Pharmacological interventions for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stenosis is narrowing of the carotid arteries. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis is when this narrowing occurs in people without a history or symptoms of this disease. It is caused by atherosclerosis; that is, the build-up of fats, cholesterol, and other substances in and on the artery walls. Atherosclerosis is more likely to occur in people with several risk factors, such as diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, and smoking. As this damage can develop without symptoms, the first symptom can be a fatal or disabling stroke, known as ischaemic stroke. Carotid stenosis leading to ischaemic stroke is most common in men older than 70 years. Ischaemic stroke is a worldwide public health problem. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of pharmacological interventions for the treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis in preventing neurological impairment, ipsilateral major or disabling stroke, death, major bleeding, and other outcomes. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases, and three trials registers from their inception to 9 August 2022. We also checked the reference lists of any relevant systematic reviews identified and contacted specialists in the field for additional references to trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs), irrespective of publication status and language, comparing a pharmacological intervention to placebo, no treatment, or another pharmacological intervention for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. Two review authors independently extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias of the trials. A third author resolved disagreements when necessary. We assessed the evidence certainty for key outcomes using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 34 RCTs with 11,571 participants. Data for meta-analysis were available from only 22 studies with 6887 participants. The mean follow-up period was 2.5 years. None of the 34 included studies assessed neurological impairment and quality of life. Antiplatelet agent (acetylsalicylic acid) versus placebo Acetylsalicylic acid (1 study, 372 participants) may result in little to no difference in ipsilateral major or disabling stroke (risk ratio (RR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47 to 2.47), stroke-related mortality (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.54 to 3.59), progression of carotid stenosis (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.71), and adverse events (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.59), compared to placebo (all low-certainty evidence). The effect of acetylsalicylic acid on major bleeding is very uncertain (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.06 to 15.53; very low-certainty evidence). The study did not measure neurological impairment or quality of life. Antihypertensive agents (metoprolol and chlorthalidone) versus placebo The antihypertensive agent, metoprolol, may result in no difference in ipsilateral major or disabling stroke (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02 to1.16; 1 study, 793 participants) and stroke-related mortality (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.94; 1 study, 793 participants) compared to placebo (both low-certainty evidence). However, chlorthalidone may slow the progression of carotid stenosis (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.91; 1 study, 129 participants; low-certainty evidence) compared to placebo. Neither study measured neurological impairment, major bleeding, adverse events, or quality of life. Anticoagulant agent (warfarin) versus placebo The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of warfarin (1 study, 919 participants) on major bleeding (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.46; very low-certainty evidence), but it may reduce adverse events (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99; low-certainty evidence) compared to placebo. The study did not measure neurological impairment, ipsilateral major or disabling stroke, stroke-related mortality, progression of carotid stenosis, or quality of life. Lipid-lowering agents (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, probucol, and rosuvastatin) versus placebo or no treatment Lipid-lowering agents may result in little to no difference in ipsilateral major or disabling stroke (atorvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin; RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.53; 5 studies, 2235 participants) stroke-related mortality (lovastatin and pravastatin; RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.29; 2 studies, 1366 participants), and adverse events (fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, probucol, and rosuvastatin; RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.53 to1.10; 7 studies, 3726 participants) compared to placebo or no treatment (all low-certainty evidence). The studies did not measure neurological impairment, major bleeding, progression of carotid stenosis, or quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although there is no high-certainty evidence to support pharmacological intervention, this does not mean that pharmacological treatments are ineffective in preventing ischaemic cerebral events, morbidity, and mortality. High-quality RCTs are needed to better inform the best medical treatment that may reduce the burden of carotid stenosis. In the interim, clinicians will have to use other sources of information.

Plasma mevalonic acid exposure as a pharmacodynamic biomarker of fluvastatin/atorvastatin in healthy volunteers.

Fluvastatin and atorvastatin are inhibitors of hydroxy-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase, the enzyme that converts HMG-CoA to mevalonic acid (MVA). The present study reports for the first time the analysis of mevalonolactone (MVL) in plasma samples by UPLC-MS/MS as well as the use of MVA, analyzed as MVL, as a pharmacodynamics parameter of fluvastatin in multiple oral doses (20, 40 or 80 mg/day for 7 days) and atorvastatin in a single oral dose (20, 40 or 80 mg) in healthy female volunteers. this study presents the use of MVL exposure as a pharmacodynamics biomarker of fluvastatin in multiple oral doses (20, 40 or 80 mg/day for 7 days) or atorvastatin in a single oral dose (20, 40 or 80 mg) in healthy volunteers (n = 30). The administration of multiple doses of fluvastatin (n = 15) does not alter the values (geometric mean and 95 % CI) of AUC0-24 h of MVL [72.00 (57.49-90.18) vs 65.57 (51.73-83.12) ng∙h/mL], but reduces AUC0-6 h [15.33 (11.85-19.83) vs 8.15 (6.18-10.75) ng∙h/mL] by approximately 47 %, whereas single oral dose administration of atorvastatin (n = 15) reduces both AUC0-24 h [75.79 (65.10-88.24) vs 32.88 (27.05-39.96) ng∙h/mL] and AUC0-6 h [17.07 (13.87-21.01) vs 7.01 (5.99-8.22) ng∙h/mL] values by approximately 57 % and 59 %, respectively. In conclusion, the data show that the plasma exposure of MVL represents a reliable pharmacodynamic parameter for PK-PD (pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic) studies of fluvastatin in multiple doses and atorvastatin in a single dose.

Rheumatoid arthritis downregulates the drug transporter OATP1B1: Fluvastatin as a probe.

AIMS: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a long term autoimmune inflammatory disease characterized by high autoantibody production and cytokine release, especially IL-6 and TNF-α. Some clinical studies have shown the effect of RA on CYP metabolism. However, the effect of RA on the drug transporter OATP1B1 remains a gap. METHODS: Patients with RA under pharmacological treatment (n = 10) and healthy volunteers (n = 15) treated for seven consecutive days with racemic fluvastatin (20, 40, or 80 mg/24 h) were investigated. Serial blood samples were collected during the last dose interval. All participants were assessed for cytokine profile and CYP2C9 genotype. RESULTS: Patients with RA showed increased plasma concentrations of IFN-γ and TNF-α up to two and four times, respectively, when compared to healthy volunteers, whereas CYP2C9 activity based on genotype was considered normal or slightly reduced for both investigated groups. When compared to healthy volunteers, patients with RA presented higher values (median and 25th-75th percentiles) of normalized AUC for 20 mg dose (250 [114-405] vs. 96.7 [78.1-131] ng h mL-1 for (-)-3S,5R-fluvastatin and 163 [96.9-325] vs. 83.1 [61.7-107] ng⋅h⋅mL-1 for (+)-3R,5S-fluvastatin) and lower values of CL/F (40.9 [24.5-89.1] vs. 103 [75.9-128] L⋅h-1 for (-)-3S,5R-fluvastatin and 61.4 [30.6-103] vs. 120 [93.0-162] L⋅h-1 for (+)-3R,5S-fluvastatin) and V/F (73.0 [28.5-117] vs. 143 [108-221] L for (-)-3S,5R-fluvastatin and 93.9 [32.7-116] vs. 153 [122-234] L for (+)-3R,5S-fluvastatin) for both enantiomers. CONCLUSION: The lower values of CL/F and V/F for both fluvastatin enantiomers in RA patients suggest that the inflammatory disease downregulates the sinusoidal drug transporter OATP1B1, the rate-determining step in the hepatic clearance of fluvastatin.

Solid-state characterization and dissolution properties of Fluvastatin sodium salt hydrates.

The present study reports the solid-state properties of Fluvastatin sodium salt crystallized from different solvents for comparison with crystalline forms of the commercially available raw material and United States Pharmacopeia (USP) reference standard. Fluvastatin (FLV) samples were characterized by several techniques; such as X-ray powder diffractometry, differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetry, liquid and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. In addition, intrinsic dissolution rate (IDR) of samples was performed in order to study the influence of crystalline form and other factors on rate and extent of dissolution. Three different forms were found. The commercial raw material and Fluvastatin-Acetonitrile (ACN) were identified as "form I" hydrate, the USP reference standard as "form II" hydrate and an ethanol solvate which presented a mixture of phases. Form I, with water content of 4%, was identified as monohydrate.

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (fluvastatin) decreases inflammatory angiogenesis in mice.

Statins, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, have been shown to ameliorate a number of vascular diseases. We evaluated the inflammatory and angiogenic components of the fibrovascular tissue induced by subcutaneous implants in mice and their modulation by fluvastatin. Our results showed that the statin (0.6 and 6 mg/kg/day) inhibited hemoglobin (Hb) content (51%) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels (71%) in the treated group compared with the control group. The inflammatory component, as assessed by N-acetyl-ß-D-glucosaminidase activity and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) level was also decreased by the compound. In the treated group; the inhibition of the enzyme activity was 33% and the cytokine was 67% relative to the control. In these implants the statin was also able to decrease nitric oxide (NO) production, detected with an NO-sensitive electrode. To our knowledge this is the first study demonstrating an inhibitory role of fluvastatin on the production of NO in inflammatory angiogenesis of newly formed fibrovascular tissue.

In vitro and in vivo susceptibility of two-drug and three-drug combinations of terbinafine, itraconazole, caspofungin, ibuprofen and fluvastatin against Pythium insidiosum.

The present study investigated the in vitro inhibitory activity of terbinafine, itraconazole, caspofungin, fluvastatin and ibuprofen against 15 isolates of Pythium insidiosum in double and triple combinations and determined in vivo correlations using rabbits with experimental pythiosis. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M 38-A2 protocol (2008), and the in vitro interactions were evaluated using a checkerboard microdilution method. For the in vivo study, 20 rabbits inoculated with P. insidiosum zoospores were divided into four groups: group 1 was treated with terbinafine and itraconazole; group 2 was treated with terbinafine, itraconazole and fluvastatin; group 3 was treated with terbinafine and caspofungin; and group 4 was the control group. Combinations of terbinafine with caspofungin or ibuprofen were synergistic for 47% of the isolates, and antagonism was not observed in any of the double combinations. The triple combinations were mostly indifferent, but synergism and antagonism were also observed. In the in vivo study, the histological aspect of the lesions was similar among the groups, but group 2 showed the lowest amount of hyphae and differed significantly from the other groups.

Implant-induced intraperitoneal inflammatory angiogenesis is attenuated by fluvastatin.

1. Statins, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoA) inhibitors, exert anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant and anti-angiogenic effects. These effects are associated with downregulation of pro-inflammatory/pro-angiogenic molecules and upregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (e-NOS) expression/nitric oxide (NO) production. 2. Using the murine sponge model to induce chronic intraperitoneal inflammatory response, we evaluated the inflammatory components, angiogenic and NO production of the fibrovascular tissue, and their modulation by fluvastatin. 3. Our results showed that fluvastatin (0.6 and 6 mg/kg per day) inhibited haemoglobin (Hb) content 4.9±0.4 (n=15; control) vs 2.2±0.2 (n=6; fluvastatin 0.6) and 1.8±0.2 (n=6; fluvastatin 6.0) and the number of vessels in the treated group when compared with the control group. The inflammatory component, as assessed by myeloperoxidase and N-acetyl-ß-d-glucosaminidase activities and by the pro-inflammatory cytokines, tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1)/CCL2/JE levels, was also decreased by the compound. In the treated group, inhibition of both enzyme activities was 54% and 57%, respectively. The levels of the cytokines (TNF-α and CCL2/JE) intra-implant were decreased relative to the control. In these implants, fluvastatin was also able to increase NO production, as detected with an NO-sensitive electrode. 4. The inhibitory function of fluvastatin on key components of intraperitoneal inflammatory angiogenesis shown in the present study is clearly associated with the modulatory effects of this statin on vascular endothelial growth factor, TNF-α and NO production.

Effects of fluvastatin on insulin resistance and cardiac morphology in hypertensive patients.

Among hypertensive patients, cardiovascular disease morbidity is common, even in those who are adequately treated. New pharmacological strategies to mitigate the burden of arterial hypertension are needed. This 12-month, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study investigated the effect of statin (fluvastatin) treatment on ambulatory blood pressure (ABP), exercise blood pressure (EBP), myocardial structure, endothelial function and insulin resistance in 50 hypertensive patients. At baseline, the groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics, ABP, EBP, endothelial function and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). At the end of the study, there was no difference between groups in terms of resting systolic blood pressure. However, maximum systolic EBP was lower in the treatment group than in the placebo group (175 ± 18 vs 192 ± 23 mm Hg, P<0.05), as was left ventricular mass index (LVMI; 82 ± 15 vs 100 ± 23, P<0.05), and HOMA-IR index was lower after fluvastatin treatment (2.77 ± 1.46 vs 3.33 ± 1.73, P<0.05). Changes in lipid profile were not correlated with blood pressure, endothelial function, LVMI or HOMA-IR data. In hypertensive patients, fluvastatin can improve maximum systolic EBP, myocardial remodelling and insulin resistance, independently of lipid profile variations and endothelial function.

In vitro activity of terbinafine associated to amphotericin B, fluvastatin, rifampicin, metronidazole and ibuprofen against Pythium insidiosum.

We evaluated the in vitro activities of terbinafine alone and in combination with amphotericin B, fluvastatin, rifampicin, metronidazole or ibuprofen against 17 clinical isolates of Pythium insidiosum. The assays were based on technique M38-A2, as well as the checkerboard microdilution method. The main synergism observed was by combination of terbinafine plus amphotericin B (41.18%). Antagonisms were observed in combinations of terbinafine with fluvastatin (35.30%) or rifampicin (5.88%).

Enantioselectivity in the pharmacokinetic interaction between fluvastatin and lercanidipine in healthy volunteers.

Hypertension and dyslipidemia are independent risk factors for cardiovascular mortality and are frequently present in the same patient. Fluvastatin (FV), used to reduce cholesterol levels, and lercanidipine (LER), used to control blood pressure, are marketed as racemic mixtures. Therapeutic activities are 30-fold higher for (+)-3R, 5S-FV and 100- to 200-fold higher for S-LER compared with their respective antipodes. The present study describes the enantioselective pharmacokinetic interaction between LER and FV in healthy volunteers. A crossover randomized study was conducted in 3 phases on 8 volunteers treated with a single oral racemic dose of LER (20 mg) or FV (40 mg) or LER plus FV. Serial blood samples were collected from 0 to 24 hours. Plasma concentrations of the LER and FV enantiomers were determined by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry, and pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated using the WinNonlin software. The Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests (P < .05) were used to analyze enantiomer ratios and the pharmacokinetic drug interaction. Data are expressed as medians. In monotherapy, the kinetic disposition of both FV and LER was enantioselective. AUC values were significantly higher for (-)-3S,5R-FV than for (+)-3R,5S-FV (358.20 vs 279.68 ng.h/mL) and for S-LER compared with R-LER (13.90 vs 11.88 ng.h/mL). The pharmacokinetic parameters of FV were not enantioselective when combined with LER (AUC: (-)-3S,5R-FV: 325.21; (+)-3R,5S-FV: 316.44 ng.h/mL). There was a significant reduction in S-LER (8.06 vs 13.90 ng.h/mL) and R-LER (6.76 vs 11.88 ng.h/mL) AUC values when FV was coadministered. In conclusion, the interaction between FV-LER might be clinically relevant because AUC values of (+)-3R,5S-FV were increased when LER was coadministered, and AUC values of the 2 LER enantiomers were reduced when FV was coadministered.

Phase II study of metronomic chemotherapy with thalidomide, carboplatin-vincristine-fluvastatin in the treatment of brain stem tumors in children.

BACKGROUND: Brain stem tumors (BST) constitute 20% of all intracranial tumors. Survival for these patients has been very poor worldwide. Four different treatment schemes have been evaluated at our institution, with only a discrete increment in survival when treated with carboplatin-vincristine and fluvastatin (CVF). Low-dose, continuous antiangiogenic treatment has been recently introduced in the treatment of cancer. Our objective was to determine tumor response to metronomic chemotherapy combined with an antiangiogenic drug and fluvastatin and to calculate the survival of pediatric patients with brain stem tumors. METHODS: This was a phase II study. A magnetic resonance (MRI) study was made at inclusion and after the fourth course. Routine laboratory analyses were performed prior to each treatment scheme. Patients received four courses of chemotherapy every 28 days consisting of thalidomide alternating with fluvastatin every 14 days and combined with carboplatin and vincristine every 14 days followed by radiotherapy (56 cGy) and four more courses of the same chemotherapy. Toxicity was evaluated according to Miller criteria. RESULTS: Nine recently diagnosed BST patients were included. Five patients had low-grade astrocytomas, three patients had glioblastoma multiforme, and one patient presented high-grade astrocytoma. There was a significant reduction in tumor volume and a significant increase in survival at 24 months. Two patients died. Toxicity included carboplatin allergy in one patient, grades 1 and 3 neutropenia in two patients, and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: Metronomic treatment with carboplatin and vincristine associated with fluvastatin and thalidomide significantly increased survival of pediatric brain stem tumor patients. Tumor volume showed a significant reduction. Quality of life was also increased. Sample size must be increased in order to make final conclusions.

[Pleiotropic effects of statins]. / Efectos pleiotrópicos de las estatinas.

Results of numerous epidemiologic studies indicate that elevated serum cholesterol, especially the LDL fraction, is a major cause of coronary heart disease (CHD). Epidemiologic and angiographic evidence from primary and secondary prevention studies involving several HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) indicate that decreasing elevated serum cholesterol concentration (specifically LDL-cholesterol) can reduce the incidence of CHD and/or progression of atherosclerosis and results in a decrease in associated morbidity and mortality. It has been estimated that each 1% reduction in LDL-cholesterol concentration may result in a 1% decrease in the incidence of CHD. Furthermore, an analysis of pooled data from primary and secondary prevention studies found that treatment with a statin for a median duration of 5.4 years was associated with a 31% and 21% reduction in the risk of major coronary events and total mortality, respectively. This paper deals with the pharmacology of statins, specially with the pleiotropic effects of these drugs.

Statin-induced inhibition of MCF-7 breast cancer cell proliferation is related to cell cycle arrest and apoptotic and necrotic cell death mediated by an enhanced oxidative stress.

Statins have antiproliferative and anti-tumoral effects in MCF-7 cells. We determined the effect of statins upon MCF-7 cell cycle, toxicity, cell death, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and mitochondrial membrane potential. Fluvastatin, simvastatin and atorvastatin inhibited cell proliferation. Antiproliferation was associated with a decrease in the DNA synthesis and a cell cycle arrest in the G1 and G2/M phases. A loss in the mitochondrial membrane potential was observed with fluvastatin. Statins induced increase in ROS production that was associated with cell death, which was abrogated by the antioxidant NAC. Our results suggest that the cytotoxic effect observed is mediated by an oxidative stress.

Chiral evaluation of fluvastatin in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography electrospray mass spectrometry.

The report describes for the first time the enantioselective analysis of fluvastatin in plasma using LC-MS-MS. The enantiomers of fluvastatin (FV) were extracted from plasma with diisopropyl ether at pH 5.0. The enantiomers were separated on a ChiralCel OD-R column with a mobile phase consisting of a mixture of acetonitrile, methanol and water (24:36:40) containing 0.1% formic acid. The protonated ions and their respective product ions were monitored in two functions, 410.6>348.2 for FV enantiomers and 307.1>161.6 for the internal standard (warfarin). Recoveries were higher than 90% and the quantitation limit was 1.5 ng mL(-1) plasma for both enantiomers. The coefficients of variation and the relative errors obtained for the validation of the intra- and interassay precision and accuracy were less than 10%. The method was applied to the investigation of the enantioselective pharmacokinetics of FV administered in a single dose of 40 mg (Lescol, Novartis, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) to a patient with primary hypertension and hypercholesterolemia and genotyped as CYP2C9*1/*1. The data showed higher plasma concentrations of the (-)-3S,5R-fluvastatin enantiomer, with an AUC (-)/(+) of 1.84. Oral clearance values (CL/F) were 29.27 and 49.58 L/h, respectively, for the (-)-3S,5R- and (+)-3R,5S-fluvastatin enantiomers.

[Effects of atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin on endothelial function, lipid peroxidation, and aortic atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic rabbits]. / Efeitos da atorvastatina, fluvastatina, pravastatina e simvastatina sobre a função endotelial, a peroxidação lipídica e a aterosclerose aórtica em coelhos hipercolesterolêmicos.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin on endothelial function, aortic atherosclerosis, and the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) in native and oxidized LDL and in the arterial wall of hypercholesterolemic rabbits after adjusting the dosages of those statins to reduce total serum cholesterol levels to similar values. METHODS: Male rabbits were divided into the following 6 groups of 10 animals (n=10): 1) GH (control)--hypercholesterolemic animals; 2) GA--atorvastatin; 3) GF--fluvastatin; 4) GP--pravastatin; 5) GS--simvastatin; and 6) GN--normal. The animals were fed a standard food preparation enriched with 0.5% cholesterol and 2% coconut oil for 45 days. Fifteen days after beginning the experiment, atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin were administered for 15 days through gavage, and the dosages were adjusted to obtain similar cholesterol values in each group. At the end of the experiment, a blood sample was withdrawn for determining total cholesterol and separating the lipoproteins, and a segment of the thoracic aorta was removed to be used for studying endothelial function and lipid peroxidation, and for measuring aortic atherosclerosis in histological sections. RESULTS: The statins significantly reduced total serum cholesterol levels, LDL-cholesterol levels, and aortic atherosclerosis. The MDA content was also significantly reduced in native and oxidized LDL, as well as in the arterial wall. Endothelium-dependent relaxation was significantly greater in the treated group compared with that in the hypercholesterolemic group. CONCLUSION: The statins, at dosages adjusted, had a significant and similar effect in reducing lipid peroxidation in native and oxidized LDL-C and in arterial walls, in decreasing aortic atherosclerosis, and in reverting endothelial dysfunction.

Effect of fluvastatin on long-term outcome after coronary revascularization with stent implantation.

We assessed the impact of long-term fluvastatin treatment on adverse atherosclerotic cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization excluding repeat interventions due to restenosis in the first 6 months) in 847 patients (fluvastatin [n = 417] or placebo [n = 430]) with average cholesterol levels treated with stents in the Lescol Intervention Prevention Study (LIPS). During the 4-year follow-up period, fluvastatin significantly decreased total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and decreased the risk of first adverse atherosclerotic cardiac events by 30% compared with placebo (95% confidence interval -49 to -3.4, p = 0.03).

Comparison of the effect of two HMG CoA reductase inhibitors on LDL susceptibility to oxidation.

OBJECTIVE: To study the differences between fluvastatin and pravastatin regarding LDL susceptibility to oxidation, plasma levels of total cholesterol (TC), HDL-C, LDL-C and triglycerides (TG) in hypercholesterolemic patients with established coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS: A double-blind randomized parallel study was conducted that included 41 hypercholesterolemic outpatients with CHD treated at the Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul. The inclusion criteria were LDL-C above 100 mg/dL and triglycerides below 400 mg/dL based on 2 measures. After 4 weeks on a low cholesterol diet, those patients that fullfilled the inclusion criteria were randomized into 2 groups: the fluvastatin group (fluvastatin 40 mg/day) and the pravastatin group (pravastatin 20 mg/day), for 24 weeks of treatment. LDL susceptibility to oxidation was analyzed with copper-induced production of conjugated dienes (Cu2+) and water-soluble free radical initiator azo-bis (2'-2'amidinopropanil) HCl (AAPH). Spectroscopy nuclear magnetic resonance was used for determination of lipids. RESULTS: After 24 weeks of drug therapy, fluvastatin and pravastatin significantly reduced LDL susceptibility to oxidation as demonstrated by the reduced rate of oxidation (azo and Cu) and by prolonged azo-induced lag time (azo lag). The TC, LDL-C, and TG reduced significantly and HDL-C increased significantly. No differences between the drugs were observed. CONCLUSION: In hypercholesterolemic patients with CHD, both fluvastatin and pravastatin reduced LDL susceptibility to oxidation.

Effects of D-003, a mixture of long-chain aliphatic primary acids, fluvastatin and the combined therapy of D-003 plus fluvastatin on the lipid profile of normocholesterolemic rabbits.

D-003 is a mixture of long-chain aliphatic primary acids isolated from sugar cane wax with cholesterol-lowering effects proven in animals and healthy human volunteers. D-003 reduced serum total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in rabbits, while it increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and did not affect triglycerides. D-003 inhibits cholesterol synthesis by regulating, instead of directly inhibiting, hydroxamethylglutaryl-CoA (HMGCoA) reductase activity. Although the ways in which D-003 and statins inhibit cholesterol biosynthesis are not identical, the strong competitive inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis induced by statins suggests that an enhanced decrease of LDL-C and TC caused by the combined therapy D-003 plus statins is not expected. Nevertheless, taking into account the differential effects of D-003 and statins in HDL-C and triglycerides in rabbits, potential benefits of such combined therapy on other lipid variables cannot been discarded. Fluvastatin is a statin that inhibits competitively HMGCoA reductase, like other members of this class. This study was undertaken to compare the cholesterol-lowering effects of D-003, fluvastatin and the combined therapy of D-003 plus fluvastatin in normocholesterolemic rabbits. Animals were randomly distributed into four groups of eight. One control group received the vehicle, two groups were treated with D-003 or fluvastatin at 5 mg/kg/day each, and the fourth group received the combined therapy of both drugs at 5 mg/kg/day each. Treatments were orally administered for 30 days. Body weight, food consumption and overall animal behavior were recorded to detect any warning sign resulting from combined therapy. After treatment, it was found that both D-003 and fluvastatin had significantly lowered LDL-C - D-003 by 81.5% (p < 0.01) and fluvastatin by 61.4% (p < 0.05). Combined therapy reduced LDL-C values (75.9%). Final values and percent changes reached in all groups were different from the control (p < 0.01). The reductions of TC were consistent with LDL-C decreases, so that D-003, fluvastatin and combined therapy significantly lowered TC by 48.4% (p < 0.01), 39.7% (p < 0.05) and 45.3%, respectively, values being different from those of the control (p < 0.01). The responses of LDL-C and TC to combined therapy were statistically similar, but less pronounced than those reached by D-003 alone. D-003 and combined therapy, but not fluvastatin alone, increased HDL-C (+21.5% and + 19.0%, respectively), these changes being significant versus the control (p < 0.05). In turn, fluvastatin and combined therapy, but not D-003 alone, lowered triglycerides (13.6% and 13.0%, respectively, p < 0.05 versus control). The effects of combined therapy on HDL-C were similar to those of D-003 alone, and the effects of combined therapy on triglycerides were similar to those of fluvastatin alone. The only advantage of combined therapy appears to be that it shows better effects on HDL-C than those of fluvastatin alone and better effects on triglycerides than D-003 alone. No significant changes in lipid profile were observed in the control group. All groups showed similar food consumption and body weight gain, health status being unaffected by the treatments. It is concluded that D-003 and fluvastatin at 5 mg/kg/day administered orally for 30 days to normocholesterolemic rabbits lowered LDL-C and TC, D-003 being more effective in increasing HDL-C and fluvastatin in lowering triglycerides. Combined therapy did not improve the response of LDL-C and TC with respect to monotherapies, but induced better responses of HDL-C and triglycerides than fluvastatin alone had on HDL-C or D-003 alone had on triglycerides.

Stereospecific disposition of fluvastatin in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.

The study reports on the stereoselective pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin, a racemic mixture of (-)-(3S,5R)- and (+)-(3R,5S)-enantiomers, in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Wistar (control) and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats (n = 6/time point) received by oral gavage racemic fluvastatin (5 mg/kg), and blood samples were collected until 24 h. The enantiomers were analysed by chiral HPLC with fluorescence detection. The pharmacokinetic parameters were analysed by Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests. The results are reported as means (95% CI). The following differences (p < 0.05) were observed between the control and diabetic groups, respectively: maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of (-)-(3S,5R), 410.0 (310.0-510.0) versus 532.6 (463.5-601.8) ng x mL(-7); area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) for (-)-(3S,5R), 4342A (3,775.7-4,909.0) versus 3025.2 (2,218.9-3,831.5) ng x h x mL(-1); apparent total clearance (Cl/f) of (-)-(3S,5R), 0.6 (0.5-0.7) versus 0.9 (0.6-1.1) L x h(-1) x kg(-1); AUC(0-infinity) for (+)-(3R,5S), 493.5 (376.9-610.1) versus 758.5 (537.1-980.0) ng x h x mL(-1); and Cl/f of (+)-(3R,5S), 5.3 (3.9-6.8) versus 3.5 (2.6-4.4) L x h(-1) x kg(-1). Streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats alters the pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin in a stereoselective manner.