Impact of surgical timing and type of operative procedure on outcomes in periprosthetic hip fractures: an observational study at an NHS trust centre in the UK.

PURPOSE: There is a global trend of increased periprosthetic fractures due to the growing number of arthroplasty procedures. The present study assessed the impact of factors such as time to surgery and type of surgery on the outcomes, which have been seldom evaluated for periprosthetic fractures. METHODS: An observational study was conducted on consecutive 87 patients within an NHS district hospital trust in the UK. Patients who underwent a complete hip replacement prior to the fracture, received fixation therapy, or underwent revision surgery within the specified time were screened. Patients were grouped in two ways: based on time to surgery and based on surgery type. Logistic regression models were performed to assess for statistically significant differences in post-operative complication, 30-day, and 1-year mortality rates between groups, whilst adjusting for age, gender, and ASA grade. RESULTS: Forty-one patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), 29 patients underwent revision arthroplasty, and 17 patients were subjected to both, ORIF and revision arthroplasty. Sixty of the 87 patients were operated on > 48 h of injury. The median hospital stay was significantly lower in the ORIF plus revision arthroplasty group, versus other surgical groups (p < 0.05) whilst it was significantly higher in the group of patients who underwent surgery after 48 h of injury (p < 0.05). Numerically higher mortality was noted in the revision arthroplasty group (31.03%, p > 0.05). The group that was operated after 48 h of injury showed greater mortality but was comparable to the other group (25% vs. 14.81%, p > 0.05). For post-operative complications, none of the variables were significantly predictive (p > 0.05). However, for 30-day mortality, ASA grade (p = 0.04) and intra-operative complications (p = 0.0001) were significantly predictive. Additionally, for 1-year mortality, ASA grade (p = 0.004) was noted to be significantly predictive. CONCLUSION: Revision and delayed periprosthetic fracture management (> 48 h after injury) group showed a numerically greater mortality risk; however, this finding was not statistically significant. ASA grading at baseline is predictive of mortality for periprosthetic fractures.

Selected Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented polished femoral components can be safely treated with osteosynthesis.

AIMS: We aimed to compare the implant survival, complications, readmissions, and mortality of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) treated with internal fixation with that of B1 PFFs treated with internal fixation and B2 fractures treated with revision arthroplasty. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 112 PFFs, of which 47 (42%) B1 and 27 (24%) B2 PFFs were treated with internal fixation, whereas 38 (34%) B2 fractures underwent revision arthroplasty. Decision to perform internal fixation for B2 PFFs was based on specific radiological (polished femoral components, intact bone-cement interface) and clinical criteria (low-demand patient). Median follow-up was 36.4 months (24 to 60). Implant survival and mortality over time were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events (measured with a modified Dindo-Clavien classification) and 90-day readmissions were additionally compared between groups. RESULTS: In all, nine (8.01%) surgical failures were detected. All failures occurred within the first 24 months following surgery. The 24-month implant survival was 95.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 89.13 to 100) for B1 fractures treated with internal fixation, 90% (95% CI 76.86 to 100) for B2 PFFs treated with osteosynthesis-only, and 85.8% (95% CI 74.24 to 97.36) for B2 fractures treated with revision THA, without significant differences between groups (p = 0.296). Readmissions and major adverse events including mortality were overall high, but similar between groups (p > 0.05). The two-year patient survival rate was 87.1% (95% CI 77.49 to 95.76), 66.7% (95% CI 48.86 to 84.53), and 84.2% (95% CI 72.63 to 95.76), for the B1 group, B2 osteosynthesis group, and B2 revision group, respectively (p = 0.102). CONCLUSION: Implant survival in Vancouver B2 PFFs treated with internal fixation was similar to that of B1 fractures treated with the same method and to B2 PFFs treated with revision arthroplasty. Low-demand, elderly patients with B2 fractures around well-cemented polished femoral components with an intact bone-cement interface can be safely treated with internal fixation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7):1222-1230.

Management of low periprosthetic distal femoral fractures.

AIMS: Debate continues regarding the optimum management of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures (PDFFs). This study aims to determine which operative treatment is associated with the lowest perioperative morbidity and mortality when treating low (Su type II and III) PDFFs comparing lateral locking plate fixation (LLP-ORIF) or distal femoral arthroplasty (DFA). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 60 consecutive unilateral (PDFFs) of Su types II (40/60) and III (20/60) in patients aged ≥ 60 years: 33 underwent LLP-ORIF (mean age 81.3 years (SD 10.5), BMI 26.7 (SD 5.5); 29/33 female); and 27 underwent DFA (mean age 78.8 years (SD 8.3); BMI 26.7 (SD 6.6); 19/27 female). The primary outcome measure was reoperation. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications, calculated blood loss, transfusion requirements, functional mobility status, length of acute hospital stay, discharge destination and mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Cox multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for reoperation after LLP-ORIF. RESULTS: Follow-up was at mean 3.8 years (1.0 to 10.4). One-year mortality was 13% (8/60). Reoperation was more common following LLP-ORIF: 7/33 versus 0/27 (p = 0.008). Five-year survival for reoperation was significantly better following DFA; 100% compared to 70.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 51.8% to 89.8%, p = 0.006). There was no difference for the endpoint mechanical failure (including radiological loosening); ORIF 74.5% (56.3 to 92.7), and DFA 78.2% (52.3 to 100, p = 0.182). Reoperation following LLP-ORIF was independently associated with medial comminution; hazard ratio (HR) 10.7 (1.45 to 79.5, p = 0.020). Anatomical reduction was protective against reoperation; HR 0.11 (0.013 to 0.96, p = 0.046). When inadequately fixed fractures were excluded, there was no difference in five-year survival for either reoperation (p = 0.156) or mechanical failure (p = 0.453). CONCLUSION: Absolute reoperation rates are higher following LLP fixation of low PDFFs compared to DFA. Where LLP-ORIF was well performed with augmentation of medial comminution, there was no difference in survival compared to DFA. Though necessary in very low fractures, DFA should be used with caution in patients with greater life expectancies due to the risk of longer term aseptic loosening. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):635-643.

Survival and reasons for revision of the uncemented Symax hip stem: A Dutch Arthroplasty Register study.

AIMS: Previous studies have already shown early proximal ingrowth, fast osseous integration, and a stable fit of the uncemented Symax hip stem, with excellent clinical and radiographic performance. Aims were to evaluate cumulative revision rates and reasons for revision of the Symax hip stem using Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) data and to assess possible associations between patient characteristics and revision rate of the Symax hip stem. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All total hip arthroplasties with the uncemented Symax hip stem registered in the LROI between 2007 and 2017 were included (n = 5,013). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to assess the cumulative 1, 5 and 7-year revision percentages. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to assess the association between patient and procedural characteristics, and revision arthroplasty of the stem. RESULTS: Cumulative 1, 5, and 7-year revision rates (with 95% confidence interval (CI)) for revision of any component were 1.5% (CI 1.2%-1.8%), 3.2% (CI 2.7%-3.7%), and 3.8% (CI 3.1%-4.4%) respectively. Cumulative 1, 5, and 7-year stem revision rates of the Symax hip stem were 0.9% (CI 0.6%-1.1%), 1.5% (CI 1.1%-1.9%), and 1.7% (CI 1.3%-2.1%) respectively. Periprosthetic fractures (n = 35) and loosening of the stem (n = 30) were the most common reasons for revision of the stem. Revision of the stem was associated with acute fracture as primary diagnosis (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.4 (CI 1.3-4.3)), or history of a previous surgery to the affected hip (HR 2.7 (CI 1.4-5.2)). CONCLUSION: This population-based registry study shows revision rates for the Symax hip stem comparable to those for best performing uncemented total hip arthroplasties in the Netherlands. Primary diagnosis of an acute fracture, and history of previous surgery on the affected hip, were significantly associated risk factors for revision of the Symax hip stem, and we discourage the use of the Symax hip stem in these patients.

High mortality following revision hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic femoral fracture.

AIMS: To determine mortality risk after first revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF), and to compare this to mortality risk after primary and first revision THA for other common indications. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of THAs recorded in the National Joint Registry between 2003 and 2015, linked to national mortality data. First revision THAs for PFF, infection, dislocation, and aseptic loosening were identified. We used a flexible parametric model to estimate the cumulative incidence function of death at 90 days, one year, and five years following first revision THA and primary THA, in the presence of further revision as a competing risk. Analysis covariates were age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade. RESULTS: A total of 675,078 primary and 74,223 first revision THAs were included (of which 6,131 were performed for PFF). Following revision for PFF, mortality ranged from 9% at 90 days, 21% at one year, and 60% at five years in the highest risk group (males, ≥ 75 years, ASA ≥ 3) to 0.6%, 1.4%, and 5.5%, respectively, for the lowest risk group (females, < 75 years, ASA ≤ 2). Mortality was greater in all groups following first revision THA for PFF than for primary THA. Compared to mortality risk after first revision THA for infection, dislocation, or aseptic loosening, revision for PFF was associated with higher five-year mortality in all groups except males < 75 years with an ASA ≤ 2. CONCLUSION: Mortality risk after revision THA for PFF is high, reaching 60% at five years in the highest risk patient group. In comparison to other common indications for revision, PFF demonstrated the highest overall risk of mortality at five years. These estimates can be used in the surgical decision-making process and when counselling patients and carers regarding surgical risk. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1670-1674.

Modifiable risk factors for mortality in revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic fracture.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to identify modifiable risk factors associated with mortality in patients requiring revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for periprosthetic hip fracture. METHODS: The electronic records of consecutive patients undergoing revision THA for periprosthetic hip fracture between December 2011 and October 2018 were reviewed. The data which were collected included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, the preoperative serum level of haemoglobin, time to surgery, operating time, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, and postoperative surgical and medical complications. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine independent modifiable factors associated with mortality at 90 days and one year postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 203 patients were identified. Their mean age was 78 years (44 to 100), and 108 (53%) were female. The median time to surgery was three days (interquartile range (IQR) 2 to 5). The mortality rate at one year was 13.8% (n = 28). The commonest surgical complication was dislocation (n = 22, 10.8%) and the commonest medical complication within 90 days of surgery was hospital-acquired pneumonia (n = 25, 12%). Multivariate analysis showed that the rate of mortality one year postoperatively was five-fold higher in patients who sustained a dislocation (odds ratio (OR) 5.03 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.60 to 15.83); p = 0.006). The rate of mortality was also four-fold higher in patients who developed hospital-acquired pneumonia within 90 days postoperatively (OR 4.43 (95% CI 1.55 to 12.67); p = 0.005). There was no evidence that the time to surgery was a risk factor for death at one year. CONCLUSION: Dislocation and hospital-acquired pneumonia following revision THA for a periprosthetic fracture are potentially modifiable risk factors for mortality. This study suggests that surgeons should consider increasing constraint to reduce the risk of dislocation, and the early involvement of a multidisciplinary team to reduce the risk of hospital-acquired pneumonia. We found no evidence that the time to surgery affected mortality, which may allow time for medical optimization, surgical planning, and resource allocation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(5):580-585.

Análisis de la mortalidad tras el tratamiento quirúrgico de las fracturas periprotésicas de fémur distal / Analysis of mortality after surgical treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures

INTRODUCCIÓN: Está aumentando la incidencia de las fracturas periprotésicas de rodilla debido al incremento en el número de artroplastias totales de rodilla realizadas, junto al envejecimiento poblacional. Encontramos escasos estudios que analicen en nuestro medio la mortalidad a largo plazo tras la intervención quirúrgica. Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar la mortalidad y la supervivencia tras el tratamiento quirúrgico de las fracturas periprotésicas de fémur distal en nuestro medio. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Realizamos un estudio observacional retrospectivo de una serie consecutiva de 97 pacientes intervenidos quirúrgicamente en nuestro centro por fractura periprotésica de rodilla entre los años 2007 y 2015, con un seguimiento mínimo de 12 meses. Se analizaron estadísticamente diversas variables sociodemográficas, clínicas y quirúrgicas. Se realizó una consulta al índice nacional de defunciones del Ministerio de Sanidad para el análisis de mortalidad y se analizó la supervivencia utilizando el método Kaplan-Meier. RESULTADOS: Revisamos un total de 97 pacientes con edad media de 75años, de los cuales 86 fueron mujeres y 11 fueron hombres. El 50,5% de los pacientes presentaban alguna comorbilidad. La demora media hasta la intervención fue de 3,1 días. Respecto al tratamiento, 45 pacientes fueron intervenidos mediante osteosíntesis con placa (49,5%), 40 de ellos con clavo intramedular (41,2%) y en 9 se realizó una revisión de la artroplastia (9,3%). Se registraron un total de 30 defunciones durante el seguimiento, con una mortalidad acumulada al año, a los 3años y a los 10 años del 7,2, del 17,5 y del 30,9%, respectivamente, aumentando progresivamente en mayores de 75 años. No hubo diferencias significativas en las tasas de mortalidad respecto al método de osteosíntesis. La principal complicación fue la seudoartrosis (6,2%). CONCLUSIONES: Las fracturas periprotésicas de rodilla se asocian a altas tasas de complicaciones y de mortalidad, siendo la edad del paciente y la propia lesión factores no modificables que pueden influir en la mortalidad tras la cirugía, mientras que otras variables, como el tipo de intervención o la demora quirúrgica, no mostraron diferencias en las tasas de mortalidad en nuestro estudio

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of periprosthetic fractures of the knee is increasing due to the increase in the number of total knee arthroplasties performed, together with population aging. We found few studies that analyze mortality in our setting after surgery. Our objective was to evaluate mortality and survival after surgical treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur in our environment. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We conducted a retrospective observational study of a consecutive series of 97 patients surgically treated in our centre for periprosthetic knee fracture between 2007-2015, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Diverse sociodemographic, clinical and surgical variables were analyzed. A consultation was made to the National Death Index of the Ministry of Health for the analysis of mortality and survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: We reviewed a total of 97 patients with an average age of 75 years, of which 86 were women and 11 were men. Of the patients, 50.5% of patients had some comorbidity. The average delay until the intervention was 3.1 days. With respect to the treatment, 45 patients were operated by osteosynthesis with plate (49.5%), 40 with intramedullary nail (41.2%) and 9 with revision of the arthroplasty (9.3%). A total of 30 deaths were recorded during the follow-up, with cumulative mortality in the first year, at 3 and at 10 years of 7.2%, 17.5% and 30.9%, respectively, progressively increasing in people over 75 years. There was no significant difference in mortality rates with the osteosynthesis method. The main complication was pseudoarthrosis (6.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Periprosthetic knee fractures are associated with high rates of complications and mortality. The patient's age and the lesion itself are non-modifiable factors that can influence mortality after surgery, while other variables such as the type of intervention or surgical delay did not show differences in mortality rates in our study

Analysis of mortality after surgical treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures. / Análisis de la mortalidad tras el tratamiento quirúrgico de las fracturas periprotésicas de fémur distal.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of periprosthetic fractures of the knee is increasing due to the increase in the number of total knee arthroplasties performed, together with population aging. We found few studies that analyze mortality in our setting after surgery. Our objective was to evaluate mortality and survival after surgical treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur in our environment. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We conducted a retrospective observational study of a consecutive series of 97 patients surgically treated in our centre for periprosthetic knee fracture between 2007-2015, with a minimum follow-up of 12months. Diverse sociodemographic, clinical and surgical variables were analyzed. A consultation was made to the National Death Index of the Ministry of Health for the analysis of mortality and survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: We reviewed a total of 97 patients with an average age of 75years, of which 86 were women and 11 were men. Of the patients, 50.5% of patients had some comorbidity. The average delay until the intervention was 3.1days. With respect to the treatment, 45 patients were operated by osteosynthesis with plate (49.5%), 40 with intramedullary nail (41.2%) and 9 with revision of the arthroplasty (9.3%). A total of 30 deaths were recorded during the follow-up, with cumulative mortality in the first year, at 3 and at 10 years of 7.2%, 17.5% and 30.9%, respectively, progressively increasing in people over 75years. There was no significant difference in mortality rates with the osteosynthesis method. The main complication was pseudoarthrosis (6.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Periprosthetic knee fractures are associated with high rates of complications and mortality. The patient's age and the lesion itself are non-modifiable factors that can influence mortality after surgery, while other variables such as the type of intervention or surgical delay did not show differences in mortality rates in our study.

High mortality following distal femur fractures: a cohort study including three hundred and two distal femur fractures.

PURPOSE: What are the overall, 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year mortality rates following distal femur fractures? METHODS: Epidemiological cohort study. Retrospective reviews of charts and X-rays based on a search in the National Danish Health Registry. RESULTS: A total of 293 patients were treated for 302 distal femur fractures between 2005 and 2010. The mean age at the time of fracture was 44.0 years for males and 71.6 years for females. The overall mortality rates after a non-periprosthetic distal femur fracture at 30 days, six months, and one year were 5%, 15%, and 21%, respectively. The mortality rates for patients at > 60 years at 30 days, six months, and one year were 8%, 26%, and 35%, respectively. The mortality rates for patients at ≤ 60 years at 30 days, six months, and one year were 1%, 2%, and 3%, respectively. The overall mortality rates after a periprosthetic distal femur fracture at 30 days, six months, and one year were 10%, 15%, and 15%. Males were 2.6 (95% CI 1.01-6.86, P = 0.04) times more likely to die within the first year compared to women. Patients treated by conservative means shows a 2.8 (95% CI 1.41-5.54, P = 0.03) times increased likelihood of death within the first year compared to patients treated with surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The overall one year mortality rate was 21% for non-periprosthetic distal femur fractures and was elevated to 35% in patients older than 60 years. Patients presenting with a periprosthetic fracture showed a one year mortality rate of 15%.

A case-control study of 30-day mortality in periprosthetic hip fractures and hip fractures.

INTRODUCTION: There are increasing numbers of periprosthetic femoral fractures, which have high mortality rates. These fractures occur in a similar demographic to hip fractures. There has been limited research on mortality following these fractures. This study compared 30-day mortality in periprosthetic hip fractures with case-matched hip fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Case notes of periprosthetic hip fractures between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2015 were reviewed retrospectively at a single institution. There were 173 periprosthetic hip fractures over the seven years of the study. All hip fractures attending the same institution have data collected prospectively for the National Hip Fracture Database. Data were analysed from the Hip Fracture Database. A power calculation was undertaken; 173 periprosthetic hip fractures were matched to 865 hip fractures individually for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade and capacity. RESULTS: The median wait to surgery was 88 hours for periprosthetic fractures and 23 hours for hip fractures (p < 0.00001); 22.5% of patients with periprosthetic fractures underwent surgery within 36 hours compared with 68.2% of those with hip fractures (p < 0.0001). The median length of stay was 16 days for periprosthetic fractures and 10 days for hip fractures (p < 0.00001). The 30-day mortality was 6.4% for periprosthetic hip fractures and 3.1% for case-matched hip fractures (odds ratio 2.11, 95% confidence interval 1.03-4.36; p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Periprosthetic hip fractures have a significantly higher mortality than hip fractures. Further research should aim to improve outcomes in these patients.

Cable plate fixation for Vancouver Type-B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures-Our experience and identification of a subset at risk of non-union.

INTRODUCTION: Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures is challenging. Vancouver classification is universally accepted for fracture description and management algorithm. Guidelines for the treatment of type B1 fracture is open reduction and internal fixation. The difficulty involved in managing this group is evidenced by the array of treatment options described in the literature. METHODS: Thirty two patients with Vancouver type B1 fracture treated with osteosynthesis using cable plate (between 2007 and 2015) were reviewed retrospectively. There were 21 females and 11 males with an average age of 81yrs (56-96 years). The average follow-up was 21 months. All patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically until fracture united or patient re-operated. Postoperative protocol followed was six weeks toe touch weight bearing, 6 weeks partial weight bearing and then full weight bearing if there was no displacement. Post-operative radiographs were evaluated for fracture union. Statistical analysis was done using contingency tables with Fishers exact test and a p-value < 0.05 for significance. RESULTS: In twenty four patients fracture union was achieved. Non-union was recorded in four patients. Comparing the different fracture patterns all non-unions occurred in the fractures which were short oblique or transverse at the cemented stem tip (p = 0.001). Fractures were more common in female patients and associated more with the uncemented femoral stems, but it was not associated with increased rate of non-union (p = 0.68). All failed osteosynthesis were revised successfully using long stem prosthesis. Two patients died within 2 months, one patient died within 4 months, one patient was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Transverse or short oblique periprosthetic fractures around tip of cemented femoral stems can have high failure rates with just internal fixation. Revision arthroplasty may be the preferred option if possible otherwise may need to supplement fixation with cortical onlay graft. We should consider subcategorising Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fractures into groups based on the pattern and fracture level in relation to the femoral stem.

Lower reoperation rate with locking plates compared with conventional plates in Vancouver type C periprosthetic femoral fractures: A register study of 639 cases in Sweden.

AIM: To investigate demographics and outcomes of Vancouver type C periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFF) treated with open reduction and internal fixation. METHODS: Patient data were obtained from medical charts of cases reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register and/or from the National Patient Register. Vancouver type C fractures undergoing surgery between 2001 and 2011, in patients who had received their primary THR between 1979 and 2011, were included. Any further reoperation performed between 2001 and 2013 and related to the PPFF constituted the primary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 632 patients with 639 Vancouver type C fractures were identified. The majority of the patients were women (84%) and they had a fracture distal to a cemented stem (95%). The mean age at the time of fracture was 72 years. Treatment was performed with a locking plate (363 cases), a conventional plate (184 cases), an intramedullary nail (62 cases), or with double plating (30 cases). The overall reoperation rate was 17%, and mortality within one year of the operation was 16%. Locking plates had a significantly lower reoperation rate than conventional plates (p<0.001) and intramedullary nailing (p = 0.005). Interprosthetic femoral fractures did not have a statistically different outcome compared with non-IPFFs. CONCLUSIONS: The lowest reoperation rate was observed using locking plates in Vancouver type C fractures when compared with conventional plates or intramedullary nailing. The presence of an ipsilateral knee prosthesis did not influence the outcome of the surgical treatment.

Frailty Index Is Associated With Periprosthetic Fracture and Mortality After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

This cohort study of adult (≥50 years) patients aimed to calculate a validated, preoperative frailty deficit index (FI) and used it to compare outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), primary and revision, from 2005 through 2016. Using multivariable logistic and Cox regression, the authors analyzed whether FI, adjusted for age, predicts outcomes prior to hospital discharge, within 90 days, and within 365 days. They classified 9818 patients undergoing TKA (7920 primary and 1898 revision; median age, 69 years) as frail (21%), vulnerable (39%), and non-frail (40%). Frail, relative to non-frail, patients were more often female with more systemic diseases (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, ≥III). While in-hospital, frail patients were found to have increased odds of reoperation (odds ratio, 2.52) and wound complications/hematoma (odds ratio, 2.15). Within 90 days, there was increased risk for periprosthetic fracture (>4-fold) and mortality (>9-fold) following TKA after age adjustment. Within the first year, frail patients were at heightened risk for death (hazard ratio, 8.08), any patient infection (hazard ratio, 1.97), wound complications/hematoma (hazard ratio, 2.16), periprosthetic fracture (hazard ratio, 3.03), and reoperation (hazard ratio, 1.41). At no time point were significant associations found with arthrofibrosis, aseptic loosening, or patellar clunk syndrome. One-fifth of patients undergoing primary and revision TKAs are frail and at notable risk for complications. Calculating a preoperative FI should guide pre-habilitation efforts (eg, chronic disease management, wellness) before and postoperative surveillance after TKA. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(6):335-343.].

Early Morbidity but Not Mortality Increases With Surgery Delayed Greater Than 24 Hours in Patients With a Periprosthetic Fracture of the Hip.

BACKGROUND: Studies have identified a possible morbidity and mortality benefit with expedited time to surgery after a native hip fracture. This association after hip periprosthetic fractures (PPF) has been less clearly delineated. The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of time to surgery on rates of 30-day complications. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry was used to identify all patients who underwent surgical intervention for hip PPF between 2005 and 2016. Patients were stratified into 2 cohorts based on time from hospital admission to surgery, either ≤24 hours (expedited) or >24 hours (non-expedited). Thirty-day outcome variables were assessed using bivariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: We identified 857 patients undergoing surgical intervention for hip PPF, of whom 402 (46.9%) underwent expedited surgery and 455 (53.1%) underwent non-expedited surgery. Patients with non-expedited surgery had an average time to surgery of 2.4 days (range, 1-14 days). Multivariate analysis adjusting for differences in baseline patient characteristics revealed that patients with a non-expedited procedure had higher rates of overall complications (odds ratio [OR] = 1.72; P = .014), respiratory complications (OR = 4.15; P = .0029), urinary tract infections (OR = 2.77; P = .020), nonhome discharge (OR = 2.22; P < .001), and blood transfusions (OR = 1.86; P < .001). There was no statistical difference in mortality (P = .093). Patients with non-expedited surgery also had longer total and postoperative (+2.7 days; P < .001) length of stay. CONCLUSION: This study did not identify any statistical difference in mortality but found an association with increased postoperative complications and non-expedited surgery for PPF. Additional prospective studies may be warranted to identify the causative factors behind this association.

Outcome of surgical treatment of inter prosthetic fractures: A case series.

INTRODUCTION: Interprosthetic fractures occur between a total knee replacement and a femoral stem of either a hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement. The number of interprosthetic fractures will increase as the number of joint replacements rises. There is currently a paucity of literature looking at the outcomes of interprosthetic fractures. Therefore, we performed a retrospective study to: (1) determine fracture union in patients following surgical treatment of a femoral interprosthetic fracture, (2) measure outcomes included mortality and complications. HYPOTHESIS: Favoring bone fixation instead of prosthetic revision gives an acceptable rate of reoperation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case note review of all interprosthetic femoral fractures admitted to a tertiary trauma centre over a 7-year period. There were 24 patients (4 males and 20 females) with a mean age of 82.3 (65-98). The initial operative procedure was a total hip replacement (THR) and a total knee replacement (TKR) in 19 patients, one THR and revision TKR, four hip hemiarthroplasty and TKR. There were 23 cemented femoral stems, and 1 uncemented femoral stem. The median time to surgery was 84hours. The median length of hospital stay was 16 days. Nineteen patients underwent open reduction internal fixation and 1 of these used a strut graft. Two patients underwent revision knee replacements and 3 underwent a revision hip replacement. All patients had at least 2 years clinical follow-up. RESULTS: One patient died within 30 days of fracture, leaving 23 patients to assess bone union. Another patient died within 1 year of fracture. Three out of 24 patients (12.5%) suffered a complication that required further surgery. The fracture united in 19/23 (82.6%) of patients and the 2-year mortality rate was 5/24 (20.8%). DISCUSSION: Interprosthetic fractures are complex fractures occurring in elderly patients with multiple medical comorbidities. Whenever possible bone fixation instead of prostehtic revision give a low rate of complication and reoperation. The surgical treatments are complex, but with a well-performed surgical technique and an adequate rehabilitation program can result in satisfactory outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective case series.

Long-Term Survival of Retained Cementless Hip Stems at an Average of 13 Years After Isolated Cup Revision.

BACKGROUND: Cementless stems demonstrate excellent long-term survival, but little is known about the long-term survival rate of the stem after isolated cup revision. The aim of the present retrospective cohort study was to determine the long-term survival rate of cementless stems retained after prior cup revision. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical and radiographic results of 119 total hip arthroplasties (THAs) utilizing a cementless, grit-blasted, tapered titanium femoral stem that were performed in 113 patients between January 1985 and December 1989. The mean age at the time of the primary THA was 52 years (range, 16 to 74 years) and the mean time between primary THA and cup revision was 13 years (standard deviation [SD], 6 years; range, 0 to 30 years). At the time of the latest follow-up, no patient was lost to follow-up, 36 patients representing 37 hips had died, and 11 hips in 11 patients had required stem revision. The mean follow-up was 13 years following cup revision (SD, 6 years; range, 0 to 28 years). A competing risk analysis was performed to estimate the survival of the stem after isolated cup revision, with death being the competing risk factor. RESULTS: At 20 years after cup revision, the survival rate of retained stems was 89% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79% to 94%) for the end point of stem revision for any reason and 97% (95% CI, 91% to 99%) for the end point of stem revision for aseptic loosening. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term survival of cementless stems retained after cup revision was excellent. Well-fixed cementless stems should be retained during cup revision for aseptic loosening. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Outcomes and predictors of mortality following periprosthethic proximal femoral fractures.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic fractures are a well-documented, serious complication of joint arthroplasty, occurring in up to 11% of hip replacements. We examined periprosthetic femoral fractures over an 8 year period to determine the demographics, fracture pattern and management options and associated outcomes. Furthermore, we sought to determine which comorbidities resulted in increased risk of 12 month mortality after periprosthetic fractures about hip replacements Methods: A retrospective review of a prospective fracture database was conducted for the years 2007-2015. The Fracture Outcomes Research Database (FORD) was interrogated for patients aged >60 years, admitted with periprosthetic hip fracture. Radiographic and Electronic Clinical Record review was performed to classify fractures, record treatments, comorbidies and 12 month mortality. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine comorbidities that significantly increased the risk of 12 month mortality. RESULTS: A total of 189 patients were identified. The majority were Vancouver B1 fractures (61.9%); the operations were primarily cable plating (75.1%), with a smaller number of revision arthroplasties (21.2%) and only three proximal femoral replacement (1.6%). Four patients (2.1%) died before surgery. Only 27.3% returned to their usual residence post-discharge. Overall 30-day mortality was 2.1%, and one-year mortality was 11.6%. Patients who died tended to be older. In the multivariate analysis, ASA grade III/IV and active neoplasia were significant contributors to 12 month mortality. CONCLUSION(S): Our 12 month mortality (11.6%) is at the lower end of existing reported literature, and serves as a benchmark for UK practice. In the multivariate analysis, only ASA grade III/IV and an active neoplastic process were significantly associated with increased risk of mortality. Whilst large, multicenter trials, utilizing standardized treatment techniques are required to fully assess risk factors for 12-month mortality, it appears that those at significant risk are elderly, frail individuals with an active malignancy.

Geriatric distal femoral fractures: A retrospective study of 30 day mortality.

INTRODUCTION: Distal femoral fractures have many of the same challenges as hip fractures, but there has been limited research into outcomes following these. The aim of this study was to assess 30 day mortality following distal femoral fractures in comparison to hip fractures presenting to a single institution Secondary outcomes included risk factors for mortality, post-operative complications and union. METHODS: A retrospective case series of all distal femoral fragility fractures in patients over 65, and hip fractures over a 5 year period at a single institution. RESULTS: 88 distal femoral fractures and 2837 hip fractures fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In the distal femoral fractures there were 80 females and 8 males with a mean age of 82.4 (range 65-103). The mean age of the hip fractures was 83.7 (range 65-106) and there were 2066 females and 771 males. The overall 30 day mortality for hip fractures was 7.7% and was 9.1% for distal femoral fractures. The risk ratio was 1.1777(95% CI 0.6009-2.3080) (p = 0.6338). There was no significant difference in 30 day mortality between the two fracture types. Of the 88 distal femoral fractures 75 (85.2%) underwent open reduction internal fixation, 5 (5.7%) intramedullary nail and 8 (9.1%) conservative treatment. 11.4% suffered a medical complication. 9.1% patients required at least 1 further surgical procedure. The union rate was 94.3%. The 1 year mortality was 34.1%. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in 30 day mortality between distal femoral and hip fractures. Distal femoral fractures occur in a complex group of patients that is similar to hip fractures. They have high mortality and complication rates.

Mortality After Periprosthetic Femur Fractures During and After Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: We determined mortality rates after intraoperative and postoperative periprosthetic femur fractures in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: The study population comprised 522 intraoperative and 480 postoperative femur fractures in 26,250 primary THA patients and 590 intraoperative and 224 postoperative femur fractures in 4,532 revision THA patients. The risk of death was examined using Cox regression models. RESULTS: In primary THA, intraoperative periprosthetic femur fractures were not associated with excess risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.22). The risk of death was slightly elevated among primary THA patients with postoperative femur fractures (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.08 to 1.43), but the excess risk was only confined to patients with comorbid orthopaedic conditions. In revision THA, neither intraoperative nor postoperative periprosthetic femur fractures were associated with excess risk of death. CONCLUSION: Periprosthetic femur fractures are not associated with excess mortality among primary osteoarthritis patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Interprosthetic femoral fractures: Morbidity and mortality in a retrospective, multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: Interprosthetic femoral fractures (IFF) are becoming more frequent; however they have not been the subject of many publications and the largest study on this topic includes only 30 cases. The complication rate and clinical outcomes have only been evaluated in small case series. This led us to conduct a retrospective, multicenter, observational study in IFF patients with at least 12 months' follow-up to (1) determine the mortality and morbidity (2) determine the clinical and radiological outcomes and (3) identify elements of the treatment indications. HYPOTHESIS: The morbidity and mortality rates will be comparable to those in recent studies on this topic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 51 patients (49 women, 2 men) with a mean age of 82.8±9.2 years [55-97], a mean Parker score of 4.9±2.4 and a mean Katz score of 4.4±1.4 who had suffered an IFF between 2009 and 2015. According to the SoFCOT modifications of the Vancouver classification, 30 fractures were interprosthetic in the shaft segment where there were no implants (19 double C and 11 type D (corresponding to a type C with less than two diaphysis widths between the extension stems of the hip and knee implants)) while 21 were periprosthetic, with 12 around the THA (11 B1 and 1 B3) and 9 around the TKA (8 B1 and 1 B3). One patient was treated conservatively with an external fixator but died the next day, 2 patients received a new total hip arthroplasty and 47 underwent plate fixation of their fracture (one patient was treated non-operatively because of poor medical condition). RESULTS: One patient was lost to follow-up, and nine died during the first 6 months. Six early surgical site complications occurred and 13 general ones. Within 1 year of the IFF, there were six mechanical complications, two surgical site infections and two cases of loosening. The mean follow-up was 27.6±17.2 months. The mean time to union was 19.25±8.8 weeks. The mean final Parker score was 3.37±2.6 and the mean Katz score was 2.98±1.8; both were significantly lower than the initial scores. Six patients died between months 12 and 50. The overall mortality at the final review was 31% (16/51) with a median survival of 3.45 years. DISCUSSION: Our hypothesis was not confirmed because the mortality and morbidity in our study were higher than in other published studies. In the six relevant studies identified, the surgical site infection rate was 12.3%, the major revision rate was 11.6% and the mortality rate was 6.5%. In our study, these values were 24%, 24% and 31%, respectively. These worse results may be explained by the very fragile nature of the studied population and the surgeons not following appropriate technical rules for fracture fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Retrospective study.