared with single doses of Fp dry powder inhaler (DPI) and a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) in healthy subjects. METHODS: This was a single-center, open-label, randomized, three-period crossover, single-dose pilot study in healthy adults ages 18 to 45 years. Eligible subjects (N = 18) were randomized to one of six treatment sequences that contained three treatment arms: Fp MDPI 400 µg/inhalation × two inhalations (800 µg total dose); Fp DPI 250 µg/inhalation × four (1000 µg total dose); and Fp MDI 220 µg/inhalation × four (880 µg total dose). Pharmacokinetics (area under concentration-versus-time curve [AUC], maximum plasma concentration [Cmax], time to Cmax [tmax], and elimination half-life [t½]), safety, and tolerability were assessed for each treatment. RESULTS: Plasma Fp concentration-versus-time curves were comparable across treatments. Geometric mean AUC0-t and Cmax for Fp MDPI 800 µg were 19% and 18% higher, respectively, compared with Fp DPI 1000 µg, and 47% and 82% higher, respectively, compared with Fp MDI 880 µg. Median tmax (60.0-60.6 minutes) and median t1/2 (9.1-9.8 hours) were comparable across the three treatments. Single-dose Fp was well tolerated, with no new safety issues noted. CONCLUSION: Single-dose administration of Fp MDPI 800 µg produced systemic exposure comparable with those for Fp DPI 1000 µg and Fp MDI 880 µg.